Slashdot Mirror


George Lucas May Be Completely Evil

gabec writes "Sci-fi Wire is reporting a couple rumors about the changes being made to the original Star Wars trilogy for its next release. That being that Natalie Portman may be being inserted into Episode VI: Return of the Jedi and that universally reviled Jar Jar Binks may be being inserted into Episode IV: A New Hope. May The Force forbid." Mind you this is reported as rumor, but it's so unsurprisingly possible...

971 comments

  1. Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're like abused wives. You keep coming back for more, even though it hurts.

    1. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by digitalunity · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll take all the punishment George can give out for just a little more Natalie Portman

      :)

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    2. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, since when was more natalie such a bad thing?

      Slightly offtopic, but I'd like to share with the slashdot community that there was this guy beating his girl out in front of my apartment today, and I scared him off with my katana. I fucken love samurai swords, and the dumb nerds like me who actually have one : )

    3. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Gorbie · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Boston we can get the fans at the Fleetcenter to chant "Wife-beater" at Jason Kidd during a playoff game. Maybe we need to come up with a chant for Lucas to be heard at theaters across the nation.

      "NERD ABU-SER! NERD ABU-SER!"

      Of course any chant with Jar-Jar's name in it wouldn't be worth the breath it expelled...so we'll leave him out of it!

    4. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're like abused wives. You keep coming back for more, even though it hurts.

      <sarcasm>Yeah, damn those abused wives. It's their fault...</sarcasm>

    5. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by jonabbey · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I think Lucas wants to go the boiling frog route. You know, throw in a quick shot by Greedo here, a new digital background there, then keep turning up the crap until Jar-Jar in the original Star Wars (the new, 'Complete Vision' edition) is just another minor sacrilege.

    6. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Please mod the parent down for extreemly poor taste.
      <br>
      Anyone who could consider this a "Funny" quip, really doesn't know the reality.

    7. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by flewp · · Score: 2

      I hear yelling Jar Jar Binks in a crowded movie theater is no worse than yelling fire.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    8. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by zootread · · Score: 0

      Anyone who could consider this a "Funny" quip, really doesn't know the reality.

      Yeah, the Star Wars nerds can't help it, they're in love with Star Wars.

      --
      Zoot!
    9. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by quakeroatz · · Score: 0

      This may be true, but one who uses visible tags is even worse.

    10. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Are you defending abused wives, or abused star wars fans?

    11. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by grytpype · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, you SW nerds should be on Maury.

      Maury: How did it feel when you saw how much Episode 1 sucked?

      Nerd: Ah felt betrayed, and ah felt abused. He abused me like ah was a wet food stamp!

      Maury: But you stood in line for weeks to be the first nerd to see Episode 2!

      Nerd: [Nods, weeping]

      Maury: Well, why do you keep going back to him?

      Nerd: Because ah LOVE him! I LOVE George Lucas!

      --

      - Have a picture

    12. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, smart fuckin' move. Watch him come back with a gun and pop a cap in your ass while you're stupidly waving a sword around.

    13. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by brokenbeaker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "You're like abused wives. You keep coming back for more, even though it hurts"

      Is there any need to show this degree of insensitivity to abused women?

    14. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i couldnt agree more. naturally, my reasoning is in the amount of clothing she wore throughout the first movie, and notice how much was there by the end of the second. How much would she wear in episode 6?

    15. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not historical revisionism - it's FICTION!! c'mon get a grip - the world is on the brink of nuclear war and this shit matters????

    16. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by oni · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      my .3006 will scare you

      an M-1?

    17. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by eison · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      is competition good, or is duplication of effort bad?
    18. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by oni · · Score: 0, Troll

      and I scared him off with my katana.

      don't listen to those other replies. I think u did a good thing.

    19. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice!

    20. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      The difference of course being, he has to come back. And once he does that, he's making threats on your life an can be arrested. I think the guy did a good thing, sure it might have been better if he was armed with a rather large firearm, but it got the desired results, the girl was left alone (and hopefuly will avoid the guy from now on) and the guy shit his pants.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    21. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      Of course now in addition to whatever frustrations he was taking out on her will be the humiliation of being scared off by a nerd with a sword, so he will beat her more somewhere else.

    22. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      The parent of this thread was in exteemly poor taste. I am rather open when it comes to people expressing "humor" and opinions in potentialy offensive ways, but when I read the original post, the hairs on the back of my neck stood straighter than a telephone pole.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    23. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I hear yelling Jar Jar Binks in a crowded movie theater is no worse than yelling fire.

      Not only is that not funny, it doesn't even make sense.

    24. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by global_diffusion · · Score: 1, Troll

      Are you thinking what I'm thinking?

      Natalie Portman / Carrie Fisher lesbian scene!

    25. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so if you have no money and a couple of kids and live in a small town, how are you supposed to escape some abusive nutcase? most abused women feel trapped. some of them wouldn't even get any support from their family if they broke up the marriage.

      freakin' idiots around here keep labelling empathy and compassion as "political correctness."

      what if he'd said "star wars fans are like rape victims, they keep asking for it." sounds about the same to me...

    26. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw dat. What about that black number with the tight corset.

    27. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you thinking what I'm thinking.

      That the goblin assault on this world is about to being, and we will soon be ruled by the minions of JKBuhfgasdf, the seventh demon of the jomi realm. Absolutely!

    28. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by grytpype · · Score: 2

      More likely, we're going to have Portman standing next to Anakin/Vader and Obi-Wan in that last scene where they appear to Luke in spirit form so they can smile and nod at him.

      --

      - Have a picture

    29. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by MouseR · · Score: 2

      That would be stupid. She's never been reported to having the Force.

      Unless Anaking has some serious saber powers which Lucas didn't tell us about.

    30. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... especially when they misspell the visible tag

    31. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by grytpype · · Score: 2

      Well, you've got me there. But you have to admit it's more likely than a girl-on-girl scene with Carrie Fisher, right? I mean, have you seen what Carrie looks like lately?

      --

      - Have a picture

    32. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by BadTuna · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Who's the moderator who thought this comment warranted a 4 and thought it was funny? I guess each spends to much time sucking on their monitors.

      --
      Your sig here!
    33. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by BadTuna · · Score: 1

      Gee now it's a 5

      --
      Your sig here!
    34. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by JJ22 · · Score: 1
      Course, you old George would digitally age her to look like Aunt Beru.

      "Aarrgh! That'll be replacin' the whale in me nightmares!"

    35. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Fesh · · Score: 2

      Actually... The more I think about it, the less I'm convinced that the change was made to make Han a more likeable character... Seems to me that his dialogue with Jabba in the hangar would be a little more of a non-sequitur than it already is without that detail.

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
    36. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you have to admit it's more likely than a girl-on-girl scene with Carrie Fisher, right? I mean, have you seen what Carrie looks like lately?

      I'm assuming that they shot Carrie's part of the scene when they were filming Return of the Jedi. This is all planned ahead youn know. Now they film Natalie and put the two together. Not easy perhaps but worth the trouble.

    37. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by edbarrett · · Score: 1
      That would be stupid. She's never been reported to having the Force.

      And C3PO and R2D2 forgot they were built by Darth Vader.

    38. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by logicnazi · · Score: 2

      at first I thought this was just an incredibly stupid comment now I realize it is just a bad joke aimed at star wars fans

      --

      If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

    39. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HEY! I Resemble that remark

    40. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by The_dev0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Good on you buddy! Don't listen to these skirts, they've watched too many movies. Dead shits like him that beat their women are generally pussies when thrown in the mix with a real bloke anyway.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    41. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by dSV3Hl · · Score: 1

      Are you thinking about hot grits? :)

      --
      -- [ta]
    42. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by brianber · · Score: 1
      And C3PO and R2D2 forgot they were built by Darth Vader.
      R2D2 wasn't built by Anakin. And there is a simple solution for the droids' lack of memory: "Format and Reinstall"
    43. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well its quite simple that only a very select few knew that Vader is/was Anakin. So C3PO would not have a problem remembering who his maker was, he just thought he was dead.

    44. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      I'd pay more to see Lucas 'punishing' our Natalie...

      Hmm...quite disturbed really.

      -Nano.

    45. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by cyberon22 · · Score: 1

      The change was made to make the scene consistent with the rest of the saga. Attackers always lose. Always.

      And Greedo lost big time.

    46. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by SparkyMartin · · Score: 1

      You're posting on Slashdot and you're accusing OTHERS of being nerds????

      Better look in the mirror dude!

    47. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by matrix29 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're like abused wives. You keep coming back for more, even though it hurts.

      Damn and I was hoping in Episode 3 we find out Jar Jar Binks is actually the thinner version of Jabba the Hut. I figure Jar Jar (once he realized how badly he screwed over the Federation and after he grew a conscience) started over-eating to subsume his growing guilt, started a black-market trading operation to undercut the Empire financially, and finally lost his mind when he started eating his Queen Amidala dancer-substitute. Face it folks - Jar Jar is Jabba the Hut. Once you accept it, all of it makes sense.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    48. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by shadowbearer · · Score: 0


      Bluffing with a deadly weapon is always better than using it.

      Then again, you do have to make sure that the person you're bluffing
      is not going to rip it out of your hands and kill you with it...

      To state it baldly: get some training, if you're really going to
      wave it around.

      Personally: Kudos, man. Fighting off a bully who will beat a defenseless
      person means you use any means available.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    49. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by lucky_duck · · Score: 0

      I don't give a crap to what any of you say...you're all going to buy it anyway! I have the original trilogy and the remakes and I'm sure as hell going to buy another remake if it's made.

    50. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, calling abused wives stupid. I'm glad so many other slashdotters think so too.

    51. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • You're like abused wives. You keep coming back for more, even though it hurts.

      This is so insightful that it makes me wish for a moderation of "Troll, +1"

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    52. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Flakeloaf · · Score: 1

      I can just see him coming back with a gun and capping me, only he'll decide a few years after the fact that I really should've shot at him first & edit the security camera tape to make it look that way.

      --

      Am I the only one who heard Roxette to sing "I'm gonna get blitzed for some sex"?

  2. Maybe interesting... by bluprint · · Score: 2, Insightful

    who wants to see the exact same movies re-released anyway? Just rent the tapes....

    --
    A modern day witchhunt.
    1. Re:Maybe interesting... by damiangerous · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Just rent the tapes....

      You know, I'd buy them, if only I could. But you know what? I can't. I can buy the new versions of 4,5 and 6, but not the original versions. Lucas won't sell the originals anymore. So, no money from me, George.

    2. Re:Maybe interesting... by ralico · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well.... it would be nice to have the original content of IV-VI on a legal DVD (as opposed to the bootlegs )

      I, for one, curl my lip every time I see Greedo make that first shot. What was he trying to do?

      --

      SCO to Hell
    3. Re:Maybe interesting... by hyperizer · · Score: 1

      who wants to see the exact same movies re-released anyway? Just rent the tapes....

      Except, unfortunately, you'll never be able to see Star Wars as it was originally released (granted, in mono, but a slightly different cut, with the "Episode IV: A New Hope" line missing from the opening crawl). And I'll bet you'll never see the non-special editions on DVD, which means you can only get them in digital format if you track down the old laserdiscs. Am I the only fan who hopes George Lucas releases the original versions as a DVD option? Anyone hear any rumors to that effect?

    4. Re:Maybe interesting... by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1


      Check out your local garage sales for original Star Wars tapes, or sometimes even video rental stores will have a sale of a bunch of old tapes, and you might be able to find an old one in there somewhere. I'm sure there are plenty copies out there, they just have to be found.

    5. Re:Maybe interesting... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      It's my understanding (correct me if I'm wrong) that in the original Star Wars movie there's no mention of it being 'Episode 4'. My memory is hazy on the point, of course, as I only saw it once, in the theatre in 1977, and haven't seen a single one of the other shows since then.

      Disney won't sell 'Song of the South' either- but you can get ahold of it if you try.

    6. Re:Maybe interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called EBay. (Get a LaserDisc Player and the original THX disks for maximum quality.)

    7. Re:Maybe interesting... by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Not a chance! Lucas is going to cut up ANH and the original trilogy as much as he can to support the idea that he had the plot for the entire saga worked out, even though it's very clear the first trilogy (EP1,2,3) is just tacked on to 4,5,6.

    8. Re:Maybe interesting... by JWW · · Score: 2

      You think I'm going to sell my original tapes at a garage sale? Think again.

    9. Re:Maybe interesting... by fabjep · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. It says so at the top of the opening yellow distance-scrolling text.

      --
      - learn mathematics - shoot dope -
    10. Re:Maybe interesting... by Medevo · · Score: 1

      If Lucas is a greedy as everyone makes him out to be, then it would make sense to release as many different versions onto DVD as possible. This would allow us geeks to get the version of start wars we want, while still appeasing the general public with the digitally modified and improved version. This might even result in lower prices if there are 3 DVD's of each movie put out (Original, Special edition, post Episode III modified version).

      As much sense as this makes, perhaps this will just be a oversight to Georges greed, and he will just go on and release whatever he wants, completely ignoring everyone.

      In my opinion the day that Lucas finally allows the people that understand star wars to work on the movie, will be a great day of celebration on slash dot, however that day might come when George dies

    11. Re:Maybe interesting... by ParticleGirl · · Score: 2

      Actually you're right. It was originally named Star Wars but was renamed "Episode IV: A New Hope" when the sequels were picked up. That's also when Lucas had to come up with backstory enough to write two more episodes to follow the original, and the idea for the prequels seems to have sprouted in his knobby little head.

      --
      Do something about world hunger. Click here
    12. Re:Maybe interesting... by BigBir3d · · Score: 2

      Actually, the first release of Star Wars, Episode 4, it did not have any mention of "Star Wars: A New Hope," but when it was re-released in '79, it had that added to the scrolling intro.

      It is about as significant as the renaming of Return of the Jedi, orginally called, "Revenge of the Jedi." I have a copy of the old trailer here.

    13. Re:Maybe interesting... by Anomolous+Cow+Herd · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What was he trying to do?

      To me, it feels like an attempt to eliminate the moral ambiguity of Han Solo. In making Greedo shoot first, Solo was no longer the agressor; he was merely defending himself. To me, this takes away a lot from the original movie, where Solo was more or less portrayed as a sketchy character in the tradition of film noir flicks. The very things that make most characters interesting is their unpredictability that is derived from an unclear vision of their moral convictions.

      To put it bluntly, characters who are purely good or purely evil are very boring.

      --

      "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." - George Bush
    14. Re:Maybe interesting... by bytor4232 · · Score: 1

      You should have taken him seriously:

      Own the origionals, for the last time

      You think he was kidding with that ad campaign?

      --
      -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
    15. Re:Maybe interesting... by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      It does now. It did not during the original theatrical release.

    16. Re:Maybe interesting... by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      I doubt Lucas would release the originals as stand-alone DVDs, but maybe they will release the films in two (or 3) disk sets, each one containing the original on one disk and the rerelease on another. If he indeed does a "final version", then they could be 3 disk sets containing the original, the first rerelease and the final rerelease.

      Sound unlikely? Well, Criterion released a 3-disc version of Brazil which has several different cuts of the movie...

      If he did it, he'd probably release the sets 6 months after releasing the "final rerelease" versions as standalone dvds, to maximize profits due to the hardcore fans buying it twice.

    17. Re:Maybe interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, maybe this is just a smoke screen for an ep7? A way to tie up loose ends using one or two of the novels as the basis for a screenplay? (Have Speilberg direct) Portman and (what's his name?) could play Han and Leia's kids? Lucas has said several times that he will not make 3 more movies taking place after ep 6, but perhaps he's filming some scenes to keep his options open to make one more?

    18. Re:Maybe interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or order the vcd's...

    19. Re:Maybe interesting... by |/|/||| · · Score: 1

      Well, I hope something like this happens. I'd be willing to buy the whole set just to get the original trilogy on DVD.

      I wouldn't shell out a single buckazoid for some silly rehash on its own. Maybe after I have the originals on DVD I would consider buying the special edition(s), but certainly not before.

      In fact, I believe I will refrain from purchasing Episodes 1,2, and 3 until I can get the originals.

      I'm thinking that I'm waiting in vain, and it's beginning to piss me off.

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    20. Re:Maybe interesting... by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 2

      The original "Revenge of the Jedi" only appeared on some pre-released action figures and posters and such. The name was changed to "Return of the Jedi" prior to its first theatrical release.

      --

      "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

    21. Re:Maybe interesting... by batwingTM · · Score: 1

      In the very first release of the film it did not contain any reference to Episode IV. that wasn't added until it became clear that it would be a successful movie.

      --
      Leg Godt!
    22. Re:Maybe interesting... by turbod · · Score: 1

      Heh, youz guyz speak for yourself. I gots all three of the original on LD widescreen (pre-THX rehacking) & a dual gig MacG4 with all the DVD burning goodies :) Sorry, it will be a close friends only release...

      A chunk of culture because of a bit of pre-sight? Nah, I was just a loser who spent all my money on AV equipment in college!

      Now I write drivers and get mad equipment to do it on!

      TurboD

    23. Re:Maybe interesting... by cheese_wallet · · Score: 2

      I suppose it could be that (the self defense argument). But in the real world, just pointing a gun at somebody is considered "the use of deadly force" and I do mean "use".

      So, from and adult point of view, Han was morally free to shoot greedo at anytime while greedo was pointing the gun at him.

      From a childs point of view, having greedo shoot first was maybe a way of making that point more clear.

    24. Re:Maybe interesting... by PacoTaco · · Score: 1
      If George Lucas could actually write, the first three episodes wouldn't feel "tacked on." For example, why do the droids need to be in there at all? Now he needs to have some stupid memory erasure happen.

      Overall, it's very disappointing.

    25. Re:Maybe interesting... by BinxBolling · · Score: 2
      If Lucas is a greedy as everyone makes him out to be, then it would make sense to release as many different versions onto DVD as possible. This would allow us geeks to get the version of start wars we want, while still appeasing the general public with the digitally modified and improved version.

      Not necessarily. Surely there are some fixed costs associated with each version that you want to release. The 'untouched original' version may not sell enough extra copies beyond what would have been sold anyways to recoup those costs. How many people that would prefer the original will break down and buy the modified version if the original isn't available?

    26. Re:Maybe interesting... by monksp · · Score: 1

      Han and Leia never had kids in the original continuity, at least of what I remember reading. A friend of mine had a copy (Or what he said was a copy, but then, the guy had a ton of connections) of the Journal of the Whills, and the Jedi twins were nowhere to be seen.

      One of the reasons that Lucas said the third trilogy would never be made was the fact that Zhan's books took the setting in a direction that was never intended, and it had created such a following in the SW community that he didn't want to damage that, and wasn't willing to change what he had originally planned to mesh with that storyline.

      --
      -- My work here is done. If you need me again, just admit to yourself that you're screwed, and die.
    27. Re:Maybe interesting... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      To me it just means Solo was slower & luckier than in the original. If I know for an absolute certainty that someone is about to kill me, I'd be a total idiot to wait for him to shoot first! What if Greedo didn't miss?

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    28. Re:Maybe interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is true. But the first trailer was for Revenge, not Return of the Jedi.

    29. Re:Maybe interesting... by Medevo · · Score: 1

      that is a very good point

      Whatever happens, it wont be what the fans want, that i know for sure

      Medevo

  3. I thought she was dead. by UnhandledException · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Didn't Leia say, "She died when I was very young." Wait, they're not going to make her a jedi-ghost, are they?

    1. Re:I thought she was dead. by Triskaidekaphobia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If Obi-Wan lied to Leia about her brother then he could have lied about her mother as well.

      That said, Lucas is incredibly naive if he thinks anyone is going to accept Jar-Jar being added to Ep IV. Personally, I think AICN has been fooled yet again.

    2. Re:I thought she was dead. by GenericJoe · · Score: 1

      Didn't Luke say the same thing about his father?

      Hey, maybe she'll be the new Dark Lady of the Sith or something...

      GenericJoe

    3. Re:I thought she was dead. by stipe42 · · Score: 1

      Well Luke thought his father was dead, so why not his mother too? Darth Padme will be in a black leather get up complimenting Vader's attire. And don't forget the computer generated Leia-Padme lightsaber battle.

      stipe42

    4. Re:I thought she was dead. by Saint+Nobody · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and luke thought his father died when he was very young, too. what's you're bloody point?





      SPOILER
      luke's father isn't dead. he wnet to the dark side and became darth vader.

      --
      #define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}
      F(#define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}%cF(%s))
    5. Re:I thought she was dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well of course it wont be computer generated - they'll use the same actors - mind they'll have to send padme away on a long sub-light time-dialated trip to explain the apparent age differences (oh yeah that and the accident with the wrinkling ray)

    6. Re:I thought she was dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In all reality, we don't know if she is talking about her real birth mother, Padme, or her adoptive mother, Bail Organa's Wife.

    7. Re:I thought she was dead. by brain-in-a-box · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they can clone thousands of storm troopers, we shouldn't they clone Luke Skywalkers mother, too ?
      This will result in a funny scene:
      Yoda: If he fails everything is lost.
      Obi-Wan ghost: No, there is still his sister.
      And if she gets screwed, we can still clone them 1384 times.

      --
      You are the dot in slashdot !
    8. Re:I thought she was dead. by unicron · · Score: 1

      We're getting DEEP into nerdism here(Yuzhan Vong, Ben and Anakin children, the works)but Leia may be refering to her adopted mother on Alderan. I'm not sure if she ever even knew she was adopted, so it's a possibility.

      It's interesting to note that while Vader does know he had a child, it isn't until he reads Luke's mind in ROTJ does he realize he had twin children.

      It's even further interesting to note that during Luke's scenes in Jabba's lair, a bounty hunter and Jedi apprentice named Mara Jade was also their, acting under orders from Admiral Palpatine to kill Luke. She wasn't granted access to Jabba's slave barge when it journeyed to the Sarlac, so she was forced to leave. She later ends up marrying Luke and having children that can force grip as infants. Even grip beings immune to the force.

      I know, I'm a dork. But man do I feel at home here.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    9. Re:I thought she was dead. by ryepup · · Score: 1

      That would be the best possible way of including her in there. Any other way would just be insane. I mean, we all know her death is what's going to throw Anakin over the top to become Darth Vader.

    10. Re:I thought she was dead. by zeus_tfc · · Score: 3, Funny

      Darth Padme will be in a black leather get up complimenting Vader's attire.

      Natalie Portman in black leather... Mmmmmmmm...

      Uh, *Cough* Um, sorry, I was in a happy place there for a second.

      --
      "...At the end of the day"..."when everyone goes home, you're stuck with yourself." RIP Layne Staley
    11. Re:I thought she was dead. by UnhandledException · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Leia actually remembered her mother. I'm not sure if Luke ever knew either of his parents.

    12. Re:I thought she was dead. by r00tarded · · Score: 3, Funny

      like george wont hack that bit out and change it to "she was able to sell a lot of action figures and posters when i was very young."

    13. Re:I thought she was dead. by UnhandledException · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just want to say that that was a Hell of an outfit to wear to a "let's be friends" talk.

    14. Re:I thought she was dead. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Maybe they'll stick Portman on Aldaran and have her blown up in "A New Begining"

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    15. Re:I thought she was dead. by gid · · Score: 1

      Doh, hadn't really thought about that yet... thanks for spoiling it... I'm sure yer right, it makes lots of sense :(

      Although the previous mention of a leather clad Darth Padme does sound quite intriguing. Probably not gonna happen, but it does bring new meaning to "A New Hope".

    16. Re:I thought she was dead. by Gudlyf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I figured they'll insert Padme into that ghost sequence at the end of Return of the Jedi (where you see Yoda, Obi-Wan and Anakin waving to Luke as the celebration fireworks go off) *shrug*

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    17. Re:I thought she was dead. by nil_null · · Score: 1

      My guess is that they'll throw her in as a hologram recording.

    18. Re:I thought she was dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which of course, points us to a major plot flaw in the whole saga. why not just clone anakin, or yoda, and make a huge army of jedi masters?

    19. Re:I thought she was dead. by JWW · · Score: 2

      What? In Jedi, Leia refers to foggy memories of her mother... This means that her mother must have lived with her on Alderaan AFTER Anakin turned into Vader.

      His mother's death is what turns him over to the dark side. He's stared sliding down the dark path already.

    20. Re:I thought she was dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check the cover Rolling Stones magazine.....

    21. Re:I thought she was dead. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      The one with the bosoms and the heaving and the...

      Yeah. I'd be distracted too. Yum. : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    22. Re:I thought she was dead. by joib · · Score: 3, Funny


      We're getting DEEP into nerdism here

      To say the least... ;-)


      It's interesting to note that while Vader does know he had a child, it isn't until he reads Luke's mind in ROTJ does he realize he had twin children.

      I don't see any inconsistency here. Anakin bangs wife -> wife gets pregnant. Even Anakin should understand that his wife is pregnant even if she wouldn't tell him, no matter how dim-witted he is. And seing how he acted in "Attack of the clones", that is plenty dimwitted indeed. Anyway, so Anakin joins Palpatine (hey, I would too if I'd get that cool black helmet with The-breathing-sound) and leaves Padme. Or maybe Padme dumped Anakin? You know, maybe she wasn't satisified, or she was plain weirded out when Anakin fingered her with that robotic hand (you can see the robot hand at the end of "attack of the clones")? ;-D

    23. Re:I thought she was dead. by shrik3 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Emperor had clones of himself in the comics, so It's been done. And maybe it is in his best interest to keep a monopoly on the cloning industry to prevent the "good" Jedi from being cloned.

    24. Re:I thought she was dead. by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      Oh like this one:

      http://www.sithvixen.com

    25. Re:I thought she was dead. by juanfe · · Score: 1

      Yub nub, eee chop yub nub...

      --
      ***Foucault is watching you..***
    26. Re:I thought she was dead. by SnAzBaZ · · Score: 1

      I think padme will probably get killed/murdered in episode III, and this will push anakin over the edge to the dark side... maybe :)

    27. Re:I thought she was dead. by bitweever · · Score: 0

      Yub nub, eee chop yub nub...

      Hitomi hopi pachee...

    28. Re:I thought she was dead. by prizzznecious · · Score: 1

      Clones are inherently inferior to their natural counterparts, at least in the Star Wars universe. They have a tendency to be flaky to the point of insanity. An example of this would be Joruus C'baoth, the dark Jedi clone employed by Admiral Thrawn. Cloning Jedi would make for some very unstable people with some very frightening powers.

      --

      visit the hwky website for a lyrical genius infusion.
    29. Re:I thought she was dead. by QuasiDon · · Score: 1
      I think padme will probably get killed/murdered in episode III, and this will push anakin over the edge to the dark side... maybe :)

      I don't think this will happen. An earlier poster pointed out how Darth Vader knew he had a child, but didn't know he had twins, which implies that he was there for the conception (obviously), but left on his road to becoming Darth Vader before they were born, so he would not be there for her death, since that would have to happen after the twins were born. Yeah, I have probably put way too much thought into this. :)

    30. Re:I thought she was dead. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2
      If you haven't figured out that the guy who controls the narrative franchise can make up mean down, can completely ignore anything that compromises continuity, and in fact is in charge of logic, physics, and the Existence of God (all of which are subject to change at the drop of a quill), then you really haven't got it yet.

      There is no Leia. There is no Anakin. There is no C-3P0. There's only a bloated megalomaniac and the huge, uncritical fanbase that throws money at him.

    31. Re:I thought she was dead. by Tarkwyn · · Score: 2

      Didn't Leia say, "She died when I was very young." Wait, they're not going to make her a jedi-ghost, are they?

      She could still be alive. Maybe we're going to have Darth Natalie show up :)

      Perhaps after ROTJ, once everything has died down - BAM! out pops Darth Nat. She'd be more machine than woman, although probably have a much more fetching array of different black masks to wear.

      I'll stop now as I could very well end up eating these words...

      --
      Tarkwyn.
    32. Re:I thought she was dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a guy or a chick?

    33. Re:I thought she was dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Luke was told that Vader killed his father.

      "What I told you was true, from a certain point of view."

      It is entirely possible that Leia was lied to like Luke to keep her safe from Anakin.

    34. Re:I thought she was dead. by jafac · · Score: 2

      heh heh, "Bored Now" Padme. . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    35. Re:I thought she was dead. by spectatorion · · Score: 1

      i heard somewhere that what pushes anakin over the edge is obi-wan. anakin becomes fed up with being "underappreciated" (as he views it) and challenges his master to a duel. obi-wan knocks him into a volcano and only anakin's pure rage (and the strength it gives his dark side powers) saves him from dying, although his skin is damaged (hence the darth vader get-up). maybe i am mistaken...

      check here and here for details.

    36. Re:I thought she was dead. by discstickers · · Score: 1

      What if Padme gave the children to the Jedi for safe keeping, and didn't tell Anakin and the Emperor the whole truth. She dies at the hands of the Emperor (and before the eyes of Anakin) because she will not reveal the location of the children. She probably wouldn't indicate that there were twins either, so Vader thinks that there is only one.

      --
      I have a shitty sig!
    37. Re:I thought she was dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you listened to what Luke asks Leia in ROTJ, he says, "Leia, what do you remember about your mother? Your real mother, I mean?"

    38. Re:I thought she was dead. by matrix29 · · Score: 2

      Clones are inherently inferior to their natural counterparts, at least in the Star Wars universe. They have a tendency to be flaky to the point of insanity. An example of this would be Joruus C'baoth, the dark Jedi clone employed by Admiral Thrawn. Cloning Jedi would make for some very unstable people with some very frightening powers.

      And this would be bad for the Empire in what way?

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    39. Re:I thought she was dead. by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 2

      Minor nitpick:

      Leia said she remembered images and feelings. That her mother was "...kind, but sad."

      Now, Leia being very very strong in the force as we know she is, couldn't she have picked up these images as an infant, or even while in the womb?

      She had "always known" that Luke was her brother, after all.

      --

      "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

    40. Re:I thought she was dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Truce at Bakura is what happened immediately following ROTJ.

      The Dark Force [sith-ish] characters that I know of that come after ROTJ are:

      Emperor Palpatine (clone)
      Luke Skywalker
      Kyp Durron
      Exar Kun
      Joruus C'baoth

      Also, the thing about Amadala's death driving Anakin over the edge -

      If you time it so that she dies in childbirth...

      My prediction for Ep3:
      Anakin is away on a mission for the Jedi (as requested by Senator Palpatine). He knows that Padmé is pregnant. She goes into labor, he is messaged. Because he is so far away on this subplot, he can't make it back to be by her side. Obi-Wan is dispatched to be by her side. By this time the Sith have already done something to Padmé. She dies in childbirth, with Anakin en-route. Yoda & Obi-Wan feel the disturbance in the force, and decides to hide the 2 children and tell Anakin that there was a stillborn son (Luke, hence Vader's discovery in ROTJ). One gets sent to Tatooine (Lucas shot something for Ep3 during Ep2 production in Tunisia, suspect the adoption of Luke by Uncle Owen), the other to Alderaan (Senator Bail Organa doesn't like Palpatine too much). Anakin goes over the edge and blames Obi-Wan for her death (or something, cuz he's wickid pissed). Cue light saber battle between Obi-Wan & Anakin. At this point Ep1-Ep3 converge. Anakin's 10 years away from his mother and his inability to save her, the death of his love, the frustrations with the Jedi training, are all blamed on Obi-Wan. Anakin emerges from the lava, banished by the Jedi Order. The only one to lend a hand out to him is Palpatine. He becomes Vader.

      Of course there are some more details that are revealed here, such as:
      How clone troopers turned to storm troopers
      Political navigation and founding of the Empire
      etc.

      Also note that if Luke is around 20 yrs old in Ep4, and that Ep2 is 50 yrs before Ep 4, Ep3 should take place about 30 years after Ep2. The problem with this is that at this point Anakin should be around 49, and Padmé should be 54.

      Of course, this is based on something I heard about Ep1 taking place 60 yrs before Ep 4, which sounds a bit high.

    41. Re:I thought she was dead. by ryepup · · Score: 1

      Good call, I didn't think of that. She's gotta reject him at some point. I just see Lucas setting Padme up as Anakin's entire world, so when he gets the boot from her, that can't help. I do like how Anakin is showing all the traits that Yoda and the others warn are the path to the dark side throughout the movies.

    42. Re:I thought she was dead. by prizzznecious · · Score: 1

      They would be difficult to control. Just because they would be crazy does not mean that they would serve the empire.

      --

      visit the hwky website for a lyrical genius infusion.
    43. Re:I thought she was dead. by DarkManaX · · Score: 1

      Hell, maybe Aldaran is really naboo. Naboo really was a shitty name for a planet.

    44. Re:I thought she was dead. by Matarick · · Score: 0

      If Leia "knew" that Luke was her brother, why in Tatooine did she kiss him.

    45. Re:I thought she was dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well in the book in that book there is a scene with darth vader alone in his black sphere..he is trying to restore his lungs which he "said/thinks to himself" was ruined in a fire. he is only able to restore his lungs temporarly, seconds? and thinks his failure is due to the tiny spark of good left in him..which is forshadow to ROTJ where he is saved.

    46. Re:I thought she was dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well in the book ...forgot name of book...it took place between star wars and empire strikes back... in that book there is a scene with darth vader alone in his black sphere..he is trying to restore his lungs which he "said/thinks to himself" was ruined in a fire. he is only able to restore his lungs temporarly, seconds? and thinks his failure is due to the tiny spark of good left in him..which is forshadow to ROTJ where he is saved.

  4. I knew it.... by NetJunkie · · Score: 5, Funny

    As soon as Lucas said he was waiting for the new three to be released before putting the originals on DVD, I said he was going to do this. What will it be called, Super Special Edition? Speciai Edition Pro? 32-Bit Special Edition Turbo?

    1. Re:I knew it.... by flying_triguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about Star Wars Trilogy - XP

    2. Re:I knew it.... by TheDick · · Score: 1

      HAH, its like Street Fighter II.

      Star Wars Champion Turbo Battle.net edition.

      --

    3. Re:I knew it.... by Rams�s+Morales · · Score: 1

      I like "Special Edition Pro", but I think it will be "Midiclorian Enhanced Star Wars".

      Perhaps, it will be "Positive Chi Star Wars", or some other new age stuff.

      Anyway, I won't suffer anymore. Star Wars is dead since the phantom menace.

    4. Re:I knew it.... by phatStrat · · Score: 1

      What will it be called, Super Special Edition? Speciai Edition Pro? 32-Bit Special Edition Turbo?

      Super Turbo Championship Edition II Alpha.

      Rumors are that if you hit the 1UP button repeatedly, you'll be able to switch characters, Luke will be able to do Hadoken Force(TM) fireballs that travel in sine-waves across the screen at varying speeds, Chewy will be able to scroll upwards many screens before coming down with a 360 piledriver, and Leia will finally be able to kill off Stormtroopers with a single Super Upsidedown Spinning-on-Head kick.

      Oh wait... this isn't streetfighter.org?

    5. Re:I knew it.... by blankmange · · Score: 2
      Double Secret Edition (regards to Animal House) or

      Edition 'R' (big spoiler and exhaust pipe on it) or

      Director's Cut (any 3rd edition out there)

      --
      ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    6. Re:I knew it.... by InnereNacht · · Score: 1

      Hah.

      Star Wars Type-R with new "Kung-Fu Grip!" ?

    7. Re:I knew it.... by kylus · · Score: 1

      Nah...likely he'll want to follow other recently successful naming trends. Therefore it will be 'Special Edition XP'

      --
      --Kylus
      Idiot-proof something, and Life will build a better Idiot.
    8. Re:I knew it.... by Decimal · · Score: 2

      What will it be called, Super Special Edition? Speciai Edition Pro? 32-Bit Special Edition Turbo?

      Super Star Wars Alpha II Turbo... and I hear young Anakin will be playable as a secret character! Button mashers beware!

      --

      Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
    9. Re:I knew it.... by zericm · · Score: 1

      As soon as Lucas said he was waiting for the new three to be released before putting the originals on DVD, I said he was going to do this. What will it be called?

      Shit.

      --
      The welfare of the people has always been the alibi of tyrants. - Albert Camus
    10. Re:I knew it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is going to be called special edition XP

    11. Re:I knew it.... by isli · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about Star Wars Trilogy - XP

      for Xtra Portman...

    12. Re:I knew it.... by Sid+Meier's+username · · Score: 1

      Super Star Wars Episode IV-Pro Gold: A Special New Hope, Episode of the Year Special Edition.

    13. Re:I knew it.... by icejai · · Score: 0, Redundant

      PLEASE tell me the XP stands for Xtra Portman

    14. Re:I knew it.... by nathanh · · Score: 2

      Turbo Special Edition Alpha 2 Plus

    15. Re:I knew it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moo Money edition...

    16. Re:I knew it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I'll have to be patient and wait for RC1 to hit Kazaa...

    17. Re:I knew it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No your both wrong. Special Edition 3.0

    18. Re:I knew it.... by chrisos · · Score: 1

      Start Wars Enterprise Edition?

      --
      If nature abhors a vacuum, why isn't there more dust in the world?
    19. Re:I knew it.... by Thing+1 · · Score: 2
      As soon as Lucas said he was waiting for the new three to be released before putting the originals on DVD, I said he was going to do this. What will it be called, Super Special Edition? Speciai Edition Pro? 32-Bit Special Edition Turbo?

      Well, just look at the bright side -- Lucas waited.

      He could just as easily have milked close to twice the amount out of DVD owners (release now, then release again with new scenes).

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  5. But why??? by RayChuang · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not sure if this is even a good idea.

    It might work for continuity purposes (in George Lucas' mind), but frankly, most Star Wars fans prefer Episodes IV-VI to be as unchanged as possible even after Episode III is released. Lucas will be accused to overtinkering with the first Star Wars trilogy, and that won't win him friends among old-time Star Wars fandom, that's to be sure.

    --
    Raymond in Mountain View, CA
    1. Re:But why??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Old-time Star Wars fans don't buy the merchandise. The kids who JUST LOVE Jar Jar Binks do.

    2. Re:But why??? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      as much as I love star wars - I cant stand lucas... basically I see him as someone who's whole career is riding on the one good success he had - A new Hope, ep IV....

      He is *not* the genius visionary that all his buddies and hollywood ass kissers like to tell him he is - he just had one really good idea - but now he is just a greedy flipping bastard without imagination and vision. The star wars universe has been built up and expanded upon by the great fans that have loved the original seed that lucas planted and nurtured it into a mature and full concept - the only thing lucas does for the sar wars universe these days is capitalize on it.

      he is not a good director, he is just someone who stumbled onto something that became great - regardless of him. but he keeps his imperial grip on the concept and makes himself more and more into the palpatine we despise....

      /rant

    3. Re:But why??? by crimoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've been a Star Wars fan from day 1. Sure I'm annoyed with Jar Jar, and sure there are moments in EVERY episode that are corny, but I love the story - every version of it.

      Personally I would LOVE for Lucas to tinker with ANY episode that he wants to. Barring a complete rewrite of the story I'll be chomping at the bit to see what layers of the story can be added.

      If he blows it and introduces something new and corny I'll just watch my older VHS copy of the episode, no harm done. If he pulls a rabbit out of the hat and adds more depth, or better effects, or ties the story together better I'll eat it up.

      Star Wars isn't sacred and written in stone. It's just a story, one of the most epic stories ever told. Obviously as time goes on the story will grow (fan fiction, Lucas himself) and evolve (remastering, etc.). Given the advances in technology I'd love to see all of the episodes stiched together seamlessly. How many of us wouldn't want to fiddle with the originals if we were in Lucas' position?

    4. Re:But why??? by imr · · Score: 1

      ok he's not kurosawa, but he's one of the american directors who aknowledge kurosawa's work. Being able to recognize other people talent, and more, to aknowledge other people superiority, is a sign of talent.
      Also, you unkindly forget indiana johns (yes he was part of it) or ilm and its influence of todays american movies.

    5. Re:But why??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a little bitter?

    6. Re:But why??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Amen, brother. A-MEN!

      I am just a lowly AC, but must say that you have called the shot. Lucas is a one-trick-pony who has managed to milk it for all (more) than it was worth.

    7. Re:But why??? by Mr.+Biggles · · Score: 1

      Lucas didn't even have that one great idea, A New Hope wasn't written by him, all he did was convert it to a script and direct the films. "According to Lucas' original vision..." bleh, Lucas didn't have any vision, and even if he did it wasn't even close to original.

    8. Re:But why??? by p3d0 · · Score: 2
      I cant stand lucas... basically I see him as someone who's whole career is riding on the one good success he had...
      You know, the guy took a couple decades off to raise a family.
      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    9. Re:But why??? by Dan+D. · · Score: 2

      Yeah... and I'm sure there won't be a million copies of those sold either.

      --
      People who quote themselves bug the crap out of me -- Me.
    10. Re:But why??? by SamTheButcher · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It will be like the "New Coke". They'll introduce the new versions, there will be an outcry, and they'll release the "Super Classic" first trilogy. More money for everyone except us Star Wars geeks.

      I probly won't care about the tinkering so much as I'll be interested in seeing how he does it. But I'd prefer to have the *originals* on dvd as well as the "new & improved" versions.

    11. Re:But why??? by adrizk · · Score: 1

      that won't win him friends among old-time Star Wars fandom, that's to be sure

      No, but it will probably make him (more) millions of dollars.
      And, really, which would you rather have?

    12. Re:But why??? by lionchild · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. I know Lucas' is trying to build things to give positive role models for the kids of today. But as noted by JohnKatz in http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/05/ 25/0125219 , alot of kids these days are looking towards another direction for hero's to follow.

      Our unchanged Episodes IV-VI are just fine the way they are. Maybe touch them up, but don't dress them up. They still mean as much today as they did when we all saw them the first 7 times. They really aren't broken, George, please don't try to fix them.

      If there's a need to change the orginal works, why don't we just start over and re-film them with current actors, perhaps even be less confusing for the kids that Lucas' is trying to focus on?

      --
      Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
    13. Re:But why??? by CHUD-Wretch · · Score: 1

      ...and that won't win him friends among old-time Star Wars fandom...

      But he's already made his money off those people. New markets, new customers...

      Aren't kids are the primary target here?
      (and what timing! Their attention spans are shorter than ever!)

      --
      "Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names the streets after them."
    14. Re:But why??? by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2

      Lucas will be accused to overtinkering with the first Star Wars trilogy, and that won't win him friends among old-time Star Wars fandom, that's to be sure.

      It's too late for that. He already overtinkered with it when the Special Edition was released.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    15. Re:But why??? by txdadu · · Score: 1

      Also don't forget he is a plagiarist. I hate Jar Jar, not only because he is the most annoying character ever, but because Jar Jar and the whole Gundam race are ripped off from Larry Elmore. If you ever get a chance read SnarfQuest, a great comic from Dragon Magazine in the late 80's to early 90's. After you read it, tell me Snarf != Jar Jar, I'm sure you'll agree with me.

    16. Re:But why??? by buckeyeguy · · Score: 2
      It's generational... if Lucas hadn't made it big in movies, he'd probably be tinkering with some American Graffiti-style hot rods like many other men of his age (my dad included).

      Instead, he has some cool 'hot-rod' movies to tinker with, and with who knows how much unused footage just begging to see the light of day, he has the 'spare parts' ready to go.

      Or maybe he's just annoyingly insecure about his creations. Personally, I say that if he's going to tinker, I hope he digitally removes the entire Ewok race from ROTJ.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    17. Re:But why??? by ClickNMix · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd love to see new bits in the films, if they suck, I'll shrug and get another beer. If they are good, I'll smile, and get another beer, and watch it again.

      George Lucas has the luxury to be able to go back to his work and make it what he feels to be a better movie, I'd hope he doesnt give much thought to how much money he might make out of it, but rather he just wants to build -his- story to what he wants it to be.

      Perhaps in 20 years time and winkled and bent old Lucas will wheeze out a new 'clean cut' GeeWhiz-ROM and a whole new generation of people can complain about whats been TAKEN from the movie.

      --
      I saw the light at the end of the tunnel... But it was just someone with a flashlight bringing more work.
    18. Re:But why??? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      Being able to recognize other people talent, and more, to aknowledge other people superiority, is a sign of talent.

      Um, right. Either that or listening skills, anyway. Everyone knows how good Kurosawa was. The fact that lucas knows dosn't make ep1 and 2 any better.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    19. Re:But why??? by Anomolous+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1
      I'd much rather have friends.

      I don't think anyone wants to end up like Howard Hughes.

      --

      "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." - George Bush
    20. Re:But why??? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      The Special Edition mostly sucked. OK, some of the new stuff in New Hope was ok, but the touches to Empire didn't flow well, and I hate the new song that Jabba's band was singing in the new Jedi! I just hope my original VHS tapes never go pfft, even if the special effects were old.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    21. Re:But why??? by ajs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "[George Lucas] is *not* the genius visionary that all his buddies and hollywood ass kissers like to tell him he is"

      Heh, I always love to hear this kind of uninformed sillyness. It's what keeps me going.

      First off, as for directing, Lucas is good. He directs well, and his visual sense is utterly amazing. He's terrible at some things, and I would never rank him with someone like Kubrik or Hitchcock. There are, however, only a handful of people who can make a movie as physically engaging as episodes IV, V and II. Technically he does a good job.

      But no one sings Lucas' praises solely for his directorial work. The reason that he's refered to as a giant in the industry is the sheer number of times he's changed the way Hollywood works! You may have heard of the names Skywalker Sound, Lucasfilm, Lucas Arts, Pixar, ILM? These are all Lucas companies that have contributed hugely to the modernization of the movie-making industry. Having created any *one* of them would have been an achivement worthy of comment in Hollywood. Having created all of them is frankly stunning.

      There are also less... wholesome things that I credit the man with genius and visionary status for. He forsook pay on episode IV in return for merchandizing rights. He was frankly laughed at for asking for this, but the studio happily gave away the "worthless" merchandizing rights. No studio will ever be able to take that decision lightly again because it was George Lucas who showed Hollywood what those rights were really worth. That money paid to turn ILM and Lucasfilm into forces to be reckoned with in Hollywood and in turn founded Skywalker Sound, Pixar, and lots of other little companies as spinnoffs (can anyone remember the name of the medical imaging company that Pixar spun off?)

      You may or may not like or respect Lucas, and that call is all yours, but I think genius visionary is a title that can be safely awarded to anyone who slaps Hollywood to its senses and ushers in the age of digital effects and later digital film making.

    22. Re:But why??? by hcduvall · · Score: 1

      He wasn't the only one to acknowledge Kurosawa...and didn't he deny it for years? As soon as the hype around the movies grew beyond its humble serial-inspired beginnings, Lucas's ego grew with it. Once upon a time he had that ability to recognize talent. That's why so many of the movies he helped create but didn't direct are so well remembered. e's great a plot or story creation, after that he needs spielburg, kirshner, and the like to make it. I think AotC succeeds with its set pieces and the glimpses of bladerunner or fifth element, or gladiator/monster flicks. And the old mainstay for Lucas of the John Ford western. With most directors I'd call it inspiration, influence, or homage. But with Lucas it feels like theft... As for ILM, I'm a little bit sad. His devotion to it has turned the story and characters, even the simpler archtypal ones, into 2nd class citizens in ovie-making, and technical achievement the main virtue. Its pretty, but movie making its not. Personally, I think the level of hostility thats being generated over this will prevent the rumor from coming true. And its his right to change it, and its his right to deny us the originals in dvd. But the problem is that we know that any he adds is only going to make it worse. Ah well. At least this time I was just bored instead of disgusted.

    23. Re:But why??? by Ty · · Score: 1

      mod this up and the parent (-1 ignorant fuckhead) down for christ's sake

    24. Re:But why??? by Krelnik · · Score: 4, Interesting
      > ...this kind of uninformed sillyness.

      > ...He directs well....There are, however, only a handful of
      > people who can make a movie as physically engaging
      > as episodes IV, V and II.

      How about practicing what you preach? Lucas did not direct V, Irvin Kershner did.

    25. Re:But why??? by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1
      If it bugs you that much, hell don't watch. I doubt they'll take away your VHS copies of Episode IV.

      --
      Display some adaptability.
    26. Re:But why??? by keymygrip · · Score: 0

      "If he blows it and introduces something new and corny I'll just watch my older VHS copy of the episode, no harm done. If he pulls a rabbit out of the hat and adds more depth, or better effects, or ties the story together better I'll eat it up."

      I am along the same lines as you on your post except for the fact that previous versions of Star Wars are no longer available when the new stuff comes out.

      I wish I had the older VHS tapes from the undoctored episode IV-VI but the fact is that I don't. What about people that had it but they are damaged or lost or something? Then those cannot be replaced and we are forced to watch the crap that Lucas is adding.

      In my opinion Lucas had not added a single thing to Star Wars to make it better. All of the re-releases did not add one bit of good to any of the movies. At best the new material did not detract from the originals.

      I wish Star Wars could be ripped from Lucas. I wish it were in more capable hands. But at the very least I wish that I could go to a store and purchase an untainted set of Star Wars tapes. It is bad enough that all this utter crap is being injected into something I liked so much, but not having a choice of which version I get just sucks.

    27. Re:But why??? by Rev+Snow · · Score: 1
      he just had one really good idea

      Yeah. It was called American Graffiti.

    28. Re:But why??? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      those are good points - but I would not be so quick to award all of the credit to lucas himself... there are many people involved in creating a movie - or special effect technologies that are as of yet un heard of... a good friend of my fathers is one of the original lucas employees and worked on creating methods for special effects... these people behind the scenes are the unsung geniuses behind what we see in movies today.

      its sad that hollywood just lumps a movie under the director... hollywood is so proud of itself, its a sick and disturbing industry which really teaches some fucked up values to society... it should not be held in such high regard.

      I would say that when lucas asked for the merchandizing rights that that was business genius, a spark of it anyway... but that does not translate directly into directorial genius.

      The problem I see with your statements that he is a genius due to the fact that he has had a major impact on the industry (which he has) - is that "he" as a sole single person can not - and should not - receive all the credit for what movies look like today. He has worked with some real genius minds in the industry - who behind the scenes form what we see in movies from imagination, but more and more I only see lucas as a tired old man struggling to maintain his power and image - yet he no longer has the nimble and creative imagination that may have been there way back when this all started....

      Im not saying that there have not been glimpses and moments of genius from him - there have been... however, I do not like him - as stated... but I do respect what he [the group of people that are "lucas arts"] has accomplished.

      I just dont like ego maniac greedy bastards...

    29. Re:But why??? by tgibbs · · Score: 1
      Given the advances in technology I'd love to see all of the episodes stiched together seamlessly.
      I agree. I see no problem with Lukas releasing a "Directors Cut" version. People are treating it like it's great literature, when even from the beginning it was basically a nostalgic retread of a bunch of science-fiction cliches. I think a lot of people's anger at George Lukas is simply misdirected regret that they've gotten older, and no movie, no matter how well done, will thrill them the way the original "Star Wars" did when they were 13 years old. I've gotten older too, and the new trilogy doesn't quite have the "oomph" of the original for me. But I do remember what it was like to be young well enough to know that if Lukas had released "Episode 1" first instead of "Episode 4," I'd still have thought it was about the best movie I'd ever seen.
    30. Re:But why??? by eam · · Score: 2

      Ok, but what you said seems to imply that I have as much talent as Lucas. After all, I recognize Kurosawa's talent & acknowledge his superiority.

    31. Re:But why??? by ipxodi · · Score: 1

      It's Lucas's story -- and it's his to do with what he wants. I am interested to see what, if anything, he adds to the movies when they hit DVD. Personally, I LIKED the additions to Episode 4. (well, except the Greedo-shoots-first-bit), For instance, the extra CGI animals/people/vehicles in the Mos Eisley scenes added some needed texture and depth to a set of scenes that didn't really show what was scripted. Mos Eisley is supposed to be a bustling spaceport in addition to a "wretched hive of scum and villany" but the original version has it looking like a one-horse town.
      So as far as I'm concerned, Lucas can go for broke. I hope he does it well of course, but if I don't like the changes, well too bad for me.

      --
      load "windows7" ,8,1
    32. Re:But why??? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      Never ceases to amaze me.

      DVD is not VHS tape. You can have both versions, maybe even 3 or 4, all on the same disc... ah, the wonders of random access.

    33. Re:But why??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digital films look like shit. My 16mm home movies have better black and color reproduction than ATOTC.

    34. Re:But why??? by orenmnero · · Score: 1

      Episode V was directed by Irvin Kirshner.

    35. Re:But why??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How about practicing what you preach? Lucas did not direct V, Irvin Kershner did.

      And on point with the argument against Lucas' overblown image is the fact that the one he didn't direct is also the best of the Star Wars movies so far.

    36. Re:But why??? by cicho · · Score: 1

      But nobody thinks they will.

      --
      "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
    37. Re:But why??? by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Sure, it's possible, but that doesn't mean they'll do it. His point still stands. They will release "new star wars" without any option on the disc to play it old style, and then, after an outcry, we will be treated to the classic one again.

    38. Re:But why??? by readc · · Score: 1

      He's terrible at some things, and I would never rank him with someone like Kubrik, or Hitchcock.

      I don't know much about Kubrik, but if you mean Stanley Kubrick, though, that analogy is right on par. But I 'll have to go see some of this Kubrik guys movies just to confirm this...

      --
      Da comp cant tell u da emotional story.It can give u da exact mathematical design,but whatz missin is da eyebrows. -FZ
    39. Re:But why??? by Teknogeek · · Score: 0

      >> He forsook pay on episode IV in return for merchandizing rights. He was frankly laughed at for
      >> asking for this, but the studio happily gave away the "worthless" merchandizing rights.

      You know, I think this explains the overmerchandising of Star Wars.

      "Fine, we were idiots...George, we know you gave you too much...George...George, stop hitting us with Jar Jar Binks action figures."

      --
      I mod down anyone who uses M$ in their posts. I like to live on the edge.
    40. Re:But why??? by Teknogeek · · Score: 0
      >> It will be like the "New Coke". They'll introduce the new versions, there will be an outcry, and they'll release the "Super Classic"
      >> first trilogy. More money for everyone except us Star Wars geeks.

      Except New Coke wasn't a marketing ploy.

      --
      I mod down anyone who uses M$ in their posts. I like to live on the edge.
    41. Re:But why??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You left out one of the companies he started, which has undoubtedly changed the way Hollywood works more than any company in the history of movies: Avid.
      To be exact, he didn't actually found the company, but at Lucasfilm they designed and built the worlds first electronic non-linear editing bay (NLE), and called it in pure Lucas fashion an "Edit-Droid". They sold the technology to a small newly founded company called Avid. Today, Avid is the de facto standard for editing anything from commercials to tv series to feature films.
      All that other stuff is gravy on how the audience experiences the movie (visual and aural enhancements), but this revolutionized the speed and practicality of film editing. Films can be made without visual effects and sound design, but every movie is edited (with the possible exception of TimeCode, which still had some hidden cuts).

    42. Re:But why??? by imr · · Score: 2

      ep1 is quite shitty, ok. ep2 is much better in term of writing than the rest of the lot.

    43. Re:But why??? by imr · · Score: 2

      your logic tricks, they dont work with me...

    44. Re:But why??? by eam · · Score: 1

      Wait, let me try again...

      ...My logic tricks do work on you...

    45. Re:But why??? by imr · · Score: 1

      for kurosawa I wasnt talking about this script influence thing, i didnt watch the movie some people talk about. so i cant have an opinion about it.
      No i'm talking about his recognition of kurosawa as a great director, along with spielberg i think.
      Whats pretty bad, i think, in the new trilogy is the acting direction. It's terrible. It was better this time, but what could have been worse than episode one in term of acting direction? And it was a shame, as if there is ONE thing that can't be reproched to the american movies is the quality of their actors. They really are incredible. The lowest action movie (i speak about scenario not budget or number of entries) has great actors. (too bad they mostly perform in action movies, too bad there mostly is only action movies, what a loss).
      But, I'm not as pessimistic about the rest.
      I completly agree with you about the technical side. I will even go further, tecnic is everywhere in movies, yes, too much, but more, it is misused. When I see 3D everywhere to create "realistic" events, that is regular but much better done special effects, I'm always a little sad, when they could be used to create poetry. (the full avatar of this wastefull trend: final fantasy.)
      But i had this strange feeling that ep2 was much better in term of writing than the rest of the lot. Most comments I read are quite unpleasant against that movie. Yet, i can't help to believe one character slowly rises up above all others, quietly, discreet and subtile, yet very present in a showing off way: queen amidala character.
      And this is no theft from any past work. and it is done in a very subtle way.
      Or beauty is in my eye only, but i don't think so.

    46. Re:But why??? by danox · · Score: 2

      I think he is insecure about it. From what I have gathered from interviews he was never really happy with the original three. He had to leave out stuff becasue he didn't have the technology to make it look good. What he never seemed to realise was that this fact introduced a new subtlety to his movies. Thing weren't so explicit and obvious. I don't think he has an appreciation for subtlety. so he always had this urge to add something more graphic and visual to his movies, and when he could, he did. I think insecurity is definately the driving force behind it. I think he looks back at the first 3 and wishes he could make them with the tech that he has today.

      --
      "Me and my girl named bimbo . . . limbo . . . spam" - Captain Beefheart.
    47. Re:But why??? by Kylow · · Score: 1

      Lucas has always said Episode IV was rushed. I saw an interview where he explained that he had many ideas for Episode IV, but was given limited resources, time and money with which to acchieve his vision, as he had not yet proved himself. It would be interesting to see the entire sexiligy (is that what you call it?) as he envisioned it 20 years ago.

    48. Re:But why??? by myklgrant · · Score: 0

      Not quite. American Grafitti was also an excellent idea/movie. Unfortunately he wasted that karma with Howard the Duck.

    49. Re:But why??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but nothing beyond the first paragraph is relevant to the original assessment of Lucas' film work. In your own words, he's a good director, an excellent businessman, revolutionary technologist and visionary merchandiser. That explains the poor scripts, crippling reliance on cutting-edge CGI and embarrasing creative gaffs such as Jar Jar and Ewoks, cinematic merchandising vehicles aimed more towards McDonalds drink cups than good moviemaking.

    50. Re:But why??? by zeno_2 · · Score: 2

      Nah.. lets see what movies he has put out:

      Star Wars: Episode III (2005) (executive producer)
      Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones (2002) (executive producer)
      ... aka Star Wars II (2002) (USA: promotional abbreviation)

      Adventures of Young Indiana Jones: Adventures in the Secret Service, The (1999) (V) (executive producer)
      Adventures of Young Indiana Jones: Masks of Evil, The (1999) (V) (executive producer)
      Adventures of Young Indiana Jones: Spring Break Adventure, The (1999) (V) (executive producer)
      Adventures of Young Indiana Jones: The Trenches of Hell, The (1999) (V) (executive producer)
      Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999) (executive producer)
      ... aka Phantom Menace, The (1999) (USA: short title)
      ... aka Star Wars I: The Phantom Menace (1999) (USA: video box title)
      Young Indiana Jones and the Attack of the Hawkmen (1995) (TV) (executive producer)
      Young Indiana Jones and the Treasure of the Peacock's Eye (1995) (TV) (executive producer)
      Radioland Murders (1994) (executive producer)
      Young Indiana Jones and the Hollywood Follies (1994) (TV) (executive producer)
      Leprechaun (1993) (co-producer) (uncredited)
      "Young Indiana Jones Chronicles, The" (1992) TV Series (executive producer)
      Wow! (1990) (V) (executive producer)

      Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989) (executive producer)
      Land Before Time, The (1988) (executive producer)
      Tucker: The Man and His Dream (1988) (executive producer)
      Willow (1988) (executive producer)
      Star Tours (1987) (executive producer)
      Inside the Labyrinth (1986) (executive producer)
      Howard the Duck (1986) (executive producer)
      ... aka Howard: A New Breed of Hero (1986)
      Captain Eo (1986) (executive producer)
      Labyrinth (1986) (executive producer)
      "Droids" (1985) TV Series (executive producer)
      ... aka "Droids: The Adventures of R2D2 and C3PO" (1985)
      ... aka "Star Wars: Droids" (1985)
      "Ewoks" (1985) TV Series (executive producer)
      ... aka "All New Ewoks, The" (1986) (new title)
      ... aka "Ewoks & Droids Adventure Hour" (1986) (new title)
      ... aka "Star Wars: Ewoks" (1985)
      Latino (1985) (executive producer) (uncredited)
      Ewoks: The Battle for Endor (1985) (TV) (executive producer)
      Ewok Adventure, The (1984) (TV) (executive producer)
      ... aka Caravan of Courage (1984) (TV)
      ... aka Caravan of Courage: An Ewok Adventure (1984) (TV) (UK: theatrical title)
      Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984) (executive producer)
      Twice Upon a Time (1983) (executive producer)
      Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi (1983) (executive producer)
      ... aka Return of the Jedi (1983) (USA: short title)
      ... aka Star Wars VI: Return of the Jedi (1997) (USA: video box title)
      Body Heat (1981) (executive producer) (uncredited)
      Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) (executive producer)
      ... aka Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) (USA: video title)
      Kagemusha (1980) (executive producer: international version)
      ... aka Double, The (1980)
      ... aka Kagemusha (The Shadow Warrior) (1980)
      ... aka Kagemusha the Shadow Warrior (1980)
      ... aka Shadow Warrior (1980)
      Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back (1980) (executive producer)
      ... aka Empire Strikes Back, The (1980) (USA: short title)
      ... aka Star Wars V: The Empire Strikes Back (1997) (USA: video box title)

      Star Wars (1977) (executive producer)
      ... aka Star Wars IV: A New Hope (1997) (USA: video box title)
      ... aka Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope (1977) (USA: new title)

      Rain People, The (1969) (associate producer)

      (sorry imdb the page this came from is here:
      http://us.imdb.com/Name?Lucas,+George).

      He also had part to do with THX, which I am glad for. Ive liked all the star wars movies, and I loved ep2, I guess its all just up to how you feel about all of it..

    51. Re:But why??? by red_crayon · · Score: 2

      Insightful? You must be fucking shitting me!!!!

      Take all my karma away. I don't care.

      First there was Jon Katz's puking piece yesterday, and now this Lucas-asslicking shill troll is "5-insightful"

      What is slashdot coming to?

      --
      "Never bullshit a bullshitter" All That Jazz
    52. Re:But why??? by Max+Nugget · · Score: 1

      Not only did he not direct Empire Strikes Back (which is the best of the Star Wars films IMHO), he didn't direct Return of the Jedi either. Richard Marquand directed that one. Personally, I find Episode IV very hard to sit through. Every time I watch it I can't help but wonder how well it would have done if it were first released sometime in the past few years (without any other Star Wars films being out). I'm sure it would have done decently, but I doubt it would have enjoyed the massive success it did in 1977.

    53. Re:But why??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been a Star Wars fan from day 1.

      Don't you mean day 4?

    54. Re:But why??? by nalfeshnee · · Score: 1

      well said that man.

      although: i thought TESB was better than the first film to be honest. more plot and less cardboardy characters.

      --

      -- Despair is an operating system that ANY human being can run, sort of a psychological JAVA --

    55. Re:But why??? by Bnonn · · Score: 1
      I don't see any evidence in your post that Lucas is a genius. I see evidence that he is a shrewd businessman who happens to have a moderate amount of skill in his chosen industry.

      He's not a good writer. He's an average director. As for vision...judging by the large number of "epic" films he's produced that flopped, my observation would be that his vision reaches no further than his bank balance.

    56. Re:But why??? by imr · · Score: 1

      it starts to work, i kinda start to believe socrate is a donkey ...not.
      sorry, greek logic tricks still don't work.

    57. Re:But why??? by eam · · Score: 2

      muttering Damn Lucas and his stupid "Jedi Mind Trick" seminar. There's 200 hundred dollars I'll never see again. /muttering

      Seriously, it does work on my sons:
      Me: You WILL clean up your room!
      Nick: I will clean up my room.

    58. Re:But why??? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      It would probably also have looked completely different, since a lot of things have changed since 1977. Obviously.

      If you are going to picture the movie released in 2002, you should also picture the movie as being adapted to becoming a hit in 2002 as well.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    59. Re:But why??? by ajs · · Score: 2

      Yes, you're right. But I was refering to Lucas' sense of visual style, and while I think he had less impact on that in VI, he certainly was a massive factor there in V. I knew what I was saying, and what the facts were, even if I wasn't as clear about it as I should have been.

    60. Re:But why??? by ajs · · Score: 2

      I would agree fully with your assesment. I wasn't trying to hype lucas up to be any more than that at all. To put it in the words of Zaphod, "he's just this guy, you know?"

    61. Re:But why??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, Return of the Jedi was directed by Richard Marquand

  6. HEY! by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jar-Jar is not UNIVERSALLY reviled: the Galactic Senate heartily approved of his proposal to grant Emp^H^H^HChancellor Palpatine emergency powers! Heck, even Anakin seems to like Jar-Jar, and we know what a hothead he can be. Don't you think Anakin would have dismembered Jar-Jar at the first opportunity if JJB was REALLY so reviled?

    Binks: A Future For Your Children. A Future For The Republic. Vote Today.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:HEY! by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

      > Exasperated French Unix guru says, "man du!"

      I am French, and also an (old) Unix guru, even if I know what "man du" mean, I really don'T catch it !
      Would you explain please !

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    2. Re:HEY! by erasmus_ · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you're trying to be funny. Otherwise I'm finding it hard to explain why you'd confuse reality (Star Wars is imaginary. Fans hate Jar Jar, a fictional character) with fiction ("Galactic Senate" loves Jar Jar).

      --
      Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
    3. Re:HEY! by cryms0n · · Score: 1

      I think it's like:

      "mon dieu!" (if I spelled it correctly)

    4. Re:HEY! by elmegil · · Score: 1

      a common caricature of frenchmen has them swearing "Mon Dieu!" all the time. Which means "my God!"

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    5. Re:HEY! by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

      Ok, but "man du!" really dont sound like "Mon Dieu!" :-)

      And, actually, French Unix Guru may said more likely something like "Putain de bordel de merde!" :-)

      And don't ask for the translation, I will NOT give it " :-)

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    6. Re:HEY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I thort it was dead funny when Jar-Jar moronically proposed mandating the creation of an army of stormt^h^h^h^h^h clones and granting limitless executive powers to that nice senator Palpatine. Watch carefully in the previous scene and you'll see how Palpatine manipulates him into doing it, too. I warmed to the idea that Lucas is saying something about how being a guileless thimblewit makes you the deserving bitch of evil politicos, which is about as devastating a critique of Jar-Jar's sanctified-cretin persona as I can imagine...

    7. Re:HEY! by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Whore of bloody hell

    8. Re:HEY! by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

      This is the Babelfish translation, this is not the good translation. Like an old italian proverb said : "Traductor tradictor" : "The translator is a traitor".

      But, anyway the translation give an overview of the real thing :-)

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    9. Re:HEY! by Jhan · · Score: 1
      Jar-Jar is not UNIVERSALLY reviled...

      Yeah, I know. Even since I first heard his strange idiom, I kept hearing in my mind "Masta! Meesa hony!" Imagine his long, supple tounge wrapping around your... whatever... and perhaps reaching all the way into your... dunno...

      ;-)

      --

      I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

    10. Re:HEY! by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      Lengthy explanation:

      "man du" is a Unix command meaning "show me the manual page for the 'du' command". 'du' is a command to show the amount of space used by files. If you pronounce it in a certain way, it sounds like "Mon dieu!" which is a generic French exclamation meaning "My god!" It's something a stereotypical Frenchman might say when he is exasperated, amazed, surprised, etc.

      Of course, there's the old saying that if you have to have a joke explained to you, it ceases being funny. *sigh*

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    11. Re:HEY! by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      >>Putain de bordel de merde!
      Whore of bloody hell

      How do you get that? OK, Putain is whore, but a bordel is a brothel and merde is shit.

    12. Re:HEY! by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

      I really think that source code can be internationalized but not joke !

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    13. Re:HEY! by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Palpatine loves him!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    14. Re:HEY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In modern Italian it is: "Traduttore, traditore."

    15. Re:HEY! by MouseR · · Score: 2

      Well, I'm french. And "man du" nowhere near comes close to be pronounced like "mon dieu".

      Besides, in Québec, we'd apreviate this to a word that starts with "tabar" and ends with "nac".

      But that too wouldn't be funny if I'd explain it to you.

    16. Re:HEY! by scotti · · Score: 1

      We can always hope they replace Greedo with Jar Jar in IV.

    17. Re:HEY! by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Douglas Adams once told me his favourite multi-lingual joke:

      A Gendarme is patrolling Paris, when he glances down an alley, and sees a man standing at the end of the alley, with his back to the Gendarme, and his hands in front of his groin.

      The Gendarme calls out "Monsieur! Defence de pisser!"

      The man replies, "Je ne pisse pas! Je m'abuse!"

      To which the Gendarme replies, "Ah...vive le sport!"

      Tim :)

    18. Re:HEY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you suck

    19. Re:HEY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't you think Anakin would have dismembered Jar-Jar at the first opportunity if JJB was REALLY so reviled?"

      What a great plot idea for Episode III!

    20. Re:HEY! by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

      Mayby it's an multi-lingual joke, but it really fun when people really know all the British culture and the British thinking.

      - I really think that source code can be internationalized but not joke !

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
  7. So... by rde · · Score: 2

    So this means that our beloved RotJ is going to be ruined by annoying creatures added in to appeal to the kids? Nooooooo!

    Next thing you know, he'll follow it up with a movie called Jar Jar : The Battle for Naboo, which'll be inane, cute and a travesty of... oh, wait.

    1. Re:So... by Tin+Weasil · · Score: 1

      The Ewoks movie really wasn't that bad was it?
      I mean... didn't you see the Star Wars Christmas special back during the 70's?

    2. Re:So... by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      The Ewoks weren't that bad, but think about how cool the alternative would've been, if Lucas hadn't been so keen on kiddie merchandising: Imagine Endor being a planet of Wookiees instead of Ewoks (ewok is kind of derivative of the word wookiee). Imagine a plausible insurrection of giant wookiees, cooperating to take out the storm troopers. Instead, we got this stupid slapstick ewok shit.

  8. No need for hysteria by ShawnDoc · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The main rumor is that Portman will film a "flashback" scene to be inserted into ROTJ when Luke asks Leia if she remembers her mother. (Implying that Leia was born a few years before Luke)

    Personally, I like the idea of this. It helps tie all 6 movies together and makes them seem like the series they are supposed to be. I mean, its not like he's totally changing the movie like he did with ANH and the Greedo scene.

    1. Re:No need for hysteria by Xaoswolf · · Score: 1
      A short flashback showing portman would be a nice addition. A scene with Jar Jar talking to the Rebels(or perhaps the Emporer that he gave the power to) would be pushing it a little. As long as George Lucas uses common sense, then there should be little or no problem.

      It's the part about him using common sense that concerns me, I'm not too sure he has that much left...

    2. Re:No need for hysteria by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      I wonder, could somebody actually watch all the movies in sequence without nitpicking the last 3 to death between the story and the special effects (or lack of).

    3. Re:No need for hysteria by True_Seeker · · Score: 2, Funny
      (Implying that Leia was born a few years before Luke)


      But then how could they be twins? That would be one heck of a labor!
    4. Re:No need for hysteria by Medevo · · Score: 1

      It's the part about him using common sense that concerns me, I'm not too sure he has that much left...

      If other examples of George's uncommon sense serve to show a precedent, then we are all doomed


      A Closed mouth gathers no foot

      Never argue with a idiot for he may be doing the same thing

    5. Re:No need for hysteria by Ricdude · · Score: 2

      He could be added to the crowd in the Endor base strategy session with little difficulty, or loss of continuity.

      --
      How's my programming? Call 1-800-DEV-NULL
    6. Re:No need for hysteria by Cheeko · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except that Luke and Leia are twins. My guess is that in Episode 3, Obi-Wan takes Luke and Amadala takes Leia and they hide them, raise them etc. Likely Leia remembers her real mother cause she lived with her for a short time before her mother dies.

    7. Re:No need for hysteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could watch them in sequence, but George has screwed with the numbers, so now the first movie, the one that came out in 1977, is supposedly the fourth in the sequence. Fuck that.

    8. Re:No need for hysteria by kidyomo · · Score: 0

      So who the hell is going to play the Obi Wan? A CG Alec Guiness? An 'aged' McGregor? I don't know which would be worse!!

      --

      - posts may be recorded for legal or training purposes. Thank you for your co-operation.
    9. Re:No need for hysteria by hoggoth · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why is everyone assuming the worst?

      Perhaps Lucas wants to acknowledge what a mistake Jar-Jar is by giving the fans what they want.
      The new scene will have Jar-Jar as a groveling, mistreated, abused slave of the Emperor. The Emperor will be in a discussion with his heads of state while Jar-Jar crawls in on all fours carrying a drink for the Emperor. Obviously beaten and broken, Jar-Jar cringes at each movement of his master.

      Of course... since Jar-Jar is obviously a racial stereotype this may not go over so well...

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    10. Re:No need for hysteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But even Obi-Wan doesn't know that Luke has a sister until Yoda tells him. ((Ben)"That boy is our only hope...(Yoda) "No, there is another.") So, perhaps Yoda takes Luke and hands him off to Obi-wan. Or, Padme dumps him off on the Lars family herself. She's the only other person aware of the ties between the Lars family and Anakin. (As far as we the fans know). From there, Obi-wan finds out somehow and watches Luke from afar. Ah, pure speculation! Feels good!

    11. Re:No need for hysteria by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      Amidala will get framed by Palpatine saying she [planted Jar Jar|left her post] in the senate to start the war. Palpatine will use this to split Amidala and Anakin up - he swore an oath to the Jedi, and his duty is to the republic, etc.

      She'll go into hiding on Tatooine with the Lars family, where she'll discover that she's pregnant while Anakin is out being Palpatine's flunky after Dooku gets killed by Windu or Yoda.

      How the kids get split up, I don't know.

    12. Re:No need for hysteria by bigfrigginfrogman · · Score: 1

      I as understand it, Luke and Leia are Twins. But when they were split up Luke went off with Ben and Leia left with Portman. Which I guess means she doesn't die in part three.

    13. Re:No need for hysteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Obi-Wan had no knowledge of Princess Leia in The Empire Strikes Back. He said Luke is their last hope, and Yoda told him there was another.

    14. Re:No need for hysteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps she (Amidala) hands Luke over to Obi-wan fearing that Anakin may try to take the boy (to train him from birth) if he finds out he exists. Then Obi-wan sensing the force within Luke already yet trying to keep his identity concealed dumps Luke off on Uncle Owen, due to his slipping mind (EPIV to Luke in regards to R2D2- "I dont remember ever owning any droid..") and Amidala keeps Leia cause shes just a lil girl...

    15. Re:No need for hysteria by Joe+Mucchiello · · Score: 1

      You forget. Leia's name is Leia Organa. She ends believing Bail Organa's (Jimmy Smits) is a relation at some point. He of course gets blown up on Aldaraan in Episode IV. So Amidala doesn't stay on Tattoine. She joins the "rebellion" with Organa.

    16. Re:No need for hysteria by cpeterso · · Score: 0, Troll


      The main rumor is that Portman will film a "flashback" scene to be inserted into ROTJ when Luke asks Leia if she remembers her mother.

      Maybe the flashback will include Portman breastfeeding Leia?

    17. Re:No need for hysteria by Kethryvis · · Score: 1

      But Obi-Wan had no knowledge of Princess Leia in The Empire Strikes Back. He said Luke is their last hope, and Yoda told him there was another.


      Unless ObiWan didn't know Leia could do stuff with the Force. Remember, the Dark Side is clouding everything, mayhaps he didn't know Leia had the Force Powers too?

      Just a thought. I don't see how ObiWan could *not* have known there were two... at every turn he seems to be there. Maybe only Jedi who are still among the living can sense who can manipulate the Force and those who can't.

      Or maybe her powers were late in maturing?

      Just a few thoughts.

    18. Re:No need for hysteria by Hugonz · · Score: 1

      No, no, no....remember Leia's last name is Organa?? She goes to live with Senator Bail Organa and his wife, or something like that. I don't see Padme going with Sen. Organa!

    19. Re:No need for hysteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      hold on a second


      anakin did NOT know he had a daughter, so padme must have kept hidden the fact she had twins. Strange a jedi shouldn't have felt this.


      But leia is a senator of alderaan, so Padme must have entrusted leia to someone from that place. Do we know anyone from alderaan at this moment? guess not.

    20. Re:No need for hysteria by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1
      Are we sure they're twins? Its been a while since I watched ROTJ, but I think the "twins" status is from the books, with the movies just saying they're brother/sister. Something Lucas has no problems disavowing.

      Another explanation would be that Luke is spirited away to the Owens at birth, while Leia stays with Amidala for a few years before being turned over to the Organa's/Amidala is killed.

    21. Re:No need for hysteria by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 2

      Luke specifically asked Leia about her real mother, implying that she was adopted sometime after her birth and raised by another couple. Perhaps Padme will keep her for a while, then die somehow leaving Leia with Organa.

    22. Re:No need for hysteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, how about this:
      The books covering post RoTJ indicate that Luke's mother was a member of a clan/race which had a deeper understanding of a power, a side effect of which is the FORCE Jedi sense so...
      Amidala has to rejoin the clan for some reason, she leaves Leia with Bail and Wife, or maybe fakes her death, and then proceeds to romp around the empire leaving a trail of clues Luke follows decades later trying to find her; accompanied by a member of the same clan/race Amidala belonged to...

      Talk about continuity problems!!!

    23. Re:No need for hysteria by bozoman42 · · Score: 1

      No, cinematically I think it's better that she just wistfully thinks to herself. Adding more in there will clutter it too much. But then there's jump cuts and contrast errors all over EP2. Cinematically.

    24. Re:No need for hysteria by dev_sda · · Score: 0

      The only issue I see the with the varying qualities of the film.

      I greatly disliked the OBVIOUSLY digitally added materials in the remasters of IV-VI and it would just be that much more annoying to more.

      I think its a great idea if lucas can just match the video qualities up.

    25. Re:No need for hysteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facts:
      Luke and Leia are Twins.
      Ben knows all along about the two. Vader acknowledges it on E.VI.
      I'm almost certain Leia doesn't even know she's adopted. Otherwise she'd inquire about her parents as Luke did about his father.
      Which means Leia remembered her mother as being Bail Organa's wife.

      Speculation: Only reaches out to Luke, to help Leia, and gets killed before he reaches out to her too. Probably would have and trained both, had he survived the Death star escape, and the subseuqent battle of Yavin 4.
      If we take as fact that Leia remembers Bail Organa's wife as her mother, then either she remembers the wrong woman as her mother, or Padme ends up "married" to B.Organa and indeed Leia remembers her sad mother Padme - which would make sense in the old fasioned sense that Padme needed a legit father to her daughter, if she was to be kept safe from "bastard" accusations

      Conclusions:
      Lucas is a Dumb Pig that like Microsoft, releases a product that succseeds because there aren't enough alternatives, but as such, needs major bug fixes all the time. I wonder if David Lean would have remade Lawrence of Arabia to digitaly enhance Peter O'Toole performance into a flaming homo T.E. Lawrence, to fit the rumors.

    26. Re:No need for hysteria by Anenga · · Score: 1

      Just the books?

      Um, except Vader says "Ahhh... you have a Twin Sister!" in ROTJ

    27. Re:No need for hysteria by cicho · · Score: 1

      You mean, Jar Jar really is a pathetic Gollum ripoff?

      --
      "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
    28. Re:No need for hysteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Obi-Wan takes Luke and Amadala takes Leia and they hide them"

      And Obi-Wan cleverly gives Luke the last name "Skywalker" to hide his true identity.

    29. Re:No need for hysteria by dvNull · · Score: 1

      Obi Wan knew Leia was Luke's sister cause he said "Your insides serve you well" when Luke realised Leia was his sister.

      dvNuLL

    30. Re:No need for hysteria by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1

      Does he now? Told you its been a while. I dislike ROTJ ever more than The Phantom Menace. So I guess I'll stick with my second theory.

    31. Re:No need for hysteria by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      >Of course... since Jar-Jar is obviously a racial stereotype this may not go over so well...

      Or, of course, it may open up new markets for the franchise in the Deep South...

      Now I see Lucas' cunning plan!

      -Nano.

    32. Re:No need for hysteria by fferreres · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and Leia's birth is consealed while Luke's not. If Leia is not supposed to know she has a brother, she must not know her mother's Amadala. Because if she knew her mother was Amadala, then she can easily figure out she has a Brother somewhere (and maybe even know his name).

      I may be wrong, I'm not a religious SW fan (though i like IV, V, VI a lot).

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    33. Re:No need for hysteria by TGK · · Score: 2

      How about this. Lucas doesn't seem to give a rats ass about the man-decades of work that have gone into the Star Wars Universe....

      Chances are... we'll never see any of that.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    34. Re:No need for hysteria by nolesrule · · Score: 1

      He said, "Your insite serves you well."

      --
      -- nolesrule
    35. Re:No need for hysteria by nolesrule · · Score: 1

      spelling correction. Meant "insight".

      --
      -- nolesrule
    36. Re:No need for hysteria by Malicious · · Score: 1

      In Fact, Jar-jar, will be sold to the emperor, who will beliddle him, and torture him, until he grows weary, at which point he sells Jar-jar to Jabba the Hutt. Jabba, sends Jar-jar, for genetic testing, and we end up with a Rancor, which Jabba keeps below his palace. In ROTJ, we see Luke horribly slay the Rancor [jarjar] and the comicbook guy (the only one who loved Jar-jar) comes out in uniform, and openly weeps for Jar-jar. Everyone else rejoices. The End.

      --
      01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
    37. Re:No need for hysteria by dvNull · · Score: 1

      rofl ..

      ya meant to type that .. but hadnt had my coffee yet

    38. Re:No need for hysteria by Mezz · · Score: 1

      ok, fanboy mode coming on here...

      Luke asks her if she remembers her REAL mother in VI...

      I take this to mean that Leia knows about Amidala, but was raised by the Organas after Amidala's death.

  9. How dare he... by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...make changes to his own movie!

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
    1. Re:How dare he... by sphealey · · Score: 2
      How dare he make changes to his own movies?
      Once an artist releases a work, it becomes a much a property of the audience as of the artist. If he has the legal right to change it later (say, after it has become wildly popular?), and he does so, that is of course his business. But he shouldn't be surprised if the audience does not accept the revised work, nor if the audience villfies him for so doing.

      sPh

    2. Re:How dare he... by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 0

      Once an artist releases a work, it becomes a much a property of the audience as of the artist. If he has the legal right to change it later (say, after it has become wildly popular?), and he does so, that is of course his business. But he shouldn't be surprised if the audience does not accept the revised work, nor if the audience villfies him for so doing. Just look at Da Vinci's attempts at the hardcore-bondage-styled Mona Lisa 2.0... it was a hit with the younger crowd but the older folks didn't care much for it.

    3. Re:How dare he... by tfoss · · Score: 1
      Comic Book Guy: Last night's 'Itchy & Scratchy' was, without a doubt, the worst episode ever. Rest assured that I was on the Internet within minutes, registering my disgust throughout the world. As a loyal viewer, I feel they owe me.

      Bart: What? They've given you thousands of hours of entertainment for free. What could they possibly owe you? If anything, you owe them.

      Comic Book Guy: Worst episode ever.


      -Ted

      --
      -=-=- Quantum physics - the dreams stuff are made of.
    4. Re:How dare he... by EvlG · · Score: 2

      How does Star Wars become a property of the audience once it is released?? The rights are all with Lucas to do what he wants, the fans be damned.

      Of course, it makes sense for him to listen to the fans, but I don't buy this "it's mine!" crap. He made the movie. It's his movie. He can do what he wants.

      In the same way, we can do what we want by either liking it or rejecting it. But saying it is our property because we paid a few bucks to watch it? That is presumptuous.

    5. Re:How dare he... by sphealey · · Score: 2

      Well, that's the Paul Newman theory of celebrity, anyway.

      For those who aren't auto racing followers: Paul Newman is well-known in the auto racing world for verbally (and sometimes physically) abusing anyone who hints that they might have seen him somewhere off the racetrack. Of course, without those annoying things called "movies" and "fans", he wouldn't have the money to buy lots of shiny race cars, but I guess the Golden Rule applies.

      sPh

    6. Re:How dare he... by sphealey · · Score: 2
      Clearly, I did not mean "own" in the sense of "has legal title to under the laws of the United States of America", but "own" as in the sense of "has stewardship over". As in "the United States Government owns Yellowstone National Park". Can the USG use Yellowstone as a nuclear weapon testing ground? Yes, it can. Should it or will it? I believe, and hope, the answers are no and no.

      Same thing here.

      sPh

    7. Re:How dare he... by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      ...make changes to his own movie!


      It's not his movie anymore. It's a part of the culture. How do I know? Because every time a new one is released, we have all those annoying "Making of..." clips wherein people breathlessly assert that it's a fundament of the culture.


      You know what? Fame costs. Immanence costs. The price here is, Lucas no longer has sole claim to Star Wars. Legally of course he can do what he pleases... but he's still tinkering with a communal thing and had best be prepared for said community to revile him.


      Leave them alone, George. Episode I proved that you have no clue what made Star Wars special. Stop destroying our past.

    8. Re:How dare he... by EvlG · · Score: 2

      Right, we had the same understanding of the word own.

      But I still dont see how the viewers have "stewardship" over the film. We didn't create it. We just paid money to see someone else creation. And that someone else can do as they see fit.

    9. Re:How dare he... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is, people have been writing Star Wars books and other media for over 20 years now. And one of the hallmarks of writing Star Wars material is dealing with Lucas' ironfisted control over the storyline.... people have gone along with that for all this time just to keep their stories 'canon.'

      And now, after all this labor people have put into dealing with him.... and all the slack they've cut him... and all the influence they've let him have over their stories.... he comes along and changes it?

      Star Wars authors must be 'reeling like a man getting mugged in a meadow' to quote Hitchhikers.

  10. And (roughly) 50 years later... by goldspider · · Score: 1

    ...Padime (Natalie Portman) will still look exactly the same. Thank god (an Lucas, I guess) for artistic lisence!

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:And (roughly) 50 years later... by Saint+Nobody · · Score: 2

      there are several possibilities here:

      1. flashback. simple enough
      2. makeup. through the magic of makeup, they made winona ryder look old in the beginning of edward scissorhands, for instance. it works the other way too -- you can look younger. in addition to all the 30-something high school kids in aaron spelling dramas, they can still make dick clark look alive once a year for new year's eve.
      --
      #define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}
      F(#define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}%cF(%s))
    2. Re:And (roughly) 50 years later... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're way off. Episode I takes place 32 years before A New Hope; Episode II, 22 years; Episode III, 20. Adding 50 years would put you somewhere around the Corellian Trilogy or the Hand of Thrawn Duology.

    3. Re:And (roughly) 50 years later... by matrix29 · · Score: 2

      You're way off. Episode I takes place 32 years before A New Hope; Episode II, 22 years; Episode III, 20. Adding 50 years would put you somewhere around the Corellian Trilogy or the Hand of Thrawn Duology.

      Excuse me for going fanboy here, but this is in a "Galaxy far far away". Who says the completely identical to humans but not actually humans people age at the same rate we do. And if there is a technology level akin to our current level, there is no real reason to have them age at all. But that is another rant for another time in a non-George Lucas / meta-fucked retcon universe.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  11. And the craptification will be complete by Anomolous+Cow+Herd · · Score: 2
    I'll admit it, I really did enjoy the original Star Wars Trilogy.

    However, Lucas just didn't figure out that he should've quit while he was ahead. So we get bullshit like Episode I. What an utter disappointment. That was the last new Star Wars movie that I'll ever be tricked into seeing. What remains is only the manifestation of Lucas's desire to ride the wave of merchandising income driven by the sheer inertia of the franchise. The only people that I really see as enjoying the new breed of Star Wars movies are those who are in denial of its poor quality, those who refuse to believe that the best days of their favorite Sci-Fi adventure series is behind them.

    Sorry, folks. All good things must come to an end.

    --

    "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." - George Bush
    1. Re:And the craptification will be complete by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Lucas's desire to ride the wave of merchandising income driven by the sheer inertia of the franchise.

      Merchandizing like this?

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  12. Why? by crumbz · · Score: 2

    Why is he altering the originals? To screw with our collective mind? It's like removing words from the dictionary in 1984. He is a very bad man, IMHO.

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is a very bad man, IMHO.

      don't you mean double ungood?

    2. Re:Why? by cjpez · · Score: 5, Funny
      It's like removing words from the dictionary in 1984.

      lol. Right. It's imperative that we ensure our fiction is as absolutely accurate as possible. How will future generations know what might really have happened on Tatooine if it would have been a real place? Who can our children trust when they need to find out how the Rebel Alliance could possibly have destroyed the first Death Star assuming that either of those things existed in the first place.

      Please. Okay, yeah, Lucas may be a jerk for changing stuff around (if, indeed, he ends up doing so), but hell, don't liken it to 1984. It's just a movie.

    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He probably doesn't mean double ungood. He might mean plusungood or doubleplusungood.

    4. Re:Why? by Teutates · · Score: 1

      and we all know that 1984 was an accurate portrayal of the future.

      I tend to think Brazil is more accurate, but maybe i'm wrong.

    5. Re:Why? by rutabagaman · · Score: 1

      Yes we're talking about movies, but these are also film classics we're talking about here. If Kurt Vonnegut was going to rewrite Slaughterhouse 5 and resell it, I bet you wouldn't say "it's just a book"!

      I personally am fed up with directors and producers making superfluous and/or detrimental changes to great movies(Star Wars, The Exorcist, Apocalypse Now) and passing them off as somehow authentic. These re-releases don't even have the faintest whiff of artistic credibility; they're purely cash-ins. But hey, at least I have the options of seeing the original versions of these movies on DVD...except for Star Wars that is.

      Personally, I won't see AOTC or any George Lucas movie until either he releases the original non-special editions on DVD or he stops making movies.

      --
      (insert witty/esoteric/dumb quote here)
    6. Re:Why? by cjpez · · Score: 2

      If Kurt Vonnegut wants to rewrite Slaughterhouse Five, more power to him. Why not? It's his creation. I'm guessing there would also be a little "(revised)" or whatever after the title. Just like when Lucas spiffed up Star Wars the first time around, it was "Ultimate" or whatever he called it. If Lucas does it again, it'll be labeled that way. If you're fed up with directors and producers messing around with what you perceive to be classic, great movies, then just follow your own advice and don't see the new versions! Nobody's forcing you to go see a revised Episode 4, and I'm guessing if it ever gets made, nobody will be trying to pass it off as the authentic, original version.

  13. Whose movies are they? by oldstrat · · Score: 1

    They are George's movies and he can do with them what he wants.
    If he choses to destroy the 'image' in our eyes he can - he's the artist, not us.

    1. Re:Whose movies are they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      artist? Heh-heh. Even one the actors in S.W. Ep. 2 recognized that S.W. is not shakespeare. He said it's entertainment and I think he is right. I think ringmaster is more appropriate.

  14. Huh? by russx2 · · Score: 1

    I don't get it... why would Lucas insert new scenes into movies 30 years old. It seems a long way to go to cover his ass in terms of plot dependencies... I thought he had it all planned out anyway?!

    I can't see how this will help the story anyway, as a previous poster said, how is he going to release them anyway? On some vastly expensive DVD boxed set I'd imagine.

    Nah, my advice, leave the second part of the trilogy well alone... you've already mucked up the first!

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest plot hole I can find is that C3-PO is so lost at the same moisture farm in episode4 that he spent 10 years at between episode 1&2.
      I guess that could be fixed by having his memory erased in eposide3.(Though Uncle Owen should have his cleared too.)

      But things like Anakin's half-brother (owen) having a beard at nine years old are just unforgivable.
      It's clear that lucas has no real plan for the story, just introduce new characters to sell more action figures.

    2. Re:Huh? by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      No, really, you're an idiot.

      C3PO *does* have his memory wiped between Ep2 and Ep4.

      Owen is Aniken's STEP brother. By marriage. Aniken's mother is not his mother. Duh.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    3. Re:Huh? by russx2 · · Score: 1

      I didn't deny any of the above plot rumours. I merely implied that for Lucas to be 'adding' stuff to IV or v he must be trying to enforce some first-trilogy story. Or making a money spinner.

      Either way, it's not good!

  15. He should spend his time . . . by Ezubaric · · Score: 2

    fixing what's wrong with Episodes I & II. I'm sure there's more extra footage around, and it wouldn't be too hard to shore up the plot in those two installments. I would pay to see The Phantom Edit on the big screen, and I'm sure we could even completely replace Jake Droid with a more lifelike computer animation.

    Certainly the "oops . . . I just blew up a fleet" scene could be repaired.

    --

    ----------
    I am an expert in electricity. My father held the chair of applied electricity at the state prision.
    1. Re:He should spend his time . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He'll fix I & II with the all digital holomorphic IMAX++ release in 2020.

  16. Lucas' revisionist history by gripdamage · · Score: 0

    Lucas is saying he deliberately left blank areas on the screen for these characters since 25 years ago he didn't know who would be cast, but he knew exactly where he wanted to put them. Much like he's known the whole story of the 6 movies all along...

  17. Will the inserted Natalie Portman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    be naked and pertified ?
    If yes, then George Lucas is not evil but a Saint.
    If we are really lucky, he'll insert some hot grits, too.

    1. Re:Will the inserted Natalie Portman by Thud457 · · Score: 0

      Well, there was a (not naked) and petrified Han Solo in episodes V & VI !!!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  18. ha by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
    "Mind you this is reported as rumor, but it's so unsurprisingly possible... "

    That gives it away.

    Score:-1, Troll

  19. Sniff out leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like an attempt to find people within Lucasville who leak info to the media.

  20. Who cares anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean really StarWars was amazing in the 70's and got progressively worse. Then after a 20 year absence we get the pathetic Episode I. I have yet to waste my money on Episode II (my 10 year old sister could have come up with a better name than Attack of the Clones).

    This is sad really because technology was no longer a constraint. Unfortunately the StarWars series is now all fluff.

    1. Re:Who cares anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes like the empire strikes back is such a great name.

      Sorry but once you take off the rose colored glasses of nostalgia you'll see that episodes 4-6 are pretty much the same quality as 1 and 2. Only real difference is that you are now an adult.

      Oh yes chewbacca was such a great character...

  21. revised ep's IV thru VI? by EricBoyd · · Score: 1

    I didn't even know that Lucas was going to revise episodes four through six. Is he going to release them again, in *another* special remastering, with all new footage? Isn't that blatent cash cow behaviour anyway?

    If someone has any info on this, I'd be much oblidged if they posted the links below...

    Websurfing done right! StumbleUpon

    --
    augment your senses: http://sensebridge.net/
    1. Re:revised ep's IV thru VI? by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 2

      Maybe Lucas is taking a marketting note from P-Diddy et.al. and is going to just start releasing "re-mix" movies...

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
  22. I thought jar jar was toast by RealisticWeb.com · · Score: 1

    But the last rumor I had heard was that jar jar wasn't even supposed to be in episode 2. Remember all the controversy, "jar jar is a racial slang" stuff? I was surprized to see him in episode 2 because of all the public outcry from the first one. At least they gave him a small roll, and had him do an epicly stoopid thing. Maybe we will get to see his excecution in episode VI.

    --
    Sigs are out of style, so I'm not going to use one...oh wait..
  23. There's only one thing to say by Wind_Walker · · Score: 2
    YHBT. YHL. HAND.

    I wish that you people would at least *think* before you post online rumors like this one. Jar Jar in Episode 4? It takes place 30 years after Episode 3 ends, and the Gungans have a life span of only 25 years (from Episode 1). And where could Portman get worked into the plot of Jedi? There are no lines in the whole movie that reference a mother figure, only "I am your father". If anywhere, it would be in Empire, where Luke is talking to Obi Won, asking about his parents and finds out about his sister.

    1. Re:There's only one thing to say by ShmuelP · · Score: 1

      There's actually a very appropriate scene in Episode 6 (ROTJ)- remember at the very end when the ghosts appear smiling at Luke near the campfire? It wouldn't be *too* bad to put Portman there. The only problem is that, as far as we know, she's not a Jedi.

      According to the inside cover of Vector Prime, Episode 3 is only 20 years before Episode 4. The real problem with putting Jar-Jar, if he's supposed to have a maximum life-span of 25 years (assuming that that's not just an average for Gungans, and that spending time on Coruscant doesn't change things), is that he appears in Episode 1, which takes place 32 years before Episode 4

      --
      Solution to blink tags: wrap them in another blink tag, with a javascript delay loop, so they cancel each other out
    2. Re:There's only one thing to say by jdavidb · · Score: 2

      Luke finds out about his sister in Jedi, not Empire. (Although it is hinted at in Obi-Wan and Yoda's private conversation in Empire after Luke takes off from Dagobah.)

      The lines referring to the mother are in the conversation between Luke and Leia in Jedi. Lucas always said he added this scene in because he intended to make their mother a significant character in the prequels. I'm speculating added footage would involve a flashback on Leia's part.

    3. Re:There's only one thing to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think you need to take your own advice my friend. there is a lengthy scene involving a mother figure. on endor, while the rest of the cast is celebrating with the ewoks, luke and leia discuss memories (or lack there of) of said mother figure. again, think before you type.

    4. Re:There's only one thing to say by jmu1 · · Score: 2

      Not exactly correct. In Jedi, Luke asks Leia if she remembers her mother, to which she replies that she only remembers images, that she was very sad. If anything, they would slap some cheezy, editorially non-matching flashback to her childhood visions of her mother. Either way, it would be foolish to think that anyone but possibly Lucas's kids would get any entertainment from it.

    5. Re:There's only one thing to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are all fucking fruitcakes. Just ditch Star Wars, and wait for the next two Matrix movies to come out.

    6. Re:There's only one thing to say by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Sneak peek of the new footage dialogue :

      "[*boink*boink*boink*]

      Luke: Sis, why is mom having sex with an 8 year old ?

      Leia: Because he has a fast pod and a big lightsaber. And he reads /. every day."

      -cut to original movie-

      Luke: Ahhh.. so that's why you're wearing danish pastries.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    7. Re:There's only one thing to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...Gungans have a life span of only 25 years...


      Episode I will be simply altered to give the Gungans an acceptably long lifespan. The need for this will become apparent in Episode III, when Jar Jar suffers a Jedi mind wipe at the hands of Dooku and assumes the name "Chewbacca," which will open the way to re-edits of I-III to replace the ape with the floppy-eared amphibious Jamaican kangaroo. Similarly, Harrison Ford will lose his role to a digitally created likeness of George Lucas.

      (Jar Jar? Dooku? Jango? Is there some freakin' three year old coming up with these names?!)
  24. Special Special Edition by jimmcq · · Score: 2

    Personally, I liked most of the changes and enhancements of the "Special Editions" (except for Greedo shooting first).

    I thought it was great they Jabba was added to A New Hope, and I look forward to seeing Natalie Portman in Return of the Jedi, but pleeeeease no more Jar Jar.

    1. Re:Special Special Edition by Saint+Nobody · · Score: 2

      i don't care so much about greedo shooting first, when you compare it to that horrile jabba scene. i had almost managed to rationalize it away, thinking, "well he must have put on a few pounds between movies." after all, isn't it supposed to be several years in between episodes 4 and 6?

      then i saw episode 1 and realized that george lucas just didn't see how hideous that scene was because his colon was blocking his view.

      --
      #define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}
      F(#define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}%cF(%s))
    2. Re:Special Special Edition by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I thought it was great the way Jabba was added to A New Hope


      For story continuity reasons, maybe. But the way they physically did it was awfully clunky. They had shot a scene of Han walking around a big fat guy wearing a weird costume. Not "Jabba" enough I guess. So later when they CG add Jabba, the body sizes are off. So Han has to walk on Jabba's tail to walk around him. Bad, clunky. OK, this guy wants to kill me, let me walk on him, but then again the CG Jabba doesn't have a reaction at all anyway to this guy walking on him, so what the hell. Worse, they have to CG elevate Han, so all of a sudden, he just pops up maybe 2 feet, then pops down, no natural ovement at all. Very clunky.


      I also remember, maybe in a comic, that Luke and Leia kissed. Kinda icky since they're brother and sister. Just shows that Lucas never really thought the whole thing out, kinda shooting from the hip. That's not a bad thing, just don't confuse him with a story visionary.

    3. Re:Special Special Edition by thelexx · · Score: 2

      "I thought it was great they Jabba was added to A New Hope"

      Yeah and while they're at it, that Mona Lisa chick could sure use a makeover. Maybe straighten that damned tower too.

      The work was _finished_ and the art entered our minds and conciousness in that form, reinforced by over twenty years of repeated viewing by millions of people. To alter it now is tantamount to my exaggerations above. This just proves how out of touch with what he has created Lucas is. He really must see Star Wars simply as a rehash of the cheap serials from his youth, because he sure treats it that way. Screw him. Phantom Schlock was the last SW movie I will see in the theatre, and as I've stated before, though less brusquely, he can shove his revisionist DVD's up his ass.

      LEXX

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    4. Re:Special Special Edition by ShmuelP · · Score: 1

      According to (the inside cover of) Vector Prime, Return fo the Jedi is four years after A New Hope. Hutts do tend to become more obese as they get older, but I don't know if it happens quite do much in four years.

      --
      Solution to blink tags: wrap them in another blink tag, with a javascript delay loop, so they cancel each other out
    5. Re:Special Special Edition by Foochar · · Score: 2

      The kiss is in Empire, after Han saves Luke on Hoth. Han is being his normall boastful self and Leia decides to show him that he's not all that and plants one on Luke. Keep in mind that at this point they don't know that they are related. Luke leans back with a big grin on face, and Chewie chuckles in background. Han turns to Chewie and says "Laugh it up". That should be enough to bring the scene back to mind for most of the people here.

      --
      "You can't fight in here! This is the war room" --Dr. Stra
    6. Re:Special Special Edition by Thud457 · · Score: 1, Funny

      "The work was _finished_ and the art entered our minds and conciousness in that form, reinforced by over twenty years of repeated viewing by millions of people."


      Crap, next thing you know, you'll be arguing that copyright shouldn't be giving his great-great-great-great-great grandchildren a free ride! Are you an anti-American Terrorist? Is your name Fidel?!!!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    7. Re:Special Special Edition by Saint+Nobody · · Score: 2

      but, if you'll remember, jabba was watching the pod races in episode 1. and he was looking pretty damn fat. i somehow convinced myself to believe in the weight loss between "a new hope" and "return of the jedi", but i won't buy into the weight loss between "phantom menace" and "a new hope". granted 30 years is enough time to lose a lot of weight, but jabba doesn't exactly strike me as the kind of guy that would go for a run every day and eat healthy.

      --
      #define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}
      F(#define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}%cF(%s))
    8. Re:Special Special Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up you dipshit. Lucas can change the movie because he owns it. And honestly, you're comparing the original Star Wars to the Mona Lisa? You need some serious help with your values.

    9. Re:Special Special Edition by kpansky · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Yeah and while they're at it, that Mona Lisa chick could sure use a makeover.
      > Maybe straighten that damned tower too.

      Actually, the tower (Leaning Tower of Pisa, I assume) has been straightened out. since the tower was built on what is essentially a sand pocket, the tower has been leening further and further since its creation. Within the last few years many millions of dollars were spent to straighten and reinforce the tower to keep it from collapsing entirely. Just some background information.

      --

      --Kevin
    10. Re:Special Special Edition by ocbwilg · · Score: 2

      The kiss is in Empire, after Han saves Luke on Hoth.

      IIRC, there was also a quick kiss in Episode IV right before they swing across the chasm where there should have been a bridge on the Death Star.

    11. Re:Special Special Edition by thelexx · · Score: 2

      No I won't shut the fuck up you shit eating fucktard. OK, so I'm in a bad mood.

      Star Wars = Movie = Art
      Mona Lisa = Painting = Art
      Tower of Pisa = Architecture = Art

      It's all ART, different kinds and qualities, but art none the less.

      He doesn't own my memories or nostalgia, which are the prime motivator for me to re-watch or re-purchase his fucking movies in the first fucking place. DIPSHIT.

      Whatthefuckever.

      LEXX

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    12. Re:Special Special Edition by Number14 · · Score: 1

      Actually, there were two changes that need to be changed back in the special editions, and we can hope and pray that they will be by the time the DVD comes out.
      One is Greedo shooting first.
      The other is Luke's scream in Empire.

      In the original releases, Vader offers Luke corulership of the galaxy as father and son... and Luke looks him in the eye (well, faceplate), and lets go. And he falls, silently. Very zen, very focused.
      Now? He screams like a child as he falls. For all we know, he was about to say "Hey dad, I've thought about it, sure! Let's join up! Whoops! I slipped!!" Give us back one of the first signs of real backbone in Luke Skywalker.

    13. Re:Special Special Edition by jafac · · Score: 2

      There's also another kiss when she's patching up his stump in the Falcon after she rescues his whiny ass from the weather vane on the bottom of the cloud city. Very fast, almost glancing. I'm not sure what the whole point of it was.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  25. The obvious joke by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

    That being that Natalie Portman may be being inserted into Episode VI: Return of the Jedi

    If I where lucas, I'd do any kind of inserting with Portman that she'd let me.

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:The obvious joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why let a little thing like consent stop you?

  26. nooooooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy Shit! My life is no longer worth living! Entire belief system being torn from core...
    Aghhh!

    who fucking cares.

  27. I applaud his efforts by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 1, Interesting

    CGI and animation technology have come a long way since 1976, when Star Wars was first released. Sure, they are epic tales of love and death--but they need a little spice. I think it's a good idea to go back and touch them up in the slow spots. For instance, Chewbacka wasn't a necessary plot element and wasn't funny, either. Why not digitally replace him with the kid-pleasing Jar Jar?

  28. That *has* to be vicious rumour by Bob+Loblaw · · Score: 1

    George Lucas actually _listened_ to the fans and the complaints about EP1.

    Jar Jar featured far less promenently in EP2. I can only hope that he is keeping him around for EP3 to promenently feature his exploding death.

    He also did not feature any nameless boy bands in EP2 AFAICT. Not that he couldn't have snuck them in somewhere still ... I'll leave that search to the SW purists.

    Too bad he didn't listen to the other suggestions of getting someone else to write the dialog (like he did in TESB) ... peeee yeeew!

    1. Re:That *has* to be vicious rumour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was rather hoping they were the Tuscan Raiders :)

      If you've seen the movie you'll know what I mean.

    2. Re:That *has* to be vicious rumour by cicho · · Score: 1
      He also did not feature any nameless boy bands in EP2 AFAICT


      Instead - I can't believe nobody has commented on this yet - instead, he put advertisements, all neon-like, all over the cityscape. Ugh.

      --
      "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
    3. Re:That *has* to be vicious rumour by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Of course he put ads on the buildings. Star Wars isn't some quasi-communist society like Star Trek...

  29. Isn't this the exact same crowd... by stubear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...that wants to eliminate copyrights so ANYONE can make changes like this on a whim?

    Yeah, count my vote on that one.

    1. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by tashanna · · Score: 1

      You're confusing 'wanting to make changes' with 'having changes forced upon'. The big issue is Lucas changing the movie (again) and saying "No! Really! This is the right and only version! Those other ones don't exist! No you can't have them." I can't hop into the Lucas CVS repository and pull out a previous version.

      Tash

    2. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by cjpez · · Score: 2

      Urm, that's the thing about crowds of people, see? Each person in the crowd can have different opinions. Perhaps the people who care about this stuff just aren't the same people who care about copyrights. Blah, I've been trolled. Whatever.

    3. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • ...that wants to eliminate copyrights so ANYONE can make changes like this on a whim?

      No, this is the crowd that consistently supports fair use of copyrighted works. One explicitely allowed fair use is parody. To me, putting Jar Jar and Amidala into Episodes IV-VI is pretty much creating a parody, and so yes, anyone should be able to do this.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by ParticleGirl · · Score: 2

      You're confusing 'wanting to make changes' with 'having changes forced upon'.

      How is this possibly being forced upon you? You don't have to see it, you don't have to buy it-- you've probably already seen the original and if it's that holy you should already have your very own copy. Lucas never, to my knowledge, said "this is the right and only version" (though his commercial practices may seem that way, and he probably does think that way.) He, like most artists/songwriters, wants to release something he considers more finished. Artists and songwriters often release remixes, too. If you want some particular version of something-- either to mess with it or to keep it pristine-- you should take pains to get it.

      If you "want to make changes" you have to accept other people's rights (especially the original author/artist/etc!) to do the same!

      Yes, I have the original trilogy on vhs.

      --
      Do something about world hunger. Click here
    5. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by DrEldarion · · Score: 2

      and so yes, anyone should be able to do this.

      Including Lucas.

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    6. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but if copyrights were eliminated, all the geeks could just download the baselined version of sw_eIV.movie from the FSF mirror. That way they wouldn't get the newer updates (or just apply the patches they wanted).

    7. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by Sancho · · Score: 2

      The part about this that bugs /me/ is that I really want the originals on DVD. Not the version 3 releases with Natalie Portman footage, not the version 2 releases with the stupid Ewok song and Greedo shooting first, but the /originals/. With seemless branching available on DVDs, it should be possible to put all three versions on a single DVD without quality or feature loss. But my guess would be that Lucas only releases the version 3 series, which is why I personally am upset at this change.

    8. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Thats the whole point, dummy.

      If film goes to public domain, George can do whatever he likes to the thing, while I can still distribute the originals on whatever medium I like without his over-tinkering.

      It's about choice. Some of us like what hes doing, some dont. The way people talk sometimes, you'd think the idea of choice was some unneeded, valueless concept (or according to those who have a little power or property, downright dangerous.)

      George had his chance, did his thing, got rich, got paid, lived well, made lots of other movies, yadda yadda. Would it kill us to allow the population to pick their poison (in this case, the version of Star Wars) after 20 years .. you know, now that the IP creator has been compensated (and then some) for his work?

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    9. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by rreay · · Score: 1
      not the version 2 releases with the stupid Ewok song and Greedo shooting first
      Hell, lets even go back past the 1.1 release that added Episode IV A New Hope". That came with the 1980 re-release.

      I wish he'd stop tinkering with these films. It's not actually possible to get a copy of the version of the movie I saw initially.

      -rr
    10. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Forcing it upon you my ass. If the original pristien telling of Star Wars is so sacred to you (and if you're a true star wars fan) you would already own the original versions, the THX remastered versions, and the special editions. If you want it on DVD, you've already made a copy from your original VHS, cleaned it up some a burnt your own DVD. Lucas isn't forcing jack shit on you, you're buying it because you want to.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    11. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by abe+ferlman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's us.

      We're the ones who want anyone to be able to either make a derivative work, or to preserve the canonical one as necessary.

      --
      microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
    12. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by plastik55 · · Score: 2

      Yes. Also because without copyrights, I'd be able to get the original, unfucked-with version in a decent format.

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  30. quick! buy the originals now! by kraada · · Score: 1

    before all you can find are the "improved" version! Time to go fire up gnutella and start looking for A New Hope . . .

    1. Re:quick! buy the originals now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up you stupid fucking loser

  31. Jar Jar dies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be fine with Jar Jar in Episode IV if his appearance is for 3 seconds as a drunk in the bar on Tatooine who gets killed just as Luke & Co are walking in to look for a pilot.

  32. George goes down another notch by ejaytee · · Score: 1

    It was bad enough that he stopped making great movies. Now he wants to go back and make the great movies worse.

    At least it levels the playing field somewhat.

    Hold on to those only-slightly-enhanced VHS trilogy releases.

  33. Not necessarily bad... by Little+Dave · · Score: 1

    Provided its done right, and doesnt change the story, this might be a good thing. It will help to seamlessly blend the two trilogies without the glaring continuity problems that will inevitably crop up. A quick scene to explain why no one recognises the droids (maybe Owen Larrs confiding that he thinks they look familiar when he buys them, but dismissing it that when you've seen one R2 unit you've seen them all) or some shots of Jimmy Smits on Alderon just before this shit hits the fan might do wonders for interlinking two stories that were clearly not very well thought out to begin with.

    Of course, this is with the proviso that he offers the originals AS WAS and UNTOUCHED on the DVDs, and that the extra scenes are simply an optional extra.

  34. Classic Edition by bman08 · · Score: 1

    Can they just do a classic version so I can see Star Wars like it was when I saw it in the drive in movie theatre in 1977. My VHS copies are getting a little spotty from old age.

    1. Re:Classic Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you see why I bought them on Laerdisk - if the only DVD version is gonna be retconned - aw, fuck 'im.

    2. Re:Classic Edition by SWTP · · Score: 1

      Same here on LD. Got the unhacked box set. But the problem is Pioneer is killing of LD players shortly! :(

  35. Maybe he can fix some of the crap... by BagOBones · · Score: 1

    Man maybe he could UNDO some of the changes in the Special Editions. 1. REALLY REALLY BAD CG Jabba the hut.. the one in E1 looked much better 2. Grebo should not look like he is shooting Han, there is reson enough to off him with out making him look like a bad shot. 3. Change all the Ewoks into little Wookies? 4. Improve the aim of the storm troupers who seem to get REALLY dumb in Empire and Return What ever he does good or bad you know if it is a Star Wars movie it will make lots of money.

    --
    EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
  36. Makes me glad that I already bought the videos. by AltGrendel · · Score: 1

    They can't change em once you own them.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:Makes me glad that I already bought the videos. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you only bought a license to watch Lucas' property. In which case he could revoke those privledges and force only the viewing of his current vision of Star Wars.

  37. Han Solo won't stand for this! by bc90021 · · Score: 1

    I think that Han Solo will take one look at Jar Jar Binks and blow his head clean off with his laser pistol. Anyone else?

  38. i'm losing my mind by robburt · · Score: 1

    "Mind you this is reported as rumor, but it's so unsurprisingly possible... " This certainly is a give away, but I just got one of those ice-cream headaches when I saw this. Why does Lucas think that it's ok to distort the past. I guess he doesn't understand the meaning of a "Classic", I mean how can something be said to "stand the test of time", if we don't leave it alone?

    --
    --- I'll have a Bloody Mary, a Steak Sandwich and a uh Steak Sandwich.
    1. Re:i'm losing my mind by MrAl · · Score: 1

      Mabye Lucas doesn't consider these movies as "Classics"? Maybe he thinks they're just movies that people like but he could never do what he really wanted to do when he made them so now he'll make the changes? Or maybe he thought of something later that would have been cool and now he gets a chance to do it? I think as far as Lucas is concerned (and me as well) they're just movies. Enjoyable, exciting movies. Something to watch while kicking back on the couch with some popcorn. But they're nothing more, nothing less. Maybe Lucas doesn't see the changes as a great sin because he's not turned Star Wars into a freakin' religion...

  39. Bar Scene by falser · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I'd be happy with this news if they decide to replace the alien that was bullying Luke with Jar Jar, and instead of Obiwan cutting off his arm he decides to rid the Star Wars universe of him once and for all:

    JJ: "Meesa wanted man in 12 systems!!!"

    Luke: "I'll be careful"

    JJ: "Yousa be dead like a da Gungans!!!"

    (swoosh! - lops off his head)

    1. Re:Bar Scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, we have the script for the 10 second scene. Now all we need is someone with the equipment to make this...

      -cmh

    2. Re:Bar Scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jar Jar is a gungan. So like yousa make no sensa.

    3. Re:Bar Scene by Tom+Finch · · Score: 0

      What's with the decimal? Only stupid people use decimal. Are you stupid? Reformat in hexadecimal and repost.

    4. Re:Bar Scene by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      s/12/C
      happy now?

  40. It's funny cause it's true by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're like abused wives. You keep coming back for more, even though it hurts.

    The parent will probably end up at -1 flamebait pretty soon, but it's actually an appropriate sentiment.

    If you don't like what Lucas has done or is going to do (Episode 7 anyone?), just give your money to someone else. Break the cycle. His ego is such that he doesn't care if people hate Jar Jar or any of his other silly CGI insertions. AotC will make him millions and episode 3 will make him millions more, regardless. Just let it be and go focus in on other movies and moviemakers. They'll appreciate your 10$ more than Lucas ever will, I'm sure.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

    1. Re:It's funny cause it's true by happyclam · · Score: 2
      If you don't like what Lucas has done or is going to do (Episode 7 anyone?), just give your money to someone else. Break the cycle.

      Yes! Join the cultural revolution NOW!

      --
      He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    2. Re:It's funny cause it's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is time we break the damn cycle. And as my first step I bought me a Star Wars sucks T-shirt. I'm noy going to take the abuse anymore dammit!

    3. Re:It's funny cause it's true by 2names · · Score: 1

      Be careful, don't let the pendulum swing too far. Remember back at what we thought was the "end" of disco? Everyone was burning disco records, "Death before Disco" shirts were everywhere, etc. And what happened? Disco came SCREAMING back into popularity later. We can't let this happen again!

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    4. Re:It's funny cause it's true by AshleyB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since when did it become 'ego' for a person to make a film the way he wants to make it?

      But just so I understand, if the MPAA threatens an 'NC-17' rating for a film, that is covert censorship resulting in a movie being changed from the director's vision...but because YOU don't like something the director should cave in to whatever you want??

      You know, it WAS a bummer that the Titanic sank and all those people died...kinda killed the romance; how about a re-write Mr. Cameron?

    5. Re:It's funny cause it's true by pivo · · Score: 2, Funny

      But there was an upside to disco, specificially the associated lasciviousness. There is no upside to Star Wars.

    6. Re:It's funny cause it's true by Darby · · Score: 1

      And what happened? Disco came SCREAMING back into popularity later.

      I think you mean a few losers tried to bring it back and it quickly died again. In England though...uggh. I was there back in September and I learned that it never got unpopular. Now no offense to you Brits, I had a great time and most things about the culture and people were pretty cool. Heck, I'm even living with one of you ;-)
      But how could you be that freaking dumb about anything.

    7. Re:It's funny cause it's true by heybrakywacky · · Score: 1

      If you don't like what Lucas has done or is going to do (Episode 7 anyone?), just give your money to someone else.

      I already made that decision after Episode I, or I should say after Episode I and hearing Mr. Lucas spout off something about DVD not being the right medium for releasing the previous Star Wars movies. Yeah, the VHS format you've already released them on is far superior. Oh, and what a surprise, the new garbage movies are on DVD.

      Everything I've seen about George Lucas points to him being an arrogant, self-important asshole. I never wanted to think so, since I loved the first two Star Wars installments. But evidence is evidence. I remember when my sister bought the re-release VHS tapes of the Star Wars Trilogy, and you were subjected to this monstrously long interview with George Lucas at the beginning of each tape. So you had no choice but to watch it or fast-forward through it to get to the movie. If that isn't the most blatant example of his arrogance, I'm sure the example that is deserves the award.

      So when he dished up the turd that is Episode I and expected me to eat it and enjoy it like a good little Star Wars drone, I said I'd be damned if I was going to give him anymore money. No Episode II for me; not in the theaters, not on video, not on TV, no chance. No Episode III. No Episode Anything. That cheeseball is going to have to find some other schmuck to feed him and stroke his super-ego. The sad part is, I'm sure that he will.

      --
      I'm sorry sandwich! --Brak
    8. Re:It's funny cause it's true by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 1

      I think you missed my point.

      It's irrelevent what the audience wants in this case -- Lucas is going to do what Lucas is going to do. It IS the mark of a strong ego that he won't bend to his audience, but that is neither a good nor a bad thing.

      What it does mean is, if you don't like what he's been doing, don't fork over the money to see it. Then you're not putting yourself at financial loss for an unfulfilling experience, and you're giving yourself nothing to complain about.

      --

      --------
      Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

    9. Re:It's funny cause it's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there was a disco verison of the Star Wars theme.

    10. Re:It's funny cause it's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I learned my lesson after Episode 1

  41. Ambivalence... by ndogg · · Score: 1

    I'm ambivalent about this move. Natalie Portman==good. Jar Jar Binks==bad. If he stopped at Natalie Portman, I would have said he's a saint, but Jar Jar Binks! I'm not so sure...

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  42. Natalie Portman May Be Completely Hot by UVABlows · · Score: 1

    But she isn't (contrary to popular belief) and George Lucas isn't going to do this. Move along people.

    --

    <high-level position here>
    <name of stupid small company here>

    1. Re:Natalie Portman May Be Completely Hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      New rule on /., anyone using the cliche` "Move along people" will be beaten to death with their keyboard.

    2. Re:Natalie Portman May Be Completely Hot by mcwetboy · · Score: 1

      New rule on /., anyone using the cliche` "Move along people" will be beaten to death with their keyboard.

      (waves hand) No one will be beaten to death with their keyboard.

      (pause) No one will be beaten to death with their keyboard.

      They can use whatever clichés they like.

      They can use whatever clichés they like.

      Move along.

      Move along.

    3. Re:Natalie Portman May Be Completely Hot by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      At least I am not alone in thinking that N.P. is nothing to write home about.

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    4. Re:Natalie Portman May Be Completely Hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you may be gay.

  43. plot as a function of time by ln(Omega) · · Score: 1

    This could raise interesting questions for the time-evolution of myths/stories/cultural commonalities. Usually a movie like Star Wars would have a limited lifetime until people got bored of it, and succeeding generations either would or would not pick it up again as being applicable to their life and time (see the Spiderman vs. Star Wars post from a few days ago). But if movies are altered not just to spice up the special effects but to actually alter the plot, there's potential for significant change in plot or even theme. Then "Star Wars" is no longer one movie, or three movies, or six movies plus digital enhancements of the first three. Suddenly it becomes a whole spectrum of stories, with the state of the Star Wars saga in, say, 2006 being potentially totally different from the state of the Star Wars saga in 1995 or even 2002. Comparison of the individual movies with their potentially-to-be-released enhancements could be interesting from the standpoint of what this says about our culture's evolution.

    1. Re:plot as a function of time by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      It would make movies the equivalent of dish rags, just wring them out and reuse them over and over. Why not adjust the the Mona Lisa? Her clothes are out of style, maybe a belly shirt?

      Instead of offering creativity and new ideas we keep getting more and more rehashes. Going back to the same source and beating it to death isn't art or even entertainment, it is like a never ending SNL skit that refuses to die.

      Maybe they'll update movies every few years so they can update the product placements and keep those ad bucks flowing.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:plot as a function of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, Katz, that alias isn't fooling anyone you know...

  44. hey kids by Jacer · · Score: 1

    i think that the episodes 4 5 and 6 should be redone, with someone other than two coke addicts in the lead roles (mark hammil and carrie fischer) and put in some more of the newly choreographed fight scenes which are ow so tastey none of that shit between luke and vader, as lucas called the fight, between an untrained boy and a cripple! haha

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    1. Re:hey kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea. Excellent. I'm sure everyone agrees.

      lops off jacer's head with a lightsaber

  45. Meesa thinks by teslatug · · Score: 2

    I might skip watching the SW's movies...they've gotten "lazy" in the creativity department anyway.

    1. Re:Meesa thinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You blow, that other guy blows, and so does that guy up there.

  46. May not be that bad. by Papa+Legba · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First I want to say that any lengthy insert would be a disaster. I think their is no argument at all on that subject.

    I can , however, see where a small insert would be helpfull to the story line. Something like a shot of jar jar watching luke meet obiwan and saying "the circle starts again" or something similar IANASW( I am not a script writer). A small item to help tie the first three with the next three. With the way that these movies were filmed, in reverse order, Something like this may be necesary to make them feel as a whole series again.

    The other possibility is that he needs to add elements to tie the last three to the middle three. For an example having queen amadala show in return to say that she was never gone but hiding out and once the emporer is defeated we need to go do this. He may have excluded these parts in the original filming becuase it would have created a cliff hanger in the movie that would not be resolved for 30 to 40 years. Now he can add it and start the work, striving for a completed nine movies over three sets of three.

    The point is a little dash of extra may not be so bad, have to see it to judge. Let's just hope this is not done as some marketting stunt to get us all buy the movies AGAIN.

    --
    Papa Legba come and open the gate
    1. Re:May not be that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The films were not made in reverse order.

      Lucas got lucky with the original Star Wars, and after a few false-start sequels (i.e. the dismal Christmas Special) he figured he was onto something. It's likely the whole idea for a six-film series came out of bong hits with Joseph Campbell in about 1982 or so.

      It's alright, Beethoven's Ninth Symphony was heavily rewritten by Rimsky-Khorsikov the same way. I am just hoping that people wouldn't allow the re-write to totally obscure the original, the way it has happened for Beethoven's Ninth.

    2. Re:May not be that bad. by doorbot.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He may have excluded these parts in the original filming becuase it would have created a cliff hanger in the movie that would not be resolved for 30 to 40 years. Now he can add it and start the work, striving for a completed nine movies over three sets of three.

      My understanding was that the trilogies were supposed to be separate. Yes, there is a background story which flows between the nine, but each trilogy is (I guess) about a different generation. But hasn't Lucas said he wasn't going to make the third trilogy.

      Which brings me to my argument. I have yet to see any convincing evidence that there ever was a trilogy of trilogies. It seems to me that Lucas is just winging it, knowing Star Wars fanatics will blindly follow where their messiah takes them (call it fundamentalism if you want). He may have had the original trilogy in mind when he made the Ep IV (debatable) but I find it extremely hard to believe he had the entire series of nine in mind. Now, however, he's in a position to claim he had the whole thing in mind the whole time, and who is really going to question him? SW zealots take his word as Truth, and nobody else really cares.

      I'm actually planning on seeing AOTC tonight, so we'll see if Lucas manages to impress. I have the advantage of having no hopes that it will... so perhaps this movie will be rated on its own merit and not the merit of the supposed "universe" which "Lucas created." Newsflash: Lucas didn't do a hell of a lot... writers like Timothy Zahn did the great work extending the SW universe. Lucas just gets the credit.

      I'm a former SW fan (fanatic, perhaps, but only a bit beyond the "fan" level). Maybe that makes me a bit disgruntled and angry of how Lucas has fleshed out the plot to "his" movies -- that's fine if they're his movies, but you'd think he'd have the self-interest to make sure the new ones didn't suck. Episode I was just another example of Lucas's complete lack of talent.

      As Han says, "I call it luck."
      To which Obi-Wan answers, "In my experience, there's no such thing as luck."

      Well... who do you like more? I always liked Han.

    3. Re:May not be that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Something like a shot of jar jar watching luke meet obiwan and saying "the circle starts again" or something similar IANASW( I am not a script writer).

      And, if Jar Jar just happens to be holding a Pepsi, would that be such a bad thing? We'll just have to wait and see. Just hope this isn't done as some sort of marketing stunt or anything.

    4. Re:May not be that bad. by djp928 · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded up to 5? These are the most retarded suggestions I've ever seen. Yeah, what a great idea, let's insert 20-something Natalie Portman into the end of Jedi and have her talk to her 20-something son and daughter and lead them on another fun adventure for three more movies.

      And I'm not even going to touch that Jar-Jar comment. Yeesh.

      Do any of you actually read the stuff you mod?

    5. Re:May not be that bad. by Dirtside · · Score: 2
      As Han says, "I call it luck."
      To which Obi-Wan answers, "In my experience, there's no such thing as luck."
      Since Episode I came out, I've thought that was a funny line, considering how lucky Obi-Wan was in his fight against Darth Maul, who should have rightly killed him. :)
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    6. Re:May not be that bad. by skeller · · Score: 1
      I can , however, see where a small insert would be helpfull to the story line. Something like a shot of jar jar watching luke meet obiwan and saying "the circle starts again" or something similar IANASW( I am not a script writer). A small item to help tie the first three with the next three. With the way that these movies were filmed, in reverse order, Something like this may be necesary to make them feel as a whole series again

      I don't know who's worse -- the original poster or the morons who modded this shit up to 5, Insightful. That has to be one of the worst fucking ideas I've ever heard. Yeah, that's what I want, Jar-Jar spouting words of wisdom. That computer generated freak doesn't deserve to share the screen (even as an insert) with Sir Alec Guinness.

      Maybe, after we reveal that Amidala was "hiding," we could reveal that neither Anakin nor Yoda nor Obi-Wan actually died (I know! They were just resting!) and they can all do a chorus line with Ewoks! Then Jar-Jar can come out and sing "The Circle of Life" from The Lion King. That would be awesome.

      Seriously, remember how much Lucas screwed up the first trilogy the last time he messed with them? If you don't, here's a clue: Greedo shooting first. I just pray that someday I'll get the original, unaltered, trilogy on DVD. Probably not until Lucas is dead, but I can wait...

    7. Re:May not be that bad. by zericm · · Score: 1

      IANASW( I am not a script writer)

      Based on Episode 1 and 2, neither is George Lucas.

      --
      The welfare of the people has always been the alibi of tyrants. - Albert Camus
    8. Re:May not be that bad. by lunchlady+doris · · Score: 1

      You're actually more right than you know. I remember reading a couple years ago that George denied that there ever was a third trilogy planned. From what I understand--which might not be that much--the existence of a third trilogy was basically an urban legend.

      Since the Star Wars saga revolves around Anakin, the fact that he dies in RotJ (shit, did I just give away that Anakin is Vader) should add weight to the theory that there was never meant to be more.

    9. Re:May not be that bad. by Makaer · · Score: 1


      It seems like it would be easier, and better, to simply have the end of III end in such a way that it gracefully leads into IV.

      I don't think it's necessary, I think each movie, in each trilogy should in some way stand alone.

      I also thought Jaba in the re-edit of IV was lame though. It just felt forced. It would be very difficult to splice in new footage in a way that didn't make the difference in filming techniques and animation a striking contrast.

      I'm in the camp who says 'Lucas is a big sell out' and I selectively purchase/view his 'work'. I won't spend money to see the old movies with 5 seconds force fed scenes. But you can, and that's why Lucas keeps doing it.

    10. Re:May not be that bad. by plaa · · Score: 2

      Maybe that makes me a bit disgruntled and angry of how Lucas has fleshed out the plot to "his" movies -- that's fine if they're his movies, but you'd think he'd have the self-interest to make sure the new ones didn't suck. Episode I was just another example of Lucas's complete lack of talent.

      I've got a conspiracy theory on that one: Lucas of course deliberately made Ep.I suck so that at least the other two would look good in comparison! =)

      On another point, I believe that the general attitude against Jar Jar among the fandom has had an effect on how little Jar Jar was shown in Ep.II. And even when Jar Jar is in the picture, he's a completely new animal - not the same half-witted idiot he was in Ep.I. Along those lines, I don't think Lucas will make any very stupid changes to Eps. IV-VI.

      --

      I doubt, therefore I may be.
    11. Re:May not be that bad. by nordaim · · Score: 1

      The only problem with this is that Lucas has never committed to making 9 films. This myth arrives from interviews with him back in the day when he was asked if he would do anything with the trilogy and if he would make more films. At that time he saw 3 prequels and maybe one final film that tied in what happened with the characters from the original films (Han, Luke, Chewie, et cetera) after the fall of the empire.

      --
      -- You don't shoot to kill, you shoot to stay alive.
    12. Re:May not be that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, thanks to disney, it's 70 years after he dies

    13. Re:May not be that bad. by SuuSt · · Score: 2

      Only a star wars fan would say to themselves:

      "This movie is going to suck, I know it's going to suck. I will not enjoy this movie. Huh? Oh yes, here is my $7 to see a movie that I know for a fact will suck."

    14. Re:May not be that bad. by beleg777 · · Score: 1

      Well... who do you like more? I always liked Han.

      I always like Obi-Wan better. But that doesn't mean that Star Wars was as good as it was because of Lucas. I don't think it was luck, but I do think it was a lot of factors that were not under his control.

      --

      Science may someday discover what faith has always known.
    15. Re:May not be that bad. by mobydobius · · Score: 2

      For an example having queen amadala show in return to say that she was never gone but hiding out and once the emporer is defeated we need to go do this.

      Isn't it obvious to all that Amadala will die in the third movie; that her death will be what finally completes Anakin's turn to the Dark Side.

      Anakin finds mother who he loved dead. Kills a village in rage. Anakin falls in love and marries. Anakin loses wife....

      --

      "I like to wear big boy pants."
    16. Re:May not be that bad. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "Isn't it obvious to all that Amadala will die in the third movie; that her death will be what finally completes Anakin's turn to the Dark Side. "

      Not really, no. It's a bit of a complicated situation because somehow Amidala is going to give birth to Princess Leia without Anakin ever knowing. It stands to reason that if Amaidala is alive after being with Anakin, but he's not aware of it, that somebody (the Jedi?) helped hide Amidala from him. The only reason I can see for them doing that is if it is pretty damn obvious he's evil. In other words, his trip to the dark side is complete before Amidala is hidden from him.

      If Lucas is smart, Anakin's journey to the dark side will be something more interesting than Count Dookie coming up with some silly plot to piss him off.

      There was a couple of hints in Episode II, though, that suggests that Anakin may be on his way to becoming Vader without external help. He mentioned a point of view on government that loosely reminded me of what the Empire is in the later trilogy. Personally, I think what'll happen is that the Clone War will help him realize that chaos is destroying the universe, so he'll take steps to restore order. Then the Emperor comes by and says "join the dark side, and you have the power to rule the universe fairly..."

      I can even see it happening that the Jedi attempt to stop Anakin, only to severely injure him and require the use of his suit. That alone could be the cause of Vader's personal feelings against the Rebellion...

      Well that's all speculation. Lucas has the opportunity to really make a kick ass story with Episode 3, but I fear what he'll do is write a basic plot and balance it with CG filler. I wish that the guy who wrote Empire Strikes Back would write Episode 3. Could turn out pretty good...

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    17. Re:May not be that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, if you replaced "Lucas" with "Linus" and "Star Wars" with "Linux" it would still make sense.

    18. Re:May not be that bad. by FatBobSmith · · Score: 1

      Where does the Star Wars Holiday Special play into that? Oh, and the Muppet Show and Sesame Street appearances, not to mention the two cartoon series (Ewoks and Droids)? Maybe Lucas could just combine the footage from all those sources and give Star Wars one good last kick in the groin before he dies.

    19. Re:May not be that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know who's worse -- the original poster or the morons who modded this shit up to 5, Insightful. That has to be one of the worst fucking ideas I've ever heard.

      Abso-fucking-lutely. Can you imagine Jar Jar digitally inserted into a conversation with some Alec Guinness off-cuts from the original SW? It'd be litle Lucas taking a big fat shit Guinness's grave.

    20. Re:May not be that bad. by Salsaman · · Score: 2
      Not true. I have a set of old Star Wars comics from 1977-1982, and they definately mention *9* films at some point in the letters pages.

      I can't give you an exact reference right now, since the comics are stashed away somewhere. The letters are quite interesting, there is also the first mention of 'Empire Strikes Back', the suggestion for the title actually came from a fan.

      I'll have to read through them again at some point.

    21. Re:May not be that bad. by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I lost any respect for Alec Guinness when he bad-mouthed that fan for having no life, and his attitude towards Star Wars generally.

      graspee

    22. Re:May not be that bad. by rbird · · Score: 2, Informative
      I wish that the guy who wrote Empire Strikes Back would write Episode 3. Could turn out pretty good...

      Unfortunately, she's dead. :( Leigh Brackett only received co-screenwriter credit, but it is well known that Lucas and Kasdan only made a few revisions to her work.

      Bob

  47. Signature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will pray for your soul and hope that you'll repent in time. I have seen the future of the USA and it is One Nation Under God where antichristians will not be tolerated.

  48. Looks like we're screwed for the DVDs by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 2

    Since Lucas claims to be waiting for the current trilogy to be complete before releasing IV, V, and VI on DVD, it looks like we'll end up being stuck with the latest and greatest bastardization of the originals. Time to invest in a laser disc player.

    Maybe there will be a hidden feature that will let you play the movie in the original, uncut version.

    --
    "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    1. Re:Looks like we're screwed for the DVDs by Cirrocco · · Score: 1

      He could release them in original and SE flavors, y'know, make it a menu option.

      And if you simply MUST have the original version, check out your local used-record outlet. There are plenty of copies of the old CBS Home Video version of ANH on VHS.

    2. Re:Looks like we're screwed for the DVDs by Ricdude · · Score: 2

      Hmm. I have the original releases on VHS, and the special edition releases. Anyone who can send me a TV-in card that works under Linux, and the UPC codes from the VHS tapes, I'll gladly digitize a copy for. =) VCD/SVCD format, unless you want to send me a DVD burner, too. =)

      Now, if I could just get a reliable site for phantom edit part 2...

      --
      How's my programming? Call 1-800-DEV-NULL
    3. Re:Looks like we're screwed for the DVDs by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2

      I'd like to see GL try to "insert" Natalie Portman into my own laserdisc copies. If he comes anywhere near them, he's gonna get a bowl of hot grits down his pants.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    4. Re:Looks like we're screwed for the DVDs by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      Actually, the LD version is not uncut. It's missing two scenes from the original movie, as are all home-view productions. There is a scene where Luke is talking to a pilot (argh, forget his name -- Biggs?) lamenting about Han, after han took his cash and left as the death star was closing. I can't remember the other missing scene. :(

    5. Re:Looks like we're screwed for the DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe some fart smeller, er, smart feller, can cut and paste 'ANH: the original' and put back the Han Solo scene as it was meant with the new DVD release, and put on the net in SVCD (dvd-lite) - I could put up with a brief change in color saturation/lighting, etc.

      Maybe we can make our own hybrids...

      shait (shit in Irish), by then, mayhab posting a dvd image won't be so bad, or even a variant of mpeg4, assuming lots of dvd players come with support by then...

    6. Re:Looks like we're screwed for the DVDs by SWTP · · Score: 1

      Hum. Will need to check my untainted version { non ANH } copy if I can get the old Beta fired up.

      There is the early shots of luke watching the princess ship being attached going into Tash station to tell his friends and meeing Brigs.

      This from the amount of still I would guess it was shot but never included. It fitted in the script between where the droids are in the escape pod and Liea captured walking down the hall to met vader.

      I dont remember Brig's full talk later to luke and the rebel officer was put in the orginal. I think ther was a short talk of him saying about happy to see each other and then boarding the xwings.

    7. Re:Looks like we're screwed for the DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know; why don't you go out and get a fucking job so you can buy all that shit yourself and geek out to your heart's content.

  49. Tragic by Washizu · · Score: 4, Funny

    How dare he ruin the series by making changes to it after it was released.

    Ooh a new halflife patch!

    --
    OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
    1. Re:Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where the hell did you find a Half-Life patch in that story? I'm in desperate need of a Quake III patch and perhaps they put it nearby.

    2. Re:Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you fucking suck.

    3. Re:Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your mum.

  50. progress... by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 0

    the more lucas goes on the more he defiles star wars... i'm hanging onto my vhs copies of the original-originals... when will the insanity end?

  51. Darth JarJar by cybrpnk2 · · Score: 2

    If they're doing all of this revision, I hope JarJar officially goes over to the Dark side and becomes kind of a mini-me to Vader. Call him Darth JarJar. In Episode IV - Death Star Officer to Vader - "(insert new footage of JarJar)The two of you...are the last of the Jedi Order...later, ObiWan can fight BOTH a digitally inserted JarJar and Darth at the same time in a two-on-one fight like in Ep 1. Etc, Etc, the possibilities are endless...

  52. HAHAHAH The arrogance by Augusto · · Score: 2

    But he shouldn't be surprised if the audience does not accept the revised work

    Oh yeah, how much do you want to bet that these DVDs with new footage will sell like hotcackes ?

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
  53. What Lucas Doesn't Mention... by DeLabarre · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...is that R2D2 and C3PO's memories are accidentally wiped during a bungled attempt to upgrade their firmware in Flash ROM...

    --

    In the Star Trek evil Mirror Universe, virtuoso cellist Yo-Yo Ma is gangsta hiphop star DJ Yo Ma-Ma.

    1. Re:What Lucas Doesn't Mention... by d_lesage · · Score: 1

      ... or they were trying to play a pirated copy of Celine Dion's copy-protected CD, and it wiped their CD-ROM's firmware.

      --

      Ich werde nie wieder denken
    2. Re:What Lucas Doesn't Mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He doesn't mention why Obi-Wan McGregor doesn't rememeber the droids. Maybe his memory gets erased also.

  54. George Lucas said in an Interview by Krach42 · · Score: 1

    In an interview with Maxim, George Lucas said that if he rereleased the old Star Wars trilogy, that it would be just to get it to a new generation. (Meaning: no new footage.)

    --

    I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    1. Re:George Lucas said in an Interview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows does have a GCC port, moron. Do a search on Google for CYGWIN

  55. Also in Episode III... by ilyag · · Score: 1

    I imagine, Naboo will be renamed to Alderaan. Also, just to piss everyone off, Darth Vader will kill Anaken and Darth Sidous will kill Palpatine. Episodes 4-6 are waiting to be remade...

    ;)

  56. Bootleg Episode 3 by DanMcS · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, I hear that if you cross the International Date Line thrice, backwards, at the equator, and then find the proper site in Taiwan, you can get a copy of Episode 3 before Lucas has a chance to mess it up...

    --
    Communication is only possible between equals
    1. Re:Bootleg Episode 3 by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny

      A glassy-winged sharpshooter, which said it would be my friend, told me Lucas really does plan to do an Episode VII, he just tried to fool us all by saying he had no plans to, until he got I - III out of the way. Turns out Jar Jar is Palpatine's love child and is what drove him to the dark side in the first place. Jar Jar returns in Episode VII as Darth Woogums, takes the remnants of the imperial fleet, sets up shoppe on the planet Potrzebie and bides his time until he can again establish control over the reformed senate. The sharpshooter would have told me more, but Santa Clara County Pest Control seemed keen on erradicating the species and nuked it. There was a curious dark van with them, though, with a license plate reading ILUVJJ and a Lucas Valley Ford frame...

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Bootleg Episode 3 by shut_up_man · · Score: 1

      All you need is the advanced EEG imaging system along with Apple's new QuickTime 6.0 beta with Brain2Vid technology!

      from Copies of Spider-Man 2 Already on the Web

    3. Re:Bootleg Episode 3 by uslinux.net · · Score: 2

      Maybe. There was an article on how people are already bootlegging Spider-Man 2, so if you believe that, perhaps you're in luck :-)

  57. Finally saw SW:EII Sunday by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    While I was lead to believe that Jar Jar would pretty much shut up in Episode II, he talked and babbled a bit more than I cared for, but the rest of the film made up for it. (Note: Reviewers who didn't like it should avoid reviewing any other Lucas films)

    Inserting Amidala/Padmé into the other films wouldn't do anything but confuse fans, offering nothing in the way of the story. Same goes for Jar Jar, only adding suffering to fans.

    I do hope, after E III they run IV thru VI in theaters again. Preferably in the summer after E III comes out, it would be cool to watch I (even w/Jar (ugh) Jar) and II at home then III through VI at the theater. I'd be there. 8^)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  58. The most insightfull Slashdot post yet! by VividU · · Score: 1

    Good Job!

  59. an analogy by paradesign · · Score: 1

    lucas is to film as gates is to software.
    excessively meddling and tainting
    JJB reminds me of that stupid fucking paperclip in word. they both need to be shot. i cannot wait to see the assanation of JJB in the senate in ep3.

    --
    I want 2D games back.
  60. This raises the question by Microsift · · Score: 1

    Can Return of the Jedi be any worse? There was some cool stuff in the movie, but of the four Star Wars films I've seen Episode VI comes in at a distant third behind IV, which lost to Episode V by a nose. I haven't seen episode II yet, sacrelige I know...

    Filmmakers need to stop screwing around with their films. It's one thing to add scenes that were deleted, but the changes made to Episode IV, and E.T are unforgiveable. I for one was satisfied with the world where Han Solo shots first, and Elliot's mom thought his costume made him look like a terrorist.

    I understand the director of To Kill a Mockingbird is going to release a version with an all white cast to remove the racial overtones of the film.

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  61. Why I don't have a problem with this by CathedralRulz · · Score: 1
    I realize that Lucas had a vision for these movies, and that technology and budget limited this vision for the first three films.

    That he is now able to bring the original three films closer to this vision, I think, is wonderful. It may inspire others who were limited by budget and technology to go make re-releases of their films. Good example: ET

    I understand the arguments of the purist who would prefer to leave things as they are. I think the people who made ET got it right - they made the DVD with both the completely un-retouched version and the 'updated' version that is closer to the creator's vision.

  62. this is a trick by imr · · Score: 2

    to get good ideas from millions of fans.
    Here is my addition to those scripts:
    don't touch the original trilogy, write a new script and do episodes 7, 8 and 9.
    american director are too lazy when it comes to stories: sequels and re-make.

  63. Jar Jar is Chewbacca by smoondog · · Score: 2

    I thought Jar Jar dies in Ep III. Maybe now he is just lobotamized and he forgets to shave. No more "Meesa please", just growls and undiscernable barks. Jar Jar is dead, long live Jar Jar!

    -Sean

  64. Just Great by roccothegreat · · Score: 1

    Great news, I can just see Jar Jar in Episode IV: A New Hope . . . . "Me sa Jar Jar Binks" 'pause' "Whos sa you be?" 'enter Darth Vader' "Me sa Darth Vader, Me sa get rid of you once and for all!!!" I hope this is how it turns out

  65. King of the Almighty Dollar by molrak · · Score: 1

    It wouldn't be surprising if LUCass decides to redo the original trilogy.... again. It'd mean more green in his pockets. Consider: A New Hope (or just Star Wars as it was called back then), had a re-release in theaters just after it's original run. All three of the original films were re-released as 'special' editions in 1997, supposedly to hype the forthcoming prequel trilogy. The number of VHS incarnations of the original trilogy: There were the original releases, all with different box covers. There was the black box THX classic version. There was the Gold box Special Edition (and silver box for wide screen). There was the Special Edition White box (and it's wide screen cousin), which contained Episode 2 film. The black box and gold box also had official laserdisc releases(the originals may have as well, I'm not aware of them though). On top of just the film releases, there's the countless action figures, Expanded Universe books(and audio books), lunchboxes, comic books, sound tracks, costumes, high dollar collectibles, and everyone's favorite, the Jar-Jar shaped eraser. The almighty dollar was the Phantom Menace behind episode one, but e2 suffers from Lucas' loss of touch with this nice little thing called story-telling. We should have seen the loss of ability coming, especially with some of the changes made in the 'special' editions of the original trilogy, the most glaring in A New Hope. (The worst being the infamous 'Greedo shooting first' fiasco, and the totally unnecessary addition of Boba Fett to the film). Many people say Lucas has fallen in love with special effects, I think he's fallen in love with greed.

    --
    You're only as smart as your brain.
    1. Re:King of the Almighty Dollar by nucal · · Score: 2
      It wouldn't be surprising if LUCass decides to redo the original trilogy.... again. It'd mean more green in his pockets. Consider: A New Hope (or just Star Wars as it was called back then), had a re-release in theaters just after it's original run. All three of the original films were re-released as 'special' editions in 1997, supposedly to hype the forthcoming prequel trilogy.

      Exactly ... I bought one set of tapes ("never to be released again"), only to have the version with Jabba the Hut added to "Episode IV" come out one month later. The only Star Wars item I'd even consider buying at this point is a bootleg of the Christmas Special .....

  66. Look on the bright side by Washizu · · Score: 5, Funny

    At least this opens the possibility that Lucas could redo Episode I.

    --
    OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
    1. Re:Look on the bright side by room101 · · Score: 2

      Great, then he will want to change all the rest to reflect changes to Episode I. Thus generating a truly recursive series?

      We could be getting DVD releases of this stuff for years to come.

      --
      room101 -- how much can you stand before they break you?
      (they always break you eventually)
    2. Re:Look on the bright side by rlangis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He already DID.

      Anyone else remember the scene in the Naboo cruiser where Jar-Jar popped the head off of the red droid? Said droid then went crazy around the droid bay while R2 and the others went up to fix the shield generators?

      It was in the movie, but NOT in the VHS nor DVD editions.

      --
      GIR: I'm going to sing the Doom song now. Doom doom doom doom doom doom de-doom doom doom doom doom doom doom...
  67. A very clever plan by 47PHA60 · · Score: 2

    Lucas wants to erase the cultural memory that the first film was good, the second better, and it all went into the toilet after that.

    Having learned from the previous Special Editions that it is possible to make a good film worse, he will now bring all the films to the same level of quality, thus shutting down any future debates over which movies were worse than the others.

    Unfortunately, his benchmark for quality seems to be that late-70's made-for-TV Wookie holiday special.

    Besides, re-editing the original films could make them better, you know (it worked for the video/cable release of Battlefield Earth. Right?)

  68. From the SlashDot Rumor Mill Dept. . . by PhxBlue · · Score: 3, Funny

    May I suggest a change of motto?

    Rumors for Nerds. Tabloid that Thinks it Matters.

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  69. padme in rtoj by mdouglas · · Score: 1

    the only purpose i can imagine for putting padme in rotj would be to include her in the "ghost revue" along with yoda, obiwan, and anakin. although i don't know how that would work as she's not a jedi.

  70. This could work out well... by Cirrocco · · Score: 1
    Think about it...Natalie Portman replaces Fisher in the scene in 'Jedi' where Luke explains that he and Leia are brother and sister. Good move! Fisher was awful in that scene.


    Portman replaces Leia in the slave outfit. Not that I thought Fisher wasn't hot, but now we get to see Portman as well!


    Portman re-enacts the scenes that Fisher was too coked-out to do well...think about it, folks...

    1. Re:This could work out well... by {tele}machus_*1 · · Score: 1
      Fisher was awful in that scene.
      You say that as if Hammil was good. The best thing that could happen to the original three movies would be replacing Hammil with someone who could act. But of course, we wouldn't want to raise the bar for the prequel movies (which contain similarly poor acting--even from the good actors).
    2. Re:This could work out well... by gaudior · · Score: 2
      poor acting--even from the good actors

      George Lucas should NOT be allowed to write dialogue (deeply, truly love you), or direct actors, ever again. It's the worst part of the last 2 movies. He doesn't know how to make us care about these people.

      The only really good acting was from Count Sarumann, uh, Dooku, and that was mainly the result of Christopher Lee playing himself. I really expected him to point at Anakin and spin him around, just off the ground.

      I love Samuel L. Jackson, but it's been 2 movies in a row where he hasn't had ANY dialogue to work with.

  71. Candidates for new name by volpe · · Score: 1, Offtopic


    What will it be called, Super Special Edition? Speciai Edition Pro? 32-Bit Special Edition Turbo?

    Star Wars Millenium Edition
    Star Wars XP
    Star Wars# .NET

    1. Re:Candidates for new name by Claric · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm thinking more along the lines of Street Fighter 2

      Star Wars
      Star Wars Special Edition
      Star Wars Turbo
      Star Wars Turbo Champions Edition
      Super Star Wars Turbo

      Let's not forget the hacked Japanese imports where Luke Skywalker does two fireballs that move in a sine-wave pattern.

      Repeat the above with Star Wars Alpha.

      Claric

      --
      There's no problem that cannot be solved with a suitable amount of high explosives
    2. Re:Candidates for new name by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      Then the spin offs, Star Wars vs. Star Trek.

    3. Re:Candidates for new name by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      or star trek vs babalon 5

      with 2 star wars characters in it.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  72. There's a whole new generation to exploit now! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1

    That's why Lucas is doing this... for the $$$$$.
    Why not do it? By re-releasing the original trilogy, not only does he get a chance to make a pile of dough from those who were babies (or not even born) when the original come out, but he also gets to do it for a fraction of the cost of three new movies. Then by throwing in a bit of fluff, he figures that he'll also be able to attract older people who have already seen the movie before.

    The dark side has and always will be (greed for)money. Pure and simple.....

  73. Here is another idea- Star Wars Themes! by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

    Once done with all 6 edisodes, he would go back and make themed versions. Say, replace the Ewoks with Cabbage Patch kids! Or switch the Gungans with the stormtroopers. R rated version with topless Portman and Fisher (maybe even in the same scene!). Star Wars: The Celebrity Version- latest boy band as Jedis, latest girl singer as lead female, couple of rappers as bad guys, etc. My favorite switch would be to switch Admiral Ackbar with Captain Picard, but leave the voice the same.

    On topic- Lucas has always said he thinks of movies as never being done, they are abandoned. Though I think one can end up tinkering too much and screwing up (Jedi's new end song didn't do it for me).

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  74. In the words of Obi-wan by Guitarzan · · Score: 1

    He is more machine now than man. Twisted and evil.

  75. People'r just pissed because.. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    It's another revision to buy.

    Soemone on Aint It Cool News replied with the fact that The Hobbit was also re-written to fill in gaps in the story with Lord of the Rings.

    The Hitch Hiker's series was the same way... And god knows how many other works of fiction. This is lucas' grand opus(like, howard the duck wasn't), and if he wants to make changes, then dammit, let him make them.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    1. Re:People'r just pissed because.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >lucas' grand opus(like, howard the duck wasn't)

      Woah. Lucas directed Howard the Duck? That explains a lot. yessiree.

    2. Re:People'r just pissed because.. by Thud457 · · Score: 0

      The Hitchhiker's guide trilogy was intentionally inconsistant. With Lucas, it's just incompetence.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    3. Re:People'r just pissed because.. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      like LOTR, and the Hobbit weren't? Besides, it's not like Lucas is directly taxing you from your paycheck for his changes..

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  76. The Return of... by goldspider · · Score: 1

    At the very least, the new trilogy would have to include "The Return of the Return of the Jedi".

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:The Return of... by Teknogeek · · Score: 0

      "We now return to The Return of the Pink Pather Returns. Starring Ken Walsh as Inspector Clouseau."

      --
      I mod down anyone who uses M$ in their posts. I like to live on the edge.
  77. cultural consequences on the horizon by FuddChuckles · · Score: 1

    I like the idea, personally (as long as I have already bought my unadulterated copies).

    What I find most compelling about the idea is the ability for the movie industry to release a film and then correct errors in later editions. If a scene makes no sense or an actor sucks dead air, why not use Lucas' cinematic magic wand to correct or delete the problem in version 2.0?

    Now for homework, I want everybody to think of the top edit they would make to an already released film. Personally, I would have made the Titanic sink within the first 10 minutes of the movie. Wishful thinking....

    -FC

  78. A better revision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Re-release AOTC with JarJar killing Aniken and
    taking his place .... It couldn't be worse!

  79. Re:I knew it.... Star Wars XP - by mjstrom · · Score: 4, Funny

    with new integrated scenses - they're part of the script, they can't be removed.

  80. Duh by dfn5 · · Score: 1
    George Lucas May Be Completely Evil

    Well, Duh!!!!

    I'm just glad that my wide screen Laser Discs of the Trilogy are still in perfect condition.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  81. How did this get posted. by SunCrushr · · Score: 0

    This is a dumb article. Its rumor mongering, not "News for Nerds". I guess it must be a slow news day or something.

    1. Re:How did this get posted. by equus · · Score: 1

      It's chrisd. What do you expect?

  82. John Williams is already altering the score. by linderdm · · Score: 1

    According to this article John Williams is already working on changing the scores to the original trilogy. One of the changes is adding the Imperial March to ANH.

    1. Re:John Williams is already altering the score. by Kredal · · Score: 2

      I kinda wondered about that. I thought it would have been better if Williams just used the "evil bad guy" theme from ANH in Episode 2, and just a hint of the Imperial March at the end of the credits...

      But I suppose changing ANH's score to include the march would work too. (:

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  83. E.T. by carpoon · · Score: 1

    Maybe he'll turn the light sabers into walkie talkies like in E.T.

  84. Didnt you see the Simpsons episode... by Kynde · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jar-Jar sure aint "UNIVERSALLY" reviled.
    Hasn't anyone seen the Simpsons episode where the comic store clerk goes to sleep with a life-sized Jar-Jar doll saying "Oh Jar-Jar, no one loves you but me..." .

    Groening couldn't have been more correct there...

    --
    1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
    1. Re:Didnt you see the Simpsons episode... by Thud457 · · Score: 0

      And as all interweb nerds know, where Groening and reality disagree, it is obviously reality that is in error!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    2. Re:Didnt you see the Simpsons episode... by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Eric Cartman likes Jakovosaurs, which are Jar-Jar-like.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    3. Re:Didnt you see the Simpsons episode... by mcknation · · Score: 1


      It wasen't a life-sized Jar Jar. Only a regular sized one.

      McK

    4. Re:Didnt you see the Simpsons episode... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you.

    5. Re:Didnt you see the Simpsons episode... by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 0

      Wasn't that Simpson's joke a reference to the Jimmy Swaggert comment about the large sized Jar Jar doll. He claimed that there were several points of entery that a child might use the doll for masterbation purposes.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    6. Re:Didnt you see the Simpsons episode... by r00st3r · · Score: 1

      Alas, after the last few seasons of unfunny and unimaginative episodes, I just can't watch the Simpsons anymore.

      --
      "Me mule wouldn't work in the mud. So I had to put seventeen bullets in 'er!" - Willy
    7. Re:Didnt you see the Simpsons episode... by permaculture · · Score: 1

      "Jar Jar Binks makes the Ewoks look like fucking Shaft" Tim Bisley, Spaced 2. :-)

      --
      Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
    8. Re:Didnt you see the Simpsons episode... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Hasn't anyone seen the Simpsons episode where the comic store clerk goes to sleep with a life-sized Jar-Jar doll saying "Oh Jar-Jar, no one loves you but me..." .

      While we're trading anecdotes, see Spaced, Series 2.

      • Comic shop owner:All right, Return of the Jedi. Look at the Ewoks. They were crap!
      • Tim: All right, but Jar Jar Binks makes the Ewoks looking like... fucking Shaft.

      After the emotional assraping delivered by TPM and (to a lesser extent) AotC, my one comfort is that the funniest comedy series of recent years is only available on Region 2 DVD, and that most US citizens won't see it, or know about it, or figure out how to get their DVD players to play it even if I gave it to them. That's cold comfort, but I take it where I can get it.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  85. Natalie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Id like to insert some hot grits into Natalie Portman. But seriously I hope I never see another Star wars movie after the insipid movie Attack of the Clones

  86. You are a sheep. Baa! Baa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " So we get bullshit like Episode I"

    Episode 1 was the original star wars movie. The Episode 4 crap came after Lucas figured out there was big money in it.

    But make no mistake, the movie that's out now is episode 5. Unless you forget what's really happening and only remember what Lucas want you to.

    Baa! Baa!

  87. Who gives a damn? by jcoleman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The movies are the sole intellectual property of GEORGE LUCAS. They do not belong to you. They do not belong to the fans. They do not belong to the merchandisers. They belong to LucasFilm, which in turn belongs to George Lucas.

    These six movies are a saga. They tell a long, complex story with lots of twists and turns. When Lucas comes up with what he thinks is a good idea, he puts it in the mix. If he has to change a couple of things around to fit it in, he does. Big deal. It's not like he's going to change his mind on Darth Vader being Luke's father.

    He can do whatever he wants with his movies, and personally I think he's doing a fantastic job. All six movies will fit together as a cohesive whole when it's all said and done.

    This ain't Shakespeare, folks. Even Tolkien went back and corrected some continuity problems after LotR was published. So get over it.

    1. Re:Who gives a damn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw off, man. We, the true fans, have made Lucas the monster he's become. It's about time he owes us a good movie. But that's not gonna happen as Spider-Man is a far superior movie.

    2. Re:Who gives a damn? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      they do not belong to you. They do not belong to the fans. They do not belong to the merchandisers. They belong to LucasFilm, which in turn belongs to George Lucas."

      We pay to watch those movies, we want good stuff. Thanks to the backwards movie industry, we pay for movies and THEN watch them. We can't get our money back because the movie was horribly written.

      So yes, we own it. We don't pay for it, it don't exist. Lucas'd be smart to listen to us.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Who gives a damn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, yeah, you're wrong.

    4. Re:Who gives a damn? by jcoleman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He owes you a good movie? Listen to yourself.

      The "true fans." This is the problem with the movie industry. Everyone is so busy catering to the "true fans" that people forget about making good films. "Oooo, the Tolkien fans won't like it if we take something out of the book." "Oooo, the Star Wars fans won't like it if we put Jar Jar in the next movie."

      The fans' opinion does not matter. If you are truly concerned with artists making good films, then quit expecting them to cater to your every whim. It is not your film. Even if you have every single Star Wars figure, book, bedspread, drinking glass, etc., you still have no say in what an artist puts into his art. You don't hear art collectors saying "I like Starry Night, but I wish Van Gogh had put some more red in it. He owed it to us to paint a picture that we'd like."

      If you don't like what the artist has to say, how his story is told, or what accent his characters speak with then don't buy his work. No one is forcing you.

      You are truly the epitomy of a consumer.

    5. Re:Who gives a damn? by crimoid · · Score: 2


      Thanks to the backwards movie industry, we pay for movies and THEN watch them.

      The vast majority of merchants (in ANY industry) will not give you 100% use out of a product or service and allow you to pay later with zero penalty. How the movie industry is somehow backwards because they use practically universal pay-then-use business practices is beyond me.

    6. Re:Who gives a damn? by !Xabbu · · Score: 2

      Dude... you are so mindbogglingly right it hurts. Its too bad that the bulk of fans out there aren't like you... and me for that matter... I loved Ep 1 and I loved Ep 2. They entertained me. Therefore I got my moneys worth.

      --

      - Jimbob
    7. Re:Who gives a damn? by Grip3n · · Score: 1

      Yes, the movie is the property of George Lucas, but lest we forget who the movie was *made* for...us. Most of us don't want to see any modifications made to the originals (save perhaps better light saber fights), and adding new characters etc etc just sounds like George trying to spin the old Wheel of Fortune.

      Remember in the Simpsons episode "The Itchy and Scratchy and Poochie Show" when Lisa detects the new character on the show as being a "desperate attempt by writers".

      As for the Tolkien note, be made corrections, he didn't go in and add entire characters. He explained events where readers needed clairifiction, but the difference here is that Tolkien did it *because* his readers were requesting it, whereas Lucas is doing it for God knows why.

      --
      To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
    8. Re:Who gives a damn? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "The vast majority of merchants (in ANY industry) will not give you 100% use out of a product or service and allow you to pay later with zero penalty"

      Everything I buy at Fred Meyer or Best Buy has a 30-day satisfaction guarantee. Some places charge a restocking fee, fine. That's still better than what you get when you're unsatisfied with a movie.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Who gives a damn? by jcoleman · · Score: 2

      I saw Ep 2 in DLP this past weekend. I recommend it if you can find it near you. I actually drove three hours to see it and it was worth every drop of gas.

      Digital exhibition is truly the future of motion pictures. You will love it...so clear, so crisp, so vibrant, and no scratches, jitter, or that irritating projector noise.

    10. Re:Who gives a damn? by ipjohnson · · Score: 1

      Should you get your money back if the sports team you go see doesn't play up to your expectation?

      Its a gamble ... but its one you as a consumer have to take. sorry thems the rules.

    11. Re:Who gives a damn? by Servo5678 · · Score: 4, Funny
      It's not like he's going to change his mind on Darth Vader being Luke's father.

      The Year: 2007. The Empire Strikes Back: Ultimate Edition hits the screens.

      In a controversially updated scene, Luke follows Darth Vader to the Cloud City of Bespin, where at the climactic moment of the legendary lightsaber duel, Vader says...

      "No, Luke... meesa es your father!!!!!"

    12. Re:Who gives a damn? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      That's not apples to apples. You can enjoy a sports game even if the team loses. Besides, you can watch most sports on TV.

      Face it: Movies are not quality entertainment. The majority of movies out there don't spend enough time worrying about entertaining the audience like they did years ago. Give people a chance to say "I don't like it, here is your penalty", and hopefully we'll see the quality creep back up again. It'd certainly cause George Lucas to enlist some help in making Episode 3 to make sure it doesn't bore the shit out of everybody like 2 did.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    13. Re:Who gives a damn? by marick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The movies are the sole intellectual property of GEORGE LUCAS.

      Ok, I agree, George Lucas owns those movies. But the ideas he put down on film in episodes 4-6 are our common experience. They are part of our culture. We know what happened in the first star wars trilogy and we know what didn't happen.

      I'm from Boston, and I know that in 1986, the Red Sox lost the world series on a grounder through the legs of Bill Buckner. I also know that the Red Sox DID NOT win the world series, have not since 1918. As much as I wish it could be otherwise, this is the way the world is.

      Fiction is otherwise, but it's still a shared common experience. We all know Luke lost his hand in episode 5. We all know Han was encased in carbonite. We all know Yoda dies in episode 6. These are as much facts for us as the 1986 world series or the Apollo moon landing or 9/11/2001 or Tiennanmen Square.

      Now, suppose George Lucas could rewrite history. Would we approve? No, of course not. This is, in many ways, no different. Jar Jar Binks was not in "A New Hope". But now Lucas is saying "No, no, I can change history. I own this Intellectual Property and can do as I wish with it.". In short, yes, he CAN make a mockery of our common heritage. I, for one, certainly hope he doesn't.

      Episodes 4-6 stand on their own as a saga of epic proportions. They live on in my mind as memories of happy days in the past, before the dark times, before Jar Jar. I only hope my children will have the opportunity to feel the same way.

    14. Re:Who gives a damn? by BryanL · · Score: 0

      "This ain't Shakespeare, folks." Even if it was Shakespeare, The Bard made many changes to his plays after they were performed on stage for the first time.(Though Lucas has a long way to go to match the writing of Shakespeare.)

    15. Re:Who gives a damn? by QuasEye · · Score: 1

      Uh... Been to a restaurant lately?

    16. Re:Who gives a damn? by vrassoc · · Score: 1
      This ain't Shakespeare, folks

      It could be the Shakespeare of the future though. In fact it would be downright nasty if I had to read some dead guy's waffling, written while he was stoned, and my kids don't get to suffer the same torture. (Remember SW was made in the 70s)

      Nice thing in their case will be, if they find out after an exam that their answers were wrong they could pay someone at LucasFilm to change the original.

    17. Re:Who gives a damn? by daveisoverlord · · Score: 1

      Fiction is otherwise, but it's still a shared common experience. We all know Luke lost his hand in episode 5. We all know Han was encased in carbonite. We all know Yoda dies in episode 6. These are as much facts for us as the 1986 world series or the Apollo moon landing or 9/11/2001 or Tiennanmen Square.

      I can see your point about a shared common experience, but I think you're crossing the line between fact and fiction. People died at Tiennanmen Square. That's completely different than Mr. Lucas rewriting his own story. You can't erase the deaths of so many people. You can't just sweep their lives away as if they never existed. But if Mr. Lucas wants to change his story so be it. He is, as many have pointed out here on /., a storyteller. Many stories get refined as they're told. Chris Rock gets to refine his jokes. I hear bootleg live versions of some of his routines and I can see why those versions didn't make it onto the album because they don't flow as well or the timing wasn't as good. Those were public performances and part of someone's shared experience. If Mr. Lucas wants to refine his work, so be it.

      As anthropomorphizing puts human characteristics on to non-human objects, you're putting the characteristics of facts onto fiction. You're talking about something one guy pulled out of his head. It's not like the '86 World Series was something that one guy dreamed up one day and put out there. Unless of course, you're a solipsist, and then there would be no difference between fact and fiction. :)

      --
      The perception of reality is more important than reality itself.
    18. Re:Who gives a damn? by thebruce · · Score: 1

      The fans' opinion does not matter. If you are truly concerned with artists making good films, then quit expecting them to cater to your every whim. It is not your film. Even if you have every single Star Wars figure, book, bedspread, drinking glass, etc., you still have no say in what an artist puts into his art. You don't hear art collectors saying "I like Starry Night, but I wish Van Gogh had put some more red in it. He owed it to us to paint a picture that we'd like."

      Huh... remarkably similar to this free music debate going on... I'm not stating an opinion, just opening up a can of worms here. Think about this...

      ...It is not your music. Even if you have every single album, poster, concert ticket, t-shirt, etc., you still have no say in what an musician puts into his music. You don't hear radio stations saying "I like Beethoven's 5th, but I wish he had put some more drums in it. He owed it to us to write a song that we'd like." If you don't like how the music sounds, how the song is written, or what price you have to pay then don't buy his album (or find a cheaper place). No one is forcing you.

      Ok that strayed a little, but the parallel has to do simply with the fact that people seem to think that once music is released, it becomes their own personal property when they buy an album (under copyrights) and can do whatever they want with it. If the artist has chosen to be under the copyrights the albums are released with, respect that. If you don't like it, don't buy it. Maybe that will change the artist's mind once revenues stop coming in. If an artists decides to give his music away without copyright, sure, go ahead and take advantage of it! Some bands have started doing that, earning more from tours instead of mainly album sales.

      Don't go bitching about how RIAA or DMCA is stealing money or is this massive conspiracy against freedom and all that... the artists under those agreements have chosen to remain there; they don't have to. Convince the artist to change, not go to war with their parent association.

      </rant>

      :)

  88. Re:HEY!...Binks is TOLERATED, not liked by Cirrocco · · Score: 1

    Binks was a necessary part of Palpatine's plan. He's served his purpose. I don't think we'll be seeing much of him after all this. Binks is EVIL, I tells ya! EEEEEVIL! (I just want attention!)

  89. amnesia as a plot device by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny
    Lucas also reportedly told E! Online that the reason droids C-3P0 and R2-D2 have no memory of Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader is because their memories have been wiped prior to the beginning of Episode IV, the original Star Wars movie. "[C-3P0's] memory system has been erased, and so has R2's," Lucas told the site. "So they don't remember anything from the first trilogy. I'm telling you something from Episode III, but I shouldn't be telling you that, but I think most of the fans already know that."

    I wish I couldn't remember anything form the first trilogy either!

    Seriously, though ... it reminds me of one of the Chritopher Reeve Superman movies, where Superman erases Lois' memory, so she won't know for the sequel. Stupid then, stupid now.

    George, why couldn't you have died in the 80s and left us imagining how great the movies could have been?

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  90. You dont need to see these movies... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    ... this is not the special edition your looking for - move along.

  91. Maybe... by tg_schlacht · · Score: 1

    Jar-Jar will get a cameo appearance as a stew-bum in the Mos-Eisly cantina. Maybe Lucas can have him lick someone's boots clean for a drink, like Alan Dean Foster had some miserable alien do in Splinter of the Mind's Eye.

  92. Laserdisc by difool · · Score: 1
    The Special Editions are evil anyway. No way am I buying a copy of A New Hope where Greedo fires first.

    I guess I'll take really good care of my DVD-R backups from The Star Wars Trilogy Definitve Collection Laser Disc set. The laser discs can still be found on eBay occasionally (prices are high though). Get them while they last :-)

    These new rumoured DVDs clearly aren't the discs you are looking for. Move along.

  93. What about the originals? by rob_from_ca · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Personally, I don't care what he does to his movie. The sad part for me is that all the work done on restoring footage and reworking original soundtracks is all thrown into these modified special editions. The _original_ films now only exist as worn VHS tapes. The first special editions were different; not necessarily better, but different. Any further rounds of modification will be different still.

    It's sad that the original films have become lost to consumers, and presumably will stay lost. How about if he releases the original, restored (but unaltered) movies on DVD first. Then he's free to add Jar Jar, Natalie Portman, Samuel Jackson, Matt LeBlanc or whoever the hell else he wants to Episodes IV-VI.

    1. Re:What about the originals? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 3, Funny
      The _original_ films now only exist as worn VHS tapes.

      That's odd. I could swear my laserdiscs were of the original films. Aside from the "A New Hope" title, that is. I hear that got inserted in the years between the original theatrical release and the video release. Damn, I wish I knew what happened to the ancient bootleg VHS copy that my family used to have way back when.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    2. Re:What about the originals? by Krelnik · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If you are careful about the DVD mastering, you can do both, actually. Check out the Terminator 2: Ultimate Edition DVD sometime.

      It's a two disk set (or two sided disk, depending on when you bought it). On the first side/disk are three different edits of the film: the original edit, the "special edition" they did for cable a few years back, and an extended edition (hidden behind an easter egg) that includes a few more scenes that aren't even in the special edition. What's great about it is everyone gets what they want: Cameron can deliver the recut version he likes best, and fans can see the other two versions as well. (Cameron's preference apparently is the middle version, which is why the longest one is hidden behind an easter egg).

      How do they jam three separate edits of a 152 minute movie on one DVD? They don't. They take advantage of the seamless branching functionality that has been in the DVD format all along, and re-use the sections of the flick that are unchanged from one edit to the other.

      Now, the question is: is Lucas is smart enough to do this?

    3. Re:What about the originals? by rob_from_ca · · Score: 1

      My bad, forgot all about laserdiscs. I think it has something to do with all that disc switching while watching the CAV version (only 30 min per side) of the whole trilogy back to back before Episode I came out. :-)

    4. Re:What about the originals? by slipgun · · Score: 1

      The _original_ films now only exist as worn VHS tapes

      Thankfully, not quite - there are plenty of avis and mpegs floating around. George ain't gonna be able to destroy all of them in a hurry...

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    5. Re:What about the originals? by rob_from_ca · · Score: 1

      There are a few problems with that though...one is that some players (especially earlier ones) handle seamless branching very badly, doing everything from small skips on the branch to freezes and pauses to totally crashing the player. Hopefully as branching becomes more common those problems will (mostly) dissolve. The bigger problem is that with the special editions, it wasn't just added scenes that could be branched around, there were lots and lots of visual elements inserted into scenes, so you'd need two complete versions of a lot of scenes on the disc, one with and one without. It would take up a lot of disc space, and would tax branching to its limit (exposing more bugs in players and you reach out of the "comfortable" regions of the DVD spec, bringing us back to the first problem). It would be a tough balance to put both versions on a disc and not overcompress the video.

      ESB and ROTJ would probably be better suited to this, since there were less scenes with added visual elements, mostly just visual cleanups (which can stay) and added scenes. A New Hope is the hard one to do. I'd rather they just make a finaly, definitive release of the original version, with just restored film and soundtrack, given as much bandwidth as possible on the disc. That's something I'd buy in a heartbeat. Better yet, put it on D-Theater, but that's probably just wishful thinking.

    6. Re:What about the originals? by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

      If you have a DVD player that dosent do seamless branching, then you dont have a DVD player. Its in the spec. Bitch to your vender if you want, but you cant complain to a DVD maker for making a DVD that dosent play on your notquiteDVD player.

    7. Re:What about the originals? by rob_from_ca · · Score: 1

      My DVD player works fine. Doesn't change the fact that there are thousands of playes out there that don't, because of a buggy or incomplete implementation. That means if a company releases a seamless branching disc, they need to be ready for a lot of returns and support calls from angry customers. It's definitely the DVD player's manufacturer's fault, but most consumers aren't going to realize that right off the bat.

      How well does your DVD player handle progammed pan and scan (putting the widescreen movie on a disc, along with a control track that tells the player where to zoom and pan to create a reasonable pan and scan version on the fly)? That's part of the spec, but I can't think of a single disc that has used it yet, so the players, if they implement it at all, have at least relatively untested implementations, that are probably very buggy.

      Also cheaper players often skimp on some of the peices of the spec. Layer switches are supposed to be _completely_ seamless, but how many players reall achieve that? How many players implement flag reading 3:2 pull down correctly for progressive output? Almost none. Hell, my old Toshiba 3108 2nd gen player from so long ago that I've moved to my bedroom doesn't even play DVD's with DVD-ROM content on them; it just locks up immediately requring a reboot (via unplugging) to start going again. Since it's out of warranty, Toshiba wants me to ship it to them and spend $50 to upgrade the firmware.

      This is not an unusal example; the DVD spec is pretty large and complex, and the chances of getting a full blown, good performing implementation in a $150-100 player are generally pretty low. Certainly it's not one of the features that people base their decisions on.

      So all I'm sayin' is, as a software manufacturer, it's an issue for them. Perhaps something like "Star Wars" would be enough of a killer app for people to get really pissed that their player didn't work with it, and force manufacturers into fixing their buggy implmentations. Who knows...

    8. Re:What about the originals? by T-Ranger · · Score: 1
      One of my pet peves is people purchasing tools that dont meet the well defined spec and then later complain that there thing is broken. You bought it, suck it up.

      My favourite (most hated?) example is the 1024 week roll over problem with GPS receivers. One of the first public whitepapers/specs clearly spelt out the problem, and while it diddnt mention a solution (a implementaion problem), the problem was public as long as the GPS spec itself was public.. Living on the coast around that time there were numerous news stories from the coast guard and fishermen complaning about how there old receivers will stop working and how all hell will break loose. If you happen to be operating a craft with a broken GPS receiver which stops working at the roll over point then your responsible for purchasing that POS. And if you happened to cause an accident due to you POS, IMNSOHO you are criminaly responsible.

      But I digress. Off the top of my head I cant think of how opearating a broken DVD player might be life threating. Im almost positive that there is some group that licenses manufacturers to use the phrase 'dvd player', even if its a group of dvd plyer makers.. In a perfect world that group should be more stringnant on who they issue there stickers to. Or prehaps even better have levels of compliance. IE have discs that implement seamless branching labeled as such ala Dolby extensions to analogue tapes, and players clearly labeled with what features they can and cant support, with a non catastrofic failure mode.

    9. Re:What about the originals? by tempfile · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't be able to do this unless they give the original movie the same restoration that was done for the SE. Otherwise, the scenes that have been altered for the SE would stand out appearancewise if you were watching the classic.

    10. Re:What about the originals? by rob_from_ca · · Score: 1

      I realize this is carrying the discussion far beyond what is necessary, but I think you're missing the point a little.

      Number one, I don't care that much, especially about my own player. My "broken" DVD player sits in my bedroom getting barely used if at all; if I cared I'd get it fixed. My primary DVD player plays all discs I've found so far.

      2nd, it's not easy for the average consumer to find out if a player implements the spec. The real spec is only available if you license it as a manufacturer, which costs thousands of dollars; not really in most people's budget, or area of technical expertise. There's pretty much no way for the average consumer (or even a knowledgeable one really )to check for spec compliance. I suppose if you wanted to drop a few hundred bucks one one of the testing discs, you could go to a store and spend an hour with the player to see if it worked. Again, this is far beyond what most people are willing (or should have) to do. I think it's pretty arrogant on the part of designers to assume the public will be willing to do this for a $100-300 purchase. The manual and brochure for every player is going to say they support all DVD features, regardless of truth or quality.

      Yes, it bugs me when people expect perfect, flawless performance from something like a DVD player when they buy a no-name one for $50 instead of purchasing a decent one; obviously you're going to lose some functionality. But the fact is that most people won't accept that; if it says 'DVD Player' on it, then they're going to expect it to play all DVD discs flawlessly. Look at the first low end "Progressive" DVD Player from Pioneer (DV-434 I believe...). The only point of progressive scan is to improve image quality, yet it was implemented so badly that image quality was noticably reduced. Some people were mad, most never noticed.

      The DVD spec is large and complicated, and is not just a checkbox sign off list. DVD's and their players are basically software, which means when making a disc or a player, all you can do is test the crap out of them. The software engineering techniques used are no better than anywhere else, so there are going to be defects that slip into products, whether they be spec interpertation errors, deliberate corner cutting, or implementation errors. Period.

      So when making a disc with a target audience of 35 million installed customers (or whatever number it gets to), it is typically in the manufacturer's best interest to stay within "safe" parts of the spec (just as just playing to movie and putting a few audio tracks on it) that pretty much all players have been extremely well tested under in all circumstances. That helps ensure less support calls and angry customers, which means more profit.

      Branching is pretty rare, so you've got a large possibility of it not playing on a lot of players, which means more people are going to take it back and you're going to make less money. If it's a release such as Star Wars targetted at everyone, then it's very possible the media spin would make it look like your fault and you'd be stuck in a recall situation (or at least a bad PR spot). Something like the Terminator Ultimate edition is targeted at a much smaller audience (since there is already another (or is it two) release of the movie that the public has purchased), so it's much easier to justify branching.

      Bottom line is, the manufacturers want to generally keep it simple, to ensure maximum hardware compatibility, which will help maximize their profits. Some manufacturers like the cutting edge though and will deal with the problems, typically those have a smaller potential audience.

      So all I'm saying is that we probably won't have a branching version of Star Wars for a variety of reasons (content mastering difficulties really be the primary one). If we do, great, as long as it works on most players. I'd prefer (and spend the money for) a seperate disc version though, because it would leave more room for extras and be guaranteed to play on just about anything.

      Okay. I'm done now. :-)

  94. Yo lay off Jar Jar by opencity · · Score: 1

    Having finally bothered to rent Episode 1 I don't get the Jar Jar fiasco. How is he more offensive than the planet of the teddy bears in 3? Lucas should be nailgunned to a chair and forced to watch LOTR until he can make movies without marketing tie-ins (like THX)

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
  95. Not only wrong quote... by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    Yoda tells Luke that he trained Vader, that Vader was his student when so far that doesn't seem to be the case.

    My only problem is that I think some of Eps II that hit the cutting room floor and the short span of digital recording time made the actors seem horrible.

    If things get inserted smoothly and correct then it's okay.

    Maybe she isn't a ghost, maybe she talks to them and they don't know it or something... she's underground?

    1. Re:Not only wrong quote... by nomadic · · Score: 2

      Sure it is, Yoda apparently trains all the young Jedi.

    2. Re:Not only wrong quote... by pyros · · Score: 1

      No, Obi Wan tells Luke he thought he could train Anakin as well as Yoda, but he was wrong.

    3. Re:Not only wrong quote... by shrik3 · · Score: 1

      Yoda tells Luke that he trained Vader, that Vader was his student when so far that doesn't seem to be the case.

      It was Obi-Wan who told Luke that he trained Vader.

    4. Re:Not only wrong quote... by Zonekeeper · · Score: 0

      If things get inserted smoothly and correct then it's okay.

      First we have talk about Natalie Portman in leather in this thread, and now this. Yeah, I'm gonna get work done now. Heh.

    5. Re:Not only wrong quote... by reverius · · Score: 2

      Why do I recall that in Empire Strikes Back, on Dagobah, Yoda says something about "i cannot train this one, he has no patience" immediately before/after (I don't remember) referring to how he trained Anakin? Or am I crazy?

      -- Reverius

    6. Re:Not only wrong quote... by Zordak · · Score: 1
      Yoda tells Luke that he trained Vader, that Vader was his student when so far that doesn't seem to be the case.

      Maybe he's using the term "trained" as an indirect relation, since Dooku was Yoda's Padwan, Qui Gon Jinn was Dooku's Padwan, Obi-Wan was Jinn's Padwan, and Anakin is Obi-Wan's Padwan. That would make Yoda Anakin's Great-Great GrandJediMaster or something like that.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    7. Re:Not only wrong quote... by shrik3 · · Score: 1

      I actually dug up my old Star Wars tapes and checked =) It was in A New Hope (ep IV)

      It goes like this:
      (Luke and Obi-Wan are talking after the tusken attack)
      Luke: How did my father die?
      Obi-Wan: A young jedi named Darth Vader, who was a pupil of mine, until he turned to evil and helped the empire hunt down and destroy the jedi knights. He betrayed and murdered your father.

    8. Re:Not only wrong quote... by reverius · · Score: 2

      Try watching the Dagobah scene in ESB, and tell me there's not a reference in there to Yoda teaching Anakin...?

      It's possible they are both correct. I think that it is true that Yoda teaches -all- Jedi... until they are taken as Padawan learners by other Jedi Masters. Remember the scene in Episode II with Yoda's 30-some-odd students? :)

      -- Reverius

    9. Re:Not only wrong quote... by jafac · · Score: 2

      yeah yeah, and in EIV, Obi Wan says that the Jedi defended justice in the old republic for over 1000 generations. In EI and II, it's 1000 years. Unless those Jedi breed really freaking fast.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    10. Re:Not only wrong quote... by shrik3 · · Score: 1

      Back to the VHS it is then.. =) Quotes from ESB:

      Yoda talks to Luke in his hut on Dagobah:

      Yoda: I cannot teach him. The boy has no patience.
      Obi-Wan: He will learn
      Yoda: Much anger in him. Like his father.
      Obi-Wan: Was I any different when you taught me?

      The only reference here is to Yoda teaching Obi-Wan, possibly as a child.

    11. Re:Not only wrong quote... by brianber · · Score: 1

      In ROJ:

      Obi-wan: "When I first knew him, your father was already a great pilot, but I was amazed how strongly the Force was with him. I took it upon myself to train him as a Jedi. I thought I could that I could instruct him just as well as Yoda. I was wrong."

    12. Re:Not only wrong quote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This seems to imply that Obi-Wan believed he could provide the same quality of training to Anakin, as Yoda provided to other Jedi... Pretty straightforward it seems...

    13. Re:Not only wrong quote... by matrix29 · · Score: 2

      yeah yeah, and in EIV, Obi Wan says that the Jedi defended justice in the old republic for over 1000 generations. In EI and II, it's 1000 years. Unless those Jedi breed really freaking fast.

      I would suspect that is where the "force", "the force-push", and "Jedi mind tricks" come in handy.
      (Speaking of that I'm reminded of a joke.)
      Chinese man say, "He who pleasures himself always come in handy later on."

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    14. Re:Not only wrong quote... by reverius · · Score: 1

      Yup, I was remembering it wrong... d'oh.

      Apparently Yoda did teach Obi-Wan as a child, before Qui-Gon picked him up as his padawan. Interesting tidbit.

      But then again, there's evidence that Yoda teaches -every- Jedi as a child. But I think that's just speculation.

      -- Reverius

  96. It must be true... by JasonMaggini · · Score: 1

    Because AIN'T IT COOL NEWS posts HEADLINES IN CAPS!!!! And they use a lot of EXCLAMATION POINTS!!! It HAS to BE real!!!!!!!!!!

  97. Another remastered, special, limited, digital.... by Parsa · · Score: 1

    edition? How many of these can he do? He's already done how many special releases of the 1st trilogy on VHS? 3? 4? And none of those on DVD, yet he has done Ep 1 on DVD.

    I know he's said he's waiting for all 3 new movies to come out before the original's are available on DVD but this just kinda sucks.

    Ep 2 will be available on DVD by itself, then Ep 3. Then he will release all 3 as a box set with special commemorative features. Then the first 3 will be released individually, then as a box set suped up with special features for them. Then he'll release a massive box set with all the special features plus some.

    If something like this happens which I'm sure it will, the fans would have spent somewhere close to...well I don't know how much, but a hell of a lot...for all of it if you want to see the extra stuff.

    Lucas is evil. Actually this sounds like something Pitr from userfriendly.org would do.

    --
    Abiit, excessit, evasit, erupit.
  98. Polymorphic movies by slstickle · · Score: 1

    In an age of dynamic websites and self-configuring computer games (e.g., NetHack), why should movies stay static over time? I, for one, think that the possibilities in altering movies to adapt and add new and interesting ideas is an excellent one!

    Movies are the modern theater for the masses. Theater, though, is staged and restaged. You think of a better way to cut Hamlet on stage? A more interesting spin on Oedipus? Go for it. The actors play the parts different, the costumes change, and so forth, and sometimes wholesale change in the dialogue is ordered. But people don't seem to get that pissed off that Ran is different than King Lear, because the differences are half the interest.

    If we can reconfigure movies, cutting and mixing them like music to create new and interesting variations that strengthen the original material or take it into new directions, then why shouldn't we. People like techno remixes of songs, why shouldn't we also get remixes of movies?

    The obvious point of difference, of course, is that Lucas is trying to turn a quick buck off a probably-simplistic remix. When the tools to do this sort of thing are in the hands of the people (and they become so, more and more), then the real interesting remixes will happen.

    But why not use some old footage and a powerful computer to make our own remixes of Chewie beating the crap out of Jar-Jar? Or of Princess Leia and Padme Amidala snapping on their lightsabers to battle, side by side, the Borg (crossover remix).

    That Lucas will generate another Greedo-firing-first crapmix shouldn't discredit the inherent coolness of the idea.

    1. Re:Polymorphic movies by happyclam · · Score: 2

      In other news...

      • Disney will re-release Snow White to give Dopey a larger role and to make Snow White an Asian-American.
      • Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid will be re-released with five new scenes developing and exploring the poignant, touching love relationship between Butch and Sundance.
      • The entire Three Stooges collection will be rereleased to reduce the violence and focus more on the development of the characters based primarily on flashbacks to their childhood and their relationship with their parents.
      • The Sound of Music will be given three more musical scenes, including "Springtime for Hitler" performed by digital representations of a young Christopher Plummer and Julie Andrews.

      "Because they can!"

      --
      He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    2. Re:Polymorphic movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What you're describing is "Super Smash Star Wars Melee" for the Nintendo GameCube.

      player 1 presses A: "Chew-BACCA"
      player 2 presses A: "Jar-Jar BINKS"

      player 1 presses Start: "Free For All!"

      Hmmm. It just might work.

    3. Re:Polymorphic movies by nat5an · · Score: 1

      Well, as with all things, there are good ideas and bad ideas. Just as there are crap remixes of songs and good remixes of songs. If you don't like something, then don't go see it. Your examples are truly bone-chilling however. :-)

      --
      Head down, go to sleep to the rhythm of the war drums...
  99. Darth Jar Jar by dissonant7 · · Score: 1

    I just like that Episode II finally proves incontrovertably that Jar Jar is EVIL... It's all his fault: the empire, the storm troopers, vader, everything! It was his vote...

  100. Leave George Lucas Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Star Wars movies should have been released in the proper order in the first place.

    But, since they have to do this then it's perfectly reasonable to add in a link or two to the prior movies. Much like they added in a not-so-fat Java-the-Hut in Episode 4. Besides, there will most likely be a regular version and director's cut of extended scene section on the DVDs so that you can actually play both movie versions. Terminator 2 had a setting for the regular film and one for the film with extra scenes smoothly added in.

    John S

    JPSWeb.net

  101. Maybe Not So Evil... by LittleGuy · · Score: 2

    AICN also reported a wild rumor that the reviled computer-animated character Jar Jar Binks may wind up in a new, revised version of Episode IV.

    In this version, Han does shoot Greedo first, but misses and hits Jar Jar, causing the Gungan to explode into pixelated goo.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    1. Re:Maybe Not So Evil... by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1

      One other post I read on this topic was " like Jar Jar on Alderann for instance". I personally think that would be a good thing, as long as he was still there when they blew it up.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
  102. Which books? by TibbonZero · · Score: 1

    I am assuming you read some of the stuff above in the books. Which books have the Skywalker children?

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Which books? by brianber · · Score: 1
      I am assuming you read some of the stuff above in the books. Which books have the Skywalker children?
      Uh, Almost all of them have Han and Leia's kids in them. In fact, most of the books deal with people trying to kidnap the kids and train them as dark Jedi.
  103. Anonymous Grammar Nazi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's spelled "Padme". In fact, it technically has an accent, as thus (assuming it comes out under "plain text" Slashdot posting):

    Padmé

    If the accent doesn't come out, goto:
    http://www.cupidx-corp.com/pafanlisting/
    . ..and read the title of the page.

  104. Rumours of Episode VI? by Ace905 · · Score: 1

    I haven't even heard rumours yet that Episode 6 was being made. I have however heard it's not being made at all, ever. Any total looser can make up rumours, but only a talking dog can insult them.

    --

    Ace
    1. Re:Rumours of Episode VI? by kasek · · Score: 1

      i hope your joking...seriously.

      if your not, well then heres captain obvious to inform you: Episode 6 has already been made. Its called Return of the Jedi. Its part of the original trilogy.

    2. Re:Rumours of Episode VI? by Ace905 · · Score: 1

      It's not really a serious subject there captain obvious.

      --

      Ace
  105. Natalie again by WildBeast · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Am I the only one who doesn't find her beautiful? I mean she's just your average girl. There's nothing extraordinary about her looks.

    1. Re:Natalie again by t_allardyce · · Score: 2

      Its much like Britney. Except Natalie was actually much more attractive a couple of years ago, where as Britney has always been an average-looking dumb cheerleader-bimbo with little-to-no talent. Its all about hype, popularity and the stupid trendyness/x-factor. But anyway.. here are some good one-liners:

      -Natalie Portman and 'Insert' in the same sentence, yeah baby.

      -They can insert her into any film

      -Error: Please insert Natalie Portman to contine...

      -I hope she inserts herself into my life

      -I've got something you can insert

      -Look, my light-sabre has grown 2 feet!

      -I bet she enjoys a good insertion

      No, but seriously, falling in love with the dark side is evil.

      I prefer Lacey Chabert

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:Natalie again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you're not the only one. I don't see the appeal either. Personally, IMHO, I don't think she can act her way out of a paper bag either. But look at it this way, for millions of geeks the world round, an ordinary girl is as much as they could possibly hope for.

    3. Re:Natalie again by stevey · · Score: 1

      Nope you're not alone. I've never thought she was that special - except the acting in Leon; which was great considering her age at the time.

    4. Re:Natalie again by leifw · · Score: 2
      I'll second that.
      On another note (which I have to admit was picked up on my mother), Portman just doesn't carry herself or deliver lines with the nobility and royalty that Carrie Fisher (Leia) did. Portman sounds much less believable like someone who was trained as royalty.

      Seriously, though, remember the royal, righteous indignation that Fisher delivered when Darth threatened her planet if she wouldn't reveal the location of the rebel base? Portman has never lived up to that. A great opportunity would've been in Ep I when Quigon-Gin told her (masquarading as the handmaiden) what the queen wanted. Instead of carrying even the royal air that you might expect from someone who attends royalty or one who was elected to a leadership position at a young age, she acted like a scolded child.

    5. Re:Natalie again by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      I dunno. I think she's pretty enough -- and hey, let's be honest, I certainly wouldn't kick her out of bed -- but I too have never quite understood the hot grits obsession on /. Maybe that's the joke -- it's a (self-?) parody of fanboy obsessiveness over someone who really isn't THAT outstanding.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    6. Re:Natalie again by beme · · Score: 1

      But she's not just your average girl. She's your average girl.. in space!
      Spacebabe trumps babe most days of the week.

      --

      -beme
      1971
    7. Re:Natalie again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I prefer Lacey Chabert

      I prefer them both...at the same time.

    8. Re:Natalie again by Noobie · · Score: 0

      I saw those topless photos which some paparazzi had taken and I have to agree on this one.

    9. Re:Natalie again by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 1

      She is really, REALLY pretty with a dynamite smile. Big brown eyes...

      Not that I'm about to put fan fiction on her doorstop or anything, but she is cute. The performance was average, I guess, but a lot of that is at the mercy of the director, editor, and writer.

  106. I think it's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why NOT modify movies? People love it when their MMORPGs get updated...

    1. Re:I think it's great by robtm · · Score: 1

      Yes, but when you update a MMORPG you change the future, not the past..

  107. Oh, Essence...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People, get a grip fercryinoutloud! Binks is nothing more than a collection of binary bits!! Stick him in a blender, and you'd end up with a digital frappe' instead of guts. Gut him, and you'd end up with a bucket of random photons.

    He/It/Whatever is NOT WORTH IT. Save your bellyaching for something worthwhile. Perhaps the misuse of /. moderation power to posts that said moderators don't like for personal reasons? ;-)

  108. waiting for dancing Leia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still waiting for the special collector's edition that talked
    about with Princess Leia dancing naked on a desktop.

  109. C-3P0 and R2-D2 have no memory of Anakin Skywalker by ender-iii · · Score: 1

    But what about people's memory? Like Uncle Lois Lars, C3PO lived with him up until his mother died! Then he buys him and doesn't even notice? Fat chance. Unless HE had HIS memory erased.
    I think just maybe Darth would remember him at some point as well...

    --
    ender-iii
  110. Leia remembered her mother the same way people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    say they remember being born.

  111. In other rumors... by Razor+Sex · · Score: 1

    All instances of Chewbacca will be digitally edited out and then replaced with Jar Jar.

  112. He already is evil by kevcol · · Score: 1

    The funniest and most on target AOTC analysis I've seen:

    http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2002/ 05/22/MN37685.DTL

  113. Quit while you're ahead by richlb · · Score: 1

    I've been very disappointed by both new films (Episode I and II) and would not be one bit sad if they decided to can Episode III. I may never look at the two most recent films as part of the Star Wars saga. But, please George, for the love of all that is holy, don't F--- with the originals anymore.

  114. High and Mighty Geeks by CovertSquirrels · · Score: 1

    Where do you guys get off saying that George has no idea what he's doing? Maybe you don't remember the big Chewbacca uproar when he continued to apprear in the 5th and 6th episodes. The riots subsided only after Jedi went to video and people were allowed to fast forward through his scenes.

    JarJar is for the kids that don't care about the "story" like we do. So what if he's lame, my kid let's me watch StarWars whenever I want! That's not an event easily duplicated with a 3 year old.

    Mr. Lucas has brought us countless hours of quality entertainment. I realize that this crowd is a "little" more critical than most others, but why point out the single character mistake when you never think twice about the brilliance of any of the other character choices.

    Of course, what do I know? I took the StarWars sheets off my bed when I turned 12 and I probably misspelled Chewy's name!

  115. Sidebar - Prequel characters on Star Tours by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 2
    There was a sidebar on the story that indicates that the Star Tours ride at Disney World would be retrofitted to include prequel characters. While I don't like tinkering with the original films, this might actually be a good idea for the ride, but not because of the characters.

    When Star Tours first hit Disneyland, I thought it was a great idea, since the big hype was the ability to change films and freshen up the ride regularly. Well, it's been something like ten years and the ride is dusty, poorly maintained, and they still haven't tried to put a new film in the thing. If it takes having the shuttle land on top of Jar Jar to freshen up what's otherwise a great ride, so be it. It is a shame, though, that they (Disney/Lucus) has this ability to change out the films and they never bothered with it.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  116. Killing Jar Jar by jms · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here's an idea.

    Remember the scene where Greedo confronts Han in the cantena. Now we all know that in the original Star Wars, Han shoots first, but for the "special edition", Greedo shoots first, and his shot hits the wall next to Han.

    Imagine Jar Jar sitting next to Han. Greedo shoots first, blowing Jar Jar's head off. Han shoots second, killing Greedo.

    Everyone wins.

    1. Re:Killing Jar Jar by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      That triggers another thought: Jar Jar playing 3D chess with Chewbacca - and then winning the game!

      That would be a fine scene to add.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:Killing Jar Jar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a lame repost from another weblog. Way to copy-and-paste karma whore.

    3. Re:Killing Jar Jar by hound3000 · · Score: 1

      How about Lucas reverse that the Greedo shooting first change, but keep the Greedo shooting first as an alternate angle on the DVD. That way when he shows his kids, he can just switch angles, and volia! Han is still a saint to them.

      And can we get all 3 different versions on 1 DVD Collectable after this is all said and done? At least on there as deleted scenes... But it shouldn't be hard to just jump around on the disc in order to achieve the effect of the original film, special edition, post pre-trilogy edition... Should it?

  117. Qui-Gonn Jinn by mr100percent · · Score: 2

    Maybe in Episode 6, we could see Qui-Gonn Jinn's ghost next to Yoda, Obi-Wan and Anakin.

    There might be a discrepancy, as I hear in the books that the ghost fades away into the force years later, Qui-Gonn might be too late...

    1. Re:Qui-Gonn Jinn by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "There might be a discrepancy, as I hear in the books that the ghost fades away into the force years later, Qui-Gonn might be too late... "

      Don't put any faith into the books, even if they are 'canon'. Lucas certainly doesn't care about them. According to some people I know (who should go outside more, btw :P), there are loads of inconsistencies if you factor the books in too.

      I wouldn't expect that little detail about 'Force Ghosts' has any bearing on the movie.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Qui-Gonn Jinn by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2
      Maybe in Episode 6, we could see Qui-Gonn Jinn's ghost next to Yoda, Obi-Wan and Anakin.

      More likely, we'll see the actor who played the unmasked Vader replaced by Hayden Christiansen.

      I'm not averse to Lucas making references in 4-6 more concrete by using characters and actors from 1-3. I just don't see how JJB fits in. Maybe if somebody referred to him as "that blankety-blank who sold the Republic up the river". I guess it depends on how he's used in 3. Lucas must be keeping him around for a reason. Why make him a fool in 1 and a political patsy in 2, unless he's either redeemed by his actions or meets a brutal, audience-cathartic end in 3.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:Qui-Gonn Jinn by Kredal · · Score: 2

      Qui-Gon didn't die in front of Luke, though. That's the only way you become a ghost... dying while Luke watches.

      Think about it.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    4. Re:Qui-Gonn Jinn by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      But weren't Anakin and Obi-Wan meeting, shaking hands, showing respect to Yoda or something? Maybe Anakin should be reuniting with Qui-Gonn right then and there too.

  118. Dear god, calm down by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

    The source is Harry Knowles at Aint It Cool News. We already had this debate. Harry has become(literally) a big fat troll who is far more concerned with having his jumbo sized ego stroked by Hollywood than with anything so trite as objectivity or accuracy. He'd happily report that Jar Jar skullfucks Aunt Beru if he thought it'd buy him another ounce of mystique and geek cachet.

    These aren't the spoilers you're looking for. You can go about your business. Move along.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  119. Welcome To Last Week by milkme123 · · Score: 1

    You dumbasses, let's get all mad about OLD NEWS! Oh! Oh! All Your Base Belong to something, I can't remember the line, it's sooo new. http://home.graffiti.net/JLsoft/lastweekJL.jpg

  120. Jar Jar in ep4? Why, God, Why? by hage · · Score: 1

    How is he going to fit Binks into Episode 4? Is it going to be like that scene from Jar Jar's Walking Papers?

    (As Luke and Kenobi approach the spaceport, cut to the cantina interior)

    JAR JAR: "Chewbaccasah, meesa you fatha."

    Chewbacca: "*RRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH*"

  121. Value in "mistakes" by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1
    I was lucky enough to hit Paris once, in the Musee d'Orsay I hit a tour. The painter was named Courbet, and he had this one painting with a bunch of folks attending a funeral. In the background, there was a hazy image of a woman. Some liken her to a ghost, but he wasn't a religious man and doubtful if he believed in ghosts. Rather it was a paintover. He had a figure in the background, didn't like it, so he painted it over. Later, the image begane to show through the paintover, creating a ghost image.


    I found it interesting. It didn't kill the painting, the meaning was still there. But it showed the technique, showed the decisions.


    Sure, Lucas screwed up parts of the story, his talent isn't really in written storytelling. But that's cool, I accept that. And I see value in seeing where the story goes, and the mistakes he made.

  122. About a toy... by Thud457 · · Score: 0

    Regarding the "Jar Jar issue":

    It's pretty obvious that alot of what Georgie boy did in episode I was pandering to the pre teen audience in order to maximize the toy market.

    So how do the sales figures stack up for episode I toys vs the earlier movies for the same range of years since release? Has it paid off? Was it worth it?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:About a toy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's about toys and marketing to pre-teen audiences. It's a damn children's "action/adventure" movie for heavens sake.

      If you're an adult, skip all that hype and go rent "My Dinner With Andre".

  123. Re:C-3P0 and R2-D2 have no memory of Anakin Skywal by Phoenix · · Score: 1

    What of the other people?

    You buy second hand droids all your life and replace them when they hose on you. Unless you developed a relationship with the droids (like Luke Artoo and Threepio) are you really going to remember that the first protocal droid he ever had in his possesion was c3po?

    Or is it more likely that after 20+ years he's going to look at a standard protocal droid (they all look alike after all) and go "Hrmm...I owned one of these once...If it's like the other It should be able to talk to binary evaporators"

    Hell, after 20 years I didn't remember half the people I went to school with at the last reunion.

    --
    -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
  124. Re: Stupid Star Wars nerds - Triumph special (OT) by marcop · · Score: 1

    Speaking of SW nerds... check out the Conan Obrien's guest star Triumph as he investigates SW nerds.

    Go to /humor/movies/triumph/starwars

    My apologies to the webmaster and the server this file is on.

  125. Contest: combined cut of all six episodes by peter303 · · Score: 2

    Now that people can make there "personal edits" on their home PCs (as several did the SW:TPM) using iMovie and the like, its only a matter of time before all six movies are cut together. You could rearange to your hearts content. Some ideas:
    (1) A collage of all the space and land chase scenes.
    (2) A collage of all the light saber battles.
    (3) Put all the character development in temproral order, though you may be hard pressed to assemble more than 15 minutes of this.
    (4) A tour of the star wars planets.
    (5) A tour of the star wars races.
    (6) A documentary on Jedi history.
    (7) A remake of Dune, since Lucas borrowed heavily from Herbert.

  126. Future is Now. And then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of a story here not too long ago about web news stories and such being updated after they were posted. In the future the past will be continually changing. Same as yesterday and today, only more so.

    Perhaps if fair use isn't totally oblviated we will be able to tinker with our own copies of things as well. Image your personalized version of Episode I where, while helping Anakin tune his racer, Jar Jar makes a mistake. And get his head blown completely off, thus silencing him forever.

  127. Sequels to the Phantom Edit... by smackdotcom · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's face it, the moment "Attack of the Clones" hits the video market someone's going to be chopping out the annoying C-3PO "comedy" bits. Any changes that Lucas makes to the originals will find themselves weeded out just as quickly by the die-hard fans. Along those lines, I'd like to be the first to suggest the naming scheme for the impending fan edits:

    Episode I: The Phantom Edit

    Epidose II: Attack of the Edit

    Episode III: TBA

    Episode IV: A New Edit

    Episode V: The Edit Strikes Back

    Episode VI: The Return of the Edit

    And of course Portman is going to end up a glowing ghost beside Anakin, Obi-Wan and the little green dude. Heck, it wouldn't surprise me if Lucas digitally inserts (a suitably make-up aged) Hayden Christensen instead of the guy who's playing Anakin now. Long story short--don't worry about it. The technology is there and the devout Star Wars afficiandos (you know, the guys who make their own vacuum-formed stormtrooper armour?) will have a definitive FAN-tastic version circulating out on the Net before you know it.

    --

    In a world without walls, there is no need for Windows.

    1. Re:Sequels to the Phantom Edit... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't EP3 be TB-Edited?

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:Sequels to the Phantom Edit... by cylcyl · · Score: 1

      Following the trend, shouldn't Episode III be:

      Episode III: To Be Edited?

    3. Re:Sequels to the Phantom Edit... by flikx · · Score: 2

      If only Anakin had drawn a picture of Padme lying naked on a couch, we'd have the family video stores here in Utah editing it. (!)

      --
      One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
  128. George won't do episode VII for sure... by antdude · · Score: 2

    You probably heard this one before. Just to be sure for those who haven't heard it... According to Dark Horizons news (5/29/2002), it said:

    Star Wars: Episode VII: After recent speculation based on what sounded like a misinterpreted quote, George Lucas has finally and clearly ruled out further adventures after 'Jedi'. Lucas told Infobeat that he had PREVIOUSLY CONSIDERED the idea but has since canned it totally - "I thought it might be fun to bring Carrie (Fisher) and Mark (Hammill) and Harrison (Ford) back when they're 65 and make another movie with them. But I'm going to be over 60 when I finish this and it takes 10 years to do a trilogy. I'm not going to spend my last 10 years doing Star Wars".

    I am fine with the six movies. :)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  129. This is like by cardshark2001 · · Score: 1

    A long lost relative that you have never heard of shows up. Your family gets to know him and everyone hates him, but you like him so much that you decide to airbrush him into all of your 35mm family reunion footage. You, being the official family archivist.

    If I was in that family, I'd change my name.

    --
    WWJD? JWRTFA!
  130. I'm still trying to figure out.... by jgdobak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...What makes Natalie Portman so "hot."

    She's not, IMHO, as gorgeous as everyone makes her out to be. She has "Girl next door" appeal. That's about it. They ruined that by making her wear gratuitously and pointlessly slutty outfits in the film, instead of adding something to the feel of the movie by dressing her as the dignitary she supposedly is.

    Besides, being attractive doesn't make up for being terrible at acting. Her performance in Episode 2 was wooden, at best.

    1. Re:I'm still trying to figure out.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even read the post? It said she WASN'T hot.

    2. Re:I'm still trying to figure out.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Her performance wasn't the only thing that was wooden. Ha ha ha.

      -bugg

    3. Re:I'm still trying to figure out.... by T3KL3R · · Score: 1

      Considering how many outfits she wears throughout Ep I & II, I really don't think a large percentage of them would be considered "slutty". Most of them are huge gawdy contraptions that almost hide her completely.

      Natalie's acting has been terrible in these two films but I would have to blame the director and writer rather than the actress. She's been recognized for her skills in the past, but I doubt you'll find anyone who praised her before being able to praise her for SW roles. It's pretty hard to be a good actress/actor when the script is crap and the director sticks you in front of a blue screen and then only pays attention to what it will take to perform his feats of FX.

  131. SCENE: Alderaan... by MagikSlinger · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jar-Jar and Bail Organa looking up at the ominous new star in the heavens.

    Jar-Jar: "Issa thata new moona, Bail Organa?"

    CUT TO Death Star interior as the Planet Pulverizer(TM) fires and hits Alderaan.

    CUT TO Jar-Jar binks being hidiously vaporized on Alderaan in a cruel twist of fate for giving the empire its power.

    So you see, people, it might not be that bad...

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    1. Re:SCENE: Alderaan... by Twister002 · · Score: 1

      Jimmy Smits, who played Bail Organa in AOTC even though they never SAY his name during the movie (another annoying Star Wars thing, bit actors that have names but are never named in the movie just during the credits) that he and Lucas had talked about putting him in A New Hope, dunno if he was joking or not.

      --
      "For a successful technology, honesty must take precedence over public relations for nature cannot be fooled." -Feynman
  132. Not again... by surfcow · · Score: 2

    I guess we'll all have to run out and buy "Star Wars: A New Hope, Extra-Special Edition, Director's Cut". How many versions of the film are there now?

    Something's getting inserted somewhere all right.

    =brian

  133. While he's at it -- Whummmp-Whummp by El_Che · · Score: 1

    Lucas should update all the Light-sabre duels, too. As it stands, the Jedi apparently lose their elite close-combat skills over time (e.g. Ben Kenobi & Anakin's sabre-play in E2: AOTC versus Ben Kenobi's and Darth's duel in E4: ANH -- whummmp .... whummmmp... whump-screesh.... whummmmp.)

    1. Re:While he's at it -- Whummmp-Whummp by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Actually, if you read up on kendo, which is what the lightsaber styles of the first three movies are based on, you'll see that Kenobi's skills have improved to the point that he realizes that jumping around and swinging is useless. He's 'fighting for center.' But some of his brash recklessness shows through with the spin cuts. Watch him in TPM, and you'll see a poor fighter. "Hey, I've got an idea, I'll adopt a guard stance that involves holding a glowing rod right in front of my eyes!"

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:While he's at it -- Whummmp-Whummp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other argument to be made is that Obi Wan is OLD and doesn't have the l33t saber skillz anymore in A New Hope. And since we know that force power comes from midichlorians, and Vader is mostly machine and therefore lacking said midichlorians he wouldn't have the top-notch lightsaber skills anymore either.

    3. Re:While he's at it -- Whummmp-Whummp by El_Che · · Score: 1
      The other argument to be made is that Obi Wan is OLD

      So the Yoda of E2:AOTC is YOUNG?

      Vader is mostly machine and therefore lacking said midichlorians he wouldn't have the top-notch lightsaber skills anymore either.

      What about the rest of his Jedi powers? did they fade with the advent of machinery? Darth Vader looks to have much more command of the force than young Anakin (choking the Imperial Officer from afar in ANH, teleporting inanimate objects at Luke in TESB, etc...)

    4. Re:While he's at it -- Whummmp-Whummp by El_Che · · Score: 1
      Actually, if you read up on kendo, which is what the lightsaber styles of the first three movies are based on, you'll see that Kenobi's skills have improved to the point that he realizes that jumping around and swinging is useless.

      I don't know shit about Kendo, and I'm betting Lucas' mythology doesn't either, unless you're suggesting Kenobi has more mastery of Jedi lightsabre skills midway through ANH than Yoda himself does at the end of AOTC.

    5. Re:While he's at it -- Whummmp-Whummp by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Actually, I'm suggesting just that. I was deeply disturbed by the lack of using the force to do ANYTHING in TPM and ATOC. I think that in Episode 3, you'll see Kenobi finally defeat Dooku.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  134. Babelfish translation by kidyomo · · Score: 0

    Whore of bloody hell!

    --

    - posts may be recorded for legal or training purposes. Thank you for your co-operation.
  135. Interesting copyright ramifications... by sterno · · Score: 2

    Here folks is a big argument for shorter term copyrights. George Lucas can now go back and alter the original Start Wars to include a major nude scene with Jar Jar, and then cease distribution of the older untouched edition. Eventually that original version will cease to be with no efforts to maintain it and archive it properly.

    If copyright was for a shorter period, the original star wars could be restored from existing copies and maintained. As it is now, large pieces of our cultural history can be easily left to decay on the cutting room floor because of the whims of the copyright owner, who in many cases is no longer the person that actually produced the work.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  136. There will be no 3rd trilogy by gaudior · · Score: 2

    That was never in the plans, even back in the seventies. Ain't gonna happen.

    1. Re:There will be no 3rd trilogy by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      I had a book, back in the day, which was about The Making of ESB, specifically the models, and there was an interview with GL in there which had him saying there would be 9 films, that the droids linked them together, that the middle 3 were made first because they had the most action in and were more "accessible" etc.

      Or did I dream it ?

      graspee

    2. Re:There will be no 3rd trilogy by gaudior · · Score: 2

      Ya know, I seem to remeber something like that, also. I don't think he ever actually scripted the whole story, as has been claimed. I'd be VERY surprised if the franchise survives episode 3, and the revisionism of 4 - 6. I suspect an acceleration of the weariness with the whole thing that many of us feel.

  137. insert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'd like to "insert" jar jar binks into a wood chipper.

    Then "insert" my tool into natalie.

  138. Lucas by beleg777 · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine pointed out something I thought was really funny. George started out in the role of Luke Skywalker, a small rebel fighting a giant. He's now become the emperor, a greedy old man telling everyone else that what he wants is what everyone should do. I think the thing that made the origionals so good was that it was Lucas and a bunch of friends and equals working on a movie. Now it's Lucas and a bunch of people who he can fire if he doesn't like what they think.

    --

    Science may someday discover what faith has always known.
  139. The tighter you squeeze the franchise. . . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 3, Funny
    . . . the more fans will slip thorugh your fingers.

    Now, all we need is a CGI Peter Cushing with a CGI Lucas beard and flannel shirt. . . .

  140. Re:You are a sheep. Baa! Baa! by Anomolous+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

    What in the world are you talking about? Do your nurses realize you're out of your cell again?

    --

    "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." - George Bush
  141. Happy Life Day!!! by Anus+Bird+Girl · · Score: 1

    It's Christmas/Kwanzaa/Hannukah 2002!

    Uncle George has a special treat for us! A new Star Wars Christmas Special!

    We get to visit Jar Jar's family and watch his wife cook and his father whack off to Gungan pr0n. There's a musical number by N'Stynk, an animated short featuring Fett pere et fils, and Bea Arthur reprises her role as the cantina owner.

    Happy Life Day!!! Actiof figures for everyone!!!

    (!)

  142. Having screwed up the prequels... by druzicka · · Score: 1
    now Lucas is going to f*ck with the original trilogy? LEAVE IT ALONE! Special Edition was bad enough... That whole scene with Jabba in the Mos Eisley hanger looked like sh*t.

    --
    If Happy Fun Ball begins to smoke, get away immediately. Seek shelter and cover head.
  143. New Distro's of Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Lucas is going to open-source the whole darned thing. I reckon the Gentoo Distro will probably have less crap in it than some of the others.

    I reckon Lucas is probably lindows....

    Team

  144. Fixing Episode 2 by Animats · · Score: 2
    Episode 2 could be much improved with one simple change.

    • When Yoda enters the cave to deal with Dooku, Yoda just pulls out a blaster and shoots him.
  145. Special Effects by Krieger · · Score: 2

    Hell the "special effects" from the first three (IV, V and VI) are much better then the tripe that he's churning out now. Models make a much more real and gritty world, then the shiny silver spaceships he's using now. You don't suffer from the it's too clean to be in the picture obnoxious effect that CGI tends to have. That and models (the Rancor) tend to move correctly or at least better then computer models.

    1. Re:Special Effects by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      I haven't seen I or II yet (and probably won't), but I saw a snippet of the Yoda fight scene on the news last night. As soon as I saw that little man get angry and jump around and just immediately started laughing my ass off, and I don't believe that scene was intended to be comedy.

    2. Re:Special Effects by r_barchetta · · Score: 1


      Gotta agree with this. One only has to watch 2001 to see how realistic models and camera tricks can appeaer to the viewer. And that came out, what, 9 years before ep. IV?

      CGI can be useful here and there but just try to imagine what Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon would have looked like if they had not used ropes and pulleys with people (instead of machines) operating them.

      Short version: when stuff isn't really there it's a lot easier to tell that it's not. When stuff is really there, it's really there.

      -r

      --
      Just because something is free does not mean you have to take it.
    3. Re:Special Effects by sparrow_hawk · · Score: 1

      Just saw II last night and loved it (IMHO better than *Spider-man*...) -- especially the cyberpunkish chase scene through Coruscant. That said, I have to agree that the physical models age better than the CG.

      I had a chance to see Ep. I again recently on TV, and to be frank, the pod-racing scene looked fake. Airbrushed smudges for "smoke", ships exploding into their component polygons, etc. etc. It didn't look bad when it was first released, but the technology has advanced to the point where the old is almost painful to watch. I also saw ANH, and the models still look really good.

      On the other hand, there is no way Episode II could have been made the way it was without the CG, and you can't avoid tying a movie to when it was made (changing hairstyles, anyone?). I had a hard time last night telling the CG/matte-painted backdrops from the real deal (esp. on Naboo and Tatooine), which is definately progress, and I enjoy the swooping, roller-coaster camera work that CG allows.

      I worry some about Mr. Lucas's devotion to digital film as well -- there is something about digital that is different from standard film, some characteristic I can't pinpoint, that may not transfer as well. (Or maybe I was hallucinating. Who knows. :-) Hopefully if he is including Natalie Portman in RotJ, he'll do it with minimal CG and on standard film so it won't be so jarring.

    4. Re:Special Effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DOUGLAS TRUMBULL ROCKS!!! Ehrm... sorry. Had to get that out of my system. Off-topic too, I know. ;-)

    5. Re:Special Effects by rkent · · Score: 1

      Man, everyone in the theater laughed when that started. And it's pretty much the best part of the movie, so don't bother going at this point.

    6. Re:Special Effects by CConkle · · Score: 1

      I must disagree. It's quite obvious, if you see the movie--which you should, instead of bitching on /.--that that scene, while not necessarily intended to be silly, is supposed to be laughed at. The whole "Yoda is a badass Muppet" thing is really cool. In general, I was impressed with audience-interaction properties of AOTC. No uneasy, inappropriate laughter like in FotR, or the various other crimes audiences commit. The movie was a lot of fun to watch--not literary, mind you, but pretty (I'm a card-carrying chrome sucker) and lots of fun, with a few exceptions. (I appreciate the tragedy and love stories a lot more than most people, for reasons X, Y, and Z.)

  146. well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not really. He was presumably inovlved with ILM, which is really his forte. And he concieved several projects that he went on to produce. Like Indiana Jones, Willow, and oh so great Howard the Duck.

    He does have vision, he just doesn't have the skill to back it up. And once upon a time, he had te presence of mind to have others work on his "vision".

    1. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Howard the Duck kicks all sorta Jedi ass!!!! Howard RuL3ZZ and Luke is his bitch!

  147. Different versions on DVD? by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't know if George Lucas would want to do this, but what if the DVD had all three versions (or at least the original and the newest with both sets of new stuff)? That way, our beloved original is not lost, but there's some fun added stuff.

    Would there be any harm in doing this?

    mark

    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Different versions on DVD? by regen · · Score: 2

      It would probably work for Lucas as well since he could charge 3x as much.

    2. Re:Different versions on DVD? by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Would there be any harm in doing this?

      You mean aside from the Slashdot article that will be posted slamming George Lucas for being so greedy as to "make us buy all three DVD sets."

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    3. Re:Different versions on DVD? by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2

      Oh... well I was thinking more along the lines of it being in the same DVD. There would just be certain places where the two movies were different, and DVDs are capable of diverging in that way.

      The gut feeling I had about this idea is that George wouldn't allow it. It seems like he wouldn't want to imply that any of his additions didn't improve on the original, because of his ego. Like, "why do you want to watch the original when I made it better?"

      Hard to say.

      mark

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    4. Re:Different versions on DVD? by xTown · · Score: 1
      The gut feeling I had about this idea is that George wouldn't allow it


      I think you're right. I can't back this up or anything, but I think I remember the official "party line" being that the Special Edition releases were official--meaning that the real movies no longer apply. Kind of like in "1984".


      Personally, I think that people can take "the director's vision" and shove it. I don't want what he envisioned, I want what he was able to do with what he had. And that includes Han firing first. But you're exactly right: "Why do you want to watch the original when I made it better" is exactly what Lucas is thinking.

    5. Re:Different versions on DVD? by bitweever · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ...what if the DVD had all three versions...

      Not gonna happen.

      This is from theforce.net:
      Not sure if you have seen this yet, but in the new issue of Star Wars Insider, George Lucas doubts he will include the original theatrical versions of the 1977-1983 trilogy on DVD. He says that, for him, the special editions are the finished versions. And Bryan Wahrer of Alderaan Online follows up with this exact quote:
      'Asked if there's a possibility of including the original versions as alternate tracks, to show the evolution of the films, showcase the state-of-the-art of the era, and preserve film history, Lucas said simply, "I don't think so. I think of the film as The Special Edition. I don't think of it as the early version, any more than I would put early rough cuts on.... I consider The Special Edition as being the final version at this point. I don't even worry about the other ones, because it went through a lot of incarnations to get to the final stage."'

    6. Re:Different versions on DVD? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 4, Funny
      Would there be any harm in doing this?

      Yes. To George's ego.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    7. Re:Different versions on DVD? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      10 ego==pocketbook
      20 GOTO BANK

    8. Re:Different versions on DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Dephex Twin explains, there's a reason you're on my "enemy" list. You just don't think things out very well. Occasionally you're funny. Generally you're too serious.

  148. I'm shocked... by afabbro · · Score: 1

    ...you mean George didn't write out treatments/story outlines for all nine episodes before deciding to film 4, 5, and 6? You mean he's been making stuff up as he goes along? Gosh, I just can't believe it.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  149. SW his only good success? by Mordaximus · · Score: 1

    I rather liked Willow personally. And Twice upon a Time. And Raiders of the lost Ark. Should I go on...

    1. Re:SW his only good success? by dnorman · · Score: 1

      Yeah. And don't forget Howard the Duck.

      --


      It is pitch dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    2. Re:SW his only good success? by BlaKnail · · Score: 1

      Well, seeing as how Willow was directed by Ron Howard, and Raiders by Spielburg we can say that Lucas can have good ideas, but his ability to put them on film is better left to others...

      That's why Empire is considered the best SW movie.

    3. Re:SW his only good success? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Willow sucked ass. Nasty, filthy, hairy, pimpley, unwiped ass. It was godawful in every way. Howard the Duck, as bad as it was, was better than Willow.

  150. if and only if... by mblase · · Score: 2

    I can tolerate this on the condition that Lucas allows viewers to see the DVD in one of two ways: the original, unadulterated version and the "special/flashback" edition. As long as I have a choice about skipping the retconned scenes, I'll not complain.

    1. Re:if and only if... by GPPL · · Score: 1

      come on! can you stand about ten seconds of new footage? it's not like they are showing a picture of the goatse.cx guy

      --


      Your mother implements multi-vendor protocols without synergy
  151. Changing history by praedor · · Score: 2

    Portman? OK, instead of inserting her into old movies, how about inserting her into my home? What a frickin' hottie.


    I don't see how it can be done. The first movies were futurama, presumably when Portmans character would be well aged...unless there is to be some sort of flashback stuff or goofy "the force" ghost stuff with a hot young Portman spook (ala the dead Obi-Wan and recently deceased Darth).


    As for Jar-Jar. If this thing makes it into anything else Star Warzy, then it will be due to Lucas demonstrating a true loss of touch with reality. I'd say this would prove beyond doubt that his creativity ended with the first trilogy and Alzhiemer's or presenile dementia has kicked in.


    Jar-Jar is the pinnacle of nasti-stupid characters created by Lucas. The other members of the STUPID-Ass, childish (OVERLY childish) characters would be the ridiculous Ewoks and then a just-out-of-diapers Anakin in Episode 1. Talk about foresaking real people that are past wearing poopie diapers and pandering to the Romper Room crowd.


    Hey Lucas, quite aiming at the Goo-goo-gaa-gaa set and aim HIGHER. Go no lower than the mid-teens (but skip the teen-beloved farting and barfing humor).


    Infants are not a worthy market but that seems to be all you shoot for - of course, they are the easiest to please and require the least amount of talent to amuse...


    --
    In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    1. Re:Changing history by happyclam · · Score: 2
      Infants are ... all you shoot for - of course, they are the easiest to please and require the least amount of talent to amuse.

      ...and have the longest expected life span and therefore the greatest lifetime customer value. And the most likely to whine incessantly so grandma buys the new action figure and plastic light saber flashlight.

      Speaking of incessant whining... let me get back to reading the other posts.

      --
      He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
  152. at last! by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

    Somebody had to say it. I feel the exact same way.... if the new stuff sucks, I'll ignore it. If it doesn't, I'll enjoy it. How can I lose?

    God knows there's a lot of films that would be well served with minor tweaking. Somebody comes along with the resources and the inclination to redo some pieces of his past work, and suddenly everyone's crying for his blood! Why?

    1. Re:at last! by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 2

      I would feel the same way if I had the *choice* to get the original versions on dvd. I doubt that is what will happen though, as I don't think you can even get the orginal vhs versions anymore.

  153. Some of us don't own VCRs by Steveftoth · · Score: 2

    I don't plan on getting one. My dvd player is way better, except that it won't play the old star wars videos (since they are on VHS). I guess that the responce to that is well, "buy a VCR you looser", but I don't want to so I guess I'll just have to deal with the new version on DVD, if I decide to buy it at all since I liked the original more then any of the newer versions. The new special edition wasn't that much better, and who knows about the as yet unreleased version. I'm not HC enough of a fan to get upset about this, but it would be nice if Lucas decided to stop changing things.
    If he really thinks that the movie should be changed, maybe he should just redo it then. It's not like it would be that expensive to redo, just time consuming.
    He believes in digital actors, just get the guys who did FF the movie to redo it with the original cast looking like they did 25 years ago. They are all still alive so they could redo the voices if lucas wanted to record a new soundtrack as well. (Or just reuse the old one... hehehe) But I digress.

  154. nope by grung0r · · Score: 1

    I do belive you are indeed wrong.The title crawl begins with the the text 'Epsidoe IV - A New Hope". I can't testify to it being there in '77 however, as I was 4 years away from being born, but I've heard people talk about it being there in the origianl theatrical relase, and all the tapes made before george lucas went on his "special edition" craze also contain it. That and it's just common knowledge.

  155. NP insert not a big deal. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Portman will probably just be stuck in as a 'ghost' at the end of ep4: return of the jedi, along with Aninken, Obiwan, and Yoda. Its probably not going to be a big deal.

    Otoh... puttting Jar jar in ANH? That just seems like a slap in the face...

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:NP insert not a big deal. by org.earth.Citizen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I suspected that Darth Vader would kill Jar Jar in Ep.III, but Lucas probably backed off that idea after considering the audience reaction would mostly likely be laughter and applause rather than shock and horror.

  156. Re:Future is Now. And then. by medcalf · · Score: 2

    Ah, but will it be possible for me to edit years 21 and 22 out of my life retroactively?

    -jeff

    --
    -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
  157. That does not follow by mblase · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Many (not all) of us *do* want general freedom to modify the original films in this manner.

    We also want to have the choice of retaining the film in its original presentation.

    Lucas seems bent on changing the "Star Wars" movies a bit more with every major release so that the only way to get the original films may one day be to buy the VHS copies on eBay somewhere.

    Pfah to that. Not *everyone* wants to see the films "enhanced" with new footage, and I'd like to have the choice of not seeing it when I watch the film.

  158. Original, unedited sequels on DVD by skirch · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have been wondering lately if the original, unmodified versions of the sequels will be released on DVD. After reading reports like this one, it makes me very doubtful, and it makes me more disappointed in Lucas. There's something sacred about Star Wars, and he's been ruining it for a lot of us for the last 10 years. He needs to get over it and just move on with his life. Star Wars is what it is, and no matter how many fart jokes or computer-generated Jabbas you work into the old trilogy, it's still the same story. The constant tweaking to get "what he wanted to do originally but lacked the technology" (and in this case, the actress) doesn't add anything. The new stuff is just distracting. It upsets my stomach and makes me cringe.

    My brother was really into collecting movies before the advent of DVD, and somewhere along the line he grabbed laserdisc copies of The Star Wars trilogy. It's an awesome set, not the special edition. Not upgraded. If the non-special-edition movies aren't released on DVD, I'm really tempted to make a DVD copy of this set for my own use.

    Would it be legal since I already own the trilogy on VHS? Would it be legal for me to make a copy for a friend that owns the trilogy on VHS?

  159. Jedi Twins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And in other news, rumor has it that in episodes 7-9, the Jedi twins will be played by Mary-Kate and Ashley.

  160. From the get-a-clue dept. by bgarcia · · Score: 2
    from the historical-revisionism-stinks dept.
    Uh.... Chris?

    Hate to break it to you pal, but this whole Star Wars story...

    It's ___FICTION___!!!!!!!

    It didn't really happen long, long ago in a galaxy far, far away...

    --
    I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  161. Just like colorizing... by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

    This is the same mentality that insists that old black & white movies MUST be turned into pastel color movies before being rereleased.

    Why the hell doesn't Lucas just accept that the original Star Wars is going to be his best-remembered film and stop meddling with it. I don't remember hearing anyone whine about how Han Solo was a "meanie", or any petitions going around to change that scene.

    Yeah, ok, maybe he "messed up", but it's on film, and guess what? People like it. Sometimes the best things are unintended screwups that nonetheless become popular and well loved. Don't second guess yourself, don't ask why.. just accept and learn.

    I think it's pretty clear that George got lucky with the first Star Wars. Every film thereafter has leaned more and more towards some specific marketing demographic, and has had obvious storyline sacrifices to satisfy those demands. I understand doing that when you're new on the scene and have to pay the bills.. but c'mon! George Lucas needs more money about like a 90-degree summer day near a swamp needs more mosquitoes. He can afford to tell the story for its own sake, yet he clearly bows to what the marketers tell him. I hope he enjoyed his sucess, as it's all downhill from here...

  162. STAR WARS.NET by org.earth.Citizen · · Score: 2, Funny

    If Lucas is really out to tie up every loose end, then Star Wars will literally be a work in progress forever. To these ends, maybe Lucas should model Star Wars on .NET. You could buy a Star Wars subscription and every quarter you will be sent a SWAN (Star Wars addict Network) DVD pack, consisting of all 6 episodes with the latest patches and service packs applied, which fix plot and continuity errors. The first service pack will address why in the 10 years between TPM and AOTC, the Jedi/republic/Naboo did not buy Anakin's mom's freedom, especially after he saved Naboo.

  163. makes perfect sense, by borat · · Score: 1

    When the first movie was made, Lucas already had a rough idea of the full story, however at that time it wasn't possible to put Jar Jar or Natalie Portman in the movie (i don't think she was even born yet.) Special effects at the time just simply couldn't make it happen. But now the technology is there to put Jar Jar in, and Natalie Portman can go ahead and play her own part since she exists now. Just wait 20 or so more years, I hear Mr. Lucas has some pretty big surprises for episodes 1-3 in the works, but he won't be 100% sure what they are until he starts filming the back story to the first 3 films.

  164. BK edition by e2d2 · · Score: 1

    In Brooklyn it's gonna be known as Star Wars Plus Plus Too, stuffed between a Kansas Fried Chicken and a White Castle, sold in a bundle of 3 for $10, and they'll throw in a free frilly bow/car freshner.

  165. Chewbacca by berniecase · · Score: 1

    If Padme gets turned into Chewbacca in a freak accident, I think my impression of the Star Wars series will change dramatically.... for the better.

  166. He's not evil, just incredibly greedy... by fizzychicken · · Score: 1
    And everyone who keeps on coming back for more is just gullible. Don't get me wrong, the Star Wars and Indiana Jones sagas are incredibly compelling films - I whooped for joy when I heard that the Indy trilogy will be available on DVD soon - but he really is remorselessly manipulative when it comes to money-making.

    I bought the Star Wars trilogy when it came out on VHS about 8 years ago, and just after I had bought the vids, what happens but the special editions come out - ready for me to pay for the same films yet again. This was the point I stopped being a chump, and stopped buying Star Wars stuff.

    The only thing that is more predictable than Lucas's relentless re-hashing money making antics is the gullibility of the people who keep buying the same films over and over and over again.

    But, hey, if that's what you want to do with your money, that's fine - it's your cash. Personally, I'd rather spend it on the EFF, the latest Linux distro (yes I actually pay for and support Linux!), or a good Chomsky book. 8)

    Well, and my new Powerbook of course 8))....

    --
    'Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves.' - George Gordon
  167. Copyrights != trademarks by yerricde · · Score: 1

    eliminate copyrights so ANYONE can make changes like this on a whim?

    If you worry about the lack of artistic integrity that some think would result from a loosening of the law covering derivative works, don't. That's what trademark law is for. George Lucas controls the Lucasfilm® trademark, and in a world with loose derivative work laws but strong trademark laws, those wishing to find what's canonical can simply "look for the logo."

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  168. Nancy Drew by Eryq · · Score: 2

    I am told that the "Nancy Drew" books are (or once were) constantly being revised and updated to appeal to the current generation of readers.

    For example, some of the earlier ones were supposedly downright offensive to modern sensibilities w.r.t. how African American characters were treated (think pre-WWII movies and use your imagination).

    I'm not saying that this is right, or a good idea. Just that Lucas wouldn't be the first.

    --
    I'm a bloodsucking fiend! Look at my outfit!
  169. Original Trilogy? by Reverend+Raven · · Score: 1

    The complaints and demands for George Lucas to release the "original" (defined as the Non-Special Edition cuts) trilogy on DVD, as it was originally presented in the theatres...

    I'm a film student, and I've read and understand why Mr. Lucas won't do that. He doesn't consider the "original" versions of the films to be the completed versions. They are work prints, demo copies (as it were) to Lucas. Asking him for the "original" cuts of the films is like asking for a work print...That's not the way he wants people to see them so he's not going to release *his* films in any way but the way he wants. That's why there really isn't a Special Edition...there's only the original Trilogy (the "original" versions are like unsupported betas....use at your own risk).

    And as a film student I can respect that. I certainly wouldn't want people seeing a subpar cut of my films..especially if it was something as popular as Star Wars. However, I wouldn't have updated the special effects because that detracts from the original effects and effects artists...but that's another plate of worms. But they are Lucas' films...he can and will do whatever it is he feels is right..and people will either buy them (the vast majority), or complain about this CG character or that effect or whatever.

    Special note, I did not like the original trilogy a whole lot..but I adored Episodes I and II. I don't see why people hate Jar Jar so much..it's not like he was vital to the plot or detracted so much from the film. But hey, if you don't like it go watch the Phantom Edit or the original trilogy another six times. ;) To each their own, I guess.

    --

    --Reverend Raven
    Desperate days demand dire deeds.
    1. Re:Original Trilogy? by Backov · · Score: 1

      Your argument falls apart when you take into consideration that all of the Holy Trinity were released on VHS, at least 2 times.

      He's delaying release for the big cash in, I think that's quite clear. ;>

      Cheers,
      Backov

      --
      In the law there is no overlap between theft and copyright infringement whatsoever.
    2. Re:Original Trilogy? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Ah, but he DID release the original version! It's not an unsupported beta, it's version 1.0! And version 2.0 sux! Special note: I also liked EP1 for the most part (Jar-Jar still sux). EP2 was ok (Jar-Jar still sux, but Palpatine luvs him).

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:Original Trilogy? by xTown · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but...
      1. They ARE completed versions. Completed and released. They weren't considered subpar then. Asking for the original cuts of the films is not like asking for a work print. It's asking for a film to be available as it was released in its completed form.
      2. As a film student, aren't you in the least bit interested in what he COULD do on film, rather than what he WANTED to do? The other "plate of worms" is the important one. A lot of film history deals with filmmakers pushing the envelope as far as what's available to them at the time their films are made.

      What if Billy Wilder had made a Special Edition of "Some Like It Hot" because "there weren't enough girls in the band, but now with computer technology, we can show the band as originally intended"?

      What if someone went back to the original 1933 King Kong and replaced the stop-motion Kong with a CG Kong? We'd consider that a tragedy, wouldn't we?

    4. Re:Original Trilogy? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Absolutely. Lucas is wrong. I have the original VHS 'uncorrected' releases of IV-V-VI and they define a cinematic language that is what made Lucas his money and got him his fame.

      Lucas wanted 'Phantom Menace' scale from the beginning, but he couldn't have it. From space battles to interiors, his budget spelled out constraints on sets, on effects: Mos Eisley spaceport was like 20 feet of wall, Cloud City was several lengths of corridor, in-fighter reaction shots were restricted to extreme close-ups with little or no external views visible: the budget and the technology was hugely restrictive.

      Through this limitation, Lucas produced BIG, CLEAR images that 'read' instantly, delivered the relevant story points without a single wasted visual element, and MOVED... both in the sense of a violent through-frame motion, and in terms of not lingering for a single wasted second over the effect as effect, but slamming past it to the next scene for a sense of headlong motion in terms of sheer film.

      And all the time, he only wanted to make 'Ben Hur' with droids- pull the camera back, linger and ogle the worlds of his fantasy.

      Well, now he can. And it sucks. And I'm taking good care of my old VHS tapes and pray they don't come to harm- because THAT was what made Lucas's legend. It's not what he wanted- that's boring. Cast of thousands, millions of worlds, billions of extras is boring. The synergy between this desire and the constraints of reality produced incredibly vivid, up-front, aggressive film, all because Lucas constantly wanted to cover up his failure to truly accomplish what HE wanted to see.

      I hope there are 70mm (even 35mm) prints out there of the original films, being stored safely, because Lucas is the worst possible saboteur of his own filmed legacy- not through selling out, but through trying to realize the actually-boring ambitions he'd had from the start.

    5. Re:Original Trilogy? by Reverend+Raven · · Score: 1

      1: They are not completed...not to George Lucas. And until he says they're completed, they are not completed. Total control, and all.

      2:I agree. That's why I don't agree with Lucas's decision to tinker with the original trilogy, but it is his trilogy to tinker with and if that's what he feels properly represents his films and his vision, more power to him. I think it will be damaging to film history, as future generations won't be able to see the cutting edge special effects of the late 70s/early 80s, but the standard technological achievements of the late 90s. But again, if this is what Lucas wants to do, as the sole creative controller...he has that right.

      --

      --Reverend Raven
      Desperate days demand dire deeds.
  170. Not about copyright. by BlueFrog · · Score: 2, Informative
    There's a huge difference between supporting the public's rights to fair use, and wanting to emliminate copyright altogether. The current debate over copyright law centers on various partys' efforts to expand their rightful control over duplication to exert unrightful control over access.

    So, to bring us back to the topic at hand: I support Lucas' right to do whatevery he wants with his own movies. But in the case of the Holy Trilogy, I wish he'd refrain, and leave them just as they are. (Or give us the option to view the old versions.)

  171. Phantom edits and re-releases by dachshund · · Score: 1

    I imagine that the original films will regain their popularity someday, at least in some circles. Then Lucas (or his estate) will make even more money by re-releasing them all on DVD in the unmodified (but refurbished) version. But until that day, I wonder how much work it'd take to edit out all of the new crap on the modified DVDs when they come out? Perhaps you'll be able to download a mostly-original refurbished Star Wars someday soon.

  172. And destroying the original by yerricde · · Score: 1

    you don't have to buy it

    Many fans want Star Wars Episode 4-6 version 1.0 (where Greedo didn't shoot first). That will never be available on DVD. By the time Episode III is released, Lucas will have pulled everything that's not 3.0 (i.e. Binks and Portman CG'd where fans feel they don't belong) from the shelves.

    If you "want to make changes" you have to accept other people's rights (especially the original author/artist/etc!) to do the same!

    Making changes != making changes and destroying the original.

    Yes, I have the original trilogy on vhs.

    Now watch tapes of the original version of the trilogy shoot up to $200 on eBay.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:And destroying the original by ParticleGirl · · Score: 2

      Now watch tapes of the original version of the trilogy shoot up to $200 on eBay.

      That's the point-- I don't have to. I own them. I saw them, I wanted them, I got them, and now I don't need to worry about changes. I hear a random song I like on the radio, I get a copy before the remix is the only version available or the band fades from view.

      Those people who wanted the original version and always assumed they'd have it available to them are the ones that are at fault here. Not Lucas, who has every right to release whatever version he'd like, or not disseminate something that he has a copyright to. Someday the copyright is supposed to end and this will all be public domain, and then it will be freely available. Until then, if you want indefinite access to something that could potentially be altered, it's your own responsibility to go ensure that you'll have it.

      Maybe that means either buying a copy of something you enjoy and will want to see/hear/experience in the future, or buying a VCR and taping it from tv.

      --
      Do something about world hunger. Click here
  173. Re:C-3P0 and R2-D2 have no memory of Anakin Skywal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    >Hell, after 20 years I didn't remember half the people I went to school with at the last reunion

    Dude. You need to lay off the weed. It's making you stupid.

  174. I'm surprised and yet I am not by Programmer_In_Traini · · Score: 1

    This news only half surprises me.

    I was actually thinking Lucas would have completely remade Episode IV - VI just to make them more visually enjoyable (even though the original ones are excellent)

    So now, well, according to rumors, he will be re-creating episodes IV - VI but with some changes to the plot as well.

    It was to be expected IMO, Star Wars is Lucas's baby, he just can't let go of it or say : My job is done here.

    no, he will want to tune it again and again.

    LOL, for all we now we'll end up and a serie of pre-star wars series (Episode 0 ??) where we'll be able to see how yoda got all those magic fingers.

    Just a thought anyway

    --
    If you look like your passport photo, you're too ill to travel. - Will Kommen
    1. Re:I'm surprised and yet I am not by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      > a serie of pre-star wars series (Episode 0 ??) where we'll be able to see how yoda got all those magic fingers
      No, but we did see Han Solo drag racing a '55 Chevvy.... (American Graffiti)

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  175. Maybe the DVD will have 3 modes... by bberg · · Score: 1

    One for original, one for special edition, and one for "star wars - xp" (as someone else called it). Its doubtful sense the special edition is a remastered version (thus not allowing them to share scenes). but it sure would be nice "DVD" touch if they could work something like this out.

  176. c3po by Sabalon · · Score: 2

    Somewhere at home I have the original star wars novel, as written by George Lucas, and in there somewhere I swear that 3po mentions that he used to belong to Darth Vader.

    I remember when I read it going "huh???" but now it all makes sense - except the memory erasure.

  177. Re:I'm still trying to fi.... Folgers Crystal Meth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean that Queen Armadillo WASN'T supposed to be played like she was on a perpetual opium high?

    Oh, and the outfits were adapted from eastern culture ceremonial garb.

    This poster's name secretly replaced with Folgers Crystal Meth

  178. The original article . . . by Ineffable+27 · · Score: 1

    Here's the original article from Coming Soon that Harry Knowles referred to. The Sci-Fi site should have credited Coming Soon instead of Knowles, since Knowles added nothing, just cited the article.

    --
    "He'd be a broader guy if he had dropped acid once." - Steve Jobs on Bill Gates
  179. One last jab at Lucas to make my point: by Thud457 · · Score: 0

    Note that at least one third of Lucas' oeuvre is CRAP.

    And that doesn't even include the indescribable horror of the "Star Wars Christmas Special"!
    "The Ewok Adventure" my ASS!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  180. I would love to... by WetCat · · Score: 1

    see Anakin Skywalker becoming Luke Skywalker!
    Let Dart Wader say GRRR!!!! And let him explain his existence!

  181. Rumors Source by shawnmelliott · · Score: 2

    After much searching on the internet.... 50 links and various popup ads I have found the source of the Rumor. it's....... Jon Katz

    Anybody whose read his last couple of articles ( hey, just being subjective here ) would agree there's definite motive for this kind of rumor.

  182. Lucas is a flamin genius by Horne-fisher · · Score: 1

    Did you ever think that lucas might have had some motivation for making JJB? He's invented a personality that everyone hates and would like to see dead. (Painfully if possible, but dead at any rate). If you people really believe that JJB will die in ep. III, you will flock to the theatres in droves to view that joyous consumation. So all lucas has to do is start a rumor that JJB will indeed die and ep. III's inital box office success is secured. Smart.

    -horne-fisher

    1. Re:Lucas is a flamin genius by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 2

      The motivation was to create a slapstick character that would appeal to very small children, people who are stoned, and the Japanese.

      Someone should get Jar Jar a role on the Teletubbies, that would be perfect.

      --

      "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

  183. Remember the classics... by danro · · Score: 2

    My bet is that Anakin kills Dooku meaning to do good but ends up taking his place by Palpatines side.
    You know, the old "good intentions gone bad" plot...
    It would fit Palpatines caracter well too, remember that he later tries the same trick on Luke. Geting him to kill Anakin and take his place.

    As for Windu, he will probably be killed of in a down and dirty backstabbing (maybe even physically by Palpatine himself), or die last in a glorious "last stand of the Jedi" against Palpatines clone troopers. Personally I would like the former better, but I don't think Lucas can resist the "last stand" cliche.

    Joda will not kill anyone. It would be out of caracter for the "wise sensei"-type.

    Remember, Lucas is big on classic story themes, and the three I mentioned are common. Just check out any Greek tragedy or Shakespear play.
    Just my 0.02 kr...

    --

    "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    1. Re:Remember the classics... by Zordak · · Score: 5, Funny
      As for Windu, he will probably be killed of in a down and dirty backstabbing (maybe even physically by Palpatine himself), or die last in a glorious "last stand of the Jedi" against Palpatines clone troopers. Personally I would like the former better, but I don't think Lucas can resist the "last stand" cliche.

      Actually, I got ahold of a bootleg copy of the script for EP III on the internet, and found this interesting little piece of dialog just before Mace Windu's death:

      Boba Fet: Hello, my name is Boba Fet. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

      Mace Windu: STOP SAYING THAT!!!

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    2. Re:Remember the classics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I browse at +1 with Hard Thresholds

      I hate when people put their browsing preferences in their sigs. FUCK YOU. NO ONE GIVES A SHIT!

    3. Re:Remember the classics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL!

      mod that shit up

    4. Re:Remember the classics... by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      Boba Fet: Hello, my name is Boba Fet. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

      Mace Windu: STOP SAYING THAT!!!


      Actually, it's more like:

      MACE:
      Looks like me and Obi-Wan caught you at breakfast, sorry 'bout that. What'cha eatin'?

      BOBA FETT:
      Banthaburgers.

      MACE:
      Banthaburgers. The cornerstone of any nutritious breakfast. What kinda banthaburgers?

      BOBA:
      Cheesebanthaburgers.

      MACE:
      No, I mean where did you get'em? Mos Eisley, Owen's, Tatooine Greasy Spoon, where?

      BOBA:
      Big Jabba Burger.

      MACE:
      Big Jabba Burger. That's that Huttese banthaburger joint. I heard they got some tasty burgers. I ain't never had one myself, how are they?

      BOBA:
      They're good.

      MACE:
      Mind if I try one of yours?

      BOBA FETT:
      No.

      MACE:
      Yours is this one, right?

      BOBA FETT:
      Yeah.

      MACE:
      Uuummmm, that's a tasty burger. You know what they call a Banthaburger on Naboo?...

      (at which point BOBA FETT's anonymous bigchested female assassin associate bursts into the room and fires twenty blaster rounds straight at MACE's head)...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    5. Re:Remember the classics... by Ashyukun · · Score: 1
      (at which point BOBA FETT's anonymous bigchested female assassin associate bursts into the room and fires twenty blaster rounds straight at MACE's head)...



      All of which, miraculously, miss.

    6. Re:Remember the classics... by Cplus · · Score: 2

      Not to be the guy that's too into this, but Samuel L. Jackson has publicly stated that he asked George Lucas to write an honourable end to Mace Windu. George apparently agreed.........can't picture Sam Jackson being cool about a backstabbing death. Mace has to die for something important.

      --
      "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
    7. Re:Remember the classics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it'll be more like this:

      Boba Fet: Hello, my name is Boba Fet. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

      Mace Windu: STOP SAYING THAT
      , motherfucker !!!

  184. Umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anakin gets set up by an evil jedi woman Darth Xio or something on the orders of Palpatine (Darth Sidious). Palpatine shows the event to Padme who goes ballistic. Palpatine then manipulates Anakin into thinking that his Jedi friends did that etc. blah blah Anakin falls into lava pit or something, gets rescued by Darth Sidious and is installed with the latest in black skull-like helmets with a bad-ass breathing sound.

    Actually, I find the entire story sad. Anakin was a very promising jedi and his life was destroyed by a dark jedi. Even Anakin's love with the oh-so-wonderfully-sweet Padme (Natalie Portman) is destroyed. The hero then becomes a demon... such sadness.

  185. How pathetic can you be ? by Augusto · · Score: 2

    George, why couldn't you have died in the 80s and left us imagining how great the movies could have been ?

    Wow, talk about being a totally lifeless loser ! Whishing somebody had died so his view of a movie wouldn't be screwed up. Oh man !

    How about this ? Don't see the new movies and the new releases, I'm sure you can buy tapes of the orinal movies and watch them all day so your world is not shattered !

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:How pathetic can you be ? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
      Maybe you misunderstand my point of view...

      Star Wars was a cinematic revolution of sorts. And a tough act to follow. What did George Lucas do since then? Howard the Duck is the only thing that comes to mind. so 20 years later he wants to relive his glory, like a high school jock that got drafted to the pros, but gets bumped and now works as a used car salesman, trying desperately to remind everyone he meets that he was once famous.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:How pathetic can you be ? by Augusto · · Score: 2

      George Lucas is a "used car salesman" that was once famous ? I don't know in what reality you lived, considering how much money the current movies are making and the 3rd one will make.

      Not only to mention that after A New Hope he was involved in a little thing called Indiana Jones, and among other little things, the creating the premier special effects house that is still the "one to beat".

      Not only that, but this "has been" as you seem to call him, is currently doing what no other studio would dare, which is to promote the use of digital recording and projection for a major motion picture. Yes, he didn't get the thousands of digital screens he wanted, but a lot more got installed just for his "little" movie.

      --

      - sigs are for wimps.
  186. A simple analogy by sgtsanity · · Score: 1

    George Lucas changing the originals to fit the prequels is like Peter Jackson taking out Tom Bombadil in the LotR book to fit the movie. It's just plain stupid.

    1. Re:A simple analogy by taradfong · · Score: 1

      While I missed Tom Bombadil, it turns out that critics of LoTR >the Book complained that the Tom B. episode seemed incongruous when the book was released.

      --
      Does it hurt to hear them lying? Was this the only world you had?
  187. Star Wars needs Service Packs by Picass0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now every year or two you'll have to patch Star Wars to keep it current. SP1 will patch inconsistancies with caracter's memories, age, and correct lightsaber colors!

    1. Re:Star Wars needs Service Packs by Alsee · · Score: 2

      you'll have to patch Star Wars to keep it current. SP1 will patch inconsistancies with caracter's memories, age, and correct lightsaber colors!

      Yeah yeah yeah. Sigh.
      The first priority is always the eye-candy interface. As usual we have to wait for SP2 before they get around to patching the unchecked buffers and blank administrator password.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  188. I'm sorry, but look... by Artifex · · Score: 2

    The original movie has been out for 25 years, now.
    It makes sense to actually do a complete remake of it, in the hope that it will breathe new life into the story, and appeal to a new generation.

    If the remake sucks, well... we still have the original.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  189. R2-D2 by felipeal · · Score: 2

    Maybe he will also change the scene at the begining of ANH where Obi Wan tells Luke he had never seen that droid before:

    LUKE: Then the droid does belong to you.

    BEN: Don't seem to remember ever owning a droid. Very interesting...

    1. Re:R2-D2 by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Why?

      They haven't shown that Kenobi owns a droid.

      I think it's pretty commonly known that Lucas hadn't got all the stories straight before he started making the movie, but that particular line doesn't mess with the continuity.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:R2-D2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did Ben ever tell Luke the whole truth about anything. He never said he didn't know who R2 was just that he didn't 'own' him. He did seem to exactly know how to activate the holo-projector. Beside instead of both droids being mind-wiped it would be cooler if R2 had his memories and the only one who can understand him C-3PO doesn't believe him.

  190. Only if they give ya the orignal.. by pstreck · · Score: 1

    Don't get me wrong i hate jar-jar as much as the next geek, but this would be a really cool proof of concept and they would have to give ya the orignal "untainted" version.

    --

    Later,
    Phil
  191. Get a life you people!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't news!!!!!

    If you keep focusing on this, you'll be virgins forever!

  192. dumb nerds is right.. by SethJohnson · · Score: 0, Troll


    I love that scene in Indiana Jones where he dispatches some dumb nerd with his pistol.

    What in the fuck do you have a fake samurai sword for? Get a life and go outside and find a girlfriend you can beat up. Sheesh.
    1. Re:dumb nerds is right.. by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      True story: the original plan was to have an extended fight between the scimitar waving guy and Indy.

      Problem was, they filmed it outside the USA. American + bad water in third world = health problems.

      Apparently our Harry was on the set, creased over with an apparently critical impending fit of near-fatal diarrhoea.

      So, everyone's like, "OK, ready to shoot the extended very physical scene we rehearsed in LA?" and Harry's got a case of quivering sphincter that's about to hit Defcon III. So he walks up to the stunt monkey and says "look, do me a favour, no matter what happens, just play along." So they yell "Action" and Harrison pulls the gun, fires, the other guy drops, the director yells "CUT!" and Harrison takes off for the john at Mach 4.

      Turns out, they loved the ad-lib when they watched the rushes, and chose not to reschedule the scene. Just think, if it wasn't for intestinal parasites and Montezuma's revenge, that scene would never have been.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    2. Re:dumb nerds is right.. by pbuxton · · Score: 1
      And all that running around he did, knocking over baskets, was that all stunt doubles? Do people think anymore?

      Go mail-bomb your 'friends' with some more urban letter chain mails, B1FF.

    3. Re:dumb nerds is right.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said it was a TRUE STORY, ya fuckin twat. What the fuck do you need to convince you?

  193. Not 9 Movies. No, really. Just 6. by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back in 1977, right after Star Wars became a huge hit, Lucas had said that he did indeed have the rest of the story more or less sketched out, and that he thought it would take 9 movies to do it. Heck, originally he wanted to put the entire Anakin cycle in ONE movie, but it was way too long. He wasn't expecting Star Wars to succeed, he just wanted to make a fun movie. Then it hit it big and he said, "Hmm..." Anyway, originally he thought it would take 9 movies, but a short while later he realized that he didn't have enough story for 9 -- 6 movies would do. Ever since then is the oft-repeated myth that there's going to be 3 more movies after Episode III finishes. If there are, it's not going to be part of the Anakin cycle (well, naturally, since Anakin dies in ROTJ).

    I don't discount the possibility that there could be more Star Wars movies after Episode III, but I personally don't think Lucas will want to put out the effort. Remember, he's going to be 61 years old when Episode 3 comes out, and productions of this magnitude take a huge amount of effort. I suppose he could act in more of a supervisory role and let someone else handle more of the day-to-day duties, but, the question of Lucas' talent aside, would such movies FEEL like "Star Wars"? Hard to see, the future is. Not to mention the fact that the story arc would be more or less unrelated to Eps. 1-6, and we probably wouldn't have the same emotional attachments we've formed with the characters we already know.

    It has occurred to me that an "interim" movie would be possible, something that takes place between episodes 3 and 4 (call it "Star Wars: Rise of the Empire" with no "Episode N" part) that bridges the 20-year gap... maybe giving some details of the Empire's atrocities, Luke and Leia's upbringings, maybe Han's background, etc. Just a thought of my own.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  194. You're just who Lucas is looking for by Wind_Walker · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I do not mean to offend you, but you're exactly the kind of Star Wars fan that Lucas wants. You'll take any shit that he puts on celluloid and eat it right up. Since you say "...I'll eat it up" I assume that means you'll buy the new version of his movies. Wow, another couple billion in his pocket. And if it sucks, then you'll still rent the video and see how bad it sucks; only about 200 million in his pocket.

    Oh, and calling Star Wars one of the most epic stories ever written is pathetic. Read some books for God's sake. Ever heard of The Illiad? The Odyssey? The Maha-Barata? Fucking BEOWULF, for God's sake! Get out more!

    1. Re:You're just who Lucas is looking for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      BEOWULF, for God's sake

      Just because it was the first, doesn't mean it is good.

    2. Re:You're just who Lucas is looking for by tgibbs · · Score: 1
      Oh, and calling Star Wars one of the most epic stories ever written is pathetic. Read some books for God's sake. Ever heard of The Illiad? The Odyssey? The Maha-Barata? Fucking BEOWULF, for God's sake! Get out more!
      No, it ain't the Mahabarata. So why do you react as if Lukas is meddling with Holy Writ?
    3. Re:You're just who Lucas is looking for by prizzznecious · · Score: 1

      The reason why Star Wars is one of the most epic stories ever told is because unlike those static documents you listed are exactly that: static. Star Wars, on the other hand, is continually revisited and revised with the compound intelligence of millions of fans and dozens of authors. Certainly epic poetry has its value, and I wouldn't claim that Star Wars outclasses those poems, but it's more comparable than you allow.

      --

      visit the hwky website for a lyrical genius infusion.
    4. Re:You're just who Lucas is looking for by opcenter · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of "The Maha-Barata", but the other three you mentioned are three of the most boring and long winded stories I've ever heard or read.... especially Beowulf. At least Star Wars has some flow to it. Just because it was written/created within the last century doesn't make it not an epic.

      And if you truly had no intention of offending the person you replied to, you failed miserably.

    5. Re:You're just who Lucas is looking for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've read the Iliad and the Odyssey; I've seen stagings of lots of the Mahabharata; I've read two translations of Beowulf. Add the Aeniad: much of which I've read in the original.

      Star Wars is one of the most epic stories ever written.

      Don't agree? Perhaps you need to stay in a little more, read a little more, get educated.

    6. Re:You're just who Lucas is looking for by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Sorry, Beowulf wasn't written in the last millenium, let alone the last century.

      I agree with your point about beowulf, and a lot of older stuff. Some people may love it, and scholars will pore over every detail, but it's just an academic exercise.

      There are certain universal human themes, and I don't think using them in a story should be called "rehashing".

    7. Re:You're just who Lucas is looking for by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2

      Hmm...interesting concept...defining something using its antonym. I suppose that Windows 98 is a secure operating system because unlike Linux it gets hacked a lot?

      Epics are fundamentally incredibly large stories, and Star Wars does fit the bill there. However, they are also so universal that they speak to all generations without change. While I'll agree that people of all ages like Star Wars, and history could eventually call it an epic, for the moment it is definitely contemporary.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    8. Re:You're just who Lucas is looking for by jmb-d · · Score: 1

      Oh, and calling Star Wars one of the most epic stories ever written is pathetic. Read some books for God's sake. Ever heard of The Illiad? The Odyssey? The Maha-Barata? Fucking BEOWULF, for God's sake! Get out more!

      You misspelled "Stay in more!". Hope this helps.

      Personally, I find it difficult to read while I'm out. If it's not the sun in my eyes, it's the wind turning the pages...

      --
      In walking, just walk. In sitting, just sit. Above all, don't wobble.
      -- Yun-Men
    9. Re:You're just who Lucas is looking for by Razzak · · Score: 1

      It's because he's put out good stuff before, and earned TRUST that his new shit will be good. I've liked all the new star wars more than the shitty movies that i've spent money to go see lately.

      Don't pull that holier than thou movie bull with me. I *know* you spent money to go see Tomb Raider.

      Every Star Wars movie has been entertaining to me, and until he puts together a couple shitty ones in a row, I'll keep going to see it because odds are it's gonna entertain me.

    10. Re:You're just who Lucas is looking for by prizzznecious · · Score: 1

      You're pretty incoherent. Everything at the moment is contemporary. For something to be contemporary does not necessarily preclude its status as an epic.

      Obviously, since we perceive time linearly, it is only necessary for an epic to speak to future generations, rather than all generations. Cavemen would have just as much trouble understanding Beowulf as the ancient Greeks would have with Star Wars. And there's no evidence that I can see that would indicate that humans in hundreds or thousands of years would suddenly stop being able to understand Star Wars.

      The Greeks considered Homer to be an epic poet (as they distinguished him from a lyric poet)--why should we restrain from speculating about the epic-ness of Star Wars?

      --

      visit the hwky website for a lyrical genius infusion.
    11. Re:You're just who Lucas is looking for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could not agree with you more.

    12. Re:You're just who Lucas is looking for by Cafeeine · · Score: 1

      The Odyssey and the Iliad was told by troubadours long before Homer put it on paper ..er papurus. The final form as it survived was Homer's but the story, and a lot of the elements in it predated him, so these were truly epics ...
      That was a little offtopic so I should state my opinion that what Lukas is doing.
      This in effect is trying to turn something that is a masterpiece as a moment in time, into a timeless story .... quite possibly to be redone 20 years in the future in true 3d or whatever ... so that the main idea isn't lost. I personally dont believe that the story is that good ...

      As for the merchandising ... its common in all modern films, why not in the films of the man that revolutionized it? The man has to make money, its the american way. I don't mind it half as much as his audacity to try to make his own hallmark into a gift to humanity
      Thomas edison gave us the telephone,
      Bill Gates gave us Windows,
      George Lucas gave us Star Wars ...

      Oh Please

  195. Stop milking that cow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First he releases the movies in VHS. Then on theaters with new scenes, then on VHS again with new sequences. Now a new version and then what? Again and again and again?

    And at this point, be honest: can anyone make sense of all the names of the dozens of products out there? Starfighter and Jedi Starfighter released almost simultaneously. Give us a break!

  196. Damn! by Matey-O · · Score: 2

    Am I the only one that's reading this thread and thinking 'It's like Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back' all over again!

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  197. And now by The+Cat · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the home office in Anchorage, Alaska, the TOP TEN PLACES TO ADD JAR-JAR IN EPISODE 4:

    10. Orbiting Tatooine in the opening scene.
    9. Sweeping the hallway on the Princess' ship right before the stormtroopers cut through the door
    8. In the first escape pod from the Princess' ship
    7. Standing behind Obi-Wan at the bar
    6. Under the table during Greedo and Han's conversation
    5. Admiring the Millenium Falcon from the doorway just prior to its departure
    4. Running a lemonade stand on Alderaan
    3. Last (almost) through the blast doors
    2. Porkins' co-pilot

    ..and the NUMBER ONE place for Jar-Jar in Episode 4:

    1. In the exhaust shaft!

    1. Re:And now by frozenray · · Score: 1


      0. As a favored guest at my dinner table

      Pass the ketchup, please.

      --
      "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
  198. R2D2 Memory by bigdavex · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lucas also reportedly told E! Online that the reason droids C-3P0 and R2-D2 have no memory of Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader is because their memories have been wiped prior to the beginning of Episode IV, the original Star Wars movie. "[C-3P0's] memory system has been erased, and so has R2's," Lucas told the site. "So they don't remember anything from the first trilogy. I'm telling you something from Episode III, but I shouldn't be telling you that, but I think most of the fans already know that."

    That explains a lot. R2 doesn't fly in episodes 4-6 because he forgot he can.
    --
    -Dave
    1. Re:R2D2 Memory by kerrbear · · Score: 2

      That explains a lot. R2 doesn't fly in episodes 4-6 because he forgot he can.

      Yah, don't forget Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru have their memories erased as well- so they forget R2 and C3PO. Oh wait, Annakin has his memory erased too, so he doesnt think to look for his son on Tatooine. But no- that will interfere with the new Darth Vader clip inserted into Episode IV where he goes down to Tatooine to have a few drinks with his former owner. Etc. Etc. Bleh.

    2. Re:R2D2 Memory by soulsteal · · Score: 2
      Man, forget R2 and his flying lessons....

      Threepio has to re-learn over 6 million languages!

  199. Here's some additions what would help... IMHO by litewoheat · · Score: 2

    Replace the Emperor hologram in Empire with one done by the current actor, Ian somethingorother.

    Redub the Storm Trooper voices (and maybe even Boba Fett) using the new Clone Trooper/Jango voice.

    In ANH, add some Senate scenes including where Palpatine disbands the body.

    IN ROTJ, CGI in some Nemodians in the Emperor's entourage

    1. Re:Here's some additions what would help... IMHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eeeh.. Palpatine IS the same actor in ROTJ as in the new films. Check imdb.com.

    2. Re:Here's some additions what would help... IMHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I need to say is, "You're an idiot", and maybe you should learn to read and/or comprehend better.

  200. If he's doing requests... by nagora · · Score: 1
    I'd like to see a scene between Dooku and Tarkin, for old time's sake. Nothing special, just handing the Death Star plans over and turning away.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  201. I have no problem with this if it's done right. by eclipsemgp · · Score: 1

    Do it James Cameron style. He released T2 super-duper special edition DVD (the one in the silver case). There was about 25 minutes of extra footage that he put in which slightly altered the story. You can watch the movie with it or without it. That's great, now I have the movie as it was originally played plus the extra footage added. Just release it that way so i can see the movie as it origianlly was, plus let me see the movie updated with new junk. This of course will never happen because Lucas has to release 8 million different editions.

  202. Erased Memories by Todd1 · · Score: 1

    According to Lucas, the droids have their memories erased prior to Episode IV. Now, does Obi-Wan also have his memory erased so he doesn't remember the droids??

    1. Re:Erased Memories by drbart · · Score: 1

      Not to mention "Uncle Owen", who had C3PO working on his farm all the while Schmi was with them.

      And he's met R2, of course.

  203. Caution: Nerds Overreacting by sg3000 · · Score: 2

    > Sci-fi Wire is reporting a couple rumors
    > about the changes being made to the
    > original Star Wars trilogy for its next release.
    > That being that Natalie Portman may be
    > being inserted into Episode VI: Return of the
    > Jedi and that universally reviled Jar Jar Binks

    This sounds a lot like the complaining people made when they heard N' Sync (or whoever the hell they were) was supposed to be in Episode II. I don't remember seeing them there, and if they were, it certainly didn't affect how I enjoyed the flick.

    Look, it's a movie, not the New Testament. If Lucas wants to change his movie -- it's his own decision.

    I for one would like to see IV-VI touched up a bit when it hits DVD. First, replace the actor playing the Emperor in V with the guy who plays him in I, II, and VI. Second, digitally remove the puppets from the cantina scene in IV and the puppets in VI. Third, get rid of the ewoks.

    --
    Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
  204. Palpatine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you mean palatine? As in, "One invested with royal privileges and rights within his domains"?

    You know, kids, gdict can also be used to check spelling.

    1. Re:Palpatine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As in Palpatine, you know, the guy who becomes The Emperor.

      What stupid fuckwit.

  205. Re:I knew it.... Star Wars XP - by CleverNickName · · Score: 2

    with new integrated scenses - they're part of the script, they can't be removed.

    Yeah, and the last 35 minutes of the movie is just a BSOD.

  206. Just A Movie??!!! What are you saying? by TheLastUser · · Score: 1

    Haven't you been keeping up? Star Wars is the greatest Epic ever told. More riviting than "Seven Pillars of Wisdom", more witty than "Don Quixote", more intricate than anything by Raymond Chandler ever wrote, more sweeping than "War and Peace".

    Yup, I'll wager a copy of windows 98 that in 100 years the Star Wars story will be seen as the seminal work of modern man.

    Anyone that would imply otherwise is, frankly, insane.

    :-)

    1. Re:Just A Movie??!!! What are you saying? by cjpez · · Score: 2
      How right you are. A curse on me and my family for generations to come for such blasphemy! I shall go commit seppuku now.

      :)

  207. How ironic by snkline · · Score: 1

    Parent topic: quick! buy the originals now!

    before all you can find are the "improved" version! Time to go fire up gnutella and start looking for A New Hope . . .

    I wonder if the irony was intentional...

    1. Re:How ironic by kraada · · Score: 1

      of course it was :)

  208. Thank God... by mesozoic · · Score: 1

    ...that I own the original versions. :)

  209. Darn. I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Padma would morph into Chewbacca. Guess my prediction was wrong.

  210. Sounds like a good idea... by Zeekamotay · · Score: 1
  211. Re:Not 9 Movies. No, really. Just 6. by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Informative
    As an addendum to the above post, here's a quote from the Star Wars FAQ on the official Star Wars website:
    # Episode VII and Beyond

    1. Wasn't Star Wars going to be nine or more parts? Will sequels be made set after Return of the Jedi?

    Early on in the saga's development, some thought was given to have a trilogy set after Return of the Jedi. George Lucas has long since changed his mind, and the entire Star Wars saga will now encompass six episodes, starting with The Phantom Menace, and ending with Return of the Jedi. There will be no future Star Wars films set after Return of the Jedi.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  212. Jar Jar Portman by spruce · · Score: 0

    If Natalie Portman talked and acted like Jar Jar Binks but looked like she does now, would you still want to nail her? I honestly can't make up my mind.

    "Mesa love you long long time. Mesa yous humbule sex servaunt."

    Ughhh. Sorry.

    1. Re:Jar Jar Portman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? She can't say anything with a cock jammed in her mouth.

  213. Why not other movies? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1
    Why chose Star Wars, why not chose movies that really need it?


    * Lets remove Paulie Shore from all movies. Change him with an actor. A real one.

    * Remove Keanu Reaves from all movies except Bill & Ted I and II, Speed, and maybe the Matrix (Keanu only is good if he's playing someone confused, he was in the Matrix).

    * Go back to the Terminator movies, change Arnold's voice so you don't have to explain why a Robot designed by the Robots from an American firm has a strong Australian accent.

    1. Re:Why not other movies? by aclute · · Score: 1
      Go back to the Terminator movies, change Arnold's voice so you don't have to explain why a Robot designed by the Robots from an American firm has a strong Australian accent.

      Or, maybe an Austrian accent?!?!

      I don't think we heard Arnold saying "G'Day Mate!"

  214. Changes? Good, let me tell you why by chazzf · · Score: 2

    As I see, George Lucas is staring at a fundamental problem for his movies. Yes, his. They aren't mine, they aren't yours, they aren't even the MPAA's.

    The problem is that Trilogy 1 (I-III) and Trilogy 2 (IV-VI) occur in substantially different parts of the galaxy, with substantially different characters. Episode I and II have featured politicians, the fucking amazing artistry that is Coruscant, the Jedi Order, battle droids, massive factory worlds. Episodes IV through IV feature mainly military men, on both sides, a lot of backwaters, a few rare Force-users...does anyone else see a glaring problem?

    Let me first say, before this next section of my post, that Empire Strikes Back is my favorite of the series, followed by A New Hope and Attack of the Clones. But really, what there needs to be is something else tying the trilogies. Where is the galaxy from Episode II to be found in the original three? Nowhere. We never see Coruscant, or Naboo, or Kimono, Geneosis. Logically, we should see these places. The Emperor, such an important figure in the first three movies, is not even see until Episode VI, and is only hinted at before then. It was a good storytelling technique, until prequels that brought him to the forefront. These and many other issues need to be reconciled (if anything is to be changed at all, of course).

    For those that skipped to the bottom, the creation of the new trilogy has made the point of view of the old trilogy problematic. There, I've said it.

    ~Chazzf

    --
    No statement is true, not even this one.
  215. New Yoda scenes for Ep. V by raider_red · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the other suggestions, but I wouldn't mind seeing a Yoda vs. Luke Skywalker sparring match with lightsabers.

    Any other ideas for what to do with a CGI Yoda?

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    1. Re:New Yoda scenes for Ep. V by DenOfEarth · · Score: 1

      well, this sounds reasonable, but I kind of like the yoda in Empire better than the yoda in Clones anyways...the puppetry makes him look frail and old, while at the same time allows luke/r2 to act interactively with hime in a realistic manner.

  216. WARNING: AOTC SPOILER by danro · · Score: 2

    Not to mention the can-o'-whoopass count Dooku opens up on Obi One in AOTC.
    He survives not one, but two lightsabre slashes. And not only survives, he is not even maimed, lucking out with only superficial cuts.
    ...as opposed to a certain sith-lord-in-training who experience a sudden 10kg weight loss trying to save Obi Wan's ass.

    --

    "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
  217. The problem with Lucas is that... by Braintrust · · Score: 1

    ... he read David Brin's novel Earth at some point, and an idea from that book has stuck in his head. He just wants to be the first, that's all.

    --
    Years later, a doctor will tell me that I have an I.Q. of 48, and am what some people call "mentally retarded".
  218. I also heard.. by phocuz · · Score: 1

    ...that in the remakes of the old movies, Darth Jar Jar will have a major role.

  219. come on now, think of the possibilities! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Jar Jar in episode IV opens up entire universes of opportunity. After all, Vader was really not _that_ evil in the first episode. I think he should slaughter every one of the stupid gungans and slowly torture that floppy eared ganga asshole. Then there are rancors that could be introduced to Jar Jar... multipel Rancors to fight over the largest pieces. "Meeso bloody" Then we have the wonderful cold vacuum of space... lets see how that twerp flails about in utter agony in vacuum for the amusement of Vader (and the audience). I believe there is something called a Krayt Dragon that would find mr. Jar Jar rather tasty.

    Oh the possibilities... *shudders with extacy*

  220. The Boondocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is this comic by Aaron McGruder called The Boondocks. Anyway, one of the recent ones went as follows.

    Guy1: Well, I saw "Attack of the Clones." I Gotta admit I may have found a new respect for George Lucas.

    Guy2: Really?

    Guy1: The whole movie is clearly allegorical to president Bush's true motives behind the war on terrorism. He even implies that Bush and Bin Laden are actually working together -- And people think I'm Radical!

    Guy2: Well, now that you mention it....

    Guy1: Five Bucks says that Lucas won't live to see "Episode Three."

    All of the Boondocks Comics that I've read have all been great. I think they're available somewhere online, but I forget where.

    -Greg

  221. It ain't history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucas can do any damn thing he pleases. How about inserting Jar-Jar into Natalie Portman?

  222. Re:C-3P0 and R2-D2 have no memory of Anakin Skywal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just find it amazing that after 20 years the protocol droids still look and sound exactly the same as they did 20 years ago. I guess that just goes to show you that this REALLY is a vastly different universe than the one we live in, where devices manufactured 5 years ago seldom resemble their contemporaries of 5 years later. Let alone 20!!

    If the star wars universe was anything like our own, C3PO would be instantly recognisable as an "antique" and possibly a "classic" incarnation of the Protocol droid's "shiny gold era".

    You think I don't still recognize it when I see an exact copy of the IBM PC 8088 that I had as a child? It's EASILY distinguishable from the PCs of today.

    I don't see why he had to include all this stupid foreshadowing for the original movies anyhow.. Like for F**k sakes, WE GET IT ALREADY!! How many times to you have to tie it all together for us? He's got so many strings linking up to the original series that he's tripping over them, making more plot inconsistencies than he's fixing!

    And I gotta say I'm dissapointed to hear that AOTC did not open with the gratuitous slaying of JarJar Binks. That was the only way he could have made it up to me, and he missed out. It's not like I was keeping my desires a secret or anything..

    Ugh.. I hate my job.

  223. Re:Not 9 Movies. No, really. Just 6. But Really 12 by mchummer · · Score: 1

    I distinctly remember...
    You'ld really have to dig through the EARLY interviews with Lucas on the Star Wars series but he ORIGINALY announced in press interviews that he would do 4 trilogies, not 3 ! However, this was downsized to 3 trilogies very quickly and the 4th forgotten.

    Hey - I just report the facts. I was really hooked reading any news article on Star Wars I could get my hands on.

    McHummer

  224. Re:Polymorphic movies - your sig by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    You couldn't have picked a better sig for this topic if you'd planned it.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  225. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  226. Star Wars was WIRED, now way-way TIRED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on. Get over it. Star Wars belongs in the 70's and 80's with the Bee Gees, platform shoes for guys, shag haircuts, and mirrored disco balls. The story is lame, the characters more lame, and the writers and directors abysmally lacking in talent and creativity. I don't give a Wookies ass if I ever see any of them again. Give me more Spiderman and LOTR. Le Roi est mort, vive Le Roi.

  227. Re: Stupid Star Wars nerds - Triumph special (OT) by plone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you want a spoiler?
    You will die alone!

  228. I can see it now.. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 5, Funny



    Episode IV: Jar Jar steps in Jawa poo.

    Episode V: Jar Jar steps in Jabba the Hut's poo.

    Episode VI: Jar Jar steps in Ewok poo.

    I just think Lucas is trying to insert "poo" analogies in his films. Pretty soon, Vader will be re-dubbed to refer to his army of "stormpoopers". Han Solo will be encased in poop instead of carbonite, AT-ATs will step in poop, and and the climax of the saga will be when Vader gets unmasked, only to say "Poop, I am your faaaa-tha."

    Save The Planet - Nuke California,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:I can see it now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this isn't funny...crawl back in your hole you troll

  229. I knew it...... by pimpmaster · · Score: 1

    George has lost his mind, adding Jar-Jar to Star Wars IV: A New Hope is like having Greedo shoot first.GEORGE HAS BEEN CRAZY FOR YEARS

    --


    "Now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb." Dark Helmet - Spaceballs
  230. from email... by GoNINzo · · Score: 5, Funny
    There's going to be an extra scene included in the DVD release of EMPIRE STRIKES BACK coming up next year! Basically, it expands on the scene where Vader reveals his fatherhood to Luke, and ties up some loose ends created with the release of Episode 1.

    INT: BESPIN GANTRY - MOMENTS LATER:

    A furious lightsaber duel is underway. DARTH VADER is backing LUKE SKYWALKER towards the end of the gantry. A quick move by Vader, chops off Luke's hand! It goes spinning off into the ventilation shaft. Luke backs away. He looks around, but realizes there's nowhere to go but straight down.

    Darth Vader: Obi Wan never told you what happened to your father.
    Luke: He told me enough! He told me you killed him!
    Darth Vader: No... I am your father!
    Luke: No, it's not true! It's impossible.
    Darth Vader: Search your feelings... you know it to be true...
    Luke: NO!
    Darth Vader: Yes, it is true... and you know what else? You know that brass droid of yours?
    Luke: Threepio?
    Darth Vader: Yes... Threepio... I built him... when I was 7 years old...
    Luke: No...
    Darth Vader: Seven years old? And what have you done? Look at yourself, no hand, no job, and couldn't even levitate your own ship out of the swamp...
    Luke: I destroyed your precious Death Star!
    Darth Vader: When you were 20! When I was 10, I single-handedly destroyed a Trade Federation Droid Control ship!
    Luke: Well, it's not my fault...
    Darth Vader: Oh, here we go... "Poor me... my father never gave me what I wanted for my birthday... boo hoo, my daddy's the Dark Lord of the Sith... waahhh wahhh!"
    Luke: Shut up...
    Darth Vader: You're a slacker! By the time I was your age, I had exterminated the Jedi knights!
    Luke: I used to race my T-16 through Beggar's Canyon.
    Darth Vader: Oh, for the love of the Emperor... 10 years old, winner of the Boonta Eve Open... Only human to ever fly a Pod Racer... right here, baby!
    {Luke looks down the shaft. Takes a step towards it.}
    Darth Vader: I was wrong... You're not my kid... I don't know whose you are, but you sure ain't mine...
    {Luke takes a step off the platform, hesitates, then plunges down the shaft.}
    {Darth Vader looks after him.}
    Darth Vader: Get a haircut!

    --
    Gonzo Granzeau
    "Nothing the god of biomechanics wouldn't let you into heaven for.." -Roy Batty
    1. Re:from email... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wasn't funny. In fact, it was so unfunny that it made me angry. Fuck you.

    2. Re:from email... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck your "Fuck you" you anonymous-posting, angry-getting, unfunny-finding fucker!

      That was the funniest thing I've read on Slashdot in weeks.

    3. Re:from email... by Mark+Gordon · · Score: 2

      Now imagine that animated, with LEGO figures. Hmm... sounds vaguely familiar...

  231. 2000 YEARS UP YOUR ASS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ". . . one of the most epic stories ever told"

    No. It's just one of the more well known stories.

    There are 10 x 32^65 more stories that are excrutiatingly more epic than Star Wars. But, then again, for your fucking shallow little dick fuck dumb outlook, it's pretty epic, and Friends, on NBC, is one of the greatest comedies of all time.

    Idiot.

  232. Rage...consuming...meeee!!!! by mu_wtfo · · Score: 1

    Well, I have mod points, and I was gonna use 'em on this discusion, but then I read the link....AAARGGHHH!!!! I now want to beat the living hell out of George Lucas, even if the rumors are false. If they're true?? If I, one day, should be watching Star Wars (ep IV, blah, blah, blah) and see JAR JAR FUCKING BINKS on my TV screen, then my journey to the dark side will be complete. Darth Mu. That's me.
    What a jackass.

    --
    If all the world's a stage, anyone who says they want better lighting spends far too much time in a dark theatre.
  233. Man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When someone posts even far-fledged *rumors* about Star Wars, it gets posted up on /. ?

    Sad.

  234. A pity in a way... by smcv · · Score: 1

    If Lucas wanted to make more films, it'd be difficult to fit anything less than 15-20 years after SW4:ANH without completely breaking continuity with the books.

    Having said that, some of the books could make great films; Heir to the Empire/Dark Force Rising/Last Command, anyone? (They've already made pretty good graphic novels, if the one I read is anything to go by). They introduce some great characters (former Imperial assassin Mara Jade, and of course the inimitable Grand Admiral Thrawn), and even portray Imperial leaders in a more ambiguous light than in the films (particularly Thrawn and his second-in-command Pellaeon). Outside that trilogy, I, Jedi also rules.

  235. No shit George by Rand+Race · · Score: 2
    Lucas also reportedly told E! Online that the reason droids C-3P0 and R2-D2 have no memory of Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader is because their memories have been wiped prior to the beginning of Episode IV, the original Star Wars movie. "[C-3P0's] memory system has been erased, and so has R2's,...


    Kinda obvious that. The question is: who wiped Obi-Wan's memory of them?

    --
    Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
  236. Obi-Wan Kenobi's memory wiped? by sessamoid · · Score: 2
    Lucas also reportedly told E! Online that the reason droids C-3P0 and R2-D2 have no memory of Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader is because their memories have been wiped prior to the beginning of Episode IV, the original Star Wars movie.

    I just finished watching ANH recently, and something odd occurred to me. I can buy Lucas' contention that the 'droids' memories were wiped prior to ANH, but that doesn't account for the fact that Ben Kenobi seems not to recognize the droids at all when they find him in the Tatooine desert. This is despite the fact that he spent some very pivotal moments in galactic history with those two. Is Lucas going to alter Episode IV to make up for this apparent gaffe as well?

    --
    "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
  237. You have a good guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was wondering the same - I bet you are correct

  238. It just doesn't matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After seeing episode1, I have learned to lower my expectations for the series. Since Return of the Jedi, I have gotten the feeling that Lucas is more interested in saturday morning cartoons, selling toys, and guest appearances on breakfast cerial boxes.

    As far as episode II (Attack Of The Clones...just look at the name), if you take out the lame acting, fairly decent writing, and the "lets get as much whiz-bang toy selling stuff as possible" theme, you actually have a fairly decent sci-fi scini-series.

    I fell in love with starwars when I was 7 when it first came out, and love to watch episodes 4 and 5 when they are replayed on cable.

    The real sad thing is that episode II had soooooo much potential.

    Of course, I have no real high expectations for episode 3. The bar just got lower.

  239. How to add Padme to the original films by EvilBastard · · Score: 2

    At the end of the third film, when she's hiding Luke and Leia, she changes her name to from Padme Armidala to Mon Mothma.

    Leader of the Opposition becomes Leader of the Resistance. And there's enough similarity in appearance between the two of them to pull it off.

    There you go, she's in the films, no need for CGI-Inserts, retroactive continuity or re-releasing yet another special edition to try to beat ET's all time box office record.

    No wonder Lucas didn't think of it

  240. Re:Changes? Good, let me tell you why by nagora · · Score: 1
    The Emperor, such an important figure in the first three movies,

    But is he? What if the Chancellor isn't the Emperor-to-be? Eh?

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  241. Whatever works by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    I'm probably the most pragmatic bitch with a cause in town. However, when I watched Ep. II I actually got swept up into it.

    All in all its just entertainment, it was fun and I hope they keep making them.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  242. JAR-JAR??? NO FrEAKING WAY by kupo+zero · · Score: 0

    Im not gonna go see these epsiodes if Jar Jar is in them. However, Natalie Portman is fine.Im sure you all know whay.

  243. R2 Memory Loss = No Trilogy by bsd-mon · · Score: 0

    So if R2's memory is erased, then there are no Death Star plans, and no holographic message to Ben, Luke remains a whiny moisture farmer spotting womp rats, and Leia is tortured and killed by Vader. That would make for some boring movies.

    Unless, of course, Lucas pulls out some retcon like "..umm, they only erased half of his memory". Hopefully he also explains why Anikin/Vader doesn't think to look for his son with his step-brother.

    --
    To read makes our speaking English good. - X. Harris
  244. Howard the duck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To anyone so stupid as to try and claim that George Lucas is a good director, I have three words for you.

    Howard The Duck

    Eat it.

  245. weird stuff by BaconLT · · Score: 0
    As I write this, the topic has 666 comments posted.

    weird

    --
    Who mediates your information?
  246. Episode III spoiler by jafac · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just got an email from George Lucas himself, asking me what I think of his proposed outline for Episode III (he said his outline for II finished up a week after filming started, we all know what a disaster that was, so he's trying to get a headstart on III).

    In III, it is 15 years later. The Clone Wars are in full swing. Chancellor Palpatine's "War on Secessionists" has killed many innocent people, but has failed to bring Count Dooku to justice.
    Amidala has secretly had Anakin's love babies - while Anakin has been called away to fight the "War on Secessionists" with his side kick ObiWan.

    Jar Jar accidentally flips the latch on Amidala's window in her high-rise as she leans on it to look out on the beatiful sunrise one morning (er - I wonder what Jar Jar was doing in Amidala's room in the early morning?). Anakin totally blows his top, and abandons his post, returning to Coruscant, he confronts Jar Jar, who admits that he was "doing" Amidala, and that Luke and Leia are really HIS. Anakin force-grabs Jar Jar, and lightsabers his arms and legs off, then shoves him out the same window, and before dropping him 5000 feet, tears his torso to shreds.

    In the meantime, ObiWan is instructed by Yoda to NOT confront Anakin, but instead, to protect Luke and Leia from his growing rage. So ObiWan successfully evades Anakin on Coruscant, abducts the children, and spirits them off to Bail Organa's home planet of Alderaan. To have him adopt them as the Jedi's ace in the hole against the growing menace of their loose cannon, Anakin.
    Anakin finds out and decides that the Jedi council is plotting against him, and needs to be destroyed. And so, he destroys them. Three escape. Yoda, Mace, and a new Jedi, Ell Ron Hubbardi played by John Travolta. A long hunting sequence plays out where Mace Windu and Ell Ron lead Anakin on a wild goose chase through the streets of Coruscant in a speeder, while Mace and Ell Ron philosophise about the meaning of life, the force, phenomenology, etc.

    While they stop for food at a "Space Denny's", Mace goes to the bathroom, and Anakin finally catches up to Ell Ron, and uses the Jedi Mind Trick (TM) to convince him that Mace is evil and that they should destroy eachother. Mace comes out of the bathroom, and they have the lightsaber duel to end all lightsaber duels. Properly disposed of, Anakin now ignores the two and pursues Yoda. But by now, the trail is cold, and he ends up on Alderaan, looking for the kids, so he can destroy them. ObiWan finds him first, and they duel nearly to the death, and Anakin is plunged into a volcano.

    Mace has destroyed Ell Ron Hubbardi, and it is in the remains of the shattered high-rise that was the Space Denny's that the emporer encounters him, all pissed off and shit. The emporer turns him to the dark side, and has him change his name to Darth Vader. The emporer says that he will tell everyone that Darth Vader is really Anakin, rescued from the Volcano, and rebuilt with off the shelf cyborg parts.

    Yoda catches up with Obi Wan, and tells him that they've got to change plans a bit, because having BOTH twins on Alderaan is a single-point of failure, so Obi Wan takes Luke to Tatooine, and sells him as a slave for a cheap hooker. Luke is eventually sold through several owners, who decide to get rid of him as soon as they find out how much he whines, until he ends up in the same fate as his grandmother Shmi. Eventually, Owen comes to love Luke and sets him free, and even stops molesting him - but continues to keep him on as a farmhand. Yoda, in the meantime, has hidden himself on Dagobah.

    Oh yeah, and one twist he wants to add.
    The Space Denny's actually gathers roadkill from all around Coruscant. People who have fallen out of windows, or their speeder's seatbelts weren't fastened, etc. And grinds them up as mystery meat. So Mace and Ell Ron were actually eating bits of Amidala and Jar Jar. And when Anakin stopped to warp Ell Ron's mind, he also took a bite of Mace's hamburger, containing bits of Amidala. In this way, Amidala's body became part of the force, and this is the route through which she becomes a ghost at the end of the re-made episode VI. Also, they'll have to reshoot the scenes where Vader takes off his mask in Episode V and VI (and his ghost scene at the end of VI) to replace him with Windu. This is also how Jar Jar's ghost ends up in Episode IV, because he was eaten by Mace, who was Darth Vader. Jar Jar's ghost will be in the scene where Obi Wan is killed, he'll tell Luke; "Luke! Meesa tink yoosa better get a runnin boss" - but he won't admit to being his true father, because that would present an obvious continutiy error with Episode V. In fact, it will never be revealed to Luke who his real father is, and when he pulls off Vader's mask at the end and sees that it's Mace, he'll chalk up the skin color difference to volcanic scorching or something.

    - - -
    I'm not sure what to say to George. I mean, I think he sent it to me by mistake - I actually opened it by mistake, because the subject line was "Enlarge your penis 500%!" -
    I think it's a great idea that hes getting a headstart, and I kind of like this better than where it looked like it was headed.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    1. Re:Episode III spoiler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too bad you (or whomever) spent so much time on something so powerfully unfunny and stupid.

      That didn't even get a grin. Not a chuckle. You fucking suck.

    2. Re:Episode III spoiler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was so fucking gay I can't even begin to flame.

      Fuck you and the mom you rode in on you fucking cretin.

    3. Re:Episode III spoiler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      god damn

      never tell a joke. ever. okay, just don't.

      so...fucking...ghey...

    4. Re:Episode III spoiler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your pathetic attempt at humor has failed. Fuck you.

    5. Re:Episode III spoiler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked it... thanks.

    6. Re:Episode III spoiler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, I might actually pay to see all that. Maybe Lucas should take some notes.

    7. Re:Episode III spoiler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked it too. I bet Lucas is copying it all down right now.

    8. Re:Episode III spoiler by spir0 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      you want sponsorship to make this into a movie lad? I got an email from some guy in nigeria who might just have the cash to pay for this.

      --
      The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.
    9. Re:Episode III spoiler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was good....

  247. and this proves it: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  248. If it comes down to that, I'll do us both by dswensen · · Score: 2

    I've spent more time than I like to think about defending Star Wars on Slashdot over the years, but if he puts Jar Jar in Episode IV, I'm going to drive out to Skywalker Ranch and throttle him with my bare hands.

    Even the most die-hard Star Wars sucker has his limits.

  249. Jar Jar Binks == Darth Sidious by ka9dgx · · Score: 2
    It's readily apparent to me that Jar Jar Binks == Darth Sidious. The evil is very cunning, playing everyone else for a fool with his apparently simpleton ways.

    --Mike--

    1. Re:Jar Jar Binks == Darth Sidious by euxneks · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Thatsa right, feel yousa angah! Strike meesa down and yousa path to duh dahk side will beesa complete!"


      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  250. Darkhorizons dispels the rumor... by blake213 · · Score: 0
    Star Wars: Episode VII: After recent speculation based on what sounded like a misinterpreted quote, George Lucas has finally and clearly ruled out further adventures after 'Jedi'. Lucas told Infobeat that he had PREVIOUSLY CONSIDERED the idea but has since canned it totally - "I thought it might be fun to bring Carrie (Fisher) and Mark (Hammill) and Harrison (Ford) back when they're 65 and make another movie with them. But I'm going to be over 60 when I finish this and it takes 10 years to do a trilogy. I'm not going to spend my last 10 years doing Star Wars". Thanks to 'Trey'.

    -Taken directly from darkhorizons.com
    --
    mund freud.
  251. Changes to Star Wars by totallygeek · · Score: 2
    I think that it is cool that the director is still interested in making his old movies change by revisiting them. Think of how many movies you can't get on VHS or DVD because the director and actors don't want to mess with them. It would be wonderful if these movies were touched up, fixed, or at least released -- especially some of the movies integral to the director or actors' careers.

  252. Other Rumored Changes by OneWeirdFish · · Score: 3, Funny

    Unfortunately, Lucas won't stop at the Special Edition. After the release of Episode III ("Ani, Get Your Gungan") he plans to go back and further modify the original trilogy. Here are a few other of the rumored changes straight from the brain of one weird Fish. Special Special Edition (2008). * Jar Jar is digitally inserted into every scene in Ep4, Ep5, and Ep6. * Stormtroopers carry walkie-talkies instead of blasters. (Hey, they never hit anything important anyway.) * Luke's haircut is made presentable, but now he looks like "Hanson." * Ian McDiarmid replaces Clive Revill in the Emperor-hologram scene in Ep5, except now is a CGI construct less believeable than bikini pinups of Lara Croft. * Han Solo's Special Edition line, "It's all right, I can see a lot better now" is replaced with "It's all right, I never had hibernation sickness, I was only fooling." * Aunt Beru's looped lines are redubbed by Fran Drescher. * The sweeping John Williams asteroid theme is replaced by the music from the 1979 arcade game "Asteroids." Ultra Special Special Edition (2012) * Chewbacca is digitally removed from every shot and replaced with Jar Jar Binks. Han Solo's line "It's not wise to upset a Wookiee" is replaced with "It's not wise to upset a Gungan." * Footage is added of Imperial Academy forces being trained in weapons use by Don Knotts. * Digital lip-sync technology is used to change Luke's line "Nooo-ooo-ooo-oooooo!" into "Yippee!" * To make it more obvious that Senator/Chancellor Palpatine is really the Emperor in disguise, a set of Groucho glasses is added to every shot of the Emperor. To every shot of Palpatine is added a halo. * The Wampa Ice Creature is now a cameo role played by Shaquille O'Neal, complete with musical number and dancing girls in skimpy fur bikinis. The scene goes on tour as the "Wampa Ice Capades." * The entire John Williams score is scrapped and replaced with Pink Floyd's "Dark Side of the Moon." Some fanboys claim it fits with spooky synchronicity in certain scenes, usually after the imbibement of several non-prescription herbal remedies. Incredibly Special Ultra Re-release Special Special Edition (2025) * Jar Jar Binks is made a Jedi Knight. * Jar Jar Binks destroys the Death Star. * Jar Jar Binks is shown to be a cunning and foresighted adversary who allowed himself to be manipulated by Palpatine into proposing legislation to create the Imperial Army. Says Jar Jar in Episode 2, "Revenge of Jar Jar," "Nowsa meesa has a eeeevil Emperor where meesa want!" * Luke Skywalker is digitally erased from the picture and replaced with a member of the 2025 Swedish Bikini Team. * C-3PO is re-dubbed by Dennis Franz, who plays the Brooklyn-born Lt. Sipowicz from "NYPD Blue." * R2-D2 is given the BFG from Doom XII and goes on a rampage in Cloud City to rescue C-3PO's disconnected parts. * Han Solo no longer accidentally activates Boba Fett's jetpack to send him careening into the Sarlacc Pit. Instead, Han indicates that Boba Fett's shoe is untied, whereupon the bounty hunter looks down, trips over his own foot, shoots himself in the neck, gets tangled up in his own grappling hook cord, and says "D'oh!" a la Homer Simpson. Fett then windmills his arms wildly on the edge of the skiff, falls into a batch of wet cement, and explodes with near-nuclear force. Han Solo then quips, "The fool! He doesn't even have shoelaces." * Governor Tarkin, Han Solo, and Jabba the Hutt replaced with an aging Mike Myers doing Dr. Evil, Austin Powers, and Fat Bastard, respectively. The Ewoks are replaced with Mini-Mes.

  253. Jedi Mind Tricks by Royster · · Score: 2

    /me waves a hand mysteriously.

    You remember Jar Jar and Amidala in Episode 3.

    I remember Jar Jar and Amidala in Episode 3.

    You cried when you were 10 and you saw Jar Jar die.

    I cried when I was 10 and I saw Jar Jar die.

    You love Jar Jar and will buy merchandise.

    I love Jar Jar and will buy merchandise.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
  254. A funny take on Star Wars fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go here:

    http://www.northeastsprinkler.com/solf/misc/sw-t ri umph.wmv

    You will probably need windows media player or codeweavers crossover plugin.

  255. New scenes, but no Jar Jar by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 0
    Word is out that new scenes are indeed being shot to be inserted into the original triligy to "fill in the gaps".

    From what I've heard though, they do not involve any major characters - Well ... not any more major than Bail Organa anyway.

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  256. "Nice new clothes, Emperor Lucas" by coltrane679 · · Score: 1

    Wake up, geeks--you're being played for idiots, and you're responding according to form. The whole Star Wars bit is dead, dead, dead--it's boring and BAD, but you continue to suck it up and shell out the dough because Star Wars Inc. has become a geek fetish. Old, uninspired control freak Lucas couldn't be less entertaining or relevant if he tried; all he does is play on the goodwill established by the original films 20 years ago. Move on already and stop being suckers.

  257. Yah, and Donald Trump is a great man, too by DThorne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm so sick and tired of people associating success with talent. Success is driven by a huge number of variables - talent is just one of them. Brittany Spears is successful too - would you iconize her? Give me a break. In Lucas' defence, he did do a couple of good early films(THX and American Grafitti were good), so I think he was a capable director, even smart on occasion. However, he took that long hiatus from films for a reason - he hates doing it. Do you do a good job on things you hate? Over the last 30 years he's lost whatever directing and writing talent he had. Pathetic dialog, childish scenes, stunningly derivative visuals - you have the nerve to call his visual sense "amazing"?! Here's the films he visually stole from for AOTC - The Fifth Element(city car chase), Blade Runner(same sequence, when they come down to the bar), Waterworld/Dune(the hidden cloning planet), Gladiator(the arena scene), and Starship Troopers(the final apocalyptic battle scenes).

    There were indeed some mighty fine FX sequences done for this movie. It was a BAD film, however. It was bad because it was written and directed poorly - I know MacGregor, Lee and Jackson can act(although the lead was another issue!), so there's only two people you can blame - the writer or the director. Hmmm...who was that?

    And give me a break on the "visionary" stuff. If he hadn't made all the money he had in his early years(off American Grafitti and SW), then he would have gone bust after a year and no-one would have heard of him again. It was throwing more and more money at ILM that kept it going. If he hadn't of done it, then someone else would have. Period. Why do so many people worship money? There are hundreds, nay thousands of people over history that just kept pouring more and more money after something they thought was "neat". Some ended up being successful, and are "visionaries". Others died penniless and are "losers".

    You'd think the average Slashdotter would have a little less respect for corporate sucess as a measure of quality.

    DT

    1. Re:Yah, and Donald Trump is a great man, too by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      totally agree... well said

  258. Four eyes by hokanomono · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I want to recommend the Movie Tokyo Eyes to you. The story will remind you of your experience, as your post reminds me of the movie, and finally Hinano Yoshikawa is cute, although i would not suggest her as a substitute to Natalie or even Jar Jar Portman. Anyway, Padme is married to Anakin.. so who will be the lovely princess in Episode III?

    --
    This sig is a true statement, but I cannot prove it.
  259. Open letter to George Lucas by erik_fredricks · · Score: 1

    Dear George,

    I'm writing as one of the hundreds of thousands of people who have made you a very rich man.

    We grew up on the Star Wars trilogy. It was a part of our childhood. We've spent untold millions of our hard-earned dollars on your franchise, and for the last few years, you've been ripping us off, knowing that we'll put up with it.

    The Phantom Menace proved that you can no longer write or direct. It was a let-down and a betrayal. We waited twenty-five years for a new movie, and all we got was this stupid Jar-Jar t-shirt. We're starting to feel the burn.

    When you announced that we'd have to wait until sometime around 2005 for DVDs for the original trilogy, we grumbled but didn't scream. Now we're screaming. Do not screw with the original trilogy any more!

    You milked us good with the "Special Editions" once, and now you're talking about doing it again. Don't. Please.

    This is what we want:

    1) The original trilogy, NOT the special editions, on DVD.

    2) A cleaned-up print and remastered soundtrack.

    3) If nothing else, at least the documentaries for each film included on each disc.

    How hard could this be? If the studios can crank out dubious "collector's editions" for every summer movie that comes down the pipe, you can do this. You know we'll pay whatever ridiculous price you charge for it, even if we're beginning to feel shafted.

    --

    --

    THE GOOD HUMOR MAN CAN ONLY BE PUSHED SO FAR
    Bart Simpson on chalkboard in episode 2F18

    1. Re:Open letter to George Lucas by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      > 1) The original trilogy, NOT the special editions, on DVD.

      No, what I want is the original trilogy AND the special edition on DVD.

      I'd also like to see TPM with the "deleted scenes" edited back in (especially the pod race starting grid scene)

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  260. Nine movies as far back as Empire... by matthewd · · Score: 1

    A sidebar in the Time magazine issue that featured TESB laid out the nine movie plan. At some point around 1980 he had a nine movie plan (probably once he realized he had the clout and resources to do it). Whether Lucas had the nine movies in mind from the very beginning is debatable.

    However, I would not even try to debate that he at least had the "galactic backstory" in mind when writing ANH, even it he didn't plan on making those movies at that point. There are clear references to it in both the movie (eg Clone Wars) and the novelisation (references to the Emperor's rise to power). Surely some of the backstory has been refined to a certain degree (for instance the novel speaks of the Emperor using commercial/industrial elements to rise to power, but then came under the control of those same elements, clearly not the case as seen in ROTJ).

    1. Re:Nine movies as far back as Empire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A sidebar in the Time magazine issue that featured TESB laid out the nine movie plan. At some point around 1980 he had a nine movie plan (probably once he realized he had the clout and resources to do it)."

      I remember that too. I seriously doubt that Lucas had even thought of Vader being Luke's father at the time Episode 4 was filmed. That's the simplest explanation for all the continuity problems. I never bought into the "from a certain point of view" cop-out.

    2. Re:Nine movies as far back as Empire... by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      I disagree- if you look at Kenobi's face when he tells Luke about the death of his father (in the scene in Ben's hut) he looks like he is hiding something. Watch it again, you'll see what I mean.

      graspee

    3. Re:Nine movies as far back as Empire... by IxnayOnTheIxnay · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt that Lucas had even thought of Vader being Luke's father at the time Episode 4 was filmed

      Then it's coincidence that "Vader" is Dutch for "father"?

  261. Star wars is like microsoft by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 3, Funny

    When they had no money, the quality was "better". As they progressively get more money, quality dives, to the point of purposefully going back and wrecking the few things they did have right in order to increase profits. Imagine Star wars Episode IV version 3.1B... if they had to re-release the movie 5 or 6 times to make all the necessary adjustments for the series to actually flow together. Imagine Star Wars controlling 45% of the movie market, fighting off monopoly lawsuits left and right, and a director that owns an island somewhere in a galaxy far far away...
    sir_haxalot

    --
    stuff |
  262. Um George can you explain this one away? by ShieldWolf · · Score: 2

    "[C-3P0's] memory system has been erased, and so has R2's," Lucas told the site. "So they don't remember anything from the first trilogy. I'm telling you something from Episode III, but I shouldn't be telling you that, but I think most of the fans already know that."

    What about Owen Lars?!?!?! He apparently worked with a droid named C-3PO for a few years and then doesn't recognize him 20 years later wtf???

    --
    just = (My)Opinion.toCents();
  263. Re:Not 9 Movies. No, really. Just 6. by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 0
    George's original concept for the series has changed quite a bit from the original. Here is an exerpt from the notes of Gary Kurtz (original producer for parts IV and V, a man I hope George works with again). It outlines the original plots for the non-ology. They were written up before RotJ as you will see.

    EPISODE 1: Was to focus on the origins of the Jedi Knights and how they are initiated and trained

    EPISODE 2: Introduction and development of Obi-Wan Kenobi

    EPISODE 3: Introduction and life of Vader

    EPISODE 4: There were seven different drafts of the film. At one point, they pursued buying the rights to Hidden Fortress because of the strong similarities. At one point, Luke was a female, Han was Luke's brother, Luke's father was the one in prison (interesting point for some debates) and the film featured 40 wookies

    EPISODE 5: Once written, the screenplay of Empire is almost exactly what is seen on screen. The only cut scenes were those involving wampas in the rebel base (cut because of time and unsolved technical glitches) and about two minutes of Luke/Yoda Jedi training with no real dialog.

    EPISODE 6: Leia was to be elected "Queen of her people" leaving her isolated. Han was to die. Luke confronted Vader and went on with his life alone. Leia was not to be Luke's sister.

    EPISODE 7: Third trilogy was to focus on Luke's life as a Jedi, with very few details planned out.

    EPISODE 8: Luke's sister (not Leia) appears from another part of the galaxy.

    EPISODE 9: First appearance of the Emperor.

    These may have appeared before, I'm not sure. But it's interesting never the less.

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  264. Really 8 movies in the saga by roberto0 · · Score: 1
    1. The Ewok Adventure
    2. Ewoks: The Battle for Endor
    Funny how noboy ever counts these. Or is it that you don't want to remember?
    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, simulate.
  265. So, he's going to fuck up the original Star Wars by dh003i · · Score: 2

    So, let me get this straight, not only is Lucas destroying the Star Wars legacy by the laughable Ep I and II (though Ep III may be better if he doesn't fuck up Darth Vader), but now, he's also going to destroy the original Star Wars by "redoing it"? This is turning into a more shameless franchise than Jaws was. And you don't see Spielbeg, now, more than a decade later, going back and trying to squeeze more money out of Jaws, do you? No. He certainly could justify it -- after all, modern special effects could make it look realistic by today's standards. But, because he has some class, he's chosen not to fuck with a good thing.

    Lucas, however, displays no such class.

    Star Wars IV - VI were brilliant, great movies. But lets face it, Lucas was a 3-hit wonder. What other movies has Lucas made that are worth watching? Certainly not Star Wars I or II.

  266. augh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sweet holy CHRIST you people are pathetic.

  267. What about Owen and Beru? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I suppose their memories get wiped too? Apparently, this is the case, because they don't remember C-3PO and R2D2 from Anakin's Episode II visit when the Jawas sell the droids back to them in Episode IV. George sucks at plot consistency...

    1. Re:What about Owen and Beru? by euxneks · · Score: 1

      First Owen actor: Uhh.. Mr. Lucas? I know this is only a small part and all, but if Uncle Owen knows C3PO in his early days, how come he doesn't recognize C3PO in... -

      Lucas: Next!

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  268. A new movie guideline by Phartx2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Today I declare that Natalie Portman should be in every movie produced from this day forward!

    (the masses rejoice)

    -Jim

  269. This was on the Force . NET too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont think the Natalie Portman part is a rumor, its fact. I saw it on the Force.net.
    The Jar JAr part however is not on theforce.net.

  270. My buddy shawn's opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My buddy shawn thinks that Jar Jar Binks should not be in episode four.

    That is all.

    1. Re:My buddy shawn's opinion by euxneks · · Score: 1

      You know shawn too?!!??
      Gee what a small world.

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  271. Updating continuity: a mammoth task? by IroygbivU · · Score: 1

    Now that we are aware that the bulk of the Empire's army is made up of Jango Fetts, is Lucas going to redub all of their voices for eps 4 through 6?

    Sounds like a lot of work to me!

  272. Excuse me! by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I think you're way off base. That should be "bloated meglomanic and the huge, critical fanbase that throws money at him."

    Which really makes it all the more interesting.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  273. Knock Knock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    (knock knock )
    ( Door opens )
    artist: Hi, my name is john, I painted the picture thats hanging in your living room.

    owner: what can I do for you?

    artist: well, after thinking about it for a while, I though a few changes might be in order. I just don't feel its really done.

    owner: Well... I like it just the way it is...

    artist: I'm the artist, its my right!

    owner: well ok....

    ( Paint, Paint, Paint )

    artist: There, I added a few things to the painting of that nebula. A planet, a sun, a few moons,...

    owner: I guess its looks a little better...

    ( a few years later )
    (knock knock)

    artist: Hi again remember me?

    owner: yea, what now?

    artist: I did some more thinking....

    owner: yea just get it done....

    ( a few years later )
    (knock knock )

    artist: well I kinda fudged the last time and....

    owner: get it over with and get out!

    ( a few years later )

    artist: Man you know, I just had this ich and....

    owner: GOOD GOD MAN, leave me alone!

    artist: its my right....

    ( paint, paint, paint )

    artist: I'm all done with your Lama!

    owner: I bought a paint of a nebula a few years back, which I liked, AND YOU"VE TURNED IT INTO A LAMA, WHICH I HATE!!!!??!?!

    ( sound of painting breaking over artists head and artist going out the second story window, never to return )

  274. Missed one... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    11) Jar-Jar replaces dianoga in trash compactor.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  275. Episodes 4-6 already changed and for the better! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all this 'how dare he change Episodes 4-6' blah blah, try to find a scene in the remastered editions thats NOT changed in some way already!

    either new aliens added in scenes, ship/city models redone digitally or laser effects... either way they sure look far less dated than an equivalent age James Bond film, for example. Other than the clearly 70's haircuts they could pass as modern films!

  276. Episode inconsistency by Dag+Maggot · · Score: 0, Troll



    When Annakin reunites with C3p0 on the farm in Episode II, c3p0 has obviously spent years there languishing through
    Anakin's adolelesence, so why is that when C3p0 goes to the farm AGAIN in episode IV, he doesn't recognise it? I think
    it's a fairy large plot hole that could be filled with some revisionist history on Episode IV.

    Maybe C3p0 takes a blaster
    hit which fries his memory, while escaping from the Emperial Ship , or maybe the Jawa's wipe it.

    --

    I have no pants and I must scream

    1. Re:Episode inconsistency by euxneks · · Score: 1

      I thik you should also note that uncle Owen doesn't recognize C3po in ANH..

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    2. Re:Episode inconsistency by Dag+Maggot · · Score: 1

      That's a good point, I guess the memory wipe Idea wouldn't work for him, still -a lot of time has passed, I suppose it's plausible that Uncle Owen may have forgotten about this particular droid. Human's have been known to make mistakes... from time to time...

      --

      I have no pants and I must scream

  277. Directors and the industry by A.Soze · · Score: 1

    It is a long standing aphorism in the film business that films are never finished, simply taken away from their creators. In this case, apparently the creator has enough money and power to keep it as long as he likes... And I have to agree with the previous poster, it's beginning to seem that ANH and Empire were the flukes. Ever see Howard The Duck?

    --
    "Goodness, how did you people live long enough to invent tools?" -Hobbes (the tiger, not the philosopher)
  278. Star Wars does Star Trek by kireK · · Score: 1

    First there was Enterprise A-E

    Now...

    Starwars IV-VI A-C

    Ugh...

  279. Lucas has Ridley Scott's Blade Runner Syndrome... by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 1

    There are like 600 different versions of Blade Runner... Lucas isn't there yet, but it wouldn't surprise me if he was headed in that direction. I wonder how he plans on fitting Howard the Duck into the new Indiana Jones film...

    --
    sig.
  280. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  281. Lucas vs Raimi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (There is no thesis to this post, just some observations...)

    When Sam Raimi gets better funding and decides to make Evil Dead 2 -- which is, let's face it, basically the same movie as Evil Dead -- we understand. Lucas should do the same thing: put version numbers after the movies, to reflect that he's redoing them now that he has infinite money and newer technlogy. So then you'd have Star Wars 1, Star Wars 2, and Star Wars 3 -- not episode numbers, just version number for ANH. Likewise, Empire 1, Empire 2, etc.

    Raimi doesn't suppress Evil Dead 1. You can still get tapes of that. Lucas isn't approaching it the same way.

  282. He won't release the original versions by Quazi · · Score: 1

    He won't release the first version on DVD because he knows no one would buy the edited version. He needs to justify the fact that he put all his time & effort into screwing around with it and showing off his screwing-around skillz...

    $.02

  283. no not the empire troops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    as the lore has always gone, the clone wars were a specific period of time and were well over by the time our young whiny friend Luke came along. The empire's troops are not made up of these troops anymore, as there is really no need. Remember the premise that the clones were comparable to droids. This was to basically obtain a crap load of trained troops in a relatively short time (5 years but total of 10 since the research, selection and genetic remapping was done). This all while there is no real standing army of the republic as a whole (remember they are a confederation). Now with these emergency powers acts which will not be relinquished obviously, the soon to be emperor will simply use regular people and train them to replace the clones.

    However, many books eluded to the training of storm troopers as being different than the usual break-grind-build routine that is so sucessful. The empire actually alters the mental states through various psycho-physical methods as chemically induced hypnotic suggestion throughout training. What you end up with are machines, but with the reasoning of humans (and thus superior adaptability).

    So, basically unless Lucas decides to 'rewrite' the entire premise (which I realize is hinted at from this post) then it would serve nothing to change voices and such.

    Here is a question for you though... why Jango? Besides the cashcow tie in to Boba Fett, would it not have made more sense to clone several people of differing abilities. Have some meaty fellows for the heavy shit, some medium guys for normal infantry, and lighter ones for special operations and strike missions. I always thought from the descriptions of Boba Fett's skills (and looking at Jango's... not to shabby) that he had 'Jedi' reflexes. Remember that like intellect, you can benefit from raw ability through trial and error training. That bastard was fast and very accurate and seemed a match for most Jedi. (Not Jules though... NO ONE puts the hurt on a Force empowered Jules) I still think Windu should drop his credit chit holder and we should get a flash of it having 'Bad MOther Fucker' on it.

  284. The way I heard it, Julia Roberts perform the role by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 1

    As the grown up Padme.

  285. FUCK YOU. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Faggot.

  286. Let's check out Natalie's tits -- shall we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry but, this is "on topic" (in a round about sort of way. They mentioned Natalie Portman. I started thinking about her perky nipples in Episode 2. And, so I'm posting a picture of her topless: http://members.fortunecity.com/oops59/natalie_port man2301003.jpg Enjoy!

  287. I love sssssssssstttttar wars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dress as boba fett.

    LUCAS IS MY GOD!!!

  288. Divorce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Depending on the attachments that robotic hand has she may dump Anakin and fight for custody of the hand. :-)

  289. A better title for the rumor would be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... "Jedi inserted into Portman"

    HA! I KILL ME!

  290. So what? by Rewd · · Score: 1

    Who cares if new versions of the (old) episodes get made? I don't understand the negative reaction. The existing versions STILL EXIST. Keep watching those if you must watch Star Wars over and over again. Sheesh.

    I say bring on the new stuff!

  291. The "Abused" analogy is accurate... by The_THOMAS · · Score: 1

    Possibly the most insightful analysis of Star Wars fans I've ever seen.

    And for those of you labelling the poster insensative to battered partners, the fact is that a majority of abused partners (men and women) do return to their abusers many times. This poster is simply using this fact in an affective observation. So chill.

    --
    Ya Sure! You Betcha!, The_THOMAS
  292. Cheap way to extend copyright forever by Reziac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Every time you release an altered version of a previously copyrighted work, you can claim a NEW copyright. So if ANH gets re-edited and re-released in 2002, it gets a fresh copyright date -- 2002 -- without having to actually be a new work from scratch.

    I'm not sure of the legal standing of this wrt to the original version, but for practical purposes it's probably effective as a method to extend copyright forever.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    1. Re:Cheap way to extend copyright forever by tempfile · · Score: 1

      Aw, come on. Thanks to Disney's retroactive lawmaking mere 25 years of difference won't really matter any more in a few years.

    2. Re:Cheap way to extend copyright forever by Reziac · · Score: 2

      True... but I think where this is ultimately headed is that eventually (and it may take decades to get there) there will be NO privately held copyrights -- copyright will be strictly a corporate concept, and ALL privately-created works that expect to get paid for it will be considered "works for hire".

      It sucks, but that's clearly what the **AA are aiming to achieve.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  293. LEAVE THE FILMS THE WAY THEY WERE! by spoco2 · · Score: 1
    Oh god how I wish films would be left the way they were... I really do.

    As George is doing his best to ensure the only versions of the original trilogy that you can buy are his newly 'enhanced' or 'revamped' ones, there are less and less ways of getting one's hands on a damn nice copy of the three films untouched.

    Why do I care?

    Because films are like little historical documents in a sense... while they are fantasy, SciFi in particular, they also show us what filmaking was capable of at the time they were made... by adding computer effects, new scenes etc. you are taking away from this. Rather than us having a collection of films that have absolutely breathtaking special effects, set design, costumes etc. for their time (Which still hold up amazingly well), we are left with an augmented patchwork of bits of the original films with effects 'repaired' and 'enhanced'... no longer can we marvel at how well they did things back then, instead we are left with only a feeling of 'my, wasn't that crap CGI they added there'... 'oh how I enjoyed it so much better before'.

    Having had that little tirade, I'm all for restoration of films... clean up the prints, remaster the sound so we can hear it again... hell, even have a director's cut... BUT LET US STILL SEE THE ORIGINAL... go ape making a new version of the film... but please continue to give us access to the original...

    Even if just so that film students still have something to study....

    Oh well... Being so late in the day for this post, this won't be read, but I feel better for having vented. :)

  294. The problem with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is that it will inspire other directors to do the same. What's worse is that they might not be satisfied with one edit. Could you imaging four or five different editions of any episode of Star Wars floating around? It would be insanity. To get up to date on what is really going on, you have to cough up the dough for four or five DVDs. That's the real problem, especially in Star Wars's case. The fans are so utterly devoted, that they will buy all the editions. Other directors, as stated above, will be induced to edit their movies. Of course, this motivation will be drived by greed, not creativity or the quest for perfection. In the end, most of these edits will be crappy, studios will lose tons of money, and we will have to pay more for DVDs than we already do. Let me put it in terms you can understand. Imagine that every time a new kernel came out, you had to pay $20 for it. Well, that's not exactly appropriate, but it's similar. In the end, I believe, this will be bad for the consumer.

    Of course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong.

  295. The horror by kitzilla · · Score: 1

    Opening scene in SW IV: how Jar Jar became the evil Emperor.

    *shudder*

    Could happen.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  296. Re:Not 9 Movies. No, really. Just 6. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Trek continued after Roddenberry died. There could be more movies set in the Star Wars univerise after ROTJ done by someone else (with Lucas's permission).

  297. FWIW... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
    The movies have been changed a lot already - and not just with the Special Editions. There were several versions of A New Hope alone prior to the SE (although most of the differences were minor in comparison to the new changes made for it). First of all, when the film came out back in May of '77, there were three different sound mixes - ones for 70 mm, 35 mm Dolby Stereo, and 35 mm mono - each of which not only had different emphasis and prominence given some sounds, lines of dialogue, etc., but which had actual sounds and lines unique to itself - lines of dialogue heard only in one mix, or alternate sounds in another, and so on. Then of course, when Empire came out, the first film was given a whole new title - it had indeed originally been just Star Wars (after all, it hadn't been known until the film was released that it would be successful enough to sustain sequels). When the film was first shown and then reissued in '78 and '79, it was Star Wars; after Star Wars - Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back came out in 1980, the original was reissued in 1981 as Star Wars - Episode IV: A New Hope.

    Meanwhile, Empire was undergoing changes itself. The postproduction crunch was so great that there weren't just sounds but actual visuals that differed between the 70 mm and 35 mm prints. They weren't major, of course, but there were lots of little things like scene transitions being straight cuts in one version and wipes or dissolves in the other, certain visual effects elements being composited differently (or not at all - for example, the Millennium Falcon's dish antenna is visible in the frame beside Luke when he falls from the weather vane in one version but not in the other), and so on, as well as different sound effects here and there. Not only that, but there was an additional effects shot or two finished just as the film was released: some of the establishing material of the rebel fleet at the end, with the Falcon docked on the medical frigate, wasn't originally there. It was decided that it wasn't sufficiently clear where the Falcon was and where the characters were in relation to each other, so well beyond the last minute ILM was called in to provide this tiny snippet of additional visuals; it was then edited into the last reel of the movie, and prints of that reel were then struck and sent out to theaters to replace the original reel. It took a couple (few?) weeks to replace them all, so depending on where one lived, one could conceivably have gone to see the movie four times in the first month it was released, and seen four different versions.

    Also, for whatever reason, the 70 mm prints of Return of the Jedi didn't use at the beginning the new recording of the Main Title theme that John Williams had recorded along with the rest of the Jedi score, but used the minutely different recording made for Empire three years earlier (it's an extremely minor difference, and probably undetectable to most people, but there it is).

    Star Wars was something of a moving target even once it hit video; the earliest videos ever released of the original movie don't feature part of one of Threepio's lines in the Death Star control room regarding the tractor beam. Most later editions featured this line (taken from one of the different mixes described above), although it was absent again on the new mix created for the THX remasters done in 1993 for a laserdisc boxed set (recycled in 1995 for VHS). This mix also featured several other sonic differences from the previous video releases, BTW (listen to the different sounds made by the debris of Alderaan as it hits the Falcon in the different versions). All this, and everything else above, happened before the Special Editions.

    Those clamoring for a different version of The Phantom Menace might be interested to know, if they don't already, that the DVD version has been expanded a bit with some cool additional material in the pod race and in establishing shots on Coruscant. The running time is probably a minute and a half longer or so. Of course, it's nothing of real consequence, and doesn't address any of the movie's real flaws, but it does add to the movie (if only a tiny, little, inconsequential bit). Who knows whether he's done with it, though...

    Moreover, getting away from Star Wars, when THX-1138 came out in 1971, the studio made changes to Lucas's cut (as studios do); when the film was rereleased in 1978 (after you-know-what had made Lucas a household name), Lucas was able to get the studio to put back the material, and the reissue featured what would surely have been called a "director's cut" had the term been in vogue. The '71 cut was 88 minutes; in '78, it was more like 93. The same thing happened with American Graffiti - when this '73 film was reissued in '78, the newly cloutful Lucas restored three scenes deleted from the '73 cut. All home video versions of American Graffiti have had this longer cut, although for some reason all video versions of THX-1138 revert to the shorter studio cut; the 1978 reissue has been the only way to see the longer version to date. Not only that, but for the 25th anniversary of Graffiti Lucas digitally altered the opening shot of Mel's Diner at the very beginning - the sky now has sunset-streaked clouds (compare an old, pre-1998 VHS or laserdisc of the movie with the recent VHS and DVD release - it's the first shot at the beginning, after the Universal and Lucasfilm logos).

    Need more? Lucas has reedited all the episodes of The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles to meld each chronologically-adjacent pair into a two-hour-ish "movie," in some cases adding considerable quantities of footage to do so (much of it newly shot; reportedly, the youngest Indy, Corey Carrier, who plays Indy at ages 8 to 10 or so, has been digitally shrunk and reproportioned to resemble his visual age at the time the series was originally made). That's not to mention different versions of Young Indy to begin with, with one episode having originally had different sets of "bookends" (the framing sequences with an older Indy reminiscing about his experiences).

    The point is: GL has been tinkering with and reworking his stuff for decades. It's nothing new. To me, the only issue is whether his changes are for better or worse; I have to say that most of the stuff I'm seeing rumors of now would suck, as do many of the changes made for the SEs. However, in all honesty, a lot of the alterations he's made to his work - in the SW SEs and elsewhere - really are worthwhile. Is the SE better than the original, overall? No, and neither are the new films as good as the old (although AotC is at least a real improvement over TPM), and that's the problem. Simply put, I think Lucas lost a lot of his creative faculties back around 1993; his creative decisions since then have largely been bad, where the ones before weren't. Argh, and oh well. I hope he regains whatever he lost. We'll see.

    (Oh, and god help me for actually knowing all this stuff - I'm such a geek. If only there were someplace I could go - some sort of common gathering place for others like me - where geeks can speak freely, and converse with others of their ilk...)

  298. Analogy with food by Pyrosophy · · Score: 1

    Of course it's his intellectual property, and he's allowed to make any changes he wants. But that doesn't mean he'll change it for the better. There are better and worse works of art, you know.

    My friends are allowed to put ketchup on their cornflakes in the morning -- this doesn't mean I shouldn't advise them it would be a really bad idea.

  299. What I am really looking forward to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A long time ago, there was a movie called Looker where they used computerized people.

    I am just waiting for the new release of Star Wars on DVD where they completely redo the movie in total CGI, similar to Final Fantasy.

    Think about it, the story/scenes can be updated to match the newest movies and they can sell more copies of the first three movies.

    Just an idea.

  300. Re:Changes? Good, let me tell you why by bhuff · · Score: 1

    I think the issue of viewing order of each trilogy is a tough call. On one hand, when all the movies are done, it would be nice to have a coherent story ark accross all six movies as if they had been created in that order.

    However, the dramatic effect of events unfolding in the first trilogy is really what makes that series. You remove a lot of tension in the story line if you know ahead of time who sired whom, etc. I believe that the movies will always have to be watched 4-6 then 1-3 the first time to get the full effect of the story.

    Its not unheard of, hell, Tarantino messes with beginnings and endings within an individual movie, let alone between movies.

    -Ben Huff

  301. Re:Changes? Good, let me tell you why by GuruDino · · Score: 1

    HEY!!! It's story telling!!!! Use your friggin imagination to fill in the blanks, not an entire rewrite of everything!!! get a grip... I still say it sucked

  302. I have no problem with changing things... by Wierd+Willy · · Score: 1

    One of the big surprises when the first star wars came out was the fact that it was hugely successful. The cast and writing teams were blown away by the total success of the project. It would seem to me that adding characters to the originals and re-editing the whole progression to make it more like a whole story, rather rather than a group of individual viniettes would do the story nothing but good.

    and hey, I liked jar-jar, dammit. If I had a tongue like his I'd never leave the house....

    --
    Stupid Humans.....
  303. Its just a photo of mom by WTarrasque · · Score: 1

    All he's probably gonna do is show a little clip of Natalie Portman in an upset mother stage after Anakin does something terrible to leave her and she has to hide the children before she dies of grief. It'll be a short clip, nothing bad there. What's wrong with Jar-Jar? He's a comic relief, but he's required!

    --
    Sometimes I'm told, "People suck!" I often respond, "You're a people!" I'm a people, too.
  304. Agreed by WTarrasque · · Score: 1

    I disagree with the tongue thing, but I like Jar-Jar because its more than a single dimension humanoid. I like seeing idiots succeed in life. Perhaps its a selfish concept, though.

    --
    Sometimes I'm told, "People suck!" I often respond, "You're a people!" I'm a people, too.
  305. Jeez, have an imagination by WTarrasque · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    He's a protocol droid. How many others are in all the Star Wars movies? How many would there be otherwise? HUNDREDS! THOUSANDS! AT LEAST ONE FOR EACH LANGUAGE! It does say in the article that Lucas says his memory is fried. In Star Wars novels, C3P0 and R2D2 have many many many adventures on their own, going from owner to amazingly crazy owner. Its not hard to imagine neither recognize each other. And R2D2 is only recognizable because Lucas makes him so, cause you don't see a lot of other R2/R4 units that are blue and round.

    --
    Sometimes I'm told, "People suck!" I often respond, "You're a people!" I'm a people, too.
  306. I liked Jar Jar by Ranger · · Score: 1

    If Jar Jar wasn't in Episode I, you would have noticed how annoying Annikin was. Since Jar Jar had such a minimal role in Episode II. C3PIO filled the role of the annoying character admirably.

    Did anyone else notice how perky Natalie Portman looked in the tight white outfit that later had a Captain-Kirk-gets-his-shirt-ripped-off maneuver done to it to expose her tummy?

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  307. Oh, please! by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2
    Padme is dead - Leia tells Luke that her natural mother died when Leia was very young. Jar-Jar dies in the next movie, I'm sure. I'm not a Jar-Jar basher; it's just how I see the story coming about:

    Obi-wan, with pregnant Padme in tow, is running away from a pre-armored Darth Vader. Jar-Jar's optimism, and just general childishness, comes into play and he tries to talk, Gungan to man, to Vader...and Vader cuts him down in cold blood. I think, once the next movie is over, we will all be thankful that TPM was as light as it was...

    My predictions for added scenes/shots? Bail Organa (Jimmy Smits) on Alderaan just before it is destroyed, and Qui-gon Jinn being dropped into the end of ROTJ alongside Anakin, Yoda and Obi-wan.

    When will they be released? I suspect 2007, the 30th anniversary of the first movie. I can see TPM in February, AOTC in March, III in April, ANH in May (the true 30th ann.), ESB in June, ROTJ in July. Then the full set, at least two discs per movie (plus two or three bonus discs) released in a DVD box set in October or November of 2007.

    And then, I think, that will be it. Lucas will move on to other things and the stories will be done...

  308. where Lucas could put Jar Jar in IV by gabec · · Score: 1
    it just occurred to me that the best place for lucas to consider putting a jar-jar like character would be in the tavern when we're introduced to Han Solo. (Mos Eisley?) I've always thought that the bar scene was the most ghetto-style looking part of IV..

    the idea was to show a large number of interacting species in a small area, but half of them looked so... crappy. I for one would be perfectly happy with his changing that scene into CGI. of course, the problem with current CGI is that unless you're doing CGI of a robot or something inorganic (...) the subject doesn't really look like he's part of the environment. this is especially so when you go to "dirty" areas, like a grimey saloon (as opposed to sterile environments). but.. whatever.

    Anyway, the jar jar character could simply be part of a quick pan-by of all the different aliens...

    I think the worst part of the jar jar character isn't the character himself. it's having to put up with shouts and boos when you're trying to watch a damned movie you just paid $8 to see! At Ep2 every time any scene with JJB came on screen you wouldn't be able to hear what was happening because of all the sound effects from the crowd. Sure, no one likes him, but Lucas obviously has taken the criticism personally to the character and isn't planning on removing him any time soon, so ... deal. :/

  309. Star Wars is like 1984 by PacoTaco · · Score: 1

    It requires a lot of doublethink to keep all of the events of the Star Wars universe straight, but I have faith in the fans! They'll be perfectly able to rationalize Jar Jar's surprise appearance in EP 4, while at the same time believing that he was never really there...

  310. Re:May not be that bad. (MINOR SPOILERS) by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

    He still didn't "get it" though. People didn't hate Jar Jar because he was a half-witted idiot, IMO. C3PO was just as bad in his own way - a constantly pessimistic robot who never did anything to advance the plot but translate for his intelligent counterpart.

    People hated Jar Jar because of the way he was allowed to dominate scenes. I don't want pure "comedy" scenes in my adventure movies. It completely breaks the flow. In the first three movies, C3PO's comments were integrated into the action. He never dominated the conversation or the action, as Jar Jar did in the first movie.

    Which brings me to why Lucas still doesn't get it. In episode 2, C3PO dominates the screen with "comedy" with his own stupid sub-plot about his head getting replaced with a killer-droid's. It was the one horrific wish-I-weren't-there part of the movie. Especially with lines like "I feel beside myself". While it was much better, C3PO was still the "Jar Jar" of Episode 2.

  311. CG took the 'industrial' out of ILM by ph8ts2l · · Score: 1

    Why screw with the first trilogy (ep. 4-6) at all? These movies are valuable as-are, showing how the state-of-the-art in filmmaking was changed during their initial runs. They have a tougher ambience than episodes I and II, which I think comes from the DIY special effects Lucas & Co. had to devise.

    A teacher of mine once said that true creativity manifests when faced with a challenge -- not necessarily when you have all the tools you want at your disposal. The muppet Yoda and other creatures, for instance, require less suspension of belief on my part to watch and enjoy than the CG characters and scenes, quite like the difference between hearing old, bass-drenched vinyl LPs and the tinny sound of compact discs.

  312. Did anyone see... by syusuf · · Score: 1

    They showed ROTJ on TV here (in Australia) just before the release of AOTC - in the very last scenes, when all the fireworks are going off, they also show fireworks going off over Coruscant - did anyone else see that?

  313. he already did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He screwed up Han Solo's character completely when he switch Ep IV from Han shooting first to Greedo shooting first. Stupid. It turns Han from a real rogue who makes his way in life by staying one step ahead of the law into a misunderstood man who just suffers from a few bad breaks in life.

    Other than that, I agree with you completely. Lucas lucked into 3 good movies and he's done everything he can since then to try to screw that up too.

  314. George Lucas ate my balls!!! by Agh · · Score: 1

    ...let's change the title of this post to that. ;)

    --
    fuzzball|root:~ # whatis Windows Windows: nothing appropriate.
  315. STOP PRESS - Lucas To Rewrite Bible by Carrot007 · · Score: 1

    After being contacted by church eldars to help improve the church's image to the yonung, mr lucas has decided to rewrite the bible.

    He was unable to be contacted for comment but his press office released this, "Mr Lucas thinks that Jar-Jar will fir it perfectally, you'll never belive who he fathers!"

    ----.

    Bwah ha haaaaa.

    --
    +----------------- | What is the question!
    1. Re:STOP PRESS - Lucas To Rewrite Bible by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      > Mr Lucas thinks that Jar-Jar will fir it perfectally, you'll never belive who he fathers
      If it's a bible, he won't "father", he'll "beget".

      (And, for the record, I actually LIKE Jar Jar.)

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  316. Rumours... by JimPooley · · Score: 2

    Look. These are rumours, which originate on Aint It Cool News - or as an SF journalist of my acquaintance calls it, "Ain't It Complete Shit Harry Just Made Up".

    Talk to me when the DVDs are actually released...

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  317. senate and emperor changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Maybe they'll insert a senate scene into episode IV - so we'll get to see the emperor disolving the senate. I'm not saying I want to see that, but it seems an easy and obvious thing to do - no need to recreate sets or actors looks from that film.

    I also imagine they'll get Ian McDiarmid to redo the emporer's bits in episode V, replacing Clive Revill's voice and whoever that chimp-eyed green-painted woman was that did the visual.

  318. Don't forget "Roots" by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
    that was fairly epic.

    The mahabarat has been reinterpreted for thousands of years, from books to comics to television, and you say stage versions also. Star wars has nice background stories, but it does not come close.

  319. The original plan for 9 films... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was to have the emperor die in episode IX. This idea was scrapped with Episode V.

    Since the emperor dies now in episode VI, any episode past VI would not make the series more complete, but attach something unnatural to it. So stick with it - there won't be any more episodes.

  320. star wars has always sucked by yetisalmon · · Score: 1

    why would anyone want to enjoy something that george lucas made. he's a greedy and stupid bastard businessman. star wars has always been lame......think about it...

  321. Sad but true, by Lispy · · Score: 1

    hes right. Where are th modpoints when i need them...

  322. Natalie Portman inserted... by Te1waz · · Score: 1

    Trying to avoid being as crude as possible, but,

    I'd have thought most of the /. regulars would prefer to have the verb 'inserted' and Natalie Portman in an entirely different context.

    --
    From my Autobiography - "Lifestyles of the Sad and Desperate"...
  323. Re: Stupid Star Wars nerds - Triumph special (OT) by Kyril · · Score: 1

    If you go to Jar-Jar-dum, you will die.

  324. Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The original's copyright will not be extended of course. Copyright only applies to new works.

  325. What about L�on? by Aapje · · Score: 1

    But she did suck in the Star Wars movies, but that's probably Lucas's fault. I think he has a Actor Distortion Field* or something like that.

    *Like Steve Jobs' Reality Distortion Field.

    --

    The Drowned and the Saved - Primo Levi
  326. Originals only on VHS? NOT! Try some LD action. by fallen1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know I'm posting way late and I know there is no hope for modding up but I had to comment on the error in this post, to wit: The _original_ films now only exist as worn VHS tapes. You are most incorrect as they also exist in digital form via LaserDisc and I for one am very happy I have all three in their unedited, unchanged, unaltered format.

    --

    Dream as if you'll live forever.
    Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
    ~Anonymous~

  327. If he's going to change something... by sirgoran · · Score: 1

    Can he do more with the scene in SW:VI ROTJ with Leia in the gold bikini?

    -Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  328. Lucas Interview on www.audible.com by doublem · · Score: 2

    YES! This is the one and only way I would like to see Jar-Jar added to "A New Home."

    Burn the &(*$ to a crisp. YES! DIE JAR-JAR DIE!

    www.audible.com has an interview with Lucas (Robin Williams conducts the interview) in the "free" section where he talks about why Jar-Jar is so hated. He snorts and says "Fans don't like comic side kicks. They hated C3PO and they hated Yoda." He makes it pretty clear that he sees the Jar-Jar haters as being low life scum unworthy of licking the bantha dung off his shoe.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  329. 6: no matter; 4: disaster by carlsefni · · Score: 1

    Well, adding Natalie Portman to "Jedi" can hardly make it worse than the plague of Care Bears that shredded all its cred from the start. But the inclusion of the Dread JJB in ANH would spoil a still cool film! As if making that Greebo dude shoot first at Han Solo wasn't bad enough!

  330. Is George Lucas a Closet Racest? by DebateUSA · · Score: 1

    Following up on this thread... Here is a story that just flat calls George a Closet Racest... href="http://www.debateusa.com/featured/ghand.htm" George Lucas, Closet Racist George Lucas is a racist. We know this because The Phantom Menace and the Rastafarian acting Jar Jar Binks showed his underlying hatred of black people, or so we were lead to believe. But there were those out there who were in denial about Lucas' hidden agenda, and demanded that this Hollywood icon be given the benefit of the doubt. Boy, do you have egg on your faces today.

    --
    The Judgement of the Foolish Need Only be Feared When it Flatters.
    1. Re:Is George Lucas a Closet Racest? by DebateUSA · · Score: 1

      My apologies for munging the link. Here is the corrected link... George Lucas, Closet Racist

      --
      The Judgement of the Foolish Need Only be Feared When it Flatters.
  331. Amidala won't appear in Episode 6 by hellfire · · Score: 1

    At least, not in any form where Luke or Leia or any main characters see her.

    For those who are not familiar, star wars has an extensive novelization of the universe too. These books are not just trash novels like the star trek episodes. These novels have real continuity and each one is approved by Lucas so that they fit into a universe. The continuity problems are few and far between, unlike the star trek universe where such continuity problems are rampant since there is no attempt at real control.

    In the novels after Jedi, at no point does Padme appear. Also, there is one trilogy where one of the plots is Luke searching for his mother. He never finds his mother in that trilogy either. So the fact remains that Luke does not know his mother and should not know his mother in the movies.

    Otherwise Lucas will damage his own universe, destroy a hell of a lot of continuity, ergo bruising his ego far too much and causing him severe mental trauma.

    By the way, why are we discussing highly suspect and unconfirmed rumors anyway?

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  332. "I applaud his efforts," AKA. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . .(Score:-1, Troll). Thank you, drive through.

  333. You need to chill. by digitalunity · · Score: 2

    You seem to have had a raw nerve hit. You know, abusers and abusees may have found that comment offensive. Just as alcoholics find beer in their face offensive. But you need to realize that it is *you* with the problem, not everyone else. If that post made your hair stand up straight, you need to take some time to think about why.

    You have issues buddy.

    Go seek professional psychiatric assistance immediately.

    --
    You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    1. Re:You need to chill. by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Right, I've got issues. And would you care to elaborate on how you reached that conclusion? Do you know my history or my story? Do you know the people that I know? Who apointed you God? No, the original post of this thread was in immensely poor taste. But just as the original poster had a right to post, so I had a right to respond. And just as I made no judgements of the original poster, so you should not make judgements of me.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    2. Re:You need to chill. by digitalunity · · Score: 2

      I don't have to know your history, or your family or friends. I'm not god. Heres a little history from my point of view:

      I'm a waiter when I'm not coding C++. By company rules, I must present a bottle of wine when I greet the guest. Do you realize how many AA customers I get who seriously freak out because I brought the wine; even if I don't even present or mention the wine and I'm just holding it. They try to give me their entire story about how it is personally offensive to them.

      *I DON'T CARE*

      Don't want any, just say 'no thank you'.

      How was the original post in poor taste? He was noting the similarity between geeks and battered wives. They often DO return to the batterer. That's a fact.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    3. Re:You need to chill. by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      The fact of the matter is, the subject of battery is a rather sensitive subject to a lot of people, and to liken it to a Star Wars geek not caring whether the dialouge was bad or not was not in my opinion in good taste.

      You missed my point though. The point I was making was you attacked me directly, claiming that I was in need of professional help, and you somehow reached this conclusion by the simple fact that I found (and stated my opinion) that the original post was in poor taste.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  334. Trilogy of Trilogies by fishexe · · Score: 1

    Basically I've been anticipating the trilogy of trilogies ever since I knew Star Wars was a neat movie (at least since '94 I've known about it.)

    It's pretty much old news that that's the way it's intended to be. The most plausible explanation I've read is that Lucas originally had 3 movies he wanted to make, but each of those was so thick it would have to take up 3 movies by itself, he was told. So he did the middle "movie" first and that was the Star Wars trilogy. Makes sense to me.

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  335. Re:I knew it.... Star Wars XP - by pyrote · · Score: 1

    Not really, they hae an embeded version of the movie, but it's not feasable to release it to the public.

    It would confuse the viewers and they wouldn't be able to all their AV equipment (read:thx,AC3,etc..) with individual releases.

    Besides the "jar jar" module would commonly be removed, but would cause episode 2 to crash and episode 1 to just not make sense.

    Besides, even though someone HAS proven this release is possible, you would be only hiding charicters behind other charicters but they would still be there.

    I'd have to erase my incompatible versions of episode 4-6 (on VHS) and forget about them for anything to make sense.

    --
    THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
  336. ...and you are an arrogant ass by Snaller · · Score: 1

    if people create emotional bonds to something, they have every right to wish and dream, they may not have any reason to expect - but who the hell are you to deny them their dreams.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  337. Goeorge Lucas is the father of Luke Skywalker ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once upon a long long time ago on a planet far far away...

    An incredible dreamer and true believer talentes highly above the average,
    writes down the epic saga of good and evil. On a world a little like ours
    (remember the beggars at Mos Eisley ?), sometimes clean,
    often rotten, a bunch of nearly-children seeks out to gain knowledge
    from an old man in order to safe the Universe (and yes, not a bit less).
    Hunted by an intergalactic coorporation, called The Empire, these brave hearts
    fight with their very little forces, driven by only one thing:
    A New Hope ! So the world will be much better one day, not corrupt, not in fear.
    Humanly desirable, not technically overpowered, commanded by a
    creature who lost most of its human(ity) parts ("breath, breath")
    and conquered by a pervert old fart....
    ("Huarwhahahahherrrerer DARK SIDE......UHAH JOOOOOYYYY, my son")
    And they succeeded, hurray !

    Twenty years later on a planet close close to ours
    a techically skilled architect of power, a sales- and businessman,
    washed in all waters of Good and Evil continues a saga of epic size,
    well covered by machines (CGI) without heart (all actors seem to be
    having side roles next to the CGI wonders) and totally and completly
    directed at a market. When asked why he left the light side of the Force
    George Lucas answered: "Breat, breath".
    (Okay, let's say "cough, cough")

    But The Saga is not over. Will Darth Lucas return to the Good side of the Force ?
    Will he resign, kill the Imperialistic desires of the
    Dark Side ? Will he defeat his evil alter Ego controlling The Imperium
    (Lucasfilms, Lucasbooks, Lucasarts, IML, Lucasgames, Lucasminds, Lucasgirls, Lucasboys,
    Lucassneekers, Lucasdrinks, Lucascoffee, Lucascars, Lucasparents, Lucaaaaaahhhhhhhh)
    Will he kill the evil Imperator, the enemy of all joy, his own Ego ?
    Will he give us a New Hope again ?

    Wait and see and come back to part three when we hear Jar Jar Binks say:
    "Good bye cruel world, I am never coming back!"

  338. you idiot u misquoted JFK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go to http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/weekly/aa021 700a.htm u r wrong about jfk u idiot misquoting him like that u asshole

  339. Re:I knew it.... Star Wars XP - by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
    • the last 35 minutes of the movie is just a BSOD

    I'd rather it had a scene with you in your Chewbacca costume. For some reason, I can't get that image out of my head, and it's deeply disturbing me.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  340. We Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet we will see a lot of Natalie Portman in Episode III, but I bet she must dies horribly (more horribly that Anakin's mother and a lot less clothing) by the hands of the Trade Federation. That will cause Anakin to go completely over to the dark side, that is after he single handedly kills every members in the entire thousand system Trade Federation. The guy's got an understandable anger management problem!!!

    How else would he allow himself to become the all powerful Darth Vader we see in Episode IV? Normally, Anakin's good side (at least in Episode II) seems strong enough to resist the usual bribes. His only weakness is his huge thirst for revenge after a murder of a loved one! It would make Darth Vader a more understandable character.

    Before long, Lucas is going to punish us all good during Episode III and we will simply scream for more. But we will scream louder if their more Natalie!! :)

  341. Portman! by herraukuli · · Score: 1

    Are you totally gay? I think they should insert Portman everywhere! She's sweet!

  342. Re:So, he's going to fuck up the original Star War by DrVxD · · Score: 1

    > What other movies has Lucas made that are worth watching?

    I guess it depends on what you mean by "made" - if you mean "Directed", there's THX1138, American Graffiti, SW:EPIV, SW:EPI, SW:EPII. Which is pretty much all of his "major" works.

    If you mean "Produced", then there's also SW:EPV, SW:EPVI, Raiders of the Lost Ark, the excellent - despite Jeff Bridges - "Tucker: The Man and his dream", the list goes on.

    The real problem with Ep1&2 isn't that they're bad movies - they aren't, they're good movies. But they're NOT good George Lucas movies, and they ain't good Star Wars movies - I call this "Pink Floyd" syndrome.

    When an individual (or group of individuals) produce a work that raises the bar as high as "A New Hope" did, then it's always going to be difficult to follow. Lucas followd it fine with Empire. And then gave us those f****** teddy bears in ROTJ - but it was still a good movie. Most filmmakers would give their right arm to turn out anything half as good.

    --
    Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  343. Re:I knew it.... Star Wars XP - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up, Wesley!