Slashdot Mirror


Apple Releases Mac Mini

cranesan writes "The rumors of Apple releasing a small PC are confirmed. The Mac mini can be found at Apple's website. As expected, the box uses a G4 processor. You can order one today; estimate 3-4 weeks shipping date. Base unit starts at $499."

1,212 comments

  1. Dupe... by Delphix · · Score: 5, Informative

    C'mon guys. This isn't news, especially since you reported it yourself here. It's just a two day old dupe of old news.

    1. Re:Dupe... by BurritoWarrior · · Score: 4, Funny

      The next story will be about the Apple Shuffle.

    2. Re:Dupe... by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      C'mon guys. This isn't news, especially since you reported it yourself here [slashdot.org]. It's just a two day old dupe of old news.


      Especially since the Mac Mini was listed on Apple's site the day the story was first posted. This is hardly new confirmation.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Dupe... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Yea! Common you guys! It had a large message posting on it too.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Dupe... by The+Other+White+Boy · · Score: 1

      you know i can almost undestand a doop when its some tiny piece of news that someone could have missed, maybe it just had a few comments.

      but holy cow does that ever not apply here.

    5. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      goodbye bank account (Score:5, Funny)
      by rwurth (639926) on Tuesday January 11, @07:01PM (#11323733) wait, cheap Mac, cheap iPod. Nevermind
      [ Reply to This ]
    6. Re:Dupe... by gonzo-wireless · · Score: 0

      I guess if *someone* wanted it reported earlier, then *someone* should have submmitted it earlier. If you were there, on the front line of mac-con, why not tell us at the time?

    7. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Yea! Common you guys! It had a large message posting on it too.

      STFU, ad revenue is down, Slashdot needs page hits on their banner ads. If you weren't such a cheapskate you'd subscribe and help them out.

    8. Re:Dupe... by Chuqmystr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Uhhhh, yeh. I like already had myself to all that Mac Mini pr0n, smoked a cig, cleaned up, asked my computer if things were gonna get all wierd now and moved on to the next thing say, two days ago?

    9. Re:Dupe... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Umm do you see tat little star next to my name? It says I am a subscriber.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    10. Re:Dupe... by kzinti · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not only is it a dupe, but the announcement was so widely anticipated and so widely reported that you'd have to be living under a rock not to have heard about it! Way to stay on top of timely news, samzen.

    11. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you obviously haven't bought out a second account. Every good slashdotter has at least two accounts: one for posting, one for moderation of his own posts.

      Now get to it.

    12. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT, nigga.

    13. Re:Dupe... by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Hey, be fair, if samzenpus is going to reach his ambition of being the poster of every story on the front page, then we have to accept that a proportion of them are going to be a bit shit, such as "Fantastic Four trailer not available here". He's only human.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    14. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I missed the first post of it. :(

      I am glad they reposted it.

    15. Re:Dupe... by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Inspired, man. Absolutely beautiful! You've made a friend!

    16. Re:Dupe... by JoeSilva · · Score: 1

      At least the first posting had a chrome Apple Logo with it. This dupe posting has a G5 logo next to it even though it's about a Mac with a G4 in it.

    17. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA! I hadn't noticed that, but yeah. There is no G5 in the Mac Mini.

    18. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT, nigga.

      What are you, some sort of Slashdot redneck? Is that the best insult you can come up with?

    19. Re:Dupe... by Eric604 · · Score: 1

      i did not see any reports and therefore I appreciate this second announcement on /.

    20. Re:Dupe... by nomadic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well the only way to avoid duplicate stories would be to have some sort of way to, via some sort of computer automation, examine old stories and see if they had certain key words in common, some sort of "search engine" to coin a phrase. Obviously that would be impossible at our current level of technology, but one can hope for the future.

    21. Re:Dupe... by mgs1000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you heard the rumors about the iPhoto that can display photos?

    22. Re:Dupe... by ecklesweb · · Score: 1

      It was so widely reported that my wife asked me when I got home yesterday whether I'd heard about that "neat Mac-mini thing."

    23. Re:Dupe... by dcarey · · Score: 1

      Wow,

      Since dupe stories apparently make news on /., maybe I'll just post a dupe post (referenced here. Ironically it's on the same subject o.O). With the current logic, I should get mod points for it! Here goes:

      The REALLY sad part is that I don't read slashdot but maybe twice a week on average and ever *I* remember the dupe story ... the link color is already darkened from where I visited precisly the same link the the very short past.

      No, I don't believe this is the "death of slashdot or anything silly like that." But it is conceivable that in that that glorious mound of slashdot web code there could be a way to check the relevant links in the current article against the laready existing articles within the past yada yada yada, such that the "TinyP2P" link would be automatically flagged since it was referenced a short while ago. That way, editors can double check for dupes. I bet you could even do it in 15 lines (har har, hardy har har, har).

      Or mebbe use teh "search feature."

      keke.
      --

      -- (Score:i , Imaginary)

      --

      -- (Score:i , Imaginary)

    24. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I was telling her about it while you were at work.

    25. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You pay for this crap?

    26. Re:Dupe... by wwwillem · · Score: 1
      ... but the announcement was so widely anticipated and so widely reported ...

      Funny example was a discussion last night with my wife, who's absolutely not interested in computers or techies stuff, probably even doesn't know what an iPod is. She asked if I had heard recently from one of my friends, where I told her I had just that day emailed with him about the new Apple. Where her reply was "Yes I know, that small one ... from Steve Jobs!!". After the big smile implying "hey, you didn't expect that from me" (which was true :-), she admitted that the miniMac had been reported on BBC world service, which she watches every day. Talking about "widely reported"....

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    27. Re:Dupe... by stupidfoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I heard that apple is creating a portable multimedia device. Not a lot of specs known, but it will be in white plastic, with a circular wheel to navigate your songs.

    28. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      C'mon guys. This isn't news, especially since you reported it yourself here. It's just a two day old dupe of old news.

      So then you think that it's ok to post about the rumor, but then when it actually happens and all the details are sorted out, then no one should mention it?

    29. Re:Dupe... by nuggetman · · Score: 4, Funny

      They already did that. It's got no wireless, and less space than a Nomad. lame.

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    30. Re:Dupe... by kkovach · · Score: 1

      And yet there are nearly 600 comments here!

      Er, hmmmm ...

      - Kevin

      --
      The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act.
    31. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I bet it will be a flop.

    32. Re:Dupe... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's impossible to check for dupes without some form of automation, and we're probably years away from this "search engine", as you call it. (By the way, you really ought to patent this idea!)

      Still, even someday in the far future, say the year 2525, when we finally do develop a "search engine", do you think the stupid editors will look up from scratching their nuts to actually use it? Though, no doubt, they'll post a dupe about it.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    33. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's okay to post about the rumor, then when it actually happens it's okay to post again.

      But that already happend. This story is the story being posted again again, two days after it happend and was posted.

    34. Re:Dupe... by Laaserboy · · Score: 1

      Thank you to the reviewer for posting such a stale old story. I haven't had such a good laugh on /. for quite a while.

      A few more news items:

      Elephants are comming over the Alps. Head for the hills!

      Man discovers fire.

      Leave Troy now!

    35. Re:Dupe... by dangerz · · Score: 1

      Apparently there's this thing called an Apple Lisa. Supposed to be top of the line.

      --
      The greatest experience we can have is the mysterious.
      - Albert Einstein
    36. Re:Dupe... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      I hope he's using a phished credit card number.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    37. Re:Dupe... by Blapto · · Score: 1

      Dude, my mum said "I saw those mac minis today" on Tuesday afternoon, following with "I think we could do with a new desktop." She's never used the one we got 4 years ago!

    38. Re:Dupe... by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      I hear they found Saddam ...

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    39. Re:Dupe... by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > Not only is it a dupe, but the announcement was so widely anticipated
      > and so widely reported....

      Oh come on people! Anyone who doesn't already know slashdot's biases is too new here. They typify the stereotypes of the Mac zealot.

      But since I'm going to get -1 flamebait anyway, I'll get ontopic and comment about this turkey.

      At $399 it would offer some value, just because it can run OS X and a PC based machine can't. At $349 I might buy one myself. At $499 it is a rip. Go price out a cute little epia if you want a small computer, and the epia can actually DO the small media centric computer thing, unlike the mini-mac which lacks any sort of expansion slot. An epia would also make a better thin client.

      Folks, Dell is selling complete PC machines for $499, with better specs I might add, including the display! EPIA machines can be built up in one lots for about the same price. But I guess Apple is still bound by their unwritten agreement with Microsoft that they can't actually compete in the non-apple market if they want Office to continue shipping.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    40. Re:Dupe... by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      • It was so widely reported that my
      • wife asked me when I got home yesterday whether I'd heard about that "neat Mac-mini thing."

      Faaaaake! A slashdotter with a wife? Faaaaake!

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    41. Re:Dupe... by orac2 · · Score: 1

      the mini-mac which lacks any sort of expansion slot.

      I used to really care about expansion slots. A lot. But one day I realised, thanks to firewire and USB and PMCIA, that it had been years since I'd last bought any peripheral or upgrade, (bar a graphics card), that required me to pop something into an expansion slot. So now I don't care about exapnsion slots. At all.

      --
      "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
    42. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any editor worth their name should be informed enough and interested enough in the topic that they should have no problem remembering the stories posted during the past few days. Most of us can spot a dupe as soon as we read the summary, and we don't even work at slashdot. If we can do it, a professional (i.e. someone who gets paid) should also muster the energy to do this.

      The problem isn't that they lack software or don't use it, there is no need for software. The problem is that the editors rarely seem to use their brains!

    43. Re:Dupe... by JahToasted · · Score: 1

      Or the editors could actually read their own website. But I guess we can't expect them to take so much time out of their busy schedule to do that.

    44. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Followed by an update about Apple suing "Nick De Plume" of Think Secret. Let's not forget that we are dealing with litigeous bastards now.

    45. Re:Dupe... by docneuro · · Score: 1

      The hype is amazing and the NYT even had an editorial on how amazingly different Apple is thinking.

      But looking at this from a typical consumer's point of view:
      mac mini + 512 MB ram + keyboard + superdrive + 80 GB disk + 17" NEC monitor on website = $991.

      emac + 512 MB ram + superdrive + 80 GB disk = $1074

      So Apple is thinking different to the tune of $81, plus you can't add anything to the mac mini, and you now have the same jumble of cords and non-fashionable black monitor as with every other PC. Umm so remind me why this is so awesome?

    46. Re:Dupe... by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > I used to really care about expansion slots.

      Kinda defeats the whole mini-pc look whne you have to pile up a load a crap beside it. Doesn't look good. And I don't think I'd like to do video capture via an external device. I like my PVR-350 for that.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    47. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Umm", the reason this is awesome is because this thing is not targeted to people who do not currently own any computer hardware whatsoever. It's targeted to people who currently own PC's who already own a keyboard, mouse and monitor, and have considered switching to the Mac (or adding one to thier PC usage patterns) but have been turned off by the high pricetag for a complete desktop G4/G5 system And it's awesome because it's just a damned fine piece of industrial design.

    48. Re:Dupe... by Bilestoad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh? I thought it meant "asshole" a la Kurt Vonnegut.

      picture

    49. Re:Dupe... by kevcol · · Score: 1

      Or maybe even talk to each other!

    50. Re:Dupe... by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...At $499 it is a rip....

      Yes, you CAN get a cheap Dell or whatever, but you'll still be saddled with a malware prone Windows box where you'd have to spend a bunch of cash to buy anti-virus/spyware programs and spend a lot of time installing that, as well as countless forever continuing "updates" from MS. After all that, you need to buy second rate apps to awkwardly try to replace the cool, integrated iLife programs that come with the Mini. So if your time is worth nothing, then get a "cheaper" Dell. Specs mean nothing if the computer misbehaves because of bugs and malware, like Windows often does.

      The Mac mini is intended for ordinary people who HAVE a cheap Dell or whatever and want to trash that and use the keyboard and monitor from it with a secure, integrated computer that won't keep them subject to the next virus or spyware infection because their anti-malware programs did not get updated in time.

      --
      All theory is gray
    51. Re:Dupe... by zonker · · Score: 0

      i bet they'll find those wmd's.

    52. Re:Dupe... by slantyyz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It seems like a lot of people are missing the point by saying "Dude, go get a Dell."

      The bottom line - the Mini Mac isn't for people looking for an affordable PC, it's for people looking for an affordable Mac.

      The distinction is bigger than it sounds.

    53. Re:Dupe... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      you know i can almost undestand a doop

      Well, I'm glad someone understands the DOOP. I'll personally never understand an organization that can put a doofus like Zapp Brannigan in command of a starship when there are more capable officers like Kif Kroker available (though I have fun trying)...

    54. Re:Dupe... by mrlpz · · Score: 1

      Screw DUPE. I was the first to report it to /., the first night after MacWorld had started.....do YOU think that putz of a Moderator ( Timothy ) bothered to post it ? Hell no.

      Back then it was backed with pictures of something called the "iHome", which looks a little similar to the mini...almost the same form factor, but with slightly different labelling.....oh well..guess us non-subscribers aren't good enough to post stories from.

    55. Re:Dupe... by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > you'd have to spend a bunch of cash to buy anti-virus/spyware programs..

      Eh? I haven't a single anti-virus program installed on a Fedora box. :) FC would run just fine on the typical Dell and with a quick addition of Dag's fine repo to the up2date config to get around the stupid patent problems associated with all popular digital media, would serve quite nicely as a basic PC.

      > The Mac mini is intended for ordinary people who HAVE a cheap Dell

      Nice idea, would be nice if it worked but I hope nobody is betting the ranch on it. Spend as much (or close to) as the original system just to replace the box part with something half as powerful, woefully underpopulated with RAM and with the punyiest hard drive anyone still makes as a new item. It's size and low noise might have let it make sense as a media center PC.. except it lacks IR, video capture, optical audio output, progressive scan video and enough storage to make it practical.

      Personally I know a few people I'd recommend one to, on the grounds they put it on a KVM and only connect IT to the net and run their other stuff on the 'doze box. But they would never do it because the ones who most NEED a Mac to escape the horrors you rightly ascribe to Windows are the ones who NEVER will.

      Yes OS X is nice and all that, but OSX and iLife isn't worth THAT much of a premium; and lets face it, beyond what comes preloaded on a Mac you are pretty much S.O.L. unless you install Fink and once you do that you may as well run the stuff in the native environment they were written for and use the occasional legacy Mac app via MOL under Yellowdog.

      Which is the Apple problem, they are selling underperforming hardware at very premium pricing, hoping that a) the nice case and b) the couple of nice apps they artifically keep exclusive to their machines will justify the price. For a few arts crowd types (and slashdot editors who managed to cash out some .com dollars before the bust) it seems to be a fair deal but everyone else just shakes their heads and wonders "WTF?" And apple stays in their assigned place, a niche 2% player waiting for the day when the Penguin passes them by and seals their doom.

      If you think the Mac suffers a lack of 3rd party apps now, just wait until they aren't the designated competition anymore. Of course none of this will matter to the faithful, who will keep right on buying whatever Steve declares to be 'cool' until there isn't an Apple anymore, then they will read the latest rumors of who is buying the old Apple IP and promising to resurrect the platform.... remind you of anyone?

      p.s. Yes this post IS a troll. Sorry guys I just have zero sympathy for the Mac 'faithful' anymore. Wake up and put down the little plastic cup with Steve's special Kool-Aid.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    56. Re:Dupe... by iroll · · Score: 1

      I have built an Epia machine. The Mac Mini is a better deal.

      -> It comes with a real video card unit with real video memory, and a processor that smokes (yes smokes) the C3. This isn't the shared memory video stuff Via has. Via is of course fine for a low-power email/web/DVD computer, but shows its lack of guts when you try to do ANY kind of lifting... like flash games...

      -> Price a case that doesn't look like dogshit, which I found that most of the 3rd party ones do. Via's cases are nice, but they cost more than $100. So between the Epia and the Case I'm already close to $300. Don't forget 256MB of memory (at least!) for $30-$50 depending on the deal you get. Now toss in a 40 gig HD and a DVD/CD-RW and you're looking at around (or more) than $400. *Now* throw in a copy of Windows XP (OEM) and you're pushing past $500. Want Office? Drop another couple bills. And forget about iLife; I challenge you to show me equivalently functional windows software for $80. So, now you've got a slower machine that costs more and has less software. Whoopeeee.....

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    57. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But that already happend. This story is the story being posted again again

      Oh I see. Sorry.

    58. Re:Dupe... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Naw... all the fanboys will buy it.

    59. Re:Dupe... by brad3378 · · Score: 1

      hit it with a sledge hammer and rename it apple clobber.

      --

    60. Re:Dupe... by MojoStan · · Score: 1

      But now the Apple Store is not Slashdotted and Apple Expoed.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    61. Re:Dupe... by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...they are selling underperforming hardware...

      A G4 Mac will outperform any Dell computer of the same clock frequency because the G4 is more efficient. I have an el cheapo 1.4Ghz Wintel (actually AMD) box and it is SLOW compared to my 550Mhz Powerbook. I cannot get DSL or cable here and that PC serves as a NAT box for several Macs and another somewhat faster (and more expensive) AMD box on a slow dial up.

      Linux is a fine OS, but mostly for the/. types like you who know a lot about computers. Anyone who doesn't have expertise or know someone who does and that someone is willing to do free support for Linux is basically stuck with Windows or a Mac. I remember reading predictions about Linux on the average desktop years ago, but that has not happened and will not in the forseeable future.

      Perhaps you could post the specs on the $500 box you have in mind, including its software so a comparison can be done.

      --
      All theory is gray
    62. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, and look at all the retarded fools who wasted their money on inferior products such as the ipod.

      Just because it sells well with the lowest common denominator doesn't mean it is any good.

    63. Re:Dupe... by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > A G4 Mac will outperform any Dell computer of the same clock frequency

      Which is meaningless since Dell hasn't sold a sub 2Ghz machine in a year or so and Apple is peddling these mini-macs with 1.2 and 1.4Ghz processors. It is hard to find a LAPTOP with a CPU that slow.

      I know all about the POWER platform being a better performer clock for clock, almost anything beats a P4 clock for clock though, just ask AMD who is also stomping a mudhole in Intel in that department. But quantify has a quality of it's own and when the Intel machine has twice the clock speed that is an advantage that is hard to beat. (I am typing this on an Athlon64 clocked at 2.0Ghz and rated at 3200 "Intel equiv".)

      --
      Democrat delenda est
  2. Lightening reactions... by Nexum · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... in other news Microsoft unveils next generation Windows operating system... ""Windows XP".

    --

    This sig has been deprecated.
    1. Re:Lightening reactions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... in other news Microsoft unveils next generation Windows operating system... ""Windows XP".

      Huh? XP? What's XP? God damn it, I just upgraded to Windows ME so I'd be kosher for this millenium! There's another after ME?

      Is it 2101 already? Anyway, since it's now 2101 shouldn't Longhorn be here by now?

  3. Not Politically Correct by JohnPM · · Score: 1, Informative

    PC? It's not a PC it's a Mac! *fume*

    --
    Karma police, I've given all I can, it's not enough, I've given all I can, but we're still on the payroll.
    1. Re:Not Politically Correct by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Informative
      PC? It's not a PC it's a Mac! *fume*


      As much as 'PC' has come to define a machine derived from the original IBM PC, 'PC' means "Personal Computer".

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Not Politically Correct by loic_2003 · · Score: 1

      A Mac is a personal computer, so it is actually correct. The PC/Mac differentiation is common although incorrect, strictly speaking.

    3. Re:Not Politically Correct by CdXiminez · · Score: 1

      My Commodore 128D, 1987, had 'Personal Computer' printed on the front in large friendly letters.

    4. Re:Not Politically Correct by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I will ignore you subject so I can get past the joke part,,,,

      PC Stands for Personal Computer. Macs are PC because Macs are personal computers. They are usually located in a persons home and owned by one person. Most of the time there is only one person using a Mac at a time. So a Mac is a Personal Computer.
      Normally there are 3 levels for systems (they are more but these are the major ones) PC, Workstation, Server. PC are usually used for common needs like the stuff at home. Workstations are used for businesses and sometimes have multiple people using them at the same time or handling heavier calculations, and Servers which have many people using them at the same time.
      A system bought as a PC can be used as a Server and a Workstation and vice versa for all the combinations (It may be hard for some servers to be used as PCs but it is possible) the the Mac Mini is defiantly designed as a PC, as well as the eMac, and the iMac. The PowerMac G5 are designed to be workstations, and the XServes are designed to be servers.

      The term PC which usually stands for wintel boxes came from IBM PC then a bunch of other companies made compatible boxes called IBM Compatible PC. Then after a while the compatibles became more popular then the IBMs So the dropped the IBM from the description, without IBM there is no need for Compatible so it just became a PC.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Not Politically Correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PC = Pre Cambrium.

      Everyone knows that.

    6. Re:Not Politically Correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mac is a personal computer, but not a Personal Computer, which is what's meant by PC.

    7. Re:Not Politically Correct by killerface · · Score: 1

      well it's a funny joke, but at the same time it really gets me miffed when i hear x86 computers refered to as "PC" not because thats not what they are but the negititve connotation that comes with it. Mac users differentiate themselves by calling the x86 platform a "PC", which in thier minds means windows, spyware, virii, and other such things. So basically FU PC ill stick with x86

    8. Re:Not Politically Correct by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Yeah! My old C64 also had "Personal Computer" printed on the label.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    9. Re:Not Politically Correct by b-baggins · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, PC means an IBM compatible computer. Aramaic is a dead language. So is Latin. English is not. The meaning of the word has changed. Get over it.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    10. Re:Not Politically Correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just bollocks - Latin is still in wide usage.

    11. Re:Not Politically Correct by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      'PC' means "Personal Computer".

      Ironically enough, a phrase coined by Apple.

      Before that they were "microcomputers".

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    12. Re:Not Politically Correct by Skye16 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fine then, I'll see your point and raise you the fact that we just changed it back. Get over it.

    13. Re:Not Politically Correct by fr2asbury · · Score: 4, Funny

      Latin is not dead! It's in retirement, enjoying lucrative consulting positions in the scientific and medical communities.
      Other than that, it occasionally goes to church and has an interest in oral sex.

    14. Re:Not Politically Correct by standards · · Score: 1

      PC? It's not a PC it's a Mac! *fume*

      My Apple II+'s shipping box has the slogan "Apple: The Most Personal Computer".

    15. Re:Not Politically Correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also interested in what's happening in the world.
      Yeah. (Internet-)Radio news in Latin.

    16. Re:Not Politically Correct by CrackedButter · · Score: 0

      What does Mac stand for? Mouse-activated-computer. Think about it... Does that mean all PC's are macs? :)

    17. Re:Not Politically Correct by CountBrass · · Score: 4, Funny

      My Psion Organiser II had "Cray Supercomputer" written on it in red crayon...

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    18. Re:Not Politically Correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, no - it's a contraction of Macintosh: the name of the first mac.

    19. Re:Not Politically Correct by The+Infamous+Grimace · · Score: 1

      Mac is short for Macintosh. You know, like the apple.

      Time to fire the research dept, maybe? :-)

      (tig)

      --
      Ignorance and prejudice and fear
      Walk hand in hand
    20. Re:Not Politically Correct by CrackedButter · · Score: 0

      Wrong Mr AC...

    21. Re:Not Politically Correct by Xilman · · Score: 1
      Aramaic is a dead language.

      Nope. It's alive and well in a few places in the Middle East and, I believe, Cyprus though I may be wrong on the latter so don't hold me to it.

      So is Latin.

      You are on slightly firmer ground here. It's not spoken by anyone as a first language, AFAIK, but it's certainly in widespread use in many places, including the RC church, Oxford University and a Finnish radio station --- to mention only a few. I'd claim it's not dead, it's only resting.

      Paul

      --
      Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate
    22. Re:Not Politically Correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Psion Organiser II had "Cray Supercomputer" written on it in red crayon...

      The irony is that the latest handhelds are actually more powerful than the early Cray supercomputers.

    23. Re:Not Politically Correct by s_mencer · · Score: 1

      You just made my morning with that post... thank you. That has to be one of the most clever posts I've seen on /. in months.

    24. Re:Not Politically Correct by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      So when Apple talks about switching from PC's to Macs, what the hell are they talking about?

      Regardless of the actual acronym's expansion, "PC" has come to define a computer using an x86 compatible CPU. Saying that Apple has released a PC makes no sense to Apple, nor to anyone else in the computer world. Word definitions are set by the majority, whether you like it or not.

    25. Re:Not Politically Correct by nightsweat · · Score: 1

      I knew Apple had problems satisfying demand, but if you're just gettign your Apple II+ now, I'd complain.

      Who knows, you might get a free DuoDrive out of it.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    26. Re:Not Politically Correct by sharkey · · Score: 1
      the Mac Mini is defiantly designed as a PC

      I know it's a typo, but the image of Apple engineers designing the Mini to defy the "PC is a Wintel computer" made me chuckle.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    27. Re:Not Politically Correct by Carbon+Unit+549 · · Score: 1

      Word definitions are set by the majority, whether you like it or not.

      I agree and since only ~6% of computer users (ie. sole Mac owners) think PC only refers to IBM clones, the majority wins and the original definition stands.

      --

      nohup rm -rf ~/. >& zen &

    28. Re:Not Politically Correct by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      Pratically speaking, we can extract from your post that you think MAC is an acronym. However, I must report your use of this language constitutes a backronym, and not a even a well-known one.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    29. Re:Not Politically Correct by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      And of course the entire discussion reminds me of a classic story, paraphrased:

      Imagine that tomorrow, Cray releases a new computer. It's the size of a hardback book, but only a quarter of an inch thick. It has a 10 megapixel display. The processor can do 50GFLOPS and it has 10GB of main memory and a 1TB hard drive. It's controlled entirely through voice recognition and comes with a large suite of powerful software. The whole thing costs $400.

      The first thing the computing community asks: "Is it PC compatible?"

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    30. Re:Not Politically Correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Mac is a pc, not a PC.

    31. Re:Not Politically Correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your distinction make sense?

      In late-80s to mid-90s sense, a "PC" usually meant Wintel (i.e. Intel x86 compatible computer running some version of Microsoft Windows), but wasn't restricted to that.

      Today...the only major difference between PCs and Macs in a hardware sense is the CPU. The key question is whether we consider the software difference significant - does a PC have to run Windows? If you define a PC as an "IBM compatible", then that's a hardware definition, and a PC running Linux is still a PC. However, a PC running Linux is just as different from a PC running MSWin as a PC running MSWin is from a Mac running MacOS X. A PC running Linux is reasonably similar to a Mac running Linux.

      Replace Linux with whatever else you might want to run (I'm running FreeBSD on a couple of my machines, Linux on a couplemore, and MacOS X on one).

      In a hardware sense, while (x86) PCs cover a lot more variety of hardware, Macs are just PCs with a different CPU and a select subset of standard hardware - sort of like if you want to buy a specific brand of PC.

      In a software sense, you can distinguish machines based on the operating system they run, and/or the CPU...which is more important? That depends on what compatibility you need. In any case, binary cross OS compatibility is limited (Linux/x86 can run some Windows software - but so can Mac/ppc), and source-code-wise, usually the operating system makes more of a difference than the CPU...

    32. Re:Not Politically Correct by bwintx · · Score: 1

      Correct. One of Apple's early advertising slogans was: "The Most Personal Computer."

      --
      Discussion System prefs link: http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=editcomm
    33. Re:Not Politically Correct by tricorn · · Score: 1

      When I first heard that 20 years ago, the specs given were for what would now be a not very remarkable system (something like 1 GB of main memory, 100GB of disk space, 1000 MIPS) - you know, not much more than an iPod.

    34. Re:Not Politically Correct by nsayer · · Score: 1
      I'll see your point and raise you

      No poker player would ever actually say that.

    35. Re:Not Politically Correct by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      If what you said was true then you would have to rethink every song and book and movie out there that talked about being "gay" since gay means happy and not the current definition.

      Dont be a tool, even in the IT/CS world PC still means Personal Computer. Thats as bad as calling it a IBM/PC compatable when IBM doesnt even make a OS for the consumer models anymore.

      Windows PC would be closer to the right name for it.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    36. Re:Not Politically Correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I looked it up:

      personal computer
      n. Abbr. PC
      A computer built around a microprocessor for use by an individual, as in an office or at home or school.

      So you would appear to be wrong.

    37. Re:Not Politically Correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alan Kay used the term 'Personal Computer' way before Apple ever released a product. Might want to google Alan Kay's name and perhaps 'sketchpad'.

      Giving Apple (or IBM, Microsoft, etc) credit for this is not entirely correct.

    38. Re:Not Politically Correct by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      If what you said was true then you would have to rethink every song and book and movie out there that talked about being "gay" since gay means happy and not the current definition.

      Dont be a tool, even in the IT/CS world PC still means Personal Computer. Thats as bad as calling it a IBM/PC compatable when IBM doesnt even make a OS for the consumer models anymore.


      Yeah, well, I suggest you phone up the Gartner Group and tell them they need to change to world to match your definitions.

      Because clearly if the most influential group of analysts in the industry calls it a PC they must also be tools.

      Now go away.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    39. Re:Not Politically Correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, PC means an IBM compatible computer.
      1. You meant to say, "Lenov compatible computer."
      2. "Sometimes words have . . . two meanings." --Led Zepplin

    40. Re:Not Politically Correct by kcargill · · Score: 1

      Of course, Latin (in its modern forms of Spanish, French, Romanian, etc.) is spoken by hundreds of millions of people.

  4. Old News? by kristeh1337 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know of at least 3 people who've already ordered theirs, how is this still news? Get with the program!

  5. Headless Alternative for Less by mr.henry · · Score: 1, Informative
    This $500 Apple is still insanely overpriced.

    GotApex? has a "headless Dell" on their site for $449.

    Here are the specs:
    2.8Ghz P4 w/800Mhz bus
    256MB DDR2 SDRAM
    40GB S-ATA
    2 year on site warranty

    Of course, if I don't get modded to hell, there will be a dozen replys from the Apple "amen corner" telling me that the Apple is a better deal, etc.

    BTW, this P4 is not even a particularly hot deal. GotApex? had a Dell P4 with a 17" LCD last Sunday for $599 -- the same price as the "high end" Mac mini.

    1. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, go and buy one today!

      If you don't see the purpose behind the Mini then don't comment on it.

    2. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by idiot900 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, the Mac is more expensive in terms of raw computing power. But, a lot of people consider Mac OS X to be worth a significant premium over Windows XP.

      But, most importantly, what tasks can you, as a user, do with a $500 PC that you can't with the $500 Mac?

    3. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everything is about the Hardware Spec. If it was all about that, how many iPods vs. Dell DJ's do you think would have been sold?

      I am PC and Mac guy (MCSE,CNE,CCNP) and Apple does provide tangible goods to the $499 Mac Mini that may well make it worth it to many a consumer.

    4. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by gray+code · · Score: 3, Insightful

      come ON, for a PC user with a little bit of extra money sitting around who's interested in a Mac, this is a great deal. They've already got all the stuff they need to run it, it's small, unobtrusive, powerful enough to do the things Macs do (ie, get your everyday work done), and is still pretty sexy.

      Yes there are cheaper alternatives, but they're not THAT much cheaper. Paying $200 more for a Mac (using your math from above) is demonstrably better than paying $500+ more for a Mac, and the user experience is going to be pretty much the same for the buyer in either case.

    5. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but that "headless Dell" is fugly and everything but whisper quiet.

    6. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's without a DVD-ROM or any Software except XP Home (the Mac comes with the full version of OSX not a cut down version).

      So you've got to add:
      XP-Pro (at least)
      DVD-ROM
      Quicken 2005
      Office
      Video editing suite

      *then* start comparing prices.

    7. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeap I see you've been modded as "flamebait" despite that being anything but a flame.

    8. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by CommandNotFound · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This $500 Apple is still insanely overpriced.

      True, but when my retired mother wants a new PC and also wants to get one of those digital cameras everyone is buying, guess which one I'm going to suggest? I'm going to suggest the $600 box that won't require me to sit in front of it removing spyware and viruses for an hour every time I visit (which I do now for my in-laws, which has decreased since I put Mozilla on that machine). I look at the mac as a Linux for the rest of them, and if it costs a few hundred more up front, so be it.

    9. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      of course this is assuming buyers have no interest in the tiny box (which they will..) if you price a pc with a mini-case it works out around the same price as the mini and a similar spec sorry i don't have the link but i did read this somewhere honest.

    10. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      Yes but what would you rather have, a BMW or a Ford?

    11. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by phats+garage · · Score: 1
      For me, I can run a crazy amount of software on an intel/amd platform, running either windows or linux. Thats particularily important for me as I'm not going to code every solution for every need that I may need.

      Still, the mini looks cool, I hope to buy one (used in the far future from ebay for hopefully about $20).

    12. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by TheAcousticMotrbiker · · Score: 3, Informative

      play doom3

    13. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by nagora · · Score: 0, Troll
      But, a lot of people consider Mac OS X to be worth a significant premium over Windows XP.

      Actually, I'd buy a 339 quid Mac to run Linux on just to get rid of the big, noisy heat machine that sits on my desk at the moment. I doubt that the Dell would do anything for me in that department. As to the speed, well the G4 is so much better than the P4 it's not even funny; the P4 stinks even compared to Intel's other "weren't the 70's fun" chips.

      OS X, on the other hand is of no interest to me at all. I've used it and I've worked with other people that use it and I can't see the point of it. Some of the apps for it are nice, though. Just not enough to make me leave behind the utility of Linux for a world of locked down gaudy nonsense and five year old versions of *nix utilities.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    14. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      most importantly, what tasks can you, as a user, do with a $500 PC that you can't with the $500 Mac?

      Build it yourself, choosing each component for yourself.

    15. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by DenDave · · Score: 1
      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    16. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by ParVox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I am a VAR in the PC world and see this kind Dell pricing every day. The Mac mini is the first Apple product that I personally have ever wanted as it is in the same pricing arena at the PC products. This is about getting away from the 'Windows" world and it's viruses, and its spyware, and it's glitches. This Mac may do that. The PC pricing is well and good but don't forget to add a modem, antivirus etc. Otherwise you are toast. I make a good living fixing Microsoft issues that don't have to be there. The intended customers for that PC are home users. The kind of users that don't understand viruses and spyware. The new Mac may be the perfect computer for the home users that aren't geeks. If Apple is trying to increase market share this is a great way to do it. I put my money were my mouth is. My MiniMac (pinkie in the air) ships the 22th. Time to learn if this is the Mac to recommend to the question, "What home computer should I buy?"

    17. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by 01dbs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And isn't the target market for this computer people who already own a Windows machine and would like to switch over? If you already own monitor, keyboard, etc., maybe $500 isn't all that much to make a switch you've been contemplating but didn't want to spend $1500 to do.

    18. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But, most importantly, what tasks can you, as a user, do with a $500 PC that you can't with the $500 Mac?

      I can't plug in my microphone or stereo in the Mac since Apple decided to skip the line in...

    19. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by way2trivial · · Score: 0, Redundant
      type on my keyboard, navigate with my mouse, and look at the LCD screen.--

      apples CHEAPEST monitor option is still a $1000 cinema display-

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    20. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by DrWhizBang · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This $500 Apple is still insanely overpriced.

      GotApex? has a "headless Dell" on their site for $449.


      This is not really a reasonable comparison. This Mac Mini is a super small form-factor PC. Try this:
      Mini-itx system with Morex case

      After I added the optical drive, upgraded to the 1200 processor/motherboard, upgraded hard disk to match apple, etc, I came in around $730. And that's for a PC with shared video (unichrome) that is still over twice the size of the Mac Mini, running WinXP, and looking about as attractive as a big warm turd. The Cappuccinopc web site has some PCs that may be a closer comparison, but they are also more expensive and include Intel Extreme video.

      If someone out there made a 6.5 by 6.5 by 2 PC with a real video card and slot-loading dvd drive for 499, I would be all over it.

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
    21. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by sgant · · Score: 5, Informative

      How is the Mini "insanely overpriced" compared to the computer you mentioned?

      CPU - OK, the "headless Dell" is faster.
      RAM - Both same amount of RAM
      HD - Both 40 gigs
      Warranty - the Dell is a year better..and is on-site.
      BOTH COST $499

      So, where is the "insanely overpriced" come in? If it were $699 then perhaps you would have a valid argument. But of course, you do not.

      Not to mention the fact you get a TON of software with the Mini and OSX. How much software comes with the Dell? Yeah, thought so...

      And here I'm not even using a Mac nor own a Mac and even I can see you're so full of shit it's not even funny. If you have a beef against Apple, then please, think a little harder next time to come up with something of substance.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    22. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Meneudo · · Score: 1

      Actually, since the prices are similar, a better analogy would be: Would you rather buy a good, reliable, fully loaded foreign car? Or a similarly priced, poorer quality, American car that just happens to have a bit more horsepower but lacks all the cool inside comforts? :D

      --
      ...
    23. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by bwalling · · Score: 5, Informative

      The reason that you're going to get a dozen replys from the Apple "amen corner" is that you very clearly don't get it. If you could buy a Yugo for $5000 or a Honda for $5500, which one would you want? Sure, you could say that Dell is better than Yugo, but you'd still be missing the point.

      Apple's hardware is better than the bottom basement x86 crap. Dell is using the lowest bidder, and changing monthly. Apple is consistently using the same hardware. This is important for two reasons. First, Apple can make sure the drivers work well. In the x86 world, drivers are a mess, written by the company that made the hardware. You have no guarantee of quality, and that is partially what makes Windows unstable. Second, if the hardware sucks, Apple will drop them.

      More importantly, Apple's software is better. OS X is very pleasant to use. It's powerful for advanced users, and simple for novices. The bundled apps are easier to use. Plug and play works very well. Your mom's camera will just work without special drivers and special helper apps for downloading the images (yes, some digicams just work under Windows, but my Canon required a whole suite of applications to get the damn pictures from it).

      What you seem to not understand is that these things have a value. In fact, they are worth at least the $50 price difference to many people. The fact that people find value in this shouldn't bother you. You shouldn't feel some compelling need to point out that an apple and an orange have different prices. Many people want a Mac. You seem to think that people want a computer.

    24. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by GtKincaid · · Score: 1

      People who think this is overpriced are missing a fair few things here sure you could get a headless dell for less but it wouldnt have the design quality it certainly wouldnt have a power requirment of 80W It wouldnt be nearly as quiet as the mac mini It would certainly take up a hell of alot more deskspace It wouldnt run OSX(With pearpc you could ,but that is very slow and kind of a mute point as its emulation) the chances of it having firewire , would be slim so before you judge it on price and performance alone , try and find a pc that will compare with all that (well except running OSX) not to mention the high quality combo drive ( or superdrive if you wish)

    25. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by idiotism · · Score: 1

      that is the most ignorant comment i have ever seen. comapring a mac powerpc processor to a dell with a pentium? twit.

    26. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Yaztromo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Of course, if I don't get modded to hell, there will be a dozen replys from the Apple "amen corner" telling me that the Apple is a better deal, etc.

      I won't tell you which system is the better value for you, but let's for the pure fun of things look at that Mac Mini's software, and then figure out from there what you're paying for the naked hardware, okay?

      Let's see -- the Mac Mini comes with (with prices listed at Apple's Online Store in brackets (using all USD prices):

      • Mac OS X v10.3 ($129)
      • iLife 05 ($79)
      • AppleWorks ($79)
      • Quicken 2005 ($69.95)
      • Nanosaur 2 ($24.95)
      • Marrble Blast Gold ($19.95)

      For a grand total of $401.85 if you were to just buy the software alone, leaving the hardware portion costing you only $97.15 . When you factor in the fact you don't need to outfit the system with firewall or anti-virus software, it looks like one damn fine deal to me.

      Yaz.

    27. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by ceeam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1. It does not run MacOS-X.
      2. It's not tiny.
      3. It's not fanless.
      4. It does not run MacOS-X.

      Crap. Order Mac mini w/ 512 megs of RAM and you have _fully_blown_ modern computer that everyone can use and that you can carry in your pocket (I'm sure it would fit in my coat's).

    28. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by talieos · · Score: 0
      that won't require me to sit in front of it removing spyware

      Then for XP don't give them Admin privs on their normal accounts. It's not that hard to teach people to use the Admin account only for installing software.

      Bottom line, it comes down to what UI you like better, and software availability. For most people either platform would work fine.

    29. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Angostura · · Score: 1

      Also worth factoring the bundled iLife apps. They really are very good.

      Definitely worth NOT going for teh 1 Gig Apple installed memory though. Get a dealer to fit memory afterwards (although I'm happy with 512Mb on this old G4).

    30. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by ClippyHater · · Score: 1

      If you're the one setting up the machine for your mother, and you set up Windows XP, then SHAME on you for not making Mozilla the default browser and installing AntiVirus and turning on automatic updates. For shame.

      My XP machine has visited some of the less savory sites on the web.

      Spyware to date: 0
      Viruses to date: 0

      A solid, easy to use, trouble free WinXP machine IS possible, you just have to take precautions (more so than other platforms, of course). This is NOT an onerous thing to do.

    31. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by spleck · · Score: 1

      This $500 Apple is still insanely overpriced.

      For a Macintosh, this is cheap.

      You meant to say, "This $500 computer is still insanely overpriced." The cheapest Mac prior to this was nearly twice the cost, AND it wasn't small enough for most PC users to add it to their desk to try out the Macintosh, which is the whole point of this machine.

      Too bad Cringley wasn't right. A $250 subsidized Mac would put an insane dent into marketshare.

    32. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Mudcathi · · Score: 2, Funny
      But, most importantly, what tasks can you, as a user, do with a $500 PC that you can't with the $500 Mac?

      Defrag?

      --

      "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

    33. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Err, you DO know that other companies besides Apple make displays, right?

      Those displays will work with the mini. So will pretty much any USB keyboard and mouse. And this machine is targeted rather specifically at people who already have a keyboard, mouse, and display.

      Some people will piss and moan about anything, I swear.

    34. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Still, the mini looks cool, I hope to buy one (used in the far future from ebay for hopefully about $20). 300MHz G3 B&W Powermacs are still going for $150-$200 and they're ancient. Expect to wait around 10-15 years for your $20 Mac Mini. Macs seem to hold their value really well so I don't feel bad about spending extra on it. My PC on the other hand is obsolete and loses 90% of it's value the first 6 months.

    35. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Delphix · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah, no one develops software for OS X. Oh... wait a minute! Yes they do!

      Check out VersionTracker. I think you'll find more than you need or want. Considering the list of updated packages updated on any given day scrolls through several pages, I don't think you'll have to crack out gcc everytime you want some new softawre. ;-)

    36. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Monokeros · · Score: 1

      Still, the mini looks cool, I hope to buy one (used in the far future from ebay for hopefully about $20).

      Good luck. G4 Cubes are still going for $300-400 on eBay.

      They've been discontinued for, what, 4 years now? Maybe people still pay a premium because it was discontinued. If that's the reason then in the interests of your dream, I hope they don't discontinue the Mac Mini.

      --
      The Statue of Liberty is America's lawn jockey.
    37. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dell is NOT better than Yugo. Yugo makes much better cars than Dell.

    38. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Firewire? USB HiSpeed? DVDROM? DVI?

      How about size? (The Dell is the size of 50 Mac mini's)? How about noise? My Dell Dimension at work is louder than the HVAC.

      And on the model with the free monitor you get less memory, slower memory bus, and smaller hard disk...

      And the "on site" warranty only applies to the one with the free 17 inch monitor - but not the other two (the other two are better computers but come with not as much stuff).

      Those aren't bad deals - but I think they are in an entirely different market or demographic...

    39. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by RichMeatyTaste · · Score: 1

      DVD Rom adds less than $20 to the price.

      XP Pro is NOT needed. XP Pro only adds domain integration capabilities.

      Quicken can be had for nearly free on sale

      The PC comes with WordPerfect for free. Not perfect but it works.

      I'll give you the Video editing suite. But then again not every Mac user needs it.

      --


      Ever feel like you are driving the getaway car?
    40. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Ummm - most people DO want a computer. That's why Macs have a 2% or so market share. Ony a tiny minority of folks want a mac, or even care what kind of computer they have as long as it is cheap, and will allow them to send email and surf the web.

    41. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by midknight32 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact you get a TON of software with the Mini and OSX. How much software comes with the Dell? Yeah, thought so...

      Unfortunately you get wayyyy too much, and what you get sucks to use, even if you exclude the spyware...

    42. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by smallguy78 · · Score: 1

      Plus it's styled like a biscuit tin, which all mums like.

      --
      Nothing costs nothing
    43. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      XP-Pro (at least)
      OS X becomes outdated in a year. Punch down $129 more for a new version. Windows XP will probably have updates for at least another 5 years. If old versions of OS X will have updates remains to be seen. Versions from 2001 have glaring security holes still open.

      DVD-ROM
      Valid. Add $20

      Quicken 2005
      Office
      Video editing suite

      And why exactly should you add in MS office for the price of the computer. Is MS office included in every mini sold, Is quicken included? Why not download openoffice instead? From what I heard there are some kind of video editing software included in windows if you need it.

      While we are at it why not add in some cash for at least a keyboard for that mac mini, or are you using telepathy?

    44. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Dougie+Cool · · Score: 1

      But, most importantly, what tasks can you, as a user, do with a $500 PC that you can't with the $500 Mac?

      Half Life 2.
      Right-click.
      Start-R For Run.
      Upgrade.

      --
      ~~Every few years or so I'm accidentally fashionable!
    45. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by CdXiminez · · Score: 1

      But, most importantly, what tasks can you, as a user, do with a $500 PC that you can't with the $500 Mac?

      The question is not really what you can and can't do with a Mac, but that you can do it faster.

      I can get more work done on a Mac in the same amount of time as on Windows, and that quickly makes up for the slightly higher start price of most Macs.

    46. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by generic-man · · Score: 1
      You remind me of the ads for computers ten years ago that came bundled with $1200 of software, yours FREE with purchase!

      Now start subtracting out the costs:
      • iLife has a movie editor, a DVD authoring program and a music composition program that I'll never use. I can't buy those separately, so now I'm "paying" $79 for iPhoto.
      • AppleWorks was so bad, Apple replaced it with iWork -- a "suite" that consists of a whopping two programs. OpenOffice is free, though the Mac version is VERY slow.
      • Quicken 2005 for Mac, at $70, has about the same feature set as Quicken 2005 Basic for Windows which costs $30.
      • Nanosaur and Marble Blast Gold are not games I would ever really care to buy anyway, so that's another $45 off the price.


      Now if you really want to play the numbers game, go through all the software that comes with Windows. The Mac doesn't even have a bundled solitaire game -- you have to buy one at the Apple Store for $20 or try VersionTracker for a free version. (I've tried all of them, and they're all terrible.) I could go on, but my POS PowerBook is in for repair and my Windows machine is long gone.

      Firewall programs are free (Windows and Mac both include one), and so are anti-virus programs (AVG for Windows).
      --
      For more information, click here.
    47. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XP-pro adds encryption and backup capabilities. I about had a cow when I couldn't back up my friend's xp-home system with a dying hard drive.

    48. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by agraupe · · Score: 1

      I have linux installed and working on my Powerbook, a machine from before Apple made it not insanely hard to install Linux. You will only miss out on some of the linux commercial programs (and I believe some come for ppc). There are a wide variety of ppc distros, and linux remains the only OS to support full 64-bit computing (although it won't affect the mac mini). I'm looking at (in the future) ditching my x86 cheap box, and buying this, in addition to keeping my Windows box for games. This is the first mac I might actually consider.

    49. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, and as we all know, you must use an Apple-branded monitor with this thing, because Apple chose to go with this goofy proprietary video format (DVI/VGA), rather than an RF modulator box like my uber-cool Vic20 uses.

      Or I suppose you could shop around to see if anybody else makes monitors with these "VGA" connectors. That might just be wishful thinking on my part, though.

    50. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Build it yourself, choosing each component for yourself.

      There are kit cars too. Most people would rather buy a Toyota.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    51. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by justins · · Score: 1, Insightful
      But, most importantly, what tasks can you, as a user, do with a $500 PC that you can't with the $500 Mac?

      Expand the pathetic base 256MB of RAM without voiding the warranty, for starters.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    52. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Nova1313 · · Score: 1

      why not try a noise canceling usb headset ^^

      --
      There exists some positive integer N that you are the Nth person to read this signature.
    53. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're comparing a cheapo noisy Dell to a computer that fits in the palms of your hands? Uh, OK.

    54. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by RMH101 · · Score: 1
      aside from the software aspects:

      * use line in
      * get a video card with TV out for HTPC use
      * get optical audio out so i can watch DVDs in surround sound
      * cheaply add wireless or bluetooth
      * add any PCI cards i like
      * install a TV tuner card in it

      shall i go on?

    55. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by tyndyll · · Score: 1
      I am not a Mac zealot. I do not own a Mac. I have never owned a Mac. I want a Mac Mini

      Why? True, they may not be the fastest mover on the block, nor have the biggest hard drives etc, but the extra premium is worth it for the damn style of the thing. I'll not be switching myself over from a PC to be using this exclusively. My plans for it involve it sitting nicely in the living room beside the PS2, DVD and Gamecube hooked into the TV and stereo playing MAME and other emulators and as a networked mp3/Ogg Jukebox.

      I don't think its really fair to compare it to the headless Dell. A better comparison is possibly a *complete* Mini-ITX setup. With case/board/memory/HD how does the price balance out?

      --
      Morale seems good, considering, although high spirits are just no substitute for eight hundred rounds a minute
    56. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by standards · · Score: 1

      At first I agreed with you, but then I read that the Mac mini is VGA compatible. You can buy a Mac mini-compatible monitor for $67 at Staples!

      And I also learned that the Mac Mini uses USB - and quickly found that you can buy a USB keyboard and mouse for under $10 total.

      So there is no need to buy a top-of-the-line equipment for a Mac mini. You can attach it to commodity hardware. In fact, I have a number of VGA monitors in the basement... if anyone wants one, let me know.

    57. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by sgant · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately you get wayyyy too much, and what you get sucks to use, even if you exclude the spyware...

      Care to expand on this? What spyware specifically? List examples please.

      Also, you say that it sucks to use, please again, give examples on what sucks to use and your reviews of using them.

      Thanks

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    58. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Angostura · · Score: 1

      Oh, just checked - a few things to note

      The Dell has XP Home on it, and only has a CD ROM drive (v a CD Writer/DVD-ROM combo). It has no speakers (OK, the Mac Mini's inbuilt is probably crap, but still, a beep's a beep).

      The Dell has an integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 900, which wouldn't be my choice.

      Oh and the Mac Mini has a 56k modem (OK, big deal, I wish this was swappable for an 802.11, but still).

    59. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by jpmahala · · Score: 2
      play doom3


      You can't buy a graphics card that will play Doom3 (well) for $499.

    60. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Moby+Cock · · Score: 1

      You are gonna need a USB hub though. A decent one will run you about $30 - $50. The keyboard and mouse will fill up the existing USB ports.

      Here's a question: I'm not a Mac guy (although, I may be soon with prices like this). Do standard (i.e. Best Buy available) USB hubs work on Mac. My instinct is that its no problem, but I thought I'd ask.

    61. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by koreaman · · Score: 2, Informative

      XP-Pro -- No just get Linux instead
      DVD-ROM-- Cheap
      Quicken 2k5 -- GNU Cash
      Office -- OOo
      Video editing suite -- If you need to do heavy video editing you shouldn't be buying a $500 computer anyway.

    62. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by NicM · · Score: 1

      > This $500 Apple is still insanely overpriced.

      The BBC says it's £339 in the UK. That's $639.

      $499 or $265 in the US.

      £130 extra? Fuck you, Apple.

    63. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by godlikenerddotcom · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that. I'd love to see it. Those video cards in $500 PCs are hot stuff!

    64. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but my point stands. If you're a hardware enthusiast, Macs are out of the question.

    65. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by koreaman · · Score: 1

      So what if they like the UI better?
      And you absolutely need root (or admin, whatever) to do daily tasks in XP.

    66. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...And every so often the engine on that poorer quality car stalls on the interstate, the only colors available for the interior are flourescent green and blue (unless you get some aftermarket help), the tires are crap, for some reason carjackers are ALWAYS in the car, and oh, you wanted brakes that work when travelling faster than 70mph? That's extra.

    67. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by dirty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And then a good number of applications just don't work. I forget the link, but Microsoft themselves found that about 50% of all Windows software would not work out of the box unless you're an admin. I used to setup computer machines, and the amount of permissions I had to change was insane. You'd be amazed at how many programs want to write to c:\program files\... .

      --

      -matt
    68. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by godlikenerddotcom · · Score: 2, Informative

      > I can't plug in my microphone or stereo in the Mac since Apple decided to skip the line in... Get an iMic for the microphone. $30. There's a headphone hack, plug/adapt that into your stereo.

    69. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by way2trivial · · Score: 1
      and you do know, they UP THE COST right?

      I can get a comparable dell, with LCD monitor, for less than the apple mini

      I still want one.

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    70. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Horse+Rotorvator+JAD · · Score: 1

      Places that are selling 300MHz G3's for $150-$200 are ripping you off. Thirty seconds on google found a Power Mac G3 266MHz with 448 MB RAM for a mere $50.00 http://www.retrobox.com/rbwww/home/unit_view.asp?i d=1048890&bin_id=world. It is not 300MHz but it is close enough.

    71. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by NicM · · Score: 1

      Oops. It's £75. Duh.

      Still a a ripoff.

    72. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by reachinmark · · Score: 1

      One cost that people often seem to ignore with the old Mac vs Windows comparisons is for developers: xCode is a very advanced IDE for development and comes free with the OS. Microsoft Visual Studio, on the other hand, costs around $1,000.

    73. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Agret · · Score: 1

      I just can't decipher if parts of that are sarcasm or not your post is very confusing please re-post with proper [sarcasm] [end sarcasm] tags.

      --
      Have you metaroderated recently?
    74. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple usually give 2 USB ports on the machine and build a HUB into the keyboard, so you actually still have two USB ports when you've plugged them in. One free in the back of the machine, and one free on the keyboard (which also gets you a nice convinient port round the front of the machine).

      If you choose another vendor for keyboard you may need the HUB.

    75. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Usb hubs work just fine. Firewire one too, for that matter.

      But why not do it the "Mac" way, and get a keyboard with a built in 1 or 2 port hub for your mouse?

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    76. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by pstudent12 · · Score: 0

      You cannot get a comparable dell at any cost since dell does not run OS X.

    77. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by godlikenerddotcom · · Score: 1
      and you do know, they UP THE COST right?

      Good backpedaling. The cost of Apple's LCDs is more than other manufacturer's, but they're also some of the most color accurate LCDs out there. And yes, some people do find that important.

    78. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by mausmalone · · Score: 2, Insightful
      But, most importantly, what tasks can you, as a user, do with a $500 PC that you can't with the $500 Mac?
      Given that the $500 mac doesn't come with a monitor, keyboard, or mouse, I can do a lot of things with a $500 PC (like this one) that I can't do with a $500 mac, such as "using it", "seeing stuff", "typing stuff", and "clicking on things."
      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
    79. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Agret · · Score: 1

      So you've got to add: XP-Pro (at least) - $0.50 for the CD & about $5 of bandwidth DVD-ROM - $50 I think? Quicken 2005 - Who the hell uses that, i'll just say $0.50 for the cd & about $5 of bandwidth Office - $0.50 for the cd & about $5 of bandwidth Video editing suite - $0.50 for the cd & about $5 of bandwidth $52 in total Piracy makes things cheaper ;) Re-add with YOUR costs not MINE and see what you get.

      --
      Have you metaroderated recently?
    80. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      And isn't the target market for this computer people who already own a Windows machine and would like to switch over?

      I think it is even more specific than that...it is the Windows users who own an iPod and are asking themselves "why can't my computer work as easily and well as my iPod, and why can't my other software work as well as iTunes?".

    81. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

      Now that's what you call high-maintenance.
      Seriously, have you looked at the service contracts SGI pushes?

    82. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Er, a 2.8 GHz P4 is significantly faster than a G4 at less than half the clockspeed. In terms of raw computing power, the Mini isn't such a great deal. OTOH, you're not going to buy the mini for its raw computing power; you want it because of its form factor and, well, because it's cheap and probably reliable, and because it also runs an easy to use OS not plagued with viruses.

      As an office/websurfing machine, the Mini is Good Enough, and that's great. But fast and powerful? No.

    83. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by reachinmark · · Score: 1
      This $500 Apple is still insanely overpriced.

      Err, hang on, does your Dell weigh 1.5kg? Is it small enough to carry around with you when you travel, say, between home and the office? How much noise does your Dell make?

    84. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :D
      Quod Erat Demonstrandum.

      Damnit, I hate the religious fanboys, regardless of their conviction.

    85. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      You are gonna need a USB hub though. A decent one will run you about $30 - $50. The keyboard and mouse will fill up the existing USB ports.

      Not necessarily. There are several instances where you won't:

      • You have a Bluetooth mouse and/or keyboard (admittedly exceedingly rare),
      • You have a USB keyboard with a built-in hub, or
      • You don't have any need for other USB devices.

      Personally, if I were to buy one I already have an IBM USB mouse and keyboard, the latter of which has a built-in two port hub, allowing me to chain the mouse off the keyboard and have a port free on both the Mac mini and the keyboard for a digital camera and a Palm dock.

      Here's a question: I'm not a Mac guy (although, I may be soon with prices like this). Do standard (i.e. Best Buy available) USB hubs work on Mac. My instinct is that its no problem, but I thought I'd ask.

      Macs use 100% standard USB (in this case, USB 2), so yes -- you'll be just fine. You'll want to ensure you have a USB 2 hub if you want to use USB 2 speeds, of course, but otherwise any off-the-shelf USB hub will work (same goes for the Firewire port and Firewire hubs).

      Yaz.

    86. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by notbob · · Score: 0

      Apple Pro Keyboard has a USB hub in it, with 2 usb ports on it.

      So plug keyboard in 1 port on back, mouse in 1 plug on keyboard, still 2 spots left open.

    87. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by godlikenerddotcom · · Score: 1
      Defrag?

      1. You can defrag a Mac if you have that burning need to that you feel in your loins.

      2. It's hardly as necessary with HFS+ (at least compared with FAT filesystems).

    88. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong. n00b cunt.

    89. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1
      This $500 Apple is still insanely overpriced. GotApex? has a "headless Dell" on their site for $449.
      It is worth noting, however, that you can probably fit around 10+ Mac Minis in the same volume that that Dell chassis takes. I don't know if you didn't RTFA, but the Mac Mini is 6.5x6.5x2 (inches).

      If you want a PC with the same physical configuration, you'll probably pay the same price for a MiniITX computer that has considerably worse performance.

      Furthermore, this is also an advance in Mac pricing. I don't think Apple has ever sold computers this cheap before. It'll probably make many more people consider getting a Mac instead of a PC the next time they buy a new computer.

    90. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Xerp · · Score: 1

      I have no idea about this whole Windows malarky, but I'm certainly going to get one of these little babies! Just 2 inches tall (mm.. love the unit of measurement).

      Best of all; check this out - I get one of these and I get a life! OK, its Apple so they call it iLife, but hey.

    91. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by LiquidRaptor · · Score: 1

      What does that have to do with not being able to plug in devices to get sound ONTO the mac?

    92. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by PPGMD · · Score: 1
      No XP Pro installs the backup utility by default, it's an optional component that you can install (if you have the XP disc).

      Microsoft figures, correctly IMO, that 90% of the XP Home users won't use the backup tool, and doesn't install it.

    93. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by angrist · · Score: 1

      OSX Automatically defrags while it's in use, every time you open a file smaller than.. 20 megs IIRC (which is MOST files you'll be using), it relocated it.

      Also, any time you install or update software from apple, that "Optimizing System Performance" defrags as well (along with a few other things too).

      The need to defrag a windows box every other week is just the result of poor design choices made by microsoft.

    94. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A tiny minority knows what they want and what is right for them... you tool. Most people don't know shit and get what their friends get or whats "compatible", as I said' you're a tool.

    95. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by jrwillis · · Score: 1

      Like hell you do. Tell that to the 800 or so 2k boxes I admin.

      --
      Keep Austin Weird!
    96. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      install lots of spyware and send out LOTS of spam mail with only a few mouse clicks?

    97. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      yup, they oughtta work just fine. that's where the U(niversal) part of USB comes in ;-) same for most input devices.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    98. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be the old "beige" G3, which is a full two years older.

    99. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      get a video card with TV out for HTPC use

      Why would you want TV out for an HTPC? You'd want DVI--which the Mini has.

      For the rest of your points, wireless and bluetooth are BTO options for the Mini, or you can do either via USB. Your audio points would also be addressed by USB.

    100. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when did $39.99 start getting rounded down to $30? Anyway, it's crap spending money on stuff like this.

    101. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plug and play works very well. Your mom's camera will just work without special drivers and special helper apps for downloading the images (yes, some digicams just work under Windows, but my Canon required a whole suite of applications to get the damn pictures from it).

      Heh, that reminds me of trying to plug my camera into my dad's Dell with Windows ME (not exactly the latest version of windows, I know). After getting down on the floor to plug the camera into the oddly angled, flap covered USB ports that some Dell desktops have (those things are impossible), I hook it up and turn the camera on. This causes the computer to shut down. It didn't freeze, it was just a normal shut down. I, for one, found this quite humorous.

    102. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by CountBrass · · Score: 1
      I can get a comparable dell

      Really? Comparable? One that runs OSX and is about the save of a hardback novel, almost silent and weighs a couple of kilos?

      I think you're lying.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    103. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by slapout · · Score: 1

      Video editing suite -- If you need to do heavy video editing you shouldn't be buying a $500 computer anyway.

      I think this computer is targeted more at people who want to edit home movies.

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    104. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      How would one get in touch with you?

      and where are you?

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    105. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Jahz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Half Life 2. True. This pisses me off. Alot of great games are ported to Mac, like the Unreal series and many many more.
      Verdict: true

      Right-click.

      100% INCORRECT. OSX supports right-click right out of the box. Its just that Apple mice dont have two-buttons. Actually, you can hit the option key and click with an apple mouse to get the right-click functionality. But note that the mini mac DOES NOT SHIP with an apple mouse. So go out and get a MS optical wheel mouse or use your current usb/ps2 mouse and you will have right-click. Verdict: false

      Start-R For Run.

      Your joking, right?
      You shouldnt even need to do that. In OSX I can start any OSX App using only the keyboard in 3-5 keystrokes. Do this COMMAND+Shift+A (open apps folder) then type the first letter of the App, OSX highlights it, now COMMAND+Down (or +O) to run it. You may need the second letter of the name too is many apps are similiarly named. Naturally, you can also use the Terminal to open unix apps as fast or faster than Start-R.
      Verdict: True, but Mac's can accomplish the same goal quicker

      Upgrade. The above were attacks on Mac's. This is about the Mini Mac and iMac's. The MiniMac's have memory upgrade ability only. This machine is geared at people as a "My first Mac." If you like, it Apple hopes you will by an iMac (that would be your upgrade).

      Things you cant do on a Wintel PC:
      - See all you app windows with a single-keypress (expose)
      - Flurry screensaver :-)
      - Open .doc files right out of the box (aka no Word needed)
      - Run X app's natively.
      - Terminal. enough said.
      - Turn on fully configured FTP, HTTP, SSH and file sharing servers by simply checking a check-box.
      - Setup virtually any bluetooth device in 4 or fewer click's
      - Once click internet connection sharing between wireless and wired lan that doesnt involve complex bridging and an hour of clicking.
      - Tons of well-made and stable productivity applications bundles
      and finally, - type ls

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
    106. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by CountBrass · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also you can play "Hunt The Virus" and "Spyware Fishing" and "Patch the latest security vulnerability in IE".

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    107. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by godlikenerddotcom · · Score: 1

      Shall I go on?

    108. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know they PROVIDE VALUE, right?

      The software package that comes with it including iLife is sweet,

      The machine itself it going to have less headaches than a Dell running XP. My Dell running XP gets seemingly daily security updates pushed to it, which is annoying in itself, but the latest required accepting a EULA and now is falsely flagging legitimate apps as spyware...what a mess.

      I have Linux home servers, and I was going to put Linux on this machine too, but I do my videocam editing on this box so it's my last Windows holdout.

      Now, I think I'd be better off getting a Mac Mini. All the software I'd need comes with it.

    109. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure it's more expensive in terms of raw computing power unless this $450 "Headless Dell" comes with a real Radeon/nVidia level graphics card.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    110. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called shopping around. I thought all PC fanboys loved doing that.

    111. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by clontzman · · Score: 2

      Macs seem to hold their value really well so I don't feel bad about spending extra on it.

      I've always found this to be a really weird argument. Who buys a computer because it "keeps its value" (read: replacing it is just as expensive as when I bought it)? The great thing about the commodity PC market is that prices keep going down. Sure, your old PC isn't worth anything, but you can get a spiffy new one for less money as well. As a consumer, that's a good thing, not a bad thing.

      I kinda like a world where a 3GHz P4 with a gig of RAM is less than a thousand bucks myself, but Mac folks seem to like that a top-end machine starts at about $1,500 because they have this illusion that it's an investment.

    112. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I am not a fan of windows but come on.

      Xp has a "video editing suite"

      the MAC does not come with anything like Premiere or any full fledged video editing suite. That's like saying that the MAC paint program is equal to Photoshop. It,s not. the built in OSX video editing is as cheezy as the built in XP video editing. it's great for the drooling masses but is utter crap to us that use AVID or other higher capability editing apps.

      Also, OSX does not come with Quicken but a cut rate substitute, but the cut rate XP boxes do come with the microsoft works and Money pack... which is just as cut rate as what comes free with any computer. Every single cheapie PC i have touched have that installed, microsoft cant sell it so they give it away to the OEM's, and have done so for decades.

      Oh and Quicken is cheese, just like quickbooks. Try real accounting software.

      finally, when did OSX come with a complete copy of Microsoft office??? last I heard there was an off-branded "office-like" suite that came with it that was on par with Open Office, which happens' to be free.

      The only points you have are the DVD-ROM (and why? for $25.00 more you can get a DVD-+RW drive) and loosely the XP-PRO.

      but you forget one important thing... a DVD playing APP. XP WILL NOT play DVD's or mpeg2 video without buying an app and codec to do so.

      Do not read me wrong, I also reccomend people to buy MAC over a PC unless they are computer experts.

      you made a lot of assumptions that are flat out wrong.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    113. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by ducman · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's meant to be humorous, right?

      Right-click.

      Why not? Since the Mac OS 7.5 days you could replace the mouse that came with your machine and right-click. Now the Mac mini lets you chose your own first mouse, so just get one with two or more buttons.

      Start-R For Run.

      Are you suggesting you'd rather use Windows' limited little command line than a full Unix terminal? That you don't want the flexibility to choose your own shell (sh, csh, ksh, bash, etc.)? Or are you talking about the fact that you have to use Start-R because Windows puts all of your programs in the Start menu, so you can't find the one you want. Then my question becomes, would you rather have to know and type the name of the executable, rather than have the Dock, which only contains the applications you use often, and use a Command-A in the Finder and jump to the Applications folder for the rest of them?

      Upgrade.

      Upgrade what? What do you want to add that doesn't plug in to either the Firewire or USB2.0 ports? If there really is something, Apple has a whole line of machines with multiple PCI or faster slots.

      --
      "We have nothing in common, your attitude annoys me, and your political views are appalling."
    114. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you said it like that im guessing you're talking about a work environment. In that case you're right, But on windows XP just to run alot of the progams you have to run as administrator or at the least power user. And I don't like giving my sister an administrative account because she can't use the software that came with her digital camera on her own computer.

    115. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1

      OMG What a rip off! The Radeon 9800 is $250!! Dood ! I can get a CompUSA brand one with the same amount of memory for $70!! Radeons are a total rip off!!!!

      *note that if you miss the obvious sarcasm and the larger point that component quality actually matters, then you deserve the Dell you buy.

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

    116. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you knew more than your nametag you would know that these are all wrong, except for HL2.

      HalfLife2 is the only reason a W2k partition still sits on my drive array, and is the only reason I boot that partition, thank you very much.

      Windows is just there to run a game (or two) for me and I'll bet a lot of other Linux and Mac users out there.

    117. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, firewire external devices fix your issue with audio (both line-in and optical out) if you so desire that. Wireless and bluetooth... USB adapters for whichever you prefer. TV out? Peasant. DVI is the standard way to do that and that is native.

      Now as for adding any PC cards you like, compare this to a shuttle form factor.. you really just can't fit all that much in there. Besides, you can't complain about "any PCI cards" and "TV Tuner" as one is a sub-category of the other.

      You obviously have no idea about macs. Godamn you are a fucktard

      Please, do go on. Tell me about how you can't run any software... please.

    118. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      But, a lot of people consider Mac OS X to be worth a significant premium over Windows XP.

      You mean like - Mac owners?

      A lot more people (myself included) find it to be an uneeded expense for little gain. Breaking free of the PC hype here for a moment - I've been "blue screen/pop up/adware infested " free for years. To me it's a lot of FUD. Windows machines do get nailed - like my dad's did a few years back - a bit of education, and he's been free of those problems as well.

      So this "headless Mac" is still overpriced for its performance potential. Heck - I can get a laptop nowadays for the same price.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    119. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      £330.21 (not £339) is about $620.

      $120 difference (£63).

      Not bad for Apple, who normally operate on a £1=$1 conversion. The probably saw what that did to their ipod sales over here and thought better of it.

      Still sucks that we get charged a premium though.

    120. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by elecngnr · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder if people who tell me that a Mac is not worth the extra money value their time. I am willing to pay more for my Mac(s) because they simply work. I do not spend time worrying about it. I occassionally have to work on a Dell machine at work. It might only be a $500 machine, but I have to spend so much more time ensuring it is free from viruses, adware, spyware, malware, etc. In my opinion, all that time I have to spend babysitting this Dell could be better spent on my actual task.

      --
      Having done so much with so little for so long, I now can do anything with nothing at all.
    121. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Have you ever heard a Dell? No?

      Yes, I have. And it won't shut up.

    122. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by DenDave · · Score: 1

      Ever owned a Porsche?
      now that's high maintenance...

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    123. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by phats+garage · · Score: 1

      While I agree that theres a market for macs, I guess there would need to be a compelling reason for me to want one. There always seems to be a price premium on those things so mac customers are by neccesity going to be those who don't mind paying. I guess in that case, I put up with the x86's and the downsides of missing out on the mac experience. Theres certainly no drought of software for x86's and no killer mac app that compells me to buy one.

    124. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Vague+but+True · · Score: 1
      But, most importantly, what tasks can you, as a user, do with a $500 PC that you can't with the $500 Mac?

      Let's see...spyware, viruses, BSOD...

      --

      I'm not a doctor, but I play one in bed.

    125. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by HaloZero · · Score: 1

      The difference is that you are an educated, savvy user. That is laudable. The problem lies in the fact that some people simply do not know any better, and honestly, don't care to. My XP machine has also had a very limited number of spyware or virus infections; the few that I have had were from either someone else using my machine for 'five minutes to check their email', or that one wonderful time at the LAN party when some dork cabled my machine for me, and didn't put it through the firewall first. Thank you, w32.nachi.

      The point remains, I do still worry about the latest DCOM exploit or whatever that may be lurking in the shadows, ready to unleash only god-knows-what on my box. Well, atleast when I use my Windows box, anyway.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    126. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      VAT and customs import duty...

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    127. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, you forgot for the Mini Mac:

      Monitor: $300+
      Keyboard and mouse: $100
      Bluetooth/Wireless to use keyboard and mouse: $150 (don't remember precisely)
      Upgrade to 80 GB HD and 512MB+ RAM: $200

      This pushes the price up a lot.

      Not to say I'm not interested. For $500 you can almost get a great little computer (and so stylish!) I heard that you may be able to hook these up to the firewire on your cablebox and record TV/HDTV directly! Viva la Mac!

    128. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by caddisfly · · Score: 2, Informative

      It appears that you are wrong - this is from Henry Norr reporting at macintouch.com:
      ------>
      I went back to the booth later and got a little more info on upgrading the Mac Mini.

      Apple "does not recommend" that users upgrade the memory themselves - you're supposed to have a service provider do it if you want to add more after purchase - but doing it yourself does not void the warranty unless you damage something. A booth person told me the memory slot is easily accessible once you get the case open.
      -------

      I doubt intel OEMs honor warranties if you end up "toasting" the machine

    129. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by CrkHead · · Score: 1
      CPU - OK, the "headless Dell" is faster.
      I really don't think you have a valid comparison. The Dell will be listed with a higher clock speed, but that is not how you compare x86 to PPC.
    130. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by SkipRosebaugh · · Score: 1

      Did you even look at the list of included software? It clearly lists "Quicken 2005 for Mac", so unless you consider the mac version to be a cut-rate substitute, you're wrong. Yeah, it comes with AppleWorks, but in my experience, most Macs also come with a 60 day trial of MS Office. And AppleWorks will do just about anything you need to do. Also, last I checked, XP's Windows Media Player could play DVDs. It's crap, but it does work.

    131. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Newer apps are a lot better. I run as non-priv at home, and the only thing I need Admin for is games. So for those I use Run As from my non-priv context. Not even that annoying. If I'm not playing a game, I can go w/o privs indefinitely.



      Upshoot is, even doing Run As for games, I'm still not surfing the web and reading mail as Admin.



      On the mac when anything wants root, it prompts for a password, which most users will cheerfully and promptly give.

    132. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Xyde · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck buys a $499 PC to play doom 3? That's like buying a hyundai excel for racing.

    133. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by nolife · · Score: 1

      Dell has deals cheaper then the one in the comparison. This one is only $429. 80GB HD and 512MB ram.
      I could care less what anyone buys but in every single Apple computer article that mentions price, people compare prices of Dell to Apple and always seem to quote Dell prices that are always higher then what you can get from Dell directly. I do not know if this is on purpose or people just don't realize Dell has deals that rotate. I do not own a Dell but I have recently got out of the white box building side business and I point people to Dell instead. It saves me the hassle of providing free lifetime support. Of the 30 or so people I have quided in this direction, no one has been displeased at all with the quality of what they recieved. I personally think Dell support is lame but on par with every single tech support center I have ever called for anything.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    134. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that quicken 2005 for MAC is a TRIAL version!

      i suggest that both of you do more research!

      XP windows media player sill NOT play DVD's it complains about a missing codec that you need to download... that oops, costs you $4.95 to download.

      Mac is better in every way, but it is certianly not head and shoulders above the rest in the bundled apps, give it it's strength where it belongs, IT IS NOT WINDOWS and that is the biggest strength anyone could ask for.

    135. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Yes I want a computer but the Mac is a Computer.
      It has BSD unix as the base and a truly nice UI on top. I use Linx and XP everyday but this Mac really makes me want to get one. as to the price. $500 for a computer seems to be about right. I paid $595 for my Commodore 64 in 1982.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    136. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Altus · · Score: 1


      wow... what a brilliant way to make absolutely sure that no home user will ever use it!

      I wish they would do that with the rest of windows

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    137. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by koreaman · · Score: 1

      IHBT

    138. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by sparkster812 · · Score: 1

      Windows has updates, doesn't really include new features, and those updates do in fact like to break things - SP2, anyone? When OS X 10.2 was out, I used a friend's copy and detested it. Too slow. When 10.3 came out, there was more responsiveness and more stability. I've heard many others say the same thing.

      At least with OS X, whether I want to upgrade or do a clean install, I can use the same install cds. I'm not forced to install a previous version, then upgrade. [Aside from with those upgrade only disks, but I'm speaking of the version you spend $129, or $69 education, which is a good deal, IMO]

      People include MS Office in their pricing just because Macs come with AppleWorks, or what is now iWork, as an all-in-one office suite. Windows doesn't have anything of that nature, and OOo is still really not quite ready for the average user just yet.

    139. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by malthusan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you'd be doing those things on a Dell. Ewww.

    140. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Psykechan · · Score: 1

      I'll agree here with the software argument. When I buy a computer, I only factor in the price for bundled software that I would actually purchase. In the case of the Mac Mini, it's only Panther.

      For solitaire on the Mac, I just used KPatience (kpat) which is available for a quick binary download through Fink Commander. It's a few more steps but I think it's one of the best solitaire programs out there.

    141. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Altus · · Score: 1


      your right! why wait a year... windows XP is outdated now!

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    142. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      No it is 549 and you have to send in a pain in the butt rebate and hope that you get it sent in on time and have all your paperwork done and that they do not loose it. Then wait for them to send you a check.
      Frankly is $50 that much to pay for not having to deal with that.
      Yes the P4 is clocked faster but is it really that much faster? What about the video board?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    143. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Smitty825 · · Score: 1

      (Note: I'm typing this on my Powerbook) If you have ever used Quicken on the Mac and Quicken on Windows, then you would be familiar with how cut-rate Quicken Mac is. Quicken Mac does not support features that the Windows version has supported for years, the same bugs have been popping up since 2000 and is pretty much just a glorified calculator...

      (IMHO, of course)

      --

      Doh!
    144. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by SansTinfoilHat · · Score: 1

      Do you write late night tv commericals by any chance?

      a NINETY DOLLAR value yours for just $19.95!!!!

    145. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you what, I've been a PC user all my life, messed around with macintosh only a little. I always felt like I was overpaying, or I had to jump up to the next pricier level machine to get the features I wanted. Or, if I couldn't get those features, I'd rather have a pared down machine that cost less. But Apple never provided this. Now they have, so there was really no excuse anymore and I bought a Mac Mini.

      I still however, have a lot of friends who are semi-bigoted against the macintosh. I mentioned the Mac Mini to one of them, and the FIRST thing he said, I kid you not:

      "You can get a PC laptop for 500 dollars now. Why buy an Apple?"

      You will never, ever win against these people. There will always be something.

    146. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by nine-times · · Score: 1
      apples CHEAPEST monitor option is still a $1000 cinema display-

      Apple's displays are meant to be professional-level equipment. Yes, they're expensive, even for that size of LCD, but that's largely due to the fact that they have really good color-fidelity and such for graphic artists. In other words, don't go looking to Apple for cheap displays. But as others have noted, if you want a cheap LCD, you can still buy THAT from Dell and hook it up to your mini.

    147. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      Everything you buy is a personal value proposition. If you don't like the software that comes with it, by all means -- don't buy it.

      But don't try to extrapolate from your personal needs to that of everyone. A typical family that has some digital media devices (a DV camcorder, digital camera, iPod), who has an old PC will find some excellent value from this system. Using their existing monitor, keyboard and mouse they'll be able to plop in a relatively powerful media management system, surf the web, download music to their iPod, and let the kids do their homework without any additional cost.

      For those PC users here who like to bitch about being able to buy cheaper PCs, do any of you really buy these cheap machines, or do you just like to sit around and point them out?

      Personally, I wouldn't touch a cheap PC with a 10m clown pole. They are cheap for a reason, and I'm a power user who buys power equipment. But I am at least rational enough to know that not everyone has the same needs or desires I do.

      Yaz.

    148. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by nine-times · · Score: 1
      Breaking free of the PC hype here for a moment - I've been "blue screen/pop up/adware infested " free for years. To me it's a lot of FUD.

      As an IT pro managing a helpdesk with a mixed Windows/OSX population, I can tell you it's not a lot of FUD. There may be some FUD mixed in with it, but spyware has become a hell of a thing, and the fact that MS made their OS so that their web browser and media player can install programs doesn't help. But oh, wait-- it must not be a problem, because *your Dad* is fine.

      Now I'm not saying you need to use OSX, but I try to avoid Windows where I can. And it so happens that OSX is quite a good desktop OS.

    149. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth a friend of mine swears she got a virus on her G4 laptop browsing porn. Granted it could just be a rogue extension or something like that, but it's wreaking havoc on her computer. And, since "macs dont get viruses" she's not been able to find a scanner or cleaner type of program to get rid of it.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    150. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Oliver+Aaltonen · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the VIA EPIA MII 12000 is as slow as molasses.

    151. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by chrono325 · · Score: 1
      ... My MiniMac (pinkie in the air) ships the 22th.

      Damn! You are lucky, mine doesnt ship till the 3th!

    152. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's hear it again for bwalling:

      AMEN!!

      AAAMMENNN!!

    153. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      OS X becomes outdated in a year. Punch down $129 more for a new version.

      You do know that upgrades are optional, right? It's not like Panther is going to stop working on 6/30.

      If old versions of OS X will have updates remains to be seen.

      No, it doesn't. Apple routinely releases security patches for Jaguar. Cheetah and Puma were end-of-lifed quickly; nobody should be running either of those any more.

      Is MS office included in every mini sold

      AppleWorks is, so you have to include something that's comparable to that. Whether that's Office or something else, I have no idea.

      Is quicken included?

      Yes.

      Why not download openoffice instead?

      Because it's a terrible, terrible piece of software for starters. For seconds, you've just offset the dollar-cost of something like AppleWorks for the time-and-trouble-cost of some piece of freeware that you get off some random Web site. So much for being a good out-of-the-box experience, huh?

      From what I heard there are some kind of video editing software included in windows if you need it.

      Not really. What comes with Windows is more along the lines of two VHS decks strung together with RF adapters. And you can only record on Microsoft tape.

      While we are at it why not add in some cash for at least a keyboard for that mac mini

      Apple did. The Apple wired keyboard used to be $49. Now it's $29. Apple gave people who buy minis a $20 discount on a keyboard. Same with the mouse, incidentally.

    154. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      XP-Pro -- No just get Linux instead

      Hang on a sec. Let's just take a step back. Are you seriously comparing Linux and Mac OS X? I mean, I know that they're both computer operating systems, but aside from that, are you seriously thinking of them as equivalent? Have you ever used Mac OS X? For that matter, have you ever used Linux?

      You're comparing a first-class ticket on a 747 to the back seat of a crop-duster. Yes, one costs more than the other, but seriously, you get what you pay for.

      DVD-ROM-- Cheap

      True.

      Quicken 2k5 -- GNU Cash

      Wow. I'm not the world's biggest fan of Quicken --I find that a pencil and my bank card statement work as well for me--but now you're comparing that seat on a 747 to the back of a horse.

      Office -- OOo

      "Bryan, there's a message in my Alphabits! It says 'Oooooo!'"

      "Peter, those are Cheerios."

      Seriously, man, what's "Oooo" supposed to mean?

      Video editing suite -- If you need to do heavy video editing you shouldn't be buying a $500 computer anyway.

      Let's flash back five years, huh? "If you need to listen to compressed music files, you shouldn't be buying a $500 computer anyway." How much sense would that have made? How about going back 20 years. "If you need to us more than one font on a page, you shouldn't be buying a $500 computer anyway."

      Every parent in America has a mini-DV camera. Every parent in America wants to put their movies of little Junior on DVD. And every parent in America wants the ability to do so without shelling out a quarter of a million bucks on a Fire system.

      What people do with their computers has changed a bit since 1981. Might want to think about catching up with the rest of the class.

    155. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      OS X is the killer Mac app. You need to try it for a week before you bash it, seriously. You know how people here on Slashdot are constantly raving about how great it is? They're not wrong, it really is that great.

      Imagine BeOS, but more stylish with more hardware support and with a hell of a lot more developer support. That's close to what OS X is like.

    156. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      But, most importantly, what tasks can you, as a user, do with a $500 PC that you can't with the $500 Mac?
      Contract viruses?

    157. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by generic-man · · Score: 1

      "Macs don't get viruses," but Symantec will sell you software designed to combat them anyway.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    158. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That's like buying a hyundai excel for racing.

      Even worse, some morons race Honda Civics! WTF is wrong with kids these days? Oh well, it is safer racing a slow car than it was racing GTO's and V8 Mustangs like we did when I was in high school.

    159. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by mausmalone · · Score: 1

      hahaha... I tend to agree. But if you're only willing to pay $500 for a computer, you can't really be that picky.

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
    160. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by splatterboy · · Score: 1

      Did it ever occur to you there are things outside of apples control re:price?

      Dollar-pound conversion, import/export, licensing/legal issues and trade imbalance issues are government jurisdiction. Blame the shrub for that not apple...

      Is anything ever going to be a 1=1 conversion? Not until we share a common currency and international shipping rates are free.

      Are higher UK sales tax rates another apple "rip-off"?

      If you don't want one, can't afford one-fine, don't buy one, but please come up with a real reason.

      --
      "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." ~The Honorable Daniel Patrick Moynihan
    161. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      that quicken 2005 for MAC is a TRIAL version!

      Nope. Full version.

      Mac is better in every way, but it is certianly not head and shoulders above the rest in the bundled apps

      So completely wrong in every way.

      Look at it this way: Windows is a great experience for people who want to use Microsoft Office. There are a lot of those people out there, and Windows is great for them.

      Linux is great for people who have nothing in their lives except their computer. There are a few of these people, and they've taken up Linux in droves.

      But the Mac is designed, from the inside out, for people who have lots of other stuff in their lives than their computers.

      You know who the perfect Mac customer is? It's the new parents. Late twenties, disposable income, technologically savvy, and you just had a baby. You've got the CD collection from college. You've got the digital camera. Now, for the baby, you've got the video camera. And you've got grandparents, aunts and uncles who are just begging you for pictures and video of the baby.

      The Mac is the perfect addition to that lifestyle.

      How big is that market? Twenty or thirty million people in the United States alone.

    162. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      You've stumbled onto the business plan.

      The Mac mini has specifically been designed for people who already have a desk with a keyboard, mouse and computer monitor under it. They're sick of putting up with the attendant crap that comes with using a PC, so they want to get rid of their big, ugly, noisy computer and replace it with something small, quiet and easy to use. That's the Mac mini customer.

      Anybody who doesn't already have a monitor, keyboard and mouse will do the arithmetic and find that either an eMac or an iMac G5 is the better value.

      This is not an accident. This is not the result of somebody at Apple failing to do the math. This is a very deliberate choice.

    163. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      > some of the most color accurate LCDs out there

      You need to do some more research! My salmon tinted Apple LCD disagrees with you. The color problems with the Apple displays are well-known.

    164. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      "Macs don't get viruses," but Symantec will sell you software designed to combat them anyway.

      Yup. But just take a look at the list of viruses the latest signatures will "combat". Virtually all of them are Windows viruses, old DOS viruses, and a smattering of classic MacOS viruses (a large percentage of which are Microsoft Word Macro viruses and MS Exchange infections).

      Anti-virus software for Mac OS X is primarily useful in situations where you're on a network with Windows and older Mac OS clients. Many corporations have policies that require anti-virus software on end-user machines regardless of what OS is being run (or how prone to infection it is). I'm sure Symantec sells enough copies to keep the software in development, but it's hardly required software as it is on Windows for your typical home user.

      Yaz.

    165. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Keyboard and mouse: $100

      Come on! That's got to be a "profit" opportunity for someone. We've found someone willing to pay $100 for a keyboard and mouse.

      Dunno what keyboards retail for these days, but the last mouse I bought (cheapo optical one) was $4.12.

    166. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by na2rboy · · Score: 0

      Re the comments about Dell's hardware choices, teehee if you think Dell chooses parts only based on their "cheapness." Do you really think Dell is selling millions of computers with hardware that will break at the drop of a hat and drivers that are a "mess," just so they can then field support calls from those millions of people? Dell = Big = Evil.

    167. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by amerinese · · Score: 1

      For the newbies on the minis, that's Command-Shift-A (all together now).

    168. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      To me it's the User that's at fault - not the system. Tell your users to avoid Kazaa, Bonzai Buddy, stop surfing porn sitres , and pay for the software instead of using warez and cracks.

      So yes - It's a lot of FUD.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    169. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, man, what's "Oooo" supposed to mean?
      OOo = Open Office.org. You're either a jackass, you've missed the whole OSS movement, or you haven't been on /. for very long. Possibly all 3.

      Video editing suite -- If you need to do heavy video editing you shouldn't be buying a $500 computer anyway

      Let's flash back five years, huh? "If you need to listen to compressed music files, you shouldn't be buying a $500 computer anyway." How much sense would that have made? How about going back 20 years. "If you need to us more than one font on a page, you shouldn't be buying a $500 computer anyway."


      GTFOH. Listening to compressed music files and EDITING compressed music files are 2 different things. 5 years ago, I built my own PC (P3 something or other) for less than $500 and was able to listen to compressed music, AND play the latest games; but I would have been a moron to try to do heavy music editing on it.

      It seems as though you misunderstood the meaning of HEAVY VIDEO EDITING. Here's the thing, heavy video editing requires a video editing suite. Uploading videos from your DV cam (which probably COMES with the software to do so now) and burning them to a dvd (DVD burner probably comes with software to create videos as well) does not.

      Having a video suite should only be a factor if you're doing HEAVY VIDEO EDITING. Otherwise you can use movie maker or some other little bullshit program that just gets the job done.

      Every parent in America has a mini-DV camera. Every parent in America wants to put their movies of little Junior on DVD. And every parent in America wants the ability to do so without shelling out a quarter of a million bucks on a Fire system.

      What people do with their computers has changed a bit since 1981. Might want to think about catching up with the rest of the class.


      No, every parent in america DOES NOT have a mini dv camcorder. Every parent in america may have a normal or digital camera, but that is all; and even then, every parent in america does not want to use Photoshop (an image editing suite) to edit pictures. Even if they HAD photoshop, how many of them would use anything other than the eraser, resizer, and paint brush. I'm willing to bet that not many would, which would make it pointless to include photoshop. Just give them a paint utility and they'll be happy.

      By the way, there is maybe 1 family out of 10 who actually does record all of little timmy's events with a dv cam and tries to back them up on DVDs. Everyone else is content with video tapes or just hooking the fucking camera up to the A/V inputs on the TV and going with it.

    170. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a more interesting question is:

      What tasks can you, as someone interested in the mac experience, do with a full coolness mac that you can't do with a mac mini?

    171. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by yamla · · Score: 1

      That's stupid. Many people aren't interested in Quicken 2005, for example. If you are going to force someone to buy everything in one package not found in the other, how much is it going to cost to upgrade the Mac Mini to a decent-speed CPU? Say, 3.0 Ghz? Granted, clock-for-clock, the G4 is substantially more powerful than the Pentium 4 but NOT, in my tests, compared to an Athlon XP. So, let us instead ask how much to upgrade to a reasonable bottom-end CPU running at, say, 2.0 Ghz?

      Of course, this misses the point. If you are the target audience for a Mac mini, you probably don't care about CPU speed; it'll already do all you want. But then, forcing people to add Quicken 2005 and the like to a low-end Dell is similarly missing the point.

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    172. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by yamla · · Score: 1

      The class-action lawsuits against Apple tend to indicate that Apple hardware is not actually significantly better than the bottom-end Dell stuff. Apple has certainly had more lawsuits launched against them. On the other hand, perhaps as a result, Apple has finally started producing decent hardware. I was very happy with my 2nd-gen iPod, for example.

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    173. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Pinback · · Score: 1

      How long before the fools selling on ebay realize that they can't ask 600-800$ for a low end G4 powermac, when a higher spec'ed mini is selling for 499$, includes a warranty, and possibly an update to tiger when it come out?

      Yes I know that you can put add in cards in a powermac. But do a majority of people actually install anything in the slots?

      Hauppauge really needs to write good solid Mac drivers for the WinTV-PVR-USB2, and put the case through a redesign. At this point it looks like something that came out of a cat's ass.

      If the new model ships in a brushed aluminum case, and is called the MacTV-PVR-USB2, it would go well with the Mac mini.

    174. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      You got robbed - I paid $199 for my Commodore 64 in 1983!

    175. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Milton+Waddams · · Score: 1

      When I got my laptop, I installed 10.3.0 on it. Now I've got 10.3.7 on it. So much for not being able to upgrade...

    176. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by nine-times · · Score: 1
      To me it's the User that's at fault - not the system. Tell your users to avoid Kazaa, Bonzai Buddy, stop surfing porn sitres , and pay for the software instead of using warez and cracks.

      Er... you mean, tell the users not to visit any web site. Because, you know, those joke sites that have the funny flash animations? Those sites that give oh-so-fun cursor sets and "you've got mail" sounds? Wasn't there even a case of commercial websites from semi-respectable businesses being hacked and used to install spyware?

      And the recent story about WMP running arbitrary code when searching for licenses? And all the security problems Outlook has had?

      Ok, so basically tell my users to not use their computers to visit web sites, answer e-mail, or listen to music because it's really important that we continue to use software from a company who doesn't know the meaning of the words "security scheme". How about I just tell the PHB that the best way to keep his computer secured is to leave it off and unplugged? That'll get me that raise.

      Oh, or there's another option. Stop using MS products when possible, and when you must use MS products, install 50 different products to cover all the various virus/firewall/spyware security holes.

      But we all know it's really easy, since you have no problem supporting your dad.

    177. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So you've got to add:"

      Well, the thing is, no, you don't.

      If you're a noob (in which case you're probably not reading this), you might need to add some of these things. But probably not all. If you're an old hand then you certainly don't need to run out a buy all these things. How many people will derive use of 100% of this "value added" package? Probably not many.

      A stripped down computer should be stripped down. That's what makes it cheap. The argument "Well, apples stripped down computer isn't so stripped down, so it's worth the extra price!" is kind of a fallacy. It's failing to be stripped down and cheap, like the alternative presented.

      I'm not saying it's a bad computer, a bad deal, or that no one should buy it. But if you start out with the premis that this is good b/c it is small (in form and in performance) and cheap* - but then complement it for having extra stuff and being more expensive, then you might as well just define the apple mini as the paragon of goodness and declare that everything else is inferior.

      Not like anyone would actually do that.

      * if this isn't your point then what is?

    178. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. I know an electrician who had gotten his first broadband subscription, and a new PC running XP to go along with it. After only a few days, he had me drop by. His system was damaged beyond repair by viruses and malware. I told him to take it back to the store and have them reinstall the OS. And I told him: "next time, buy a mac."

      I've heard over and over from people who buy a PC and a broadband subscription, and end up spending a ton of money "learning" that windows and broadband internet are not friends at all.

    179. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Not to mention the fact you get a TON of software with the Mini and OSX. How much software comes with the Dell? Yeah, thought so..."

      Software for the Mac? Yeah, the Mac mini comes with ALL of it. It all fits right in your desk drawer as well. =)

    180. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      ahh, so surfing to my website is going to hijack the browsewr and blow up your hard drive? Wait - I get it, CNN is really out to pound you with trojans - No wait - Heck Slashdot is there to kill off all x86 systems and will cause your power supply to suddenly leap forth and strangle you with its power cord? Ohh, and my e-mail has been relatively spam free too. My dad stopped going to the flash/joke sites, and learned to say no. Like my grandfather did, and my brother did, and damn near anyone I bother to take five minutes to explain the net do.

      It IS easy - tell them where not to go, tell them to watch what they do, and above all stay on top of updates.

      I know it's pretty difficult to do - I figure it takes a bit more than the brain power of a lemur. A smart lemur - but a lemur none the less.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    181. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OOo = Open Office.org

      Do you mean to suggest that Open Office (which I'm guess is what you're saying should be downloaded from openoffice.org) is comparable to Office? Golly. Remember that "you're comparing a first-class ticket to" analogy? We're back in that territory again.

      AppleWorks is fairly shoddy software by 21st-century standards, but at least it supports new, cutting-edge technologies like "cut" and "paste."

      You're either a jackass, you've missed the whole OSS movement, or you haven't been on /. for very long.

      If OSS means Office of Strategic Services, then just one out of three. If it means anything else, then I guess it's two out of three.

      GTFOH.

      Your guess is as good as mine here.

      It seems as though you misunderstood the meaning of HEAVY VIDEO EDITING.

      It seems as though you misunderstood the definition of iMovie. It is, in fact, capable of moderately sophisticated, multi-track, non-linear video editing in either standard or high definition. And it's bundled with the Mac mini.

      your DV cam (which probably COMES with the software to do so now)

      Software that (1) has to be installed, (2) has to be learned and (3) doesn't work with anything else on your computer. Sounds like a poor substitute for iMovie.

      burning them to a dvd (DVD burner probably comes with software to create videos as well)

      Software that (1) has to be installed, (2) has to be learned and (3) doesn't work with anything else on your computer. Sounds like a poor substitute for iDVD.

      Otherwise you can use movie maker or some other little bullshit program that just gets the job done.

      Software that (1) has to be installed, (2) has to be learned, (3) doesn't work with anything else on your computer and (4) is a "bullshit program." Sounds like a poor substitute for iMovie and iDVD.

      No, every parent in america DOES NOT have a mini dv camcorder.

      Literally? No. It's a figure of speech. Mini-DV cameras are ubiquitous.

      every parent in america does not want to use Photoshop (an image editing suite) to edit pictures

      Which is why Apple bundles iPhoto. We keep coming back to the main point here, don't we? Which is that the software bundled with the Mac mini makes your life easier instead of harder, and that no comparable software is available for the PC at any price.

      By the way, there is maybe 1 family out of 10 who actually does record all of little timmy's events with a dv cam and tries to back them up on DVDs.

      Let's say it were one family out of ten. That would still be 10 million families in the United States alone. Nice market.

      Of course, it's not one out of ten. It's much, much higher.

      Everyone else is content with video tapes or just hooking the fucking camera up to the A/V inputs on the TV and going with it.

      Oh, I see. Because that's the way we did it in 1989, that's how we should do it today. Got it. Great plan you've got there.

      In case you're wondering, this is why Apple's profits for the quarter ending 12/25 quadrupled over the previous year's. This is why they're growing like a house on fire: because they don't say, "You should be satisfied with doing it the old, clumsy, hard way."

      Your philosophy is, "It should be hard," so you're okay with things that are hard. Apple's philosophy is, "It should easy." So they make it easy.

    182. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please post a link to where I can buy the hardware for $97.15

    183. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean you don't have a corporate proxy in place to block out shit sites?

    184. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It IS easy - tell them where not to go, tell them to watch what they do, and above all stay on top of updates.

      Maybe you're a troll, or maybe you just aren't quite catching the sarcasm here, but let me say it flat out. Supporting your brother, father, and grandfather is not the same as working a helpdesk professionally. I understand you think it is. I did too, when I was 17 and had never worked professionally as a tech.

      The first mistake you're making is that you cannot rely on your users to have the common sense or the will-power of a lemur. You don't want your users to do something, you pretty much have to make it impossible, and even then, some exec who could fire you on a whim may very likely disapprove of the fact that his favorite joke sites are blocked.

      Does user education help? Sure. Will it actually stop spyware infestation? No. Does any of this excuse MS from making the monumentally bone-headed decision of giving their web-browser the ability to install random apps without asking? No.

    185. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then he should have provided the link to the cheapest price, don't you think? Btw fucktard, I use a powerbook all the time, so calling me a PC fanboy is wildly off mark. Not all Mac owners think everything Apple does is great. Your ignorance is forgiven. Hopefully this revelation will help you suck less at life.

    186. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err.. The price in the UK is actually £289 + VAT (sales tax) which is a fairer comparison to the US price.

      The difference is only £23 or $43.

    187. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that I need now is PearPC and Mac OSX and I'm all set!

    188. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by zod1025 · · Score: 1

      I second this post. The Mac Mini is a spectacular product, perfectly placed to compete as either a desktop replacement, a desktop accessory, or a media center device. The question isn't IF I'll be ordering it, but when (tax return!)

      Speaking of having it next to the game consoles... what if Apple used this as a stepping stone into the gaming world? The hardware of Apple being more fixed like consoles, the reputation for quality, a prominent position in the living room... it could happen!

      --

      -ZOD-
    189. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by UWC · · Score: 1

      You both got hosed. I paid $2 for one a couple months ago, and it came with a cassette tape reader!

    190. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No CD burner either. Why do you guys always miss that one?

    191. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by UWC · · Score: 1
      Several people are pointing out the inclusion of 2-port hub functionality on Mac keyboards, which I do admit is quite handy, and probably the way I'll go when/if I get a Mac mini. The only thing I might note is that the extra ports on those keyboards are (I assume) not powered like the ones on the back of the case or on a powered hub. While that's fine for mice, most cameras, and PDAs that are charged via an electrical outlet, there are devices that derive substantial power from the USB port that won't work correctly on a nonpowered hub.

      Something I've not considered until just now: can I attach a powered hub to a port on a nonpowered hub and have powered devices work correctly?

    192. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by generic-man · · Score: 1

      If you think that's bad, check out BitDefender and eTrust Antivirus for Palm OS. There are some Palm OS models that can go online wirelessly, but the chance of a "virus" hitting them is very slim. Yay for corporate paranoia.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    193. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Yosho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let's compare the two.

      First, let's update the Mac Mini; upgrading to 512 MB RAM and a 80 GB hard drive at the Apple store bumps the cost up to $625.

      Now let's update the Dell. Include Windows XP Pro (because the Mac does not ship with a crippled version of OS X), a CD-RW/DVD-ROM combo drive (the Dell only has a CD-ROM), the cheap 56k modem, and we're up to $707.

      I can't seem to find any information about the Dell's video card, and there's no option to upgrade it, so it's probably a cheap integrated chipset. It's also pretty unlikely to have a DVI output or Firewire, but I can't find that information anywhere, either. On the other hand, the Dell's processor is probably slightly faster even when you take into account the MHz myth, so we'll call them even.

      So, the Dell is $82 more expensive with roughly the same specs. Supposedly there's a $100 mail-in rebate, but I have heard horror stories about how hard it is to get companies to honor those, so take it with a grain of salt. The Dell also doesn't have equivalents to the iLife suite or Quicken 2005, and it's probably about ten times as large. I fail to see how that's a better deal.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    194. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was working on one of our lab machines... had an exposed serial connector hanging out. I was wearing a sweater (I know, I know... I should have been wearing a ground strap too.)

      Zapped the serial connector with a static shock, swore like a motherfucker... and only then noticed that the machine had rebooted when it got zapped. Not a normal reboot. A "fuck you for zapping me, I'm going to cycle power and drop your unsaved work you punk motherfucker" reboot.

      Took me a few minutes to stop laughing.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    195. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Val314 · · Score: 1

      >bottom-end CPU running at, say, 2.0 Ghz?

      bottom end? an Athlon 64 3000+ runs at 2.0Ghz and i wouldnt consider that a low end chip

      i've just bought a 1.67 GHz Sempron (rated at 2400+) and its more than enough for the office tasks.

    196. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by l1gunman · · Score: 1

      I picked up an off-the shelf USB 1.1 hub from D-Link that I used for years. I just also snagged a cheap USB 2.0 hub from Sam's Club that also works with my PowerBook's USB 2.0 ports. For the most part, hubs are hubs.

    197. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      No one pointed a gun to their head to make them buy the system and then not learn to use it.

      And if you're doing help desk work - well, you asked for it. You're dealing with the clueless dips. I quit a good paying job as a boxman in a casino because I was dealing with the dregs of humanity. I knew I couldn't rely on the customers to learn my job, or behave properly, or even have an ounce of courtesy - One day I almost lunged over a craps table to beat the crap out a loser that blew cigar smoke dead in my face.

      Does that mean all people are fucking assholes that deserve to be beaten? Nope. But I took a pay cut and started working a diferent job in a different field. I started as a data miner and am now happily programming with other folks that understand systems.

      Does education stop spyware infestations? Absofuckinglutely. Should Microsoft be held accountable for the predatory practices of others or the stupidity of their users? Nope.

      No one is holding a gun to the head of the pron surfer, noone is holding a gun to the head of a warez kiddie. Noone is holding a gun to the head of a grandmother that clicks the new free software for weather - and infecting her system either.

      Should Microsoft be held accountable for issues like slammer? If and Only when they don't release a patch before it hits. So far - that hasn't happened.

      So again.. FUD

      As an aside - I'd really look to get a job where you have a bit more control or a bit more of a future - Help desk shit gets you stressed almost as bad as food service or casino jobs do.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    198. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      Any real graphic designer knows good 'ol CRTs are still the way to go. ;)

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    199. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "On the mac when anything wants root, it prompts for a password, which most users will cheerfully and promptly give."

      Yeah. That's actually a feature that makes it *LESS* likely that they'll be running *EVERYTHING* as root.

      Of course, I haven't heard of any games that you need to be root to play on a Mac.

    200. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by nolife · · Score: 1

      Again, I am just bringing up the point of comparision. Much of what you said is worth noting but there is FUD in there also.

      (because the Mac does not ship with a crippled version of OS X)

      That is FUD plan and simple and honestly shows your true intention of not providing a balanced comparision. XP home can not participate in a Windows domain. That is not going to effect a home user at all so your claim of requiring XP Professional is completely bogus. In all fairness, the OSX machine will not natively participate in a Windows domain at the same level as XP professional either.

      DVD Drive. That is an expensive upgrade from Dell at$79. You could buy your own DVD+-RW anywhere for about $60 (Yes, you can buy upgrade parts from anywhere).

      I can't seem to find any information about the Dell's video card,
      Dell's video card in a cheap integrated model and the 3000 motherboard offers no AGP slot, huge downside. The integrated Intel is not as good as a ATI 9200 but.. Neither is outstanding regardless. Better relative to each other really has no impact on the end user as they are both relatively slow. Just as my GF2 is far better then a Trident Blade chipset, neither is useful for anything recent if gaming is your purpose. Beyond the scope of comparision but you can buy a ATI 9200 PCI card for roughly $50 at newegg. Considering neither of these machines is a powerhouse overall, anyone wanting power would be equally frustrated at the performance of either.
      Firewire and DVI is also an advantage with the Mac, but only an advantage to those that desire this functionality. Firewire not being as popular in the IBM PC world, users do not assume it will be there and not frustrated that it is not. External connection of a DV camera being main reason for use. I happen to use firewire on my PC and I had to buy a seperate card.
      Your rebates comment is FUD also. I personally know of at least 10 people that have bought Dell computers in the past year with a rebate and not a single one has had a problem getting the money back. I'm sure it does happen but not to the level you describe.

      Size? HUGE difference. Always an Apple initiative. You can not put a price on what size means to an individual. I can honestly not figure out when and when I would ever not have room for a PC. I am comfortable with a standard PC so that means very little to me. Could be a deal maker or breaker breaker for many.

      I can see where each machine could have an advantage. You seem to be willing to twist everything possible to only see things your way which kind of makes my reply to your comment a waste of time.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    201. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah plus theres the additional iCuteness fee

    202. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some people are concerned with more than just cuteness

    203. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by steve's+nose+is+blee · · Score: 1

      You know who the perfect Mac customer is? It's the new parents. Late twenties, disposable income, technologically savvy, and you just had a baby. You've got the CD collection from college. You've got the digital camera. Now, for the baby, you've got the video camera. And you've got grandparents, aunts and uncles who are just begging you for pictures and video of the baby.

      The Mac is the perfect addition to that lifestyle.


      Wow....they got you early! It's too early for propaganda where I'm at. You sound exactly like a PR release for Apple. Let's try rearranging some of your options.

      Windows is for the masses, they have no choice, they have no idea what an operating system really is. Some acutally are aware of the choices and LIKE Windows.
      Linux is for the tinkerers, the thinkers, the hobbyists, the people who want to actually do things with their computers. This is the market Apple used to sell to.

      Apple is marketed as a glorified media editing suite in a neat box for people with a lot of money....
      Golf clap for Apple...

    204. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by ppp · · Score: 1

      There are kit cars too. Most people would rather buy a Toyota.

      Geez, talk about hyperbole! Putting your own computer together is hardly comparable to building a car. I should know, I've built a few computers and that was less work than just putting in a new stereo system in my Toyota. There are a whole lot of people who enjoy building and tinkering with PCs, modding their cases and whatnot, and they are more than a fringe market.

      -G
      www.g-pix.com

    205. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by damsa · · Score: 1
    206. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 1

      try this in the terminal window instead:

      sudo periodic weekly
      sudo periodic monthly

      they do wonders for a wayward mac :)

      --
      There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
    207. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the usb ports on the keyboard aren't powered... but if you plug the mouse into the keyboard you still have one other powered USB port on the computer.

    208. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by ppp · · Score: 1

      some people are concerned with more than just cuteness

      For some people, style is more than just "cuteness", and can contribute to a positive user experience, just like a pleasant work environment can. Apple runs circles around just about everyone else in the tech industry when it comes to style and design, and many are willing to pay extra for it. And whether you actually DO pay extra in the long run is also a matter of debate.

      -G
      www.g.pix.com

    209. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      The Mac doesn't even have a bundled solitaire game

      Pff. Solitaire. How declassé. Mac OS X, my dear, includes a little game called Chess. I should think that you might have heard of chess, even in the barbaric Windows lands.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    210. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      actually I think it was only $495. That is what they cost new when they first came out. It was cheap commpared to the Atari 800 at like 1099 or the Apple II
      I had the first Commodre 64 in my town.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    211. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by tricorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It "keeping its value" means you can re-sell it, making your replacement less expensive. With a PC, you have to pay someone to recycle it.

    212. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I heard of Chess back in my OS/2 days, when IBM bundled both Chess and Solitaire (which it called "Klondike") with the operating system.

      Now that was innovation.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    213. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by nine-times · · Score: 1
      And if you're doing help desk work - well, you asked for it. You're dealing with the clueless dips.

      Sure, I asked for it, but what about that excuses MS? If I were a mechanic and noticed that Honda Civics engines died if people were a few days late changing the oil, then sure, you could say, "Well, what are you complaining for? It's your job to fix cars!" You could also advise me to tell my customers who owned Civics to make sure they change their oil on time. None of this, however, would let Honda off the hook for making a sub-standard product. If I knew Civics showed this behavior, I would advise people to purchase another model of car. Likewise, I generally advise people to use something other than Windows.

      Does education stop spyware infestations? Absofuckinglutely.

      You're naive. Education paired with locking users down to a secure profile and a proper array of anti-spyware software (and switching to Firefox) has been doing a pretty good job at my company, but education alone? No.

      Noone is holding a gun to the head of a grandmother that clicks the new free software for weather - and infecting her system either.

      Not disagreeing... However, if you have a grandmother who is liable to want the new free weather software no matter what you tell her, isn't it then better to put her on a system where the free weather software, or just visiting the free weather software's web site, isn't likely to cause her harm? I mean, if that's the grandmother you're dealing with, why are you insisting that, no, she *must* be given this insecure system, and any argument to the contrary is FUD?

      As an aside - I'd really look to get a job where you have a bit more control or a bit more of a future

      I wasn't complaining about my job. I was saying that you don't seem to have any idea what it takes to do my job. Part of my job is to make purchasing recommendations based on what technology is going to best help the business run smoothly. Given the current state of things, I advise against Windows (where feasible). It's not FUD, it's experience.

    214. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      But not a comparable Dell, which makes less noise has less power consumption and the same form factor and connectivity. I dont know why many criers dont see the benefits of this machine, if you go for silent low power computing on the pc side of things, you end up spending significantly more.

    215. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Well, good *new* CRTs are the way to go for color matching. Bad old CRTs tend to be what I see around. Good new LCDs do a pretty good job, plus take up less desk space, are easier to move around, take less power, are easier on the eyes for long working hours, look cool, etc.

    216. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has finally started producing decent hardware. I was very happy with my 2nd-gen iPod, for example.

      Apple has been making decent hardware for a long time. You only noticed when they became 'cool'.

    217. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      And looks more powerful than my G4 Mirror Door 1G. Oh, wait a minute, there is no mirror on the box, how can I raze my beard every morning? Use the CDR? Maybe.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    218. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      Store more than 40 gigs of data, for one.

    219. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      This is insanely overpriced, a poor example. If you notice, they are charging over $350 for the case alone. Building one of these with parts from MiniITX.com would cost half as much. $100 for case and PS, $120 for the MB, Processor, graphics, ethernet and sound, then standard pries for everything else off of froogle.

    220. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      Sure, I asked for it, but what about that excuses MS? If I were a mechanic and noticed that Honda Civics engines died if people were a few days late changing the oil, then sure, you could say, "Well, what are you complaining for? It's your job to fix cars!" You could also advise me to tell my customers who owned Civics to make sure they change their oil on time. None of this, however, would let Honda off the hook for making a sub-standard product. If I knew Civics showed this behavior, I would advise people to purchase another model of car. Likewise, I generally advise people to use something other than Windows.
      Software isn't cars - so flatly the comparison failes. However - if we must use the comparison it's more like "Hi, I have this civic, and I just got a free hydraulic snowplow from this guy down the street, and we bolted it in (or I did, I don't remember) Now my cars front end is sitting on the tires and it won't move - so I want you to fix your defective civic." "Whattya mean it's not a design fault? There were places to bolt it into the frame!"


      You're naive. Education paired with locking users down to a secure profile and a proper array of anti-spyware software (and switching to Firefox) has been doing a pretty good job at my company, but education alone? No.

      How am I naive? Sounds like your "educated users" are stupid. Again - FUD

      Not disagreeing... However, if you have a grandmother who is liable to want the new free weather software no matter what you tell her, isn't it then better to put her on a system where the free weather software, or just visiting the free weather software's web site, isn't likely to cause her harm? I mean, if that's the grandmother you're dealing with, why are you insisting that, no, she *must* be given this insecure system, and any argument to the contrary is FUD?
      Yes. Because she hasn't been given an "Unsecure system" - It is secure - It works well. If she could learn how to properly use it then you wouldn't have this discussion then. Going back to the car example - I'm shure she had lessons and learned the rules of the road - Like not driving on sidewalks. So yes, we're back to fud.



      I wasn't complaining about my job. I was saying that you don't seem to have any idea what it takes to do my job.

      Maybe not your job, But a similiar one where it's done correctly
      Part of my job is to make purchasing recommendations based on what technology is going to best help the business run smoothly. Given the current state of things, I advise against Windows (where feasible). It's not FUD, it's experience.
      or lack there of... But again, if you can't educate the users - kill their net connection till they get a clue.

      Hyping this on Microsoft is where I'm digging my heels in here - The problem lies with the users and the people who want clueless users to fall in their clutches. And when another browser or OS reaches the same market share you'll be seeing the same products written for them as well.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    221. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by nine-times · · Score: 1
      Software isn't cars - so flatly the comparison failes. However - if we must use the comparison it's more like "Hi, I have this civic, and I just got a free hydraulic snowplow from this guy down the street, and we bolted it in (or I did, I don't remember) Now my cars front end is sitting on the tires and it won't move - so I want you to fix your defective civic." "Whattya mean it's not a design fault? There were places to bolt it into the frame!"

      Problem with your comparison: The computers come with Windows preinstalled, and Windows, with default settings, is insecure. It's not enough to "not do stupid things", you need to know quite a bit to make Windows even semi-secure in the first place. You had better use a firewall (even in XP SP2, the included one isn't sufficient) an anti-virus, install Firefox, and anti-spyware software. If you don't do this, using your computer in reasonable ways can still get you into trouble.

      So, back to your example, it'd be a little more like if your car came with its shocks set up so, unless you modified the car pretty heavily before driving, the front end would be sitting on the tires after you hit your first rock. Now, you could put in the manual, "You may only drive this car on perfectly smooth surfaces. Steer around pebbles." Or, you could buy a car that doesn't have that problem.

      How am I naive? Sounds like your "educated users" are stupid.

      That's my point. If you think education stops people from being stupid, you're naive.

    222. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, can you REALLY run Half Life 2 EFFECTIVELY on a *$500* Wintel Box?

      Thought not!

    223. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 1

      Call me crazy but that was an Elantra not an Excel.

      Oh I see, you were trying to prove the above poster's point.

      --
      "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
    224. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> This is about getting away from the 'Windows" world and it's viruses, and its spyware, and it's glitches.

      No glitches, eh? Go watch Steve's keynote demo. The machine locked up.

    225. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      Problem with your comparison: The computers come with Windows preinstalled, and Windows, with default settings, is insecure. It's not enough to "not do stupid things", you need to know quite a bit to make Windows even semi-secure in the first place. You had better use a firewall (even in XP SP2, the included one isn't sufficient) an anti-virus, install Firefox, and anti-spyware software. If you don't do this, using your computer in reasonable ways can still get you into trouble.
      And the frame comes pre installed in a honda civic too. And I'm guessing if you put a five year old in the driver seat of that civic, without installing the requisite knowledge to start, operate, maintain the civic - You're gonna end up with a fatal accident someday. Contrary to popular belief, Honda Civics are only safe if you know how to correctly use and maintain them - Otherwise they can hijack your life. A very poor design if you ask me...

      That's my point. If you think education stops people from being stupid, you're naive.

      And if you're thinking switching to Firefox will fix the problem you're a little beyond naive. I'm hoping whereever you work - Someone has set the windows machines in the network to autoupdate without the user intervention. Cause securing a system by switching to firefox is laughable at best.

      And yes, I'm using firefox right now because I like the features it includes - However - I don't feel secure using it because - well, Time will show.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    226. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by mt+v2.7 · · Score: 1

      You leave out that Dells come with a keyboard, mouse, -speakers-, and frequently a decent printer..

    227. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      100 for a good mini itx case, you have to go for the cheapest C3 to be fanless then you are already around 200, add 50 for a CD rom, another 25-50 for ram, then you are already on 300, add to that a suitable power supply, a notebook harddisk (which is around 100) you are already on 400. Well you are a tad cheaper than apple, but this configuration is slow as molasses. To get the same speed, you have to bypass Efficeon itx boards, which start at around 300+ (with this price you already are above Apple if you add the components) and go for Centrino with a shared mem. Then you are from the board and processor alone above the Apple offer and then you have a processor which is faster than the apple offering at the same clockspeed, but a graphics chip which is way slower. The board processor combo in miniATX formfactor should be obtainable at around 500+ if you can get it even at that price (we are speaking of small volumes here)

      Face it the Apple offering is the best bang for the buck you can get currently in the small/silent PC arena. With an Efficeon or Centrino Board, depending on your needs (should it be cheaper or faster) the second option, but both options are already more expensive if xou add all the parts even if you build the system for yourself.

      Dont even start to talk about run of the mill prebuilt silent systems with small formfactor decent ones on the PC side of things without any software basically around 700 and more, same goes for ARM based offerings (PDAs aside which miss connectivity)

    228. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by damsa · · Score: 1

      People do some strange things. For the price of that modified Hyundai you can probably buy a Ferrari. To put this more on topic. Sure you can play Doom 3 with a 9200, but by the time you add the CPU, hard drive, sound card ETC. Why not spend the extra 50 bucks for a better video card.

    229. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by paco3791 · · Score: 1

      Actually yes. As a matter of fact every person I know who has gotten a dell (all laptops though) has had some kind of problem neccisitating a call to tech support. In fact when my girl friend talked to the tech monkey at dell he owned up that "people don't by dells for great hardware, they by dells for the great service". Yeah... riiight.

    230. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Apple has been making decent hardware for a long time. You only noticed when they became 'cool'.

      Apple quality has been all over the place for a long time (e4 power macs ring a bell?) and their OS was just bad. The reason Apple became cool was that they finally pulled their head out - standardized quality of hardware and replace the dangerously obsolete Mac OS.

    231. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      INSANELY OVERPRICED?!?!?!?!

      Just EXACTLY what world are you people living in?!?

      Has anyone mentioned that, not only is the Mac mini (notice the correct capitalization) the most affordable Mac ever, but that it is priced LESS than the Apple 1?

      Sheesh! What a sad, sad bunch of whiners.

    232. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anarchitect_in_oz · · Score: 1

      Yep it's not a bad thing at all.
      After all i buy a mac that "keeps it's value" and our government writes the tax law based on the commodity boxes.
      So i write the whole value off and still sell the computer and get lots of productive work done on my trouble free mac.

      Bring on cheap disposable computers.
      They only make the situation better for mac owners.

      --
      "Call us when the New age is old enough to drink" Beck
    233. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 1

      I have also put my money where my mouth is. Ordered a mini and have been a MS-DOS/windows guy since 1988. I work as a Network Administrator and I do not like working for Bill for free, i.e. fixing friends and relatives PC's because they are just users.

      --
      Your Average Joe
    234. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the APPLICATION became non-responsive. The MACHINE (and its OS) did NOT.

      And, BTW, you also failed to mention that Stevie turned that into a dig on Uncle Billy-bob's BSOD and "lock up" at CES by quickly clicking a KVM switch and quipping "Guess we have a bug. That's why WE have Backup Systems!"

      Betcha Gates NEVER goes on stage again without a backup from here on out...

    235. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Oh-es-eX · · Score: 0

      Indeed the price is worth the software alone.

    236. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of implications here.

      A computer that 'keeps its value' is a lot like a car that doesn't lose 25% of it's value when you drive it off the lot.

      The implication is that the product is somehow inherently better.

      If you take a Toyota for $20k off the lot and sold it to your neighbor, you'd be able to get $18k out of it. Take a $20k Ford Focus and you'd be lucky to get $12k out of it.

      So the thing about commodity PC market is not that prices keep going down: Performance keeps going up! So if you spend $2k on a computer today, and $2k on a computer next year, you get a computer roughly 110% better. Or upgrade the ram for $200. Then upgrade the video card for $300. Then buy a new hard drive for $300. Then replace the power supply for $80. Then get a new CPU for $150.

      On a Mac what you do is: Spend $2k now. Wait 5 years. sell it for $500, and buy another Mac for $2k. Total outlay is roughly the same, but the difference is that you spend less effort on your computer.

      That, and your Mac stays just as useful 5 years later without upgrades as your PC.

      The PC is only really a benefit for those that enjoy that kind of thing.

      Now with the Mac mini a person can invest $500 into their Mac and then replace it five years later when they decide they need something better, instead of spending $2k

    237. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Juice2504 · · Score: 1

      I work in MSFT development and support; at home I use both Linux and Windows. I'm not a big fan of Apple, never disliked them either though, looked at the Mac a few times, but couldn't justify the cost for something I wouldn't use that seriously.

      This has changed however. I just don't think some of you get what this is about. My office at home is 6'x 8'. This doesn't leave me with much space for loads of kit, this mini Mac though is just the ticket. I get a machine that runs Apache, mySQL, mail server, etc. In a box with a smaller footprint than my mouse mat, that doesn't keep the family awake all night. I already have a keyboard, mouse and 22" CRT, I don't need another display. All I need is a small, almost silent "PC" and this is it.

      There is another bonus; I can let my wife use it for mail and surfing without the worry of what she may have "installed" whilst I've been at work.

      I will be ordering one in the next few days.

      Just my 2p worth.

    238. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      Don't forget 10 years in prison.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    239. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please put down your Apple branded crack, and step down from that Apple branded podium for a moment here.

    240. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1
      That's without a DVD-ROM or any Software except XP Home (the Mac comes with the full version of OSX not a cut down version).

      So you've got to add XP-Pro (at least), DVD-ROM, Quicken 2005, Office and a Video editing suite

      *then* start comparing prices.

      To quote Colonel Potter, "HORSE HOCKEY". Stop wasting everybody's time justifying a price with features some of us don't care about.

      I'm a Mac fan. Let me go on the record as saying that. If I want to compare prices between an entry Mac and a Shuttle, but I don't need an expensive OS, a DVD-ROM, Quicken, a paid for Office suite or any video editing suite, I can just walk down to Fry's Electronics, find a Shuttle I like and look up the price of a system that meets my needs. I don't need to add software just to compare, I'm a consumer! I can compare entry Mac against entry PC any way I want! If the Mac comes with stuff I don't need, it's wasted resource and there's no value. In economic circles, I'm paying the opportunity cost, but not getting the benefit -- a loss in economic efficiency.

      Compare what you want with a Minimac. I'll compare the OS that I prefer (MacOS X) against my favorite PC OS (Debian unstable) on some low end hardware and you can bet I won't add in the software for the Shuttle that I don't care about. MacOSX plus my percieved quality of a Mac are alone worth doubling the cost to get up to $499 + the cost of enough memory to actually do something.

      You're talking like the idiots who say the only way to compare the cost of a new Mac with a customizable video card (read as PowerMac G5) is to compare with a dual Xeon with XP Pro and all the wizbang whistles added on, when all I want is a nice single processor Athlon with a top of the line nVidia processor and a gig of RAM. If you're not using those features (I don't need wireless, I have CAT5e just fine and don't get me started on charging everybody for optical sound when so few of us care), leave them out! Don't be an idiot and start adding useless features to justify a purchase!

      Add up the price of the features YOU WANT for each platform. Acknowledge any value increase the software or hardware of either platform in your features and prices, then make an educated decision. For me, a new Mac with OSX is worth far more than the $129 upgrade price Apple charges, and that goes into it. Style is worth something, too, but recent PCs have come part way. There aren't many PCs that are as beautiful and functionally aesthetic as the PowerMac G5, and that may be worth something too.

      I'll probably be picking up a Minimac in a year with the VGA to S-Video adapter ($19) to be my home entertainment system. I don't care about Quicken, Office or video editing (for chrissake, who the hell has time for that crap?), I just want VLC and a Mac on my TV. Around that time, my 1GHz PowerBook G4 may also be due for an upgrade, and I'll take advantage of eBay and the value retention of the Mac -- another value add of the platform for me.

    241. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by mister_tim · · Score: 1

      But, most importantly, what tasks can you, as a user, do with a $500 PC that you can't with the $500 Mac?

      Play games, maybe?
      Ok, I know there are games for the Mac, so I'll clarify and say, games such as Half-Life, Half-Life 2, Doom 3, and 90% of games that get released for Windows. (Disclaimer: I'm a Mac fan, but keep a Windows desktop for gaming)

    242. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by starrsoft · · Score: 2, Interesting
      How much software comes with the Dell?

      Hey now! Don't act as if Dells don't come with lots of software. They do come with lot's of software!

      1. AOL
      2. MSN Internet
      3. Branded version of Internet Explorer
      4. Branded version of MusicMatch Jukebox
      5. Non-updateable version of McAfee VirusScan (yay says home user! now I'm protected! don't have to do anything else!)
      6. Crippled version of PaintShop
      7. Lots of nice icons with Special Offers!
      8. A program that tells me about important computer stuff (Dell Support Alerts)
      9. Lots more I forgot to list

      Yeah, thought so...
      Humph! Well you thought wrong! Dell comes with lots of software! And think of it! All this stuff comes with a handy order form for the full version! How conveinient! How dare you say that Mac has a bunch of software and a Dell doesn't???!??!

      On a serious note: It take me at least an hour to uninstall all the crap that comes with each new Dell system I have to configure.

      --
      Read my blog: HansMast.com
    243. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by tricorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Isn't it amazing? People have been complaining forever that Apple only has a 1-button mouse, why can't they sell a Mac with the option of not buying their mouse so you can use your own 2- or 3-button mouse. Apple does so, and now those same people complain that Apple isn't selling them a mouse!

      One big point of this machine is that many, many people have a perfectly good USB keyboard and/or mouse sitting around, along with a display. Apple is finally giving people the choice of not buying any of those. When you buy one of those RealCheap Dell machines, do you get the option of not getting a keyboard and mouse? I didn't think so. You get a $45 credit for not getting a display (from Dell, anyway)...but you do get WordPerfect included!

      So the memory upgrade option is slightly more expensive - to go cheaper, you have to find a way to sell the one that comes with it, and even then you're only saving a little bit.

      Also, note that Apple has free shipping on it (at least, right now)!

      After looking around at Dell and Gateway, this thing is a good deal. Not stunningly great, but good enough that people who can afford an iMac G5 or a PowerMac G5 are still going to have good reasons to get one of those instead. But good enough that they might even get one in addition. Can you build-your-own for less? Of course you can. Can most people build-their-own for any amount? Do most people want to buy a no-name box built by Joe Random at the local computer shop? No, and no.

      If you really want to go cheap, Sam's Club has a $157 box with no hard drive, no monitor and it comes with a Linux install CD. Still has a keyboard and mouse, though.

    244. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Megane · · Score: 1
      That would be the old "beige" G3, which is a full two years older.

      ...and it doesn't run 10.3 either. As much as I love my pair of Blue & White 350s, I wouldn't take a beige G3 unless it was free, and even then I'd have to think about it.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    245. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by toddestan · · Score: 1

      On the otherhand, I can buy used PCs for next to nothing, which is a huge advantage. Just before Christmas, I bought a used HP Vectra box with a 1.5Ghz P4, 1GB of ram, DVD and CD-RW, and a GeForce2 for just over $200. That's a nice computer for cheap, and it can run just about anything, including newer games (though, I admit, not that well). Spend $200 on a used Mac and you'd be lucky to get something that can even run OSX.

    246. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That's some expensive bandwidth!

      I'd say $.20 for the CD (I buy name brand blanks), and another $.20 in electricity to leave the computer on overnight instead of shutting it down. Sending and recieving the packets is free.

    247. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by tricorn · · Score: 1

      If you're going to troll, at least get the figures right.

      Upgrade to 80GB HD and 512MB RAM: $125
      Keyboard and mouse: $58
      Bluetooth + upgrade to wireless keyboard and mouse: $91 (i.e. $149 TOTAL for Bluetooth, wireless keyboard, wireless mouse).

      You can get a monitor anywhere. As big or as small as you want. DVI or analog. You can even use your TV, with a $19 adapter (resolution sucks, of course, but you can play DVDs on it).

    248. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by tricorn · · Score: 1

      Must be why Microsoft's "Office Test Drive" for Mac OSX requires that you have admin privileges to run it... and then, it will only run for the first login ID to run it! They must have figured that with all those programs making Windows look bad, they should do the same to the Mac.

    249. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by tricorn · · Score: 1

      As long as you're going to upgrade the hard drive, you might as well go with the faster processor for $50 more. $675 for the faster Mac Mini with 512MB RAM and 80GB hard drive. Don't forget that Apple has free shipping...

    250. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But more importantly, what can you do with this base $500 mac that you couldn't do with a $320 PC dual booting Windows XP Home with linux?

      http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.gsp?produ ct _id=3321522

    251. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Mad+Ogre · · Score: 1

      Play Doom 3.

      --
      MadOgre.com
    252. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by clontzman · · Score: 1

      I understand what you're saying, but you're kinda missing my point. The reason PC prices go down is because the price of brand new PCs continue to drop. As a consumer, that's not a bad thing.

      Look at it another way -- what's the value of a low-end Mac now that the Mac mini is out? You think there's a market for 400MHz G4s anymore? The used Mac market is about to experience the same depreciation as the PC market and that's a good thing for everybody.

    253. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by clontzman · · Score: 1

      So the thing about commodity PC market is not that prices keep going down: Performance keeps going up! So if you spend $2k on a computer today, and $2k on a computer next year, you get a computer roughly 110% better. Or upgrade the ram for $200. Then upgrade the video card for $300. Then buy a new hard drive for $300. Then replace the power supply for $80. Then get a new CPU for $150.


      Actually, we're both right -- performance is going up while prices are going down on commodity PCs. Now it's happening on the Mac platform too. The market for old, used Macs is about to go kerblooey because no one's going to want to buy an old 500MHz G4 off of eBay because of the Mac mini. It's the exact same situation and doesn't have anything to do with some magical ability of the Mac to retain its value.

    254. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by jseale · · Score: 1
      "Yes, the Mac is more expensive in terms of raw computing power. But, a lot of people consider Mac OS X to be worth a significant premium over Windows XP."

      Especially when you consider that OS X is Unix-based and is the next best thing to Linux IMHO.

    255. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by PPGMD · · Score: 1
      Didn't say I agreed with it, but Microsoft is correct on their assumption. The OEMs can choose to install it if they want, along with their usual bevy of crap.

      Also just because it's there doesn't mean that even half-way technically adept people will use it. I have a new customer that runs a multi-million dollar pool business from his home computer (running XP Pro), he knew his way around computers, but believe it or not, he had not one back up, even though he has had a history of crashes.

      December 24th, I received a call, his computer has crashed. I come there and check it out, sure enough his entire hard drive had crapped out, there was nothing I could do about it, it appeared the FAT table was gone for the main partition. The secondary partition was showed files, but the data was unreadable.

      Luckily for my client a drive recovery server was able to get his data back (at the cost of nearly $5k). He still hasn't learned his lesson though, instead of buying a RAID 1 array, and sending backups to off site back up (as I suggested, and the cheapest option too), he buys a Viao notebook and decides that he will do the backup to it.

      I predict that I will be getting a call from him in the next year, when his notebook hard drive craps out.

    256. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Dr.+Sigmund+Freud · · Score: 1
      This $500 Apple is still insanely overpriced.
      GotApex? has a "headless Dell" on their site for $449.
      The mini Mac is not for people who know the price of every thing but the value of nothing. If you think that getting a 32 db whisper-quite box with OSX and its bundled suite of iLife and Xcode is less attractive than getting a noisy XP box with its suite of trojans, viri, and spyware, then obviously this machine is not meant for you.
      Here are the specs:
      2.8Ghz P4 w/800Mhz bus
      256MB DDR2 SDRAM
      40GB S-ATA
      2 year on site warranty
      Its not the meat, but the motion, if you get what I mean, bubba.
      Of course, if I don't get modded to hell, there will be a dozen replys from the Apple "amen corner" telling me that the Apple is a better deal, etc.
      You seem to be more worried about mod points than actually making a point. But don't worry, I won't tell you the mini Mac is a better deal. For you, a $199 clunker from MalWart would be the better deal. The mini Mac is only a better value.

    257. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it amazing? People have been complaining forever that Apple only has a 1-button mouse, why can't they sell a Mac with the option of not buying their mouse so you can use your own 2- or 3-button mouse. Apple does so, and now those same people complain that Apple isn't selling them a mouse!

      The only thing I was saying is that you need a keyboard for a computer. I think it's great that it's an option. But you still need a keyboard and that costs money.

    258. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by NicM · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're right. It is slightly more sane if I'd looked at the ex-VAT price :-).

      It almost numbers them among the few companies who aren't persistently trying to shaft everyone in .uk on price while pretending it is justified.

      Guess I judged it a little too fast ;-). There are just far too many cases where someone has obviously gone "hmm, 1 ukp == 1.9 usd, let's price them at X in both countries and pretend it's just natural extra costs!".

    259. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by midknight32 · · Score: 1

      Obviously I was unclear :P

      Dells come loaded with a bunch of "helper" applications that, frankly, get in the way. For most people's needs (And I speak from personal experience teaching people how to burn CD's at home) It is far easier to use the built-in XP tools for copying data files to a CD than the what dell provides. For other stuff, nero seems to be easier for Novices to pick up than the dell-provided roxio (again i speak from personal experiece). The photo apps and such "work" (and IMO not as well as iPhoto), but the music apps just aren't as good as iTunes (IMO) and the various diagnostic, troubleshooting, and "dell help" apps annoy the living crap out of every client I've dealt with.

      At that they're still better than most vendors.

      no, none of it is spyware, the spyware comment wa because windows machines tend to pick them up quite quickly, so that even if you avoid the spyware you stiill have a bunch of crappy apps on a dell that I'd rather, for the most part, do without.

    260. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by analog_line · · Score: 1

      The market for old, used Macs is about to go kerblooey because no one's going to want to buy an old 500MHz G4 off of eBay because of the Mac mini.

      Doubtful. The mini has no expansion slots, and I don't know if it will run OS9 outside of Classic mode. There is a significant (though shrinking) number of Mac users that sees no reason to move from their old machines and old OS, or even if they do need the expansion slots for some reason. (SCSI card, multiple hard drives, etc).

    261. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      The market for used Macs may go kerblooey, but not because of their inability to retain value. A 3 year old Mac is very nearly as useful as a new Mac, and I think it will still be as true three years from now as it is today and three years ago. That 500MHz G4 of eBay will get depreciated because of the mini, but that's not going to happen to a 500MHz PowerBook or 500MHz iBook or a PowerMac or an iMac because they all fill different niches:

      The mini can't replace an iBook for portability, or a PowerBook for versatility. The mini can't replace the PowerMac for expansion (4 ATA drives or 2 SATA drives, 2 CPUs, etc), or the iMac for it's display and simplicity.

      In some situations, yes, someone will chose a mini over a PowerMac (I am in that kind of situation since I don't really need 4 ATA drives since I use Firewire enclosures), but I still expect to be able to sell my PowerMac for several hundred dollars to someone who does want to RAID 4 120GB IDE drives together for some reason.

    262. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Good question. But yes, it works fine.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    263. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Insightfill · · Score: 1

      I'm game, too! Shipping is the big killer with CRT-style monitors, so if you've got extra and are close to the Chicago area, I want in!

    264. Re:Headless Alternative for Less by Nova1313 · · Score: 1

      by headset i mean mic and headphones all at once over a usb cord. Sorry had to clarify.

      --
      There exists some positive integer N that you are the Nth person to read this signature.
  6. Shouldn't this be in the "No Shit, Sherlock" dept? by weekendgeek · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Talk about a dupe.....

    --
    It would be presumptuous to conclude that Americans have no right to know what is being done in their name
  7. Are we a bit late? by koi88 · · Score: 0, Redundant


    Good morning!
    Wasn't this thing announced on Tuesday?

    --

    I don't need a signature.
  8. NEWS FLASH! by TupperTrenine · · Score: 1

    Linux goes open source!!!

  9. In other news by pnevin · · Score: 5, Funny

    We're getting unconfirmed rumours that President Kennedy's been shot. Can anyone clarify this?

    1. Re:In other news by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Ok, that was f-ing funny!

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:In other news by kentaromiura · · Score: 1

      it's only a rumor..



      by secret service

      --
      GCS/T/O -d+ -p c++++(++) l+++ u++ e+ m+@ s+/+ n+(--) h* f++(+++) !g w(+) t r+(++) y?
    3. Re:In other news by smallguy78 · · Score: 2, Funny

      from the 'look-two-day-old-news dept.'

      --
      Nothing costs nothing
    4. Re:In other news by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      From eyewitness accounts pnevin, there were 3 or 4 shots, fired from a book repository. More to follow as it happens.

    5. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Kennedy's been elected president??

    6. Re:In other news by jcupitt65 · · Score: 1
      Also, did you hear about John Lennon?

      He and Cynthia have split!!!

    7. Re:In other news by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

      Joe Kennedy is president?

    8. Re:In other news by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      He's dead. Netcraft confirmed it.

  10. No PS/2? by O-SUSHi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they're going to make it BYODKM (or whatever it is), they could've at least included PS/2 ports...

    --
    Remember children, all generalizations are wrong.
    1. Re:No PS/2? by gorim · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      People still have ps/2 keyboards and mice ???? Let me guess, you would hook up your 10 year-old 14" SVGA monitor to it ?

    2. Re:No PS/2? by Bander · · Score: 1

      PS2 ports are so 2002. USB keyboards are readily available and cheap. Adding two PS2 ports to the Mac mini would have taken up a pretty good chunk of the backplane for very little gain.

      - Bander

    3. Re:No PS/2? by DarKnyht · · Score: 1

      Apple did away with most legacy ports a long time ago. My iBook is over two years old and all it has on it is Firewire and USB, and all the machines made back then only came with USB and Firewire.

      --
      Voting them all out of office, now that's change I can believe in.
    4. Re:No PS/2? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      People still have ps/2 keyboards and mice ???? Let me guess, you would hook up your 10 year-old 14" SVGA monitor to it ?

      Why is this suprising to you? My PS/2 keyboard has the tactile feel I like and my Logitech PS/2 Marble trackball is absolutely irreplaceable. I've yet to find a three button USB trackball on the market that doesn't have a god damn scrollwheel.

    5. Re:No PS/2? by cbiagini · · Score: 1
      USB keyboards are readily available and cheap. Adding two PS2 ports to the Mac mini would have taken up a pretty good chunk of the backplane for very little gain.
      I want to agree, but consider this--my family's eMachines uses a PS/2 keyboard. So does my roommate's Dell. These aren't top-of-the-line machines by any stretch, but they're not too old. The appeal of swapping a tower for the Mac mini is diminished ever-so-slightly if you have to go out and buy a $35 keyboard. Especially if you don't know that when you buy the Mac, and don't find out until you go to plug it in.

      Don't get me wrong, I think the Mac mini is great, but I hear PC users bitch about this kind of thing all the time.
    6. Re:No PS/2? by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, remember this doohickey was made for people like me; I'd love to get a good go on OSX, but I ain't got the spare cash and haven't thought of a way to bullshit work into buying me one yet.

      What I do have, though, is PC hardware coming out of my arse (although the cream is helping....) so the cost of me getting a Mac just went from £1000 to £350. Well, a little more, since I'd need a bigger HDD than standard. Mind you, it's probably a standard 2.5" disk, as no doubt we'll see as soon as someone breaks one open.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    7. Re:No PS/2? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Buy a KVM that takes PS/2 inputs and spits out USB signals then. I plan to do that if I need a KVM, since my keyboard of choice (IBM M-Series) isn't made with a USB connector.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    8. Re:No PS/2? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Just get a PS/2-to-USB KVM switch such as the IOGear GCS52U, available from thousands of disreputable merchants on the Internet.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    9. Re:No PS/2? by Lurker+McLurker · · Score: 1

      PS/2 may be outdated, but many people still have PS/2 keyboards. Apple are marketing this as something people can plug their old keyboards and mice into, when it is not in fact the case.

      --
      Mod parent up!
    10. Re:No PS/2? by Cmdr+TECO · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was going to buy one, but then I found out they didn't include a 20ma current loop. WTF? How do they expect me to connect my Teletype?!?

      --
      echo 33676832766569823265328479713269.8639857989Pq | dc
    11. Re:No PS/2? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      USB keyboards are hard to find on the high-street. *every* keyboard on sale in the local store is PS/2.

      I just ordered the apple one.. a little pricy but it'll fit the same decor and look nice.

    12. Re:No PS/2? by krisp · · Score: 1

      or for a third of the price get one of these:

      USB to PS2 Adapter USB a /(2) MINIDIN6F

      1 usb port to 2 female minidin

    13. Re:No PS/2? by O-SUSHi · · Score: 0

      I actually use an IBM Model M keyboard, I also have a few friends that also use these keyboards. It feels great is and the greatest keyboard I have ever used - however, that's probably because I've always used cheap keyboards... xD

      --
      Remember children, all generalizations are wrong.
    14. Re:No PS/2? by Moby+Cock · · Score: 1

      The thing that gets me is this: There are two USB ports. One for the Keyboard and one for the mouse. How do I plug in my iPod (if I had one)? I know, USB hubs are not too expensive, but Mac Mini owners are almost going to have to buy one. Add another $30 - $50 to the price.

    15. Re:No PS/2? by hazee · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but plug in a USB keyboard and USB mouse and you've got no more free USB ports. So you need to get a USB hub now. Or a more expensive keyboard with its own USB ports.

    16. Re:No PS/2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd probably use a USB hub. If you're using Apple keyboards, they already have a USB hub built-in so you can plug the mouse into it and then you have a free USB port in the back.

    17. Re:No PS/2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have to say that one of the things that generally makes Apple great is that they don't hold on to the past when it's not practical. PS/2 is not practical any longer. It takes up a good bit of room, adds more complexity (albeit not much) to the system, and most modern machines already have USB ports anyway. While this may be a little snag in Apple's plan, I think people need to just get with 2005 already and get some USB peripherals. Hell, from Apple's site their USB keyboard and mouse is $59.00 (or it was the other day). I think that's pretty dang reasonable for some nice input devices.

    18. Re:No PS/2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you daisychain your mouse through the extra port on your keyboard? Then you have the other port on the back of the box still free.
      (my Logitech keyboard has the extra port on it)

    19. Re:No PS/2? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Method 1: Plug your iPod into the Firewire port (not applicable to iPod shuffle[2]).

      Method 2: Get a keyboard which has a USB port or two built in, such as Apple's USB keyboard (highly recommended by the Apple store!)

      [2] Do not eat iPod shuffle.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    20. Re:No PS/2? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      All the USB keyboards I've seen have a port on the side for the mouse, so you only need one.

      OTOH USB hubs are dirt cheap.

    21. Re:No PS/2? by Moby+Cock · · Score: 1

      Two good points. The catch is that, IMHO, Apple is trying to woo new users to the Aplle world with this product. Such people do not have Apple USB keyboards, thus no USB ports on them. (BTW, that is a cool feature and if I get a Mac I may splurge and get a new keyboard too). Either way, You have to get a keyboard or a hub. Not just for iPod. My digital camera is only USB.

    22. Re:No PS/2? by Angostura · · Score: 1

      The Apple USB keyboard (which is nice to type on) has two USB ports out of the back for expansion.

    23. Re:No PS/2? by MacBorg · · Score: 1

      Fool. Just BUY a PS2-USB adaptor and cease your whining!

    24. Re:No PS/2? by Megane · · Score: 1
      The only ones I've seen with a built-in hub have either been from Apple or designed for Macs by third-party companies like MacAlly. But the most common used USB keyboard out there is Compaq's, which doesn't include a hub. I've even found a USB keyboard (from a crappy Wyse WinCE terminal) with a PS/2 mouse port on the side, but no hub.

      It's not like hubs aren't cheap. Fry's regularly has a mini-hub on sale for $10 every weekend, and I've even seen them for $10 with a $10 mail-in rebate. Pretty soon, they're going to be packing USB mini-hubs into breakfast cereal boxes.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    25. Re:No PS/2? by Psykechan · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, you would hook up your 10 year-old 14" SVGA monitor to it ?

      Don't do this!

      I connected a 1992 NEC Multisync to my 2004 Powerbook and the monitor never displayed anything ever again. It could be coincidence but needless to say, I'm a little gun shy when it comes to which monitors I use on the Mac now.

      PS/2 HID will work with a USB adapter though.

    26. Re:No PS/2? by Cavedragon · · Score: 1

      Didn't Apple jump from ADB to USB keyboards & mice anyway?

      I'll admit, I gave up my 1st gen Power PC Mac when I started building PC's from scratch, but I don't remember any Macs with PS/2 ports, anyway.

      --
      Live every day as if it were your last. Someday you'll be right.
    27. Re:No PS/2? by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      No Apple hardware has ever had PS/2 ports. It's not old-school there; it's non-existent. They went from ADB to USB.

      On another note, I went shopping at local B&M stores for a (cheap) USB keyboard the other day, and couldn't find a one. Endless PS/2 keyboards, and plenty of USB mice, but no USB keyboards. Ultimately I settled for an adapter cable ($13.49 at Radio Shack -- cheaper online, but I needed it that day).

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    28. Re:No PS/2? by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      • If they're going to make it BYODKM (or whatever it is), they could've at least included PS/2 ports...
      Hey, and it doesn't come with a paper tape reader! Ripoff!!!!

      Sincerely,
      Harry Luddite

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    29. Re:No PS/2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but Motorolla Powermac Clones had PS/2 ports in addition to ADB

    30. Re:No PS/2? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      $35.00??? You can get a Logitech Wireless keyboard/mouse combo for $25.00 from Buy.com.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    31. Re:No PS/2? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      My Powertower Pro 150 Clone had ADB and PS/2 ports.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    32. Re:No PS/2? by cbiagini · · Score: 1
      $35.00??? You can get a Logitech Wireless keyboard/mouse combo for $25.00 from Buy.com.
      Sweet heavens, man, you're right! How could I have been such a fool! Here I am, thinking people are going to be upset that they'd have to pay $35, when, in reality, they'd only have to spend $25! That's practically zero, so it totally invalidates my point! Because, you know, the average consumer scours the internet for deals instead of just going to Circuit City. (That's where I got the figure from, but this was before you blessed me with your insight.)

      I simply can't allow you to waste your bargain-shopping skills here when there are so many switchers spending $35 on keyboards at this very moment. Go! Go, for the good of the city!
  11. In other news by Boeboe · · Score: 0

    Apple also released a new device with 20 gig HD and display that allows you to listen to music on the road. The device will be called "iPod"

  12. But I heard about this on tuesday... by mongoose(!no) · · Score: 1

    Come on, /. should be a little faster about posting NEWS. What ever happened to NEWS for nerds.

    And I am planning on getting one as soon as the budget allows. All the cheap stuff that came out at Mac world looks cool, and its all cheap, but lots of little numbers added up make one big number.

    1. Re:But I heard about this on tuesday... by O-SUSHi · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but Apple has more of appeal to the metrosexual than the nerd in the 21st Century.

      --
      Remember children, all generalizations are wrong.
  13. time to fire samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear the wayback machine could use some contributors.

  14. Rumours? by Lurker+McLurker · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Er, the Mac mini has been on Apple's site for the last two days or so. Talk about a dupe, this has been the main topic of discussion on slashdot for most of the past week!

    As Cmndrtaco would say: Lame.

    --
    Mod parent up!
    1. Re:Rumours? by kentaromiura · · Score: 1

      i was joking :p

      --
      GCS/T/O -d+ -p c++++(++) l+++ u++ e+ m+@ s+/+ n+(--) h* f++(+++) !g w(+) t r+(++) y?
    2. Re:Rumours? by Megane · · Score: 1

      Can we mod this story -1, Troll or -1, Flamebait? Because as a dupe, that's all it's done. (Yes, I know there's also -1, Redundant, but that would be redundant.)

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  15. Wow! by alwsn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now if only they'd release some new type of ipod to go with this "Mac Mini" It could even be flashed based. It's a brave new world.

    1. Re:Wow! by DenDave · · Score: 0, Redundant

      yeah, somthing like the Ipod Shuffle?

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    2. Re:Wow! by schibatzu · · Score: 3, Funny

      You sir, have a keen sense of humour.

    3. Re:Wow! by Lurker+McLurker · · Score: 1

      Well, someone doesn't get the joke.

      --
      Mod parent up!
    4. Re:Wow! by Domini · · Score: 1

      They'll never do it!

      It won't sell!

    5. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having just browsed through a gazillion posts about how slow /. posted the news I guess someone got sick of it...

    6. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DenDave, I saw a perfect t-shirt that is perfect for you! http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/generic/38db/

    7. Re:Wow! by DenDave · · Score: 1

      LOL! I just ordered it!

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
  16. And Linux release OS called Linspire by camcloud1 · · Score: 0

    And...

  17. Huh? by martinX · · Score: 2, Funny

    What? Another mini?

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There 10 kinds of people on this planet, the kind that can read binary and the other

    2. Re:Huh? by DrWhizBang · · Score: 1

      What? Another mini?

      This may be a little off-topic, but you're comment struck my funny and made me think.

      Remember when Apple had a promotion with Volkswagen to give Volkswagen buyers free iPods? Well I wonder if the Apple marketing dudes are already chatting with BMW about possible product tie-ins between the Mac Mini, the iPod Mini, and the Mini Cooper.

      Just a thought.

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, contrary to popular belief this story is not a dupe - this is about the Mac Mini Mini

    4. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you totally miss iPodYourBMW?

      I can't find the Mini Cooper mentioned on the site (what, is BMW scared of diluting its brand name?) but it works perfectly fine in mine.

    5. Re:Huh? by DrWhizBang · · Score: 1

      Did you totally miss iPodYourBMW?

      Yep I did. Thanks for pointing it out.

      I can't find the Mini Cooper mentioned on the site

      Because it's not.

      (what, is BMW scared of diluting its brand name?)

      Yes, I think they are. Although I don't own a Mini so I can't check, I don't remember them having a BMW badge on them anywhere. Although I think it is really more the other way around - BMW does not run around shouting "The Mini is a BMW" for the sake of the Mini brand, not the BMW brand.

      but it works perfectly fine in mine.

      Am I allowed to hate you because you own a Beemer and an iPod, and I own neither? ;-)

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
    6. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hee hee! Well, if BMW's so intent on disowning my Mini, I'll be proud to say I don't own a Beemer. Feel free to hate me for the iPod. :)

  18. There's a petition for matching prices in the EU by eclipser_of_macfinit · · Score: 3, Informative
  19. Not News by icypyr0 · · Score: 1

    This isn't news at all, I mean, you guys just reported this a few days ago in the MacWorld post:

    http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/11/ 1616250&tid=3

  20. samzenpus? by FrenZon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone notice that all the stories on the front page are now listed as posted by 'samzenpus'? The fact that such a glaringly obvious dupe was posted kinda raised the 'this website has been hacked' alarm.

    1. Re:samzenpus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plot thickens!

      Interesting... I dont think they were posted by samzenpus yesterday...

    2. Re:samzenpus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's on the 8 to 8 overnight shift now

    3. Re:samzenpus? by jaredbpd · · Score: 1

      But if it's a hack, where are the funny MS Paint Graphics and the glaring spelling errors? Pretty weak hack...

    4. Re:samzenpus? by oneiron · · Score: 1

      I get the feeling samzenpus is just severely out of touch.

    5. Re:samzenpus? by Noryungi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anyone notice that all the stories on the front page are now listed as posted by 'samzenpus'? The fact that such a glaringly obvious dupe was posted kinda raised the 'this website has been hacked' alarm.

      Yep. Also, MetaModeration is severely out of whack.
      [Yes, I do MetaModerate from time to time...]

      --
      The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    6. Re:samzenpus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      A Slashdot editor posts without spelling errors? C'mon, that proves it's a hack.

    7. Re:samzenpus? by o'reor · · Score: 1

      Yup. Hey Taco, time to wake up !

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
    8. Re:samzenpus? by fons · · Score: 2, Informative

      He does have UID 5, so it seems legit. Unless he hacked that uid too offcourse :-)

    9. Re:samzenpus? by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 1

      Yes, because if I hacked slashdot, the first thing I'd do with my newly acquired access is...
      post mediocre duplicate stories?

      Maybe if you start seeing stories like "samzenpus 0wn5 j00" or "Slashdot launches DoS attack on samzenpus' high school website"

      THEN it's time to cry "hacked"

  21. g4? by TouchOfRed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    then why the g5 icon? yes yes picky picky :P

  22. Welcome back to planet Earth by hazee · · Score: 1

    Since the poster and editors have obviously been away...

    1. Re:Welcome back to planet Earth by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      That explains the dupe, Steve's RDF cannot reach outer space to inform them about the week's events.

  23. In Other News ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In other news Slashdot announces the release of Windows 3.1 !

  24. Espresso PC by mr.henry · · Score: 1

    This thing reminds me of the Espresso PC that came out ~ 4 years ago.

    1. Re:Espresso PC by leinhos · · Score: 1

      ...and the specs show it:

      CPU 533MHz PGA Celeron (The chipset appears to support both FC-PGA and S370)
      System Chipset Intel 810
      Hard Disk 12 GB, 2.5" x 9.5mm HDD
      RAM 128 MB of 144-pin SDRAM
      Video Card i810 integrated 3D accelerator with 4MB shared memory. (It's a sibling of the ill-fated i740).
      I/O Ports

      * 6-pin PS/2 Keyboard Port x 1
      * 6-pin PS/2 Mouse Port x 1
      * 124-pin Expansion Port x 1
      * Microphone Port x 1
      * Earphone Port x 1
      * USB Port x 2
      * External VGA Port x 1

      TV Output (NTSC/PAL) 4-pin DIN S-Video Output Port
      Built-in Sound 16-bit Stereo (Sound Blaster / Adlib compatible), Full Duplex 3-D Sound, AC 97 compatible
      Pointing Device Synaptics TouchPad with left/right click button and scrolling up/down button
      Physical Dimensions System gross weight around 460g, 150mm (L) x 106mm (W) x 32mm (H)
      Power Adapter Auto-switching. Input: 100V ~ 240V, 50 ~ 60Hz, 1.1A; Output: 15V DC, 3.0A; weighs 250g.

  25. Super-liminal advertising! by jaredbpd · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's right! If I didn't want one two days ago, re-running the front page story about it isn't going to make me want one today.

  26. Fucking shit NO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This decreases the value of my Mac!!!

    1. Re:Fucking shit NO!!! by DenDave · · Score: 1

      Don't tell me you dished out on a G5 imac? Awe that would hurt.. Anyone notice how for 1500 you get the Mini and a 20 Inch (sexy) cinema display? Dang that's why they hacked the price of those monitors last week!!

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    2. Re:Fucking shit NO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't tell me you dished out on a G5 imac?

      Yep. :(

    3. Re:Fucking shit NO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah! This new Mac Mini decreases the value of Tuesday's Mac Mini!

      Oh, wait, it's just a Slashdot editor being lazy and stupid. Which isn't news either.

    4. Re:Fucking shit NO!!! by DenDave · · Score: 1

      Awe dude, well at least you have G5 CPU but I guess that isn't much consolation... Oh well I got an Ibook last week and they just slashed the prices in Europe so I feel a bit Appled as well.. Used to be the same back in the early 90's... DenDave would get a mac and a week later prices would drop or something else came out... I am just glad that Tiger didn't come out yet, cuz that would've peeved me mucho...

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    5. Re:Fucking shit NO!!! by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1

      Uhhh, that would be like feeling bad about buying a new 2.8GHz P4 when Dell just released a new like of PIII-1.4Ghz desktops. The iMac is a much better machine.

    6. Re:Fucking shit NO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't compare apples and oranges now.

  27. Previous link and Financial results by Lord+Satri · · Score: 5, Informative

    This was previously discussed on this Slashdot story. Also of interest is this announcement :

    Apple announced their financial results for the fourth quarter today, reporting a profit of $295M, or $0.70 per share. They shipped 4.58M iPods, an increase of 525 % over the year ago quarter. But more surprisingly, Apple CPU sales were up 26% themselves over the year ago quarter. Over 1,046,000 Macs went found their way into customer's hands in the quarter.
    See http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2005/jan/12results .html

    After reading comments from the other /. story discussing the Mac Mini, I believe this Mac Mini is doomed for a **huge** success. Good for competition. Good for everyone :-)

    1. Re:Previous link and Financial results by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I bought one as soon as they were announced.

      I'm a PC person really but have been looking to do the mac-thing for a while... at this price it's definately a winner.

    2. Re:Previous link and Financial results by Ubergrendle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've been an Apple non-believer for most of my life. Since day one I considered the Apple IIe to be overrated (Commodores were better), Mac's lacked the flexibility and software that the IBM PC/AT/XT/386/486+ did. For the 1990s, Macs were overpriced and lacked software to compete realistically for an PC market share. And don't get me started on games.

      I also figured iPods would be doomed to failure. Why would people spend $400-600 on harddrive mp3 player, instead of say $150 on a flash mp3 player? How small could they get those disks anyways? As for Mac OS/X, come on...if someone could put an elegant GUI on a robust unix kernel don't you think Microsoft or IBM would have done it already??? And Apple was clearly doomed financially...has any company ever lasted long after a Microsoft payoff?

      Now, in 2005, 20 years after I gave up on Apple, everything is falling into place. They finally have production costs under control, and long term strategic chip partnership with IBM. iPods are more popular than Sony Walkman's in the day. Mac OS/X is perhaps the best operating system in the market.

      And now this. Although there's alot of Mini-ITX cases available for the PC (Apple appears to be copying the PC market), this one DOES IT RIGHT. OS is included; several very good tools and software are included. You won't be using this mini-Mac for gaming, but for internet/digital photos/word processing its an awesome setup.

      Kudos Mr Jobs. I finally consider Apple a true market player once again.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    3. Re:Previous link and Financial results by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      As for Mac OS/X, come on...if someone could put an elegant GUI on a robust unix kernel don't you think Microsoft or IBM would have done it already???
      Apple did it because it has more than 25 years of experience in GUIs, and the whole philosophy of the GUI has been what the company has been revolving around for all that time. Contrast this to Microsoft with it's general sloppyness and IBM with it's obtuse mindset about how users should adapt to their computers.
    4. Re:Previous link and Financial results by bob670 · · Score: 1

      WooHoo, I bet Steve Jobs is relieved, now that YOU think Apple is doing it right he can relax!

    5. Re:Previous link and Financial results by CountBrass · · Score: 5, Funny
      Kudos Mr Jobs. I finally consider Apple a true market player once again.

      I have a message for you from Mr Jobs: he says thanks, now he can finally sleep at night.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    6. Re:Previous link and Financial results by Paul+Rose · · Score: 1
      I've been an Apple non-believer for most of my life. Since day one I considered the Apple IIe to be overrated (Commodores were better), Mac's lacked the flexibility and software that the IBM PC/AT/XT/386/486+ did. For the 1990s, Macs were overpriced and lacked software to compete realistically for an PC market share. And don't get me started on games.
      That describes me to a tee (except that I never owned a commodore).

      When OS X came out I finally got curious.

      When the Mini came out ... I bought one!

      I have a rabid Mac fan friend (who I have to see every day) who will no doubt never let me live it down. C'est la vie

      If for some reason I don't like it, I'll throw Yellow Dog Linux on it and use it just like a cuter version of my other boxen...
    7. Re:Previous link and Financial results by Watcher · · Score: 1

      I believe this Mac Mini is doomed for a **huge** success

      Wow, what an interesting turn of phrase...that's the first time I've ever heard of something being doomed for success. Its a terribly positive fate!

    8. Re:Previous link and Financial results by justforaday · · Score: 1

      Although there's alot of Mini-ITX cases available for the PC (Apple appears to be copying the PC market), this one DOES IT RIGHT.

      And remember that small form factor PCs didn't come out until after the G4 Cube showed them how to do it right (well, except for the pricing thing). This is essentially the next generation of the cube, but at a time when the market is ready for it, and with the right price point...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    9. Re:Previous link and Financial results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, welcome to the last FIVE YEARS. Seriously, everything you mention, from iPod, to OS X, to the production costs, to chip partnership has been in place for around that long (depending on where you count the beta release of OS X). Meanwhile, the chip partnership dates back to John Sculley and 1990.

      Just waking up from a long nightmare?

    10. Re:Previous link and Financial results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I finally consider Apple a true market player once again.
      Steve Jobs: "Phew! Our decades of gargantuan success somehow felt hollow without the moronic approval of some 16-year-old posting on Slashdot as "Ubergrendel." Finally...validation!"
    11. Re:Previous link and Financial results by colinleroy · · Score: 1

      (Apple appears to be copying the PC market)

      I think you deserve a +5, Insightful. Or maybe +5, Funny...

      --
      blah
    12. Re:Previous link and Financial results by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Atari 8 Bits were way better than Commodore.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    13. Re:Previous link and Financial results by Moofie · · Score: 1

      It comes from Apple being beleaguered all the time. I know, it's counterintuitive...you'll get used to it one of these days. Keep reading Dvorak's columns...all will be made clear.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    14. Re:Previous link and Financial results by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      You won't be using this mini-Mac for gaming, but for internet/digital photos/word processing its an awesome setup.

      Are you referring to the lack of games on the mac platform, or that you think this machine is underpowered for gaming? The former certainly has some truth to it. Many games never make it to the mac, although most of the good ones do and there are a few mac only gems that Windows users will never know. As far being underpowered, what games are on the market with requirements above the mac mini? I can't think of anything except maybe Doom3, and I bet even it will be acceptable. It's minimum requirements are almost exactly the mac mini (it wants 1.5 Ghz vs. the mac mini's 1.25 or 1.42). And Doom3 is still a month away from release on the mac. The graphics card is fine for pretty much everything.

      I suppose it is not ideal for gaming, and I imagine that there will soon be games that require more resources. Still, it seems like it will be just fine for most people for gaming as well as everything else.

    15. Re:Previous link and Financial results by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      WooHoo, I bet Steve Jobs is relieved, now that YOU think Apple is doing it right he can relax!

      And unfortunately despite all of Apple's successes that have finally won me over, they're still stuck with a uber-elitist clientel base like yourself.

      Question: do you wear your black turtleneck collar up or down?

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    16. Re:Previous link and Financial results by bob670 · · Score: 1

      Please, and I say this because I care, get over yourself, the sooner the better.

    17. Re:Previous link and Financial results by liverbugg · · Score: 1
      The graphics card is fine for pretty much everything.
      A 32mb Radeon 9200 fine for everything? What world are you living on? It's not even a DX9 card (not that DX matters for opengl but the hardware features do). That card will barely run UT2004 at 640x480.
    18. Re:Previous link and Financial results by devnull17 · · Score: 1

      You won't be using this mini-Mac for gaming

      I was actually pleasantly surprised by the video hardware in the Mac Mini--there's an onboard Radeon 9200 with 32MB of dedicated video RAM. It's not top-of-the-line by any means, but it's certainly a step or two up from the CPU-taxing, shared-memory crap that you get on most bargain Intel PC's.

    19. Re:Previous link and Financial results by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      A 32mb Radeon 9200 fine for everything? What world are you living on? It's not even a DX9 card (not that DX matters for opengl but the hardware features do). That card will barely run UT2004 at 640x480.

      I have never ran a Radeon 9200, but my Geforce 5200 with 32 mb or ran, runs UT2004 just fine. Is there a big performance difference? Why even mention DX for a mac? DX is Microsoft proprietary, Windows only technology.

      I just glanced at the Windows benchmarks and it looks like the 9200 runs at about 10-20% slower, mostly due to it's lack of DX support for a number of features. I can't imagine most people have any problem playing UT2004 on it. Heck, it even runs acceptably on my old 16 mb video card in my server. Maybe you need to look into more RAM or something.

    20. Re:Previous link and Financial results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And unfortunately despite all of Apple's successes that have finally won me over, they're still stuck with a uber-elitist clientel base like yourself.


      Unfortunately, dispite all of Apple's successes, they're still stuck with a uber-elitist anti-Apple trolls that think it's a big deal when they finally start to accept that Apple is a successful company.

    21. Re:Previous link and Financial results by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Ha... plug a USB pad into that thing... hook it onto TV add SNES, ZSNES or any other emulator fetch out the roms (you legally own of course) and you have the best gaming brick ever made....

    22. Re:Previous link and Financial results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's called an XBox.

    23. Re:Previous link and Financial results by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      The X-Box is not portable and you have to hack it open to do all those things....

    24. Re:Previous link and Financial results by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      So? It's cheaper than getting a mac mini, and you can play xbox games.

  28. What is this, a troll? by utexaspunk · · Score: 2

    Come ON... this story was obviously posted just to get a thousand "DUPE!" comments...

    Slashdot: -1, Troll

  29. Re:Steve Jobs does it again by kristeh1337 · · Score: 1

    Is this part of a new trend in slashdot fellatio?

  30. Experiences? by BenjyD · · Score: 1

    I might end up needing a Mac soon (software for work only Mac/Windows and I'm not working in Windows). I've played around with eMacs, which this looks to be similar in performance to, but never worked seriously on one.

    Anybody out there used an eMac for development work? Upgraded to 512mb, are they usable for general C/C++ development or is the Powermac the only way to go for anything beyond email and word processing?

    1. Re:Experiences? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I've not used an eMac, but my last PowerBook had a similar spec to the Mac Mini. 256MB or RAM is not enough. I had 256MB for a while when one of my DIMMs died, and it was painful. At the same time, I was borrowing a 867MHz G4 tower which had 512MB and felt a whole lot faster. Switching between a running application and the debugger took a noticeable amount of time, as did switching to Safari to view documentation. With 512MB, these things happened almost instantly on both machines.

      I have done low-level C work and high-level Objective-C work on both machines, and found them to be perfectly acceptable in terms of performance. I haven't touched the abomination of a language known as C++ for some time, and hope never to have to again, so I can't really give you any advice there (other than to look at Objective-C). XCode is a really nice IDE to use, and code written using POSIX libraries and Cocoa can be ported to other *NIX platforms and GNUstep very easily.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Experiences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      eMac is great for dev work, given enough RAM.

    3. Re:Experiences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll be fine, unless by 'development' you mean 'Doom 3'. (I don't use an eMac, I use a G3/400. It's fine.)

    4. Re:Experiences? by Angostura · · Score: 1

      I'd ask in the developers' section in the Apple discussion boards. There are some pretty clueful people there. They will probably enthuse about the bundled dev tools too.

    5. Re:Experiences? by isaac · · Score: 1

      I bought a refurb eMac last year from Apple, slapped in a 1GB DIMM from transintl.com (eMacs are picky about 1GB DIMMs, as they're not officially supported), and added an extra 19" CRT for a dual-monitor setup.

      It's a great workstation. Not as fast in raw CPU horsepower as the P4 I use at work, but I'm rarely cpu-bound. 1.5GB RAM is probably overkill for development (my wife needs it for photoshop, though).

      The best thing is the dual-head setup. I use the 19" CRT as my primary workspace and keep palettes, terminal windows, email, notes, etc. open on the internal 17" monitor. That's one thing the Mac mini can't do.

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    6. Re:Experiences? by Herbmaster · · Score: 1

      Anybody out there used an eMac for development work? Upgraded to 512mb, are they usable for general C/C++ development or is the Powermac the only way to go for anything beyond email and word processing?

      No. Prior to the advent of 1.25 GHz chips, no one did C/C++ development. Duh.

      --
      I'm not a smorgasbord.
    7. Re:Experiences? by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1
      I've played around with eMacs, which this looks to be similar in performance to, but never worked seriously on one.
      Was it only I who though "eMacs? What does GNU Emacs have to do with this? And what's up with that strange capitalization... Oh..." ;-)
    8. Re:Experiences? by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      You mean there were Macs prior to MacOSX? I had no idea ;)

      I guess I did phrase my question a bit badly. Basically I meant is the eMac performance going to annoy a developer (doing debugging etc.) enough that the PowerMac is a worthwhile investment.

      Developers also had different performance expectations in the past: a P3-600 must have seemed pretty fast when new, but the one in my laptop is slow enough to be annoying now.

    9. Re:Experiences? by Herbmaster · · Score: 1

      Right, whether or not you'll be satisfied with the performance of an eMac or Mac mini depends entirely on your demands and expectations. (And how long you plan on keeping the machine before replacing it/upgrading it!) There are few things that could cause these computers to be total failures for you: if your idea of a development workstation is a dual head system, if you're developing 3D games and need fancier video acceleration, or if you need a 64-bit CPU for some reason. But for the most part, it's just a matter of how big your project is and how long you mind waiting for compiles. If you're a CS undergrad student working on programming assignments, no problem.

      For the past 3.5 years my primary C/C++ development environment has been a 933 MHz Pentium 3. Obviously I would not recommend anyone buy such a thing today, but the only reason it's somewhat inadequate for the work I do on it is that some of my projects are so huge that it can take quite a while just to scan all the source and object files to see if any of the binaries need to be compiled or linked prior to a debug session - even if none of them do. For Java dev, the machine actually is totally inadequate. But that's mainly because I use Eclipse, not the project's fault.

      The point is, if you haven't used an even somewhat comparable Mac before for development work, you'll have to try one and find out what will meet your needs.

      --
      I'm not a smorgasbord.
    10. Re:Experiences? by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      I own a DP G5 but I actually do all my dev' work (web/css/Java/J2EE) on my PowerBook: AL 1.5GHz G4 with 2GB of memory and it's just fine: not as fast as my G5 obviously (builds take a couple of seconds instead of near instant) but fast enough that I don't find it even slightly irritating.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    11. Re:Experiences? by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      An eMac is perfectly usable for development work. Xcode runs well, and a plethora of text editors obviously work fine. I usually use XEmacs and XCode for mine. Check out Ars Technica's Apple forum (www.arstechnica.com, follow the link to the forums) if you want to ask specific, pointed questions about the suitability of a particular Mac. Still, the eMac is a nice machine.

      Whether you'll be happy with the performance depends to some degree on what you're doing; if you're compiling huge programs, the dual G5 is nice. Keep in mind that the dual processors mean that the machine will remain very responsive while one processor compiles, or encodes music, or whatever other CPU-intensive tasks you throw at it. Obviously it costs a lot more money, but it will also hold its resale value better. Generally, I think you're better off buying the cheapest DP machine you can and buying/using an external monitor, which will allow for much better general performance and more expandability. If you're solely interested in C/C++ development, though, you'll be fine on any Mac Apple sells.

    12. Re:Experiences? by BigZaphod · · Score: 1

      Not just the RAM.. the bus speed on the portables (and the Mac Mini) is very very slow compared to the speeds of the normal desktop machines. That can make a huge difference in terms of performance. Although, yes, not having enough RAM for OSX is a bad thing too. 512MB seems to be the sweet spot.

    13. Re:Experiences? by keytoe · · Score: 1
      and code written using POSIX libraries and Cocoa can be ported to other *NIX platforms and GNUstep very easily.
      Whoa, there partner. Saying that porting from Cocoa to GNUstep is easy is stretching it a bit. True, as long as you stick with the Foundation classes - but as soon as you move into AppKit, you're not going to have an easy time porting. Cocoa and GNUstep have been diverging pretty heavily in the last few years.

      On top of it, Apple keeps adding really nice touches to the core frameworks with each revision (ie, Cocoa Bindings, richer model objects in Tiger, etc), so even the Foundation classes are diverging.

      Dead on for POSIX, though.
    14. Re:Experiences? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Cocoa and GNUstep have been diverging pretty heavily in the last few years

      Not true. GNUstep continues to track changes in the Cocoa APIs. Sure, it's not all there, and you do need to re-do your NIB files in GORM, but most of the common classes and quite a few of the less common ones are done. As long as you avoid Carbon calls, porting is not hard.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    15. Re:Experiences? by keytoe · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I hadn't looked at the state of GNUStep for a while - and I'm glad to hear that they are keeping current. Thanks for pointing it out and kudos to the GNUStep team!

  31. Kinda meager on the specs... by PornMaster · · Score: 0, Troll

    When you start with the 1.42 GHz, up it to a gig of RAM, a superdrive, bluetooth, wireless keyboard and mouse, and give it a 3 year warranty, it's up to $1422, you don't have nifty Mac stuff like video-in, and you have a CPU that compares to what was out a few years ago.

    Is this really a good deal?

    1. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Go with the basic. Get the RAM and keyboard from 3rd parties.. a *lot* less than $1422.

      3 year warranty is pointless - I'd have the lid off within 30 minutes.

    2. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by presearch · · Score: 4, Funny

      Funny how that works..
      I buy a $500 thing, add $1000 more in options, and it increases the cost 300% !!!!!
      Outrageous. Damn Apple.

    3. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you're going to do all that, why are you buying a mini? You could get a decent G5 or something for just a little bit more than that. I don't think the point of the mini is to upgrade the heck out of it, but rather to just buy something that works as a "my first Mac" experience. Anyway, just my $0.02.

    4. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1
      YEah, but who in the target market really is going to need a gig of ram, bluetooth, or the 1.42Ghz chip? I mean at that point, get a full blown iMac and be done with it. Chances are people who will be buying these machines will be people like my dad. Already has a monitor, keyboard, mouse and looking for an updated computer to replace his 6 year old compaq.

      So long as it checks emails and stock quotes he doesn't care. The fact that he won't have to deal with every virus under the sun too looks attractive at $500.

      As far as other home users. I am still using a 2.5 year old 700Mhz g3 ibook with 256MB ram. I run iPhoto with 2k pictures fine, import DV home movies for editing just fine. Sure it maybe a little sluggish and if I have 10 apps running it will slow down, but it continues to get the job done. Really the only thing I am lacking is a superdrive.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    5. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      Is 256M not enough RAM to run OSX comfortably?

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    6. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative
      When you start with the 1.42 GHz

      I haven't really noticed much speed difference between my current machine (1.5GHz G4) and my last one (1.25GHz G4), so I wouldn't bother with this. Even big compiles and video editing only gain a small amount.

      up it to a gig of RAM

      Never buy RAM from Apple. They charge 2-3 times the value of the RAM for installation.

      a superdrive

      If you really need to burn DVDs. I've got some use from my SuperDrive, but I wouldn't consider it essential. Waiting a year and adding a FireWire Blu-Ray / HD-DVD drive might be a better bet.

      bluetooth

      You can get a USB bluetooth module on eBay for a quarter of what Apple charge for internal Bluetooth. And yes, OS X will almost certainly support it.

      wireless keyboard and mouse

      So get a wired one.

      and give it a 3 year warranty

      It comes with a 1 year warranty. Adding another two years for a third of the price of the machine doesn't sound like a great deal. I'd be more inclined to throw it out and replace it with a newer and faster one if it breaks after the first year.

      you don't have nifty Mac stuff like video-in

      My PowerBook has exactly the same video-in capabilities as the Mac Mini - a FireWire port. Neither machine has any analogue video input capability, and neither does any recent Mac I've seen without 3rd party hardware (and if you really need it, there are analogue -> FireWire boxes available).

      and you have a CPU that compares to what was out a few years ago.

      And is still used in the current PowerBook line, and is probably fast enough for most people.

      Is this really a good deal?

      If you insist on adding every possible customisation to it, then no. If the basic model (perhaps with the RAM upgraded to 512MB) is good enough for your needs, then yes.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      Can anyone tell me if this uses a laptop hard drive? By the size, I would expect that it does. I don't see anything on apples site that says one way or another. There's quite a difference between 5400RPM and 7200RPM. On top of that, laptop drives don't get any larger thjan 80GB, right?

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    8. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by gunnk · · Score: 1

      It's not so different than any other vendor, so why call out Apple in particular over this one?

      I was generating quotes on computers for a co-worker yesterday that recently lost her house to a fire. I checked Apple, Dell and HP. In EACH case, the $500 range computers were substantially over $1000 once I added all the components you would want for a primary home system.

      In terms of the Mac mini, I wouldn't buy one for my main system, but I *would* consider one as my home file server or small web server. I wouldn't add a keyboard or mouse and could stick it under my router. I'd add some RAM, but still pay no more than $700 or so.

      These are also great systems for someone looking to replace an older PC with a Mac to go with their iPod (which is the market I think Apple is aiming at here). Plug in your existing monitor, add a keyboard and mouse, and you are ready to run. I would strongly recommend more RAM, but if you are just using the web, email, and iTunes it will do the job as is. Not a bad choice as a replacement for you mom's malware-laden Windows ME machine.

      --
      Life is short: void the warranty.
    9. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by Alakaboo · · Score: 1

      At that point, you'd be buying the computer for reasons of shape and size, or because you want a headless G4, not a G5.

      An equivalently-spec'd PowerMac G5 would run you about $2,150, so in many ways the Mac mini is still a good deal.

    10. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by emilymildew · · Score: 1

      You know, I was thinking about that too, but I would never by a 1st gen product from Apple and then immediately void my warranty. It's just asking for trouble.

      Give it a cycle or two to get the kinks out and then have at it, but don't do that for a 1st gen unless you want a $500 paperweight.

    11. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by Sefi915 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Never buy RAM from Apple. They charge 2-3 times the value of the RAM for installation

      It's either buy the RAM from Apple and have them install it pre-ship, or buy it from CompUSA/Apple Store, have them install it in-house.

      Because the MacMini is not user servicable, and if you're not ADT (Apple Desktop Technican Certified) *poof* your warranty will go up in smoke.

    12. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by Angostura · · Score: 1

      It runs OK, but not comfortably. 512Mb is comfortable in my opinion.

    13. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by jaredbpd · · Score: 1

      Interesting post on upgrading the mini, but you're taking it out of the marketing context. The people who the mini is being marketed at might not know to buy their RAM from a 3rd party and to search eBay for the other peripherals. They're the iPod users who see Apple as the Big Shining Sole Source for all things mildly translucent.

    14. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I have owned half a dozen Macs over the years, and my company has purchased dozens. In my personal experience I have only had ONE Mac die, after TEN years of use.

      Skip the 3 year warranty unless you have chronic bad luck.

    15. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by Jahz · · Score: 1

      OSX will run fine with 256K. Just dont try playing Unreal 2004 or advanced DV editing.
      If you have the cash, get 512MB and you'll be just fine.
      Power users should have no less than 768MB. This is what I have in my PowerBook G4 and I rarely run out.
      Software developers should have no less than 1GB, for compiling, testing and debugging programs.
      Audio/Video specialists should get a few gig's of memory.
      Of course, power users and up, probably wont want to use this machine anyway.

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
    16. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compare those very same specs with an iBook. I think you'll find them to be *identical*.

      There are a lot of people happy with the performance of an iBook. This is just cheaper (and non-portable).

    17. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by OmegaNine · · Score: 1

      I have been wanting a mac for a while, if nothing more than for the software. I love the OSX. My only gripe was the price of hardware. Now I can get a mac and not pay an arm and a leg. For the price, I think it will look nice next to my tower with a KV switch. Only real draw back I see is the HDD space, but thats what the USB is for, 80 gigs will do for programs, and I can run my MP3's and movies off a external. In short, I think they made the right move brining the price down, if I end up hooked, I will get a more powerfull box, and I don't think im alone. OmegaNine

    18. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by Corbie · · Score: 1

      Sweet fancy moses! I buy something, then I buy more things, and it . . . COSTS MORE MONEY! Where will this consumer nightmare end?? Oh, God!

    19. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by Tombstone-f · · Score: 1

      Your warranty will only "go up in smoke" if you damage the machine. They're only recommending you don't service it yourself.

    20. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Never buy RAM from Apple. They charge 2-3 times the value of the RAM for installation.

      There's a problem with that statement. Apple employees have said many times that people installing their own RAM hurts their bottom-line, so with the Mini they made the RAM not user installable. In fact, and I talked to a Apple Store manager on Tuesday about this, the Apple Store and other stores that sell Apple won't even be allowed to install RAM. You have to ship it back to the factor to pay Apple for the RAM and per hour to install it. Moral of the story, you're right that they charge too much, and now they want to make you pay it.

    21. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by equiraptor · · Score: 1

      If the basic model (perhaps with the RAM upgraded to 512MB) is good enough for your needs, then yes.

      This is why the Mac Mini is of interest to me. It would be the perfect computer for my mother. It's fast enough for everything she needs to do, usable, and (compared with the Windows 98 SE they're running now) secure. And it's $653 with 512M RAM and a wireless card on the 1.25GHz. Perfect!

    22. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by paranode · · Score: 1

      The point is, Apple charges too much for these options. Let's do this properly: You will probably want 512M to run OS X at bearable speeds. You also need a keyboard, so lets add the cheapest wired one. Now your base $499 Apple is already at $632. Want to upgrade the processor by 170MHz? Another $100. This stuff really adds up fast (honestly they should throw in the keyboard).

    23. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      The point is that it doesn't come with a keyboard or stuff like that. It's designed for all the people going "I want to try a mac, but I don't want to have to buy a whole new system for their prices, and I don't want a one button mouse or a new keyboard and monitor (I can't tell you how many times I heard that when someone suggested buying an emac or iMac for their test experience)

      Let's do this the smart way:

      $500 for the base mini. $53 for some third party memory upgrade (though the $75 tag isn't bad if you don't want to install it yourself), $7 for a keyboard if you don't have one, $5 for an optical USB mouse if you don't have one. So we're up to $565 total?

      And that processor upgrade also includes an HDD upgrade.

      Look, these things aren't supposed to be the next server systems, they're supposed to be a basic introduction to the mac world for people who don't want to buy a new monitor keyboard and mouse just to try a mac.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    24. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Funny how that works.. I buy a $500 thing, add $1000 more in options, and it increases the cost 300% !!!!!

      It increases the price 200%.

      I hate it when nerds can't count.

    25. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by UWC · · Score: 1
      It sounds like more than a recommendation:

      Memory upgrade must be performed by an Apple Authorized Service provider

      From the Mac mini Technical Specifications page (the last fine print bullet point at the bottom of the page).

    26. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you have at least two years of warranty guaranteed by law, regardless of what the box says (only if you bought it within the EU, of course)

    27. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really,
      Try reading the 20 plus posts near the top of the thread that address this non-topic. This has always been Apple's policy. Adding ram is not a warranty breaker.
      You're welcome.

    28. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "If you really need to burn DVDs. I've got some use from my SuperDrive, but I wouldn't consider it essential. Waiting a year and adding a FireWire Blu-Ray / HD-DVD drive might be a better bet."

      I've got a question on something I ran into on my iBook that would relate to the mini.

      My iBook has the combo drive..won't burn DVD's. I plan on getting a firewire DVD burner to hook to it. I just upgraded to Panther on this unit...I had the iLife3..but, it would not let me install since the unit did not have a superdrive. Would it have let me install if I'd had the DVD firewire drive attached (haven't bought it yet)...

      I'm curious if this mini will let you run iDVD if you don't have a superdrive in the unit...but, did have an external one. I'm wondering if it will work and worth the money to buy the firewire dvd burner for my iBook. I'd want to use it on the mini too if I got one...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    29. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      iDVD 4 does not work with DVD writers other than the Apple SuperDrive and will only burn DVD-R. iDVD 5 works with DVD+R/-R/+RW/-RW and Steve implied (although didn't state outright) that it would work with third party drives.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    30. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a quick note, no it does NOT have a 1 year warranty. It has a 90 day warranty followed by a grudging warranty to a year on the hardware only if you really have a hardware problem, in the opinion of the phone monkey you reach.

      I had 4 problems with my iBook and the phone monkey wanted to put my credit card at risk for, what, $200. Oh thank YOU Mr. Steve "Blow" Jobs.

    31. Re:Kinda meager on the specs... by WMD_88 · · Score: 1

      My former chemistry teacher runs 10.3 on 128MB. When I asked him about the machine, he didn't mention it being slow.

  32. This is new? by bugbeak · · Score: 1

    And what of the Macworld announcement?

  33. Thank God! by Roofus · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I'm so glad you posted this to confirm the mac mini. Watching Steve Jobs on stage introducing it just wasn't enough to make me believe it was true.

    I think Slashdot is getting retarded.

    1. Re:Thank God! by dprovine · · Score: 1

      I think Slashdot is getting retarded.

      "Getting"?

  34. WTF!!! What a obvious dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all posted over 1900 comments on Tuesday.
    Then here same subject again.
    Moderators stop smoking crack and wake up from letargy.
    You just fucked up my day at 8 a.m with this old news.

  35. Old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just three weeks ago a tsunami killed over 60.000 people.

    Doesn't anyone check these articles before they get published?

  36. How many would it take... by Epistax · · Score: 1

    ...to fill a burning Volkswagen Beetle plunging off a bridge? Would they be able to store a library of congress on the way down?

  37. Software software software by acomj · · Score: 4, Informative

    yes Its more expensive and slower, except if you value some of the excellent software it comes with and the small form factor its worth it.

    imovie is an excellent video editor (enough better the compaq with various cheap editing packages)was abandoned...(Not to mention this apple machine comes with firewire, a requirement for getting video off the cam corder.)

    iphoto is excellent photo storage tool.

    OS X is pretty good to, but if you want a windows box go nuts..

  38. welcome to last week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welcome to last week fuckass!

  39. And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Imagine a random university lab buying 10.000 of these boxes to make a beowulf cluster out of them...

    1. Re:And now... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I did consider buying half a dozen of these as a cheap cluster (not for real work, just for testing / debugging code designed for cluster deployment). The problem is that there is no fast interconnect on them. No PCI slots means no infiniband (or whatever). The ethernet is only 100Mb/s, and the FireWire is only 400Mb/s. If it had FW800, that might be more interesting, although it would need a minimum of two ports for it to be useful, with more being preferable.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  40. Re:Steve Jobs does it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually I think Steve reads /. regularly. He posts as Dancin Santa or something of the like..

  41. Moving toward the pc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The apple website seems to claim that after you "plug in your usb mouse and keyboard" you can connect your cameras and devices, etc... But only having two usb ports seems to limit what you can do. Yeah, you can add a usb hub, but it seems that the clean mac image seems to stop with the case, after that, you're just going to have a bunch of of aftermarket parts hooked onto a pretty apple device.

    1. Re:Moving toward the pc? by kers · · Score: 1

      Well, all of Apples (and all the other usb keyboards i've seen) for mac got a usb hub built in to them. You plug the keyboards usb cable into the computer, and plug your mouse into one of the two ports on the keyboard. Voila - even tho you got both mouse and keyboard hooked up, you still got two ports free :)

      And if you are a ereet d00d you are using bluetooth, so you got both of the ports on the box available anywas ;)

    2. Re:Moving toward the pc? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple keyboards contain a small USB hub, providing two additional ports. One is usually used for the mouse, and I've plugged a USB dongle into the other one in the past. If you use an Apple keyboard (which I would strongly recommend - trying to work out how windows and alt map to command and option can be a pain since it seems to vary between manufacturers) leaves you with 2 USB slots free.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Moving toward the pc? by bradleyland · · Score: 1

      Certain devices (such as digital cameras) will complain that they are plugged into the keyboard. You get an error message that reads something along the lines of "device plugged into low-power USB port", or something like that. If I were to buy a Mac Mini, I think the $129 WiFi + bluetooth option would be a no brainer. Who buys a small form factor computer, only to plug a bunch of external clutter into it?

    4. Re:Moving toward the pc? by glennrrr · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you are buying a new USB keyboard, you should look into 3rd party Mac keyboards. While the Apple keyboard is quite nice, there are others; I have a Matias Tactile Pro on my desktop G5 at work which I like. It has a good feel, and should survive millions of presses.

      Here's a recent discussion about 3rd party keyboards: http://www.lowendmac.com/misc/05/0110.html

      And it is true, keyboards are non-powered hubs and you can only rely on them for low-powered devices. For instance, half of USB thumb drives will work from a keyboard (more or less). I doubt if the iPod Shuffle will work very well out of a keyboard; probably won't charge, and won't get USB 2.0 speed transfers.

    5. Re:Moving toward the pc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Apple keyboards contain a small USB hub

      Huh? I've bought about a dozen Apple keyboards in the past six months for work, and not a one has a USB hub. The Apple keyboard, that I bought directly from Apple with my PowerBook, I'm using now doesn't. Maybe they did at one time, but they apparently don't now.

  42. This isn't "isn't" by Himring · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is so much not news, that all the redundant posts saying this isn't news isn't news, and even this post isn't a post. As a matter of fact, I'm questioning "isn't" right now, cuz it just "isn't" ... is it?

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  43. Wake up early? by slowtech · · Score: 1, Redundant

    From the cryogenic freeze you put yourself in on Tuesday?

    How lame is this for a dupe?

    --
    "Well it's not Victory - but then it's not Death either."
  44. Gigabyte Macs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taiwanese (crap manufacturers IMHO) Gigabyte and Abit will probably soon start releasing cheapo Macs too. Where are we heading? When will we see these at Wallmart?

  45. PC stands for "personal computer"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, they do use PowerPC chips!

    1. Re:PC stands for "personal computer"... by ceeam · · Score: 1

      Yes, but PC in PowerPC stands for "Performance Chip".

  46. WoW Req. by Fr05t · · Score: 1

    I'm just upset it doesn't meet the min. req. for World of Warcraft. I was seriously considering buying one if it did. Maybe down the road when I need a computer for browsing the web, and email I'll get one.

    1. Re:WoW Req. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it does meet the minimum requirements, just get a simple RAM upgrade - conveniently easy to select when purchasing.

    2. Re:WoW Req. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      WoW needs 1GB to be happy anyway otherwise you get massive lag from all the swapping... You could add a 1GB stick (from Crucial - don't pay Apple prices for the memory!!) and it'd probably run OK.

      The graphics are less of an issue.. just turn them down until it works.

      For a low-end machine it's not too bad. It's not really a games machine... I know a lot of people who could really use this - mostly they muck around on itunes and maybe write some emails. Some of them have cheap powerbooks & this gives a lower entry-level for the others.

    3. Re:WoW Req. by chrome · · Score: 1

      for over $400!

      No, get some cheaper 2700DDR.

    4. Re:WoW Req. by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      My 800MHz iMac G4 seems to run the game fine, despite being below minreq on CPU speed. But I do have 768MB RAM in it. I also play WoW on my PC, so I guess this post is beside the point.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    5. Re:WoW Req. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of the reason I bought one was to *hopefully* play WoW. I upped it to 512 since the 1024 is insanely expensive. I have been playing WoW on my Thinkpad T40 (1.6ghz, 1024MB). So perhaps it won't even run as good as it does on the notebook.

    6. Re:WoW Req. by Jearil · · Score: 1

      What was your video card though? I know people who have similar setups as yours on a mac, but with 32 mb of video ram it runs like crap for them.

      Just curious because if someone were able to get WoW running in a playable fashion with a 32mb video card (as this looks not upgradable on the mini-mac), then this would be a nice little machine to start playing around with macs again with for myself.

    7. Re:WoW Req. by astonish · · Score: 1

      Blizzard has already stated that although they haven't gotten a mini in their lab yet, it is the same specs and gfx card as the iBook so with a new stick of ram the game should run acceptably.

    8. Re:WoW Req. by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      My iMac has a GeForce2MX, which is pretty much crap. My PC has a Radeon 9200, which has significantly better output. The only issue is my PC has 4x the dedicated RAM for graphics, so I could imagine the mini looking 1/4 as well, or just as well, but slower, or both the same speed and just as well due to some other factor I'm not considering. I get about 30-60 fps depending on the situation in WoW on my 9200; I don't know how much of that is graphics card, memory, or hard disk. I'm fairly certain CPU isn't really an issue on rendering 3d these days.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
  47. heh by customs · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    so, who's the new slashdot editor? ;)

    1. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      same as the old slashdot editor.

  48. It's ALL about the software, stupid! by simon_hibbs2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All the price comparisons I've seen, including the 'in-depth' analysis on CNet, talk purely about the value of the hardware. (BTW, theirs is bogus, because they compare to boxes with crappy integrated graphics and no DVD player). The attraction of the Mac is in the software, mainly iLife. This is why people buy computers - to do stuff. Of the news site anayses I've seen, most of them don't even mention the bundled iLife software at all, yet it's the core of the digital lifestyle that Apple are selling. This is why comparisons of Windows PCs and Macs are nearly uniformly missing the point. A Mac isn't realy in the same product category as a PC. It's more like the product category of digital cameras, synthesisers and DVD players. Simon Hibbs

    1. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by AVee · · Score: 1

      That, but you can add another point.
      A really good design, may or may not be important, but all mac's look great while most PC's are boring. The few with really good design com3 with an added price as well.

    2. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by SilentChris · · Score: 1, Interesting

      *Scratches head* I wouldn't agree with that at all. In my position "doing stuff" is compiling, email and web. In that case free apps are available on both platforms, and the tools I use (gcc) are also free.

      I have an iBook G4, and personally I've never found a need to use the iLife stuff outside iTunes. For example, what's the point of having iMovie on my machine (which they included) when it doesn't have a DVD writer? To make .mov files? Whatever.

    3. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by esme · · Score: 1
      More than that, my (admittedly unscientific) look at Dell's prices found them to be just as expensive for the same features.

      I went to Dell's webstore, picked the $500 PC link on the home page, and made a few mods to bring the two boxes in line: removed monitor, added firewire, upgraded CD-ROM to DVD-ROM/CD-RW.

      At that point, the machines aren't apples-to-apples -- the Dell box has 512MB RAM and a faster processor. But all the other specs are the same.

      The price was $570 ($520 after a mail-in rebate). And this is for a huge cheesy-black, mini-tower case, not for an aesthetically pleasing, smaller-than-a-shoebox Mac Mini case.

      So I agree with you about the software and the other intangibles. But at least as far as I can tell, the actual prices of the Mac Mini and a chepo Dell machine are basically the same.

      -Esme

    4. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For example, what's the point of having iMovie on my machine (which they included) when it doesn't have a DVD writer? To make .mov files? Whatever.

      to make video cds? or, yeah, .mov files? It's a strange complaint. I'd be more likely to agree with, "what's the point of having iDVD on my machine when it doesn't have a DVD writer?"

      but then, you can always by a Mac with a DVD writer. Or buy an firewire DVD writer. Or whatever.

    5. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iMovie is still good for editing the movie and sending it back out to the DV camera or to a VCR.

      If you need DVD's, just buy a burner. you can also create an iDVD project on a mac without a burner and then transefer to one with a burner.

    6. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi,

      It depends who you are.

      I see it for the regular user, the selling point is as a package: both hardware + software. Ready to start.

      On my iBook, I'm running Gentoo Linux. Before the Centrino chipsets, they were not too many laptops with high-mobility factor.

      Yes, I played with OS X and with the 2 games coming with my iBook. But other than testing my project on OS X for portability, I currently don't use it... I never used the iLife thing other than running iTunes a few times.

    7. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by simon_hibbs2 · · Score: 1

      Well, you can make VCDs. That's quite attractive to me actualy as my wife's half of the family are Chinese and VCD is the standard over there. Not typical I know, but then as a software developer you're not an average Mac user either. A valuable one though, of course. Simon Hibbs

    8. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! It's a media PC you hook up to your TV and stereo to watch movies and play music. Just connect a couple of USB external 400 GB hardrives on this baby and you're set.

      J

    9. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      Does the thing run well on 256 megabytes of RAM, or will it run like Windows XP on 256 megabytes of RAM?

    10. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was the video ram the same? I was considering purchasing a mac mini until I saw the video card only has 32MB of ram. I would be surprised if the Dell came with less that 64MB. I think apple blew it on this one. Its not 1998 put at least 64MB of video ram in the damn thing.

    11. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by yamla · · Score: 1

      OS X is pretty hungry for memory. It'll run with only 256 megs of RAM, but it really thirsts for more.

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    12. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by yamla · · Score: 1

      Note that the Mac mini has craptastic graphics as well. It ships with a 32 meg (!) Radeon 9200. That's basically a DirectX 8 video card (yes, I know OS X doesn't support DirectX). It's what, two generations behind?

      Of course, it is fine for anything none-game related, but then so is the integrated graphics shipping on low-end Dell systems.

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    13. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Almost all DVD players can also play VCDs, so you can even give them to your American family and friends and they will Just Work.

      It's also possible to make a movie on a computer without a DVD burner, then transfer the finished product to one that does have one.

      And yes, some people do make .movs. In fact, Apple positions this as one of the big uses of iMovie and .Mac.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    14. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 1

      Does the thing run well on 256 megabytes of RAM, or will it run like Windows XP on 256 megabytes of RAM?

      I can't comment on Windows XP, having never even used it. I have an iBook G4, which is similar in spec to the Mac Mini (but the Mac Mini has a 50% faster processor). My iBook G4 was usable with 256 MB of RAM, but not exactly fast. When two users were logged in simultaneously, it got slow. I just upgraded the RAM on the machine to 640 MB, which makes a small difference in the single user case, but is obviously faster when two users are logged in at the same time.

      It's probably worth, therefore, upgrading the memory to 512 MB on the Mac Mini if you can afford it, but if you can't afford to, it's not the end of the world.

      Rich.

    15. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an iMac that has the same basic specs (1 Ghz G4, 256MB RAM) and run big apps like Final Cut Pro, DVD Studio Pro, Word, Etc. without any problems. Safari and Mail fly along very happily, too.

      But, if I were buying a mini today, I'd opt for the slower processor but up the RAM to 512MB and HD to 80GB (which would add only $125 total).

      In OS X (as well as XP) the extra RAM makes much bigger impact on overall speed than a faster proc.

    16. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The thing is... Hardware, we must buy. Software, we can pirate.

    17. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that the Mac mini has craptastic graphics as well. It ships with a 32 meg (!) Radeon 9200. That's basically a DirectX 8 video card (yes, I know OS X doesn't support DirectX). It's what, two generations behind?

      Which isn't really going to matter to me as my current machine is a AMD Duron 1.1 GHz with a low-end Geforce2 for a video card.

      I am the kind of person Apple is marketting to. I really want to find out what OS X is all about, but I am too much of a tightwad to buy a Power Mac, and don't like the other offerings that include monitors.

    18. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by JamieF · · Score: 1

      Would it be a better computer if they removed iMovie and iDVD from iLife on systems that didn't include a DVD writer from the factory?

    19. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      This is why people buy computers - to do stuff.

      Actually, the main reason people buy computers these days is to replace their old one, which mysteriously doesn't work as well as it used to. They're seen as a thing that naturally degrades over time : "it's obsolete the minute you buy it" is something I hear a lot, and though there was a time in the late 90s when that was true, it's just not any more, but the perception is still there. This is one of the myths that Apple is combating with the Mac mini.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    20. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah. What's the point of including DVD burning software on a laptop with CD-RW, that you can't replace the drive on?

    21. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't used to ship iDVD with non-SuperDrive Macs. The reason they do now is because iDVD gained the ability to package up a project and move it to another Mac to burn the DVD. So your kid can design a DVD on his iBook upstairs (or at school), and then burn it using your SuperDrive-equipped iMac in the family room. You save $200 (more, in fact, since you can buy a 12" iBook instead of being forced to 14" for the SuperDrive).

      iMovie is a different story. You can output as QuickTime, dub your edited movie back to your camcorder, etc. -- the required hardware is a camcorder, not a DVD drive. So it's always been included.

    22. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case free apps are available on both platforms, and the tools I use (gcc) are also free.

      You can also use email, web and gcc on windows, although you are right with what you are doing, linux and OS X are going to be your best choices.

    23. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2, Informative

      iDVD now supports output to disk image files and third-party DVD burners.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    24. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      It does NOW. It didn't when Apple shipped the iBook.

      Face it: the had a standard image that they didn't want to tinker with. Rather than giving me the *right* image, with software I could actually *use* they included all the other pieces of iLife that just waste space.

    25. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step one: Drag unwanted apps to the trash.

      Step two: Empty trash.

      Step three: There is no step...wait...for you...take learning annex course on computer basics.

    26. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Dell has "onboard Intel video", in other words, it barely does 3D and steals video memory from system RAM. I'd say the Apple's dedicated video chip is a bit better than that.

    27. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by DGregory · · Score: 1

      Well, not quite... My desktop at home is a 600 mhz Athlon running win98 SE. It has no firewire, the hard drive is 30 gb (top o' the line back then), and it doesn't do things as automatically as Win XP (since the OS predates newer hardware). It's too slow to install Win XP on and still be productive. My digital camera crashes the computer when it's plugged into it (i had to get a Compactflash reader instead).

      My nifty new Powerbook laptop has a DVD burner, firewire, and it does things out of the box that my desktop doesn't (good graphics program, good DVD-burning program, etc). it's got wireless built in while my old Compaq laptop (also Win 98) doesn't. The Compaq laptop doesn't even have Ethernet built in, and it weighs twice as much as the Powerbook with the same size screen.

      It's just not only about speed anymore with upgrading to a new computer, it's about functionality.

    28. Re:It's ALL about the software, stupid! by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
      Then don't install them or drag them to trash. This is not windows. There is no registry or anything else to worry about.

      Come on now, this is just a strawman though. How do you know you won't want to use those apps later? HD space is cheap and plentiful these days so your "excuse/complaint" is moot anyway.

      Unlike windows, most apps have zero affect on the system other than taking up some HD space.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  49. And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Who in their right mind buys memory from an OEM? Don't get on Apple's case about expensive memory, because it's true in the PC world too! Whether it's Dell, Sony, IBM, whoever - you're almost always better off dollarwise to buy your system with the least available memory, then buy the upgrade from someone else. With the exception of the occasional special deal, this has been true for as long as I can remember.

    Of course, this begs the question: does the mini allow user upgrades? Can't check because the Apple site isn't responding at the moment, but that little box looks to be shut tighter than a virgin's iPod.

    *-*

    What I see more focus on hardware design, the exact opposite of the clone fiasco. They are getting, and supporting, higher margins on their hardware because of their design engineering. No other MP3 player looks or feels as good as the iPod. The Mini looks looks like another homerun, their first small form factor PC and its uniquely Apple and great looking.

    Apple's focus has shifted to perfecting the Human-Computer interface. This is what it was all about originally. They are focusing on the look and feel of products, both hardware and software.

    Get the details right, and they will come.

    *-*

    The Mac Mini will be a perfect X-Terminal to use with a Linux box in another room. You'll have a silent and small box on your desk and the fat and loud server is down in the basement. Great.

    *-*

    Another thing to note. A DIN slot (car radio standard size) is 2"x7", the mini mac is 2"x6.5".

    If it had a radio faceplate and a laptop drive, this would be the best car stereo ever.

    *-*

    Say hello to *real* "Media Center" Machine

    (1) add a RAM stick BTO - cheapo
    (2) add bluetooth BTO - cheapo
    (3) add Wifi card BTO - cheapo
    (4) sit unobtrusively to my way-cool existing TV and hook up A/V - nothin'
    (5) hook to already existing wifi ADSL-powered network - nothin'
    (6) bring in my already existing Sony-Ericsson Z600 - nothin'
    (7) ...?
    (8) Profit!

    Lemme see what I get from this:

    (A) iTunes playback
    (B) VLC playback
    (C) DVD playback
    (D) UNIX development
    (E) Surf web
    (F) Check mail
    (7) Photo slideshow
    (8) Remote control via Z600 (see 2,6,A,B,C,E)
    All in the living room sitting comfortably on the sofa (see D)! Yay!

    *-*

    INSTRUCTIONS:
    1. Select proper post
    2. Copy and paste into the reply box
    3. Submit (no need for preview!)
    4. Profit

    1. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Kick+the+Donkey · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well... I'd say this would be one case where you'd buy the OEM RAM. The mini-mac's only got one DIMM. So, if you buy the 256MB, then run out and buy a 512MB stick from Crucial, say, you'd be throwing your money away on the 256MB that came with the unit.

      --
      /. is a bunch of nerds at a million typewriters. It's not a political conspiracy determined to undermine your beliefs.
    2. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by gonzo-wireless · · Score: 0

      No way. A stick of 512 costs you about £25. Apple will upgrade for £30. So, if you do the upgrade yourself, it costs £5 less and you get the 256 stick that you can sell on ebay. It just works out cheaper to do it yourself.

      The same is probably true with replacing the drive. It is, after all, just a slim line laptop affair.

    3. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by BlueCodeWarrior · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It also has to do with the fact that OSX is really picky about its RAM...sometimes it won't recognize non-Apple branded RAM very well, or so I've heard.

    4. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by jest3r · · Score: 1

      I just bought a mini with the least amount of ram possibe. Apple wants $500 for a 1GB RAM module .. I am sure I can get 1GB of RAM for half that elsewhere ...

    5. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by CountBrass · · Score: 2, Informative
      There are *no* user servicable parts in a mini Mac: you want to open it up you have to bust the case and void your warranty.

      That includes switching in some more memory.

      Not that it stopped me buying one and speccing it with 512MB: it's not as if it's going to be doing a lot of memory intensive work for me: for that I use my DP G5 :-)

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    6. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      Bad move. Unlike with the iMac and PowerMac you'll probably bust the case getting it open and you'll definately void your warranty: pay the extra $50 and get it with 512MB: if you want a beast of a machine buy a PowerMac not this basic home user machine.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    7. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually if you search the apple support library for mac mini, you'll see that they just say memory "should be installed by an apple service tech" (not verbatim)

      It should be fine to do the memory installation yourself.

    8. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by CrackedButter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Geh the cheap RAM off crucial (not kingston or any other) and take it to a apple authorised reseller. Have them crack open the case and you don't void the warranty and its still cheaper.

    9. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by throughthewire · · Score: 5, Informative
      ...OSX is really picky about its RAM...sometimes it won't recognize non-Apple branded RAM very well, or so I've heard.

      Heard where?

      The RAM I've got in my old G4 began its life in a Dell server. It runs OS X just fine. It ran OS 9 and 8.6 just peachy, too. I have trouble believing that an OS could identify the difference between OEM and 3rd party RAM, or behave any differently.

      Cheap, flaky RAM, on the other hand, can hose a machine no matter what OS you're running.

    10. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by WillWallGuy · · Score: 1

      I thought the same but I'm not so sure you'll be able to do so. They list it in the techspecs on apples website as using DDR SRAM and not DDR SDRAM. I've never seen this type of RAM before so maybe it's just a type or maybe I just don't know what I'm talking about. Guess I'll have to wait until Apple post the service manual for the little bugger.

    11. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by CaptDeuce · · Score: 5, Informative
      There are *no* user servicable parts in a mini Mac: you want to open it up you have to bust the case and void your warranty. That includes switching in some more memory.

      This simply isn't true. I'll let Henry Norr, veteran Mac journalist at http://www.macintouch.com/mwsf2005notebook.html/, tell it like it is:

      Apple "does not recommend" that users upgrade the memory themselves - you're supposed to have a service provider do it if you want to add more after purchase - but doing it yourself does not void the warranty unless you damage something. A booth person told me the memory slot is easily accessible once you get the case open.

      This has been Apple's policy for donkey years.

      --
      "Where's my other sock?" - A. Einstein
    12. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      Interesting, although not what I read. However you'll understand if I don't take Henry Norr's (who??) word for it. Care to link to an Apple page that says that anything is user-servicable?

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    13. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Maserati · · Score: 1

      OP is correct, Apple systems are extremely picky about their RAM. Consequently, cheap DIMMs will often either not be recognized or cause intermittent errors. Viking memory is good, Kingston is better. The issue here is that a lot of chips sold at the lower end of the price range were chips that failed the tests for higher speeds. This often produces a chip that meets the basic standards for a particular spec (barely) but may have some issues performing properly. The reputable manufacturers may sell chips that have failed some tests at a lower point, but they won't have the brand label on them.

      This has been going on with Macs since the early G4 days. I have run into any number of modules with the lower-spec sticker just slapped over the original one.

      Vendor: "the relabelled RAM is fine !"
      Me: " so how many QA tests did it have to fail to get that new sticker ?"

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    14. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      This is explicitly not true. The reason Apple recommends that RAM be installed by an expert is that this computer is small, and consequently it's tricky to get it open and get the RAM in without doing harm.

      Swapping out internal components in the mini does not void your warranty, but if you screw something up in the process of swapping out an internal component, Apple won't fix it under your warranty. See?

    15. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by ahknight · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Ohfortheloveofallthatissane.... you will NOT void the warranty on a Mac by opening it. Hell, the iMac G5 was just designed around the entire concept of the user replacing the freakin' MLB at home rather than getting it serviced.

      The Mac mini is completely user-serviceable. If you want to add your own RAM, do it.

      Freakin' paranoids.

    16. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is true - there was an OS update (one of the 10.1.* series, I think) a few years ago which led to users' RAM mysteriously disappearing. Turns out that the new OS update had imposed a more stringent startup RAM test, and bad-quality generic RAM was failing the new test and "disappearing".

      OS X couldn't tell the difference between Apple-installed RAM and third-party RAM, but it could find RAM which was out of spec for the system and ignore it. If you buy RAM anywhere other than Fred's Computing Chop Shop, you're fine.

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    17. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by StandardDeviant · · Score: 1

      Ah, but getting the case open without damaging anything, that might be the rub. Given the size of the thing, I wouldn't be terribly suprised if it was rather a pain to get open given how tightly it must be designed. Of course, only time will tell (I'll let other people guinea pig that one ;)). It's kind of a moot point for me anyway, as their price for the 512 upgrade isn't that far out of line for what I'd expect a ram stick that size to go for, and nothing I'd be using a mini for would require more than that anyway.

    18. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heard where?

      I have also heard this, many times (net forums, word of mouth and vendors).

      The RAM I've got in my old G4 began its life in a Dell server. It runs OS X just fine. It ran OS 9 and 8.6 just peachy, too. I have trouble believing that an OS could identify the difference between OEM and 3rd party RAM, or behave any differently.

      The difference lies in the latency. CAS 3 SDRAM which worked fine in OS9, prevents OSX from running. I don't know if this always happens, but that is apparently where the trend shows the difference. Supposedly, Apple only provided CAS 2 SDRAM (when SDRAM was the best they could offer).

      I saw posts in newsgroups and forums more than once about this.

      Whether this is a performance issue or detection issue, I don't know. But the specs of a RAM stick can certainly be read by the OS from the little serial EPROM which is typically found on SDRAM and DDR RAM.

      I always seek out high quality RAM and run a 24 hour burn in and I also always take great pains to seek out the lowest latency RAM for Macs because of this issue.

      I actually don't mind because it's good to get the lower latency RAM. A year or two ago, I found that PC100 CAS2 SDRAM was almost as fast (transfer rate) as PC133 CAS3 SDRAM. Making me want PC133 CAS2. ; )

      Cheap, flaky RAM, on the other hand, can hose a machine no matter what OS you're running.

      True, but in this case, it was a very black and white case of OS9 versus OSX cropping up suddenly when people started to upgrade to OSX.

      Open your mind. Just because you have a few little successes, does not mean that your experience reflects that of the norm.

    19. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      However you'll understand if I don't take Henry Norr's (who??) word for it.
      Says some 14-year-old posting on Slashdot under the moniker "CountBrass."

      Only on the internet do you find losers with that kind of chutzpah.

    20. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by DrXym · · Score: 0, Troll
      Besides which, does the Mac Mini's case even open up? The website makes ominous hints about expansions saying "the rest can be added in-store at an Apple Store or an Apple authorized reseller.".

      Which sounds awfully like "we're closing the box with special screws or hidden latches so you can't open it without a special tool". Perhaps I'm being paranoid, but Apple have done it before (as my Mac SE can attest to) and they may well decided to do it again.

    21. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by clontzman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It ain't paranoia, yo. From http://www.apple.com/macmini/ :

      Mac mini offers plenty of juice to power your digital life, but you can kick it into overdrive with extras. Add the SuperDrive option to burn DVDs of your home movies or to make a backup of the music or audiobooks you buy at the iTunes Music Store. You can minimize the desktop clutter of cables with wireless connections. Surf wirelessly with an AirPort Extreme Card installed in your Mac mini. Or configure your Mac mini with internal Bluetooth to use wireless keyboards and mice. You can also choose up to 1GB RAM and increase the 40GB hard drive to 80GB. Some of these options must be installed by Apple at the factory; the rest can be added in-store at an Apple Store or an Apple authorized reseller.

    22. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some of these options must be installed by Apple at the factory; the rest can be added in-store at an Apple Store or an Apple authorized reseller.

      can != must

      Nothing in the blurb you quoted about voiding warrenties.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    23. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      But if you're going to make the qualification, as Apple does. why leave out "or install it yourself with our easy to use diy guide"?

      I don't think the question has been answered. Time will tell.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    24. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by forevermore · · Score: 1
      doing it yourself does not void the warranty unless you damage something

      I've always wondered about this policy of Apple's. If you open the case to install RAM, how do you prove that you didn't touch the hard drive, so you can get it repaired under warranty if it breaks a month later? If you open the case, you don't void the warranty, but if the machine breaks, and you've opened the case, they can pretty easily void your warranty. How is this different from just saying that opening the case voids the warranty?

      --
      Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
    25. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Leadmagnet · · Score: 0, Troll

      How much is it to upgrade the OS to Windows XP sp2?

      --
      http://www.leadmagnet.50megs.com
    26. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only cheaper if your time is worthless.

    27. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by daijo78 · · Score: 2, Funny

      We'll help you unless you get in trouble

    28. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by dhuff · · Score: 1
      can != must

      Indeed. Check out what the folks at the Apple booth told Henry Norr over on the MacInTouch website. Take home message was "doing it yourself does not void the warranty unless you damage something."

    29. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Funny that, since just about any system can ignore bad ram. I had a p2 that refused to recognize a 256 module that worked fine in another, just more of the evil Apple/Intel empire enforcing a certain amount of quality for their products I guess.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    30. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Reglar_Joe · · Score: 1

      I always thought since Apple was going after the less tech savvy user they figured all those who love Macs but can't be bothered with learning about bits and CPUs and stuff would have no interest in upgrading. Besides, it's more income for them to have you drop it off at a reputable dealer. The majority of the Mac users I've spoken with have no desire to insert memory and would probably do it wrong, anyway, and hose the mobo.

    31. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is not Apple's traditional policy.

      To quote the Mac Mini tech specs page:

      5. Memory upgrade must be performed by an Apple Authorized Service provider.

      You won't find this on other Mac models. The iMac, for example, explicitly marks various parts like the RAM and the hard drive as user-serviceable.

      "Easily accessible once you get the case open" is laughable. The original iBook's hard drive was "easily accessible" once you get the case sufficiently open, but getting to that point took an hour and a half, and putting the thing back together took another hour and a half. It's a meaningless statement, and I would like to know how hard it really is to upgrade the RAM.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    32. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      "doing it yourself does not void the warranty unless you damage something."

      So it doesn't void your warranty as long as you never need to repair it under the warranty? Riiight.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    33. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I bought no-name RAM for my PowerBook G4. One DIMM worked, the other didn't. I did an RMA on the dead stick and got a new one in a couple of days that worked just fine. My algorithm for selecting a RAM vender was to pick the cheapest one on ramseeker.com. I have been doing this on Mac systems for years without any real problems (other than the occasional dead stick that has to be returned.)

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    34. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      It's kind of a moot point for me anyway, as their price for the 512 upgrade isn't that far out of line for what I'd expect a ram stick that size to go for

      Except it should cost the difference of a 256 and 512 in price, seeing as if they install the 512, you won't still possess the 256 to sell on eBay or install in another machine.

      Also, BTO units aren't readily returnable.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    35. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's a nice company. They're the "good guys." Honest to God, it sounds stupid, and I know I must sound rather fanboyish, but if you think of the company as a person, he/she has common sense when it comes to product returns, warranties and customer service. I don't think Apple hires assholes.*

      * Steve Jobs excepting.

    36. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Interesting

      What a load of guff.

      Apple THEMSELVES fit Crucial / Micron RAM, so why would fitting it yourself cause any problems? I've been fitting 3rd party RAM to Macs for over a decade now without ever experiencing problems.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    37. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by EvilFrog · · Score: 1

      Actually, this has been Apple's policy for years, and it makes perfect sense.

      I've installed RAM on dozens of Macs over the years, and none of them have ever been refused service.

      On the other hand, I had to work on a Powerbook one time where the owner tried to install RAM himself and broke the piece of plastic that holds the DIMM in place. Because he broke it trying to install a module himself, it wasn't covered under warranty. My answer for him ended up being a single large module to put in the other slot and be more careful next time.

      This is actually a pretty leniant policy, and one I appreciate. They don't want people poking around that don't know what they're doing, but if you know what you're doing there's no reason to pay someone else to do it.

      Compare that to other computer manufacturers such as Dell. I don't know if they still do this, but some old Dells I had to work with actually had a switch that got triggered whenever you opened the case, so when you brought it in to be serviced the technition would be able to tell if you were poking around inside. Not cool- I should at the very least be able to clean out the dust in my PC without voiding the warranty.

    38. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As stated before, here, cracking the case does not void the warranty.

    39. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by AaronStJ · · Score: 1

      Upgrading to 512 megabytes of RAM, you still come out ahead if you'rte willing to buy generic. And if you wanted to upgrade to 1 gigabyte (for which apple charges $425!) you can come in at more than $100 cheaper, buying name brand (stick of Crucial for $299). And if you do the upgrade yourself, you've got a shiny new 256 megabyte stick for free. Don't get my wrong, the Mac Mini is a great deal, but the OEM RAM isn't.

      --
      Stupid like a fox!
    40. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yep. Apple did it before. 20 years ago. I'm pretty sure you don't have anything to worry about.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    41. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by TerryMathews · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't need anything from Apple. The Magnum-Moss warranty act says that for Apple to void the warranty on the basis of non-approved parts, Apple has to prove that the parts used directly contributed to the failure.

      Magnum-Moss was designed for cars, but as I understand it, it is not limited to cars.

      --
      -- Terry
    42. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      It has two dimm slots (at right angles to each other).
      Left side of the DVD and back of the box.
      you can put up to a gig in it.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    43. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Truekaiser · · Score: 1
      Apple's a nice company. They're the "good guys." Honest to God, it sounds stupid, and I know I must sound rather fanboyish, but if you think of the company as a person, he/she has common sense when it comes to product returns, warranties and customer service. I don't think Apple hires assholes.*
      worng. companys are neither good nor evil they are only interested in making money and doing it within one inch of breaking the law.
    44. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We're posting on /., aren't we?

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    45. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I think that may almost be considered trolling :heh:

      My self, I am a Windows and Linux guy. I'm seriously thinking about buying one of these as a simple, small toy. That way I can learn to use Macs.
      My brother has a mac and such, but I don't really know my way around it. This seems like the perfect chance to learn.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    46. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by UWC · · Score: 1

      Crap. That's very discouraging. I was pretty much set on ordering one tonight, until they changed the "Delivered by 1/22/05" to "3-4 weeks" and now I might have to pay $75 for 256MB more RAM. I wonder if CompUSA will have any available on the 22nd. I'd say "Apple Store," but the closest one is a 3 or 4 hour drive from here. Hm.

    47. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you so much for your contribution to the discussion at hand. I will remember this pearl of wisdom forever.

    48. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see a 2nd slot on the back, I see the rear faceplace for all of the ports....

    49. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by bwy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is from a Crucial response on RAM differences between Apple specific RAM & normal, mainstream RAM:
      ---
      CT372707 is specifically for the Apple iBook (G4 1.2GHz) as standard
      parts CT6464X265 can sometimes be incompatible. This is due to a change
      in the JEDEC standards.

      Apples with standard memory will sometimes give the error "Bad memory"
      or "kernal panic". The memory however is not faulty.
      ---
      While that doesn't completely answer the question for me, it does give *some* insight.

    50. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

      Since he is likely to be doing this while he could otherwise be getting paid, it probably is.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    51. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Vista911 · · Score: 1

      Considering that all RAM in 99.9% of all computers is 3rd party anyhow I have to agree...I dont see the OS working better with Apple RAM which isnt infact actually manufactured by Apple anyhow but rather Samsung or Hyundai or the likes.

    52. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by bwy · · Score: 1

      I'm double posting this just because someone should see it and mod you up, because you are 100% correct even though you didn't have a source to cite. This is from a Crucial response on RAM differences between Apple specific RAM & normal, mainstream RAM: --- CT372707 is specifically for the Apple iBook (G4 1.2GHz) as standard parts CT6464X265 can sometimes be incompatible. This is due to a change in the JEDEC standards. Apples with standard memory will sometimes give the error "Bad memory" or "kernal panic". The memory however is not faulty. ---

    53. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by DrXym · · Score: 1
      They've done it more recently than that - the iPod is sealed too. Hence why sites have sprung up just documenting how to open the bloody thing to change the battery without sending it off for servicing.


      But I'll let the early adopters find out the story with this Mac first. My guess is either the unit is sealed (as in it can only opened with a special tool) or they cover / hide the screws with warranty stickers and pads.


      I do like the concept of the Mac Mini, but as I have a G4 already, I think I'll hang on for the next generation which will no doubt improve on these specs somewhat.

    54. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So what's the big deal?

      Get ECC type RAM, froma trusted manufacturer, and your set.

      Like many other obscure topics, DJBernstein complains about ECC RAM, and has a rant page about it at http://cr.yp.to/hardware/ecc.html

    55. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but consider that its 1G price is about four hundred buck more than its 256M price. In that case, I'd get it, get a 1G chip for $170, and save the OEM RAM for my mini ITX board, which has two slots.

    56. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1
      No it means if I dont try to remove the old ram with a hammer I am golden...

      If while replaceing the ram I smash the processor, I am not covered.. But if I replace the ram and later the processor goes again I am golden..

      --
    57. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint: Don't EVER buy ram marked as ???x4 or "High Density".

      It almost never works right; it's just a cheap way to put together memory that "should" work, but, in fact, does not.

    58. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      Somebody mod this funny! great post..

      --
    59. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has included the same blurb with many other products in the "Second Jobs Age," and they have always handled the warrenty the same way: As long as you didn't obviously screw it up yourself while doing the mod, they still cover it.

      Why don't they encourage you to install it yourself? Because 90% of their customers don't know what they are doing and would probably screw it up, and then try to get it fixed under warrenty anyway. That's why.

      If you know how to install memory, it's not even an issue with them, and never has been.

      Stop spreading FUD.

    60. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I don't see a 2nd slot on the back, I see the rear faceplace for all of the ports....

      look at an exploded view. My brother and I were looking at it last night. I'll try and fine the page . . .

      O.K. looks like I may be eating crow.

      We were looking at this image:

      http://images.apple.com/macmini/images/designinsid es20050111.jpg

      and it was late, we wanted to believe, etc...

      guess that explaines the high price for 1Gig of ram.

      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    61. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Big deal, you had to buy an extra long screwdriver to get the SE open. They are easily obtainable from Sears.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    62. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      Apple wants $75 to upgrade to 512MB. You can get 512MB for around $50 bucks or so on-line. Most people who get this Mac Mini will probably have another system. They can get 512MB for about $50 and use the 256MB that came with the Mac Mini in their other system. At least this is what I am planning on doing. My other system (running Linux/WinXP) has 512MB of 333MHz DDR memory and I can stick that extra Mac Mini 256MB in it. So for only $50, I can turn my Mac Mini into a _very_ nice little system.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    63. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Never had any trouble with stuff from datamem.com. I've thrown their stuff in Macs from the old 30 pin days up to my new XServe.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    64. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      But if you look at the pictures of the inside of the Mac mini, you'll notice it's held together with lots of those fiddly plasic clips that are almost impossible to get open all at once without breaking a few, unless you have a custom made jig to crack it open. This might be openable by the consumer without breaking it, and therefore your voiding warranty, but it might not. The jury is still out.

    65. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      How in the world did you come up with that? Do you think Dell would honor my warranty if I tried to do something myself and had no clue what I was doing? Nope, Dell would tell me tough luck.

      If I tried to put memory into my new Dell and _forced_ the DIMM in the wrong way, I am sure Dell would say take a hike. What Apple is doing is no different. They are saying that if you _don't_ know what you are doing, take it into a service center. I doubt Dell would send me a new Mobo if I poured water on it to "cool" the processor.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    66. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by keytoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly - Mac OS X isn't picky about any particular brand, it's just picky about shitty RAM.

      I think I prefer my system to actually check (you know, in that POST portion of boot where it's supposed to check the RAM) that the RAM is at least reasonably sound and bail immediately than to just merrily chug along with a bad stick and bomb out later at a random time.

    67. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Yeah it is a big deal. I'm sure tools do become available over time, but a deeply recessed screw with a non-standard head is a bitch to remove especially if you don't have the luxury of being on the same continent as a Sears.

    68. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by zev1983 · · Score: 1

      Look at all the clips on that thing, it's going to take hours of careful work to get that open without breaking anything inside.

      I bet the authorized service centers have a little thing they can just push the Mac Mini down onto that pops it open in 3 seconds...

      Damn their RAM prices, damn them...

    69. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by throughthewire · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The difference lies in the latency. CAS 3 SDRAM which worked fine in OS9, prevents OSX from running. I don't know if this always happens, but that is apparently where the trend shows the difference.

      Sure, and ArsSineArtificio has already pointed out that OS X increased the strigency of its memory checking. I didn't say that I doubted an OS could detect out-of-spec RAM; I said I doubted it could detect third party RAM. I still doubt it. You're not really disagreeing with me, anyway.

      Open your mind. Just because you have a few little successes, does not mean that your experience reflects that of the norm.

      Spare me. I've been supporting Macs since 1985. I bother to do things like check the specifications before I install memory. My experience simply doesn't reflect that of those who install any old RAM that fits in the slot, and then wonder why they experience mysterious problems.

      Open your mind to the idea that other people might be competent.

    70. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by mr_zorg · · Score: 1
      Well... I'd say this would be one case where you'd buy the OEM RAM. The mini-mac's only got one DIMM. So, if you buy the 256MB, then run out and buy a 512MB stick from Crucial, say, you'd be throwing your money away on the 256MB that came with the unit.
      Granted, but if you consider that it costs over $400 to upgrade the OEM RAM to 1GB, vs. $150 or so if you buy it yourself, you're still saving enough money to make it worth throwing your money away...
    71. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      nope your wrong on this one (and only this one) it does.

      But regardless you can bring the memory to a AOR and get them to do it so who cares.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    72. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by krel · · Score: 1

      Don't bring up the original iBook. That thing was built like a tank. The only user-servicable parts on that machine were memory and Airport cards, Apple didn't recommend users replacing the hard drive. I have a headless, caseless, keyboard and trackpad-less first gen ibook with a thirty gig drive running as a server now because i couldn't put the case back together after replacing the hard drive.

      --
      karma: ouch!
    73. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mitch Hedberg rocks!

    74. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      The Mac Mini will be a perfect X-Terminal to use with a Linux box in another room. You'll have a silent and small box on your desk and the fat and loud server is down in the basement. Great.

      I guess Slashdot really isn't the place to be asking this, but can this be done with OS X by itself or is an additional application necessary (similar to some of the Windows applications such as Xwin32)? I'm not familiar with OS X too much, but can you simply telnet from the mini into your linux box then do a setenv DISPLAY macmini?

    75. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by generic-man · · Score: 1

      You need to install the Developer Tools from the CDs that come with the system. Once you're running Mac OS X's own X11 server (included with the Dev Tools) you can just run ssh -X other-computer and use X forwarding.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    76. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by slantyyz · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that we can speculate on the difficulty of cracking open a Mac Mini until someone actually gets their hands on one of these babies, dissects it and then posts the gory details online.

      If, for example, the white top of the MacMini comes off as part of the unscrewing of the unit, unlatching those hooks won't be too much of an issue, since you would then be able to easily unhook them from above.

      While I'm sure Apple doesn't want us poking around in one of these Macs, it is inevitable that more than a few will break down (i.e., hd, optical) and will require service. The more time it takes an Apple tech to crack open a case, the more $ it costs Apple for the warranty work.

    77. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that that's complete bullshit, right? Making money is irrelevant to a public corporation. Keeping shareholders happy is all that matters.

      Blame the shareholding public, not the corps.

    78. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does sound fanboyish, so I'll rephrase it for you. Apple focuses on customer service as a way of differentiating themselves from standard PC OEM's. They're willing to put up with the occasional joker that gives his RAM a static shock, because giving people the benefit of the doubt means more repeat business and the ability to charge higher prices for higher margins over the long run.

    79. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by damiam · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't void the warrenty as long as you don't screw something up while replacing the RAM.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    80. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by damiam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      $210.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    81. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It probably had to do with pairing of chips on the stick. Intel chipsets were notorious for that.

    82. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 1

      Yep, sorry. Nothing is user-servicable... it's too damned small to be modular enough.

      --
      --Matthew
    83. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the AC is correct. Opening the Mac mini case does not void the warranty. Period.

    84. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by hedge_death_shootout · · Score: 1

      can != must

      in-store at an Apple Store or an Apple authorized reseller != at home by yourself.

    85. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the fact that you can buy a 512 stick of ram from crucial for LESS than the price of the upgrade to 512 on the Apple Store. Just keep the 256MB DIMM for use in a computer with more than one slot. :)

    86. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Did you get the urge to disassemble a Mac SE while visiting Antartica or something? Those type heads started showing up in cars before Apple ever started using them. Would it have been nice if they would used a Phillips or slotted head screws? Yes, but it's not like they were using something that only Apple employees had access to.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    87. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by jest3r · · Score: 1

      not at all .. installing a new battery in an iPod is easy .. as is replacing the HD in a Powerbook .. according to apple neither of these items are user installable ... if apple can do it so can i.

    88. Re:And here are the more interesting posts: by Golias · · Score: 1
      can != must


      in-store at an Apple Store or an Apple authorized reseller != at home by yourself.


      Right and you can (not "must) have memory installed at an Apple authorized reseller.

      Nothing whatsoever said about the warranty being voided by opening it yourself, because it's not. Official Apple reps have confirmed as much, why are you trying to pretend this is still even an issue?
      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  50. and how about that logo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, the logo/icon next to the story is G5? Sigh. If only it were true.......

  51. Thank you, samzenpus! by dukethug · · Score: 1

    I have been part of a sensory deprivation experiment for the past four months, and was unaware of the rumors about this so-called "mac mini." I like that slashdot is filling the important niche of news outlets that are looking out for those of us in the sensory deprivation and/or cave dwelling community.

    Come to think of it, weren't you in the sensory deprivation experiment with me?

  52. Re:Steve Jobs does it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cobblers !

  53. The news is by terminal.dk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That the machine has sold very well, and that the shipping date for new orders are no longer Jan 22nd, but 3-4 weeks.

    Luckily, my order got through early, so mine is expected to ship Jan 28th or earlier. This is pretty good since official release in Denmark is 29th.

    1. Re:The news is by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      Has Apple given any statistics on how many have sold since they were
      announced?

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    2. Re:The news is by cowscows · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. They'll probably wait until the post-convention hype has died down a little bit more, then release some big numbers to get their new computer in the news again. I'd also expect seperate announcements for the ipod shuffle, so that each product can get its own set of media mentions.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

  54. But I want my Mac Mini to include... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ... a floppy drive, you insensitive clod!

    Er, wait. The last time I used a Mac, you had to pry out a floppy with a paper clip when it froze, due to the lack of a physical eject button.

    *ducks*
    *runs*
    *trips over box of single button mice*
    *gets up and runs more*

    It does look cool, I'll admit.

    1. Re:But I want my Mac Mini to include... by chrome · · Score: 1

      You can also hold down the mouse button as you power on to eject it if the OS doesn't see the disk as inserted already.

      Ah, I'm a veritable storehouse of useless information.

  55. Just Announced!!!!!! by mikepaktinat · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The rumors of AMD releasing a 64-bit CPU are confirmed. The AMD Athlon(TM) 64 can be found at AMD's website. As expected, it has backwards 32-bit comapatibility. You can order one today; estimate 3-4 weeks shipping date. Base unit starts at $699.

    1. Re:Just Announced!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? 64-bit AMD CPUs have been out for a while, and AMD doesn't sell computers.

      If someone is selling mobile chips in a mini-ATX box, I'm interested; otherwise, not.

  56. Too much by duncangough · · Score: 1

    There must have been a bit too much iShuffling going on back there for them to notice ;-)

  57. In an attempt to put some news into this story... by Andy_R · · Score: 1

    Things I want to know before I decide to buy one of these - does anyone have answers?

    1) Is it fanless?
    2) Are the 'dealer fit only' options (ram, bluetooth, airport) actually difficult to fit yourself?
    3) What's things thing's performance like when used as a Logic Audio Node?
    4) Any reports from people using the Belkin KVM switcher that Apple is selling?

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  58. old news -- this would be a better story today by jeffehobbs · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/13/apple_brea ks_hymn/

    Apple's latest iTunes update, which takes the jukebox software to version 4.7.1, breaks the anti-DRM utility Hymn, it has emerged. ...

    Hymn strips away the DRM rights management data, space for which is incorporated into the AAC audio format Apple uses for ITMS. Apple also uses other elements within the file structure to identify protected AAC tracks, and it's one or more of these that appears to have been added to iTunes 4.7.1's list of checks.


    ~jeff

  59. Oh, my by ceeam · · Score: 1

    I don't know whether to laugh or to cry. Who the heck "samzenpus" is? (Yes, it is redundant, what else do you expect in this thread?)

    PS: Uhm, and it's not quite the "PC". I mean - it does windows but it does not Windows...

    1. Re:Oh, my by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new samzenpus overlord.

    2. Re:Oh, my by nsayer · · Score: 1
      it does windows but it does not Windows...

      Au contraire. Now, I'm not sure I'd actually try it on a mini, but it is at least possible.

  60. perfect match for my Sparc IPC box... by esarjeant · · Score: 1

    Seems like Apple might have borrowed one from the Sun playbook:

    Sun IPX Workstation

    Anyone else remember the boxy little IPC/IPX boxes from Sun? They were a stacking nightmare with the limited space inside, but if you could navigate the labyrinth of SCSI cables things were quite usable.

    --

    Eric Sarjeant
    eric[@]sarjeant.com

    1. Re:perfect match for my Sparc IPC box... by jabella · · Score: 1

      i had a sparc LX that I used for a few years in college in my dorm. it ran RedHat 4.0 back when Dave Miller was doing a LOT of the initial sparc porting at Rutgers.

      it was a fun little box. i had an external cdrom, and an external 400mb drive. we thought it was hot stuff! some of my earliest posts on usenet are from 1995 about that system.

    2. Re:perfect match for my Sparc IPC box... by bhima · · Score: 1

      Actually I was reminded of the SPARCplug

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    3. Re:perfect match for my Sparc IPC box... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One difference.. My IPX has an internal power supply. The Mac Mini does not.

  61. But... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

    Does it run Linux?

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:But... by chrome · · Score: 1

      I'll let you know when I pick one up. I hope they make it to Tokyo by the end of the month ..

  62. WTF by stang7423 · · Score: 1

    This is the worst Dupe I have ever seen...

    I mean come on. The keynote was two days ago. It was reported on slashdot both before and after it was announced, and it has been on every other website on the planet, not to mention on all of the early morning news programs, evening news, and on the back of my milk carton this morning. Is anyone reading over this stuff anymore

    1. Re:WTF by FeloniousPunk · · Score: 1

      You know, after already reading about a hundred "it's a dupe" responses, I'm damn glad you chimed in with "it's a dupe." People might not have noticed the story was a dupe, otherwise.

      --
      I know this because Tyler knows this.
    2. Re:WTF by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Unforunately your comment

      "This is a dupe"

      has been rejected as it is a dupe.

    3. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too !

  63. Re:Flamebait by northcat · · Score: 1

    No dude, if it's an Apple story it has to be reported at least a million times and hyped up till we crap in our pants out of sheer glee.

  64. This just in! by Lurker+McLurker · · Score: 4, Funny
    Darth Vader is Luke Skywalker's father.

    When asked for a comment Mr Vader said "I find your lack of faith disturbing".

    --
    Mod parent up!
  65. bitch all you want, would a headless Dell have... by museumpeace · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From TFA:
    Perfect for Programmers Set a space-saving Mac mini atop your workstation PC and add a KVM switch to share keyboard, monitor and mouse. Mac OS X includes free developer tools for Mac, UNIX and Java. Test out a Mac version of your latest creation, instantly. Pretty soon you'll be using the Mac full-time, with that PC relegated to the testbed.

    I have always been a sucker for the coolness factor in Apple products [but I didn't buy a Lisa!] and this has me drooling.
    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  66. Media Center software? by costas · · Score: 1

    The story is a dupe, but there's a question that stayed unanswered in the original: besides MythTV frontend, is there any media-center software for the Mac? i.e. anything along the lines of mediaportal or XBMC or MyHTPC?

  67. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 2, Informative

    These people are insane. They are including VAT in their 'calculated' prices... Get with it.

  68. Reasoning for the mini by magicsloth · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I love all the posts saying "This isn't a good deal." or "Dell did this last year." etc. That is missing the point. I think the Mac mini is kinda a crappy machine for a few reasons, but I also think that it will sell like hotcakes to the iPod users and people new to digital photography/video that Apple is targeting. From the website http://www.apple.com/macmini/ it seems obvious to me that they are targeting PC users who just got an iPod from a few things.

    1) From the first paragraph on that page:
    And yes, Mac mini will take advantage of your two-button USB mouse with scroll-wheel and your favorite USB keyboard. Just plug them in.


    2) From the second paragraph:
    Manage your music for iPod or organize and share your digital pictures with ease.


    For the average /. reader these things probably aren't that nice (especially since they probably won't be easily user serviceable). To your 50 year old father who wants to edit some pictures he takes with iPhoto and listen to Jimmy Buffet on his iPod (maybe this is just my dad) this might be a nice machine.
    1. Re:Reasoning for the mini by kristeh1337 · · Score: 1

      Well that is the whole point, it's supposed to be an affordable alternative to the PC for your average user who is getting fed up with having to install extra programs just to make sure that its computer doesn't try and eat itself due to spyware and the like. It's just a pity that they will get to use the incredibly sexy Tiger, while we x86'ers don't :(

    2. Re:Reasoning for the mini by cowscows · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Are you kidding, this is the best thing to ever happen to us techies! All I need to do is get my mom and my grandparents to replaces their piece of crap, cheap-ass gateways/dells; and all of a sudden, my family tech support responsibilities will drop by ridiculous amount.

      With all the new free time I'll have, I'll need a new hobby. Maybe I'll finally start drinking.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    3. Re:Reasoning for the mini by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Well, I thought the Slashdot crowd wasn't of the "No user serviceable parts inside? Mommy, this thing scares me!" type.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    4. Re:Reasoning for the mini by caldroun · · Score: 3, Funny

      I started drinking for the reason that you mentioned.

      --
      "If you have done 6 impossible things this morning, why not round it off with breakfast at Milliways" -- hhgg
    5. Re:Reasoning for the mini by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

      The iMac looks like a 3-pronged attack:

      1) Cheap good mac for computer labs. Existing monitors and peripherals work with it, which really adds up.

      2) Switcher bait. On their website they suggest getting one of those boxes that lets you share your peripherals between two machines. The idea being a side-by-side comparison of the two architectures. Pretty bold.

      3) The "Extra" computer. Low cost makes it easy to buy. Very small size makes it easy to use and carry anywhere. Something for the kids or the wife. Potentially, Xgrid-using mac apps could easily leverage the processing power of this machine or other macs on the network, making your home network much more powerful also. Easy networking helps also.

      4) Media center trojan. So you decide to upgrade to latest and greatest, what do you do with your still functional mac mini? With a few minor adaptors and a remote these could potentially be rather capable media centers. They already support analog video, and don't most new HDTVs have firewire? A hard drive upgrade and a superdrive could make for a formidable machine.

      --

      ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    6. Re:Reasoning for the mini by velkro · · Score: 1


      Bingo! I've already ordered 2, one for me, one for my Mom. No more de-spyware/worm/virus-ing the PC once a month, and the added bonus of preventing my niece who is over once a month from installing her Disney games that never uninstall completely, and leave bits of cute-but-annoying crap everywhere.

      If it works for my Mom, I'm going to do my grandparents next.

    7. Re:Reasoning for the mini by Dragoon412 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's more than just your 50 year-old father.

      I'm a 24 year-old network admin that's tired of dealing with Windows falling apart, or having to beat my Linux box into submission to make it do what I want.

      I've used OSX before, briefly, before; the university was covered in iMacs. But only to print papers, or check a website. Then, just after Christmas, I was house sitting for my sister, a technophobe that manages to use an older G4 iMac. Having a week to sit down with the OS, my reaction now is this:

      I'm not running any sort of heavy duty server, so fucking forget dealing with Linux. And if I'm going to pay for an OS, OSX runs rings around the best things Microsoft could even conceive. Now, how can I justify buying a full-priced Mac when I already have a pretty uber gaming PC?

      This announcement couldn't have been more perfectly timed. I adore my iPod. I'm tired of PCs. And this thing's affordable and works with the pretty pricey monitor I've already got.

      If they had an option to upgrade the video card in this thing to something like a 9600/9800 Pro, I'd be absolutely sold, but as it is, I'll probably buy one, anyways.

    8. Re:Reasoning for the mini by bzzzt · · Score: 1

      You must be new here...

    9. Re:Reasoning for the mini by blackmonday · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You say the Mac mini is "kinda a crappy machine" but you give no reasons for it, so I'm gonna help you out. I currently have a Powerbook 867 with a 40 GB hard drive. I use the powerbook to edit video, record multitrack audio, make DVDs with DVD Studio Pro, etc.

      Now, this Mac mini has a processor almost twice as fast, double the hard disk space, and DDR memory (my laptop uses SDRAM)... for 500 bucks. I would hardly call it a crappy machine. Your post makes no sense to me, but obviously a few people find you insightful.

    10. Re:Reasoning for the mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are lots of lame computer n00bs who get a wintel machine, b/c that's what they have at work, and take it home and cock it up, and then bother some tech savy friend about their messed up computer.

      If you give these people macs, they'll find ways to screw them up as well. The OS/hardware has something to do with it, but I'll wager that the user and the mal-ware targetting crosshairs (which will follow the users) are the source of the lion's share of computer screwups.

      Don't underestimate the computer ignorancia - they can screw up anything.

    11. Re:Reasoning for the mini by sysadmn · · Score: 3, Funny

      You must not be doing much tech support for relatives if you're not already drinking.

      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    12. Re:Reasoning for the mini by Averron · · Score: 1

      I work at an elementary school in Florida -- this is a godsend. I've been trying to keep Windows usage to a minimum, using flash based distros to create web terminals that can go to educational websites, but still a good amount of windows machines are needed to run kids programs.

      Now when we need new computers, I can just get mini Macs -- the whole Knowledge Adventure Jumpstart series is available for OSX. Its cheaper than the eMac, and I can hook it up to the existing equipment (minus the PS2 keyboards of course, but I can get those off of ebay for 12 bucks).

      Also, I hear that these things are very quiet and generally don't use their fans. Quiet is good, because no one needs noisy machines whirring in the background when you're trying to read a book to the class, and no fan is good because of DUST. Good lord kids are just giant dust factories.

    13. Re:Reasoning for the mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck it, then! let's just stop making computers!

    14. Re:Reasoning for the mini by RandomJoe · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I qualify for "average /. reader", but I for one have already placed an order for one of these. I have two servers, two laptops, and a desktop all running Linux, but what I wanted most was a very quiet, low power computer that could sit in the corner always on and ready. (Preferably with a sleep mode it would wake from instantly.) I also wanted to play with OSX, but wasn't quite ready to shell for a laptop and didn't want Yet Another monitor. Thus the mini fits my needs perfectly. I was rather shocked at the prices for the add-ons. That is definitely where they get you, especially for the 1GB RAM!

    15. Re:Reasoning for the mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both sets of parents (mine and hers) have PCs and both are smart enough not to totally screw them up. But both get totally infested with spyware and like everyone else here I have to spend half an hour making their system usable again whenever I visit. They won't screw up a Mac. This will be great. I can't wait!

    16. Re:Reasoning for the mini by astrodawg · · Score: 1

      This past weekend, i edited a bunch of video in iMovie on my mothers G3 600mhz ibook. I was really surprised at how well it did. Before I started, I was convinced that I would have to take it home and edit it on my own computer.

      The ibook wasn't even slow. Not only did I not need a more powerful computer, I didn't even find myself wanting one at the time. I wasn't just limping through it.

    17. Re:Reasoning for the mini by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      I'm not running any sort of heavy duty server, so fucking forget dealing with Linux.

      Umm, these days Linux runs on watches, PVRs, routers, desktops, toasters, and, yes, servers too.

      It's also pretty easy to use, if you use the right distro.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    18. Re:Reasoning for the mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If it works for my Mom, I'm going to do my grandparents next."

      Yeah, I worked for her, she fucking loved it in the arse.

      But don't waste your time on the grandparents, you're grandpa's a dud root.

    19. Re:Reasoning for the mini by ca1v1n · · Score: 1

      Given that I, my brother, and my father (whoever is available) all provide tech support for my Grandmother, I think she's getting one of these from the family for Christmas next year.

    20. Re:Reasoning for the mini by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

      Remove a piece of spyware, take a shot.
      Install a Microsoft security patch, take a shot.

    21. Re:Reasoning for the mini by gswallow · · Score: 1

      "or having to beat my Linux box into submission to make it do what I want."

      A-fucking-men.

      I've been beating on Linux for the same reasons for nine years now and while I understand everything that's going on, I no longer care!

      I've had to run a *specific* version of SANE (no upgrades!) to get my scanner to work, or compile XFree86 out of CVS just to get my 3D accelerator to work. Oops -- I didn't wait until *five* years after everyone else could enjoy quick graphics, I only waited three.

      What about that wireless card? Or when the Linux team decided to take dbecker's stable eepro100 driver out of the kernel tree and replace it with crap?

      I'll be buying my Mac mini this year for that exact reason -- long gone are the days that I feel like tweaking just so I can pop up a coherent terminal.

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "nice doggy" until you can find a rock.
    22. Re:Reasoning for the mini by magicsloth · · Score: 1

      I guess I should explain (I know, I'm late with this).

      I have a dual processor G5 on my desk at work, and a pretty kick butt gaming computer at home. Comparatively, the mini is kinda crappy.

      If you have a 3 year old HP or something it will be a nice upgrade though. My comment was from a gaming point of view which I didn't make clear.

  69. Yes there is something new today.. by krunchyfrog · · Score: 0

    Apple updated their french version of apple.ca to show the new mini.

    --
    printf($randomline(sigs.txt) \n "-- "$randomline(authors.txt));
    -- myself
  70. Would make a nice Amiga OS4 box! by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of course, that's assuming that Amiga gets over their "Our OS can only be ran on our hardware" mentality.

    I've been a vocal critic of Amiga for going this route, ever since it was announced, but here's yet another example of why their plan is dumb: You can now buy a complete PPC machine (sans mouse, keyboard, and monitor) for less than you can buy an Amiga OS 4 board!

    Yes... They'd have to get their OS to boot on the machines, but as a growing number of Linux distributions prove, it's not too hard to do.

    I think, after seeing this machines price, and the price of the (yet unreleased, other than in alpha/beta form) Amiga board/CPU combo, that there must only be one or two nails left before the Amigas coffin is finally sealed shut.

    1. Re:Would make a nice Amiga OS4 box! by DrWhizBang · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...there must only be one or two nails left before the Amigas coffin is finally sealed shut.

      Dude, the Amiga has already been buried at sea. And the slashdot editors were there to deliver the eulogy - twice.

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
    2. Re:Would make a nice Amiga OS4 box! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      amiga is still around? Didn't they make computers a long time ago? Who still uses one besides the people who can't get enough of those old amiga games? And how is apple the nail in their coffin? If it is, then amiga is definitely buried alive considering the powerbook and the ipod are probably the two most ubiquitous electronic devices on campus. Can walk around the academic side without seeing two or three at a time.

    3. Re:Would make a nice Amiga OS4 box! by compactable · · Score: 1

      ... even Netcraft confirmed this ...

    4. Re:Would make a nice Amiga OS4 box! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Whilst I'd love to see AmigaOS on open hardware.. consider, did Macs being more expensive than PCs ever stop Macs being profitable or worthwhile?

      The Mac Mini may be something that prevents anything like the Amiga becoming mainstream anytime soon, but last time I looked cheap PCs have been around for years, and we knew that this wasn't going to happen anyway.

      Also on an Amiga related note, don't forget the Pegasos, which appears to be cheaper.

      And it may only be a motherboard, but the Mac Mini components appear to be low end parts that can be found dirt cheap, and so adding these wouldn't add that much.

  71. Bodes well for Tiger-candy on iBook? by BikeRacer · · Score: 1

    Look, I got an iBook partly for the OSX eye candy. I assume the Mac mini has a similar GPU -- they're both ATI 9200, although I have no idea if the mobility moniker on mine makes it inferior. Does this mean Apple might make the Tiger-uber-candy available for all of us GPU-challenged mac owners?

    1. Re:Bodes well for Tiger-candy on iBook? by WombatControl · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tiger's Core Image system is what provides that eye candy. Sadly, Core Image requires a much better GPU than the 9200.

      That isn't to say that Tiger won't run on a Mac mini or an iBook - it most certainly will. You just won't get all the nifty eye candy. And really, other than the temporary "wow" factor, you can do everything you need to do without a bunch of superfluous effects.

      Tiger will run an an iBook or a Mac mini, just without all the extra gewgaws. And believe me, with Dashboard, enhanced search, and the way Apple OS upgrades generally get faster with each release, even without CI it would probably be a worthwhile upgrade.

    2. Re:Bodes well for Tiger-candy on iBook? by rusty_rusty_rusty · · Score: 1

      Tiger's Core Image system is what provides that eye candy. Sadly, Core Image requires a much better GPU than the 9200.

      Maybe true, but not necessarily. The specific GPU requirements for CoreImage as posted on Apple's Tiger preview pages were curiously removed at some point before the Keynote took place.

    3. Re:Bodes well for Tiger-candy on iBook? by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      You have this confused. It is Quartz Extreme that provides the eye candy (if you mean the animations on the desktop). This is simply Apple's reality distortion field-warped version of OpenGL. Quartz Exreme requires a card with hardware OpenGL support, as well as a special driver. The drivers are available for all new Macs, but not for some older ones and some 3rd party cards. The Radeon 9200 is certainly fast enough to run Quartz, comes from a major manufacturer, and is the default card on an Apple system. You can bet that this supports Quartz Extreme. At school, I use 700Mhz eMacs running Panther. They run QE just fine, even with their gForce2 MX graphics and 256 MB of RAM (in fact QE is about the only thing that runs smoothly on these machines, they are in dire need of a RAM upgrade). Remember, although this machine is low end now, about a year and a half ago, a G4 tower with a single 1.25 GHz processor and a Radeon 9200 was going for well over $2000.

  72. Speed of HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple has not disclosed the RPM numbers of the included HD. What is it? 4200 RPM will make it really sluggish.

    TheRealMikael

  73. build to order is expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How user-upgradable is box going to be? You can find 1GB memory for under $200, but Apple wants $425 ?!?!

  74. Re:Samzenpus? Slashdot hacked? by DenDave · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    dunno but I see meta moderation yet when I click it doesn't work so I fear Fear FEAR something is amock!!! MALDA GET YOUR BUMSICKLE OVER HERE!!!!

    --
    -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
  75. Slashdot sued by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just in: Slashdot sued by Apple.

    Apple said "We believe that Slashdot solicited information about released Apple products from individuals, who violated their confidentiality agreements with Apple by providing details that were posted on the Internet."

  76. This isn't news. What would be news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is if someone released something similar based on x86.

    Now though I developed into an Apple hater lately I have to admit that the mini mac looks like a great product, the only problem is, I'd like to have something similar to run linux on.

    And before somebody kills me, I know that you can run linux on ppc, I'm even running gentoo on my ibook, the problem is though that you constantly feel that you are a minority within a minority which translates to no ati and nvidia drivers for example.

    So where's the x86 alternative, me wants one, now.

  77. Re:In an attempt to put some news into this story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) no, but the only fan is on the graphics card and only comes on with heavy graphics use - ie 3d games, etc
    2) RAM is easy, bluetooth and Airport will be very tricky
    3)dunno,
    4)Dunno, but a kvm's a kvm

  78. Serious question: who will buy this? by wild_berry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This isn't intended to be flamebait or a troll (sorry if you thought so): I can't imagine this device finding a market niche as a personal computer. Here's why:

    I was thinking about buying myself a second hand G4 Cube from ebay, but thought better of it when I heard about this (because it's an up-to-date design that is comparable in size to the Cube).

    Then I realised that it's not a hugely powerful machine and is intended perhaps as a second-machine for the iPod users who are inerested in OS X. But it's not really got enough meat to it to compare with its PC contemporaries (and I wouldn't make the mistake of comparing its 1.42 and 1.25GHz G4 chips with a Pentium 4 at 2.8, 3.2, 3.4 etc. GHz), and its G4 chip already looks outdated next to its G5 PowerMac brothers. I understand that the PowerBooks and iBooks contain G4 chips at present, and it appears to me that this Mac mini might be a laptop-derived design. I think it may end up lumped in the 'great for e-mail and web' trough. I expect people will find ways to turn these pretty boxes into PVRs (hacking a video-in) or expensive STBs, silent home servers and the like, but will not use them for second computers.

    I don't want to spark a Mac-antiMac flame war, but do think that these questions remain outstanding. Please honour my non-troll intentions by replying...

    1. Re:Serious question: who will buy this? by kristeh1337 · · Score: 1

      NEWSFLASH! Most users only need a machine for web, email, music, video and photos. With the odd bit of word processing thrown in maybe.

    2. Re:Serious question: who will buy this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there is a huge market for the mac mini.

      What do most people want from computers? They just want something that works so that they can write something, browse the web, play around with their digicam, whatever. And that's exactly what the mac mini is giving them, without any hassle, with an OS that let's them work without getting viruses, etc. and with a lot of useful programs (iLife).

      And let's not forget, it looks good, so there is the design appeal and it's small and unobtrusive. (Believe me, that's exactly the kind of computer my mother would like to have in her house, not one of those ugly x86 towers.)

      Think of the mac mini as the thing for PCs that the ipod was for mp3 players. While there might be other players that were technical superior, the ipod looked good, was easy to use and definately had a lifestyle appeal to it.

    3. Re:Serious question: who will buy this? by bhima · · Score: 2, Insightful
      All of those people who read their e-mail, surf the web, and send pictures of their kids (or grandkids) to friends and family, and play solitaire and other low power games. Or more specifically people that don't read /. and they make up the majority of the online population. This thing has more computing power than, I'd bet, 80% of the users in the world need. I would expect less than 3% MiniMac sales will be to people intending to use it for PVR apps or hack it in some way.

      Add to this that Apple's target market already owns a malware infested wintel box and subscribe to AOL. So they use their iPod to save their data (check out Apple's switch page) unplug their old wintel crap, put this little box on the desk and in a less than an hour Windows is out of their life.

      If my Mum & Sister didn't already have iMacs I'd get them this.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    4. Re:Serious question: who will buy this? by dknight · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think a lot of slashdotters will buy it, honestly. I know I will.

      Why? Because I've wanted a Mac for a while now, but havent been willing to part with the cash for one. Now there's a nice one in my price range. Will it be top of the line? No. But that's not the point. It will be good enough for me to get the Mac experience, and maybe from there I'll decide that a real high-end mac is worth it.

    5. Re:Serious question: who will buy this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way I see it, the Mac Mini has an excellent market. At the barebones it's an excellent entry level computer, and with a few BTO options you have a very snazy machine in a very small form factor for a very reasonable price (mine with 512MB ram, 80GB HDD and SuperDrive came in at around $800)

      The G4 may not stack well against the G5, but its
      not really supposed to. I have a power book with the same specs, and while it may be slower than my XP box, you'd never know it by using it.

      I'm buying one, those 4 weeks waiting on it are going to be rough, but its going to be awesome when it gets here.

    6. Re:Serious question: who will buy this? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I'm mulling one now. While I fit pretty squarely in the target market for a nice PC, I'm increasingly finding myself increasingly intrigued by something like this. As I my duron system gets long of tooth, I find myself doing almost all gaming on my XBox, so gaming is a less important feature to a new system. I'd like to do web surfing, office work, music, and movies on a PC. And since i keep the computer in the living room I'd like it to be small. The duron system is just under a cubic foot and fits but is large in the entertainment center. While I'd already have an order in if this were a G5 the only remaining choice for me is to get a 20" iMac or one of these and a flat panel.
      I just can't justify shelling out a whole lot of cash on gaming components for games that I find my self playing less and less frequently. The most common PC games I've been playing lately have been Diablo II and Dawn of War (which wouldn't run on the Mac).

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    7. Re:Serious question: who will buy this? by displaced80 · · Score: 1

      Good question, well put. Obviously, I can only answer for myself... but here goes.

      I'm a network admin/programmer (when called upon). My work is a Windows shop, although I can wield some Linuxy l33tness when given the chance.

      I originally got an iMac G3/500 for the family. It's been a great little machine. But it's just not got the power for hard-core web browsing (Safari gets a bit sluggish after 4 or 5 tabs!). Generally, although it works admirably and reliably, I'm after some more power.

      But my switch to the Mac has finally let me do all those things that computers have been promising for decades. I've lost count of the number of times I'd tried out some whiz-bang PIM software or somesuch. Usually, I'd tire of inputting data, or simply find a PC's software and hardware just to unwieldy to use for that sort of 'personal' organisation.

      As OS X matured, and I added a couple of extras (bluetooth USB dongle, iPod, Airport Express)... things have finally clicked.

      Address Book, Mail and iSync work excellently. The Mac pulled my contacts from my phone, and I was sorted. None of the pain of inputting shedloads of information. That's all well and good, but I still wasn't sure how useful it'd be. It could quite easily have turned into the same old thing where I quickly found it inconvenient to use the computer for this stuff.

      However, here's what I call the 'invisible hand' trick. Firstly, the hardware & OS meant the Mac was a solid as a rock. It hasn't once thrown me a curveball in 3 years. Then, it's silent. So it's never powered off, and always available. Important for a living-room computer. I don't have to think about the fact that I'm using a computer when I want to get to my info.

      It's just there -- unobtrusive and reliable. It'll make sure I always have all my info everywhere. Before I've even got my key in the front door, the Mac's interrogating my phone for calendar events, new/modified contact info etc. And I didn't have to do anything. I can note someone's email address on my phone, and just know that when I get home, Address Book and Mail will know it without me raising a finger. When I dock my iPod to charge, it'll load itself up with my contacts' info and full calendar too. Alarms I've set on my phone or in iCal are replicated across all three. The iPod will beep me about an upcoming day event or appointment. Even the stuff my basic phone can't hold -- addresses, notes, whatever -- I can call up anywhere at the scroll of a wheel (and all without needing an internet connection).

      Likewise, iTunes and iPhoto are great media managers. I've coupled iPhoto with the free 'myPhoto' php software and OS X's Apache webserver. Now, my photo library's available anywhere with an internet connection. And again, I do absolutely no work to make this happen. If it's in the library, it's on the web.

      Plus, the Mac is a gateway & firewall for my LAN. DHCP server. File server. SSH provider. VPN tunneller. It mixes flexibility with sheer ease of use. It also has some truly best-in-class software. Adium is a simply beautiful IM client. Omnigraffle is one of those programs I didn't even know I wanted until I tried it. Money's a fantastic home finance application. Keynote's stunning.

      For me, I can't find anything else that gives the combination of excellent design, raw Unix goodness, ease of use, some truly unique applications, breadth of capability and reliability. Windows (paradoxically) doesn't have the software I want... not to mention being about as exciting to use as a ring-binder. Linux is great. I've enjoyed learning more on Linux systems that I have since my old 8-bit computers. But whilst I love the tinkering, the learning and the feedback the Linux provides, sometimes the effort/reward ratio slips. OS X gives me the right balance. The geeky 'aint that cool'ness, mixed with some genuine usefulness, and topped with the down-to-earth day-to-day software I need.

      The Mac Mini will do all this f

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
    8. Re:Serious question: who will buy this? by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      1.25 GHZ is plenty fast. You need to try it out before rushing to judgement on how slow it is.

    9. Re:Serious question: who will buy this? by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      I currently own a PowerBook G4 and use it for my work (Mac application programming). It's a bit more powerful than the Mac Mini, but not hugely so. It has a 1.5GHz processor, which is comparable to the 1.25GHz processor in the base Mini. The video card is quite a bit better, but gcc doesn't really care about that. I have 1.25GB of memory in mine, and sometimes that doesn't even seem like enough, and that is the one place where the Mini will be restrictive compared to this computer. However, most people won't need more than 1GB of memory, and will probably be quite happy with 512MB.

      That said, I probably won't get one for myself. I already have something like it anyway, and I need something portable which the Mac Mini won't be once you throw in the screen. I would love to get one otherwise, though. I might get one for some members of my family who have suffered with PCs for too long, and that seems like the primary target market to me.

      You don't need to do anything special to turn a Mini into a PVR. Buy an eyeTV, plug it in, and you have a PVR.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    10. Re:Serious question: who will buy this? by snow_man · · Score: 1

      well, me, i'll buy one. i use gnu/linux as my primary machine (on a laptop) and aix for my servers. this new mac with it's software & hardware features will become my new "sit next to the phone in the kitchen" machine. it does exactly what i need it to do without any fuss and, i admit, just a cool thing. sure, i could build a Cheap *nix Box but why bother? apple already did it for me!

      --
      i am snow. fear me.
    11. Re:Serious question: who will buy this? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's fast enough to edit video, do any task that 95% of the computing public can even imagine, but you're wondering if it's powerful enough.

      It's more powerful than the Cube you were talking about. New, it costs about the same as a used Cube. Please explain to me how this computer is not powerful enough. So what if it doesn't have a G5? It plays World of Warcraft just fine (according to people with machines of similar spec). My Powerbook has roughly the same specs, and it is my primary computer.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  79. Re:In an attempt to put some news into this story. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Informative

    1. It's apparently the quietest mac ever made. That's pretty damned quiet. TBH It's so small I doubt you'd fit a fan into it! Of course nobody actually has one yet...

    2. The RAM looks like standard SDRAM (most sites say one slot only). The lid looks like a bugger to get off but give it a few days after release and there will be detailed instructions all over the web. No info on the bluetooth & airport - if they've used the same cards as on other macs then it should be easy.. if not, then you'll need to wait for availability.

    3. Compare with a similar speed powerbook.

    4. With a mini? No, because they're not available yet....

  80. yet another daze in pairadice by already_gone · · Score: 1

    pay attention (to the "weather", for example). it's cost effective, & can lead to remarkable insights. remember to consult with/trust in yOUR creators, favoring us with life, liberty, & the pursuit of caring for one another, since/until forever. see you there?

  81. overpriced perhaps, but "insanely"? by baronworm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let's not go overboard.

    You offer a comparison system that's only 10% cheaper, and depending on the details might not even be as well-equipped as the mini. (svideo out? equivalent out-of-the box software bundle that includes being impervious [for now, at least] to viruses and spy-/ad-ware?)

    Feel free to question or mock the zealotry that many of us Mac users exhibit now and then, but give Apple their due on this one: they have, for once, offered a system that is NOT insanely overpriced compared to the competition.

  82. No Mic?! by grounded_roamer · · Score: 1

    did you notice the lack of microphone? One missing jack and a whole host of application are gone.

    1. Re:No Mic?! by Danborg · · Score: 2, Informative

      USB microphones are available.

    2. Re:No Mic?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But take away from the all-in-one appeal of the miniature system.

  83. Could make a neat set-top box. by uberlinuxguy · · Score: 0

    Now if you could get the frontend software of MythTV running on that little guy, and have yourself a nice beefy server running the backend video capture, you'ed have yourself a neat little setup.

    --
    The Uber
    http://www.tulg.org/
    http://devurandom.livejournal.com/
  84. Re:Costly by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

    Sure, a big ugly tower. Try finding a similar speced PC in a similar form
    factor for $499. You won't find any.

    The form factor is part of the value. Same reason you pay more for the ultra
    portable laptops.

    --

    *sigh* back to work...
  85. There's more than 2400 comments on first article! by lonesometrainer · · Score: 1

    How the heck can someone post a dupe on that one? :-)

    Incredible.

  86. You forgot something by paranode · · Score: 1

    The minimum $500 monitor to use it. ;)

    1. Re:You forgot something by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      Well you can get many nice monitors for less than $500, plus as many people have pointed out on other threads, you can take the monitor that already have and plug it in. If I were to buy one that is exactly what I would do.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    2. Re:You forgot something by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Funny

      The minimum $500 monitor to use it.

      Because the flat-screen 17" at Sams for $110 is just too cheap?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  87. Shipping date... by seebs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I first saw it, it said "Estimated arrival by January 22", now it says "3-4 weeks". I assume there was a rush early on.

    It'll be interesting seeing whether it can be easily set up for TV out.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    1. Re:Shipping date... by barzok · · Score: 1
      You can use any TV with Mac mini as a display. Some newer HDTV models already sport a DVI connection, but you'll need the optional S-Video/ Composite Video adapter to use Mac mini with regular TVs.

      Bottom of the right-hand column on http://www.apple.com/macmini/graphics.html

      And here's the adapter http://images.apple.com/macmini/images/indexdviada pter20050111.gif
    2. Re:Shipping date... by RaisinBread · · Score: 2, Informative

      TV out is easy, and for only about $20.

      What I'd like to see is a better audio out option. This thing could make a sweet HTPC. Or HTMac as it were.

    3. Re:Shipping date... by anthonyclark · · Score: 1

      Get yourself a cheap >$40 usb soundblaster or similar with optical out. I tested mine with my powermac and it worked just fine. however, I didn't test optical out so the home theatre thing may not work...

      --
      ----- Documentation is worth it just to be able to answer all your mail with 'RTFM' - Alan Cox.
    4. Re:Shipping date... by sharkey · · Score: 1
      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    5. Re:Shipping date... by babyrat · · Score: 1

      it has a dvi out connector...my tv has a dvi in connector...so apparently it's already set up for a TV (depending on your TV).

      Other than that does it get much easier than http://www.cablestogo.com/product.asp?cat_id=2011& sku=27389

    6. Re:Shipping date... by spacefrog · · Score: 1

      There are any number of fairly cheap USB audio options that might do what you want.

      I use a USB SoundBlaster which has optical in and out on it. It is recognized as a generic USB audio device in every machine I've plugged it into, so I would be surprised if it didn't work on a Mac.

  88. Re:wow by cooley · · Score: 1

    Yeah I am having flashbacks of the cube too. The cube I was saddeled with by a boss who always had to have the latest Mac stuff was awful (and I enjoy working on Macs). It overheated whenever it felt like it, and I went through two video cards before I got a good one from Apple (I suppose it's possible that was a fluke, but I can't imagine others didn't experience that as well). Not a cool machine. It was a better Kleenex tissue dispenser. Hopefully Apple learned lessons from the G4 Cube, and has incorporated that knowledge into the Mini. I sure hope so.

    --
    Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
  89. Editorial Integrety? by Viceice · · Score: 1

    I'm not trying to troll or anything, but slashdot seriously needs to look into some serious editorial changes.

    Maybe theres a night school course the editors can take that will teach them how to run a paper and they can apply it here...

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
  90. Re:Costly by FeloniousPunk · · Score: 1

    If by "much better PC" you mean a PC with a CPU that runs more clock cycles, you are right. If by "much better PC" a PC that is a better computer for the same price, you are wrong.

    --
    I know this because Tyler knows this.
  91. Dual Monitors by FEEBLE*BMX · · Score: 1

    Do any of you guys run dual monitors on your Macs? I'm guessing it won't be possible on the Mini but is there a lower end Mac that will take a dual out video card?

    1. Re:Dual Monitors by nickovs · · Score: 1

      The Mac Mini only has one video output port and no space for expansion cards so it can't drive two monitors. While Apple nominally only allow "screen spanning" on their higher end machines you can in fact tweak most of their models to do this using the Screen Spanning Doctor to change the PROM settings. I've used this successfully on my G4 iMac and I've seen it used on the current G5 iMac hardware. The same code also works on many of the iBook laptops.

      --
      If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
    2. Re:Dual Monitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, grab a used G4 tower.

  92. The Real Question Is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does Roland Piquepaille think about this?

  93. Off To Linux Heaven...Maybe by blueZhift · · Score: 1

    I've been itching for an excuse to get a Mac, but at heart I'm a tight wad. Now I have no more excuses and my current Windows PC can go to Linux server heaven! Well maybe...I am after all, still a tight wad! I think there are many who will be looking for this as a second computer, expect kvm sales to jump a little.

  94. Overpriced? That depends... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    ...if you have been interested in acquiring a modern Mac PC for a while and have been stopped due to the normally high price of Apple PCs, then this MacMini isn't so high priced a solution, especially if you already have a USB Keyboard/Mouse and Monitor handy.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  95. It's got Quicken!!! by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    That was the last Windows program that was holding me on Windows. Now I can get a supported version of Quicken on a reasonably priced computer, and leave the Windows trojans and spyware behind.

    1. Re:It's got Quicken!!! by base3 · · Score: 1

      If you're worried about spyware, I wouldn't run Quicken. It calls home more than a momma's boy at his first summer camp, and displays targed, in-program ads (in a program you pay money for) right up there with the finest spyware available.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    2. Re:It's got Quicken!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that Quicken tries to call home a lot, however, the firewall in place on my DSL line (OpenBSD and pf) blocks all Quicken activity except for quotes and product updates. Intuit is nice enough to use a different host for the ads and spying than the ones they use for the other functions.

  96. Most afforadble Mac ever... by beef3k · · Score: 1

    Or so they claim. $499 you say? Let's see...

    We want the 80gig version with a faster CPU, mainly because 40gigs is too small, which brings us to $599. Add bluetooth, wlan, wireless keyboard and mouse, increase memory from 256 to 512 MB and a a DVD-R and we just make the $1000 mark.

    Oh, and we'll need a display of course. A $299 17" LCD which breaks with the nice design? Or a 20" Apple Cinema Display clocking in at $999? The latter brings the total price tag to $2001.

    Well, it does LOOK good...

    1. Re:Most afforadble Mac ever... by Detritus · · Score: 1

      You forgot $2000 for mag wheels.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:Most afforadble Mac ever... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is that the price goes up when you add optional upgrades and accessories. Well, I guess you saw right through the hype! If you did not already own a computer (and this machine is marketed to those who do), the only things you'd need to buy would be a keyboard, mouse, and display; which would run you ~$250. At this point, you'd buy an eMac. So yes, it is the cheapest Mac ever. The price of upgrades and accessories is irrelevant to that point. The fact that 40GB won't hold your pr0n collection doesn't make the base model any more expensive.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  97. LAME! by af_robot · · Score: 1

    Where moderators looking at?! +Informative ?!

    It is *stupid* to compare SMALL FORM FACTOR MAC with OSX & software with a HUGE, FUCKING NOISY AND POWER-BILLS-EATING Dell PC!!!

    Just try to build somewhere close to Mac Mini specs (size, weight, hardware, software) with a PC equivalents! Similar SFF PC will cost you *TWICE* more.

  98. Miniscule? by Poromenos1 · · Score: 0

    They misspelled minuscule! How can I trust them now?!

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:Miniscule? by kristeh1337 · · Score: 1

      What in the hell are you on about? It is miniscule

  99. Moderator ++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The redundant moderation on this post is pretty astute.

  100. Re:Costly by Klanglor · · Score: 1

    Not Realy for a Shuttle form factor (not nearly as great as small, but the close it gets) you have to shell out 250$ add a 50$ for low cost ram, another 50$ for cheap HD and another 50 for CPU and finaly another 20$ for a crapy CD-rom/burner. You mount out to 420$. If you want to be realy fair add 139$ for windows XP. you don't get nearly as great deal.

    Howerver, i would not buy it. 299$ maybe. :D I would rather get a ibook G5 (LCD screenw with it)
    I realy Love the mac, started with them.. but i don't quite like the price.

  101. Get an adapter by just+someone · · Score: 1

    If it's that important to you, you can get an adapter.

  102. Just in time for Valentines Day! by log0n · · Score: 1

    Maybe I can replace the Apple logo with a nice red 3.

  103. you need to learn where to buy a monitor! by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

    Like here and here and here.

    Those are LCDs, you could go even cheaper and get this, or this one.

    That, or whip out an old one all the PC people claim to have that keeps them from buying an iMac or eMac because they 'already have that stuff'

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    1. Re:you need to learn where to buy a monitor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah well apple has improved then since they decided to use real world monitors.

    2. Re:you need to learn where to buy a monitor! by godlikenerddotcom · · Score: 1
      ah well apple has improved then since they decided to use real world monitors.

      Where have you been for the last 5 years?

    3. Re:you need to learn where to buy a monitor! by gullevek · · Score: 1

      erm, not until the newest models apple has switched to "normal" dvi. before it was the apple propriatary connector (the one that could upstream usb with the round corners). a studio display from ~2 years ago won't work with a mac mini ... neither a new display with an old mac. you need converters inbetween.

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
  104. Yeah... by jacobcaz · · Score: 1

    Last Tuesday called; it wants its story back.

  105. just my opinion... by idiotism · · Score: 1

    creating the mac minis was a great idea, and if you think $500 for a mac is a rip off, then you're too poor to afford a mac in general. i have a powerbook 4 with a 1.5, 512MB RAM and a 80gig hd. that cost me around $2500. this mac mini is the equivalent of the powermac i have. an airport upgrade is only $50 and you can get the 1GB stick of DDR333 for $150, if you really wanted it maxed. the 1.5 powerpc processor is fast enough to handle and program for mac, unless youre doing high end video editing, and if youre doing that, buy a powermac. the main reason i think they came out with this, is for the same reason i want one...airport extreme with airtunes. this thing makes for one perfect in home MP3 player if you get the airport upgrade. moster cables from airport extreme right to your receiver. just an avid mac fans opinion.

  106. Is that PC silent? by BerntB · · Score: 1
    Is that PC silent? I've not seen any lowpriced silent PCs?

    (The Mac should have a low noise volume since the electronics are similar to their portables? Can't find any dB spec on the net?)

    If so, I'm impressed.

    --
    Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
  107. Re:Costly by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Your post reminded me of that one time I was sick so I was laying home on the couch watching Daytime TV and to weak to change the station. There was one of those Court shows were on. And this person was Suing a Computer Repair guy for overcharging for his work. The Repair Guy charged like $200 for a new harddrive (I don't know the size of the drive or the date the show was recorded). Now the reason he is suing him because he checked on ebay and found the same drive for $50. Luckily the Repair Guy won.
    But here is the moral of the story. No Apple will not be the cheapest out there they probably never will. It is not in there interest to be cheapest it is in there interest to be priced at the Sweet Spot (Where the tradeoff aren't Customers turned off by the price and Margin are highest) Meet the peak spot, creating max revenue. Sure you will find people selling stuff for less of a price then apple and some of it will be the same/equivalent specs or better. But most of these guys are trying to...
    A. Get rid of old inventory.
    B. Get enough sales to be recognized as a brand name.
    C. Trying to sell stuff to Walmart.
    D. Trying to undercut there competitors.
    E. The Highest price they can offer before people decide to go to someone else.

    If you are Tiny PC Shop and you are priced the same as Dell or Gateway people will look at your system prices and just go to a bigger name brand. You are all using the same equipment so the only thing you can do keep sales up is sell for less margin.
    So $499 is actually a good price. Yes there are things cheaper but it is a good price. And just wait about 6 months you can get a better price of ebay for these.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  108. Re:wow by kjamez · · Score: 1

    i've never been a mac user (does an apple IIe count?) but this little box, for (only) $500, i can have an entry-level mac with panther and some sample mac software, network card, airport card, etc, etc. i already have a bunch of capable heads (you can still hook up pc monitors/lcd's, right? dont have to buy an overpriced cinema display ...? )

    i don't even want it to come with a keyboard or mouse. it's small enough and neat loooking enough that i would put it on my desk, and vnc in, or get a third head, and use synergy2 as a kvm solution.

    $500 isn't much. but i am concerned about this being a first-generation beast. maybe when it's been road-tested some i'll buy it.

    --
    you can't have everything, where would you put it?
  109. Say Hello To My Little Friend! by islandless · · Score: 1

    As a mac/unix user from the old school (CMU, Lisa, 1983, bitches!). I'm laughing my ass off at the scramble for reasons this mac doesn't exceed every fence post sitter's demands, worries, and fears. hahahhahaha

    OK, enough laughing. some info for those of you that were mired in windows patches when everyone else learned this:

    1) Why is ram so expensive, and can i install it myself?
    Its so expensive because apple charges for ram like its not a user installable part. Just like an airfilter in a car, if you don't know how to do it, you'll have to pay a premium to have someone do it for you. While i don't know if the mac mini is bolted shut, or not, i do know that as soon as 1 nerd with a digital camera gets one, there'll be a how-to online.

    2) Can it do media center things?
    In case you missed it, this thing can edit HDDV, hello!
    Yes, of course it can, there is a lot of software mostly collected in 2 places: versiontracker.com and macupdate.com, my personal favorite is VIDI, freeware viewer software for a formacTV device i have..
    Please show us, Windows Fans, editing HD, DV, whatever, on a $500 dell, please?

    3) There is no software!
    Come on, read the last post, search for something and you'll find there is more then enough software for nearly any purpose, barring native OSX software, any and all X11 apps will work too.

    Anyway, i'm being overcome with laughter just thinking about reading the posts made since I started composing this post, have fun with yer virii, spyware, bad patches, malware, and whatever else the windows world utterly tolerates if not encourages.

    As always, us mac users are bemused by your particular choice of purgatory, but still welcome those of you who are awake long enough to realize what is happening as friends.

  110. This is the future by FlyingPostman · · Score: 0

    This is where personal computers are headed. Microsoft has wanted to do this for years, but the problem is is that they don't control the hardware. Apple can design a computer any way they please, as long as it runs OS X it doesn't matter about "form factor". PC's have to become appliances. Who cares if the mac mini isn't upgradable? In a couple years, buy a new one. This machine is better than the iMac concept becuase your pretty 20" lcd won't go obsolete when the computer does. This machine is also powerful enough for 80% of the users out there who just browse the net, download some photos from their camera and type a document now and then.

  111. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by Bart+van+der+Ouderaa · · Score: 1

    Ehm, not quite:

    mac mini = 499 euro including tax

    the euro is doing about 1.30, so the mac mini is 30% more expensive compared to the US price of 499 dollars.

    The tax is only 19,5%

    still missing 10.5 %

  112. Programmers by geekster · · Score: 1

    I've always wanted a Mac but have been put off by the price. Now this seems like an excellent, affordable, opportunity to test out that cross-platform code.

  113. video editing by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    XP comes with Movie Maker. There's a free upgrade to version 2.

    1. Re:video editing by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Its shit though...

    2. Re:video editing by nicky_d · · Score: 1

      Version 2 is certainly not 'shit', it's an excellent simple editor that costs nothing. Its one failing is that it limits you to DV or WMV output; I render to DV AVI and then encode externally. I've used iMovie a lot, and I do find that preferable in terms of integration with iLife and certain functions, Windows Movie Maker is still an excellent choice for anyone who's picked up a video camera, has a PC, and doesn't need to pay for or learn to use Premiere.

      Importing, navigating, editing and adding effects and transitions are all very straighforward and easy to undo. It hasn't reached bloat stage yet. I think it's one of Microsoft's better offerings for the home user, to be honest. If it were a Linux app, I think it'd be hailed as a giant-killer.

    3. Re:video editing by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      As I said, shit. All the points you listed make it sound even worse.

    4. Re:video editing by simon+hughes · · Score: 0

      No it isn't.

    5. Re:video editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mac mini does HD editing right out of the box. You should add an external firewire disk. Else you would be making very very short movies.

    6. Re:video editing by tricorn · · Score: 1

      "very straightforward" "easy to undo" "hasn't reached the bloat stage" "simple" "costs nothing" makes it "sound even worse"? So the perfect program for you would be difficult to use even for the simplest thing, impossible to undo (because you never make mistakes and offering an undo feature is an insult to your manhood?), bloated with thousands of features you'll never use, needlessly complex and costs half your annual salary? Now that's a small-niche market if I there ever was one!

    7. Re:video editing by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      The export options was one of the things I disliked...

  114. Wait, wait, wait... by TrueJim · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Darth Vader is Luke Skywalker's FATHER???

    (D'oh! Shoulda posted a spoiler warning. Sorry.)

    --
    I hope that after I die the one word people use to describe me is "resurrected."
  115. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by GtKincaid · · Score: 1

    I have been really angry with the apple store for the premium i have to pay for apple hardware being an EU resident.
    For example the price in dollars is the same as the price in euros nearly $499 != 498 , however this is how much of a premium we are forced to pay . It dosnt seem bad till you consider this is a 25% premium nearly , i could understand(possibly) a small premium for a foreign language version ,but when you want it in international english its a mute point ,perhaps say bar 3-5% for things like tax.

    Instead of buying a powermac , which i could afford without this premium .I am forced to buy one of these mac mini' or an eMac. it may seem like a good idea to charge this premium. but you are knocking you customers down a product range

  116. Apple Also Introduces Flash Player! by BondGamer · · Score: 1

    OMG, has Apple lost their mind? Why didn't they annouce all this stuff at the big Macworld Expo 3 days ago? They have really lost their style............

    1. Re:Apple Also Introduces Flash Player! by kristeh1337 · · Score: 1

      In other news, lamer posts dupe comment.

  117. Re:Costly by emilymildew · · Score: 1

    Wait, you mean... there are computers out there that are CHEAPER than Apple? My god, man! Why didn't anyone tell me before? I could have saved ALL THIS MONEY!

    Throwing it away, oh, the horror, the horror.

  118. Internal or external power supply? (and a fantasy) by sita · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is kind of difficult to tell from the pictures. An external power supply (like laptops have) would make a lot of sense. Also it would make the following wishful thinking slightly more realistic:

    Imagine a mac mini. Add a battery pack. Add wireless option. Throw it in your backpack. Add wireless screen (sort of like a tablet PC but just enough computing power to be a remote desktop client...for the mac mini you have in your back ack). In your home office, add a dock, and a real screen, keyboard and mouse. And so on.

    In my dreams, at least.

  119. Be alert & call Apoc! by rcastro0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Neo: Whoa, deja vu.
    Trinity: What did you just say?
    Neo: Nothing, I just had a little deja vu.
    Trinity: What did you see?
    Cypher: What happened?
    Neo: A black cat went past us, and then another that looked just like it.
    Trinity: How much like it, was it the same cat?
    Neo: Might have been, I'm not sure.
    Morpheus: Switch, Apoc.
    Neo: What is it?
    Trinity: A deja vu is usually a glitch in the Matrix. It happens when they change something.

    --
    Quem a paca cara compra, paca cara pagará.
  120. What... by Domini · · Score: 1

    ..huh?

    Woop-di-doo!
    Old news guys!

  121. Re:In an attempt to put some news into this story. by emilymildew · · Score: 1

    Someone in another thread said that while the RAM might not be hard to install, it will be very obvious that your warranty has been voided. So, I mean, if you don't mind THAT, go for it.

  122. *Gasp* by paranode · · Score: 3, Funny
    Because the flat-screen 17" at Sams for $110 is just too cheap?

    Then we wouldn't be overpaying for Apple products, now would we? What kind of Apple zealot are you anyways?!?

    1. Re:*Gasp* by godlikenerddotcom · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Then we wouldn't be overpaying for Apple products, now would we?

      Right, because paying more for a color accurate LCD with built-in firewire and USB 2.0 hubs isn't worth it to some people.

    2. Re:*Gasp* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Because the flat-screen 17" at Sams for $110 is just too cheap?
      >Then we wouldn't be overpaying for Apple products, now would we? What kind of Apple zealot are you anyways?!?

      The next generation. :D

  123. mac mini at mom's house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is great, I'm getting my mom one. The next time she has a computer problem I'll tell her just to unplug her mac mini and have my little brother drive it over to my apartment. Easy as that.

    1. Re:mac mini at mom's house by Dogbert2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, It seems easy enough.

  124. Re:My credit card jumped, but then reality set in by guidryp · · Score: 1

    Initially. I said Wow perfect quiet Media box and a chance to use OSX all in one. I am so there.

    I am not going to whine about the Ram, it can be upgraded to 512M for a reasonable price, but as a media center one item that kills it. No Digital Audio out for DD/DTS.

    $100+ to get digital out? I don't think so. Kludgy and expensive is what these USB external sound boxes are. For under $10 they could have had optical out on the box at the very least.

    I am sure they will sell all they can build, but the days of paying $100 for sound are long behind me. My Nforce motherboard was less than that and has awesome on board sound.

    My current crude, somewhat noisy, hand built PC will have to continue it's media center duties for a while longer yet.

    Apple could chew up the media center market if they chose to devote resources in that direction.

    Something to the mini. With built in A/V input/output. Digitial Audio/IO. PVR sw and built in IR or Blutooth and remote. Call it a Media Mac...

  125. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring up the US Dollar and maybe it will happen. You are living with the results of all the HATE U.S. and quest to keep the dollar low. Just because you want to come to the U.S. and tour on the cheap and hate the current administration. You can't have it both ways. How about come visit NY, spend some $$ and go to the Apple store and pick one up and bring it back.

  126. Re:Internal or external power supply? (and a fanta by kristeh1337 · · Score: 1

    That doesn't seem particularly unrealistic in all honesty... I give it a month before there is a /. link to a tutorial on how to do it...

  127. ??? Retail ??? by CousinLarry · · Score: 1

    Has anybody found a date when minis and shuffles will be available in Apple stores?

  128. Probably external by Spy+Handler · · Score: 2, Informative
    Picture of Mini Mac's back shows a power plug that is clearly not a regular AC plug. I'm pretty sure it's got an external AC to DC adapter like laptops.

    Although your dream loses its point when you stop and consider that you could just get an iBook for that kind of money...

    1. Re:Probably external by sita · · Score: 1

      Although your dream loses its point when you stop and consider that you could just get an iBook for that kind of money...

      Yes and no. Obviously Apple has to supply the parts (or support the scheme if the parts are third party) for this to be worthwhile, and if they do, there is no reason the combination would be more expensive than an iBook.

      Laptops are clumsy in some situations (they are difficult to use well while standing up away from a desk, they are less than comfortable when couch-surfing (and burn your balls, mind you!) and are more difficult to upgrade. With my dream above, you can upgrade the parts separately.

  129. Re:Yes Laptop drive. by guidryp · · Score: 1

    I can't remember where I read it though.

  130. Seems a little impractical.... by FlimFlamboyant · · Score: 2, Interesting

    .... for a desktop, as they seem to be attempting to pass it off as. Sure, you could use it as one, but it would seem more appropriate to use it as a portable, in which case, why not just get a laptop?

    Where's the mic port? Is it just my ignorance of Apple hardware showing, or is there not one?

    --
    But God demonstrates his love for us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us - (Romans 5:8)
    1. Re:Seems a little impractical.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Steve Jobs and his "accessorize!" bullshit. You have to use a USB mic/line-in. Too bad, other than that glaring detail, it's perfect.

    2. Re:Seems a little impractical.... by FlimFlamboyant · · Score: 1

      You have to use a USB mic/line-in. Too bad, other than that glaring detail, it's perfect.

      Ah... And once you've plugged your keyboard and mouse in to the only two USB ports that it has....? I guess you're going to need a tiny hub to go with your tiny Mac.

      --
      But God demonstrates his love for us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us - (Romans 5:8)
    3. Re:Seems a little impractical.... by Raptor+CK · · Score: 1

      It's the answer to the piece of crap $500 Wal-Mart PCs, which, for all their theoretical upgradability, get tossed out once they're out of date anyway.

      The difference here, of course, is that the Mac mini has better hardware (not the CPU, necessarily, but the video is way better,) and isn't a liable to completely suck as the historically mediocre beige boxes you get from Joe PC Builder.

      I'm guessing that Apple expects the users to buy a USB mic when they need one, or hook up an iSight and kill two birds with one stone. It's not *too* crazy, but I'll admit, I still haven't used the mic port on my Powerbook, and while I had bought a 1/8" jack based stereo headset for my PC, I could've just as easily gone the USB route.

      --
      Raptor
      "Procrastination is great. It gives me a lot more time to do things that I'm never going to do."
    4. Re:Seems a little impractical.... by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Why not get a laptop? One big reason is because it's $500 cheaper than Apple's cheapest laptop (and presumably similarly cheaper than equivalent PC laptops). It doesn't come with a screen or anything, but if you already have those, it'll be a significant savings. Even if you don't, you can put together a nice desktop computer with a much larger screen for much less money than simply buying a portable.

      There probably is no mic port. Apple doesn't seem to feel that they are cost-effective these days. You can get inexpensive USB audio input devices with mic ports if you really need one.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  131. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by rolocroz · · Score: 1

    I'm sure this never occurred to Apple and they will immediately change the prices of this computer based on a petition from some random Internet nerds.

    --

    I meta-mod all positive moderation Unfair, because it's abuse of the system.

  132. PVR Potential? by Erastus · · Score: 1

    I've been thinking about putting together a PVR/Media PC to hook to the TV. The TV has VGA/DVI in. Is there good software/hardware for OSX that would make this practical? Being quiet and sized the way it is, it has several qualities I've been looking for. I'd basically add wireless net, wireless keyboard/mouse, USB PVR hardware, and maybe a big USB disk for storage. Since I'd like to try out OSX anyway, this might be a neat way to. Any thoughts?

    1. Re:PVR Potential? by luhar · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. Use this as a media server. My only concern is that I have a Sony TV, and they only support HDCP through the DVI port, so I'd need to be able to get a component video signal out of this. ATI has supported this nicely in the past, just don't know if the 9200 supports this through a dongle.

  133. Re:In an attempt to put some news into this story. by Angostura · · Score: 1

    I doubt it is the quietest ever made - wasn't the cube fanless? This has a fan.

  134. Mod up by bogie · · Score: 1

    You know that is a great point. Ever time the subject of Itunes and things like the hymn project come up we have to listen to post after post from Apple users saying "Hey you bought Apple's product knowing the Terms of Service. Deal with it or don't buy it!".
    So now we are supposed to go against that and ignore Apple's terms of service and try to install extra memory while at the same time keeping our warranty. Sorry but that just wouldn't be honest or in keeping with what Apple wanted. If you don't agree with Apple's policy on memory than don't buy a Mini Mac. Anything else if of course illegal.
    So, how does your situational ethics sit with you now apologists? Very well from every post I'm seeing here and at Mac sites telling people not to pay for Apple's overpriced memory.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:Mod up by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Um, actually, the new iMac is designed for user upgradability. Nice layout, easy to open.

    2. Re:Mod up by Zemrec · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe I heard once that Apple uses Micron memory. Crucial.com is a Micron reseller I believe. 512 MB PC2700 Non-ECC is $80.99, $5.99 more than the $75 Apple wants for the upgrade to 512 MB (although I wonder why they just don't subtract the cost of the 256MB that it came with originally?)

      And 1 GB stick is $299.99, which admittedly is a lot less than the $400 something Apple wants. But realistically, why would you need 1 GB in a low-end machine? Sure, you [i]could[/i] do Photoshop or Final Cut Pro or (insert professional app here), but the other (more expensive) Macs are better suited to those tasks.

    3. Re:Mod up by justins · · Score: 1
      although I wonder why they just don't subtract the cost of the 256MB that it came with originally?

      Because they are ripping you off. Do you really need to ask? Do you think there is some elaborate explanation here that spins in Apple's favor?

      Crucial.com is a Micron reseller I believe.

      Crucial is owned by Micron, and it's not the cheapest place to get modules using Micron RAM, or even the cheapest place to get modules with the "Crucial" brand. Therefore the price differences in your examples are in reality more profound, and Apple is actually ripping people off a lot more than you acknowledge.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    4. Re:Mod up by Zemrec · · Score: 1

      "Acknowledge"?

      Like there's some sort of Mac-fanboi/Apple conspiracy?

      WTF?

      I'm not a fanboi, neither do I have any stake in Apple.

      Crucial is where I've been going for RAM for years. I used that as a comparison because I know its Micron memory and its a source I trust. I have also seen Crucial/Micron at Newegg and other online stores as well. Would it make you happier if I posted those prices instead?

      And like someone posted earlier in a different thread, ALL OEMs charge a heavy fee on extras like RAM (unless they have a special running.) So, if you want the box but don't want to pay the extra for the RAM, buy the box with the least amount they give you and then buy your 3rd party RAM. BFD.

      Yes I also saw they they're probably making opening the box a warranty voiding risk, but so what? Its geared to mostly consumers who would just as soon stick a ham-sandwich in the computer as a RAM stick.

      The fact that the clued-in also can use it for other tasks besides Introduction to Mac 101 is icing on the cake.

    5. Re:Mod up by justins · · Score: 1
      I'm not a fanboi

      Haha. Sure.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  135. hotcakes? by SilveRo_kun · · Score: 1

    I just don't get this expression... Is it just me?
    How many of you /.ters buy hotcakes?

    1. Re:hotcakes? by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Considering that hotcake ~= pancake, I'd guess that more than a few slashfiends mow 'em down.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    2. Re:hotcakes? by SilveRo_kun · · Score: 1

      Oh, now it makes more sense =P.

  136. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, Apple users are Kerry supporters... Flip-floppers to the bitter end.

    "I don't mind paying a premium for a Mac."

    "I don't want to pay a premium for a Mac."

  137. Hrm by The-Bus · · Score: 1

    Well if it works for lazy Slashdot editors, it should work for me. I'm just going to do a link to my comment on the previous story. Saves the work of trying to think of a new reply.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  138. Hey, knee-jerk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    err.... i believe that the person you are refering to in this particular thread is actually on your side. I could be wrong, but gp is stating that you DO get a lot of (crap) software with a Dell, above and beyond the obligitory spyware you will get with a windows setup.

    Get it? That's the punchline. Laugh.

    1. Re:Hey, knee-jerk... by sgant · · Score: 1

      err.... i believe that the person you are refering to in this particular thread is actually on your side. I could be wrong, but gp is stating that you DO get a lot of (crap) software with a Dell, above and beyond the obligitory spyware you will get with a windows setup.

      Oh, thought he was talking about the Apple. And I was being honest, as I don't use Apple or own one so I wanted to know what spyware etc etc.

      I guess it came across as me being a smart-ass...which I usually am. But I honestly wanted to know. As for a PC having all that stuff, then yeah, I know most come with stuff pre-installed to "just help ya out"...lol

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    2. Re:Hey, knee-jerk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not alone. I thought he was being an ass too. Interesting how casual compliments can be mistaken as poorly honed digs!

    3. Re:Hey, knee-jerk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No prob. this is /., so I don't blame you for the type of reaction you gave, since 9 times out of 10, they usually ARE being smartasses. (i had to read it a couple of times myself...) ;-)

  139. Re:In an attempt to put some news into this story. by Angostura · · Score: 1

    1. From http://www.apple.com/macmini/design.html

    "Best of all, Mac mini purrs along at a whisper-quiet sound level, so there's no reason to hide it under your desk like an old PC to save your ears."

    Oddly, the Australian version of Apple's site has this:

    "Best of all, Mac mini features a teensy little fan, too, so there's no reason to hide it under your desk like an old PC to save your ears."

    It has a fan.

  140. On the off chance someone hasn't mentioned this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Here's the problem... new mini mac looks nice, yes?
    $499 US? Great, right?

    Upgradable? No. This is Apple's problem, one which all but destroyed IBMs footing in the home PC market: proprietary is always more expensive. So, when you need a new Mac, you throw out the old one and rebuy. I, on the otherhand, have kept my box in shape 1 piece at a time as I could afford it.

    Total initial cost of machine? less than $1100 CDN when I bought a Duron 800 with 512M of ram, a nice IBM HD, a decent video card, and a 19" Viewsonic Perfect Flat.

    Total cost of upgrades over the past 5 years? ~$500 CDN, ammortized over that entire life span. I still use the same case, same soundcard, same HD, and same CD writer. 2 New procs, new mobo, new ram, new powersupply, new videocard, 2 new HDs (I have 3 now).

    You might say "Thats $1.6k!" But keep in mind, thats Canadian currency, and its been spent over 5 years. Thats 100 dollars per year to keep my box current. Much cheaper and easier in the long run.

    I'd love a Mac, but I'd *never* pay the price they're asking. Ever. Most people I know wouldn't either.

    It just doesn't make sense.

    And that, my friends, is the best reason PC's rule the home user market.

    Dare I ask, if Stevie J is so smart how come he hasn't figured this out yet, when it's so obvious to everyone else in the first world?

  141. I can't stand hypocrits. by Cougem · · Score: 1

    If microsoft gave you a video editing suite they'd probably get suit for it. Monopolisation if you do, lack of features if you don't.

    1. Re:I can't stand hypocrits. by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      Windows Movie Maker...video editing suite including with Windows XP already at version 2. Does simple video editing includings combining clips, adding transitions, using multiple audio channels...basically anything that a typical user would want to do to edit home movies.

  142. Needed: Cheap Apple Monitor by queersyd · · Score: 1

    Call me superficial, but the main appeal of the Mac and other Apple products (I have never owned any) is their sublime zen-like design, visually speaking. But the price was always too high for me. Like everyone else I'm thinking, "ok, now I'll get one". But alas, it ain't gonna happen.

    The visual design of the mini certainly doesn't disappoint. It follows the gorgeous minimalist design that makes Apple products so desireable. Except I won't be able to enjoy this aspect because it will be dwarfed by the butt-ugly monitor I'll have to plug it into (by any other manufacturer) unless I want to pay $999 for the least expensive apple monitor (which I would LOVE but is way to expensive for me).

    Is it too much to ask for Apple to sell the 17" flat CRT monitor from the eMac as a stand alone or a 15" LCD for $150-200? Probably. If this was available I would probably go ahead and purchase my first Mac.

    1. Re:Needed: Cheap Apple Monitor by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      Wait... so it's Apple's fault that you had no taste when you bought that butt-ugly monitor you're currently using?

    2. Re:Needed: Cheap Apple Monitor by garagekubrick · · Score: 1

      Why don't you buy an eMac, then? It would cost as much as you're willing to spend.

      This is what is so bizzare about the marketplace. This product that you've wanted is out there. You just don't want it in the eMac box.

      --
      ** http://www.nkhumanrights.or.kr/ ** Human rights in North Korea. 1 million estimated dead from starvation.
  143. Apple keynote roundup by mrdaveb · · Score: 1

    If you've been stuck on the ISS or asleep for a few days, you can get a decent summary of all the announcements made at the Apple Keynote here

    --
    Homme petit d'homme petit, s'attend, n'avale
  144. Mac Mini pricing??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's already making the rounds of the free sites. Bug some friends, pick up a few, and cluster away.

    http://free.GearLive.com/index.php?referral=146

  145. editors by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 1

    Seriously, how do they pick these guys?

    "Hey, do you live under a rock, can't spell, aren't really current on technology, and don't read slashdot? Have WE got a job for you!"

    1. Re:editors by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      "Do you like to eat tacos?"

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  146. Why the G5 logo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It only comes in a G4 flavor.

  147. Cluster? by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1
    Here's what I came up with on my blog:

    Ok, I admitted to being a geek a long time ago, but here's what I'm thinking:

    Take Apple's new MAC Mini, which is 2" in height (slightly over 1U). Put several of them on a metal tray. Why? Because it can become a makeshift blade server. Granted your limited to Firewire, USB, and 10/100 Ethernet. Regardless, for rather low cost, you can get some decent power. All with 2U of rack space. IMHO that's pretty cool. Looks like it's a pretty simple way to get a cluster. You could even use it for some decent web hosting. 1 as a DB server, 1 or 2 as an Apache server, and perhaps a squid proxy. Mail, DNS. Each could have their own redundancy. All in 2U of rack space.

    That's amazingly low cost for having so many CPU's, and being able to spread out your load on several physical systems.

    If I had the cash, I'd give it a go. :-D
    1. Re:Cluster? by TinyManCan · · Score: 1
      Why not turn them on their sides. They are 2" tall, so you could fit 9 of them on a 19" rackmount tray. Since they are 6.5" wide (err, tall in this case) they will fit into 4u, with a bit of spare space for the tray and airflow.

      Placing them vertically gives you 9 mini's in 4U, whereas your solution only provides 6 mini's in 4.

      Go with the 1.25ghz model and tell OS X to turn off the harddrive when not in use, and I bet a whole rack of these (90 minis by my reckoning) would have a very manageable heat and power load.

      Now, you could also go more than one layer deep. A deep 32" x 19" tray would allow for at least 36 minis per shelf. Stack those all the way up the rack and you get 360 minis in a single rack. You would need serious AC and power to support that I would imagine. Amazing density though.

      You're right about the 10/100 ethernet though. That is going to seriously degrade performance in many entperprise/clustering jobs. On the other hand, this setup would be *excellent* for a web farm.

  148. ok, I am having a bad morning 'splaining myself by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    original post I replied to- what can you do with a 500$ pc you can't with a 500$ mac.

    I was trying to retort, that for $500, I can type, navigate, and SEE.. the 1k monitor comment was a add-on..

    so- let me start over for 500$, pc vs mac,

    I can see a lcd screen, and type, and navigate...

    p.s. did you know that the cheapest monitor is 1k at apple? wow...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  149. Fanboys shoulden't be allowed to debate this... by Dogbert2 · · Score: 1
    "Hardcore" fanboys of either platform are not equpped to carry on an intelligent hardware discussion. It inevitably degrades into a stupid flame war where countless worthless benchmarks and anecdotes are brought out and usually ends in a stalemate where the PC kiddies complain about how the Mac cannot play games.

    Users shouldn't try to carry out an engineer's discussion, but they try nevertheless.

    -uberpenguin

    http://forums.g4techtv.com/messageview.cfm?catid=5 9&threadid=329404&STARTPAGE=1

  150. price that up for me by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    ...there's a good lad.

    1. Re:price that up for me by godlikenerddotcom · · Score: 1
      Wait... you said you couldn't add those things to the Mac mini. I just showed that you could.

      I'm not going to do the research to find these products for you and then shop for the best price for you too. Do you need someone to hold you hand and do everything for you?

    2. Re:price that up for me by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      no, the point is that all those components are significantly more expensive than commodity-PC equivalents. my point is that it's all well and good selling a cheap entry-level machine, but if you want to do the aforementioned fun stuff, it's not going to be cheap anymore.

    3. Re:price that up for me by godlikenerddotcom · · Score: 1

      You didn't say that in your original post. You said "get x". You need to improve your writing skills if you were trying to get across some notion of cost.

  151. Engage brain... by CountBrass · · Score: 1

    Easy: buy something other than a home user computer: eg an iMac or a PowerMac.

    I don't hear people complaining that you can't upgrade an XBox's memory or hardrive without voiding the warranty. The Mac Mini is aimed at the same market: they want a box that does the job: they don't need or want to spend their time pissing about with its innards.

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    1. Re:Engage brain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They might want to 'piss about with its innards' in a year or two when a RAM upgrade would be enough to keep it up to snuff.

    2. Re:Engage brain... by justins · · Score: 1
      they want a box that does the job: they don't need or want to spend their time pissing about with its innards.

      Well, I don't either. The problem is that they want to rip me off with the cost of their memory upgrade. I'll pass, thanks.

      I'm curious to see how the various Apple reseller avenues handle this. It seems to me one (perhaps the only) good way for third party resellers to actually compete with Apple's web and retail sales while selling these things would be selling upgrades for a reasonable price.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  152. because i want to plug it into my TV? by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    do VHS video recorders only come with DVI?

  153. Any one else reminded of Dumb and Dumber? by lsmeg · · Score: 1

    We landed on the MOON!

    --
    It's OK! I'm a limo driver!
  154. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by rjstanford · · Score: 1

    And in the USA, state and local sales taxes aren't included in any published prices. And yes, speaking as a British ex-pat, that seems weird.

    However - here in Austin, TX we pay 8.25% sales tax on all purchases above and beyond the listed price. Now you're down to, what, a 2% price difference? Seems pretty reasonable for me, and well within the bounds of "rounding."

    Additionally, I remember seeing some of the GB people posting that theirs was working out cheaper (GBP) than the US pricing was. Go figure.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  155. 5 years old?!?! by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

    Just not enough to make me leave behind the utility of Linux for a world of locked down gaudy nonsense and five year old versions of *nix utilities.

    That does not compute, most of the *nix utilities are included in OS.X, ok, some of them may not be familiar to the LINUX user being that OS.X descends from BSD. Even so they are not five years old and what is out of date can be replaced with minimal effort since most of the LINUX power user utilities have been ported to OS.X anyway.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  156. Adapter for $4.99 by objekt · · Score: 1
    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  157. My thoughts exactly ... by JoeGee · · Score: 1

    Thank you for your comment. Without digital out, this WOULDN'T be an ideal HTPC. Still, I could see popping one of these on the home network and using it to play back streaming divx and mp3 content, for not much more than a dedicated digital media appliance. It wouldn't be the audiophile's choice, but throw in the super drive (or whatever they call their DVD writer) and you've still got a relatively powerful, very inconspicuous little device that can at least replace the el cheapo DVD player/recorder, the el cheapo CD player, and the MSN TV box. :)

    --

    Get off my virtual lawn, you damned virtual kids!
    1. Re:My thoughts exactly ... by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      It seems like Apple is making strategic moves with their hardware design, and this is one. For people who already have monitors, keyboards, and mice, this would be a very appealing and an easy way for Apple to get them onto OS X. But it seems like Apple didn't realise they were also making something that would fit the HTPC market as well, since they didn't include digital out. An AirPort Express could be used for that, but there is a minute delay in the audio output of AirPort Express units so they would only work well with iTunes, and not the DVD Player.

      There is another minor flaw in the design; they also should have added one more USB port to it for a printer in order for it to function as a regular computer, without having to add USB hubs. However, I suppose an AirPort Express could be used for that too, since it provides a USB port for a printer, but this product should be able to stand on it's own.

      But I have had constant problems with my Airport express and finally decided to just stop using it in favour of a direct rather than wireless broadband connection. I don't know what the problems are, I just find it the network goes down and I have to reset and re-configure the unit from scratch every time. Sometimes it runs smoothly for long stretches, other times it seems like I have to keep fiddling with it for ages to get it to simply work.

      Since it is their first generation of the Mac mini, I'm sure it will go through the necessary changes, just as the iPod did. The first iPod had a physically rotating scroll wheel, while the subsequent model ended up with a non-moving touch-sensitive surface scroll wheel, then the docking base station, clickwheel, etc. I was wondering if besides being used as an HTPC, if it eventually gets digital out, could it simultaneously fill the role of a video game console as well. All the games available on the Mac would be playable in the home theatre.

  158. There's no point in including PS/2 by RJabelman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you get a Mac Mini, you're realistically going to have to get a Mac keyboard, as they have buttons that PC keyboards don't have. (The Command key for starters, although this probably translates to something else on the PC board. Plus, the power switch on the Mini is on the back. Much nicer to have one of the apple keyboards with the power key.) As for the mouse: I can't remember the last time I saw a (reasonably new) PC without a USB mouse.

    1. Re:There's no point in including PS/2 by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      Modern Apple keyboards dont have a power key (a shame imo) but you can shutdown or sleep Macs from a menu. I'm sure that must be a shock.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    2. Re:There's no point in including PS/2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      95% of PCs sold at BestBuy have PS/2 kbd and mouse. No USB come in the box.

      But who cares

    3. Re:There's no point in including PS/2 by displaced80 · · Score: 1

      The Apple keyboards have different notation on the modifier keys, but no more than a modern Windows keyboard.

      When I connect my Apple Pro USB keyboard to my PC, the Command key maps to the Windows key, Option maps to Alt, and (unsurprisingly) Control is Control.

      Likewise, my Logitech Cordless Desktop MX which I bought for my PC has both PC and Mac labels on the keys. Win-logo & Command 'splat'. 'Alt' & the Option 'train-tracks'.

      I'm planning on ordering a 1.5GHz Mac Mini (+ bluetooth/802.11g, Superdrive, 512MB) on pay-day. I reckon I'll get a USB KVM switch and hook the Cordless Desktop's base unit to the switch. I'll be able to stay wireless, and be able to toggle between to two systems with a couple of keypresses.

      I don't think there's been a Power button on Apple keyboards since they used the ADC bus (laptops still use ADC internally, hence the power button). However, these key combo's do the job:

      Option-Command-Eject: Sleep
      Control-Command-Eject: Restart
      Control-Command-Option-Eject: Shutdown

      (lucky those modifier keys are right next to eachother ;))

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
    4. Re:There's no point in including PS/2 by AC-x · · Score: 1

      I don't think there's been a Power button on Apple keyboards since they used the ADC bus (laptops still use ADC internally, hence the power button).

      Actually the USB G3 towers had powerbuttons on their USB keyboards (for some reason they took them off the newer keyboards, much to the dismay of our graphic designer).

      Infact you can actually get several usb dongles that plug into the keyboard and provides a power button

    5. Re:There's no point in including PS/2 by displaced80 · · Score: 1

      Ah, thanks for that. I had an inkling I might've been wrong!

      Incidentally, for those questioning the position of the power button, the reason it's on the back of the Mac Mini (as well as tucked away on the side of the eMacs, and the rear (IIRC) of the sunflower iMacs) is that Apple see no reason to shut down a desktop Mac entirely. For the most part, they're right. Sleeping the system's much more convenient. Just use the menu, or let it sleep after an idle time-out. Wake by hitting a key.

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
    6. Re:There's no point in including PS/2 by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1
      When I connect my Apple Pro USB keyboard to my PC, the Command key maps to the Windows key, Option maps to Alt, and (unsurprisingly) Control is Control.
      Hmm. Assuming that the reverse mapping also applies, how would I get Command out of my deliberately-Windows-key-free keyboard (a Model M clone from Unicomp)?
      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    7. Re:There's no point in including PS/2 by displaced80 · · Score: 1

      The famous Model M! I completely understand not wanting that Windows key. I'd still go without too, but the temptation of Bluetooth was too great :)

      Anyway, it certainly looks like it's possible. Get a $4 PS/2-to-USB adapter, then install the GPL tool, DoubleCommand (SourceForge Project], Homepage) There's a stack of options there for altering key behaviour.

      Heh. I quite like the idea of a tiny Mac Mini with a nice clunky retro keyboard. :)

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
    8. Re:There's no point in including PS/2 by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      Here's another question, from the happy owner of an old-but-not-too-old IBM keyboard: which key on the Windows keyboard would map to the 'eject' key on an Apple keyboard? Obviously there's no eject button on the computer itself.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    9. Re:There's no point in including PS/2 by sebi · · Score: 1

      There are two possibilities. It might be F12 or there might not be an eject button. But you don't need one. Since the drive is slot-loading you don't need to open it (which is what the eject button really is for). Discs already in the computer can be ejected using various methods in the finder (click the little eject icon next to every removable medium in Finder windows, drag the icon of the thing you want to eject onto the trash can in the dock, use 'File: Eject' in the Finder.)

    10. Re:There's no point in including PS/2 by poobie · · Score: 1

      F12.

    11. Re:There's no point in including PS/2 by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Logitech keyboards have both PC and Mac markings on the keys.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    12. Re:There's no point in including PS/2 by displaced80 · · Score: 1

      ... and for completeness' sake, you can also right-click (yes, right click) or control+click a drive's icon and choose Eject from the contextual menu.

      You might manage to thoroughly bork the system, and can't get into the OS to eject the disk. In that case, power on the Mac and hold the (left) mouse button down immediately after the startup chime. Keep the button held, and the disk will eject.

      There's a couple of other ways... boot into single-user mode and use the 'eject' console command. Or drop into OpenFirmware and type 'eject' there. There's many many ways to skin this particular cat.

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
  159. Interesting price comparison by Rick+Genter · · Score: 1

    I am in the market for a new desktop Mac (my 1999 vintage lime iMac DV just isn't as snappy as it used to be :-). I priced a Mac mini configured with Airport Extreme, Bluetooth, a wireless keyboard/mouse, 1GB RAM and 80GB HD. With AppleCare and a 20" Cinema Display it came to $2500.

    I also priced a 20" iMac G5 similarly configured (I didn't go to 2GB of RAM, though I usually max out my RAM, and the smallest HD I could configure was 160GB HD). With AppleCare it came to $2400.

    I've decided to go with a maxed out 20" iMac G5 (faster, newer generation processor, more RAM, bigger HD), but with RAM from Crucial (from Apple 2GB = $925, from Crucial it's around $500).

    --
    Don't underestimate the power of The Source
    1. Re:Interesting price comparison by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      That means apple have got it about right in my eyes.

      You're a power user... you want 20" monitor, maxed out RAM, etc. At your spec, apples fastest machines are the best value.

      For me, who's looking at my first mac, the more I spend is more wasted if I decide I don't like it, hate OSX, or whatever. I want cheap, functional. The mini is better value for me.

    2. Re:Interesting price comparison by TinyManCan · · Score: 1
      I would imagine that that is what Apple intended you to do. Look at it from their perspective. They sold you a single piece with a high margin, instead of two seperate lower margin items.

      Apple still got almost the same amount of money out of you, but spent far less to do it. Less shipping, logistics, retail space, wharehouse space, etc.

      The pricing is correct. If you are a power user, Apple shuffles you off to the nice high margin iMac, if you can't afford, or don't want that level of performance, they will still take a buck or two off you while dishing out the Mac mini.

  160. I'm too sexy for a mac, too sexy for a mac, too .. by bushboy · · Score: 1

    Ok, I lie, I'm an ugly troll with an ugly biege box that makes TONS of noise and has cost me an arm and a leg over the last 2 years. (I now type with one hand and have a special chair so I don't fall off it)

    That shiny little anodised alumium something-or-other-pound square lump that looks like,er, a square metal lump is just so sexy !

    I wan't one !

    But wait, I'm too sexy for a mac, to sexy for a mac, to have a real mac attack !

    troll mode off ... idiot hat off ... normal service resumed ... ugly beige box will self-destruct in 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  161. It's so small because... by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...because it doesn't have an internal power supply. It uses a power brick. The power brick is the size of a washing machine and requires three-phase power.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:It's so small because... by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 2, Funny
      The power brick is the size of a washing machine and requires three-phase power.
      On top of that, it requires being plugged into a retro encabulator.
  162. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suck on it Euromonkeys!

    I mean hell, it is one of our 3 items we export.

    More importantly, has anybody checked the price of Guinness in Cupertino lately?

  163. Re:In an attempt to put some news into this story. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

    There's some doubt whether installing RAM could void your warranty. If you do it right then I don't think they'd be bothered as long as the fault wasn't related.

    http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?selm=BE0A26D9. 19 FCC%25OhNoSPAM%40pacbell.net

  164. Customs import duty by CountBrass · · Score: 1

    Customs import duty: something pretty much everyone seems to forget about. VAT is not the only tax applied to imported goods.

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  165. VAT and Customs. Duh. by CountBrass · · Score: 1

    Apple have no control over how much VAT and import duty gets applied to their products.

    And if you can't afford the Mac you want: tough shit. I can't afford Aston-Martin but you don't see me whining about it every opportunity on /.

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    1. Re:VAT and Customs. Duh. by section321a · · Score: 1

      Computers are duty free... everywhere in the civilized world. VAT's another story and it varies country to country in the EU. They should sell it for EUR499 and pocket the gain on the strong euro.

  166. That's ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could do that same thing for a cheap Windows PC and the "hardware portion" would end up costing you next to nothing. Your logic is flawed and amazingly idiotic. The only reason you get Insightful is because the Apple zealots need someone to burn their mod points on who supports their cause.

  167. iPod mini 5 GB? by Tow_cow · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know what happened to the rumoured iPod mini with 5GB?

  168. media center by ArgyleAgent · · Score: 1

    I don't know if they intentionally did this, but apple seems to have missed a major opportunity here. If they had thrown s video on there and created some kind of media center software, people would be scooping these things up like hot cakes. 500 bucks for a Media Center computer that has the smallest footprint / energy requirements / noise output and looks great? Oh, well... perhaps Mr. Jobs has a plan for us all.

    1. Re:media center by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking of making it into one. Combine this with Elgato's Eyehome box. The only problem I can see is external firewire harddrives. Pretty expensive. I've already got a linux box that I guess I could install a bunch of internal ide 300GB hard drives into. This wouldn't be quite as expensive. And then just use the mac because the eyehome only works with mac.

      My hunt for an elegent solution to storing all my dvd's on my linux box to be served to tv's without having a dedicated PC in my family room continues.

    2. Re:media center by ArgyleAgent · · Score: 1

      well you could always keep your files on a seperate server, I just want a box that is quiet and space saving and then I'll remotely connect to my movie dbase

  169. pictures of the internals ?? by wwwillem · · Score: 1

    Anybody that has seen pictures of the internals??

    --
    Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
  170. No one thinks of the simple problems by jeromemode · · Score: 1

    I'm not a big MAC user but I do appreciate their products. I see a big simple problem with this MAC. They only provide you 2 USB ports and to use the modular design without bluetooth you need to plug your mouse into one and your key board into the other. Now how am I supposed to plug my digital camera in?

    1. Re:No one thinks of the simple problems by mike3k · · Score: 1

      Get a USB hub. Very few computers have more than two USB ports, so you're expected to use a hub. Also, Apple's USB keyboards have a built in hub, so you connect the mouse to the keyboard instead of the second USB port.

    2. Re:No one thinks of the simple problems by dadman · · Score: 1

      In case you didn't notice, there are two extra USB ports on every Apple USB keyboard.

      Better though, use Bluetooth.

    3. Re:No one thinks of the simple problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats funny, almost any new MB(within the past 6 mo to year) has 6 USB ports(USB 2.0 also) mine included... Thats just in the rear most also have USB headers on the MB to connect to the front of the case....oh wait you must be talking about Apple products. I know! you can just replace your MB with one that has more USB and a new CPU to boot! oh wait you must be talking about Apple products..... cant do that......

      Now I know why I dont buy Apple products.....

    4. Re:No one thinks of the simple problems by dmdimon · · Score: 1

      Don't you really know that USB is a CHAINED bus? With tree-like topology up to 64 (or 256?) devices from ONE port?

      Stupid.

  171. DIMM or SODIMM? by kajoob · · Score: 1

    Are you certain it's a DIMM? I'm asking. I looked at all the tech specs but couldn't find it. It's such a small form factor that I figured it'd be a SODIMM like the imacs had. I hope you're right and it's DIMM 'cause they're cheaper. Where do you see that it is a DIMM?

    Also, I guess it only has one slot? As has been mentioned here before, the price for the 1gb stick on Apple's site is indeed overpriced, it'd be worth cracking the thing open and putting your own in there.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
    1. Re:DIMM or SODIMM? by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Mac mini interior shows the RAM stick is about 6" wide, it looks like a DIMM to me.

    2. Re:DIMM or SODIMM? by astrodawg · · Score: 1

      If you looked at the tech specs, should have seen this:

      256MB of PC2700 (333MHz) DDR SRAM, supports up to 1GB

    3. Re:DIMM or SODIMM? by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      More importantly look at all the little white hooks sticking up in parallel - presumably to grab hold of the top of the case and keep it on. Gonna be a mothafarker to get that thing apart without a specialized Mac'cracker.

      But yes, it looks like a regular SDRAM.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    4. Re:DIMM or SODIMM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get SODIMMs that are 256MB in size, run at 333MHz, are DDR, and you can get them in 1Gb sizes (presumably). So that really doesn't answer the question at all.

  172. Re: A brave new world by Rafe_Goo · · Score: 1

    Well, sadly your only a Gamma Minus Moron so you only get am old "Windows PC", only Betas and above can get the new "mini mac"

  173. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by GtKincaid · · Score: 1

    taking into account the german MWST which is 16.9% remember this is over the bass price which is still alot more than the price of the base american unit. so that kind of mutes the point of the VAT
    take a look at the imac g5 the 1.8ghz model. this is nearly 500USD more expensive in germany. 33% import tax , i think not. being very liberal with an estimation i would say they are charging a 15% premium atleast

  174. Re:On the off chance someone hasn't mentioned this by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not so obvious...

    I'm sitting here on a laptop - non-upgradable (I hear they're selling quite well nowadays...). All my PC boxes are being migrated to shuttles (which aren't very upgradable, TBH, but I don't care).

    *most* people don't keep the same box going for 5 years. They upgrade. Slashdotters are more likely to do it bit by bit, but I bet the average slashdotter has spent a lot more than $1000 on hardware in the last 12 months.

    The things that I upgrade most (memory, hard drive) are still upgradable on the mini, albeit with a little work... but you get that with laptops too.

    99.99% of the 'real world' never upgrade. Heck, they never even run Windows Update let alone upgrade their hardware. This is the market these boxes will fly off the shelves in.

  175. Fixed link by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

    Need the dubyas in there.
    http://www.cappuccinopc.com/

    --
    Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    1. Re:Fixed link by DrWhizBang · · Score: 1

      thanks. next time i will use copy-and-paste, not retype-and-assume.

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
  176. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

    because then he'd have to buy region 1 dvd's if he wanted to watch a movie on it?

    --
    May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  177. Daughter by hey · · Score: 1, Troll

    This is exactly the kind of thing I'd buy for my daughter -- one big problem! Its not PINK. Clashes with her color scheme.

    1. Re:Daughter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give them a year. They'll probably make color options then just like w/ the iMac and other products.
      The sides are aluminium so it can't be that hard for them to introduce colored anodized aluminum like the Mini iPod features.

      And I'm sure someone will go out and reanodize it as soon as they figure out how to take off that body part anyways, creating a mini industry in moding before Apple brings out new colors.

    2. Re:Daughter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude! Never heard of Rustoleum (tm) ?

  178. Re:In an attempt to put some news into this story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just buy a bluetooth USB dongle if you need it.

    You can get external wireless, too.

  179. Mac Mini = Good, Sun should copy this approach by georgep77 · · Score: 1

    What we in the nerd world need is for SUN to bring out a low cost, small, quiet, reliable OPTERON/Athlon 64 box with their JAVA DESKTOP preinstalled.

    Nuff Said.
    _GP_

  180. Coming soon to a Slashdot article... by phillymjs · · Score: 1

    I'm betting it will only take a month or two once the mini becomes readily available, before some crazy case-modder type stuffs the mini's guts into an open 5.25" bay on their Windows PC.

    ~Philly

    1. Re:Coming soon to a Slashdot article... by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      It's a little tall for a 5.25" bay (2" vs. 1.5"), but I bet some Mac fanatics will buy gutted Cube cases off eBay and mount the Mini vertically inside them...just line up the drive slots and you're set.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    2. Re:Coming soon to a Slashdot article... by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      The case is 6.5" x 2", but I figure there's gotta be a little breathing room inside it. They might have to take the guts out of the case and work some magic, but it might be doable.

      ~Philly

  181. Pictures here by littleghoti · · Score: 1

    They only show the outer and the motherboard, not how it all goes together. I'm not sure if the beast is fanless, or takes a standard sized HD
    http://www.macnews.de/gallery/thumbnails.php?album =16&page=1

  182. unwrap an iBook, break the case: mini Mac by gelfling · · Score: 1

    I've always said that there is no coherent reason why almost every PC or Mac can't be half the size of a laptop computer. This is what Apple did and it's kind of brilliant from a manufacturing, design and engineering perspective. You take a laptop, remove the screen, battery and keyboard, modify it slightly to move the connectors, repackage it in a plain box and voila! Instant new device!

    You can add memory, plug in everything and you can change keyboards and screens at will, just like most people use laptops at home with docking stations anyway.

    I'm sure that my Lenovo Thinkpad could be turned into a cheap machine using the same process. In fact if I never wanted or needed to upgrade the RAM on the machine, which is actually the case, there is little, besides the CDRW, in my little Lenovo that couldn't be packaged in a power brick sized cable. The entire machine could be a power cord, a fat power brick/PC unit, a bunch of USB connectors, a network cable (or not - just wireless), a USB keyboard mouse and a screen of somekind.

  183. Re:wow by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

    If the Mac mini is the stupidest thing you've ever seen then you REALLY should get out a bit more.

    You're gonna piss yourself when you see a car with downlighters!

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  184. Go get a job at Whataburger by amichalo · · Score: 1

    In the the time spent arguing the sub $100 price difference between the Mac mini and the XYZ from Company PDQ, you could have _earned_ enough money to buy whichever you like.

    If a theoretical $50 is all that is stopping you from choosing a complete PLATFORM for managing your digital life, er iLife, then you have missed the point or are just being an ass.

    Plus Apple is giving away FREE SHIPPING - OMG, get out your calculators and factor that in!!!!!

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  185. And the design is equally old news ... by karlpell · · Score: 1

    http://www.mini-itx.com/news/nanode/

  186. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

    That's the dumbest thing I will see all day.

    People are petitioning Apple to lower their prices because a government body's TAXES give Americans an unfair lower price? Pre-VAT the prices are not that unfair. It's not Apple's responsbility to eat losses due to your government's taxes. It's your government's duty to you to not screw you by increasing your costs on goods.

    --
    Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
  187. Name change by PeanutGallery · · Score: 1

    Yeah, "mac mini" according to scale, but according to actual dimensions and color, I think "Big Mac" may have been a better name.

    Anyway, how 'bout somebody developing a multi-up rack for these puppies, so we can get a clean little G4 Mosix cluster going on. Kafoom!

    --
    -- Just another unsolicited opinion... from the Peanut Gallery.
  188. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Additionally, I remember seeing some of the GB people posting that theirs was working out cheaper (GBP) than the US pricing was. Go figure.

    • Mac mini US price: 599 USD
    • Mac mini UK price: 339 GBP

    Take away 17.5 percent VAT from UK price:

    • Mac mini US price: 599 USD
    • Mac mini UK price: 288.52 GBP

    Convert to US dollars using XE.com rates (1 GBP = 1.88196 USD / 1 USD = 0.531361 GBP at 15:13:38 GMT on Jan 13th 2005):

    • Mac mini US price: 599 USD
    • Mac mini UK price: 542.98 GBP

    Looks like you're right.

  189. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by eclipser_of_macfinit · · Score: 1

    plz read that article/petition again. the pre-VATs are unfair. furthermore, any government is only part of the economy, but that's politics :D

  190. News: /. slower than mainstream paper press by jridley · · Score: 1

    (OK, I know the ORIGINAL story beat the papers, but...)

    There was an article with pictures in our NEWSPAPER yesterday. Sheesh.

  191. Still too costly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    499 sounds great but I would not buy one nor recommend one. Simply put, it is still about $150 over-priced for what they are offering.

    Memory costs are an issue with this machine as everyone knows 256 is laughably too little.

    Me, I would throw 500 at a new big lcd monitor before throwing it on a PC that I had no intention of making my primary.

  192. No... by siskbc · · Score: 1
    We're getting unconfirmed rumours that President Kennedy's been shot. Can anyone clarify this?

    But Stephen King was. Found dead in his Bangor, ME home. Truly an American icon.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  193. Time is worth much more than hardware by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

    My time is worth 20-120 dollars an hour, depending on the client and what I'm working on.

    The time I save in ONE HOUR of not having to remove spyware, virii and other crap from various members of my family's computers (I, being the family geek, am the default repair guy, and of course I have to do it for free, taking time away from playing with my niece and nephew and interacting with my family) is well worth the paltry few bucks I'll save by getting them a POS Windows machine. What are you smoking, dude? You are totally missing the point of this thing.

  194. 9" monitor needed by bitmanx · · Score: 1

    If apple would just release a 9" black/white monitor to sit on top this you would almost have the original mac...)

    1. Re:9" monitor needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say! That would be a great project - put the whole box inside a gutted Mac Classic case (with build-in CRT display) - have a 1.2-1.4 Ghz G4 classic!

  195. Exclusive Rumor! by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    I heard Apple is switching to a BSD based operating system!

  196. Another thought: Xserve Blade? by phillymjs · · Score: 0

    Just a thought, I wonder if Apple have any future plans to stuff mini-like innards into a blade and whip up a rackmount enclosure to hold several of them?

    ~Philly

  197. A Real Dell compare: to a laptop. by guidryp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since this machine is a luggable and uses Laptop components. I thought I would compare a low end laptop.

    I configured a low end dell laptop with 40G drive/ CD-RW/DVD combo drive/256 MB ram/Celeron 2.6./90 day warranty (7.5 lbs) Price $852

    I configure the mac Mini with standard 1.25 G4/ 40G drive/ cd-RW/DVD combo/ 256ram/ 90 day warranty. 2.9lbs mac mouse and keyboard combo. Price $552
    CMV 15" LCD Monitor 5.3 lbs $179 newegg.
    Total Price: $731

    So one is luggable on the other true portable. But you have similar power and price/size/mass. Upgrade capability and pricing also similar.

    Those comparing the price performance to a off the shelf standard PC are out to lunch. This is not a power users box. It is not the best price peforming box on the planet.

    What it is is a very small cool, REASONABLY priced mac.

    I never used a mac before but I could see KVM'ing one of these into my current setup. I could meet 90% of my computing needs in blisfully quiet operation, keeping the PC for powerhouse/legacy tasks the other 10% of the time.

    I think they are going to sell all they can build. I would have ordered one already if it came with digital audio outputs.

    While not everything to everyone, this machine has an interesting niche to occupy and represents one of the few chances to get an Apple without paying a significant premium IMO. I wish them well. Hopefully they will be successful and release a mini2 that is more suitable for media center usage.

    1. Re:A Real Dell compare: to a laptop. by hattig · · Score: 1

      Even if you price compare to a low-end Dell desktop, the Mac Mini comes out quite well priced, and it is about 1/10th the size. Sure, a 1.25GHz G4 won't compete in terms of computational power even with the 2.6GHz Celeron that was the lowest option on the Dimension 2400, but the Dell used really really shitty integrated graphics that'll impact on the performance. Of course, you have to take the cost of software into account - Macs come with tonnes, the Dell doesn't, or has crappy versions, and then a virus checker ...

      I'd have liked a front USB and Firewire port though, for the iPod shuffles and iPods that people will be getting/have.

    2. Re:A Real Dell compare: to a laptop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're comparing an Apple to a Dell. Are you kidding? Trolling perhaps?

    3. Re:A Real Dell compare: to a laptop. by keytoe · · Score: 1
      90 day warranty
      <pedantic>
      Actually, every piece of Apple hardware has a one year warranty. The 90 days is for free phone support.
      </pedantic>
    4. Re:A Real Dell compare: to a laptop. by guidryp · · Score: 1

      " Even if you price compare to a low-end Dell desktop, the Mac Mini comes out quite well priced, and it is about 1/10th the size. "

      I agree. Just getting tired of the this generic box PC has more horsepower/buck. So I thought I would compare to something using similar components.

      This is a highly price compettive Mac to anything in its size class.

      This would be the perfect computer for my mom for instance. Right now she is using and old PentiumPro of mine with 64MB RAM/ and 15G HD space and she will never need an upgrade. NEVER. There are millions of people that could use this Mac mini. The power user portion of the population is in the minority. If you want to email/surf/wordpro /productivity and play music, this will serve you for years and that is all that most of the population does with computers.

      If I won some money I would buy a stack of these and give them out to family/friends. They are just so cool.

      Once I got my nforce MB with soundstorm integrated, I swore I would never buy another computer without decent integrated digital sound and I am sticking to that. So they missed me, but they are going to sell a bundle of these and hopefully mini2 will be a bit more media ready for me and have some ports on the front for you. :-)

    5. Re:A Real Dell compare: to a laptop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      laptops come with LCD screens.

    6. Re:A Real Dell compare: to a laptop. by hattig · · Score: 1

      Someone did some simple maths.

      The Mac Mini is 1/8th the volume of a Shuttle SFF system.

      ONE EIGHTH! Sure, it has a power adapter as well, but that isn't much more.

      So when I said you could get 10 Mac Minis in a Dimension 2400, I probably meant that you could get 30+! That is a massive difference.

      I'm going to wait for the mini2 like you though. The lack of audio input is a bit of an oversight in these Skype, etc, days. And what sort of DVD player doesn't have optical audio out? Especially one with DVI out!

      That, and I too have an nForce2 system with soundstorm, and even though it is nearing 2 years old it is still scarily competitive with new computers. I'm scared I won't have an excuse to upgrade for a couple more years!

  198. The *real* WoW question! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How servicably would the Mini run WoW?

  199. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "i've never been a mac user (does an apple IIe count?)"
    well jesus fucking christ, is IIe the same word as machintosh? no, it's not you fuckstain. go fuck yourself. you're not a mac user. you're an apple IIe user you douchebag. go fuck yourself asshole.

    you had sex with osama bin laden.

  200. Not a dupe, though a bit late. by hph · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That other story was about that whole Apple event. This story is about the Mac Mini. See the difference?

    1. Re:Not a dupe, though a bit late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, what a brave moderator.

  201. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

    Look at Apple's website. The pricing for the Mac Mini is on par with all other Mac pricing standards on the German Apple store.

    Apple is doing nothing wrong. Furthermore the petitioner is pretending that selling an item in the U.S. incurs the same costs as selling something in EU, which is dead wrong. Shipping costs, selling costs, advertising costs, etc, are all different. I can't even begin to fathom how unions in the economies over there cause everything to be more expensive than necesary.

    --
    Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
  202. Free Mini Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get your free mini mac here,

    http://www.freeminimacs.com/?r=13908694

  203. If your time is valuable... by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

    Time is worth much more than money.

    Think:
    No spyware to speak of.
    No virii to speak of.
    Hardly ever a security patch reboot parade.
    Plays nice with others.
    Does most things you'd want to do on a computer, except for a few modern games that only exist on PC's.

    I hope they sell a sh**load of these, and I hope that all of you get one for auntie, and granny, and your brother-in-law, and Mom, and basically anyone that you and I know will be asking *US* for free tech support. And lots of it, if it's Windows. You know it, I know it... Hell, I do it.

    Your time is as valuable as mine. Even if you can get a stripped-down Dell for a hundred or so less... Even if you can build your own for almost 200 less... Time is money. "Time is hydraulic". It's the only permanently finite resource you have. Don't forget. Don't waste another second running AdAware. Take a walk on the wild side. Try a Mini on for size.

  204. Re:wow by schizacopf · · Score: 0

    One thing that Apple should have realized by now is that a closed solution is NO solution. I guess maybe it is good as a cheap low-end consumer product. But the ramifications of no expandability and limited upgradeability will out way any of the pros for this product.

    This product is already legacy. As Apple is pushing G5 solutions and will always strive to progress in the computing industry, this Mac Mini is in reality a regression of the current Mac consumer product line. G4's are falling out of the profitable markets and should be considered by Apple as legacy or so-to-be-legacy.

    Apple should realized the life-expectances of their products and release them accordingly. Maybe 2-3 years ago, this would have been nice. But as for today, lets see Apple stay in their market and release a G5 Mac Mini.

    PS. I've been using Macs for a very long time. I have followed Apple and still purchase their products. I was not really trying to bash them... just a little over exaggerating. If I wanted a $500 G4, I would jump on ebay or gsaauctions.gov

    That's just what I think... I don't really fucking care anyways!

  205. It allready exists by Uninen · · Score: 1

    Imagine a mac mini. Add a battery pack. Add wireless option. Throw it in your backpack.

    It's called PowerBook.

    1. Re:It allready exists by settsu · · Score: 1

      We all WISH you could milk that performance from $499.

      Actually it's called iBook.

  206. Can you say ClusterX by nmd_sb · · Score: 1

    HMM, time for some Knoppix clustering over firewire.

  207. Mac mini vs. Dell Dimension 2400 (fully detailed) by BlueDjinn · · Score: 1

    I went with a $600 shootout instead of $500 to make sure that some obvious add-ons were included with each model, but the new Mac mini holds up surprisingly well!!

    $600 Desktop Apple/Dell System Shootout

    (This is a repeat of my post from the original story, but then again, so is this story, so there ya go!!)

  208. Re:Internal or external power supply? (and a fanta by pizero · · Score: 1

    It has an external power supply. If you look at the QTVR of the mini, you can see the power brick behind the mini. It looks to be ~ 6" x 2" x 1 1/2".

  209. Play Games? by Dekks · · Score: 1

    I'll go fetch my coat...

  210. Re:How will it react to "Windows" iPods? by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

    I hope this thread isnt cold, this needs to be answered. i was going to get a mac mini but now I'm concerned about my ipod. any mac gurus out there?

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  211. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    Well, a slight dupe from my last post on the mac mini...but, with new questions.

    I thought originally at $500 a pop, this would be great for clustering a few of them. Stack a closet full of them. I read about Apple's Xgrid..looks interesting.

    However, I guess I'm confused about what clustering is/does. I was hoping by 'clustering' say 2 or 3 of the units...I'd have the equivalent of a 2 or 3 processor machine...so, all things I did would run faster. But from reading...it looks like only specific jobs you submit to Xgrid run in a clustered mode.

    What I was hoping, was that when doing common jobs, like rendering something, or decrypting a DVD...creating iso's...etc...that all things I did would be run faster using all the machines together. Can this be done, or is it only specific jobs submitted to the cluster that will have it work?

    If it would work like a multi-processor machine for all activity, then $1500 or so for a 3 way box would be a pretty good price!

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  212. Re:Here's another one. by bdowne01 · · Score: 1

    You too are completely missing the point. Sure, you can rattle off technical specifications that easily exceed the Mac Mini, likely at a better performance to cost ratio, sure... you could. But after you turn on the machine and use it I'd bet that the extra $50 or so spent on the Mac is well worth the time and frustration saved by having to usually worry every other day about Windows updates, virus updates, or spyware updates and whether or not someone snuck something on your PC. Case in point: A customer I visited had a Windows XP machine with precisely 643 pieces of spyware (according to AdAware) and four viruses. This person is not a computer person, just needs it for work and email. Is the extra $50 spent worth eliminating all the time and confusion she went through the months before I visited and fixed it (for the time being)? You betcha. Could she have saved $150 by not having call me? Absolutely. Once hardware nerds realize that computers are for actually *getting work done* and not about raw performance is the day they become Mac addicts.

    --
    -brain
  213. Only one of these fits in my pocket by CapnGib · · Score: 1

    Ok maybe not in my pocket, but the mini would fit in my pocket if I wore cargo pants.

    --
    Beauty is truly in the eye of the tiger
  214. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI: It's "moot point" not "mute point".

  215. where's the screen? by modoquasi · · Score: 1

    I see a trend. First the IShuffle. Now this. I think Apple is trying to tell us that a user interface with a screen is too complex. Use the (I)force, user. Let go.

  216. Macs and KVMs by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Any reports from people using the Belkin KVM switcher that Apple is selling?

    I am using a Belkin 8-port USB KVM switch right now on my desk, with a G4 Gig-E, a Quicksilver G4, a G5, and several Windows boxes. I also have one plugged into five Xserves.

    If you can do without holding down keys on startup, they work fine.

    If you need to hold down the odd key for startup options (Shift to start up with reduced service count, Option for the Boot Manager, cmd-opt-P-R for PRAM clear, cmd-opt-O-F for Open Firmware, cmd-opt-S-U for single user mode, T key for FireWire Target Mode, C Key for CD Boot, N Key for NetBoot, or cmd-V for verbose boot) it will not work through the KVM, and you'll have to plug directly in via USB.

    Also, if you are using the Apple Pro Keyboard, the eject key won't work, and you'll have to use F12. Don't know if the volume keys work, as I am doing systems engineering, and don't use sound on any of my Macs except my PowerBook.

    I've never gotten a good answer from Belkin about the startup key sequences or the eject key thing...

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  217. not just 499 by bdbolton · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I watched some CNET videos of the unvailing of the mac mini. Everyone cheered when the price of $499 was shown. But you know thats not the whole price. Did he not think about mouse, keyboard or monitor? Looking at the back of the imac I dont see anywhere I can plug my VGA monitor? Oh and were do I plug my ps/2 mouse and keyboard? These are still standard inputs for new computers.

    He mentions that this computer will encourage people to switch. I have three reasons for not doing so:

    1)Usually it is only new computers that will have a usb keyboard and mouse. If I already have a new computer why buy another?

    2)If I had an old computer I would have to by all new input and output devices to hook up to this thing because older computers are less likely to have usb mouse keyboards and VGA/DVI monitors.

    3)I went to the apple site to "buy" one and I don't even see monitor as an option to add to this computer. Sure I can buy a 20inch LCD from apple but then its not "just" $499 anymore is it?

    -brian

    1. Re:not just 499 by rjstanford · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1)Usually it is only new computers that will have a usb keyboard and mouse. If I already have a new computer why buy another?

      USB-PS2 adapter, Fry's, something like $2. Seriously. Basic USB keyboards/mice aren't much more if you feel like an upgrade.

      2)If I had an old computer I would have to by all new input and output devices to hook up to this thing because older computers are less likely to have usb mouse keyboards and VGA/DVI monitors.

      It comes with a VGA-DVI adapter in the box. Moot point - oh, and RTFA.

      3)I went to the apple site to "buy" one and I don't even see monitor as an option to add to this computer. Sure I can buy a 20inch LCD from apple but then its not "just" $499 anymore is it?

      If you add extra parts it gets more expensive? Er, yeah, you're right there - although I don't really see what your surprised about. If you want a monitor, add one to your cart. If you don't, don't. If you want the whole package, spend more and get an eMac or an iMac. Or don't. Is this really rocket science?

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    2. Re:not just 499 by bdbolton · · Score: 1

      "Is this really rocket science?"

      No, its not rocket science for me. But for most Neophytes it is.

      But maybe thats no who apple is targeting...

    3. Re:not just 499 by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      No, its not rocket science for me. But for most Neophytes it is.

      But maybe thats no who apple is targeting...


      Actually, it is. They're just targeting them with the iMac, not the miniMac. For an all in one system for people on a moderate income, the 17" iMac is pretty sweet.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    4. Re:not just 499 by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

      No, its not rocket science for me. But for most Neophytes it is.

      I'm not sure I'm a Neophyte, but will I need to also purchase a soldering iron to link all of these contraptions together?

  218. Media center bluetooth keyboard/mouse? by amichalo · · Score: 1

    Okay, I have been looking around for a good keyboard/mouse combo to allow me to use a Mac mini as a Media Center computer for PVR/iTunes.

    I am wanting something inexpensive, preferably rugged incase it is dropped. Must be wireless, preferably bluetooth, and perferably a single unit.

    I want to be able to sit on the sofa with a keyboard in my lap and use OS X for launching/navigating iLife applications. I am not trying to have a workstation for cutting iMovies, just want to be able to manage an iTunes playlist or import some digital photos. Nothing too fancy.

    Please offer your advice/experience/opinions!

    Thus far, I have found the following:
    Wireless Mobile Keyboard - Developed by Motion Computing and offered at $150, this bluetooth all-in-one keyboard/mouse is meant for TablePC users, but looks like the best offering I have found thus far for my purposes.

    Media Center Remote & Keyboard - a $180 offering by Gyration is not Bluetooth but includes an interesting pointing device that looks like a large remote control and uses a gyroscope to point the mouse on the TV. This offing is specifically for media centers.

    diNovo Cordless Desktop - This $250 Logitech 'system' does not have an integrated mouse but apparently the detached calculator pad functions as a remote control and has an LED screen. I believe much of the functionality may be Windows Media Center/XP only.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  219. Deceptively inexpensive by Theovon · · Score: 0, Troll

    They tout their low $499 price, but the base model looks woefully inadequate for modern computing tasks. In order to get it up to snuff, they'll nickle-and-dime you to death, and it won't be inexpensive anymore!

    By the time you get everything in that you need, you're probably looking at closer to $1000. By that point, you could buy a PC that's twice as fast!

    Still... I've always wanted to have a Mac. It really is a superior design with a superior OS and superior software. I was thinking of buying an iPaq, but now I'm thinking about buying this instead.

    1. Re:Deceptively inexpensive by ByrneArena · · Score: 1

      To get it to a Gig of memory, superdrive, and add wireless you get yourself well over the $1,000 mark. So Amem on that one Theovon.

    2. Re:Deceptively inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repeat after me... the people at which this machine is most directly targeted DO NOT NEED this machine maxed out to use it effectively.

      The only thing I would do to the stock low-end configuration is bump up the RAM to 512MB, which is enough RAM to make Panther happy.

      Apple's marketing people aren't dumb-- they've priced this thing so that people who see how much it would cost to max it out might look at a low-end G5 iMac and say, "Well, for $x more we can get this." You know, just like $x more than the cost of an iPod mini got you five times the capacity.

  220. Woa Woa PC's have bundled software too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget every PC you buy comes with 9000 Free hours of AOL, Earthlink, and Verizon.

    Plus all those icons for deals on Quicken and other performance-reducing trialware.

    This is important stuff, I don't think Macs come close in this regard.

    1. Re:Woa Woa PC's have bundled software too. by TheBillGates · · Score: 1

      Yeah, where's the Bonzai buddy on this mini? Dammit, I want my spyware!

  221. Re:In an attempt to put some news into this story. by MKalus · · Score: 1

    Bluetooth most likely not (neither Airport) I think you have to order it that way because it is a completly different Board.

    That's one of those things I didn't know when I bought my last iBook, so now I am still using a Bluetooth Dongle.

    Oh well. Lesson learned.

    --
    If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  222. Re:Internal or external power supply? (and a fanta by antdude · · Score: 1

    It is external. I saw one of the photographs from an Apple store near MacWorld that showed this. I don't remember where it was. I cannot check since I am on dial-up and I need to log off soon.

    Maybe someone else know where it is.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  223. Digital Audio OUT lacking by scrtchy · · Score: 1

    If only it had a DIGITAL AUDIO OUT, it would go onto my AV rack this month.. Does anyone else share the same sentiment?

    1. Re:Digital Audio OUT lacking by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      yep me too, but you could always use one of these

      http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/SonicaThea te r-main-1.html

    2. Re:Digital Audio OUT lacking by Moofie · · Score: 1
      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:Digital Audio OUT lacking by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I just bought a used Pod XT off eBay PodXT ...it has midi in/out. Could the m-audio products like this firewire interface be used hooked to the mac mini for input of guitar...etc.? I'm a noob guitarist..and very noob to how midi and computer capture works...but, if this would work...would be a neat setup.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Digital Audio OUT lacking by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Yeah it could, but if I were you, I would wait till Apple releases their Asteriod breakout box, its supposed to cost around $150 or so and have lots of audio inputs available.

      http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2004/11/200411230 12 226.shtml

    5. Re:Digital Audio OUT lacking by shippo · · Score: 1

      No. The PodXT only uses MIDI for programming Amp modelling and effects settings, and for updating the firmware.

      You can use the USB port on the POD XT for Digital recording off the XT, though.

  224. Be careful by fr0dicus · · Score: 1

    This slashdot editor is the same idiot who will give away your personal details without a second thought. Nice to see he's idiotic enough to post a dupe of one of the biggest stories of 2005 already.

  225. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

    because then he'd have to buy region 1 dvd's

    Which isn't exactly a bad thing. Many DVDs are released as region 1 before they are released for other regions, if they are released for other regions at all. I think region 1 DVDs have the widest selection.

  226. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

    Well, this answer isn't Mac specific, but what you are looking for is single system image (SSI) clustering. There is a project for Linux sponsered by HP that does this -- you set up one box (preferably with a shared drive -- firewire or scsi), and network boot several others connected to it via private high speed etherenet interconnects. It then runs special code that lets process on one box migrate to un-loaded boxes, so that the whole group of them will look like one big SMP system.
    See openssi.org, also check out mosix / openmosix.

  227. Re:Internal or external power supply? (and a fanta by evangellydonut · · Score: 1

    lol yeah, if you lug around a 1000VA UPS weighing in at something like 40lbs, you'll have a nice "portable" computer...

  228. Great *NIX Workstation / Desktop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You hear of Linux trying to hit the Desktop, but it's not controlled yet.

    Apple can hit the market with this MiniMac alone and totally take the advantage.

    I mean has all the 'basic' *NIX tools for a user's workstation. With the 'casual' feel of Windows.

    Spread this out like wild fire, then have Apple & Sun team up.

  229. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by SparafucileMan · · Score: 1

    you are really, really retarded

  230. Does it come with a Fortran compiler? by altnuc · · Score: 1

    (yes I'm trying to be funny)

    1. Re:Does it come with a Fortran compiler? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, it only comes with C/C++/Objective C/Python/Ruby/etc. Fortran you have to install it separately: http://developer.apple.com/hardware/ve/fortran.htm l

  231. Does it have a notebook HDD though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want one, so cheap and I will finally have something decent to run OSX on (my old clamshell iBook is a bit slow with OSX). However, if this thing has a notebook HDD, I hope it is one of the 24/7 models designed for server blades, because I like to know my desktop machines can be used a lot without fear of worry about duty cycles and such.

    BTW, remember when Apple used Mini Me to advertise the 17" Powerbook? I wonder if they'll use him for this? I will call him, "mini Mac".

  232. Charle Bronson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Charles Bronson is dead !

  233. Re:How will it react to "Windows" iPods? by minimunchkin · · Score: 1

    It will work fine. The only difference is that it will show up on the desk top as a generic disk marked 'ipod' rather than as an ipod shaped icon. Oh and you won't be able to boot off it - though I don't know why you'd want to. You can still sync with it and use it as a disk.

  234. Re:How will it react to "Windows" iPods? by minimunchkin · · Score: 1

    This is not true. I've got a 40g windows formatted iPod synched to my powerbook just fine.

  235. So, let me get this straight.... by Electric+Eye · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I submit a story of newsworthiness and get rejected. you guys pick up a story from two DAYS ago after the entire world has already heard about it and post it? You guys suck.

  236. Re:MACS SUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finnaly, a man who speaks the truth

  237. This computer is not for ... by zpok · · Score: 1

    people who don't want to switch anyway. That seems to mean you buddy.

    Keyboard: ps/2 have never been Apple standards, however, a ps/2 to usb costs next to nothing and can be bought virtually everywhere. Cheap USB keyboards and mice as well btw.
    VGA/DVI: VGA adaptor included. Read instead of looking at pretty pictures. Think Playboy.
    screen: if you want to buy cheap, you don't want to buy an Apple monitor. They are superior quality and expensive. Buy another brand and plug it in. Oh and about that superior quality, read some PC reviews, don't trust a mac-head. It's astonishing how cheap you can go, especially over the internet, even flat screen.

    In short: three seconds of actual using of da brain would have given you these answers. This computer is for people who want to switch, or are in the market for a second machine (hence the advertising for a switch box) or a media centre.

    I repeat, this computer is not for people who don't want to buy it. Have a nice day, brian.

    --
    I think, therefore I am...I think.
  238. Digital Audio OUT lacking by scrtchy · · Score: 1

    If only they included a DIGITAL AUDIO OUT, I would have to get it for my AV rack. Without DIGITAL AUDIO OUT, it doesn't quite make it as a Media Center.

  239. Re:Mac mini vs. Dell Dimension 2400 (fully detaile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can a newer Dell 3000 (the one referenced in the shootout was a 2400) with an 80GB drive for $429 from Dell right now with a 2 year on site warranty and free shipping. Considering this fact, I find it hard to believe the reviewer made an honest attempt to truely compare the offerings. In fact, you can get almost the same system I referenced above from Dell with a 15in LCD for $564. Subtract the LCD, add a DVD and or speakers and it is still much cheaper. Links here.

  240. Such Old News by theManInTheYellowHat · · Score: 1

    Come on. I got an email yesterday from MacMall and was seriously impressed so I went to /. to see if it had been reported and discussed and sure enough, there was an artical from the prevous day. So I did not post an anouncement.

    Then there is this one 2 days late.... Perhaps the poster should have checked as I did. Or better yet who approved this obvious dupe?

    However, the gizmo is worthy of its own discussion and is quite cool.

  241. Unbiased Opinion by Timtimes · · Score: 1

    Sweet. Enjoy.

    --
    This ain't no upwardly mobile freeway This is the road to hell
  242. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by jdray · · Score: 1
    If you read the above-referenced info on openMosix, you'll find a lot of useful information on clustering.

    Essentially, traditional clustering gives you the ability to distribute jobs or services across an array of servers. But the code has to be written to accomodate that. Most workstation-based applications (DVD rippers, word processors, etc.) aren't architected this way. Think instead of database servers that, in the event of a hardware failure on one node, fail an instance over to another node and maintain all the transactions that were just written on the failed server. You may lose a session or ten, but most of your data is safe. Also think of distributed processing systems like SETI@Home. Redundant images of calculation code run on a wide variety of servers. One server (the job boss) has the task of distributing calculations to the rest of the systems and collecting the results.

    I think the Mac Mini is a great contender for grid computing, except that it's missing a high-speed interconnect. If it had a gigabit Ethernet interface with iSCSI offloading or a Fibre Channel port (neither of which would have any use to the common end user), it would make a good grid node. An expansion slot would have taken care of this, but that adds to the cost, and you have to engineer that into your design.

    --
    The Spoon
    Updated 6/28/2011
  243. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by rjstanford · · Score: 1

    Alternately, take the UK price (339 GBP) and convert directly into US dollars (638 USD). Divide 638/599 to reveal a 6.5% difference, which is probably typical of US sales tax rates. Texas is a little higher than most because we don't have a state income tax (just the Federal ones).

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  244. Imagine a beowulf cluster of these! by cmoney · · Score: 1

    had to be said. but seriously, imagine if you could have a backplane and plugging in an additional mac mini could increase the performance of your total system. great for lowering the barriers to entry while giving a path forward and almost nickel and diming your customers.

    1. Re:Imagine a beowulf cluster of these! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could actually fit 100 of these comfortably in your room!

    2. Re:Imagine a beowulf cluster of these! by sodaquad · · Score: 1

      For the price of one PowerMac dual G5 you could buy six Mac minis. 256Mb is plenty if you strip out OS X and replace it with Linux or Darwin. Ethernet is already there. If you have huge data to process it might even be the sensible option, wouldn't it?

  245. My Newton spidey sense is tingling.... by ianscot · · Score: 1
    This is essentially the next generation of the cube, but at a time when the market is ready for it, and with the right price point...

    Let's see -- the market wasn't ready for it, and the price point wasn't right: Yep, sounds like the original Newton to me.

    Personally I think of the Mini as much more of an aggressive market expansion move than an evolution of the cube, in terms of where it sits as a marketed product. The cube was supposed to be a BMW of a computer, or that's how I remember it being pitched to me. But you're right, in terms of the design this is just a natural extension of the principles behind the cube. The market caught up with the idea.

    And if that's true here, why isn't it also true for an Apple PDA?

    Personally I've never gotten a Palm, and the main reason is that I think the designs out there are crud. (Devices that require me to re-learn how to draw the letters of the alphabet -- now that's a major obstacle to adoption.) If Apple was to release a slightly pricier PDA that was designed dang well, would the market for that already be saturated? Open question. I'd consider one, I know that much.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:My Newton spidey sense is tingling.... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      The stand alone (non-phone) PDA market is dying. There will continue to be a market for things like the Palm Treo and Windows Smart Phones. Unless Apple wants to get into the Phone business, I don't see that they would have a product.

      For one thing, in order to do a PDA/Phone right, they would need an OS that is appropriate. The Newton OS was great, but they don't have it anymore. OS X is not appropriate to put onto a Phone.

      Second, the margins on Phones aren't that great. There are way too many competitors in that market. The designs change too quickly for Apple to recoup an investment in a really kick ass design.

      I just don't see this happening.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    2. Re:My Newton spidey sense is tingling.... by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      Not to mention a whole 'nother world of US and interntional telecom regulations they'd have to adhere to or not violate.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    3. Re:My Newton spidey sense is tingling.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Newton suffered from one thing: John Scully. The guy didn't know how to make computer gadgets. Jobs does. He's known how since the AppleII.

      Apple didn't try to outdo the Palm, probably, because the Palm did it right. Why hurt Palm when there's WinCE attacking it?

      The person who started the thread really didn't "get it". Apples were always made by computer enthusiasts for non-enthusiasts. They were never meant to appeal to geeks, except inasmuch as it bridged the geek world and the rest of the world.

  246. A macintosh XBoX? by nanoakron · · Score: 1

    Anyone thought of this as an apple XBoX? Firewire based pads?
    DVI to TV output?

    Maybe re-pack it and sell as a panther based competitor to the 'Phantom'?

    Ho Ho.

    -Nano.

  247. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many DVDs are released as region 1 before they are released for other regions, if they are released for other regions at all.

    Many DVDs of North American movies are released as region 1 before they are released for other regions. If your preference is movies from other parts of the world, having a region 1 combo or superdive may limit your selection.

  248. Clash? How? by Little+Brother · · Score: 1
    Looking at the pictures of this box, I can't really imagine it clashing with ANY colour scheme. It is semi-reflective (like most mac stuff these days) so should pick up ambiant colours and its base is white, which is almost as good as black for going well with ANYTHING. If you really want to, you could take pictures of your daughter's room and send them in to some interior design company, along with a downloaded image of the mac mini, and get an official consultation (for a price) but I'm pretty sure that whatever colour scheem she has, the mac mini won't clash.

    Oh, and if, somehow, it does, it is very easily concealable.

    No, I don't work for apple.

    No, I'm not gay either.

    --

    Little Brother, watching the watchers

  249. Mac Mini is a real Bargain by ajius · · Score: 1

    I have read a lot of postings since tuesday afternoon about this new machine, and while most people love a cheaper more affordable Mac, a lot of people are deriding it as still much more expensive than the competition for what you get. I hate to break this to you but you guys are wrong wrong wrong. You can't really compare the Mac Mini to the Dell Dimension on features and say that the Mini comes up soooooooo short. The Dimension is a tower, the mini is btx or subbtx sized. For those of you that haven't priced them, a Shuttle PC carries a huge price premium over a similarly configured PC in a regular sized case, a mini-ITX based machine even more so. I spent the better part of a month pricing out different solutions (buy it, build it, etc.) that would allow me to put a pc in my Jeep(in the glove compartment, in the CD changer slot, in the dash, etc.), and I can tell you that for what the Mini provides...for ALL that the Mini provides(including form factor, a noiselessness)...I think it may be the cheapest thing on the market.

    1. Re:Mac Mini is a real Bargain by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      It is indeed, even if you go for the self building route on the mini form factor / mini itx formfactor you end up pretty much at the same price using the worst components in existence currently for the PC...

      Have been looking into various miniITX solutions for the last year, if you go for prebuilt you can call yourself lucky if you can get barebone hardware with a good thermal design for less than 800USD if you need something at the same speed at the new Mac you pay around 1000-1200 for the hardware alone on the PC side.

      The instant I saw the price tag of this thing and saw that a G4 was in there I hit the buy button. All the screamers face it, the mini Mac currently is one of the cheapest silent PC solutions on the market currently in existence and also one of the fastest (only Centrino based ones are faster)

    2. Re:Mac Mini is a real Bargain by ajius · · Score: 1

      Not to mention little to no need to mod the case
      it's current enclosure is perfect for being in-dash,
      for going in the entertainment center, and hell
      for even going in my bookbag.

      I am certain I can get snort working on this thing,
      so I will need it for my work(network consultant),
      my hobbying, my media center, and my car.
      I am basically going to end up buying like 4-5
      of these things over the next year probably.
      And then of course once my brother-in-law sees
      how my Mini + elgato +Myth outperforms
      his $1100 HP Media Center, but looks
      better on my entertainment center,
      he is going to end up doing the same thing.

      Don't even get me started on the shuffle...
      A starter ipod/datakey????
      Are you friggin kidding me? Awesome.

  250. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "Well, this answer isn't Mac specific, but what you are looking for is single system image (SSI) clustering. There is a project for Linux sponsered by HP that does this -- you set up one box (preferably with a shared drive -- firewire or scsi), and network boot several others connected to it via private high speed etherenet interconnects. It then runs special code that lets process on one box migrate to un-loaded boxes, so that the whole group of them will look like one big SMP system. See openssi.org, also check out mosix / openmosix."

    Thank you very much...that helped clear up the difference for me. I went and looked, and it appears the mosix and openmosix are for the x86 architecture only. I couldn't find in a quick browse of the openssi site if it was chip specific.

    Do you now if openssi will work on the ppc? Are there any ppc specific projects out there for Single System Image ? If so, I'd think the mac mini would be a shoe in to build one...

    Again, thanx for explaining the difference to me...

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  251. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by drew · · Score: 1

    for most applications you wouldn't get anywhere near the same benefit you would from having an equivalent number of processors in one machine, due to the much lower communication bandwidth between the cpu's. even gigabit ethernet doesn't compare to the bandwidth that processors in an smp system have access to, and i'm pretty sure the mac mini only has 100 mbit networking. given the right setup, you could probably run multithreaded applications spread accross several computers, but the performance will be less than stellar.

    typically the applications that benefit most from clustering are ones that involve a lot of highly paralellizable steps- operations each computer can perform independently of the other computers without having to communicate with the other computers until they are done. common examples include cg rendering and certain classes of large mathematical problems such as factoring large numbers. other examples would be brute force searches a la distributed.net and seti@home, or distributed compiling of large projects (e.g. gentoo's distcc). however, the more times your problem requires one node to access data that resides on other nodes, the worse your performance is going to be.

    in short, just because you are running multi-threaded applications doesn't mean you can expect a properly configured cluster to compare performance-wise with an 'equivalent' smp machine.

    --
    If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  252. DOES NOT VOID WARRANTY by LanMan04 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Dude, you can install your own memory in ANY Apple computer and not void your warranty. If you break something, it's not covered, but you are free to install your own memory or HD or other "user-servicable" part, it's just not "recommended" by Apple. Believe me, it's true.

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
    1. Re:DOES NOT VOID WARRANTY by justins · · Score: 1
      http://www.apple.com/macmini/specs.html

      The relevant part:
      Memory upgrade must be performed by an Apple Authorized Service provider.


      So no, I don't believe you.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    2. Re:DOES NOT VOID WARRANTY by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Well, consider me stupid. I'm really suprised by that move, historically Apple's been very good about letting people do their own memory upgrades (which on the original Bondi Blue iMac was quite a challenge for Joe Consumer).

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
  253. I just want to know... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    What is the 'Security Slot' used for?

    (sounds a bit sinister, like the thing will bite me if I try to open the case)

    This could be my first MAC (I can see a beowulf cluster of these :)

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:I just want to know... by Rick+Genter · · Score: 1

      The Security Slot is borrowed from laptop designs. It's basically a hole that you can run a security cable through to chain your Mac mini down so it doesn't "walk away."

      --
      Don't underestimate the power of The Source
    2. Re:I just want to know... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      Ah - It just snapped when you said 'laptop'...and I am looking at one attached to my mini-atx workstation right now - lol.

      Not so sinister after all.

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  254. yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you suck

  255. Would it work for my media center? by Experiment+626 · · Score: 1

    An idea I've been playing around with lately is a small, quiet computer to use as a DVD server. Store all my frequently-watched DVD's as ISO files on USB hard drives. Admittedly, storing a lot of DVDs losslessly will be impractical until you can buy a 1TB+ external drive for under $400, but, not being one to let that stop me, I was hoping someone more familiar with the Mac's capabilities could help me figure out how well this box would stack up.

    First requirement, I need something that can handle really large files. FAT32-based systems for instance can't handle a DVD-sized file. I'll assume the Mac has a decent filesystem format.

    Next, I need to be able to mount the ISOs like a DVD. Windows has Daemon Tools, Linux has the mount command. Mac being BSD-based, things probably work pretty similarly in this respect to Linux.

    Now the hard part, good DVD playback software that can be controlled programatically (command line parameters, a documented API, whatever) to go to particular chapters, menus, and so on. WinDVD on Windows, for instance, doesn't provide much in the way of a way for outside programs to control it (that's documented anyway). Xine on Linux does, but the playback looks rougher and more pixallated, at least on my current system. Can anyone shed any light on how well Mac DVD player software stacks up?

    1. Re:Would it work for my media center? by RustNeverSleeps · · Score: 1

      I use my Mac (12" Powerbook) for DVD creation, and I've never had any problem with it handling large DVD files. Mac OS X has a program called Disk Utility that lets you create, mount, and burn disk images, along with a bunch of other functions like hard drive scanning/repair, partitioning, formatting, etc. Works great for me. I use it to watch DVDs I've ripped to the hard drive quite frequently. As for your question about DVD playback, I can't be a hundred percent sure, but I'm pretty confident you could use AppleScript to control DVD Player (the standard Mac DVD playback software). AFAIK, AppleScript will allow you to access UI elements from within your scripts, so even if a program isn't written to support AppleScript extensions, you can do it yourself by accessing the UI elements directly.

  256. Re:Better audio out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you kidding? Right on the accessories page http://www.apple.com/macmini/accessories.html is the link to a $100 Optical digital out and in! http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/Transit-main .html
    People who want/need better audio options can buy the accessories they need.

  257. We're actually sick of OSX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm really having difficulty swallowing how wonderful OSX is. After using it for several months on a free Mac, I had to go buy a PC to get my stuff done. It was the most awkward, slow, counterintuitive interface I've used (from windows to HP-UX to Linux to NextStep, etc). And I'm not alone. Is there some sort of shame in saying the emperor has no clothes? Sure, OSX is technically great. But if you dread firing it up, what's the point?

    Posting anonymously because the emperor has minions...

  258. (OT) Re:There's a petition for matching prices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't even begin to fathom how unions in the economies over there cause everything to be more expensive than necesary.

    Personally, I'm still trying to fathom how the lack of useful unions in the economies over here allow many employers to pay employees shit money, screw them out of their pensions and health insurance when they need it most, and treat people like sh*t.

    But we all have different priorities.

    I don't think there's a problem if a bunch of people want to sign an online petition that will be ignored by Apple. My attitude is, people don't need a Mac to survive. If they're pricing it too high, let Apple know and buy something else.

  259. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by JohnAllison · · Score: 1
    It is not about the difference in VAT. There are customs duties that raise the price; however, Apple's pricing scheme reflects their attempt to buffer against currency fluctuation.

    While the Euro has been worth more for the last two years, there is nothing guaranteeing that exchange rate will continue. Apple is hedging its bets. This is why the difference is higher for the Euro than Dollar. Same goes for the Brits.

  260. Re:wow by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

    If the Mac mini is the stupidest thing you've ever seen, then you really ought to get out a bit more.

    I mean, you're really gonna piss yourself when you see a car with spinners or downlighters, or watch some reality TV.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  261. Re:wow by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

    What the hell happened? I previewed it, Slashdot broke and it got submitted in BOTH editions?

    I can't see this being a big success with the mods...

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  262. Rose tainted glasses would be nice... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    if someone could put an elegant GUI on a robust unix kernel don't you think Microsoft or IBM would have done it already?

    Could you tell me the name of your prescription? I'm gonna ask my doctor for one : )

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  263. Understanding Apple by macpeep · · Score: 1

    Apple products are not just about the numbers in the spec sheet. They are not just about the price tag.

    Apple products are about the asthetics, the incredible high level of polish and the good feeling you get when you're using them. It's in every single detail of their products. It's in the hardware and it's in the software. It's in every layer of it: from the beautifully precision crafted aluminum shell on the PowerBook's with their perfectly cut power buttons, the led-light that pulses on & off in the same pace the average sleeping person breaths when the computer is in sleep mode, to the elegant Aqua graphical user interface in OS X, the brilliant Objective-C based Cocoa API you use to program it, the seamless integration of Java to the operating system, iTunes + the iTunes music store + iPods, the BSD UNIX core... It's in the millions of small details - everywhere in Apple's products. Every portion of the system (hardware + software) just works brilliantly. It INSPIRES YOU!! That's why Mac users are so passionate about it!

    All of that makes using a Mac just so much better of an experience than using a PC with, say, Windows XP. Even if you assume for a minute (and that's assuming a lot) that the XP never crashes and you manage to keep it virus and adware & spyware free. And don't even try to compare it to Linux. It will be cheaper to run Linux, for sure, but 99 people out of 100 will be a million times less inspired and productive with Linux.

    I've used just about any type of computer you can imagine. Apple IIe's, Commodore 64's, various Amigas, old generation Mac's, and just about any and every version of PC's and operating systems for them, starting with DOS 3.x versions on XT's and AT's, through various Linux, OS/2 and Windows versions with modern PC hardware. And when I tried a Mac with OS X the first time about a year ago, it was an incredible accute experience of "OF COURSE!! This is how it SHOULD be!! Why isn't everything like this?!". When I digged in deeper and started examining the guts of it, Carbon, Cocoa, the BSD layer, XCode, the ADC reference library, etc. it just got more and more clear how incredibly well designed and implemented the entire thing is!

    So when Apple releases a beautiful headless Mac for $499, you're making a major mistake if you just compare it GHz for GHz and $ for $ with PC hardware. You're not just paying for GHz's, USB ports and MB's of harddisk space. You're paying for a totally different level of experience and for feeling inspired with whatever you'll do with the computer.

    1. Re:Understanding Apple by thegnu · · Score: 0

      If you pretend that OS X doesn't crash, you're making as big a leap as those who pretend Windows doesn't crash. Maybe as a computer technician I have that special touch, but here it goes:

      On the OS X Jaguar disk (the second release of OS X), it contains the firmware patch for iMacs so that they aren't rendered useless upon install, but the installer makes no mention of it. This is a stupid mistake that someone who uses proprietary hardware ONLY, should not make.

      I've crashed the hell out of every OS X system I've used for more than a few minutes. Only difference between OS X and Windows XP? You can't blame the hardware. It's inextricably part of OS X because it's illegal to run Mac OS on non-Apple hardware.

      And a pre-configured Linux system can be easier to use, easier to update, and crash less than either Windows or OS X. The issue at this very moment is the same as Mac, hardware support. The problem is larger with Linux because the home/office install base is smaller for Linux than for Mac.

      That being said, I agree with the "What you're paying for is substance" argument. But then again, the people who are criticizing the iMac Mini are saying they hate having to pay for substance that doesn't do it for them.

      I'm not inspired by Mac. I'm inspired by Linux.

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    2. Re:Understanding Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      holy shit - fuck you.

      what a load of claptrap. i hate you more than i have hated anyone right now. i hope you get herpes from having sex with osama bin laden, you fuckstain. goddammit, do you even buy into all your bullshit? i know you spent a lot of time writing that comment and you were thinking to yourself, "man, i am so smart and i write so well." well guess what - you're nothing but a shitstain. fuck you.

    3. Re:Understanding Apple by macpeep · · Score: 1

      As far as crash proofness goes, I only put the computer to sleep. I don't shut it down or reboot unless some update requires it, I'm going on a long trip where I will not use the computer for two weeks, or similar. The time I have between reboots is thus typically on the order of months at a time and the stability has been absolutely superb. I'm running OS X 10.3.7, that is, the latest updated Panther version. So really, while some earlier OS X version might have been unstable, the current OS X seems quite stable indeed! Perhaps the hardware you were using was somehow broken? Faulty memory, heat issues due to broken fans, or something of that kind..

      Be that as it may, if Linux works better for you, then by all means use it. I never said people shouldn't. In fact, I believe strongly in using whatever works the best for you, no matter if that's closed-source Microsoft software or open-source stuff. Whatever works for you!!

      I was simply saying that for most people (I'd guess 99 out of 100), a Mac is SO much better of an experience than PC + Windows (or PC + Linux) is, that you'd make a mistake in just comparing it GHz to GHz and $ to $. It's the total experience you're buying there, and you can't easily put numbers on it.

      In any case, we'll find out in the coming months what the general public thinks about it. My bet is that it (the Mac Mini) will sell like crazy and will boost Apple's market share like never before!

    4. Re:Understanding Apple by thegnu · · Score: 0

      OK, I agree. I definitely am rooting for Apple at the moment (until they have 51% market share, that is ;-)), but I'm kind of a tinkerer/hacker/modder, so I have a hard time with things that I can't open up and break.

      I guess that sounds kind of funny. :-)

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
  264. Re:wow by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

    Like a lot of geeks, you seem to believe that all computers need offer maximum compute performance to have merit.

    They do not.

    Apple have been trying to engage the PC in the same market as other consumer appliances now for about 20years, and the closest they've got is the iPod.

    Personally, I'm considering using a mini as an underset Mac - equipped with Bluetooth, an S-Video converter and Salling Clicker, it should make a great living room computer sitting atop my Sony PS2.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  265. Engineering programs by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    There isn't any descent cad or analysis software. Don't bother with "Try Wizo-X." I'm talking analysis stuff where 1 gig of dual channel ram is barely adequate. And solid modeling. The OSX programs are niche and years behind. And from my research, emulation of a PC is not worth it.

    If OSX had come out 5 or 10 years sooner, all the workstation stuff would have been ported over. But Apple missed the opportunity. Now it's like the graphics market, but stacked against them.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  266. It is not expensive in the EU by terminal.dk · · Score: 1

    Take the base unit.

    3119 Danish Kroner (DKK) = Approx $555. So about 10% extra, which might cover some uncertainties on the $ exchange rate. I do not think it is bad. They need to pay for localization of the software, the extra support org etc.

    The bundle I bought is 5517,60 DKK = $981.
    This costs $871, so here there are slightly more expensive because the price of the parts has been rounded up

  267. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

    You can configure it for IP over Firewire. 3-4x 100BaseT perfrormance in reality.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  268. yes, on a $500 PC by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    Yes, engineers will put $10k of software on a $500 PC. We're an odd bunch. Personally, I take the money saved and buy another, faster computer a year later.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  269. Re:On the off chance someone hasn't mentioned this by fribhey · · Score: 1

    i completely disagree.... i have a sawtooth G4 that's 4-5 years old. i've added 3 hard drives, swapped out the dvd drive with a super drive, upgraded the processor with a faster 3rd party G4 processor, put in a new video card, added a firewire2/usb2 card and upped my memory to a gig and a half. you don't know about Macs much do you?

    --
    / http://suffocate.us
    / http://johngrayson.com
  270. Mac Mini is not fanless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mac Mini is not fanless.

  271. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    I moved to Oregon recently. We don't have a sales tax here. (It's really refreshing to buy something that is 19.99 with a $20 and get a penny back.)

    One reason that the these taxes aren't advertised in the US is that they vary from locale to locale. Often cities, counties, and states will impose differrent sales taxes. Also, if you advertise something with the tax, you can count on your competitors to advertise it *without* the tax.

    The one exception in the US is gasoline which is always (AFAICT) advertised with all taxes factored in.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  272. Re:bitch all you want, would a headless Dell have. by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

    Xcode has something called AppleScript Studio which seems like Apple's answer to Visual Basic. Despite the fact that it is a great tool for rapid application development, it doesn't seem to be widely promoted and there doesn't seem to be many books out there specifically on it. There is only one book on Amazon.com at the moment, and for some reason it hasn't been released, even though I ordered a copy months ago. I found an interesting page a while back, describing how it could be used to make weblog application with the combined features of a simple word processor and FTP program very easily, which is why I became interested in it in the first place.

  273. No Digital Audio out. by guidryp · · Score: 1

    I use a clunky 3 year old Nforce based computer as my media center. My first thought was great an awesome media play center and Mac, clean simple and not too expensive.

    But it has no Digital Audio out. You can pay another $100 for it, but I wouldn't. I will wait for mini2 now or get a XPC.

    I think they missed a bunch of us by leaving out DA out.

    Still think it is value for money and a cool package, but that critical missing feature was the main factor on my not buying one.

    I have no idea what the file system can handle, but when I rip my DVDs to the HD I used DVD decryptor and it leaves me with Vob Files no bigger than 1G each. Centainly work with Fat32/OSX or any other modern file system. Though I don't yet know if there is a decryptor for the Mac or a Player that will play them directly.

    But anyway they left out Digital Audio, so no DD/DTS. Grrrrrr! Where is that Apple suggestion box.

    1. Re:No Digital Audio out. by nsayer · · Score: 1

      If you look at the accessories page for the mac mini, I believe in the third row they list a USB audio dongle that does optical I/O, and does it at 96 kHz / 24 bit, no less (or will do 5.1, including take 5.1 from the DVD Player). It would have been nice if Apple had done the same thing with the headphone jack they did with the AirPort Express, but since this is intended to be an entry level machine, I'm not particularly offended that they didn't, particularly since it's an easy thing to remedy if you want/need it.

  274. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "in short, just because you are running multi-threaded applications doesn't mean you can expect a properly configured cluster to compare performance-wise with an 'equivalent' smp machine."

    Wasn't looking for the equivalent performance...but, for a cheap system..that was a reasonable facsimile as far as performance goes...would be nice.

    Not to mention, just a fun thing to toy around with. I think it would be nice to have, to do, say video conversions with a Myth box, etc...have it running transcode in the back ground for the MythTV box...

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  275. Not a dupe by loshwomp · · Score: 0

    Clearly this isn't a dupe -- it's merely confirming the rumors those "MacWorld" folks started.

  276. Re:How will it react to "Windows" iPods? by Moofie · · Score: 1

    I use my Windows-formatted iPod on my Powerbook. There is one gotcha: You have to do firmware updates from a Windows machine, and I haven't yet figured out how to keep my Mac from pestering me about them once they're available on Software Update. I'm sure there's a way, but I haven't found the button yet.

    Incidentally, contrary to what the other poster mentioned, you can change the iPod's icon. However, the volume label must comply with FAT standards, so it's all uppercase no punctuation.

    I haven't tried booting off of it, but I'm guessing that if there's a blessed system folder on it, it'll work fine. I'll have to do a 'speriment...

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  277. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by Moofie · · Score: 1

    Gosh. We pay more for BMWs in America than you do in Europe. C'est la vie.

    (That's French.)

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  278. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    I am going to get seriously busy with tchuladdiass's recommendation, but I wanted to point out that you are describing a RAIC (redundant array of inexpensive computers - my term) and as you hoped, when doing common jobs like rendering something, decrypting DVDs, creating iso's ... etc, it is faster IF your task load is easily shared.

    Ripping one DVD and compressing it to an .avi or VCD? Not easily shared.
    Ripping six DVDs and compressing them to .avi or VCDs? Your RAIC scales linerarly in performance (ie. add a box, go twice as fast. add three boxes, finish in 1/4th the time.)

    Get a 4-way KVM switch with audio port (the one with built in cables would be slick if it used USB connectors on the ends of the cables) and one real nice keyboard, mouse, and display.

    It won't get you higher frames per second in a single job (game or DVD rip or whatever) but for serious multi-tasking it makes a big difference. In effect you have to handle the task assignments but once that is done you are all set.

    I do this at home with four Wintel boxes (talked about it in my Journal a few months ago) and it works well enough to keep them set up.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  279. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    Lack of GigE was the first thing that brought me back to reality - it doesn't mean I still won't buy one (or more) but I put my Visa back in the wallet for now.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  280. Pimping the Apple by DemENtoR · · Score: 1

    Guys I like Apple's products (now the company is a diff. story, and please don't try convince me). But can we please stop pimping every single little apple product, 5 times in a week. Thanks.

  281. Seems like a bargain... by tgibbs · · Score: 1

    The software alone is clearly worth $500, and it's nice that they throw in that cute little computer as a bonus.

  282. Oh no... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    Flame ON!

    No really, other than the sound component, you're right. Too bad MHz wasn't yet a quantifier of speed since the Atari was 79% faster than the C=64. And let's not talk about disc drive speed.

    Better marketing killed the Atari, plain and simple.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:Oh no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and my Amiga was waaay better than your Atari ST.

  283. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by hattig · · Score: 1

    $499 = £265

    £265 + 17.5% = £311

    Apple UK Price: £339 inc VAT.
    Apple UK Extra Price = £28 inc. VAT.

    Oh no. £28. That could be extra cost at customs, who knows. It isn't as bad as other Apple markups.

  284. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by taniwha · · Score: 1
    In most other countries tax is (often required by law) INCLUDED when people quote prices for things - the US is the one that's different in this respect.

    The petition appears to simply be doing the right thing and be taking that into account so that they are comparing err um 'apples and apples'

  285. Missing a couple of things by swb · · Score: 1

    1) A CableCard compatible TV tuner with HD support. I would have bought one yesterday for this alone.

    2) Digital audio out.

    3) Component video out (perhaps not needed if your TV supports DVI).

    4) SVideo/composite video in.

    5) Inlcuded remote control that drove a decent "iTV" application that could do basic Tivo-like functions.

    1. Re:Missing a couple of things by nsayer · · Score: 1

      1. As soon as ElGato comes out with one, you'll be able to plug it right into the firewire port. For myself, I plan on trying the EyeTV 500 with it. In theory, there isn't enough horsepower to display 1080i, but I have some hope that since I'll be outputting 720p instead of 1080i, it might work. Quicktime 7 (Tiger) might eventually help as well.

      2. There is a $100 USB dongle on the mac mini accessories page that fixes that. It will even let you get 5.1 audio from the DVD player out to optical.

      3. ATI has a dongle that clips on to their DVI ports that gives YPrPb, but I'm 99% sure they use a driver hack to redefine the RGB output on the analog pins to YPrPb. It would indeed be nice if Apple were able to do something similar. From where I set, it looks like an awful lot of people are repurposing this machine from the entry level 'switchers' machine to the home media machine. I'm really, really surprised that Steve didn't talk more about this idea. This *can't* be a surprise to them, can it?

      4. ElGato, again.

      5. ElGato, again. Though for my part, I think using a remote control to talk to a computer is underpowered. For my mini, I got the full Bluetooth thing going on. I'll do some bad woodworking to lash together a bt keyboard and bt trackball in one unit. Now *THAT* will be a remote!

  286. In other news... by damyata · · Score: 1

    ... Intel announce their brand spanking new 386 processor.

  287. Re:bitch all you want, would a headless Dell have. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AppleScript isn't that fantastic, If you want to do rapid application development Cocoa is really the way to go about doing it. I've never made anything that had a GUI before and I had a pong program working in an evening. ObjectiveC + Interface Builder is an awesome combination. Or Java if you're so inclined.

  288. Re:Dupe, but... by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 1

    I ordered one and the Mini will be here before the Shuffle will be...

    --
    Your Average Joe
  289. Obsolete the day you get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, obsolete hardware for only $500. What a steal.

    1. Re:Obsolete the day you get it by TracerJPN_USMC · · Score: 1

      obsolete? man, i'm typing this on a g4 700 mhz imac. I am buying a mini mac as soon as i get my tax refund, as well as a new powerbook. This "obsolete" hardware does everything a computer needs to do, unless you are a game junky. i can be ripping cds, downloading music on limwire, chatting in ichat and browsing slashdot at the same time with no slow down. at 700mhz. these mini macs come in at over 1 gigahertz. more than enough for joe blow to check email and browse the web.

      --
      magnanomous.
    2. Re:Obsolete the day you get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree. i am using an 867MHz G4 12" Powerbook daily for editing photos, using Powerpoint, web surfing, and iLife '04. No problems here. Only issues with the Mac mini the way I see it are the fact that self-installing RAM voids the warranty and that the HD is near-impossible to upgrade.

  290. Re:wow by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

    This does not come with keyboard or mouse, and you CAN use a VGA monitor, or whatever you want with it. The video output is a DVI connector, but a DVI->VGA adaptr is ~$15UDS.

    Froogle search for DVI to VGA adaptors

    --
    -William
    God is everything science has yet to explain.
  291. Nice they have it, but... by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

    I think it is great Apple is trying to get into the lower price market. However after reviewing the mini-Mac and also following the posts here, it does nothing more than confirm my essential problems with the Apple Business Model and product offerings.

    1) Close Hardware - Little or no Upgrade abilities
    2) You are stuck with what they decide you can have (Mic jack, line in, and several other things most people would find essential)
    3) Poor performance. Yes I know that on some tests the G4 at a lower MHz does more than an Intel or AMD at the same MHz, however, even in the world of Macs, the mini specifications are low.

    Apple is a company that tries to make money out of glitz rather than providing true solutions. It is time they move past the 'cute' and esthetic innovations and instead start innovating and providing HIGH END features into their products that once made Macs 'high end' systems.

    (Don't flag me as an Apple basher; I simply want Apple to produce Macs that are more worth of what the original Mac revolution stood for. Back then, Macs not only offered stuff that was hard to find in the x86 market, but features and tools that didn't even exist. There is NOTHING in a Mac or OSX that you cannot find on a PC, and usually at a better price or even better quality. - This is a sad time for Apple. Only the Fan boys and Girls that don't know any better are going to put this product on a pedestal once again and buy it because it is cute and cool. This is not the Apple that I original fell in love with when Mac actually meant cutting edge graphics and features.)

    The only place I can see this product having use is in development labs that need cheap Macs for testing software or testing Web sites.

    Again I am truly saddened; I want Apple to be the graphics leader again, the ones that have all the gadgets that push the computing world. Instead they are still playing catch up with cheap x86 systems and Open Source OSes and yes even Microsoft Windows.

    Bottom line, there is nothing a Mac can do that a 'often cheaper' x86 PC running Linux or WindowsXP cannot do. In fact most people here can list numerous things you can do a WindowsXP system or a Linux system that you just can't even do on a Mac.

    Apple no longer provides us with the innovative and cutting edge features we all once loved the Mac for and fell in love with.

    Sad...

    1. Re:Nice they have it, but... by Austin+Milbarge · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I have to agree with you. Apple has become sheek rather than innovative. Sure their OS is solid and they don't get infected with nearly as much spyware and viruses as a PC but thats because Macs are so sparse. It wouldn't make sence for hackers to write viruses for Macs. Not yet anyways.

      Understandably, most people don't care if they own an Apple or PC (let alone know the difference). They mostly want to surf the Internet and check e-mail. Apple is still too expensive for the average user and it doesn't have a huge software base. Sure Apple is getting a nice boost from the recent Windows spyware frenzy and the 2004 iPod boom but in the end it's going to take much more than spyware and an iPod to convince people to dump their PC and all it's software and switch to a Mac.

  292. Re:On the off chance someone hasn't mentioned this by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

    I think he was talking about THIS mac. I wonder if an used G4 tower might be a better deal than this, though. The ebay prices seemed a bit inflated last time I looked.

    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  293. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  294. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by ckaminski · · Score: 1

    for $1500 you can build a decent two-way Athlon XP 3200 box, perhaps even an Athlon64 machine.

  295. $500 for 1 Gb of RAM??!! by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1
    If this is true, then you need to spend $1000 for a Mac Mini with 1 Gb of RAM? You're shitting us right? You made a mistake right?

    Just imagine the PC you can build yourself with a thousand bucks. Of course, you wouldn't be at the forefront of fashion and bling. Oh wait, I forgot. We're geeks.

    1. Re:$500 for 1 Gb of RAM??!! by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      Of course, you wouldn't be at the forefront of fashion and bling.

      You mean those acrylic cases with blue/purple neon tubes and blue/purple LED infested components aren't the forefront of fashion and bling?

      http://www.xoxide.com/acryliccases.html

      I like the blue UV-reactive case with dragon etched sidepanels. Instead of dumping $500 for 1GB of RAM on the MacMini, why not get a liquid cooling system and put UV-reactive dye in the coolant so your tubing lines glow?

    2. Re:$500 for 1 Gb of RAM??!! by Psiven · · Score: 0
      You mean those acrylic cases with blue/purple neon tubes and blue/purple LED infested components aren't the forefront of fashion and bling?

      Umm, no.

    3. Re:$500 for 1 Gb of RAM??!! by Golias · · Score: 1

      If this is true, then you need to spend $1000 for a Mac Mini with 1 Gb of RAM?

      No, you need to spend $499 for the mini, $250 for the RAM, twenty bucks to have a dealer install it if you are a total chickenshit about warranties, and sell of the 256 stick for $50. Total cost, $699. Not bad.

      Just imagine the PC you can build yourself with a thousand bucks.

      Well, let's see. The Mac mini is two inches tall, and 6.5 on each side, perfect for my media console. It also operates at 22 db when the fan kicks in. Again, perfect for the living room.

      1 MB of RAM, as I said before, is $250. Now, that leaves $750 to build a kick-ass media-room computer with.

      If I'm looking for something as small and quiet as the mini, while still being able to drive all the media apps I want, $750 in the PC world buys me... let's see... add shipping costs... carry the three...

      Oh. Jack shit, that's what.

      I guess it's just remotely possible that the mini might be the right computer for some people. You know, people who want quality. Those sorts of folks. But hey, enjoy watching video files at full volume to overcome the massive rushing sound of the fans on your AMD shitbox. I'm sure you're much happier than I will be when I hook up my mini to the projection system via DVI cable.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  296. Shouldn't this be in the "No Shit, Sherlock" dept? by weekendgeek · · Score: 0

    What the fucking christ?

    How the fuck can a post that's posted less than 2 fucking minutes after the article is be god-damned redundant?

    Fuck you, stupid moderators!

    --
    It would be presumptuous to conclude that Americans have no right to know what is being done in their name
  297. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    You can buy $4 standoffs and stack mini-itx motherboards. then you're only paying $175/node. Unless your cluster computer requires a fancy alumnium and white plastic case. The Mac mini doesn't have a very fast cpu. I'm not sure your $1500 3-node mac mini cluster setup is even as fast as single cpu 1.8Ghz powermac G5, which is exactly the same price.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  298. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
    What you are looking for is SSI SMP (Single System Image) SMP. Your not going to get that on Mac OS X and Xgrid. You will get that on Linux though.

    Just out of curiosity, why would you spend $1,500+ on 3 or 4 Mac Mini's when you can get a Dual 1.8GHz G5 from Apple for $1,999.00? If you are going to spend that much, just get the Dual Apple and be happy ; P

    There are many types of clustering technologies which serve different types of needs. Normally when you stick a few computers together, you have a master unit that sends work "objects" to the other slave units. The slave units do the processing and send it back to the master that assembles the results. This type of setup works _very_ well for scientific processing.

    If you want to do rendering, then a Mac Mini may work well. Most rendering software allows you to setup other "nodes" that the main computer can off-load processing to. What application are you using for rendering?

    P.S. Creating ISO images is really just disk intensive and not CPU intensive. A 32 processor system is not going to create an ISO any faster than a 1 processor system. Creating an ISO image just comes down to how fast your disks are. If you want to create an ISO faster, get faster hard disks.

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  299. Perfect Set-top box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using either the DVI out for high-end digital TVs or the S-Video, this box is perfect for an entertainment center. DVD movie playback, ripping your collection to the 80 gig HD, storing all your music, putting on improptu slide shows, and even some wireless capable (net and keyboard/mouse) surfing at low-rez - hell - why not?

  300. Question for mac users! by claes · · Score: 1

    Can someone Mac-knowledgable answer these questions. I imagine this could be used as a media terminal in my living room. Apple sells DVI-to-video converters which should make the video output viewable on my TV. Lets play with the idea that I add connect the headphone jack to my hifi amplifier and add the bluetooth option so I can control the mouse pointer with my mobile phone (works well even in Linux btw). Can I in Mac OSX adjust font sizes, icon sizes and stuff enough to the OS usable on a TV, using my phone as the mouse? Mac should already be one-click-optimized and so on, right? What problems and obstacles do you predict?

    1. Re:Question for mac users! by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't be too hard -- you can set the Display preferences to use 640 x 480 or 800 x 600, so you get a low-res interface for your TV. Finder icons can be displayed at 128 x 128, which is ridiculously huge IMO. And if nothing else, you can use MacOS X's dynamic "Magnify the portion of the screen around the mouse" feature (for the visually impaired) to zoom in even further on your stuff.

      Granted, if you're used to running 1600 x 900 or whatever, this is a step backwards, but that's the limitations of using an antiquated NTSC TV instead of a good HD-compatable monitor or widescreen TV.

  301. Re:Internal or external power supply? (and a fanta by onpaws · · Score: 1

    Imagine... the iBook *mwahahaha*.

    Starting at $999. WIth both a display and a *gasp* rechargeable battery and wireless G =)

  302. Damn video card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple always likes sticking it to people. This would be a great unit except for the fact that this box has a 4x agp w/32 megs of ram.

    Basically larger monitors and higher refresh rates are going to take a beating. Perhaps if Apple put in something like an 8x apg, they could potentially sell larger monitors to the public.

    They do make some nice LCD monitors. But, alas, they want everyone to own g5's @3000 grand.

    O'well. Has anyone ever checked out a decent video card for the Mac's. They cost a darn small fortune. No, I don't anticipate this box for a gaming machine but have a 19 - 21 inch display with 1600x1200 or 1920x1200 would be nice.

    And yes, I would buy this box if it weren't for the damn video card. Its not like this box has huge upgrade potential but having a good display is something that Apple should consider.

    Its kind of funny, you can upgrade:
    Memory
    DVD
    Audio
    Wireless

    Come on Apple, no expansion slots, give atleast an 8x AGP. Those cards still cost a fortune.

    1. Re:Damn video card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet the 32MB card would drive that monitor just fine since you state you don't need it for games.

    2. Re:Damn video card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I would like to know is what size monitor / refresh rate can this card support.

      The larger OS X gets, the more Apple pushes GL and the card performance is going to make the box suffer.

      Keep in mind, OS X gets new releases kind of quick. It might not be for games but the GL performance is going to be hitting the card quite hard.

  303. It has a standard TV out capability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a dongle you plug into the back. It's not some expensive converter, it just exposes the composite output like the composite dongle you'd use on almost any modern PC card.

    They don't include it with the box so that you don't have to pay for it if you don't want to use it. It also allows S-Video, as any decent tv-out card would.

  304. Google cache... by MattHaffner · · Score: 1
    ...here. From that page:
    The performance gains and features supported by Core Image ultimately depend on the graphics card. Graphics cards capable of pixel-level programming deliver the best performance. But Core Image automatically scales as appropriate for systems with older graphics cards, for compatibility with any Tiger-compatible Mac.

    Now, whether "scales" means on/off or a real ramp in feature-itis will have to be left to someone with Tiger running now. :) Also,
    Supported graphics cards:

    ATI Radeon 9800 XT

    ATI Radeon 9800 Pro

    ATI Radeon 9700 Pro

    ATI Radeon 9600 XT

    ATI Radeon 9600 Pro

    ATI Mobility Radeon 9700

    ATI Mobility Radeon 9600

    NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra

    NVIDIA GeForceFX Go 5200

    NVIDIA GeForceFX 5200 Ultra

    These cards are available in today's PowerBooks, Power Mac G5s and both the 17-inch and 20-inch iMac.

    I agree that it's a shame they couldn't have snuck a slightly better card (or at least an option for one) in there to mach the processor power.
    1. Re:Google cache... by Senjutsu · · Score: 1

      That's what the requirements were, but with all mention of them removed from the site, there's some speculation that the CoreImage requirements are being tonned down in favor of higher compatibility (half their lineup, the iBook, the eMac, and the Mac mini, make use of the Radeon 9200 32 Meg card). A review of the list will reveal that the Radeon 9200 isn't significantly less powerful than some of the cards on it (the FX 5200 Go is about the equivalent in graphics power).

      The unifying factor among them all seems to be that they all shipped in Apple comps with at least 64 Megs of video RAM, which is a pretty steep requirement for desktop rendering. It's quite possible that they've found a way to knock that down in order to work with 32 Meg cards like the 9200.

    2. Re:Google cache... by pNutz · · Score: 1

      The unifying factor is pixel shaders--that's the hardware that Core Image takes advantage of. All of these cards have at least ps_2_0. I'm not that familiar with pixel shaders, so I'm not sure how difficult it would be to scale the effects down to the 9200's 1.2 (I think) shaders.

      --
      Death and danger are my various breads and various butters.
  305. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

    Many DVDs of North American movies are released as region 1

    Many DVDs like Japanese Anime that originate from Region 2 (Japan...) make their way into Region 1 releases, but not into other regions subsequently. This is one example I've come across in trying to get ahold of DVD titles. This is disappointing for someone who likes Anime, and who is not in Regions 1 or 2.

  306. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The DVI->VGA adapter is included. The DVI->TV (S-Video and composite) is not included (if you really wanted to use it as an entertainment center device and don't have an HDTV with DVI in).

  307. Hall of Fame by nacturation · · Score: 1

    Keep posting in the old story. Only about 100 more comments until the Iraq story gets ousted and this one makes the Hall of Fame.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  308. Re:On the off chance someone hasn't mentioned this by zpok · · Score: 1

    You are so completely right. I'm going to confiscate my father's, mother's, father in law's and aunt's mac, and I'll tell them to do it your way. Along the way I'll explain them the ins and outs of screwdrivers and from there move up to the other stuff.

    Why? Because I enjoy doing free support. Because I think a PC is its hardware, like a car is its engine. Because I've never upgraded my Macs - oh, wait a minute, I have.

    Anyway, we're talking about $500 for a machine previously geared towards professionals, and with an OS the other half of /. (those not already owning Apple portables) are dying to try out. So why not nitpick?

    And while I'm at it, I'm going to tell all those portable non-upgradeable computer people they're mad, MAD!!!! They should just equip their tower and monitor with wheels. What were they thinking?

    Thanks for clarifying this for me.

    --
    I think, therefore I am...I think.
  309. Mini Mac by itsnotthenetwork · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who got an mental image of Dr. Evil saying
    "..and I shall name him Mini Mac. "

  310. Re:How will it react to "Windows" iPods? by rjung2k · · Score: 1

    There is one gotcha: You have to do firmware updates from a Windows machine, and I haven't yet figured out how to keep my Mac from pestering me about them once they're available on Software Update. I'm sure there's a way, but I haven't found the button yet.
    I'm not at home and can't check it directly, but I believe you simply select the update from the list, then use the menu entry that says "Ignore this item" or somesuch. When you want to re-enable the nagging, use the "Restore all updates" menu item.

    Something like that. There are only four or five menus with Software Update, it's easy to check...

  311. Re:How will it react to "Windows" iPods? by Moofie · · Score: 1

    It's one of those things that annoyed me, but not enough for me to lift a finger to fix it. : )

    Thanks for the tip. I'll let you know what I find.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  312. Software only usable on the mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The software probably comes pre-installed and with a DVD of the hard drive image. this means you can only install the software on you Mac mini... ...I actually thought about buying a mini after Tiger comes out so I could get Tiger and iLife 05.... but it doesn't work that way :(

  313. Games - it should do fine with most by sjonke · · Score: 1
    You won't be using this mini-Mac for gaming

    That depends on what type of games you want to play. Will it play Doom 11 well? Maybe not, but it will be very capable of running MacMAME, which is pretty much all I play anyway. I currently run MacMAME on my relatively "lowly" dual-533 MHz G4 (MacMAME gets no kick from dual processors, so effectively it's a single 533 for MacMAME) and it can play almost anything available quite well. Obviously the older games work great and most newer games too. For some reason it doesn't do well with Puzzle Bobble 2, 3 and up (original Puzzle Bobble it handles fine), but it works great with, for example, Metal Slug 1, 2 & 3 (I haven't tried Metal Slug X yet) and pretty much everything else I've tried. And that's at only 533 MHz and with a Nvidia GeForce2 MX. The Mac mini specs blow my system away, so it should handle it all with aplomb.

    --
    --- What?
  314. Hm.. by cepler · · Score: 1

    Is there an echo in here?

  315. Re:$100 like I said. by guidryp · · Score: 1

    Yes I know, as I said in my post you can get a $100 add on to do this, but that is overpriced and kludgy for what I want to do.

  316. Re:On the off chance someone hasn't mentioned this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you start looking around, you'll be surprised to see how upgradeable Macs are. My primary computer is a 5 years old PowerBook G3. I upgraded the hard drive 3 times (from 12 gig to 20 to 60), I upgraded the RAM to 768 MB (when the limit was supposed to be 512), I upgraded the CPU (from a 500 MHz G3 to a 900 MHz G3) and I upgraded the CD/DVD Rom to a CD/RW-DVD combo drive.

    While its age begins to show (especially with the 8 MB RAM video card), it runs OS X and many apps (including GarageBand with virtual instruments, MS Office, iLife (but not iDVD), Quark XPress and most of the Adobe apps) all right. I have a X-Box for games but I still enjoy Diablo II (and it works just fine on it).

    Bottom line is: Macs can be upgraded and as an added bonus, they don't get obsolete as quickly (every Mac OS X version was significantly faster than the previous).

    Maybe a fairly high initial price tag but, IMHO, well worth it (incredible OS, nice apps, amazing support for standards, virtually no security issues).

  317. Mac Mini is cheaper, by far. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Logic Supply 3677 mini-ITX System
    - Power Supply Morex 80 Watt Power Supply
    - Operating System Windows XP Professional - English
    - Motherboard EPIA MII 12000 1.2Ghz
    - Memory 256MB PC2100/DDR266 RAM
    - Hard Disk 2.5" 80GB Hitachi 4200rpm
    - Color Silver
    - CD / DVD Drive TEAC DW-224E-93 Slimline CD-RW / DVD Combo
    - Build and test Build and test this system

    Total: $877.00

    Er.. Maybe the Mac Mini isn't so badly priced hmm?

  318. To all those this thing is overpriced criers by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

    Look at the machine. Really small form factor. USB2.0 and Firewire, good Unix per default, Linux runs well on it, it has a really low power consumption and it is basically noiseless (hopefully but the pics indicate it) You know what this thing basically screams silent PC and Homeserver all over it.

    Is it really that overpriced. I would say no, there are similar silent PC machines on the PC side of things. If you go for the 500-600 USD pricerange you end up mostly with something massively slower (C3 based) and lot less ports.

    Or even more expensive, you cannot find anything from Hush PC at that price and most of that stuff has huge heatpipes into the back to cope with thermal issues

    If you want something decent on the PC side of things in this area with around the same ram and hd configs you spend much more (Centrino based industrial solution which you cannot get that easy)

    There also are several vendors which sell stuff based on arm, that stuff is 700USD+ (looked into those options recently as well)

    Sorry to say that, but I have been looking into various options for such sleek homeservers which are silent and dont drain lots of energy and never though that apple would deliver one day the best bang for the buck.

    Of course if you want to have a run of the mill our fans are louder than the one of the other company computer which has labeled GHz monster all over it, you might be better off with a standard PC solution, but those beasts are dead awful if you either want something small and/or something which does not take a lot of power, basically something you want to turn into a home/fileserver with some extra duties.

  319. 8bits???? ha! by airdrummer · · Score: 0

    the ti99 was a 16bit machine...2x as good;-)

  320. Digital Audio out available over USB by jtrott · · Score: 1

    The even have it listed on the Mac mini accessories page http://www.apple.com.au/macmini/accessories.html

    Called the M-Audio Transit http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/Transit-main .html it provides digital audio out and analog audio out for less than $100. Time to put your money where your mouth is?

  321. Mini Mac Mechanism by babbage · · Score: 1

    So, out of curiosity, has anyone seen the guts of a Mini-mac yet ? The pictures I've seen on Apple's site -- particularly one of the motherboard and one with the cover removed -- give you some ideas -- compact motherboard, RAM on one side, skinny optical drive on top, mini-speaker in front -- but I'm curious about the hard drive: did they actually jam a full sized IDE drive in there, or is it a compact laptop model or a super-compact iPod one?

    Some of the rumor sites were paying slavish attention to the deals Apple was making for bulk purchases of minature hard drives from Asian manufacturers. All of this speculation centered around the possibilities for new iPod models, but it occurs to me that at least some of those drives are probably going into the new Mac as well.

    So -- has anyone had a chance to get pictures of a disassembly of a mini Mac yet ?

  322. Answers to frequently mentioned complaints by garagekubrick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nearly every complaint about the Mac Mini can be explained away by the general modularity of Macs which tend to be far more external than PCs. On my desk I have a Dell Winbox and a G5. I've had the G5 for a year now. Not one OS crash or failure or reboot. And now the only reason I run the PC is for soulseek. I will never go back to Windows, ever.

    1) 2 USB ports. What do you do after mouse / keyboard and you want to plug in a printer?

    A USB HUB. I can't believe people on /. have complained about this. Also, the standard Mac keyboard has two USB plugs.

    2) No Audio In - external firewire devices, which have been mentioned in many other posts with links, are readily available. If you're serious about gargeband you won't want a crappy minijack audio in anyway. You'll want a breakout box with a 1/4 or optical line in.

    3) No Optical Audio out - again the reverse of the above.

    4) Harddrive space, not enough for today's digital media. Same as an Ipod.

    Again, external firewire drives, which are very important to the Mac in general. I use my G5 primarily for heavy duty HD editing. Guess what I use for storage? No SCSI or Raid array - an off the shelf LaCie Terabyte external Firewire 800 drive. I took it out of the box, plugged it in, copied files over from the SATA drive that came with the system, and within 15 minutes my setup was complete with now a terabyte to work with. Hell, you could plug one of them into a Mac Mini if you had that much porn to archive and were going to hack the thing to be a video server.

    5) What hardware you're getting for that price.

    You're also getting OSX and iLife '05. I skipped iLife 04, but I am rushing out the day '05 hits, because it is just incredible what you're getting for 79$. That cost is part of the Mini Mac.

    Ultimately it's not even about the hardware. Granted I'm spoiled with a dual G5 processor, but when push comes to shove what made me fall in love with my Mac wasn't the sheer power of my system - it was the OS environment, the software, the interface, the stability, the lack of virus and spyware and adware and malware.

    That to me is easily worth $500, which is why this is a product that should be for two ends of the market. Clueless newbies who expect - rightly so - that things should work, and hardcore techies who can now afford to keep a second box. What I think you'll find is that under Jobs' second tenure the Mac has become a device for your life, and it's all to do with the exceptional software made for it.

    Most of us here shell out at least 1000 for a good PC system even if we build from scratch cause that's often the price for the best thing out there. Wouldn't you gladly pay $500 extra if you knew that WinXP would never crash, never present .DLL nightmares, pick up viruses in everything from cursor settings to email, et. al... For a base $500 you can have a computer that does that and so much more.

    6) No DVD Burner. Not enough RAM.

    You can add Ram without violating the warranty yourself. Apple is charging way too much for it. And you can add a Superdrive for about $100 if I recall right. Giving you the option to burn DVDs. This I believe is a cost everyone should upgrade to, especially once they see the ease of iMovie and iDVD.

    7) No VGA / S VIdeo out

    Well it comes with a DVI to VGA adapater - if you're hooking up to an HDTV then use DVI for the love of god. And you can get a SVIdeo out for 19$

    Did you also remember this is fanless and whisper quiet and smaller than a lunchbox? That they've liberated you from having to pair up with their overpriced (but absolutely phenonmenal) displays?

    Every bit of commentary I've seen about this computer has completely missed the point or just been rife with ignorance. Every single major gripe is addressable, and the price point is absoutely amazing, again, for the software. Most of the readers here do get it - they can afford to have one to play with, and I wouldn't be surpri

    --
    ** http://www.nkhumanrights.or.kr/ ** Human rights in North Korea. 1 million estimated dead from starvation.
    1. Re:Answers to frequently mentioned complaints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cannot add memory to the Mac Mini without voiding the warranty. The case will not open.

    2. Re:Answers to frequently mentioned complaints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea right:)

    3. Re:Answers to frequently mentioned complaints by FunkyChild · · Score: 1

      For a Mac soulseek client, check out 'Solarseek'. It doesn't have all the very latest features of the PC version like the recommendations, but it works very well. I was in a similar situation to you, but now my PC gets turned on less and less :)

    4. Re:Answers to frequently mentioned complaints by pb · · Score: 1

      So, to sum up:

      $499 gets you the PC I had three years ago, sans mouse and keyboard. You might also want:

      * A USB HUB
      * External audio firewire devices
      * External hard drive(s)

      However, after ringing up that huge extra hardware bill, fortunately, it's not about the hardware. You get the OS environment, the software, the interface, the stability, the lack of virus and spyware and adware and malware. Which, incidentally, is exactly why I started using Linux. And if that's easily worth $500 to you, then I'm getting a huge bargain, woo hoo!

      Incidentally I plan on shelling out maybe $500 for a good PC system, building it from scratch. You should price things out nowadays. Athlon 64, at least 512MB RAM, 200GB HD, modern (not 32MB! OMFG WTF??) video card, DVD *burner*, etc., etc. Amazing how cheap it all is when you aren't buying it from Apple. And I don't plan on paying any extra for an OS either, so go figure. No WinXP here!

      As for the 'fanless and whisper quiet and smaller than a lunchbox' part--that's very cool. If I got it for anything, that would be it. In fact, if Apple could come up with some cool tiny interfaces for this, I bet it could make an awesome *portable* device. Hook up a little screen mounted in a pair of glasses, use it on an airplane... now that really would be awesome. But there we go again, talking about extras.

      As for the "they've liberated you from having to pair up with their overpriced [...] displays" part--maybe that's a big step for them. I remember when they killed the clones too. I don't thank people for lifting ridiculous and artificial restrictions that they created. At best, they get a 'welcome to the rest of the world' from me.

      Anyhow, I know I'm totally outside their target market, and perhaps the intended audience for your post as well. Thanks to previous actions of Microsoft, I'm no Windows user--and thanks to previous actions of Apple, I'm no Mac user. If they had released something like this (literally) 2 or 3 years ago, maybe even for $1,000, I might have snapped it up (and put Linux on it, natch).

      Instead I got a 1.2Ghz Athlon, with 256MB RAM, 40GB worth of HD space (2x 20GB drives at the time), a 32MB video card (Matrox G400 Max), etc. And yes, in a beige tower. But other than that, the specs sound mighty familiar... :)

      --
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  323. Re:Mac mini vs. Dell Dimension 2400 (fully detaile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mac mini:

    Backup: ships with rsync, tar, dd etc etc. Better versions and free GUI tools by download.
    Database: MySQL, PostgreSQL etc etc by free download. Many nice free GUI tools.

  324. Firewire, DVI & a REAL GPU by taharvey · · Score: 1

    The dell has a fast processor, but its hobbled with shared ram intel extreme video.

    The Mac mini has at least a real video GPU. As apples Mac Mini website puts "it try running Halo on the cheapo PC".

    Firewire and DVI are something you won't find on the Dell $500 computer.

    The monetary values are equivalent. Apple has chosen to put money into features other than a fast processor, because it adds more real value to the customer (Who cares how many GHz it has, what does it do?)

  325. Expensive and kludgy by guidryp · · Score: 1

    I have mentioned this a few times elsewhere. I am well aware of this, but this is both an expensive and kludgy solution for something that should have been included.

    I will never buy another computer that doesn't include built in digital sound (currently have Nforce with soundstorm).

  326. Why not use Xgrid? by type40 · · Score: 1

    As far as I know (and I could be wrong) Apple provides a program similar to Beowulf called Xgrid. If your Mac can use 10.3 you can use Xgrid.

    --
    "You can see I know very little about pimp policy." George McGovern.
  327. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    " for $1500 you can build a decent two-way Athlon XP 3200 box, perhaps even an Athlon64 machine."

    Sure..but, I was thinking if I could get SSI working with the mini...get 3 of them for $1500...and have basically a 3 way machine with ppc...for the same amount of money as the 2 way athlon....

    Wouldn't that be even more fun?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  328. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "Just out of curiosity, why would you spend $1,500+ on 3 or 4 Mac Mini's when you can get a Dual 1.8GHz G5 from Apple for $1,999.00? If you are going to spend that much, just get the Dual Apple and be happy ; P"

    Well, mostly, it was just something fun to think about...but, also, it is easier to plunk down $500 every couple months to build a multi-way with mini-macs...than to plunkdown $2K in one shot.

    "If you want to do rendering, then a Mac Mini may work well. Most rendering software allows you to setup other "nodes" that the main computer can off-load processing to. What application are you using for rendering?"

    I was looking into using Blender to play around with....

    "What you are looking for is SSI SMP (Single System Image) SMP. Your not going to get that on Mac OS X and Xgrid. You will get that on Linux though.

    Yes...thanks...SSI is what I'm looking for...I've looked at mosix and open mosix as suggested...but, they seem only to be for the x86 chip. I can't tell what openssi will work with yet. Do you know of a SSI SMP application that will work on Linux on the ppc platform?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  329. Re:Looks like the love child of a Gamecube and a S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Urban Dictionary thinks so..

  330. Excellent reply by m3talsling3r · · Score: 1

    I've got 1k left to pay on my powerbook and this beats it's specs... hmmm wonder who got screwed? A pc user for this nice entry level mac with the power of a default pbook, or the recent pbook owner?

    Either way I'm happy to see this out. Now I'll have a nice desktop at home for my wife and can afford to get one for my kids too. Got plenty of extra keyboards and mice lying around. Now just get two monitors at sub-$100 and I'm set!

    --
    My sig is as boring as you...
  331. It's basically a laptop by Corellon+Larethian · · Score: 1

    Just without a monitor and battery.

    If I ever bought a Mac, I'd get one of these. I'm trying, right now, to justify another computer. I fucking [b]want[/b] one, but I'm completely stoked. I have all the machines I can find a use for.

    The only "upgrade" I'd pull would be the 512meg. I don't trust any of my windows machines on the net, but I'd certainly hook the Mac up. I might try talking my sister into getting one, and picking up a "cheap" 17" LCD from Sam's.

  332. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by dublin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lack of GigE was the first thing that brought me back to reality - it doesn't mean I still won't buy one (or more) but I put my Visa back in the wallet for now.

    For heaven's sake, why? Just a couple of years ago, I was designing cutting edge storage over IP systems. I'm telling you, a gigabit is really, really, fast. There are *very* few computers with i/o architectures and protocol stacks that can even begin to approach gigabit speeds.

    Don't fall for the marktdroid hype - GigE on a MiniMac will never be missed - even the big Macs and Powerbooks that come with GigE have no prayer of actually being able to use it. It's a bit like a nice Pontiac V-6 (the rest of the computer) powering a Ferrari look-alike (the GigE NIC)- it's just not going to be able to live up to the promise - don't be fooled, it's still a Fiero GT under the skin.

    In real life, unless you're building a storage backbone in a data center, or are doing *serious* workstation-type work on huge datasets (like terabyte CFD simulations or siesmic processing), you will NOT be able to use much more than 100 Mbps anyway, since the bottlenecks will be in your i/o paths and disk controllers. You need *very* serious RAID controllers to keep a gigabit wire full. I know: The system we built was 3x faster than IBM's high-end Shark storage server, and it took a year of hard work optimizing, tuning, and even waiting for Syskonnect to build a GigE card that could really deliver gigabit performance before we could fill that pipe. There are many more bottlenecks there than you would expect.

    Granted, hardware has gotten faster in the last two years, but unless you're doing the sort of stuff mentioned above (and are using high-$$$ network controllers, RAID adapters, etc.), you'll never miss it if you don't have gigabit.

    --
    "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  333. 4200rpm hard drive?? by Me2005 · · Score: 1

    No thanks, 4200 rpm is too slow. Personally i think having a 4200rpm drive is WORST than having only 256 MB ram.

    1. Re:4200rpm hard drive?? by a984 · · Score: 1

      fully agree. 4200rpm/2.5 (confirmed for minis) is a very dated technology and highly inadequate for OSX. Current largest 4200RPM is 100GB.

      5400 RPM are widely available in 40GB to 80GB sizes - $90-150.

      only one 7200 RPM in 60GB size. see here http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/05/14/hitachi_cr eates_dedicated_notebook_7200rpm/ roughly $150 now.

      I love the form factor but paying $150 extra for a decent drive and $55 for memory (http://www.pricewatch.com/h/prc.aspx?i=33&a=4560) assuming case can be open makes it 700+ no monitor/keyboard/mouse

      Not sure.

  334. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1
    You know it would be an import tarrif!!!

    At the same point you have better ski runs, cheaper BMW's, socialized healthcare, and all those Mentos ads!

    Your 10% is probably in there somewhere...

  335. Re:There's a petition for matching prices in the E by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1
    Ok, Im not the super world traveler, Ive only been to 4 other countries, and only one (England) in Europe. I was under the impression that in the EU each of the countries can impose their own local tax rate..

    Perhaps Apple should have had like 20+ pages for Europe...

    Just dont tell me that Esperanto is actually going to make it as the offical language!

  336. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sir, you need your winky wacked by a hot French maid.

  337. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    Dammit. Visa comes out of hiding again.

    Actually I am just coming down off a week long high doing GigE benchmarking using ramdrives (details in my Journal.) I have been able to peg GigE (116MB/s sustained throughput) in bogus benchmark tests but never in real applications.

    I have seen an increase from 10MB/s to 33MB/s (3x) on real applications, however, which is important when moving .iso's around, and more importantly when moving VM's around (details in older Journal entries, virtual machines = about 4-6GB apiece.) Neither of which, however, will I be doing on the MiniMac - so you are pretty much right in that 100Mbps ought to be plenty for whatever I am going to use it for.

    I will get one, no doubt, if for no other reason than to see what all versions of Linux I can get running on it (praying that SuSE 9.x has a PPC version, or that YellowDog cooperates) and because I want to play with OSX.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  338. Mini numbers; iBook, Powerbook G5 ship 2Q 2005 by a984 · · Score: 1

    current contracted production of Mini 100+k per month. G5 books will ship 2Q/05.

    http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20050114A7040.html

  339. shuffle contracted capacity by a984 · · Score: 1

    almost half a million a month per same source.

  340. Re:MACS SUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how all you out of the closet Mac fans...

    Wait, you honestly believe that these "closet Mac fans" are not actually lying and astroturfing Mac fanboys?

  341. Apple NZ continues to RIP OFF NEW ZEALANDERS by Robowally · · Score: 1

    Dear Monopoly rip-off merchants whoever you are......

    I see the new Mac Mini is $499 USD which translates to about $704 NZD.

    But I see Apple NZ is charging almost $950 NZD for the same machine. That is, um, almost $250 ABOVE the USA price.

    Wow, that is a great margin.

    I was thinking of buying one of these machines but not from NZ. Ok, so I risk the warranty but at that inflated rip-off price it is a gamble well worth taking.

    Perhaps one of the monopolists would like to explain or are they too busy counting all their money?!

    Seriously though, I would love to know why we are expected to pay such an overhead here in NZ.

    Thanks and regards,

    Robocopper

    --
    Karma? Sorry, i don't believe in superstition. http://talk.thinkingmatters.org.nz
  342. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by ndpatel · · Score: 1

    for half the cash, you could go on ebay and buy a true dual processor ppc machine. a search for "dual g4" brings up lots of dual 1.2ghz MDD models, for about $850-$1000, depending.
    plus these machines have far more expansion capabilities, and aren't limited by the 5400rpm notebook drive of the mini.

    i mean, why would you waste so much time and effort on getting SSI to work on the minis when you could just get a true dualie with even more potential?

    --
    london is drowning and i live by river
  343. And I must add... by hsoft · · Score: 1

    I must add that I for one *seriously* consider to move to mac when I see this pretty box.

    I'm pretty sure that the mac mini will convert a lot of PC people to mac.

    --
    perception is reality
  344. Re:Dupe...(Kind of) by gabebear · · Score: 1

    This Mac is probably a perfect OSX/Linux Box since it has an Radeon 9200(rv280), which has 3D support under Linux/PPC, although it's not necessarily easy to configure. So hopefully every piece of hardware on this Mac can be used under Linux! MOOF!

    I'm pretty stoked about this, the Radeon 9200 is the newest card with decent 3D open source drivers, cool!

    One thing I can't find any info on is whether it is fanless? I would think they would tote fanless design, but from the internal pics it could only have a small fan if it does. I HATE small fans!

  345. Depends on what your PDA a's you with by ianscot · · Score: 1
    The stand alone (non-phone) PDA market is dying. There will continue to be a market for things like the Palm Treo and Windows Smart Phones. Unless Apple wants to get into the Phone business, I don't see that they would have a product.

    I know what you're saying, but I don't agree with the "Apple would have to have a phone" part.

    Okay, "stand alone" PDAs have hit the wall. But frankly they weren't impressive for a lot of reasons -- all of which seem like they're exactly the sort of design and market niche problems Apple is currently solving like nobody else -- while they also combine features and function groups in interesting ways. Recent history has Apple releasing "digital hub" products that make idiosyncratic choices about feature sets. Maybe current market thinking says phones have to be part of the product, but then that's the same thinking that releases 2,000 phones with variations on the same three features. Apple doesn't release products identical to those already saturating the market, yep, you're right. But they wouldn't have to.

    If you'd said they were releasing a "new cube, but at $500" a couple of weeks ago, I'd have been skeptical, yes? Pitched a little differently, though...

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  346. And in other news, abacuses are cheaper too! by FredFnord · · Score: 1

    So that would be the Beige G3/266, which doesn't run 10.3 at all, which certainly won't run 10.4, and which even crashes once a week or so when you're running 10.2.8 (which is rock-solid on other machines). They have ADB I/O, a built-in SCSI motherboard connector, no firewire, no USB, old-world ROMs which have serious problems with bootstrapping Mac OS X at all... I could go on.

    As opposed to the Blue and White G3. which runs 10.2 and 10.3 just fine, and which almost certainly will run 10.4 as well.

    Now, quick quiz: which one is worth more? (No, not to YOU, but on the open market.)

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  347. Case Mod Time! by nickmdf · · Score: 1

    No doubt some loner is scheming how to stuff that
    baby into a Mac Classic case when his arrives in
    a few weeks!

  348. Great Buy For Parents by NetFu · · Score: 1

    Clock speed doesn't matter to most people. Most people want to buy a computer to do certain things, and until the Mac Mini comes out, the cool looking Mac option is out of the question.

    I have 5 kids (3 of my own plus 2 step-kids), and when it comes to buying a computer for one of them, I'm not spending over $700 unless I personally have a use for it.

    Go out to a store like Best Buy, Fry's, or Microcenter and actually look at the computers you can get for less than $700. They generally are nowhere near as nice or compact as the Mac Mini. The fact that you can get one for $499 is a huge advantage for parents because a basic PC that does what you want will cost $699. You don't need a 2.8GHz P4 for word processing, web surfing, and chatting? Too bad, because you can't get anything slower/cheaper than that unless you get a Sempron PC with minimal capabilities, and even that costs $550 with a decent non-shared-memory video card!

    I went shopping for exactly what I'm talking about over Christmas. I ended up scrounging up a used P-II because it was good enough and I didn't want to spend $550+. If I could've bought a Mac Mini for $499 plus tax, I would've bought it.

    Look at Dell's website today. Their entry-level desktop is $499 (after a $60 rebate). At that price, you get 256mb RAM (like the Mac Mini), WinXP Home (come on, you have to admit Mac OS X is better than XP Home!), 40gb drive (like the Mac Mini), 17 inch .27dp CRT (better than the nothing you get with the Mac Mini, but .27dp is nearly like a TV), and CD-RW OR DVD-ROM (the Mac Mini comes with a CD-RW/DVD-ROM combo which is better).

    If you remove the Dell CRT, which is crappy anyway, you get a $45 rebate, but if you add the CD-RW/DVD-ROM combo drive you add $53, so the net cost is $563 (minus the $56 rebate). So, basically Dell's entry level PC is a huge standard PC desktop for the same price as the Mac Mini which is the size of a fat CD case, both with comparable features.

    The only thing you could argue is that the 2.8GHz P4 is actually faster than a 1.25GHz G4, and that your kids actually need it. I won't get into that because I know from personal use that the performance of my 1.25GHz iMac is comparable to my 2.8GHz P4, and only a lunatic would really believe they could see some tiny performance difference.

    In my case, either computer is more than enough for kids who have cheap PS2 and XBox for playing games. So, the question is which one will more easily fit into my living room or in my kids crowded bedroom desk? The Mac Mini will.

    To me, the Mac Mini makes perfect sense for parents who either are tired of dealing with problems with existing home PC's (like me), and/or who want a cheap high-quality computer that will fit anywhere. The clock-speed is really inconsequential, so the Mac Mini makes Apple competitive in low-end computer sales. The fact that you get it in such a tiny package will often be the deal-maker, especially for parents with crowded homes.

    The Mac Mini is really a smack in the face of the computer world. Got a PC acting up every week and giving you grief??? Just buy a Mac Mini for $499 and make it all go away. The PC, that is.

    I'm still waiting to see the vaporous WinXP capuccino PC's. Oh shoot, with the same specs as the $499 Mac Mini, it costs $799!!! And for that price, you get CRAPPY shared memory video that can't be upgraded to decent video like on the Mac Mini. No wonder I didn't buy it. Check it out if you actually want to pay a premium for a Windows PC, but don't expect to see it at local stores:

    http://www.cappuccinopc.com/

  349. too new by catmistake · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for the next revision to get a mini... It'll have all the kinks worked out and be more powerful.

  350. Bring your own. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to use a DELL flat screen and a MICROSOFT keyboard... so what