Slashdot Mirror


Cable TV Versus Satellite TV?

rufey writes "In the next few weeks I'll be moving and am thinking about getting either cable TV or satellite. I don't need broadband Internet (I use DSL), so getting cable TV bundled with broadband is not an option I'm considering. Comcast is the local cable provider in my area, and are playing TV spots about how satellite TV signals can be lost when it rains, when the wind blows, and even when the dog sneezes (I'm sure the dog sneezing excuse in the commercials are more for humor than fact). What has been Slashdot readers' experience with cable and satellite TV? I'm looking at trying to balance cost versus quality of signal and picture. How much does the weather affect the signal quality of satellite TV reception? Some satellite packages include a DVR (Comcast doesn't offer one yet in my area). Is it worth getting the DVR supplied by the satellite company (DirectTV, DishNetwork), or is buying a separate TiVo a better option? As a geek, I'm also interested in getting NASA TV."

1,218 comments

  1. Satellite has one big advantage by corebreech · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've only had experience with the DVR Time/Warner cable was offering and it wouldn't let you time-shift anything but PPV content, but I don't know if that applies to Comcast as well. If it does, you could stick a TiVO or your own DVR into the equation, but then what you're doing is decoding the MPEG from your cable provider, then reencoding it back into MPEG when it gets saved to the hard disk, which sucks. This is assuming you're getting digital cable of course.

    The satellite DVR packages on the other hand will save the MPEG stream directly to the hard disk, so you can view it later without loss of image quality.

    This is all the more important if you're thinking about going with HDTV. DirecTV is about to come out with a HD-DVR made in conjunction with TiVO. DishNetwork's HD-DVR is already out, but it will set you back a cool thousand.

    If there was actually something worth watching on TV beside porn, I'd get the latter, if for no other reason than that DirecTV won't carry porn, but seeing as how Murdoch has bought DirecTV from Hughes that's probably about to change.

    The consensus on rec.video.satellite.dbs seems to be that weather really doesn't affect image quality (though this may not be true for HD content) but that airplanes, helicopters, birds and people falling off of your roof can and do. That said, it supposedly causes only minor artifacting (which you're going to get anyways given the aggressive compression the providers use... watch Star Trek: TNG on Spike TV sometime and watch the signal lose sync everytime somebody fires a phaser.)

    1. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Algan · · Score: 3, Informative

      A friend of mine has the Comcast DVR and they let him timeshift everything...

      --
      If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?
    2. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      DirecTV does carry porn -- and some of the channels are the same as Dish Network. They have Playboy, Spice, and three hardcore channels. From what I hear, Dish will show more (namely: anal), but DirecTV does carry porn (channels 594 - 598)

    3. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DirecTV won't carry porn

      Funny, cuz there's been porn channels (playboy, spice, PPV porn) on the DirecTV on screen guide for at least a couple years.

    4. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by prell · · Score: 4, Informative

      I had a Time Warner PVR when they were still testing them, and it worked out wonderfully, for me: I scheduled recordings; I could rewind live TV (and fast-forward up until the "live point"); I could pause for up to two hours or something (whatever the length of the "live cache" was); I could record two things at once, while playing something off the hard drive; I could record something, and watch something else, with full RW/FF/Pause capabilities.

    5. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by PD · · Score: 5, Informative

      The PVR that comes with a service is not an advantage for either. The reason being that you REALLY want to get a TiVo. Everything sucks in comparison (mileage may vary).

      TiVo will work with either your satellite or cable, without any trouble. As far as the other issues, I've had both DirectTV and Dish Network (currently have Dish). You will lose the signal when it rains hard. I live in Texas, the land of flash floods, and the most I've lost my signal for is an hour. More typical is 3-4 minutes. It takes a hell of a storm to block the signal for longer than that.

      Birds, airplanes, people, etc. will not block the signal. Anyone who claims that they will is on crack.

    6. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have comcast cable and internet,
      we lost it during hurricane elizabeth and it
      was the last service to be restored by nearly a
      week (we also lost power and telephones). Phones
      were back first, power second.

    7. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by jdaily · · Score: 2, Funny

      > ...but that airplanes, helicopters, birds and people falling off of your roof can and do.

      Fortunately, I've never had an airplane or helicopter fall off my roof. Dodged a bullet on that one!

    8. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 4, Funny

      Birds, airplanes, people, etc. will not block the signal. Anyone who claims that they will is on crack.

      Or has had a large bird, airplane or people crash onto their roof directly on top of the dish.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    9. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by lambadomy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Uh, I work for DirecTV, and there is porn all over the place here. I was under the impression we were actually broadcasting it too. If not, I'm going to really have to change my opinion about some of the people in this place.

    10. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Lakers · · Score: 1

      TiVo will work, but to my knowledge, you need one specifically for satellite (i.e., standard store bought one for cable won't work).

      We have a TiVo that we used for cable at an old residence. We recently moved and setup satellite, no go.

      The problem is my TiVo has a cable tuner, not a satellite tuner built in.

      Maybe the newer models support both satellite and TV.

    11. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by corebreech · · Score: 2

      I should have been more specific.

      I'm talking about uncut porn channels that you pay for by the month. The only channel DirecTV offers by the month is Playboy, which I don't consider porn.

      All the others are PPV, and as you've noted, are edited.

      (or at least that's what I've heard.)

    12. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, DirecTV has 7 channels of porn, including the hardcore variety.

    13. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by dangold · · Score: 1

      The DISH Network, which I recently had _horrendous_ customer service issues with, actually has a fantastic PVR.

      I previously used my old 1st-edition ReplayTV with the regular cable and noticed the slow-down when recording something and watching something else, but this one is flawless, and has especially speedy time-movement abilities. It has some quirks, like hitting 'rewind' reduces your fast forward speed down a level, and vice versa, as opposed to jumping instantly to going backwards.

      I called DISH and they told me I could get a two-box system, one of them a PVR, for $50 a month and 3 months free. I don't know if this was a holiday deal, as it was December, but I have the PVR, another box, and lots of HBO's and other movie channels, all available for time-shifting, for less than $50 (I added in local channels, and the second box - they're both extra). Fantastic.

    14. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Red+Leader. · · Score: 1

      My parents (Albany, NY area) have a Time Warner DVR that they find works just fine. Which programs you can time-shift are not restricted and they seem happy with it.

      I live in Northern VA and have Comcast. I have a Series 2 TiVo, so I haven't seen or used Comcast's DVR offerings, but judging by what you get with a Time Warner DVR you'll have to pry my TiVo out of my cold, dead fingers. The interface on the Time Warner DVR is nowhere near as pretty, efficient or intuitive as TiVo's; its ability to manage what you want to record is far inferior; there's no 30-second skip hack; the remote control can't really be operated without looking - it's got a horrendous layout. Basically, I would say don't waste your time and money with anything but TiVo.

      As far as Comcast's service goes, I have both TV and cable modem and have no major complaints. Outages are very rare and seem to be repaired rather quickly when they do occur. I've heard really bad things about Cox down in Alexandria, though, so be wary. In general, I think service is very specific to neighborhood-level infrastrucutre, so ask around the area immediately around where you're going to see what people think.

    15. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by corebreech · · Score: 1

      My mistake. I should have said, uncut porn that you can buy by the month, like any other channel.

      DirecTV only has PPV (unless you count Playboy, which I don't) and even then its that crappy pan-and-zoom porn.

    16. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by JDevers · · Score: 1

      Playboy shows uncut porn sometimes, totally up in the air as to which movies they will show everything and which are basically HBO level...

      The others aren't edited, they just don't show movies with anal in them...everything else including money shots is there...

    17. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by nate1138 · · Score: 2, Informative

      DishNetwork's HD-DVR is already out, but it will set you back a cool thousand.

      No it won't. When I signed up with Dish Network, they installed the dish, 2 normal receivers, and a DishPVR for 99 bucks. As far as how it compares to Tivo? I tried a Tivo, and the delay when switching channels really pissed me off. The DishPVR has no such delay. All in all, I've had no problems out of it, technical or otherwise. And to answer one of the other questions, that BS about the satellite being unreliable is absolute bullshit. My cable modem stops working before my sat goes out.

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    18. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Gamgeek+ · · Score: 5, Informative

      A further advantage of DirecTV is that if you have Tivo (DirecTivo actually) you can stream TWO channels to the Tivo's drive while either watching one of them or a third show from the drive. This is an outstanding feature. And to chime in on the weather issue - I live in snowy PA and have practically no issues. Just mount the dish so it doesn't get burried in snow and you'll be fine...

    19. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by corebreech · · Score: 1

      ...there's no 30-second skip hack

      Ahhh, my mistake, that's what I meant... I remember they're offering it to me and that there was something they did to it that made it useless. I got the two confused.

      So you can time-shift, you just can't skip commercials.

      Sorry bout that.

    20. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by queequeg1 · · Score: 1

      Aren't you talking about a standard definition set up, and not the new high def set up?

    21. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by octover · · Score: 1

      I think he is talking about the HD PVR, where as you probably have just a normal PVR.

    22. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by cdipierr · · Score: 1

      No, he said the HD-PVR will set you back a grand, which is true. The regular PVR (which you have) doesn't record HD signals.

    23. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by corebreech · · Score: 1

      That's not the HD-PVR though. I'm talking about the DishPVR 921.

      There's a big difference between the two.

    24. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      No longer an advantage with DirecTV over Dish. Dish has the 721 receiver (2 tuners, 1 output), 522 (2 tuners, 2 outputs), and the 921 (2 HD tuners, 2 outputs I beleive). Each one is capable of recording 1 show while watching live or pre-recorded content, or recording 2 shows while watching a 3rd pre-recorded show. I don't beleive the currently available DirecTIVOs will do output 2 seperate signals like the 522/921 will.

    25. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by MrBlue+VT · · Score: 1

      I don't have Tivo, but I'd imagine it can use an IR Blaster to change channels on the satellite.

    26. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      I've only had experience with the DVR Time/Warner cable was offering and it wouldn't let you time-shift anything but PPV content, but I don't know if that applies to Comcast as well.

      That doesn't apply to the one from Time-Warner, either, at least not around here.

      You might want to let them know about the problem you're having; there were some quality control problems with the DVR units.

      I've been time-shifting everything all over the place with my Time-Warner DVR, including PPV. You just have to order the PPV first before you can select it to record.

    27. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by nate1138 · · Score: 1

      Yup, that's the standard def gear. I've been trying to get the bastards to come off of some HD for a while, but all the deals are only for new customers.

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    28. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by CaseM · · Score: 1
      The consensus on rec.video.satellite.dbs seems to be that weather really doesn't affect image quality (though this may not be true for HD content) but that airplanes, helicopters, birds and people falling off of your roof can and do.

      If by "affect image quality" you mean lose your feed entirely, then yes, weather can and does affect satellite tv (DirecTV in my case). A big thunderstorm rolling through town in the summertime has no problem knocking out my signal for the entire duration. It's not really a big deal, though, as long as I'm not watching the last 5 minutes of a CSI...

      "Aha! I knew it all along...the killer is none other than..."
      *Rumble* [Signal Interrupted. Please stand by.]
      "Goddammit!"
    29. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      You can use the Tivo's IR 'Blasters' to change the channels on a satellite box or a digital cable box...

      I had satellite going a couple years back..I loved it. It is just that the last 2 places I live at...don't have a view to the sky for the dishes...so, I'm back to cable. I found I rarely lost signal on satellite...and I live in New Orleans where we get tons of rain. Mine stayed on even with the weak edge of a hurricane hitting up a few years back...

      I'd like to get back on it...and if I can find a place to mount my dishes again...I'll be going with them. I just hooked up with Cox cable for my broadband connection (cancelling Mindspring/Earthlink DSL whose service really went downhill). But, you don't have to have tv cable to have the internet connection...so, if I ever get to where I can go back to satellite...I will.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    30. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is utter horsecrap.

      To the Tivo, the Satellite receiver is just another cable box. You hook them together the same way that you would a box from Cox or Warner. The Tivo tunes into channel 4 (or whatever) just like your TV would.

      My series one Tivo is recording off of Dish Network as we speak.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    31. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by nate1138 · · Score: 1

      Whoops, those two little letters do make a difference, don't they ;-)

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    32. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by M.+Silver · · Score: 2, Informative

      You will lose the signal when it rains hard. I live in Texas, the land of flash floods, and the most I've lost my signal for is an hour.

      We used to lose the signal for a couple of hours at a time... in Kansas, so I imagine we're pointing at the same sat. (We might still do so, if we were actually using the service.)

      We have the standard size dish, though (18"?). A friend bought the next size up (24"?), and never lost signal.

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
    33. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TiVO? What if we have ReplayTV? (which is better these days? also, if you want to increase your HD for either, which is easier?)

    34. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by freeze128 · · Score: 1
      watch Star Trek: TNG on Spike TV sometime and watch the signal lose sync everytime somebody fires a phaser.
      I wouldn't blame that on the digital compression or transmission... Sync loss from explosions has been happening even since TNG went into syndication. I think it's more due to the transmitter's built in Automatic gain control on their sync circuitry. It probably doesn't react fast enough to changes, and mistakes the transition from a bright explosion to plain old black as a vertical sync signal.

      As for digital signal quality from satellite - a friend has directTV (satellite) and I see maybe 3 signal losses over 5 hours of use. Each interruption lasting only 5 seconds or so. It's not bad, but certainly not up to my level of quality, especially if I was recording something that I would want to save.
    35. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by nodata2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      that's because you don't live here http://www.snopes.com/photos/military/landing.asp

    36. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      You will lose the signal when it rains hard.

      Exactly. The same crap I put up with using Comcast cable.

      I find those commercials about satellite losing its signal easily ammusing b/c in all the situations it is the users fault.

    37. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by TGK · · Score: 5, Informative

      Disclaimer: I presently draw a paycheck from Echosphere, parent company of Echostar, parent company of Dish Network.

      I'll lay this down for you all. There are definite advantages to both Satellite and Cable. The experience you have with either service will differ depending on what you choose as far as your service contract goes.

      First, though, a few myths to dispel or clarify as the case may be.

      Weather Related Signal Loss: Signal Strength is generally rated on a 125 point scale with Dish Network (100 points with DirecTV if memory serves). During a heavy rain storm you should expect to see a signal loss of about 20 points. At about 50 points of total signal you'll see pixilation occurring due to the MPEG2 compression. At 40 points you'll loose signal altogether unless it's a massively redundant broadcast. Your typical install with four receivers will get you 98 - 120 signal on each receiver.

      During snow you will experience signal loss, especially if your dish is at a higher angle of elevation. This is because snow will collect on the reflecting surface, blocking the signal.

      Hidden Charges There is no such thing as a hidden charge.... provided you read the contract. I'm familiar with Dish's contracts and they're written in fairly tame legal speak, if I can understand it you can to. Yes, you will be charged for additional receivers. Yes, the equipment is up to you to maintain after the first year unless you arrange otherwise. Yes your installation is probably not under warranty beyond 90 days. Dish offers a number of fairly good warranty plans including the Digital Home Advantage plan, which for the most part covers all of your equipment and charges nominal fees for things like restringing all the cable in your house in the event of a catastrophic failure of some kind. I'm sure DirecTV has a similar offer; I don't know what it is.

      HD TV - If you must have HD and you've already set with the equipment your best bet is going to be Voom. If you're still looking into getting the equipment, Dish runs a close 2nd with the 811 (standard HD receiver) being a pretty standard part of most installs (at customer request). Dish also offers a promotion called HD In a Box, wherein you get an 811 plus a 34 or 40 inch HD set to go with it for about $999.

      Now, as far as drawback to satellite v cable go, it breaks like this.

      Cable
      -- Bigger rate increases
      -- Crappy customer service (getting better)
      -- Higher rates overall

      Satellite
      -- Equipment is your problem for the most part
      -- Local channels are extra (5.99 typically) and may not be offered in your area
      -- Extra charges per additional receiver.

      And finally, a tidbit of wisdom for those of you considering signing up for a satellite dish right now. The Dish Network DVR 522 is offered as part of Digital Home Advantage. Presently it allows DVR service in two rooms more or less for the price of one room. Future software will allow you to use this receiver as a dual tuner DVR in one location if you so choose (and it will toggle between the two). That feature isn't ready yet, so it's not being advertised... but when we see it it's gonna be sweet!

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    38. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by bsane · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I also lose satalite signal during big storms, but when I had cable I would lose it on a sunny afternoon.

      All in all the total downtime is about the same, but at least I have an idea of whats going on when I lose the satelite.

    39. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by slashmark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Damn, I thought I kicked that crack habit. I live near the San Diego airport, and the planes do disrupt the DirecTV signal briefly. Understand that I live so close that the airport authority sound proofed my house for free. The planes are pretty low.

      And I agree, Tivo is the way to go.

    40. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Tenfish · · Score: 1

      My DirectTV satellite box had a serial port that the Tivo hooked right up to. My Dish Network sat box uses the IR blasters. Both of them work very well, though the DTV serial connection changed the channels faster.

      The TiVo's you buy in the store will work with either satellite or cable right out of the box.

      --

      --Guns don't kill people, abortion clinics kill people.
    41. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the Dish PVR interface can't hold a candle to tivo.

    42. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there was actually something worth watching on TV beside porn, I'd get the latter, if for no other reason than that DirecTV won't carry porn

      DirecTV most assuradly *does* carry porn.

    43. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And talk about stupid birds...

    44. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


      It makes sense to go to a larger dish in many cases: 18" ~= 255 sq inches of dish 24" ~= 452 sq inches of dish.

    45. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by calbanese · · Score: 1

      It sounds like his dish is out of alignment. I used to have problems like this alot until I figured out that my mount point was slowly sagging, taking the dish with it. Since I readjusted (about 9 months ago), I haven't lost signal yet (with Dish Network). I love DishNetwork. The only thing I might switch to would be DirecTV to get DirecTivo, but the DishNetwork Dishplay 501 (really old now), is goot for recording, pasuing skiping etc.). It just doesn't have 2 tuners for recording 2 channels, though you can record a channel while watching a taped show. Also Dish Network has a deal so that I get a crapload of "SuperStations." I get the WB Denver and UPN Los Angeles (I live in NY) in addition to the local stations. I will never switch back to cable. I get the "Everything pack" which is all their channels (less pr0n) for about $100.

    46. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by ckd · · Score: 3, Informative
      he PVR that comes with a service is not an advantage for either. The reason being that you REALLY want to get a TiVo. Everything sucks in comparison (mileage may vary).

      The DirecTV DVR is a TiVo (ok, now it's "powered by TiVo"). It also has two satellite tuners so you can record two shows at once (and even watch a third, previously recorded, show). It also records the digital stream directly, so no recompression to worry about.

      As for rain fade, install it well (or get a good pro install) and you will rarely if ever have a problem IME. The stronger your signal is on a clear day, the more margin you will have when it rains. (Also, make sure the dish is well secured and/or shielded from strong winds if you have 'em.) From Boston, we only get rain fade once or twice a year at most, and no snow fade (the dish surface is vertical enough that it slides right off).

    47. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by tommck · · Score: 1

      They call it DirecTivo... it's a Tivo inside the DirecTV receiver. It has the advantage of directly streaming to disk and it's also cheaper than a normal Tivo (I believe it's only an extra $5/month).

      Definitely worth it.

      T

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    48. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by M.+Silver · · Score: 1

      It makes sense to go to a larger dish in many cases

      Yup. If we were as serious about TV-watching as the friend was, we'd probably have the larger dish (and double-barreled receiver too). Of course, wind is a factor here in the Land of the South Wind, so the larger dish picks up more wind wobble - ours is on a 6' pole set in a planter full of Quik-Rete, and swayed surprisingly little (being set in a sheltered location helps), but if we had the bigger dish we might have had to go to something with even more stability.

      Nowadays, we just have Netflix.

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
    49. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by poptix_work · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hey moron, my tivo *is* my IRD (satellite receiver) so it has all the menus/guides built in, and there is no seperate charges for the tivo service (I have a premiere account).

      The philips DSR704 is $99 at best buy, comes with a 40G drive. I upgraded it to a capacity of 320GB and it's the greatest thing on earth. =)

      --
      Just because you disagree doesn't make it offtopic or flamebait.
    50. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      If they're losing signal that often, their dish is probably poorly aimed or mounted. I'd guess they're getting a lower signal strength all the time and having it completely drop out every so often, or the dish is mounted so the wind can move it around enough to make a difference.

      The only time I've ever had the signal go out completely was for about 30 seconds during a really strong thunderstorm with heavy winds. Last week I lost ESPN-2 (and, presumably, anything else on the same transponder, but flipping through the channels everything else seemed to be working ok) when the bottom 4 inches of my dish was completely covered with ice and snow.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    51. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by jd10131 · · Score: 1

      Here in Canada, there have been many similar commercials from the local cable providers. They are running scared.

      My building has an ExpressVu dish on the side, and I had this for about two years. Quality was excellent, price was good.

      I think there was one time where I had a significant signal problem, which went away in five minutes. Rarely, there might also be a momentary blip, which happens with cable too.

      I live in some of the rainiest climate. (That'd be Vancouver, BC) Rain never caused a problem for my signal.

    52. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by poptix_work · · Score: 1

      Well, I live in a major flight path to the airport (~8 miles away) so we get a lot of very low flying aircraft on approach, occasionally I _do_ get a blip on the satellite that coincides with an airplane flying over.

      Of course, I'm in a rather unique situation =)

      --
      Just because you disagree doesn't make it offtopic or flamebait.
    53. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by KirkH · · Score: 1

      I doubt that this is a big deal. All the contractors were probably helping out the phone and power guys first. Hell, maybe Comcast even lent out their guys to help them. Would you really rather have cable service restored before power?? Unless you're hit by a class 5 hurricane every month, I wouldn't use this as a prime example.

    54. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've had Playboy since they launched the service.

    55. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Fizzol · · Score: 1
      >The consensus on rec.video.satellite.dbs seems to be that weather really doesn't affect image quality

      That may be the consensus but it's certainly not universally true. Severe weather, and I'm talking deluge quality rain or really thick snow laden clouds, can definately affect your image quality, sometimes severely. I've had Direct TV go completely offline because of cloud cover. It's rare, but it does indeed happen.

    56. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by The+Spoonman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've got the TW DVR, too, and for the most part it IS a great addition to my service, but there are two issues that keep me from recommending it to people:

      1) If I'm watching a TV show, and have to leave or something, I can't just hit Record and go. If I just hit record out of the blue, the DVR will continue recording until I either a) unplug the box or b) set it to record something else in the future, then cancel that recording. PITA.

      2) The scheduling of recordings is almost useless. Let's say you wanna set it to record "Enterprise" every week. That show is now on Wednesdays at 9PM. I can't tell the DVR to record every episode that starts on Wed night at 9, I have to tell it to record EVERY EPISODE of the show. And, if the show's on more than once a week, you get every one, even if it's a repeat. Stupid, stupid, stupid. "Enterprise" isn't that big a deal 'cause it's only shown twice a week, but my wife's pissed that she has to manually set it to record "Queer Eye" every friggin' week, 'cause otherwise, the HD gets filled by Thursday. Does Bravo show anything else but "Queer Eye" anymore?

      --
      Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
      http://www.workorspoon.com
    57. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I work for a cable company, I reccomended to my brothers and monther to get the dish instead of cable. In fact I would have the dish if I did not get cable for free/insane discount (My cable package would cost a regular person $150.00 a month easy)

      The dish does NOT get affected in heavy rain or snowfall UNLESS it is a massive downpour, and it is aligned right. a misaligned dish will look good on a clear day, but crap out easily.

      also you can get heated dishes, which is what I reccomended to my family so buildup of snow is a non-issue.

      Dish + DSL. the only way to go until the calbe companies figure out how to cut their rates in 1/2..

      My mother pay's nearly 1/2 her old cable rate and get's more channels + locals on the satfeed in 3 rooms.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    58. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by mcj · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Also, the $5/month covers multiple TiVos. I have an old Series 1 Sony DirecTiVo and a newer Hughes Series 2 DirecTiVo, and still just pay the $5. Nice.

      I scored the Hughes one at Circuit City for $100 a few months ago...didn't even matter that I was already a DirecTV customer (just had to agree to another year on my service agreement).

    59. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by poptix_work · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have to agree with corebreech, the quality of satellite is well beyond what I ever got from Comcast/AT&T, the TiVO is built into my satellite reciever so there are no funky issues with IR blasters, it has dual tuners, it cost $99, I was able to add disk space to it, an ethernet adapter (USB) and I can yank shows off of it.

      The DVR/PVR units that TW and Comcast are selling their customers are sub-par, and not hackable AFAIK.

      I've known a few people who were snobs about their TW PVR units, until I brought them over to check out my DirecTV Tivo, they've been converted =)

      Until cable providers start providing PVR's that allow you to skip commercials decently (along with the rest of the great tivo features), they'll always be sub-par.

      --
      Just because you disagree doesn't make it offtopic or flamebait.
    60. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      The DirecTV DVR has TiVo software. so it has all of the features of a TiVo (excluding the Home Media Option). It also has vastly superior picture quality, Dolby Digital, no need to download guide data (it gets it off the satellite), and 2 tuners to record 2 things at once.

    61. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by nvrrobx · · Score: 2, Informative

      The current TimeWarner DVR box (atleast here in the San Fernando Valley in Los Angeles) allows you to timeshift normal programs. The box you're thinking of is the standard box that does iControl (on-demand - I have that box also)

      The TimeWarner DVR box has a great interface, but has one major drawback - DO NOT put it in your stereo cabinet, especially if it has doors on it. The unit has no cooling system and will quite quickly eat its hard drive alive.

      The TW DVR box is also dual tuner, so it defintely competes with the DirecTV DVR (TiVo) service.

      The DirecTV HD-DVR will set you back $1k also, unless you're a new subscriber, then you can pick one up for like $99 or something, when it's actually released.

      Weather does not greatly impact DirecTV signal either. I moved to LA from Seattle, and my satellite never suffered from "rain fade". The key is to make sure you have a signal quality of 90% or more on a clear, sunny day, then you won't be affected. A friend can't get better than 75-80% on a good day, and he was drastically affected by rain fade. That ruined more than one Mariners game we tried to watch!

    62. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      OK, so UK satellite dishes are different (Sky Minidish), but the only time we've had problems was when there was 1/2" of ice on the dish and 120mph winds. It was nasty out, so I left it until the wind died down a littleto re-align the dish. I had to retrieve my car, too. It had blown about 200 yards down the street.

    63. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      To the Tivo, the Satellite receiver is just another cable box. You hook them together the same way that you would a box from Cox or Warner. The Tivo tunes into channel 4 (or whatever) just like your TV would.

      Better yet, you run audio and S-video cables between your [satellite receiver|digital cable box] and your TiVo, and you set your TiVo to record from the S-video input instead of its built-in tuner. You get much less signal degradation that way.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    64. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by SageMusings · · Score: 1

      It seems I've been luckier than most,

      I've yet to lose my signal from any atmospheric problems. The only thing I have not experienced yet is snow. Snow by itself is not supposed to present a problem, however. Rather it is when the white stuff collects in the dish that causes problems.

      Rain has never given me a problem, nor birds, or even aircraft.

      --
      -- Posted from my parent's basement
    65. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you even read the original comment?

      The original comment refers to the *high definition* Dish PVR. You got a *standard definition* Dish PVR + 2 *standard definition* recievers for $99. Many stores offer the same deal with the DirecTV DVR (1 DVR + 2 Recievers for $99, installed)

    66. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      I'd be in trouble.

      In my days what I actually owned a tv and watched cable, I used to be a History Channel fanatic. But the shows played once at dinner time, and then they looped about 3 times until the next morning. Great if you caught something halfway through getting home from work and are an insomniac who is up at 2am.

      I had some favorites (mmmm... history of the gun, military blunders, that cheezy show with the Soviet planes) so I can imagine that I too would be duplicating an awful lot of programming.

      I know it's linux on the interior. Any scripting tools out there?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    67. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by ball-lightning · · Score: 1

      In my experience personal experience with Dish Network in New Jersey, outages are extremely rare, and only usually occur during heavy precipitation. In the last year, I'd say I've probably lost my service about 4 times, which isn't too bad considering cable tv goes down just about as often (cable is just cable in the last mile after all, they use sattelites too). That being said, if you plan on having a ton of TVs in your house, I'd go for cable. Probably the biggest problem with satelite is that (for the Dish Network, anyway) you are limited to a certain amount of TVs per satelite, which sucks if you want to have more than 4 televisions.

    68. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by alatesystems · · Score: 1

      I have the tw dvr. I can tell it to record just first run Enterprise, or just Episodes coming on at Wed at 9. Perhaps I have a different box/software revision. Also, I _CAN_ hit record and go and if I've been watching the show, it grabs the "live cache" as someone else has called it and includes it too. So if I'm 15 min into a 30 min show and i hit record, it records the whole 30 min show.

      Chris Benard

    69. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by elmegil · · Score: 1
      Hidden Charges There is no such thing as a hidden charge.... provided you read the contract.

      That's just goddamn doubletalk. If you bury the charges deep in the legalese of the contract instead of having a straightforward matrix explaining all the charges and how they apply, you're being a lying lawyerly shark scumbag of a company, and that's all there is to it. Is there any EXCUSE to complain about "hidden charges" if you didn't read the contract? No. But consumers have a legitimate expectation that pricing structures will be explained clearly in the open and not buried under layers and layers of obfuscation. For your average human, contracts are written in the language of legal obfuscation.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    70. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Talahamut · · Score: 1

      Signal Strength is generally rated on a 125 point scale with Dish Network (100 points with DirecTV if memory serves)

      Which means, of course, that the EchoStar satellite signals are "25% Stronger than the leading brand!!"

    71. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a DVR Time/Warner combo and it does do time shifting. I can pause, rewind, record and fastforward. I have the opposite situation: I'm not allowed to do this with video on demand. I guess when they say 24hr time limit, they mean it.

      Its biggest flaw is that it's not a tivo. That said I still enjoy using it since it does the basics. I do miss one feature: with my old cable box I was able to put in an alert telling me when a show was on. Now I can only record a shows in the future. Yes I know that's the idea, but I enjoy watching live sporting events.

      But over all I have a pretty good deal which includes roadrunner for internet access.

      I think the only real consideration is which more available to you. I live in an apartment on the ground floor and don't have a clear southern view( I haven't talked to the land lord about roof access since I noticed my neigboors on the 2nd floor use a tripod with their dish)

      - thks

    72. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by second+class+skygod · · Score: 2, Funny

      Signal Strength is generally rated on a 125 point scale with Dish Network (100 points with DirecTV if memory serves)

      So, basically, you're saying that your signal strength dial goes to 11? Cool!

      scsg

    73. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by spiedrazer · · Score: 1
      Another Advantage of the Dish DVR (they call it PVR) system is this. Their receiver has a standard modulated (channel 3 or 4)output as well as the component, S-Video & other outputs. So, If you are wired correctly you can watch the DVR output from any TV in the house, not just the one by the dish receiver.

      As a Bonus the remote is RF as well as IR, so you CAN control the receiver from other rooms. I can control the downstairs receiver from my upstairs bedroom. It seems to work best if I hold it against my head (Not sure why) but only my wife see's how stupid I look!

      I would defenitely go with digital sattelite!!!

      --
      Keep passing the open windows...
    74. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      DirecTV does carry porn -- and some of the channels are the same as Dish Network. They have Playboy, Spice, and three hardcore channels. From what I hear, Dish will show more (namely: anal), but DirecTV does carry porn (channels 594 - 598)

      I have always wondered just how hard core the hard core is on these channels. Is it the type of hard core you get in some hotel rooms where 'hard core' means that the couple are really having sex but you can't see it because there is a blob in the way?

      I just don't feel curious enough to pay $20 to find out.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    75. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by nate1138 · · Score: 1

      Do you feel clever being the 50th person to point that out? Have you never read a bit of text and completely missed a word? Are you some kind of godlike being with your amazing grasp on the obvious? Is your life so sad and pathetic that you have nothing better to do than to point out the shortcomings of others? Piss off.

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    76. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1
      "and fast-forward up until the "live point""
      But wouldn't it be so much more useful if you could fast-forward past that point? Think about the gambling implications. You'd be a millionaire!
      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    77. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Aiku1337 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you have the same DVR that I do (Scientific Atlanta), after you have set the DVR to record the entire series, press the List button on your remote and then press the B button. That will take you to "series manager". You can then fine tune some options for the series you wish to record. You can tell it to record only first run episodes, or to fix your problem, to record that show only when it plays at a certain time and only on that channel.

    78. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs uncut porn channels? Forget cable,

      Now there are free boobs on the superbowl!

      Woo hoo!

    79. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Aiku1337 · · Score: 1

      I guess I should have replied to your first problem too. I'm not really sure if I have a solution for that though. If you're watching a certain show and have to leave, just go into the guide and hit record on that show. It'll record from that point until the end of the program... at least it does for me. In fact, I'm pretty sure just hitting record from the show will just store that show. After the show is done, say you come back 2 hours later, you'll have some recorded info in there, but thats just in its buffer. It's not stored for later playback.

    80. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by jpcampbell · · Score: 1

      I live in Houston where thunderstorms are a part of life. I have DishNetwork and it goes offline with almost every storm we have. My normal signal is very high (>120), so the argument of only dropping 20 points mentioned in other posts doesn't really seem to be the case.

      It is very annoying. I still won't switch to cable though, as they don't offer enough channels and are more expensive overall. I do have cable for internet though, and it is wonderful.

      jpc

    81. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by slaker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have full-time playboy on DirectTV (more precisely, the guy who shares my duplex does, but I pay him for a receiver so...).

      Playoby's offerings are FAR different from what they were 5 years ago. In that time, Playboy has eaten the Spice Network, home to harder-core material than the T&A stuff playboy is known for (and, if I can digress for a moment: That's the stuff I like. I don't want to see some guy's hairy ass, looking like he got out of prison that morning, pawing at Tera Patrick or Carmen Luvana. Give me T&A and I'm a happy guy).

      Used to be, you didn't see penetration on Playboy. Now you do, even in some of the Playboy-branded content. I've seen gonzo-type movies and I've seen unedited titles from the major US porn studios (mostly Vivid, but also Wicked, VCA et al). No Max Hardcore, no "1200 Anal Cumshots", no interracial degradation porn, no midgets, but if your tastes run to something a woman might conceivably watch with you, Playboy is a pretty good deal. Cost is IIRC $12 a month, same as HBO. I think a four hour block of adult PPV on direcTV is $5 or $7.

      "Totally Busted" and "The Naked News" are both pretty worthwhile for entertainment value. The "Are my Boobs crooked?" bit that's advertised on iFilms.com came from "Totally Busted".

      Now, the day I can get Playboy in HDTV, I'll finally invest in a directv subscription of my own.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    82. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by limitations · · Score: 1

      I have been using satellite for quite a few years. Occasionally the signal will drop out about once or twice a month, and after one particularly annoying dropout (end of fb game), called them up and said, "since i wasn't able to watch half my game, i should only pay you half" and they said sure.

      --
      where am i ...?
    83. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a lot of trouble with pigeons blocking my dish. They love to land on it and that does block it. Also, when the microwave is running 40' away, the signal cuts out.

    84. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by mregit · · Score: 2, Informative

      For a short time I had satellite and lived under the flight path for a local airport. Planes flying overhead do block out the signal for a moment. It just pauses and scrambles the picture, but occasionally it happens at a moment when someone is saying something important. "Important News Bulletin for residents of FUZZZZZZZZZZZ more on tonights news at 6." The biggest problem was not having television during cloudy weather - it doesn't have to be raining where you are, there just has to be enough moisture in the sky to block reception. What good is TV if you don't have it on rainy days when the kids are inside? I dropped satellite when my term was up and will never go back.

    85. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Nutria · · Score: 1
      Cable -- Bigger rate increases -- Crappy customer service (getting better)

      Can't talk for anyone else, but Cox in New Orleans is cheap ($43 for Extended Basic: ~60 channels in analog), and the quality of service is so good, that even if their customer service is crappy, I'd never notice, because their services (TV, Internet [~2Mbps d/l speed] & digital phone) are extremely reliable.

      We've called them out twice. Once for a cut cable, and the other for fuzziness in the high channel numbers that turned out to be faulty installation by a 3rd party. They came out quickly, at no charge, and solved the problems rapidly.

      Non-disclaimer: no, I don't work for Cox, and am in no way affiliated with it.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    86. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      My 2 cents looks like this. Generally when I lose signal on the old satellite do to weather I don't give a damn at the moment. I'm to busy running to the basement...

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    87. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Clearly your antenna wasn't aligned well because the only time I lose my satellite signal is during a serious thunderstorm... and even then it's seldom longer than a few minutes.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    88. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Spruitje · · Score: 1

      Well, the problem with cable is that it is available everywhere.
      In the Netherlands about 93% of all households have cable.
      Not surprising because it's between 12 and 15 euro's a month for 25 to 45 channels.
      (that's between 15 and 19 dollars a month).
      Only problem is, is that DVR's are very expensive.
      A JVC DVR with a 80 Gb disk is around 590 euro and that is one of the cheapest available.
      Yes, it also has a DVD drive so you can also watch DVD's but it's too expensive.

    89. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by babyrat · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you didn't get the "HD" PVR for $99 - you got the normal version, which is nice, but not HD.

    90. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1

      me too!

      Seriously, the dual lines is extremely nice to have, particularly when the wife and I both aggressively stack up things to record and there's a lot of overlap. Dual lines means that we can both be recording something time and watch something already recorded together all at once. I just wish I'd gone for the larger HD ;)

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

    91. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      SW Florida here: My sister had a sattelite receiver. I think it was DirecTV but maybe somehting else. She would complain all summer that her reception would get really lousy with the summer rain storms in the afternoon.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    92. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only my wife see's how stupid I look!

      I wouldn't be so sure...

      Be afraid... be very afraid...

    93. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I just want to agree with that... I tried Dishnetwork for about seven months, and during that time we only lost reception once during a REALLY bad storm, one that caused a cable outage as well. The only difference is that, after a couple of minutes, I got reception back on the dish and it was about 30 minutes before they fixed the cable.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    94. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      It's not available everywhere, and there are a lot of places where it will never be economically viable.

    95. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

      If that works, I owe you dinner, or something. I've been using it for a long time, and that's been one of my major gripes. You might well have made a happier man out of me.

      -9mm-

    96. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by mregit · · Score: 1

      DirecTV came out and set it all up. The signal was always in the high 90s and we had an excellent picture, WHEN we had a picture. But honestly, during the rainy Florida summers, we did not have TV. It didn't just blink off for a few minutes during a thunderstorm. As soon as the sky turned grey we'd lose signal on all but a few local channels, and it would stay out. It was not at all unusual to lose tv for the entire day, and often several days in a row. Trust me, I called them about it and they just shrugged it off - yeah, you lose signal in the rain. After my year's contract was up I got cable and have no problems.

    97. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by PatMouser · · Score: 1

      That's nice. I'm paying $53.09 for DirecTV's Total Choice Plus (~130 channels IIRC + Local) on THREE receivers.

      So, for ten bucks more I've got TONS more channels, including ones I actually watch like Sci-Fi, History, BBC America, etc.

      Methinks you should shop around, you're being overcharged.

    98. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've not noticed "Bigger rate increases" with cable. That sounds like marketing speak. In fact, I've looked into satellite and it costs a bit more than cable at the low end (basic channels) and it's about the same at the high-end. Cable is definately not more expensive.

      Customer service? I dunno, my cable (Cox) has been so perfect that I've only delt with them twice in the last 10 years. Once was to replace a faulty cable box (no problems) and the other was to fix the MAC address on the router for my cable modem (again, no problems and they were pretty nice if not always knowledgable).

      Also, with cable I run at least 4 TV's, 2 PVR's, plus my cable modem all off the same line. No way in hell I could do that with satellite.

    99. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by mjpaci · · Score: 1

      Go to American Sattelite and look at their DirecTV with Tivo packages. That's who I used and am very happy with my DirecTV service and my DirecTiVO. 40 hours is 40 hours as the TiVO records the DirecTV stream and decodes it when you watch it so there is no decode-encode-decode problem that you have with standalone TiVO. Packages start at $80 equipment and install included.

    100. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by veneficus · · Score: 1

      Something everyone needs to remember:

      Where do you think the cable company gets their broadcasts? Oh yeah. Satellite.

      And (from my experience in the local philly area) most of the cable "substations" have dishes about the size of directv dishes receiving the signal.

      Food for thought there. If Satellite TV really sucked that bad, the cable providers wouldn't be using satellite.

      One other thing to think about... If satellite was as bad as cable providers claimed, directv would be out of business, as would echostar or dish network or whatever they're calling themselves today.

      Yeah, cable companies are scared of losing your business, John Q. Public. That's what all this hub-bub about satellite is from.

      (disclaimer: I have cable. I've seen satellite. I've talked to satellite owners. They never have problems nearly to the extent that the ads claim-- they once had to cut back a tree because the foliage was so thick it was obstructing the signal for their dish. That's about it.)

      --
      -- Hey, what the hell, it's only slashdot..
    101. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have Dish network and I use their PVR player (like a TiVo) You can pause Live TV. A definate plus in my book. We use that to pause at the begining of a show so we can skip comercials during the show. And you can set it to record a show for viewing later. We use this all of the time.

      In the 8 years I have been with Dish, I have NEVER lost a signal due to weather. Rain or snow. In setting up the dish, I make sure to get a signal above 100. Once during a blizzard, I checked the signal, and it was 50 but the picture was fine and no issues with the audio.

    102. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      TiVo will work, but to my knowledge, you need one specifically for satellite

      Your knowledge is incorrect. Every stand-alone TiVo ever sold (mine's a first-generation 14-hour model) will work with satellite (either Dish Network or DirecTV). It will also work with cable (either analog or digital), or with rabbit ears (analog only). It's for this very reason that I recommend the stand-alone for anyone who is not 100% certain that he intends to stick with [insert satellite provider here] for the foreseeable future.

      The stand-alone boxes are more easily hacked as well, with room for a couple drives, a network card, etc.

      (You do give up any hope of recording two programs at the same time with the stand-alone models... but in most cases you can just use your old VCR to catch a second program.)

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    103. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by SirKirby · · Score: 1

      I have some experience tuning the eliptical dish from directv (which is required to receive 100% of content including HD) and have found that an 80% + signal on any or all transponders will get you though most weather scenarios (technically a 50% signal will work). The only time I experienced intermittent blackouts was before a large thunder storm when the sky was severly overcast.

      At my current configuration I have achieved a 92% signal on transponder A, 98% on B, and only a 65% signal on C (which is HD and other). I have not given up on C yet!

      According to DirecTv the highest expected signal in my location (south-eastern michigan) is 85%

      My experience with directv's HD content has been very good less some audio difficulties with the latest channel (CBS HD).

    104. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by japhmi · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was watching the news at a friends house over new years (while we were snowed in). We started to get a 'loosing conection to sat 1' error. The guy took a broom and got the snow out of the actual dish, and we were good (sat internet too).

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    105. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Aiku1337 · · Score: 1

      Haha, cool. Good luck on it. I didn't figure it out by myself. My girlfriend was messing around with settings and saw these options. And here I thought i was the geek of the house. Now, the only problem you'll face is when the unit decides not to let you play your recorded shows. It's happened about 3 times to me. The only solution is to walk away and hope that in an hour or two you'll be able to play them. If this happens again, I'm calling TWC and demanding they give me a few months of free service, or I'll get a Tivo 2. Supposedly it works on digital cable.

    106. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by michael_cain · · Score: 1
      The consensus on rec.video.satellite.dbs seems to be that weather really doesn't affect image quality (though this may not be true for HD content) but that airplanes, helicopters, birds and people falling off of your roof can and do.

      I've heard reports from some friends in areas where it snows in the winter that snow and ice on the dish don't seem to matter, but that when it starts to melt so there's liquid water running over it, the picture quality goes to hell. No big deal if your dish is mounted where you can walk over and brush the snow off after a storm, but might be a problem if it's mounted up high.

    107. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by prell · · Score: 1

      re: Point 01:

      I've been watching something, and had to leave (like you), and actually this happened semi-frequently, especially if you're into movies. What I did was: Open the guide program; select the show you're watching (it is already selected by default); hit record.

      This will start a recording of the current show, prepending the recording with the "cache backup" (cool). And, I have an inkling that it did this automatically, if I just hit "record" during the show, without bringing up the guide. I could be wrong, though. As I mentioned in my original post, the PVR will hold a finite amount of backup cache, the minimum being whenever you started watching the show, the maximum being whatever is pre-set on the box (I believe it was two hours, for me). Note that this has a potentially saddening side effect: Switch channels by accident, and say bye-bye to all your backup cache.

      re: Point 02:

      For shifting schedules, I can't really help you. I really couldn't say whether the PVR used "intelligent" tracking of shows (based on ID rather than time slot), but I do know that I scheduled recordings of Seinfeld and King of the Hill, and it was able to (after asking me), record ALL INSTANCES of that show, not just the one I selected (or that "time slot"). This seems to bother you, but it never bugged me at all. Again, I would assume that if a show had an "ID," the PVR would track according to that. I know that in paper TV listings, you can get "VCR+" numbers, or whatever they're officially called. Can anyone comment on this, in regards to the TWC guide program?
      When you can't find work, and love movies, you learn a lot about PVRs, I suppose :-)

    108. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by zentu · · Score: 1
      Ummmm. DirectTV was the biggest (single) provider of porn to the world for the past 2 or three years...

      Or so I have heard.

    109. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by TGK · · Score: 1

      Since we're doing the Dish Receiver Model Rundown....

      301 & 311 -- 1 Tuner, 1 Output
      322 -- 2 Tuner, 2 Output
      501,508,510 -- 1 Tuner, 1 Output, DVR
      522 -- 2 Tuner, 2 Output, DVR, will allow 1 output mode with new software
      721 -- 2 Tuner, 1 Output, DVR
      811 -- 1 Tuner, 1 Output, HD
      921 -- 2 Tuner, 1 Output, HD, DVR

      The real advantage of the *22 series is that the charges don't double up. Example, to wire two rooms with 2 301's requires a 4.99 additional outlset fee. With a 322 that fee doesn't exist. With a 522 it's actualy a bit nicer, as you pay only one service fee on the DVR instead of the two you'd be paying normaly for 2 DVR locations. You also get to cut out the other 4.99 fee as well.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    110. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Hallow · · Score: 1

      DirecTV and DishNet both carry porn.

      Anyway....

      Comcast has a PVR, they're supposedly starting to roll it out. People in the county next to me have them. Even records HD. Streams digital channels straight to disk (no re-encoding at the box), but it will encode non-digital channels.

      In my experience, Comcast compresses their channels way too much (LOTS of artifacts, all the time), and I often experience lost or partially lost frames, resulting in heavy pixelation and a screen that looks like scrambled tv (often during bad weather). Their customer service and sales folks tend to be rude, IMHO, and their website sucks (you can't change your package, order new services, etc. - all you can do is sign up for brand new service and view or pay your bill, and half of that is broken.

      As far as DirecTV went, I've had a much better experience. I would occassionally experience an outage because of a storm, mostly because my dish wasn't aimed just right (I aimed it myself manually, and didn't have it secured very well). In my first apartment where I had it professionally aimed, I never had a problem except during severe thunderstorms coming from a particular direction, which was ok because I always lost power shortly thereafter anyway. Their customer service was always friendly and helpful, and you can do just about everything right there from the website. I wouldn't have dropped my service had my wife and I not needed more space and more money (cheaper place, with no "private" outside space with line of sight).

      In fact, a friend of mine who's got HD and comcast's HD tuner recently remarked that my satellite signal on my old sony wega tv (non-hd) looked better, had less artifacts, etc. than comcast's HD!

    111. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by sjames · · Score: 1

      They did it wrong! I've had DirecTV for several years now. I did have problems after a few years because of a bush nearly overgrowing the dish. Wet leaves are very reflective to EM in the satellite signal's range. If leaves are in the way, you can have a very strong signal that goes away at the slightest hint of mist.

      Once I moved the dish away from the bush (because I liked the bush), no problem. I have decentish reception even in a hail storm now. Neighbor's cable signal starts to break up in a light rain.

      I have found that the newer antennas are much improved over the old ones. Just changing out the antenna/LNB gave me about a 10% boost in signal AND less sensitivity to alignment. When I moved the dish, I just pointed it approximatly in the right direction (eyeballed it) and got a signal. Minor tweaking to get maximum signal took all of 30 seconds.

      My setup is not quite ideal. My antenna cable is 20 feet longer than the recommended max, and I used a PVC pipe as a mast rather than a metal one, but it hasn't been a problem.

      I'm guessing that they didn't get a clear line of sight, or munged the coax connection.

    112. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

      *zoom into DirecTv customer Support*

      Rep: Hello This is DirecTV customer support how may I help you?

      Customer: Hi I got a Boeing 747 from Northwest Airlines blocking my satellite signal, can you do something about it?

      Rep: Airplanes don't block satellite signals sir, but how do you know it's Northwest Airlines?

      Customer: 'cuz the airplane is in my backyard, apparently it crashed and all...

      Rep: Hold on I'll call 911 and the FAA, once the airplane is clear you'll get your service back

      Customer: GOD DAMN THIS CRAPPY SERVICE!!! I'M GOING BACK TO CABLE WHERE THINGS ARE DONE RIGHT!!!

      --
      ...in bed
    113. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by spiedrazer · · Score: 1
      I believe that, in most markets, DIGITAL cable is more than Digital sattelite for the most basic packages. You can still get Analog cable for less, again in mosts markets.

      --
      Keep passing the open windows...
    114. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by sjames · · Score: 1

      Understand that I live so close that the airport authority sound proofed my house for free. The planes are pretty low.

      That would do it for sure. A big aluminium object in the air that close will cast a nice shadow in that frequency range.

    115. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, they do offer Spice HDTV.

    116. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Satellite extra charges per receiver isn't much different than Cable in many places, because there is no standard for digital that can be built into TVs (yet). To make matters worse, Comcast (and probably others) have been chopping into analog channels to add more digital channels, so unless you're getting a fairly basic package, you will need to rent digital receivers (I say rent because I have not seen any for purchase).

      Some areas are even going digital-only for cable (I have heard of one, at least).

      Aside from that, you're pretty much dead-on for what I've learned from my 10+ years of Cable and 2+ months of Satellite. I actually was using Comcast cable, phone, and internet but, due to wanting a static IP, was forced to change the phone to the incumbent (required by Speakeasy, the only provider that offers static IPs to residential customers in my area) and internet to DSL to get it (Comcast doesn't offer them). Speaking of, I found that Qwest rates are now lower than Comcast phone rates for comparable service... I decided then to go Comcast-free and get Satellite. I never was much impressed by Comcast, especially after they decreased my download/upload speeds to match their "standard service speeds" and then jacked up their prices a couple of months later... I now hear they've increased download and upload back to where it was (or somewhere thereabouts) and touting it as much faster speeds - LOL.

      Anyhow, I get less channels with Satellite, but pay a bunch less, as well (99% of 'em I never watch, anyway). As for reliability, I never really had many problems with either dish or cable aside from brief interruptions here and there. My power still goes out occasionally, too, so I'm not going to cry about 15 minutes of lost service once in a while.

    117. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by flafish · · Score: 1

      "The consensus on rec.video.satellite.dbs seems to be that weather really doesn't affect image quality (though this may not be true for HD content) but that airplanes, helicopters, birds and people falling off of your roof can and do. That said, it supposedly causes only minor artifacting (which you're going to get anyways given the aggressive compression the providers use... watch Star Trek: TNG on Spike TV sometime and watch the signal lose sync everytime somebody fires a phaser.)"
      Too bad all those people are wrong. If you live in S. Fla or NW Washington state, it is a well known fact that the rain storms we get will knock it out for up to an hour at a time depending on the storm. And as we are in the flight path for MIA, HARB, and Homestead General Aviation airports, the airplane, bird, and helicopter bit should affect us and it does not.
      10' dish suffers very few drop outs, has NASA TV, other channels of interest and can get HBO, etc... too but requires a stand alone TiVo or VCR. DirectTiVo units are about the best compromise you can get at present time. We have 3 with 2 more regular DSS receivers and 1 4DTV unit for the 10 footer. Can't watch any local tv unless it is Channel 6 as we are blocked by their tower. (Signal so strong you don't need an antenna at all on channels 4, 5, and 6.) Use the DSS one for the local ones too!

    118. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by JacobO · · Score: 1

      I don't have Dishnetwork, but I do have the Canadian equivalent (I believe they use the same equipment) - Bell ExpressVu. When I first got the service, I guess it hadn't been installed too well because it went out occasionally (less than the local digital cable tho), now with a newly installed dish at my current abode, it never seems to go out.

      I am told that they increase the signal strength in bad weather (or where the weather is known to be bad over some large area of the country), apparently that makes a big difference.

      There are a couple of reasons I prefer Satellite over Digital Cable, firstly the quality looks better (maybe not as aggressive compression vs. cable company) and secondly I don't trust Rogers in the slightest, oh and their cable costs more. Rogers are all smiles when you sign up for their service, but I cancelled my cable modem service recently as my preferred DSL service became available and since then I've had threatening mail to pay my remaining bill (I paid it) and a cable guy snooped around my house because he didn't believe that we did not have cable TV (he apparently wanted to disconnect something we do not have.)

      ahem... anyway, I like my satellite service, so long as your installation is good you shouldn't have any real problem with reception. It seems to work fine down to really low signal strength such as when you have a snowstorm.

    119. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by syates21 · · Score: 1

      Where did you get the info that you would be able to pick up a $99 HD-DVR if you are not already a subscriber?

    120. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Polo · · Score: 1

      tivo advantages: has much better intelligence figuring out what to record. It's way better than dish, but it's not perfect (the superbowl ran over but tivo cut off the end!)

      dish advantages: doesn't wimp out on the features, stuff like the skip-forward button for skipping over commercials, and no telephone connection is necessary.

      It also has more playback speeds: 1/15x 1/4x, 1x, 4x, 15x, 60x, 300x.

      dish disadvantages: bugs
      dish has always had annoying bugs - like when I reload the program schedule, it never seems to finish, etc.

    121. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Best+ID+Ever! · · Score: 1

      Yeah -- I've got TW too and I have no idea what the original poster means by not being able to time-shift. It's not as good as a TiVo, but it's a perfectly functional DVR. It's pretty sweet if you've got something like NBA league pass -- you really get your money's worth.

      My biggest complaint is the lag between switching channels. They really need to reduce it for us channel surfers.

      The other gripe I have is no HD, but the HD one is supposed to come out in May, according to our cable guy. Of course, it's not really worth it until they get ESPN HD.

    122. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by DocDendrite · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I presently draw a paycheck from Echosphere, parent company of Echostar, parent company of Dish Network

      Are you sure you work there? I couldn't find any reference to a currently existing company called Echosphere. Nevermind the fact that Echostar Communications Corporation isn't a subsidiary company at all. The references to Echosphere on the web seem to indicate it is the same company as Echostar not the parent.
      -DD

    123. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by xpurple · · Score: 1

      I had DirectTV for quite a while and it never went out on me unless it was snowing really badly. And then it was only due to the weight of the snow causing the dish to bend down and lose the signal. Going outside and brushing the snow off the dish fixed it right up every time.

      --
      http://www.xpurple.com
    124. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by jdaily · · Score: 1

      > And talk about stupid birds...

      Yeah, I couldn't make any honest assertion about the number of birds falling off my roof, although I did see one hit my office building at full speed this summer.

      Not even a window, just the building itself. Poor thing died instantly.

    125. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      Only time I've ever lost reception with my Direct TV dish was when a wind storm blew the dish over. Since I live in an apartment complex we can't bolt anything down so we attacked it to a bar stool and marked on the floor where to put it back. Works nicely. I also live 5 miles for Phoenix Sky Harbor airport and planes never ruin my reception. Maybe my experience with satellite is rare.

    126. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1
      Well 5h!T !!!

      So much for browsing /. at work and claiming it is "informative" if someone gets mother hen on you and tells you to look more busy.

      Intersting how much P04N gets people going on this thread.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    127. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      I'd agree with your guess and its nice to see someone else having the same experience as I have.

      In my apartment complex we can't bolt anything down, so we bolted it to a bar stool and set it down . Found where it went, placed some marks on the ground, now whenever we need to the move the dish or the wind blows it over we just set it right back and no other form of weather even phases it. There are lot of places to go wrong and the line of sight is really a big deal. We had high 80's and 90's on most transceivers except for a few which has 50's. So we tweaked and go the low signal channels into the 60's and 70's and enjoy great reception once again. Spose its all in the effort and how much thought ya put into it.

    128. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by oscarcar · · Score: 1

      If you cover your dish you won't lose signal.

      I have mine on my balcony, and whenever we lose signal due to rain, I just go out and wipe the receiver with a towel. What happens is, once it gets drenched in water, the water dripping over the receiver causes interference. It can be raining ferociously outside, but if I reach out and wipe it clean, we'll get reception again until it gets wet again.

      The wiping is no real solution, but if you covered the dish ( so that it's covered on all sides except where it's pointing, it would negate this problem. It would also negate the other problem that causes bad reception: the wind.

    129. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by F1re · · Score: 1


      I have lost service four times in a year for about an hour each. The good thing is that three of those times it hailed about 10 minutes after the service was lost so now my wife and I joke that it's our hail early warning system!

      This is in Australia with Austar.

      --
      ...there is no sig...
    130. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by ostiguy · · Score: 1

      Comcast is chopping analog channels because they eat so much bandwidth. 1 analog channel is the space of 4 digital, or 2 HD channels, or some such. THis is a big problem for comcasters who are in massachusetts, as this system was built out with gear that has less total capacity than some of their other states, therefore adding HD channels in MA has required some juggling.

      LG is now selling a hd digital cable box + hdtv terrestrial tunel + upconverting 1080i/720p dvd player box for 500ish - jandr is out of them. Don't know if they sell non HD digital cable ones. This one cannot descramble premium channels, but just for basic HDTV cable + HDTV analog tuner + high end dvd player it is a really intriguing device that I stumbled across today

    131. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I used to be at precisely the wrong spot on the ground, so planes would often fly in the path of my dish. Same thing, a momentary glitch would appear and go away.

      You also have to take into consideration the angel you are pointed vs the clouds in the sky. If there is a giant storm with a "thunder head" (whatever they are called) that extends miles into the sky, it will block your signal while miles and miles away. The actual local humidity should not cause a problem, though.

      For anyone who wants to be a satellite geek, I would suggest heading over to Ebay and getting an in-line signal meter. They tend to respond a lot faster than the GUI based one, and can help you tweak the dish.

      Personally, I suspect you had a problem with a cable or bad LNB. If the dish goes down due to humidity, then it's probably the humidity causing a resistance problem internally.

      I have used the basic dish, a 28" aftermarket dish, and a HDTV oval dish. The HD and oversized dishes are superior to the 18" basic. Well worth the investment, mind you an HD dish requires an extra adjustment (think: twist side to side) for it to work. A real pain in the butt your first time. Premium cabling will save precious signal, so something else to consider.

    132. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by jafac · · Score: 1

      1. Make sure your TiVO works with whatever settop box you're getting from the Satellite provider FIRST (if your set top box doesn't have it's own built-in PVR). My TiVO didn't work with Dish, back in the day. So I returned my TiVO, and upgraded my Dish box. The problem was the IR Channel codes. TiVO complained that Dish wouldn't share the info with them. My take: if TiVo didn't grease the right palms, screw em.

      2. 9 out of 10 kittens recommend Cable.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    133. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an in-house Time warner digital clable tele-tech support professional. I had the TW DVR box for about 4 monthat b4 there were announced to the public. - end of resume

      recording the show you are watching should be able to be done by simply pressing [REC] you should get a similar menu to recording through the guide (this show, all shows, etc.) choose "this show" and you should only get that show you can also ask it to record till the HD's full or you stop it.

      Yes if you want to record a series it will record any instance of that series not just a time slot. for instance if you record all of friends or the simpsons you should not be suprised when you HD's full after a week. both of those are on at least a few times a day, they will all be recorded.

      You can choose "Furst run only" so re runs won't record. so dont panic if you come hom late and somthing you wanted isn't there. It was just a rerun, the box isnt broke.

      The encoding decoding issues only occure when you are recording an analog channel (your basic stuf). Any digital channels in the 100 block or higher will recordein the same quality you would have watching them live.

      The best feature is the reason i never got a TiVO to begin with. record chanel A and watching chanel B. or even recording chanel A and B and watching chanel C you recorded last night.

      so I'm proly biased couse i get all this stuf for free but i know i wont move anyplace withought TWC.

      --
      Dont juge me by mi spelling
      - haijak

    134. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by M.+Silver · · Score: 1

      If you cover your dish you won't lose signal.

      Ours sits on the south side of the house (of course) under the overhang of the roof, where the weird additions (it's a 90-year-old house that's had four major additions put on) form a sort of alcove.

      So it's about as sheltered as it can get, short of putting it inside pointing out a window (which I've heard of). We can get rain fade when the rain's off to the south of us somewhere, despite getting really clear signals most of the time.

      I should, too, point out that we've got a pretty old dish. Newer ones don't seem to suffer from this even that much and, like I said, a 24"-ish dish, unprotected and from the same era, doesn't have the problem at all.

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
    135. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by tfoss · · Score: 1
      Playboy has eaten the Spice Network

      *Ahem*

      -Ted

      --
      -=-=- Quantum physics - the dreams stuff are made of.
    136. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in tahoe a month or so ago and the place i was staying had satellite (don't remember what provider) and snow definatly interfers with the signal. It could had been the snow stuck in the trees or maybe the light snow flurries (I think the trees had a lot to do with it), but we lost signal for three days.

      Even when the storm let up the signal didn't get any better for a few days.

      But in that area cable is just as bad a big storm kills cable too.

    137. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I don't know what DVR he is talking about but Tivo avoids this.

      You give it a show and a channel and a max number of eppisodes to record. It also has a record every episode, record every episode no duplicates, and a record only new episodes options.

      The grand parent was talking about whatever came with Adelphia cable, not Tivo, so I don't know if it has Linux internals even.

      It may distinguish between timeslots too (like simpson's Sunday vs weekdays) but if it does I am an idiot and using it wrong.

      PS I have had Tivo for like 2 weeks and love it and would call myself a Tivo fanboy now so take my post with a grain of salt.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    138. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cable
      -- Bigger rate increases
      -- Crappy customer service (getting better)
      -- Higher rates overall

      Satellite
      -- Equipment is your problem for the most part
      -- Local channels are extra (5.99 typically) and may not be offered in your area
      -- Extra charges per additional receiver.


      ummm, dude, have you talked to your call centers? I had nothing but trouble with them. I even had one of the SUPERVISORS tell me that it wasn't their problem that my check didn't get through their system in 2 weeks time and that they were still going to charge me a reconnect fee for an account that was only half month late and wouldn't have been if my check got through the system properly.

      I won't even go into the Home Advantage package as that's what I had and I was stuck with a crappy receiver that never got fixed until I told the support guys "either I get a new one or I'm cancelling" 1 FULL year after I started having my problem.

    139. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Airplanes can cause loss of signal. I used to live on one of the departure/approach paths at MSP and occasionally the signal was lost for a few seconds when an airplane was climbing out more or less in the beam path. But I think it's more likely that the receiver was being saturated by transmissions from the plane than the aircraft itself blocking the signal.

      One advantage over cable is that when you move you can have service immediately if you transfer the dish yourself, unlike cable where it may need to be "turned on" at the new location. But in our case, we used DishMover since it was already snowing as we were moving and I really didn't feel like climbing up on the icy roof to install the antenna -- the install tech took the time to do a really good job, better than I would have done with subzero windchills around me.

    140. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Bangback · · Score: 1

      I had DirecTV in a shipyard for a couple months. It worked great except when the ten story crane parked in front of it. Bummer. You'd see the picture break up and hope the crane was just passing by instead of parking. We would have preferred cable (at least we'd get networks) but the contract said TV, not network TV. Watched a lot of MTV2, mostly.

    141. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but for many of the stations, cable is sourced from analog C-band, which is where DBS providers *also* source their signal from, before they compress the living fuck out of it, so that's no benefit of DBS, that benefit only applies if you have a big dish and receive analog C-band. Sure, there have been some moves made towards digital distribution, I believe some channels like CourtTV are digitally sent to the headend, but for the most part it's scrambled VCII+ or even in the clear in the case of TechTV.

      Note that this applies to analog cable, it's my understanding that headends don't actually encode the digital stations themselves, but receive the signal already encoded from the dish, most likely encrypted.

    142. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure you work there?

      Actually, yes...well, I'm not the same guy that posted that, but I work for the Dish group in Atlanta--one of the main UI guys for the new 811 (hey, don't complain; the Powers That Be in Denver told us to make it look and act like that). Anyway, the pay stubs do say EchoSphere.

    143. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by sjames · · Score: 1

      Now that you mention it, aircraft radar would likely disrupt the reciever. Good point!

      Can't blame you for hiring an installer in sub-zero temps with ice. I would too :-)

    144. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that by hidden charges they are probably meaning the extra taxes and stuff charged by the local area.
      Example:
      Cable where I live (after last rate hike, before we switched to Sat)
      $30/month(advertised rate) + $10-15 in local fees(listed if you looked/dug through the material they(Cable Co.) sent) = $40-45/month (all analog, ~70 channels).

      Sat:
      $32/month(advertised), and no local fees = $32/month for similar service, except channels via a digital feed. (getting locals over antenna(analog) as they aren't offered over the sat yet anyway(+$5/month if they were and wanted them). A few channels like community channels(no surprise) and NWCN aren't availble via sat either).

    145. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by MyHair · · Score: 1

      I live in Texas, the land of flash floods, and the most I've lost my signal for is an hour.

      I installed my mother's DirecTV system in North Texas a few years ago. We were in a hurry to get it working, so I "temporarily" mounted it on a heavy wooden workbench on the patio. The dish was pointed through a tree, but it was winter and the leaves were gone.

      I'm a master procrastinator, so that dish stayed on that workbench pointing through that tree for several years. She almost never lost signal, and certainly not for an hour, even when the tree--30 feet away and fully obscuring the line of sight--was full of leaves and it was raining and thundering heavy.

      From my very limited experience I believe a very firm dish mounting and precise pointing will avoid almost all weather problems. (Of course it doesn't snow much in North Central Texas.)

    146. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "Have you never read a bit of text and completely missed a word?"

      No, but next time I point out how the parent is wrong, I'd get my facts right. You even quote the parent in your own post.

      This is Slashdot. Did you think that getting a major fact wrong wouldn't cause you some criticism?

      "Have you never read a bit of text and completely missed a word?"

      Of course not. That's why I read the post multiple times *before* I reply. Often, while I am quoting text, I decide that I don't really have a point and abort my post. Posting incorrect information does no one any good. Get your facts straight before you post.
      "Are you some kind of godlike being with your amazing grasp on the obvious?"

      No. But I do pay attention to the post I am quoting before I go and rant about how wrong the parent is. Oh, and I don't go attacking people who point out my mistakes.

      " Is your life so sad and pathetic that you have nothing better to do than to point out the shortcomings of others?"

      This is what I call "globalization". Because someone points out a flaw in your post, suddenly they have "...nothing better to do than to point out the shortcomings of others?". You are trying to give the impression that this is something I do for fun on Slashdot. It is not. But when someone posts information that is false, I correct them. When they ignore the post that they quote, I write "did you even read the post?". That is an acceptable and sensible response.

      "Piss off."

      Go fuck yourself, asshole.

    147. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      "Local channels are extra (5.99 typically) and may not be offered in your area".

      This is a matter of semantics. If you think you are getting your cable locals for free ask to just get the locals and see what they say. Dish & Direct charge for the locals separately giving you the option of having them or not.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    148. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by TGK · · Score: 1

      My understanding of the corporate structure is as follows...

      Echosphere is the root.

      Echostar and some hardware company are children of Echosphere. Echostar deals with the provider side of the operation. The hardware company makes (shocker) hardware.

      Dish Network is a child of Echostar, selling program to the masses. Other divisions of Echostar actualy do things like sign programing contracts etc. Very confusing.... I've given up trying to understand it and just happily cash my paycheck.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    149. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by bluethundr · · Score: 1

      I can honestly attest to the above statements as per image quality, the lack of need for conversion of formats between DirecTV and TiVO integrated units. The quality is outstanding!

      Not to mention that in addition to the need to convert from MPREG to analogue and back to MPEG using "digital" cable (resulting in inevitable loss of quality) is not the only thing to consider. A lerned fellow once told me that "digital" (and I use those quotes advisedly) cable is indeed digital from satellite to your local cable CO, but ANALOGUE from CO to your home on some cable systems. Which is then converted BACK to digital by your box.

      As to interference causing loss of signal to your satellite, I can only say that this has only happened less than a handful of times in over 3 years of service. In fact I would say it would be only 3 exact times in that period (that I was there to witness it). Of those 3 times ONCE was during a Noreaster (severe thunderstorms for those not from my area, I once confused a Californian with that term) and both of the other times were during BLIZZARDS (white stuff falling from the sky (LOTS OF IT!) for you Hawaiians ;).

      Prior to having DirecTV I had cable for something on the order of 20 years, since I was a child. Now, I don't know exactly how many times the cable went out in our household, but I can say with honesty that it seemed to happen far FAR more often than my direcTV has gone down (proportionately speaking. Come back to me in 20 years for a more scientific analysis!). And I remember ALWAYS having sub-standard quality images on my TV using cable. I've never used digital cable. But given my experiences with them and my overall loathing for their monopolistic business practices (I'm still not sure how such monopolies can exist legally!) I stay about as FAR away from cable as I can. I am at this point a dyed in the wool DirecTV head!

      Don't get me wrong though, as big a trekkie as I am (and I am indeed) no amount of DirecTV digital goodness will turn Enterprise into something worth watching!

      --
      Quod scripsi, scripsi.
    150. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by NateTech · · Score: 1

      It's highly unlikely that the plane "saturated" your receiver.

      The two transmitters on board the aircraft in use during a departure climbout (ARINC and Airphone use would be prohibited or unlikely at that time) would be a low VHF AM 5W transmitter (slightly higher power on air-carrier class aircraft) and a radar transponder.

      Both are far enough away in frequency from your SLD (silly little dish) receiver center frequency, that even if your Dish could "hear them" they'd be -80dBm to -120dBm weaker than the satellite if the aircraft were sitting in your front yard.

      Then you add that RF power drops off as a function of distance-squared, and that the aircraft is at a MINIMUM 1000' straight up (and since you can see him, he's probably more like 4000' slant-range or much much more away) there's virtually no way.

      Stick to the "probably blocking the signal" theory and you'll do fine... you're probably seeing both a direct blockage by the aircraft (remember there's a time delay in the buffers and the MPEG decoder, slight, but there...) and possibly some odd multipath effects as the aircraft's body moves through the "beam".

      --
      +++OK ATH
    151. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used DirecTV, Dish, and cable. The short is I had good luck with DirecTV and DishNetwork. Cable was fine too.. but less reliable than dish and it's now more expensive.

      The DirecTV dish was personally aimed; signal was about 92% in clear weather. In a normal steady rain it'd drop to like 70%.. in fog, maybe 65-70%. In heavy rain, maybe 30%. At 25-30% you can notice the picture is somewhat blockier, but there's no breakup yet. At 20-25%, you get a little breakup. Below 20%, it's dicey if you'll get a picture at all. I lost picture once because a tornado was in the path (about 5 miles away.) That lasted about 2 minutes. In heavy rain I'd get the odd block... I also got some blips from birds that would nest near the dish and fly in front. I did have a neighbor ask several times "Is your cable out too?" "Umm, no we have a dish and it's working". 8-)

      At my grandparent's house, it went out for about 10 minutes in flash-flood class rains (like an inch or two in 15 minutes).. it was professionally installed, and isn't aimed that well though.. it only gets about 75% signal in clear weather.

      I've got Dish Network now, because I moved and DirecTV would be right through some trees. The Dish unit is silly and claims 104% signal strength (yep, over 100%).. but it's similar in terms of signal drop from things (i.e. hard rain will drop it to like 30%, with slightly less clear picture and so on.) I've not had a signal loss yet, or annoying blockiness.

      With cable here, my parents had it. It'd go down sometimes.. not often though, they are like 8 blocks from the cable co office 8-). Some areas here apparently lose it quite often. They switched to Dish Network because the cable co raised rates too much. The cable co here still has some large dishes, but it's because it'd cost money to remove them. They actually have a Primestar dish doing the real reception. when my parents had cable, I did see picture breakup during very heavy rain once or twice (they didn't have digital cable.. so it wasn't blocking from that.)

    152. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Are any of the Dish DVR's with 2 outputs "smart" enough to know that one of the outputs is another recording device like a VCR for "copying" something from the DVR to media?

      Can any of them control an off-board VCR for "tape dumping" like this?

      --
      +++OK ATH
    153. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by MeanJeans · · Score: 1

      During snow you will experience signal loss, especially if your dish is at a higher angle of elevation. This is because snow will collect on the reflecting surface, blocking the signal.

      The higher your dish angle the nearer you are to the equator the less snow you should see.

      --
      =====
      imagetweak.netWeb-based image t
    154. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have Foxtel (an Australian satellite TV service) and my experience is considerably worse. _every_ time even the slightest bit of lightning can be seen on the horizon, the signal is lost, usually for hours at a time. Foxtel's line is "rain doesn't affect the signal", and I think they're telling the truth - when there's plenty of rain but no lightning, the signal comes in fine, so I'm guessing it's the electrostatic buildup in the clouds which kills it.

    155. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by sessamoid · · Score: 1

      How would you even know if you got satellite back before power?

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    156. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU STUPID FUCK!
      "DishNetwork's HD-DVR is already out, but it will set you back a cool thousand."

      CAN YOU R E A D???!!111!11oneone!11? HD-DVR IS NOT THE FUCKING SAME AS YOUR PUNNY "DishPVR" HD-DVR IS FUCKING HIGH DEFINITION!!! THATS SEVEN HUNDRED AND TWENTY LINES OF RESOLUTION

      TRY READING THE POSTS AND I duno uhmm....<B>THINKING!</B> *_BEFORE_* YOu HIT THE FUCKING SUBMIT BUTTON!!!!!...

      don't take the above personally, I'm just a /. troll having a bad day...well early morning I guess

      <evilaugh><B>MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA</B></ev il augh>

    157. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did I mention your sig is hysterical?

    158. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      When it comes to getting a signal, DirecTV can also boast an advantage over DishNetwork. We've had DirecTV for several years, and tried switching to DishNetwork because of a great offer. The problem is that with their system your dish must pick up signals from two satellites that are roughly 10 degrees apart in the southern sky, as opposed to picking up the DirecTv signal from a single satellite. Due to the neighbors trees, we were never able to get a good DishNetwork signal and ended up going back to DirecTv...

      And just remember that if you have a Tivo receiver, even in the rare instances where you lose signal, you should have plenty of stuff on the HD to tide you over.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    159. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed - their signal loss stuff is BS - I've had SAT for years now (way back before TIVO) and it has to be PITCH black out there to lose a signal.

      As far as TIVO, I have three hacked units with 100+ gigs in each. The only way to go.. I love my Tivos.

    160. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1
      I've only had experience with the DVR Time/Warner cable was offering and it wouldn't let you time-shift anything but PPV content
      Wha...? I have TW digital and their DVR lets me timeshift anything I want. Perhaps you had an earlier model?
    161. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      Good luck getting rid of Dish Network in the winter time, though. They come out and install it for you for free, but when you end your service they expect you to climb up on your icy roof and remove the LNB to send back to them, or else they bill you $150. You want a professional to come out and do it - $129. It's all a scam...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    162. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by nate1138 · · Score: 1

      If you are so thorough, why the fuck didn't you bother to read the half dozen other people that said the exact same thing you did?

      This is what I call "globalization"

      You ignorant cunt. Do you even know what that word means?

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    163. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by adman77 · · Score: 1

      I switched from cable to sat because of better content. My local cable company cut the music channels from 80 to 10, all country and western and Christian rock, all crap. They dropped BBC America (with one of the best shows ever, The Office), and they dropped OLN which carries a lot of European cycling - Tour de France - etc in the summer. When I called the cable company and asked why they had dropped all these services, they told me they had done focus groups and were providing what most people wanted. When I reminded them that one of the original reasons for cable was to provide people with more choices and not to settle for same old, same old dumb shit. They had no answer.
      Check the content of the various providers, then decide which has the most of what you want. Technically, there's very little difference.

    164. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1

      With Dish Mover you don't hire anyone, just call and they make an appt to send a service tech out to your house. No charge.

    165. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

      Didn't work. I don't know if you've got a different software or hardware version than I, but plain and simply, I don't have those options at all.

      Sorry. You'll have to buy your own dinner! ;)

      -9mm-

    166. Re:Satellite has one big advantage by hlygrail · · Score: 1

      Hogwash. We've been through 3 hurricanes on our dish and never lost signal for a moment. (Not including the eventual complete loss of power through some of them, though.) Having a good signal to begin with is critical, as is properly installing and aligning the dish. Conversely, others who had cable (and when we used to have cable as well) lost our cable TV signal (digital or analog, didn't matter) very early into the storm, making things pretty boring.

  2. Cable is great by tcgwebs · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use DVR with Time Warner Cable, which has always been just great for me. It has an 80GB HD and most features that you'd find in a Tivo.

    --
    Domain name registration for $8.79 per year
    879domains.co
    1. Re:Cable is great by nearlygod · · Score: 1

      What features does it have that a Tivo or ReplayTv doesn't have?

      --
      The Tools Of Ignorance wanna be a tool?
    2. Re:Cable is great by McSpew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What features does it have that a Tivo or ReplayTv doesn't have?

      According to many reviews posted to alt.video.ptv.tivo, its primary advantages are bugs, bugs and more bugs. Some reviews have mentioned coming home to find the entire drive erased, or to find problems with the scheduler either not recording scheduled programs or recording only small snippets of shows (1-2 minutes).

      There are apparently two major versions/codebases of software for the Scientific Atlanta Explorer 8000 DVRs, and some revisions apparently work better than others, but for the most part, even the favorable reviews have concluded that the SA-8000 DVRs don't yet compare well to more mature DVRs from Tivo and ReplayTV.

      I'm sure that over time, the SA-8000s and their derivatives will improve, but if you're comparing apples-to-apples today, you can do better than an SA-8000 from your cable company.

    3. Re:Cable is great by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      I beleive one of the big differences is that Tivos have the Season Pass functionality. I can't speak specifically about the SA boxes, but I know that's a major point of contention between Dish and DirecTV right now.

    4. Re:Cable is great by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Informative

      and most features that you'd find in a Tivo.

      I presume that you've never owned a TiVo before then.

      I'll admit -- I've never owned the Scientific Atlanta Explorer 8000 DVR (which is what the Comcast and TW boxes actually are), but there's a couple of good pages to read about the differences and just how feature poor the cable PVRs are.

      Want a quick summary? Very poor searching, amazingly poor recording management, poor conflict resolution, barely adequate playback controls, and crappy live tv support. Oh, and it's less stable to boot.

      The only upside is that the hardware is usually free and has a low monthly cost. That's great, except that Dish has a free PVR as well, and DirecTV with TiVo is only $99. Both have a monthly fee, but it's pretty much the same as the cable ones (and with DirecTV it's waived w/ the top of the line package). Oh, and that fee is once per household, not once per unit -- at least for sat.

      And, of course, the signal quality is better over sat than it is from cable -- particularly for the analog channels (usually anything under 100, sometimes anything under 80, depends on your cable carrier).

      Personally, I switched from my cable company (Charter) to DirecTV last October. My picture quality went up, I added about a dozen channels, and my monthly charge went down. Even with the forthcoming DirecTV price increases (all of $3 for me -- I can't think of a cable hike that was that little) I'll be paying less for more. Oh, and unlike cable, my TV doesn't go out randomly or with any really severe storm.

    5. Re:Cable is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have whatever Cox gives you for their DVR service, I think it is a Scientific Atlanta box. It is a 50 hour box, although I have never actually verified that this is how much you can record.

      The 'nice' thing about this box is that it has 2 tuners, so you can watch while recording, etc. You are supposed to be able to watch a prerecorded show (or a currently-recording show) while using both tuners, however my experience has been that every time I have tried to do this the box has crashed. This sucks because it takes it about 2 minutes to come back on and another minute after that before you can tune/record anything. I don't try to watch while recording 2 shows anymore. The other bad thing about having the 2 tuners is that you have 2 tuners. This means that your roommate can very easily record soccer and 'Aqua Teen Hungerforce' at the same time, thereby restricting my viewing choices to two of my least favorite programs in the entirety of the television universe.

      The quality of the recorded show is not as good as the live stream, but it is not different enough to be really awful.

      I had the regular digital tuner for about a month before the DVR was released. After I got the DVR, I immediately noticed something really terrible - the DVR box tunes about 3x more slowly than the regular box. This means that you will never change channels by actually tuning through the channels - you will always just tune through the channel guide. Also, my DVR box will just stop accepting numbers sometimes when I try to key in a channel directly. Example - I want to tune to channel 41 which requires '041'. After entering 0 it will 'stop', then several seconds later it will change to channel '0' and then '41' will appear. The 'enter' button that was conveniently next to the channel numbers on the standard remote is all the way on the opposite end of the remote with the DVR, making '4,1,enter' impractical.

      I'm sure I could go on and on about the things I don't like about the DVR.

  3. DSL is not broadband? by unigeek · · Score: 1, Informative

    I don't need broadband Internet (I use DSL),???

    I thought DSL was broadband?

    1. Re:DSL is not broadband? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How in the hell is the parent Flamebait? Looks like mods haven't had their coffee.

    2. Re:DSL is not broadband? by dcocos · · Score: 1

      I guess s/he could have been more precise by saying "I don't need to factor broadband in to my decision because I have DSL and I'm not going to change that" so that unigeek would understand

    3. Re:DSL is not broadband? by kelnos · · Score: 1

      -1, overly nitpicky, pedantic, and annoying

      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
    4. Re:DSL is not broadband? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is the hell the parent Overrated? Add here the part about coffie as other did.

  4. Directv beats cable by eyegor · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've had Directv for about 4 years and overall I'm very happy. Around here (Northern Virginia) our cable provider sucks and I don't have to give them a cent for providing their usually lousy service.

    Directv signal is usually very good but I have had problems with loss of signal during severe thunderstorms and when snow covers the dish.

    Other than that, I'm pretty happy with my satellite service.

    --

    Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    1. Re:Directv beats cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, with my parents dish it's rare to have it go out more than once or twice a year (due to severe thunderstorms, and I mean SEVERE and when it gets covered with snow during a nasty blizzard). Hell, the Comcast cable tv and cable internet at my apartment go out more often than that!

    2. Re:Directv beats cable by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      yeah, I've had my DirecTivo for about 8 months now, and let me tell you, I'll NEVER go back to cable again.

      I pay $45.00 a month for Directv and Tivo (39.00 for Directv, $4.99 for tivo) I don't have to pay some stupid rental fee for the cable box. I can take the damned thing with me if I want.

      It's a win win situation.

      Oh, and those commercials where the cable company tries to tell you why you shouldn't use Satellite are effing retarded. I love the one where the customer is told they will need to chop down their tree for service. Uh, clueless customer, you need to put the dish in a place where an un-obstructed view of the southern sky is. Then you won't have this problem.

      Weather (as far as I can tell, and it's been a rough winter so far) DOES NOT affect service.

      4 days after I installed the dish, the winds hit about 35 mph, with some nasty sideways rain. Not a pixel of static or interference. I guess it helps to actually bolt the dish on properly.

      In a nutshell, cable sucks big hairy goat testicles, and I'll never get it again. If the weather is so bad to affect your dish, chances are you need to be taking cover anyway.

      HTH

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    3. Re:Directv beats cable by egeorge · · Score: 1

      I second the statment that DirecTV is supeior to cable (especially Comcast).

      I had DirecTV on a shared dish in an apartment complex for about 2 years. The only time we had reception problems was when snow built up on the dish, so I would go to the roof and wipe it off. If you have to put your dish up on a pole, this might be a problem, but most people don't.

      When I moved, I got Comcast because whatever special they were running amounted to free startup and I was too cheap to buy my own dish.

      I miss the dish dearly. The new dish receivers have built in TiVo, which beats hands down the poor integration I experience between my cable box and TiVo. The prices keep going up on Comcast. And the picture quality (especially for the "digital" channels) is dismal compared to the dish.

    4. Re:Directv beats cable by mahdi13 · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. When I first moved into my house cable was not available right away (or the next year) and we looked into and got DirecTV. I have not been disappointed one bit.
      Granted, I don't watch much TV at all...but my wife and daughter do. For the price of cable (sometimes less even) you get 4 times as many channels, customizable 'favorites' lists so you can program to surf only the channels you want.

      We didn't get any TiVo packages (weren't available at the time) and I wish we did, I'd watch more TV I'm sure :)
      The only time reception is bad is if there is a MASSIVE storm. Massive as in trees falling over and raining cats and dogs...this hardly happens so maybe once or twice a year we lose reception for 5-10 minutes. Snow doesn't sit on the dish much and it still works fine with some on it. But being metal on the roof, snow doesn't last long on it if it does stick.
      You do need a clear view of the Southern sky (for us North hemisphere people), I know one guy that can't get it because he's on the edge of a large forest.

      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    5. Re:Directv beats cable by natron+2.0 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with you. I also have the DirecTivo and it beats buying a TiVo seperately. First you have to pay up to $250 for a stand alone TiVo the $14.95 a month for the service. With DirecTV you pay $99 for the TiVo Sat receiver and an extra $4.95 a month. Best deal out there!

    6. Re:Directv beats cable by ad0gg · · Score: 1

      One way to prevent signal loss in bad weather is to put the dish under some sort overhead shelter(not blocking the line of sight to the satellite). The dish seems to have issues when it has water on it, be it snow or rain. If you can keep the dish free of snow or rain, you shouldn't have any problems with reception.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    7. Re:Directv beats cable by Shalda · · Score: 1

      My only real objection to DirecTV is that they charge $5/month for each additional receiver. This is doubly offensive as you have to buy your own units. Other than that, the signal was generally great. I had the usual problems with severe weather and a neighbor who thought it was funny to obstruct my dish.

      The first few months I had satelite, they didn't have local chanels for my area (Richmond, VA). They were added eventually. You should verify that local chanels are available. You can still get them with a conventinal antenna, but it's just more conveniant through your Satelite provider.

    8. Re:Directv beats cable by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I have DTV satellite at home, and I have in fact lost signal in heavy (read: Torrential) rain and snow before. Not often, but several times over the years. Tho as parent said: Weather that bad usually had us scrambling to un plug electronics anyway

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    9. Re:Directv beats cable by grahams · · Score: 1

      Not everyone has an unobstructed view of southern sky, hence the bit about needing to cut down trees.

      My aunt and uncle live in a very wooded part of Upstate NY, and the only reason they have a view of the southern sky (and therefore DirectTV) is because a tornado came through their back yard and cut a swath of trees out a few years ago. This swath of trees just-so-happened to be in a perfect position. If that didn't happen they would have had to cut the trees down themselves.

      Idiot.

    10. Re:Directv beats cable by malfunct · · Score: 1
      The only signal loss I've gotten is when snow piled up on the dish and then got wet. Snow by itself had only minimal effect. You need to drop below like 70% signal strength before you actually start seeing the problems.

      The DirectTV PVR (called DirecTivo by many) is in my opinion the best PVR available. I've tried the dishnetwork PVR and stand alone tivo, I haven't tried replay tv or ultimate tv. Its really nice having the tivo functionality built right into the sattelite reciever and as mentioned before it rocks that you get to record the stream with no transcoding so you get identical quality to the original broadcast.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    11. Re:Directv beats cable by thegoofy · · Score: 1


      I also purchased my DirecTiVo system about 8 months ago and I love it! I had a TiVo before that for over 2 years. I upgraded the drives in the unit (Warranty? I don't need no stinkin warranty) and it works beautifully.

      The other nice thing is for those who pay for the "Premium service" (HBO, Cinemax, etc.) you get the TiVo service for free. I know it's not much, but hey... it all adds up.

      I've never had a problem with reception (not that we get really bad weather here in Las Vegas). I think the key is to make sure you have your dish pointed properly and bolt it down.

      Now if I can only get Sprint to put DSL in my area so I can drop Cox cable...

    12. Re:Directv beats cable by swordboy · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong - I hate Comcast just as much as anyone who has ever dealt with them but... they've got satellite beat when it comes to HDTV. In contrast with their "digital cable" which is mostly just digitally compressed analog (the worst of both worlds), they do pass the local and premium HDTV content, unmodified.

      With satellite, you'll need an antenna to get local HDTV content because there isn't enough bandwidth for a satellite to provide every locale with HDTV. Now, they will provide "national feeds" of some local channels. Dish Network does this with CBS because of all the HDTV content on that channel (CSI is the most watched HDTV program). But it isn't truely a local channel - just an unmodified national feed. So no local news/weather, etc. And you have to pay extra for it because of the gov't regulations that the cable company has, *cough*, purchased.

      However, the new Dish 921 HDTV PVR is cool if you can put up with 25 hours of HDTV PVR and can afford to put an antenna on your house. Most new developments in my area do not allow exterior antennas. Some people can get away with installation in an attic.

      This box will combine terrestrial HDTV for local channels with satellite feeds of everything else. It isn't a bad compromise for those (like me) who don't want anything to do with CableCo monopoly.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    13. Re:Directv beats cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, only 30% of the US Population is serviceable by Satilite.

      While cable TV usually pays the salary and feeds family's of a LOT more local people then Satilite does for the local installers...

      And yes, weather does affect satilite service. I have seen it happen many times, wereas my cable goes out maybe once a year, if that.

      (Usually the result of someone hitting a pole)

    14. Re:Directv beats cable by Pedrito · · Score: 1

      I lived in Northern Virginia (Reston) and had ComCast for both cable and cable modem. I also had DirecTV for about 8 months. Overall, I LOVED ComCast in comparison on one feature alone, and that's the set-top box software. ComCast's cable box had an excellent, easy-to-use guide that was a hundred times better than DirecTVs. I found DirecTV's interface very annoying to use.

      As an example, in the ComCast system, the cable box periodically updates all the programming information and keeps it stored locally. This is an excellent feature. In contrast, if you try to get a program description in DirecTV, it pulls it from the satellite (I assume) and you have to wait for it. Not long, but there was never a wait with the ComCast box.

      Further, I like the fact that with the ComCast box, you can still preview your current channel while browsing what's on others. I hated that every time I brought up the guide in DirecTV, it cut my programming.

      As for disrupted signal, I experienced it a few times in heavy winds with DirecTV(and the antenna was quite secure). But I don't think I had any fewer drops with ComCast (and they weren't frequent with either).

      One disadvantage with the ComCast box is it took longer to come up during a reset (presumably from downloading all the data, possibly other reasons), but this was a very small price to pay for the other features.

    15. Re:Directv beats cable by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Unless you need the ability to watch different channels in different rooms at the same time, an easy solution is to use the composite video out to drive your main TV, and use the RF out for your second (or 3rd) TV. Then get an RF remote or remote extender so you can operate the receiver from another room.

      Incidentally, if you really need seperate tuning capability, you can usually get a 2nd receiver for free, simply by re-uping your 1 yr commitment. Call DTV and ask. If they refuse, ask for Customer Retention and tell them you are thinking about switching to Dish since they are offering multiroom systems for free. You'll be amazed at what you can get for free by threatening to leave.

      Browse the DTV Tivo forum for some examples.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    16. Re:Directv beats cable by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Exactly - I have only lost signal once in the last year due to weather, and I think the wind gusts during the storm were up to 70mph... TV signal was not my first concern.

      Plus, it's not like you don't occasionally lose cable signal during a storm - and when you do, it's not out 5 minutes like satellite, it's out 2 days while they go around putting all the poles back up :)

    17. Re:Directv beats cable by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "I love the one where the customer is told they will need to chop down their tree for service. Uh, clueless customer, you need to put the dish in a place where an un-obstructed view of the southern sky is. Then you won't have this problem."

      In all fairness, this IS an issue. I was in the process of dumping cable for DirecTV, to the point where the installer showed up with the equipment.

      Problem: Mature pine trees on my neighbor's property which blocked the southersn exposure from EVERYWHERE on my roof, and 99% of my property. The solution would have been to run the cable out to the corner of my property (underground), set a fencepost in the ground, and THEN the installer would come back.

      The guy was actually being helpful; he showed me how he could get a signal from the farthest corner of my roof, but next year, I'd get nothing - the tree would have grown. I doubt a lot of other installers would have passed up on the $$ for a problem a year away.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    18. Re:Directv beats cable by phamlen · · Score: 1

      We didn't get any TiVo packages (weren't available at the time) and I wish we did, I'd watch more TV I'm sure :)

      You know, I think it's really interesting the effect that Tivo has had on my TV watching. You would think, with all the advantages that Tivo brings, that one would watch more TV. After all, you can watch shows at anytime you want, you can skip commercials, you can pause Live TV...but I've found that I actually watch less TV for one important reason: Tivo makes my bad habit of watching TV compete directly with my bad habit of procrastination.

      It's a sad thing. I always have these great shows that I want to watch - but then I think I could always watch them tomorrow...

    19. Re:Directv beats cable by ckd · · Score: 1
      I lived in Northern Virginia (Reston) and had ComCast for both cable and cable modem. I also had DirecTV for about 8 months. Overall, I LOVED ComCast in comparison on one feature alone, and that's the set-top box software. ComCast's cable box had an excellent, easy-to-use guide that was a hundred times better than DirecTVs. I found DirecTV's interface very annoying to use.

      Note that with DirecTV you have a choice of receivers. The DirecTiVo units don't have the delays you described, and have either a DTV or TiVo style guide display.

    20. Re:Directv beats cable by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I'm curious. Why (IYO) does cable suck big hairy goat testicles? I have no complaints with my TW cable. Well, one complaint; my SA Tivo can only record one show at a time. AFAIK, that's the only advantage to DirecTivo.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    21. Re:Directv beats cable by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      I've never had a problem with reception (not that we get really bad weather here in Las Vegas). I think the key is to make sure you have your dish pointed properly and bolt it down.

      Now if I can only get Sprint to put DSL in my area so I can drop Cox cable...

      You don't want to get DSL in Las Vegas. We have it at work (along with cable-modem service...don't ask why we have both) and it's flaky as hell. Cable is the way to go around here. The horror stories I've heard about cable-modem service elsewhere don't apply here. For about $60 per month, I have 1.5 Mbps down, 128 kbps up, a static IP address, and no artificial limitations on what services I can provide through my connection (just the usual prohibitions WRT warez servers and such that you'll get anywhere). This site, this site, and this site are hosted through it, along with my mail.

      (My cable-modem service is handled by Cox Business Services, not by the same office that handles cable TV. That might make a difference. I have one of the old gray COM21 modems from back when that was the only type they used. Everything still shows up on one bill; the only difference I can see is that the tech-support number is different. If you're running into restrictions with residential service, you might look into getting business service...at least around here, it doesn't cost anything extra.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    22. Re:Directv beats cable by dwillden · · Score: 1
      I totally agree with you. My dish only pixelates when snow starts building up on the dish. I can either go out and brush it off, or if the snow builds up while I'm not watching tv, once the layer of snow is solid, the signal is back.

      Then there is my Grandmothers experience. She had cable but it was often subject to interference, and the last straw was when she got a cable guy out to try to fix the problem, he told her the problem was interference from a 100+ year old tree across the street. He claimed that the tree was blocking the signal from the mountain top where the regular TV repeater antannae are located.

      Even 80 year old Gandma was smart enough to see through that line of BS. Especially since she still had her TV antanna on the roof and was able to switch to it on the spot and show him that at that particular moment she could get some of the broadcast channels to come in clearer than the cable was at the moment, and that in spite of this supposedly signal blocking tree. Of course the brodcast signal in that location is very suceptible to interference from adverse weather, solar storms, forest fire(6 years ago a fire took out the power line to the repeaters for nearly two weeks), etc...

      She now has dish and loves it.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    23. Re:Directv beats cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, i love my TW cable service... but then again that's only because they forgot to turn it off after the previous tennants moved out and i get it for free. i wouldn't pay for it otherwise; the reception on some channels is awful.

    24. Re:Directv beats cable by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      However, the new Dish 921 HDTV PVR is cool if you can put up with 25 hours of HDTV PVR and can afford to put an antenna on your house. Most new developments in my area do not allow exterior antennas.

      This FCC rule overrides whatever might be in your CC&Rs WRT antennas and dishes. If your HOA gives you grief because you put up a small antenna to pull in HDTV, you can tell them to go fsck themselves, and there will be nothing they can do about it.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    25. Re:Directv beats cable by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      Re-Cable sucky:

      I had ATT (aka Comcast) for about 3 years. During that time the basic channel subscription went up $15.00.

      Yeah, I started getting less channels for more money.

      Plus, the service went out quite a few times during that time span. Once, it was out for 3 days, and the cause was a cable tech. (I lived in an apartment complex at the time) I drove through the entrance gate, noticed the truck, and saw my cable was out. Called to the center, 3 days later the tech shows back up and reconnects the cable at the box outside. Nice.

      Of course, there are people who swear by cable. However, I don't. I had an outage a month for at least a day every month I had their cable modem service as well. I was paying around $90.00 a month for basic cable and cable modem. That's $90.00 too much for sub-par service.

      I'd say be glad your service is good.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    26. Re:Directv beats cable by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      This FCC rule?

      Q: Are all restrictions prohibited?
      A: No, many restrictions are permitted. Clearly-defined, legitimate safety restrictions are permitted even if they impair installation, maintenance or use provided they are necessary to protect public safety and are no more burdensome than necessary to ensure safety... Restrictions necessary for historic preservation may also be permitted

      I, too, have way too much time on my hands...

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    27. Re:Directv beats cable by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I wonder if it's a Comcast thing. I almost never have outages with Time Warner, but I've read lots of gripes about Comcast. I DID have RoadRunner problems and I now have DSL, but my TV service has been rock-solid. The price is about the same as DTV, so that's not an issue.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    28. Re:Directv beats cable by sfjoe · · Score: 1



      Your local government dorks gave the cable company a monopoly and now they don't HAVE to give a shit what you think about them.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    29. Re:Directv beats cable by spanklin · · Score: 1
      but I have had problems with loss of signal during severe thunderstorms and when snow covers the dish.

      This is what I don't understand -- isn't this a problem? I had DirecTV briefly in VA, and rain fade drove me nuts.

      When you pay extra for content (like ESPN's college football plan) and then you miss half the game as the signal fades in and out, what do you do? I called to complain and they said too bad -- rain fade happens. Well, it happened during the middle of a game I paid $99 to see!

      When I moved to PA, I got cable and have not had 1 second of signal loss.

      Like every issue that crops up on /. this one is another that has pros and cons and it depends on what pros you value and cons you can't ignore. Rain fade irritated me to no end, and I will never sign up for satellite again.

    30. Re:Directv beats cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why (IYO) does cable suck big hairy goat testicles?

      There's just no accounting for taste, is all. Some people want to please goats, and sucking their testicles is a means to that end. What I think is so mysterious, is that some people never even get the idea, to shave their goat first. Have you ever picked goat hair out of your teeth?

    31. Re:Directv beats cable by prockcore · · Score: 1

      I pay $45.00 a month for Directv and Tivo (39.00 for Directv, $4.99 for tivo) I don't have to pay some stupid rental fee for the cable box. I can take the damned thing with me if I want.

      I pay $50 a month for Cox Extended Basic and Broadband. No cable box, no rental fees. I don't need another 100 channels of crap... so digital cable/satellite doesn't offer anything for me.

      I'll never switch to Satellite until they come up with a broadband solution as good as cable.

    32. Re:Directv beats cable by Knetzar · · Score: 1

      Last year I had Time Warner go out for about 10-15 min during the super bowl...for most people that would be reason enough to switch

    33. Re:Directv beats cable by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      Actually, only 30% of the US Population is serviceable by Satilite.
      Are you saying that something like 60% of the US lives underground? In heavily wooded forrests?

    34. Re:Directv beats cable by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      I pay $50 a month for Cox Extended Basic and Broadband. No cable box, no rental fees. I don't need another 100 channels of crap... so digital cable/satellite doesn't offer anything for me.

      So you pay $50/mo for EACH, right? That would be $100/mo.

      I'll never switch to Satellite until they come up with a broadband solution as good as cable

      You do realize that you can have satellite and still use cable for broadband, right? I have no idea why you would treat it like either everything goes through cable or nothing does. You just get the cheapest/best service from each.

    35. Re:Directv beats cable by digidemon · · Score: 1

      I have an SA Tivo (actually, it is called an Explorer 8000) and it records 2 things simultaneously and will playback something recorded at the same time as the 2 records are running...

    36. Re:Directv beats cable by prockcore · · Score: 1

      So you pay $50/mo for EACH, right? That would be $100/mo.

      No, I pay $50/mo total. My cox bill last month was $56.27. (So it's actually closer to $60)

    37. Re:Directv beats cable by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      Well damn. I wish I lived where you do. In the 3 states I've lived, in 4 different cities, I've never seen anything that low for cable and internet.

      Can you give a link that shows this price breakdown for your area?

    38. Re:Directv beats cable by Shalda · · Score: 1

      Too late. I baled on DTV for cable to save money on broadband. Stupid Comcast :(

  5. how about: Kill Your TV. by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Come on slashbots, and set yourself free - Kill your TV!

    I've been tv free for 4 years now - and would never consider going back.

    there is much more to life than watching a piece of furniture.

    --
    ... hi bingo ...
    1. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Matey-O · · Score: 3, Insightful
      there is much more to life than watching a piece of furniture.
      What, like that CRT you're stareing at right now? (Don't TELL me Slashdot is more intellectually stimulating than Must See T.V.)
      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    2. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lose the internet connection and we'll ALL be happy

    3. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Subotai · · Score: 1
      "there is much more to life than watching a piece of furniture".

      Cruising the internet, for instance.

      --
      "The only way to catch tiger cubs is to go into the tiger's den."
    4. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by jon787 · · Score: 1

      Nah, like any true geek he has an LCD :)

      --
      X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
    5. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "there is much more to life than watching a piece of furniture."

      Why isn't life interesting enough for you to distract you from stupid posts like this?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Kenja · · Score: 1

      No, a TRUE geek has low sperm count from sitting in front of their radiation belching 24 inch Sony CRT. Freakin LCDs, whats the point of a display that has a fixed resolution?

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    7. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by TenaciousPimple · · Score: 3, Funny
    8. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      No, a TRUE geek wouldn't be able to lift a 24" CRT ;).

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    9. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by malraid · · Score: 1

      I'd second that. I've been without a tv for about 2 years now, and even though I sometimes like to watch 15 of some show (normally stupid things like Jackass, or some just as stupid like the news) , yet I don't I think I ever watch more that 60 minutes a month of TV. I talk on the phone, read, listen to music, write. I just moved, and don't even have a computer right now. I'm typing this at work during my free lunch. I'm going to the gym, socializing, partying. I go to the movies at least once a month, normally with a girl or with friends. If you enjoy TV, watch it, but don't let it eat up your life (like most people) and hey, if you're posting a Slashdot article about it.... There's a whole world outside, go out and live it.

      --
      please excuse my apathy
    10. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by cmacb · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that link. I turned mine off about 4 years ago too. The only problem has been that it seems like people around you get dumber and dumber. It's really pathetic to liten to a physisist bable on for an hour or so about his collection of Buffy the Vampire Slayer episodes (or something like that) and then see the look on his face when you finally get a word in edgwise and ask "What the heck are you talking about?"

      And in answer to other posts: Yes, I find staring at my computer screen more interesting (even Slashdot) becuase I can intereact with it, search it, add to it. Also you don't have to view content on the Internet based on someone elses schedule. It's all there, all the time.

    11. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by stephenisu · · Score: 1

      That's why I payed someone to move it for me ;)

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    12. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      (Don't TELL me Slashdot is more intellectually stimulating than Must See T.V.)

      Why not? Heck, being forced to listen to the Barney song 24/7 while immersed in a sensory deprivation tank for three months with a severed spinal cord is more intellectually stimulating than so-called "Must See TV."

      I mean you could've picked the Discovery channel, the History channel, Food Network, the Sundance channel, or any of a dozen other sources of good quality television, and I might've conceded the point, but network television? Come on, playing Tic-Tac-Toe against a toddler is more intellectually stimulating than network television. It's like having a shiny, flashy, happy video lobotomy.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    13. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was with you until you mentionned discovery channel as quality tv. Uh, have you watched the thing lately? Repeats of boring shows, wedding and baby crap shows, and those irritating hosts. Count me out.
      It used to be good with Soledad O'Brien and those good shows like 'The Secret Life of Machines'.

    14. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a geek with 3 kids under the age of 3 and currently fretting over a test results due in later today about number 4, I can honestly say the low sperm count/large display thing means absolutely nothing.

    15. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by elcid73 · · Score: 1

      .. I play games with my two and half year old toddler.. and I know you were kidding, but it is very intellectually stimulating for me to observe how he views the games and to watch him learn and evolve. Very fascinating indeed.

    16. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Don't TELL me Slashdot is more intellectually stimulating than Must See T.V."

      I can't recall the last time my TV allowed me to read, think, and interact with it.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    17. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      You know the "I, for one, welcome..." catch phrase you see here?

      I invented that.

      I also accidentally revealed a really hot looking chick's breast over the weekend.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    18. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gave up my TV (and related peripherals) a while ago and do find a lot more time to read, exercise etc.

      However, if I were to buy another TV and subscribe to cable/satellite etc., I would not do it without a Tivo (or another DVR). I can make better use of my viewing time and be selective about the when's and what's I watch.

    19. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So instead of TV you spend your time on the internet? Makes sense. TV was such a waste of time.

    20. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by nodata2 · · Score: 1

      in soviet russia, the tv kills you

    21. Re: How about: Kill Your TV. by Zerbey · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid I used to spend my summers at my Aunt and Uncle's who had the infamous "Place where we don't want the TV to be" in the corner of their living room. I'd spent my time there reading books, socialising and generally doing all the things people used to do before TV came along.

      So, turn off your TV once in a while (preferably, turn it off and put it somewhere where you can't get at it) and take a vacation from it. You'll be surprised how little you miss it.

    22. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you seriously saying TV watchers are dumb? I sit in front of my glowing master for nearly 6 hours a day and yet I still know that physicist is not spelled physisist and that babble has two b's in the middle of it.

      Please note that I'm being kind by not pointing out more.

    23. Re: How about: Kill Your TV. by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      exactly - my wife and i are in the process of setting up our new house, and our living room is going to be a truly traditiojnal formal living room. no tv, furniture arranged for conversation.

      people come over to our house, and are a little surprised that we dont have a tv in the LR. then they get over it, and we play card games, chat, and have some real fun interacting with each other.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    24. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by prwood · · Score: 1

      I checked out the link to "Kill your TV" in your post. I was interested in Steve Jobs' quote: "You watch television to turn your brain off and you work on your computer when you want to turn your brain on."

      If anyone is interested, the article from which that quote came is available online here.

      I would like to remind everyone that any group is welcome to take any quote and use it for their own purposes. I personally don't see his quote, taken in context, as being a dig at Television Watching. But I would like to reflect on Steve's quote as follows.

      I think Steve's statement is true for the most part. Most programming on TV is what we'd call mindless entertainment. You watch it, it makes you laugh, or "ooh and aah", or shout "ouch, bet that hurt!". You don't do a whole lot of thinking about it.

      I also agree with the statement from Laura Bush: "Children cannot learn to read by watching television. Television is just background noise and a distraction." Absolutely true. Children are not going to learn to read by watching television. And television is certainly a distraction when children are studying at home.

      But I say: What is the problem with this? What is wrong with turning your brain off? I have my brain "turned on" for a minimum of eight hours a day at work, often more when I'm working on creative projects at home. I like to turn my brain off at times, and TV is just one of many ways to do that. If you want to keep your brain "turned on" 24/7, feel free... it's not for me, though.

      In the same way, I don't see anything wrong with letting kids watch a little TV now and then. Obviously it needs to be carefully monitored; because of television's power to 'suck you in,' so to speak, what starts out as an innocent "I'm just going to watch one program" can turn into a three hour marathon of television watching. But give kids a chance to shut their brains off now and then. Whether it's riding a bike outside or watching TV inside... I think there's some value to it.

      And I do agree with TenaciousPimple that you just might be this guy.

    25. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's like having a shiny, flashy, happy video lobotomy.
      You're right, it's beautiful
    26. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      He might have a braille output device, or a text-to-speech reader.

    27. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So?

      I can't recall the last time my Slashdot allowed me to read, think, and interact with it.

      [Note the "and"]

    28. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      TV free for 3 years.

      Kind of funny they way we sound like former druggies when we say that.

      We just had a little one, and the camel's nose is poking back in the tent. My wife got a set of rabbit ears to get public television. I just see that as a gateway to afternoon cartoons, which ultimately leads to complaints about why the picture is fuzzy and we need to upgrade to cable or satellite.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    29. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Come on slashbots, and set yourself free - Kill your TV!

      Who let this guy in here?

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    30. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't recall the last time my TV allowed me to read, think, and interact with it.

      Then stop watching your bullshit reality TV programming and turn on a real channel like Discovery Science or the History channels.

    31. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      Ah, so you're the /.er who reads the article and thinks when you post. By all appearances, most can't even manage one of those accomplishments particularly well, never mind both of them.

    32. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, Sesame Street?

    33. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DVDs, games systems (XBOX, PS2,etc..), digital cable let you do all those with your tv.

    34. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by worldtechguy · · Score: 1

      Be careful. If you watch about 2 hours of TechTv, you'll be on the phone to Dish or DirecTV in a flash. Especially Sarah Lane or Jessica Corbin on the ScreenSavers.

    35. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      I stopped watching close to 10 years ago... wanna have another contest?

      However, now that HDTV is finally rolling out in my area for OTA broadcats (I might get 5 channels), I took the plunge and ordered a MyHD-120 PCI card. With the recording capability, I won't be locked to the chair during the time-slot, and I won't have to fiddle with VCR tapes.

      I'll still probably spend more time online then watching TV (I estimate I'll watch maybe 10-12 hours per week). So long as I'm in control of when I get to watch what I want to watch, I'll be content.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    36. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I can quit anytime I want...I just don't want to right now...

    37. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by C.+Alan · · Score: 1

      Eggad, not one of those phony people who have to remind you at least once an hour that they don't own a TV.

      Go annoy someone else.

    38. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      how about this - try to have a conversation without bringing up the fantasy land that is television.

      go one entire day without talking about television to your coworkers/classmates/whoever.

      i'll bet that you cant.

      most of the time, with most people, the conversation will eventually turn to television. all that i say is "i dont watch television". i dont proletyze in my conversations, but i dont want to hear about people talking about their imaginary friends.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    39. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >> "Don't TELL me Slashdot is more intellectually stimulating than Must See T.V."

      >I can't recall the last time my TV allowed me to read, think, and interact with it.

      Oh hell, that's just *way* too easy a target...

    40. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "there is much more to life than watching a piece of furniture"

      Gimme a break. Check out this link.
      http://www.theonion.com/onion3604/doesnt_ow n_telev ision.html

    41. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I was with you until you mentionned discovery channel as quality tv. Uh, have you watched the thing lately?

      Not really. I look at my budget of money and -- even more importantly -- my free time and decided that television wasn't worth the resources two years ago. My TV exists for video games and as the monitor to my PC.

      ...So, no, I didn't know that the Discovery channel had gone downhill.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    42. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by telstar · · Score: 1
      "I can't recall the last time my TV allowed me to read, think, and interact with it."
      • I'd be willing to bet there was a whole legion of teenage boys
      • interracting with their TVs when Janet Jackson flashed her boob last night.
    43. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "most of the time, with most people, the conversation will eventually turn to television."

      Your problem isn't television, retard. It's the company you keep.

    44. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Teancom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Spoken like someone that doesn't watch network television. Yes, most of it's crap, just like most of, well, anything. But then you get shows like "Scrubs", "Arrested Development", "Malcolm in the Middle", "Angel", and "Coupling" (BBC version), all of which I can watch using just an antenna. I wouldn't call any of those shakespeare, but that's not the point. They *are* good t.v. shows. But you didn't want to actually judge something by its qualities. A quick bash is easier...

    45. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great site. I got rid of my TV ten years ago, and I haven't missed it yet.

    46. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American Idol.

      Oh, wait. You said "think".

    47. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey is this you?

      Same old link that was funny the first time, not the 500th time posts the same fucking post.

    48. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Agreed - up to a point. I went without a TV feed for 2 years and got along pretty well with VCR tapes, the computers, and books; but I missed pro wrestling, cartoons, and the Sci Fi channel. These days I don't watch cartoons that much, but the other 2 are pretty much the only reason I have Dish Network installed. That, and Most Extreme Elimination Challenge. :)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    49. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you've never watched Wheel of Fortune and yelled the answer at the TV.

    50. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "read"

      Most /. "readers" don't even read the article. Many don't even read the summary before they post. Many don't read comments before replying to them.

      "think"

      If goatse.cx jokes are considered thinking, then we are all screwed.

      "interact"

      Point taken.

    51. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by prockcore · · Score: 1

      I can't recall the last time my TV allowed me to read, think, and interact with it.

      Turn on CNN Headline news.

      You read the ticker.
      You think about why someone would use Yahoo's homepage as design inspiration for a TV channel.
      You yell at the pundits.

    52. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by stalky14 · · Score: 1


      I was wondering how long it would take in a Slashdot TV thread for someone to climb up and beat his chest and proclaim his lack of TV watching, and subsequent intellectual superiority, as if anyone cares.



      If you want to throw out the baby with the bathwater, fine, but there is some good stuff out there if you dig for it. Dish Network has some really cool educational channels up in the 9000 range with college lectures and arts programming and such. They also have the NASA channel on their primary satellite, so you don't need a special dish to get it like DirecTV. DirecTV also has some edu channels but I don't think as many. FCC rule says a certain percentage of space on each satellite has to be devoted to educational channels. I'm not sure if Cable has a similar requirement.

      ...Sean.

    53. Re:how about: Kill Your TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burn. you will burn, how dare you miss out on anime and amazingly good things? cleanse your soul, and watch TV!

  6. how about... by xtermz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...neither? Sell the TV, and where your entertainment center would be, put a bookcase. I cut back to basic cable and though i "miss" some shows, I dont miss wasting countless hours on the couch .....i cant even tell you what "reality shows" are on these days....

    --


    I lost my concept of community when my community lost all concept of me.
    1. Re:how about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Did you notice I called it television and not TV. TV is a nickname. Nicknames are for friends, and television is no friend of mine." - Mr. Show

    2. Re:how about... by koreth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wasting countless hours on the couch is as much TV's fault as an open mail relay is the Sendmail team's fault. A tool is just a tool; whether or not it's used appropriately is up to its owner. It's possible to have both a TV and a bookcase and get plenty of enjoyment out of both.

    3. Re:how about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      well, i hear they just started casting for american high horse, if you're looking for some extra cash

    4. Re:how about... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Basic Cable is not to bad. It gets the channels you really need. The Locals channels and news, and a couple of stations like TV Land, It is better quality then over Antenna and you do get 5 or six more useful channels. I do Miss having CNN and Cartoon Network. But it has made me far more productive at home. If I were watching more shows I would probably switch to satellite because it is like having Digital Cable at near standard cost. My parents have it in Maine and the quality is really good and it works well after it is properly setup. I think the reliability is just as good as Cable because your cable TV will go down and out after a thunderstorm or on very windy conditions, or due to construction. So the downtime for cable is down for a couple hours once every 2 or 3 months compared to satellite which has some static (or low res imaging it it is digital) for a second or two in bad weather every 2 or 3 weeks.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:how about... by Boing · · Score: 2, Funny
      Unfortunately, it's no longer accessible from the main site, but you remind me of the Onion article "Area Man Constantly Mentioning He Doesn't Own A Television" (link).

      Just thought that might be an interesting reference for those who are annoyed by you and other people like you who belittle the chosen entertainment forms of others.

    6. Re:how about... by zulux · · Score: 1



      There is a middle ground...

      Keep the TV - but only hook it up to a DVD player.

      Then get a subscription to Netflix - all the PBS/Documentry content you could possibly want wihtou the comericals/pledge-drives.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    7. Re:how about... by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      I cut back to basic cable and though i "miss" some shows, I dont miss wasting countless hours on the couch ....

      Or how about being able to enjoy something in moderation?

      We're not all going to "kill our TV's" just because some people watch them too much, just as we're not all going to give up beer because some people are alcoholics.

      It's not alcohol's fault that you drink it and it's not the TV's that you watch it. Just do things in sensible amounts, why is that concept so hard for people?

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    8. Re:how about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could deal with television if it wasn't for all the "ask your doctor if mindnumbitro is right for you". But I guess that is where TiVO and all the others come in. Skip the people trying to sell you happiness.

    9. Re:how about... by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      >It gets the channels you really need.

      there are absolutely *zero* channels that you *need*.

      none, zero, zippo, zilch.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    10. Re:how about... by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      you still think that you're the one "choosing" television?

      have fun with that, and your imaginary "Friends (tm)".

      I mean - you do realize that those images on the television, arent real, right?

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    11. Re:how about... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, it's no longer accessible from the main site

      It sure is.

    12. Re:how about... by Malor · · Score: 1

      The weird thing about this argument is that it can't be contradicted; if you insist that all people who don't watch television are very loud about that fact, then anyone who disputes this is sort of proving the point.

      I think it's going to become a very strong meme. It makes sense on the surface, and ALL arguments, both pro and con, can be construed as data supporting it. I bet practically everyone will believe it within a year or two.

      That does not, however, make it true.

    13. Re:how about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats why im glad people have tv's, because then they just become arrogant.

    14. Re:how about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      holy david koresh with a lisp!

      a tool is just a tool, indeed.

    15. Re:how about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "there are absolutely *zero* channels that you *need*."

      There are also zero desserts that you *need.* You don't *need* a car, or a stereo, or books or even a toilet. You *need* food, water, and sometimes shelter. Everything else is a luxury.

      Some of us enjoy the luxury of television. Some of us enjoy watching sports events like the SuperBowl or the Olympics. I'll never be able to afford to see those things in person, but the television gives me a cheap eye into the action. I enjoy that.

      I also like being able to watch election results. I was ecstatic to have a television durring the 2000 election. I found the back-and-forth drama fascinating, being a ConLaw scholar. I wouldn't have traded my television for anything -- and certainly not for your "holier than thou" bullshit.

      There may be better men than I who have given up watching TV. I suspect, however, they're off doing more important things than conversing on Slashdot. I know for damn sure that you're not one of them. You're just an idiot with a security complex. Watch telelvision, or don't watch television...you're still an idiot.

    16. Re:how about... by jeffgeno · · Score: 1
      ...neither? Sell the TV, and where your entertainment center would be, put a bookcase. I cut back to basic cable and though i "miss" some shows, I dont miss wasting countless hours on the couch .....i cant even tell you what "reality shows" are on these days....

      Neither can I, and my monthly cable/Internet bill is almost $100. But I'm a grown up who knows how to exercise self control, enjoy things in moderation, and not watch any piece of crap I come across.

    17. Re:how about... by fragbait · · Score: 1
      "A tool is just a tool; whether or not it's used appropriately is up to its owner."

      Amen, brother! I keep telling this to my girlfriend but she....oh, wait...you are talking about a television set. Nevermind.

  7. DirectTivo by solefald · · Score: 2, Informative

    Get yourself DirecTV with Tivo built-in. I bought one nearly 2 years ago, added another hard drive and
    truly enjoing it. Plus DirecTV is better then cable..... Thats my 2c...

  8. It's a marketing hype (Cable) by ScooterBill · · Score: 5, Informative

    As long as your dish is secure and the transmission is working, you will have virtually no problems from weather. This is BS from the Cable companies.

    I've never had a problem due to inclement weather although we don't get fierce lightning storms where I live so I don't know if that makes a difference.

    I would choose the service based on the programming.

    M

    1. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by Wall,_The · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree that the signal "problems" are marketing bull from cable companies. I've lived in places where there was snowing for 5 months out of the year. And raining the rest. Never had any problems. The dish doesn't even collect snow like old C-Band dishes did. Check who offers what channels and at what price. For me, the Sat wins every time!

    2. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      my folks have satelite t.v. through, who knows, DirectTV I think? They *definately* have problems with cloudy weather and rain. The fun of it all is trying to hear the severe weather warnings during something like a tornado watch/warning and you can't, no signal. Hmm, 3 tornados have touched down 7 miles away and we don't know where they are heading? Time to go to the basement...

      you don't need fierce lightening storms, just cloud cover and a decent amount of rain it seems. tornado type weather will definately hose your transmission.

    3. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      ... must be installed incorrectly or with a poor dish, like my parents' one. Other posters indicate that inclement weather should not be a problem.

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    4. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > I've lived in places where there was snowing for 5 months out of the year. And raining the rest. Never had any problems.

      I'd count that as a problem all by itself.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    5. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by frission · · Score: 1

      i have to agree...all hype. i currently have cable, but my parent's house has satellite. i live in NC, and haven't had any video loss at the parent's house even during hurricane season.
      the advantage that i like about cable, is that i do get a discount when they bundle it with high speed internet...and another advantage, is splitting cable.
      if you have 2 tvs that you want to hook up with satellite (like my parent's house), you need 2 receivers (or 1 receiver for every tv), and then the dishnetwork charges you an extra $5/mo for the extra receiver signal (BS to me...i'm already getting the signal!)
      anyway...that's why i chose cable over satellite, but i haven't had any problems with satellite, and i think with satellite you get more channels.
      oh, another thing...you have to pay for network channels with satellite, if you want your local channels, which is mostly what i watch anyway.

    6. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Cancel your DirecTV then signup again and get them to send an installer. This is not something you want to do yourself. Its free with year contact, and makes all the difference in the world.

    7. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get rare artifacts or pixelation on my Dish system due to weather here in Detroit MI area. Friends with local cable (Comcast) complain about weather related troubles. Wet cables? Ice storms.

    8. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by djaquay · · Score: 1

      We've had Dish Network for several years, and during intense thunderstorms, we do get brief signal outages. None have lasted for more than 10-15 minutes, and are a minor inconvenience over the satellite experience (interactive menus, etc.), which I greatly prefer over when I last had cable.

      Free Tibet! (Minimum purchase required.)

    9. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      I rarely get rain fade and I'm in an area where it rains fairly often. When it does happen, it's typically some brief (5-10 seconds) pixelation. I do sometimes lose the signal for more than a minute, ~6 times a year, but it's only during really severe thunderstorms when I'm more concerned about my electronics getting "zapped" by lightning than anything else. All in all, it would take the mother of all cable deals to get me to switch back.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    10. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by PeteQC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I live in Quebec and the only problem I ever had receiving transmission was because sone snow was sticking on the dish. But if the snow is not sticky, we receive a good signal even during a snow storm...

      --
      Montreal - Best city to live in!
    11. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by Beatbyte · · Score: 1

      I had the dish for a short 3 months. I live in FL. Weather can, will, and does affect the signal quality.

      It rains every day in the summer here and signal is almost always out. This is usually the only time I want to watch TV anyways.

    12. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by pogle · · Score: 1

      I also have had no problems, during thunderstorms, hail, and a snowstorm. Freezing rain had no effect on the dish either. And we've had pretty much all of those here in Southern Maryland in the past 10 days. I love the Directv service. Just wish I had a Tivo to go with it, so I could see those fun programs that come on obscure channels when I'm sleeping or at work.

      Altho the directv installer said i might have a problem with this scraggly maple thats near the dish's LOS. When it gets leaves, it could interfere with the signal window. But if that's the case, it gets cut down. Thing is waaay too skinny for its height, and as apt to fall in our next hurricane as all those stupid pine trees.

      So I guess the only real signal problems could stem from having nowhere to put the dish due to trees, housing regulations, or terrain.

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    13. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Could it depend on the frequency? Some say they have weather problems and some say they don't. Maybe different providers or different plans use different frequencies which are affected differently by weather.

    14. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      virtually no problems

      I guess you did say virtually no problems not completely no problems. I've had a couple of minutes of signal loss this winter for maybe 99.96% uptime.

      I lost it today for about 1/2 minute when the red stuff on this map (55 dBz echos) passed overhead bringing some light hail along with the sideways rain.

      The only irritation is that my multifunction remote isn't set up to control the sat box quite right. I usually use a standalone TiVo to change channels, but when the signal drops out completely, the box wants you to press channel up or down, not key in a channel number (as TiVo does).

      That and my failure to notice that my son was 20 minutes "behind" real time so grabbing the right remote & pressing keys did nothing made it a bit irritating.

      Not anywhere as bad as the fuzzy analog & half D-1 (352x480) soft digital on the cable co formerly known as TCI. Maybe if they'd followed through on the "high-speed internet" line on the trucks when it was AT&T broadband I'd be less annoyed, but no-one's spent any $$ on infrastructure in the last 10 years so we have no HDTV and no cable modems. Time-Warner is a whole other story...

    15. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by Overt+Coward · · Score: 1
      Absolutely... in heavy rain I may lose my DirecTV signal for 10-15 minutes -- this happens once or twice a year. If cable goes down for any reason, though, it takes hours, if not days, for them to repair it.

      On the whole, the satellite is cheaper and higehr quality than cable. The only downside is the requirements for the unobstructed view to the southern sky -- some of my relatives in New York and Connecticut can't get DirecTV because of too many trees in their way (the angle of the dish gets pretty shallow in the northern latitudes...)

    16. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by greed · · Score: 1

      I live in Toronto, and during a recent snowstorm, the signal I was watching went out (on Star Choice).

      I checked the dish, it was pretty snowy, so I stuck the broom out the window and gently dusted it off.

      Signal was still out. Dumb me then tried another channel. Everything except CBC in Alberta was fine.

      I figured the station's uplink had gone dead, which also would have killed the cable feed for that station. (Except it was in Calgary, so you can't get it on cable here. Gotta love multiple timezones of the same network feed for things you didn't know will be on.)

      The really funny part is, the signal went out while the show was making fun of the miserable weather we've been having--fake static on the picture and things. It was a taped show (Air Farce).

    17. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      I live in a chicago suburb and I have dish network. I get weather related problems from time to time. It takes a lot though. Sometimes, the wind gets so hard that it forces its way through the weather stripping on our windows. They make a loud farting noise when this happens. I'm not making this up. In these cases, the wind blows the dish around and we get reception problems. It's not much of a problem though, the dish retrains within a couple seconds and things continue. For snow to stop the signal, it takes a lot. I think in the last three years, I've only lost the signal twice because of snow, it was back in short order. When we lived in indiana, sprind thunderstorms would sometimes knock out service when we had directv. Those outages were longer. I aimed the dish in that case though. I'm using the large starband dish which is larger than the normal dishes, but has two extra stabilizing arms. It's all attached to a large deck though so YMMV.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    18. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An inch of wet snow on the dish is more than enough to completely kill any signal you get, but brushing it off with a broom will fix it.

    19. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by daemon_lothar · · Score: 1

      I live on the gulf coast of Texas and it does occasionally have extremely heavy rains of 2-4 inches per hour about 5 to 10 times a year. We do get sat backouts but only during the heaviest of downpours in which you can't hear over the rain anyway with a normal TV speaker. The blackouts usually last from 10-60 minutes, it isn't too bad considering cable, if we could get it, would cost us 3 times as much for the same channels.

    20. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) by Apathetic1 · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree. The company that mentions their competitor in their advertising is probably losing.

      We've had a dish for a couple of years now and have only lost signal three or four times, if memory serves. The windstorm that took a huge patch of shingles off our roof and the time it was raining so hard that our driveway flooded are the only two weather related interruptions we've had.

      --

      My username does not make me Apathetic. It's irony, get it?

  9. Tech TV by JavaLord · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have comcast, and they took Tech TV (ZDTV) out of their lineup about a year ago. If you like that channel, you better call and see if they have it. Since then, I've got 3 telemundos, 4 'womens' channels, the golf channel, etc. They don't even have tech tv on digital cable here either. I'm interested in seeing what other people post about this, because I would like to get tech tv again!

    1. Re:Tech TV by nearlygod · · Score: 1

      I couldn't live without my daily fill of Sarah Lane & Morgan Webb!

      --
      The Tools Of Ignorance wanna be a tool?
    2. Re:Tech TV by illuminata · · Score: 1

      Tech TV is still carried by Comcast where I'm at, but they have juggled it in the new package lineups to a special digital package.

      --


      Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    3. Re:Tech TV by CRYPTOFREQ · · Score: 1

      I live in new jersey and we get techtv. In fact its about all I watch. My 2 year old son loves the screensavers!

    4. Re:Tech TV by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      I have Insight digital cable and in order to get TechTV I had to add the $5 per month "Sports Package". WTF?

      It also includes G4, CourtTV, and a few other "Sports" channels...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    5. Re:Tech TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quote: I live in new jersey...

      you have my condolences.

    6. Re:Tech TV by Wakkow · · Score: 1

      Comcast in the bay area (where techtv is located) doesn't carry TechTV either..

    7. Re:Tech TV by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      if you just have one TV, then Direct TV is actualy CHEAPER.

      that is until you load up on more boxes...each box costs 5 bucks a month.....

      oye...I wish we only had one TV in this house.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    8. Re:Tech TV by mstra · · Score: 1
      Hear, hear! I have had nothing but good service and performance from Comcast...

      ...with the exception of their TechTV bias. Bastards! The only cable provider in my area that seems to have it is RCN, and since they're the devil, I can't be bothered to give them money.

      --
      Photography, technology, and my dog Scout - http://mattstratton.com
    9. Re:Tech TV by lrucker · · Score: 1

      Sunnyvale Comcast does have TechTV, but only in the digital cable package.

    10. Re:Tech TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comcast NJ has TechTV as well as TechTV on-demand content.

    11. Re:Tech TV by Choachy · · Score: 1

      I too am frustrated with the channel line up of Comcast in my area. I once called Comcast to inquire about certain channels, one being Tech TV and the other being The Outdoor Channel, not to be confused with the Outdoor Life Network. I too was blown away when I checked the digital channel summary to find Tech TV not listed there either. If it werent for Comcast's great cable internet service, I would be on satellite in a heartbeat. DirecTV now offers local stations, DVR's, and has some great sign up incentives, such as free installation, 3 months of HBO free, and 3 recievers. Also, three friends with satellite never have a problem with poor reception.

    12. Re:Tech TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see them in southern (ocean city) jersey

    13. Re:Tech TV by NotNormal23224 · · Score: 1

      Weird, I have Comcast and still have Tech TV (it's on Channel 244) If I were you I'd check your package, for some strange reason I think they have started bundling it with the sports packages. I have the "everything" option so I still get it, I was going to drop the sports channels but then they told me they'd take my TechTV (what drugs are they on?)!

    14. Re:Tech TV by StarWreck · · Score: 1

      I've tried watching G4 a couple of times when TechTV was showing reruns. As far as I can tell, G4 is a "ghetto" TechTV. What does everyone else think about The G4 channel?

      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    15. Re:Tech TV by volkris · · Score: 1

      If you like that channel you should go beat yourself repeatedly for keeping such trash on the air.

      I kid!

      Well, halfway...
      TechTV is one of the worst channels on the air...

    16. Re:Tech TV by dasmegabyte · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's probably because TechTV is boring, inaccurate garbage. Watching that channel is really worthwhile if you want a marketting take on the amazing, top of the line electronics of three months ago. Oh, and commercials for things you couldn't possibly want. Oh, and animation that's so shitty even cartoon network won't take it.

      G4's the same deal.

      I suppose they might be worthwhile for people who don't actually care about the information enough to read slashdot, zdnet, Wired, and so forth. But you're not one of them, eh?

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    17. Re:Tech TV by The+Bum · · Score: 1

      Definitely ask Comcast about TechTV. It wasn't listed in their marketing materials when I got digital cable, but I knew it was there because it showed up in the online program listings. Like another poster, I had to add a special digital package for $5/month, which gave me a few other channels I wanted also (and which were also absent from the marketing materials).

    18. Re:Tech TV by taniwha · · Score: 2, Informative
      it does in Oakland - at least in the new digital lineup - one of the things they seem to be doing as part of their fiber buildout is to expand their 'basic cable' lineup from 30 channels to include all of the analog channels (and I assume charge more for 'basic' in the process). I think they are probably moving analog channels to digital in the process.

      Remember they can fit many digital channels in the cable spectrum that a single analog one fits - they need to move all the analog channels eventually to digital to provide more channels in the same space

    19. Re:Tech TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At every cable company, you can get any channel without buying a package, as long as they carry the channel. Its a new federal law. Check out http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/2218521/detai l.html

    20. Re:Tech TV by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      Similar to my situation with the Speed Network. I like rally racing, and in Orlando, I got the Speed Network with my basic cable package. Well, now that I've graduated and moved, the Speed Network is only available in this location when you have digital cable! ARGH!

      Moral of the story, make sure the channels you like are available on the package you are planning to get.

      And for the record, the cable is free with my apartment, and to upgrade I (supposedly) just have to pay the difference. I'm just waiting until I get my new HDTV :-)

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    21. Re:Tech TV by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      Where in NJ? I'm in North NJ (probably why I'm getting 4 telemundos) and we get no tech TV. I actually know a girl who works customer service for comcast and told me everyone calls and bitches about it in my area.

    22. Re:Tech TV by CRYPTOFREQ · · Score: 1

      i live on fort dix and its channel 68.

    23. Re:Tech TV by Whatchamacallit · · Score: 1

      Check out http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/2218521/detai l.html

      ***
      They wait till the last paragraph to tell you
      ***
      Quote: "There is a catch. Tier Buy Through doesn't apply to Digital cable, which offers more channels and at higher prices. If you have digital, you still have to buy packages. So take a look at what you are paying, and what you are getting, because you can always downgrade your package to fit your needs."

  10. don't watch tv. read slashdot instead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're a real geek you don't have time to watch tv. all your time should be spent reading slashdot!

  11. I hate losing my sat. by scumdamn · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have dish and I love the fact that they cost so much less than Time Warner cable in the Austin area. I recently moved into an apartment and unfortunately it faces the wrong way apparently and I can't get reception. I wish the dish could point somewhere other than southwest because then I'd be golden. And for about the same service dish costs half what cable does.

    1. Re:I hate losing my sat. by juneadelle · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly. I live in a suburb just north of Austin, where Cox is the cable provider. They run the same BS ads about how your satellite will go out if your neighbour's kid is jumping on his trampoline. We switched to Dish Network just before Christmas last year, and have been very happy. We got the Dish DVR, and we LOVE it. I notice artifacting when watching football games, but at no other times. Reception is great, and the price is definitely right--less than half what we used to pay for Cox, with more channels. And our cable would go out when it rained really hard anyway. >.

    2. Re:I hate losing my sat. by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      When I lived in Austin I was pretty happy with Time Warner. Sure, they are expensive, but the cable and internet service was pretty good.

      A few years ago we moved to Pflugerville, where the service is from Cox Cable. Cox sucks! (No pun intended.)

      We had horrible problems with the internet service. They moved to two-hour IP leases. Each time it renewed we'd get kicked offline, which doesn't work when you play online games. Plus, we had ~50% upstream packet loss, which they had no intentions of helping us fix. I couldn't upload things to shutterfly.com or to my hosting service without ftp timing out. SBC DSL is much better and MUCH faster. (I had both for a week and timed everything.)

      For cable service, Cox sucked too. It cost $65 a month for their digital service (required to get TechTV) with two receivers, and all but 5 of the channels were still analog. We switched to Dish Network Top 100, have all digital now, get all the same channels, pay only $20 a month for the first three months, have two receivers, and oh yeah, got a FREE DVR out of it. And for the first three months we have HBO and Cinemax, from which I'm recording (courtesy of DVR) all the movies from the past year I missed but might someday watch. When the three months are up, I'll cancel HBO/Cinemax, and just pay like $45 a month.

      The only big downside is that VH1 Classis, where they still play videos, isn't available except on the Dish Network 150 plan. Of course, it wasn't available from Cox at all, so I've gotten used to this.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    3. Re:I hate losing my sat. by Archalien · · Score: 1

      Same thing happened to me in Austin.

      I had DirecTV with Tivo for a year, told every apartment place I looked at that I MUST be able to have a clear line of sight because I would never pay TimeWarner again. I was assured my balcony was perfect for it, and then I actually set it all up and I could get only about half of the transponders on the satellite (the way the buildings were angled, it looked clear but it wasn't) and thus no DirecTV.

      After kicking myself a few times, I got a huge discount from TimeWarner for being a former DirecTV customer. I tried their DVR and it was terrible (couldn't use my Tivo built into my sat. receiver), so I went and bought a standalone Tivo (only to realize that they don't have a 2nd tuner which is highly important).

      Bottom Line: Digital Cable costed me more, even with discounts, and Digital Cable had worse reception than DirecTV! I'm not even kidding. My Digital Cable was out more than my DirecTV ever was... at least with a Dish there is an explaination for signal loss (weather, etc), what is Digital Cable's reason for its quite frequent hickups?

    4. Re:I hate losing my sat. by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Consider asking if you can mount the antenna to their roof. Suprisingly some allow you to. Let them know, that if they like, you can leave the dish installed for the next tenent so your apartment will be more easily rented. When you move, DirecTv lets you leave the dish (they'll be selling the new occupants service is the presumption) and provide a new install at your new address. Dish may do the same. Consider seeing if your complex will drop cable in favor of Dish or DirecTv. Both do deals with aprtment complexes. It provides "product differentiation" for your complex, and additional revenue for them.

      --
      - Tjp

      I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

    5. Re:I hate losing my sat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My apartment complex here in Austin used to use SWBell as a cable provider, which meant we got DirecTV. It was okay for a while, but in any rainstorm we'd lose signal. So not only couldn't we go out because of rain, we didn't have anything to watch on TV because of it.

      Once we went to Time Warner, things were peachy. No downtime, ever...

      Since I use a standalone Tivo, I didn't need the Time Warner tivo, but I did try it out in a 2nd room. It *sucks* compared to regular Tivos, as the damned thing loses your settings every other week or so and your recordings. Which renders it pretty useless.

      Now that I live in a house I stayed with Time Warner and love it. You can hook up all your TVs to the cable jacks and get at least basic cable, without need for extra boxes (like DirecTV) and you can still use the standalone Tivo.

    6. Re:I hate losing my sat. by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      Signal: sounds like they didn't install the dish right.
      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    7. Re:I hate losing my sat. by kcurtis · · Score: 1

      I think I read somewhere that many jurisdictions now consider satellite dishes a standard antenna, and thus buildings in those jurisdictions have to let you mount it where it has a line of sight to the satellite.

      But I live in the Peoples Republic of Massachusetts, so who knows.

  12. DVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some cable systems are offering DVR as well ("soon") but have been extremely quiet regarding what the features will be and how much they will cost - no differently than "Showtime on Demand" - will it cost as much as the ~$10/month Showtime costs, etc.

  13. I like satellite by Wakkow · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a student living in an area with Comcast.. For the first two years we had Comcast because we're all used to having cable. It was okay, nothing special.. Eventually, I got fed up with Comcast not carrying some channels I wanted (Food Network and TechTV) and they kept inching the price up. I found DirecTV had a deal for three free months and a monthly fee less than that of cable.

    Installation was a slight pain because we live in an apartment and couldn't mount the dish onto the building.. I bought a $25 tripod and a $3 piece of pipe (as the installer suggested, since it's cheaper than buying it from them). The reception is clear but you do notice some artifacts once in a while (similar to what a DivX looks like) in the picture due to the compression. The local channels are actually clearer than they were with cable and we get a lot more good channels. We've only lost the signal twice from two bad storms when our tripod literally tipped over. None of this "vanishing signal" like the cable commercials imply. Heck, we lost the cable signal at least once or twice a year during a bad storm. It doesn't degregate during storms, but we don't get snow, which I hear really kills the signal.

    Overall, I'm glad we switched.. If you're happy with basic extended cable channels, I'd stick with comcast. If you want some of the extra channels, go satellite. I'm not sure which has NASAtv or if it's an add-on channel or something.. I see now that you can get a Tivo for cheap if you sign up for satellite and I think the Tivo monthly service fee is less also.

    1. Re:I like satellite by Schnapple · · Score: 2, Informative
      The reception is clear but you do notice some artifacts once in a while (similar to what a DivX looks like) in the picture due to the compression
      Digital Cable also has this problem, in my experience with it.
    2. Re:I like satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASA TV is on DirecTV channel 376. You need a DIRECTV Multi-Satellite System in order to watch NASA TV. Says so at the bottom of the page...

      http://www.directv.com/DTVAPP/learn/Packages_Tot al Choice_Plus.dsp

    3. Re:I like satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that there is a requirement (at least where I live) that the apartment building *has* to allow you to install the dish -- they can specify where is the only catch.

      NASA TV is on Direct TV and is included with any of their packages. I *think* that it's even free even if you don't subscribe to one of their packages.

    4. Re:I like satellite by Wakkow · · Score: 1

      From what I found, they are allowed to tell me that I can't mount it on the building.. They just can't disallow use of the tripod and dish on the balcony.

      Also, if you own a house that's part of a homeowner's association, they have to allow you to mount it on your house. They can't say it's an eyesore and make you take it down.

    5. Re:I like satellite by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Yes. it's inherrent to all digital signals encoded in mpeg2 - you can virtually eliminate them when encoding for DVD because you can plump it up in the 6 ot 7Mbit range.

      In order to squeeze more channels and content over the limited spectrum the Sat/cable companies have available to them, they compromise on the quality and blocking artefacts apppear in the signal.

      Sky (in the UK) varies the quality of individual channels - it's noticeably better on some channels than others, although the general quality is very good. Most people wouldn't be able to tell the difference between the Sky movie channels and an average DVD.

      There are some things that mpeg2 has trouble with that show up the artefacts more - things like large patches of similar colour and complex texture, like grass.

  14. Go with Satellite by Chaos1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've only had one outage in the year and half that I have had Dish Network, and that was only during a bad snow storm. I've heard other complaints about losing signal during rain, or cloudy days, but have not experienced them myself.

    My parents have Comcast and it glitches out all the time, with the screen pulsating with lines across the screen. They've also had random outages for no apparent reason. Comcast just replaces the reciever hoping to fix the problem, but it never does. I've also been told by Comcast installers that most of the equipment they're using is refurb and they have troubles all the time.

    --
    I only need the Preview button when I haven't used the Preview button.
    1. Re:Go with Satellite by wizkid · · Score: 1


      Bad snowstorms will hammer my dish network connection. We have comcast in our area, and until last fall, all the local stations were crap. They just replaced the main feed in our area, and my neighbors comcast feed has been clear ever since. The satellite pic is still a little better. I just got a HD tv, and Satellite won't be offering the local stations in HD unfortunately. I can't pick up the over-the-air HD transmissions, so if I decide I want the local stations in HD, I'll probably be stuck going back to cable. Right now, cable has more channels in HS availible, but Dish supposidly has a "SuperDish" going on line soon (Aug 2003, thier late) that will increase HD dramatically. A grand for the HD pvr though. OUCH!!!

      --
      I take no responsibility for what I say. Even though I'm never wrong :)
  15. DirecTV with TIVO is good by CasaDelGato · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've had DirecTV in the Seattle area for years. LOTS of rain and clouds. The only times I've lost signal is when the rain and clouds were so thick that it was dark at noon. Usually I had other problems occupying my attention at those times... :-\ I recently added a DirecTIVO (HDRV3) and added a 160GB drive to it. This makes a GREAT setup. Anytime I sit down, there is something that I WANT to see on. I do get NASA TV as well.

    1. Re:DirecTV with TIVO is good by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Let's just point out that NASA TV is not on DirecTV's main satellite, so the smallest dishes that only look at one satellite location will not be able to find it. You'll need one of the more complex DirecTV setups to get NASA TV if that's a dealbreaker...

  16. Satellite all the way by koreth · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I only keep my cable TV service (also Comcast) as an emergency backup in case my DirecTV receiver goes on the blink, and because I use a cable modem for my Internet access. The picture quality is much better on DirecTV than on my cable system, and I've never had reception drop out due to rain. The only thing that's knocked out my satellite reception has been a couple days of really strong winds, which knocked my dish out of alignment a few degrees. Five minutes on my rooftop afterwards fixed that.

    I'll put it this way: my cable modem has had more downtime than my satellite TV over the last two years, and every time I've checked, the cable TV feed has also been messed up whenever the cable modem has had trouble.

    Plus, if you get an integrated DirecTV/TiVo receiver, you get to time-shift your shows with zero quality loss. With a standalone TiVo there's an extra D/A conversion between the satellite receiver and the video cable, then an A/D conversion and a lossy compression step to get from the cable onto the TiVo's hard disk. I quite enjoy being able to make pristine archive DVDs of my favorite shows without any re-encoding at all.

    1. Re:Satellite all the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you get the archived shows off the DirecTV/TiVo to a machine with a DVD burner? I'm dying to know...

    2. Re:Satellite all the way by arf_barf · · Score: 1

      ...."DirecTV receiver goes on the blink,"....

      yeah right, you probably meant when there is an ECM or they shutoff the HU stream

    3. Re:Satellite all the way by koreth · · Score: 1
    4. Re:Satellite all the way by kiwimate · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'll put it this way: my cable modem has had more downtime than my satellite TV over the last two years, and every time I've checked, the cable TV feed has also been messed up whenever the cable modem has had trouble.

      Based on my experience with Comcast, this makes almost perfect sense. They have horrible service, and are frequently down.

      (Side-note: I have to laugh -- well, grimace, really -- at their local ads against the satellite crowd. They show a guy who contends he used to sell satellite TV, so he tried to install it himself and had no end of problems. Cue the shot of an installation literally held together by sticky tape. No kidding -- the chap's a salesman, he tries to install something himself on the cheap, can't even be bothered to use a screwdriver, and wonders why it keeps going out. Hell's bells.)

      About a year ago they used to advertise their cable modem service as having an advantage over dial-up of no dropped connections. I e-mailed them and pointed out that, when I was on-line and their service went down (which occurred two or three times a week on average), it sure as hell looked like a dropped connection to me. I'm sure they ignored me, but funnily enough they don't make that claim any more.

      The only caveat I have on the parent poster's comment is that our cable TV doesn't always go out when the cable modem is out (but it's probably 95% of the time).

      Hideously expensive compared to satellite, anecdotally worse, not better, reliability, and Comcast the ISP caps your bandwidth and refuses to tell you how much you're using and how much you're allowed to use -- just that you're using too much. Yeah, what's not to loathe about Comcast?

    5. Re:Satellite all the way by Palmzombie · · Score: 1

      Wow, I thought I had a problem last year when I climbed up on my roof to shovel out my Satellite dish from 26" of snow blocking its signal after 3 days with no service. But keeping Comcast as a backup? Do you keep a bag of backup dip for your chips in case you run out of dip?

      This of course done under the guise of preventing Ice Damming. "hey I'm up here already, might as well shovel out the dish, eh kids?".

      Other than an occasional dropout due to very heavy rain (when my Cable service is used to have would go out anyway), my DirectTV with Tivo is WAY better than Comcast. Those evils folks at Comcast offered to buy my Satellite Dish back..

      And now 3 free room installs and a regular (non-HD Tivo) for only $99, how could you even think of Comcast.

    6. Re:Satellite all the way by vladkrupin · · Score: 1

      I'll put it this way: my cable modem has had more downtime than my satellite TV over the last two years... ... and? Some things are just the basics of life. You've got to just accept them as they are - the grass is green, microsoft is a monopoly, cable modems are less reliably than your pinto, antarctica is cold...

      --

      Jobs? Which jobs?
    7. Re:Satellite all the way by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      Plus, if you get an integrated DirecTV/TiVo receiver, you get to time-shift your shows with zero quality loss. With a standalone TiVo there's an extra D/A conversion between the satellite receiver and the video cable, then an A/D conversion and a lossy compression step to get from the cable onto the TiVo's hard disk. I quite enjoy being able to make pristine archive DVDs of my favorite shows without any re-encoding at all.

      Just out of curiosity, how do you do that? They certainly don't advertise that as a feature and the DirecTivos I've seen only have a modem port so archiving over ethernet is out. Do you rip the hard drive out to archive stuff?

    8. Re:Satellite all the way by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Sidenote: The DirecTV DVR is in fact a TiVo. It uses TiVo software, so you get all of the goodies like Season Passes and WishLists. It also records two shows at once. It has better picture quality than any other SD DVR, and it records >30 hours on a 40gb HDD. You can easily add another HDD, too.

    9. Re:Satellite all the way by banda · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      I initally chose satellite over cable just out of sheer spite. I hate my cable company, and won't ever give them another penny. I won't go into details, but it was a matter of service quality being awful and their billing system causing deep repeated inconveniences for me.

      However, although my satellite decision was based on spite, it turns out that I get a better picture, virtually no interruptions, pleasant service, more channels, and all at a lower price.

    10. Re:Satellite all the way by case31 · · Score: 1

      I had Comcast for 2 years in Indianapolis and they absolutely SUCKED. My package included their internet service which was down constantly. I would call customer service and they had a recording (I became very familiar with it) that basically said, "We're down...deal with it".

      To add insult to injury, the moron that installed my cable tv service crossed up my line so that there was ground noise coming in and HE COULDN'T FIX IT. I had to buy a signal dampener to cut out the ground noise, then run the cable to a signal amplifier in order to get a viewable picture...totally ridiculous!

      There has only been one instance of weather-related issues with satellite, but it was a hell of a rain/wind/hail storm. I was just happy my dish wasn't ripped off of the house.

      The digital cable service they offered was $60 a month. With DirecTV, I have the 150 channel package with 8 HBO channels on 2 receivers. The cost? $48. That was probably the funniest thing about the pro-cable propaganda I always saw on Comcast...they would talk up their "better picture" and "having a receiver on each tv". You never heard the cable honks say that their service was cheaper. Also, if you have digital cable, don't you have to have a digital receiver on each tv...JUST LIKE SATELLITE???

    11. Re:Satellite all the way by slpalmer · · Score: 1

      With mine, a 90% signal, I was able to watch TV reliable during a tropical storm in Houston. The few times I have lost signal, it was back up within minutes.

      I should add. My next door neighbors Time-Warner cable was out for 2 days due to flooding at this same time.
    12. Re:Satellite all the way by mgg4 · · Score: 1

      I believe NASA TV is carried by DirecTV.

      No, I don't think so. I've not been able to find NASA TV on my DTV setup, and a quick check of the channel lineup at DirecTV does not mention NASA TV.

      I wish NASA TV were on DirecTV. It would be a good addition.

      --
      -- This space for rent.
    13. Re:Satellite all the way by slpalmer · · Score: 1
      It is offered, but it is not on the 'standard' satellite. You need a special setup to receive it.
      Quoting from: http://pub132.ezboard.com/fexcelsior30272frm14.sho wMessage?topicID=142.topic

      The way I understand it, one LNB will support two receivers. I have a dual lnb (the oval dish) system and it allows me to have up to four receivers. Currently I have two, with cable run for one more. The real reason to get the oval dish, which I assume the triple LNB dish is, is that it allows you to pick up a couple more channels that the standard 18" dish can't get for whatever reason. Among these channels are the NASA channel and several movie channels broadcast in High Definition format. The High Def thing was the reason I went with the oval as my main TV is a HighDef widescreen. When I get enough pennies saved up I'll buy a HD receiver and move the receiver I currently have to that third cable I've got run.
    14. Re:Satellite all the way by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I can confirm this - I get it in the winter.

      I used the dishmover service when I moved (take your box, leave the dish, and they'll install another one at your new home for free (which of course gives them another potential subscriber at your old address since they can just plug in a box and be running with no alignment/installation)). The installer didn't have any dual-LNB dishes handy like the one I was entitled to, so he just installed a multi-satellite dish free of charge. He even aligned all three satellites (apparently this is not easy to do on your own, unlike the standard round dish).

      Alas - I do not really have a clear path to the south for the third satellite, so I only get a signal in the winter when the leaves are gone...

      FYI - the reason for the oval dish is that DirecTV has three satellites. Two are at 109/110 degrees longitude (or something like that) and the thrid is at 119 degrees. The first two are so close that a parabolic dish can focus both signals. The third is far enough away that this doesn't work - you need an eliptical dish so that it can focus over a wider range of longitudes (which also means that you have to align the tilt as well as heading and elevation to get all three). The third satellite is used for HDTV, a few oddball channels, and some foreign-language programming - stuff that doesn't sell well in general (and the folks who can afford HDTV will pay an installer anyway so they don't care about it being harder to align).

      As far as having extra LNB's goes - you only need two to handle an infinte number of receivers, though you need a fancy box to route additional receivers. This is because a single LNB can handle either left or right-polarized signals, and with two of them you can get both at the same time, you just need a fancy box to send the right signals to the right receivers at the right time. The oval dish has a 4-way version of this box built-in.

  17. Re:die tv die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess you haven't looked too much at that whole "internet" thing then, huh...

  18. seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nix the tv and get a girlfriend. you won't regret it. you coming on slashdot and whining about your confusion makes you look like a loser.

  19. commercials? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

    I was looking at this too - but mostly because I wanted HD. Comcast doesn't offer high definition everywhere yet. As I keep hearing, it'll be "by the end of this year" (three years and counting). Satellite appears to offer HD much sooner, but for much more money. I stuck with cable for the price - which is awfully sad, considering how expensive it is. Look at the commercials: cable says that satellite is crappy and satellite says that cable is crappy. That should be enough evidence for this conclusion: don't judge based on commercials.

  20. DirecTV *does* have pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Uhhhh.....

    One major problem with that. DirecTV most certainly *does* have PORN. Something like 6 or so channels, plus it's offered on a few of the PPV channels in addition to Spice, Hot Network, Playboy, etc. Good stuff too. Not just the HBO/Skinimax R rated soft-core crap, but real honest PORN.

    And yeah, I posted this anonymously for a reason. :)

    1. Re:DirecTV *does* have pr0n by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny
      Good stuff too. Not just the HBO/Skinimax R rated soft-core crap, but real honest PORN.

      And yeah, I posted this anonymously for a reason. :)

      Mom, I told you to stop posting to Slashdot!

    2. Re:DirecTV *does* have pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hell.. DirecTV has HDTV Pron!

      More info here!

    3. Re:DirecTV *does* have pr0n by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "And yeah, I posted this anonymously for a reason. :)"

      Mr Hat gave you away.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:DirecTV *does* have pr0n by Cramer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Uhh, that should be "real honest pr0n"

    5. Re:DirecTV *does* have pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll stick with Broadcast TV.
      Heck, have you seen the Superbowl Half-time show?

      And its free!

    6. Re:DirecTV *does* have pr0n by webroach · · Score: 1

      And yeah, I posted this anonymously for a reason. :)

      Yeah? Well I'M not afraid! I like porn! =^)

      I hear it's always spoken well of me, as well...

    7. Re:DirecTV *does* have pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good stuff too. Not just the HBO/Skinimax R rated soft-core crap, but real honest PORN. And yeah, I posted this anonymously for a reason. :)

      Mom, I told you to stop posting to Slashdot!

      Dad, when did Grandma start posting to Slashdot?

  21. Get a larger dish for satellite TV by RickyRay · · Score: 5, Informative

    Weather doesn't necessarily cause problems for satellite channels. I paid a little extra to install oversized dishes (30" - 36"), and during the worst rain or snow my reception is always good.

  22. In the unlikely event by nil5 · · Score: 0

    ... of a pre-emptive nuclear strike, the enemy would likely destroy any broadcast satellites. They can't get your coax so easily...

    The Russkies have had anti-satellite tech. since the 60's.

    Just a thought.

    1. Re:In the unlikely event by btgarner · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but once your power goes out, your cable connection is gone too... with a generator, your DSS will work just fine.

    2. Re:In the unlikely event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an aspect of the decision I had not considered.

      However, searching on comcast on the web and reading some of their policies, it seems that comcast themselves are downright stalinist. In fact, I wonder what that COMcast stands for ? COMmies, no doubt. I'll take my chances with the satillites before mailing a monthly check to those bastards.

    3. Re:In the unlikely event by MisterMook · · Score: 1

      If you're gloating over your clear digital cable signal after a pre-emptive nuclear strike,I think you deserve all the leather clad mutant bikers from the Wastelands that spite can suffer.

  23. It's amazing the satellite companies haven't sued. by raam · · Score: 1


    I've had a DirecTV DVR for about a year now and have never lost a signal through multiple windstorms, heavy rain, etc. On top of that, I live in the rainy northwest...

  24. Sat is good if.... by sogoodsofarsowhat · · Score: 1

    you can get your locals. (or any locals). Get a Direct Tivo. Align your dish properly and you wont lose signal unless the storm is so bad that cable would be out also. Sat is up 99% of the time. Only during the worst rain or snow does it go down. Now if you mount you dish like they show them in the cable commerical expect trouble....do it right the first time and never screw with it in Lets see 6 years and counting..... There are lots of PVR and DVR's but there is still only one TIVO!

    --
    . I love the sound of burning women and screaming rubber....
  25. Satellite nono by 0x54524F4C4C · · Score: 0


    Satellite data links have huge latencies, so dont count on them to play counterstirke. Also, if you get a storm, go do something else, your link is dead. Otherwise it is good - in particular in these fucked up places in the world where you and me get sent by our nice companies.

    1. Re:Satellite nono by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1
      Satellite data links have huge latencies, so dont count on them to play counterstirke. Also, if you get a storm, go do something else, your link is dead. Otherwise it is good - in particular in these fucked up places in the world where you and me get sent by our nice companies.
      As the poster said, he wasn't interested in it for broadband internet access. He already has DSL.
      Upload is via dial up. Does anyone have satelite upload capability ? Does it even exist ?
      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    2. Re:Satellite nono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check directv it does 2 way sat stuff now...

  26. Slow news day? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ask Slashdot: Burger and fries vs. fish and chips? Jesus. It's not that slow a news day.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Slow news day? by mpitcavage · · Score: 1

      I think this is a pretty valid inquiry, with the cost of cable increasing in direct proportion to the availability of satellite, cable vs. satellite is probably the biggest budget/tech decision for the average person right now, with "replacing my land line with my cell phone" coming in second.

    2. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fish and chips, but only with vinegar. Bonus points if it is in a rolled up newpaper.

  27. blAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BLAH

  28. Tivo! by apoplectic · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've got DirecTV with a DirecTivo that was provided in a package deal (Sony T60). It has been a wonderful combination. I have yet to be unhappy in any way, shape, or form. At the time, I got the DVR for $99 as I was a first time DirecTV subscriber. I would encourage you to get some similar deal. I had digital cable before and couldn't stand it after sampling DirecTV at a friends house. You will NOT be disappointed. Now, I understand that the HD Tivos will be coming out soon (the current Tivos do not support High Def)...you might want to wait until one of these hits the market (quite possibly combined with the rather new feature of being able to burn your shows to DVD). I'd guess this happens in the 2 to 6 month range, though I'm not sure how long (if ever) the combo HD/DVD/DirecTV units will be in coming.

  29. DirecTV for me by mbadolato · · Score: 4, Informative

    About two years ago, I got extremly pissed off with Cox Digital Cable (Every day for an hour or so, all the premium movie channels would go black; they kept sending techs, no one could find a problem)

    I switched to DirecTV and haven't looked back since. Now, granted I'm in Phoenix so weather isn't exactly a factor here. But, even with the monsoons in the summer, i've only lost picture about 1 or 2 times, and that was only for a short duration.

    When I saw that Best Buy was selling a DirecTV receiver/Tivo unit for $99, I jumped on it. We had a Tivo already but this was one unit, smaller, bigger drive, two inputs, and dolby built it.

    I couldn't be any happier, and i'm glad i went this route.

  30. Some stats on the issue by prostoalex · · Score: 1

    In the United States cable owns 75% of the market, while satellite only has 22%. 10 years ago cable had pretty much a monopoly on non-broadcast channels.

  31. Trent by tljohnsn · · Score: 0

    If your dish is aimed properly, it will prolly cut out less than your cable will be down for technical diffuculties.

    Aiming the dish optimally is essential.

  32. Signal loss... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1, Funny

    The only time I loose satellite signal is when a tree grows in the way (happened last year, cut down the tree no problem) or when there is *very* heavy rain on the way. Mostly when it is still dry at the house, but the BIIG storm front is between the dish and hte satellite. Knocks out reception for a moment, and then all is fine.

    Cable isn't an option where I am - no cables.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    1. Re:Signal loss... by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

      I don't know why someone modded this as funny. My in-laws live on a farm in Arkansas and I installed DishNetwork for them about five or six years ago. Last summer, they said that reception was getting iffy. I stepped outside and noticed that since getting rid of their chickens (stop laughing, it's true!), they'd let some trees grow along a fence row. I got their chainsaw out and within a few minutes their signal strength had moved from 80 to 112.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  33. direcTV by morelife · · Score: 1, Informative

    If the sun is out, and the weather's beautiful, dish works beautifully. Under these conditions you probably won't be inside watching tv.

    I switched to cable from direcTV. The rain, snow, wind, vibration, installation limitations due to authorized "line of sight", distant tree limbs, and plain bad luck, all caused bad, horrible or no reception. After a rainstorm, my signal would stay at 60% or less because of heavy cloud cover.

    I switched to cable, all problems disappeared. Also I noticed the bandwidth on the audio portion was much improved quality and intensity. In retrospect I was not happy with direcTV at all. Couldn't imagine having an Internet connection on it.

    1. Re:direcTV by tommck · · Score: 1

      If the sun is out, and the weather's beautiful, dish works beautifully. Under these conditions you probably won't be inside watching tv

      You're kidding, right?

      You're not reading posts on Home & Garden's website... this is Slashdot baby! Home of the pasty-white couch geek!

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
  34. Local Channels by manganese4 · · Score: 1

    If you happen to be in the hinterlands (more than 60 miles from a > 500,000 population area) you may not get local channels with directv or dish. You can get a separate antennae and switch back and forth between noraml and sat tv. The only annoying things is you have to turn off you sat receiver because of RF interference. This is a real problem if you get TIVO with your sat dish since the TIVO device has no off switch (why would you ever need to turn TIVO off??). Since the TIVO is integrated in with the Sat received, you cannot turn off the sat receiver and then have trouble seeing local channels 2 to 6.

    --
    I make my face look like this and concerned words come out.
    1. Re:local channels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and I should mentioned that those experiences were two and three years ago, so service local-channel service may have been supplied to more areas since then. But can you imagine my surprise when I was told the state capital could not receive local channels?

  35. Phillies/Flyers/Sixers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll be missing a lot of games if you go with the dish. If you don't follow those teams, don't mind this consideration.

  36. DirecTV is good by tekiegreg · · Score: 3, Informative

    No I'm not a paid endoreser of them, nor do I wish to Spam, but in my experience, for $45/month for 150 channels (including NASA TV, all the basic channels but no premiums like HBO) amongst other wonderful channels with real content, I stay happy. Good value for my $ if you ask me.

    Adelphia is the local cable company in my area, and while they have a promo rate of $19/month for 3 months I'm awfully suspicous of that rate after my 3 months are up and they are not willingly disclosing it. They seem kinda scummy to me.

    Near as I can tell, weather conditions don't affect Satellites much either. My Satellite was doing just fine in big rainstorms here (I was a bit nervous about turning on my equipment in a big thunderstorm here not too long ago tho so I can't vouch for thunderstorms). My Dad who lives up in the mountains and has had many snowstorms has never complained about any issues with his Satellites (tho in all Fairness he's a DISH subscriber).

    DVR? Can't help you there, people have been telling me to get one but they're appeal to me is limited.

    Internet access? I've been told it's ok if not quite a bit laggy, but no firsthand experience myself either. For my high speed Internet I use DSL quite happily (again avoiding Adelphia like the plaque).

    In short Satellite I think is a good value for the $. However your experiences may vary.

    --
    ...in bed
    1. Re:DirecTV is good by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Adelphia is the local cable company in my area, and while they have a promo rate of $19/month for 3 months I'm awfully suspicous of that rate after my 3 months are up and they are not willingly disclosing it."

      IU owuld assume they disclose it in the contract. If not, they'll have a lot of people getting out of there contract.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:DirecTV is good by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 1

      Comcast did the same thing... $19.95 for three months and then your rate goes to... $159.90 with digital cable and cable internet. I'll be changing my plan very soon.

    3. Re:DirecTV is good by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

      JEEBUS!!! For that I could almost get my very own T-1 line...there is something to be said for honesty and telling us the real rate (DirecTV never tried a promo rate gimmick and was always upfront about rates). They'll have my business for as long as they continue this practice, even if they do raise rates every so often...

      --
      ...in bed
    4. Re:DirecTV is good by jmichaelg · · Score: 2, Funny
      (again avoiding Adelphia like the plaque).

      I'll bet you're one of those guys who flosses three times a day.

    5. Re:DirecTV is good by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

      True that, I could always take a closer look at the fine print of the contract, but initially if the starting rates or promo offers seem weird and not entirely upfront, I generally worry that I'll get fineprinted to death by something I didn't see.

      This is my problem with doing anything with Adelphia. I want to know the prices upfront and in my face. Not what you'll stick me with behind my back unaware in 3 months.

      --
      ...in bed
    6. Re:DirecTV is good by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

      Actually now I want to take something back about the rain, apparently there was a big storm last night that produced enough cloud cover to finally cover our line of sight to the satellite, no TV last night :-(. All the same 1 out of every 4 or 5 rainstorms isn't too bad I suppose, cable probably goes out every so often as well, no?

      --
      ...in bed
  37. Boycott comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just do a few web searches on comcast and you will quickly conclude that they aren't a company you want to be dealing with.

    Problems with the signal on satillite dishes usually aren't the rain or snow in the air, it's the collection of it on the dish. If you wipe the dish with a rag greased with baby oil rain will sheet of it quickly even in the heaviest downfall. If you absolutely can't miss one minute, run one of the those heating elements that you can use to keep pipes from freezing up there, and have a switch on the inside of the house, so you can melt off accumulated ice if you need to.

    My real, heart-to-heart advice, however ? Sell your TV. There's nothing on.

  38. Cable by Kid+Zero · · Score: 1

    Cable has a better chance of having local channels, most of the time. Sattelite does indeed go out during bad weather, both Direct TV and Dish have that problem. Otherwise, the dishes were slightly cheaper...

  39. Re:I'M BACK, SLASH-BITCHES by solefald · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    TiVO _IS_ running linux...

  40. Satellite all the way by slpalmer · · Score: 5, Informative

    My personal experiance on this (DirecTV Subscriber 7 years, Time Warner Analog and Digital for 5 years) is that Digital Satellite beats Digital Cable hands down.

    Everything that the cable companies say (with the exception of the dog sneezing) may be true, but it's exaggerated to the point of borderline lies.

    If your dish is aimed to achieve a signal in the "85%" range, which is quite easy to do, you won't have much of any problem with rain or weather fades. With mine, a 90% signal, I was able to watch TV reliable during a tropical storm in Houston. The few times I have lost signal, it was back up within minutes.

    With Digital Cable, I discover that I lose signal anytime they're working on a line, construction hits a cable, flooding at their office, you name it. *At Least* a full day outage every month or two.

    As for channels, Who has what depends on what day of the week it is. I believe NASA TV is carried by DirecTV. I'm not sure about Comcast, as they don't sell in my area.

    Cable touts how owning your own equipment is bad. This reminds me of the old AT&T / BellSouth argument that they should own the phones and lease them to you. Guess what, Cable companies aren't supplying that digital converter for free. It costs more to rent that box than the extra that local channels cost on Satellite.

    As for DVR, the DVR's supplied by either cable or satellite companies are low end models. If they fit your needs, go for it. If you want the latest and greatest, buy or build your own.

    I say DirectTV is the way to go.

  41. I have both by PenguinRadio · · Score: 1

    I have DishNetwork and Comcast (long story). I find that the picture is (usually) clearer on the dish, and the sound is much better (from the major broadcast networks). On cable stations, it's about the same, though sometimes certain channels will lose a bit of a color late in the day or for some reason on the Dish (I have a 56' inch widescreen so I'm a bit picky about my picture quality).

    I should note that there is a good three second delay on the Dish, which is kind of annoying when you are on the phone talking to someone about a football game and they know the result before you. I'll talk to my father about a 4th and goal and he'll say "Touchdown!" before the ball even snaps on my Dish feed. A few seconds later I see the play.

    Yes, rain messes things up, but we're talking big time thunderstorms (not just your normal USA rain). If it is really bad, you can lose the signal for a while (it comes and goes).

    My dish also offeres both the East and West Showtimes/HBOs which is nice when you miss something you can see it three hours later (not sure if your comcast does that).

    My reason for Dish was Fox Sports World, which my local comcast didn't get. I never would have gotten the dish if the local guys offered that channel, but they didn't so tough.

    Whatever you chose, get a TIVO like PVR. It rocks.

    1. Re:I have both by MarkGriz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm no fan of cable TV, and have been a happy DTV customer for about a year.
      But just to be fair, even a "perfect" signal going into your standalone Tivo in Best Quality, will never match the picture quality you'll get from your DTivo. This is primarily because of the inferior MPEG encoding on the SA Tivo, compared to the industrial strength encoding done by DirectTV before it goes over the satellite.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    2. Re:I have both by ever+vigilant · · Score: 1

      I own a Tivo system that acts as a reciever for DirecTV, its great for recording and all, but I have one irk with it. Channel progression, it takes at least two to three seconds to progress to another channel, and about five to retrieve guide info. otherwise, I enjoy it wholeheartedly

  42. Cable is way cheaper for us. by SoCalChris · · Score: 1

    We have Charter Cable in Long Beach, Ca. Basic cable tv for us costs $16/month, and includes History Channel, Learning Channel, Discovery Channel, Court TV, Tech TV, Spike, ESPN, and many more. Cable internet service through them costs us $40/month, for 2mb downstream. So far, I've been extremely happy with them. We were paying for the 756k down, but a few months ago they bumped all current subscribers to 2mb down free for 6 months.

    My only complain is that they limit newsgroup download speed to 256k, and block port 80.

    Over all, their downtime has been minimal over the past year, and service has been excellent.

    We use them with Vonage for our phone service. For what our POTS cost at our last apartment, we now get the phone, Cable TV, and broadband, and it is still a little cheaper than the POTS was.

  43. ahhh, the joys of renting... by garcia · · Score: 2, Informative

    In some apartments (in what I feel is a violation of FCC rules but what the FCC feels isn't) they require that you place large amounts of money down on a "deposit" just to put the dish on the porch (regardless of the fact that it might be free standing).

    See here for a quick link I found. Note: (2) unreasonably increase the cost of installation, maintenance or use, or

    Forcing me to pay $350 deposit (of which only $75 is refunded at the END of your renting) seems to push the FREE installation costs over "reasonable".

    So, Comcast is prewired into the building and I have no choice but to use the good 'ol rabbit ears.

    1. Re:ahhh, the joys of renting... by dcm1101 · · Score: 1

      The $275 non-refundable portion does not seem reasonable under the FCC's definitions. Here is the actual FCC information on the subject. One huge problem with the FCC rules when it comes to satellite reception is that they only preserve your right to place antennas on property you directly control, which means that if you only have windows or balconies that face North, or if you have Southern exposure, but there are obstructions that prevent you from seeing the satellite, then you're out of luck.

    2. Re:ahhh, the joys of renting... by poptix_work · · Score: 1

      In some apartments (in what I feel is a violation of FCC rules but what the FCC feels isn't) they require that you place large amounts of money down on a "deposit" just to put the dish on the porch (regardless of the fact that it might be free standing).

      I solved that problem =)

      --
      Just because you disagree doesn't make it offtopic or flamebait.
    3. Re:ahhh, the joys of renting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not all of us have a room that has nothing but junk in it that we can put a dish on the floor ;) I believe we have already had this conversation in that unmentionable IRC channel you frequent ;)

    4. Re:ahhh, the joys of renting... by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      Stand up for your rights, pussy, or they will be forever taken away. Federal law prohibits the prohibition of satellite dishes. I'm pretty sure they can't make you put down an unrefundable deposit either; that's just a strongarm tactic to force you to be a pussy. Stand up for your rights. Be the first to have a dish. I told my friend the same, he did, didn't pay the security deposit, and made waves -- after everyone else realized they didn't have to be pussies, they all got dishes in that complex. That's the real reason they use prohibitive fees -- they want to stop the "ugliness" of the dishes.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  44. Anonymous for a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a nutshell - it doesn't matter which you get. Sat TV or digital cable, it's all the same in the end. Cable has the advantage with Video on Demand, which let's you rent movies for 24 hours or so and gives you the ability to fast forward, rewind, pause, play, stop etc and all of it's streamed from the cable company.

    But, let me tell you, if you wanna steal something - it's sat tv. a few hundred dollars on ebay to buy a dish + DVR/Tuner combo, couple bucks via friends for the smart card and BAM, next thing ya know free TV.

    I've had it free for quite sometime, and it's FINALLY worth more then I paid hehe. It's pretty cool being able to watch a dozen diffrent FOX/ABC/CBS/NBC channels all across the nation, having all the pay channels open, and getting virtually every football, baseball, hockey, basketball game aired.

    Indeed, it is truly the 8th wonder of the world.

    Chance of being caught: NIL - if you don't A) Plug in the phone jack and B) Go through proper channels to secure the card

    Enjoy!

  45. Dish Network by btgarner · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have been a Dish Network customer for over 6 years, and prefer it over cable. I have an 80 Gb PVR with my system, and get 180 channels for under $45/month. The signal used to go out (but only during HEAVY rain) with the older systems, but since I upgraded to their 500 network, I cannot recall a single outage.

    The only drawback with the DSS systems is that local channels may not be available (or if they are available, will run you an extra $5 per month)

    From what I have seen, the DSS and cable companies offerings are pretty much equal. it really will boil down to what channels you want, at what price each service offers that selection, and then the service of those companies. Dish had soem serious growing pains a few years ago, but they seem to mostly be over them (or I have just gotten used to them).

    My local cable company (TWC - who provides my internet access at home) has a terrible track record for billing issues, and if DSL were available where I live, I would dump TWC in a heardbeat soi that I don't give them any more money.

    1. Re:Dish Network by /dev/trash · · Score: 1
      The only drawback with the DSS systems is that local channels may not be available (or if they are available, will run you an extra $5 per month)


      I just got my locals Friday. I was paying 12 bucks to get the network feeds. With my locals I save 4 bucks a month by dropping those feeds.

  46. Had both, would prefer a dish, but Comcast is fine by vjlen · · Score: 1

    I'm currently living in an apartment, and a dish is not an option, due to my unit's facing/location.

    I used to have DirecTV when I was a homeowner and married, and was very happy with it (the service, not the marriage part *grin*) I can only remember one time where a severe thunderstorm temporarily knocked out service as the storm passed.

    I've never had a problem with Comcast re: video programming or service, and currently using them as my ISP as well.

    If I move and it became an issue again on which to pick, I would go with DirecTV again, only because NHL Center Ice reruns games overnight and in the morning, whereas Comcast's version of Center Ice does not.

    Seriously, my advice is to look at the price and programming. Everyone has their horror stories which will make either cable or dish service look bad, but it's usually not the norm.

  47. Re:I'M BACK, SLASH-BITCHES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (I know this is a troll... but I'll bite.)

    uh, yeah -- Tivo runs *on* linux...

  48. South Florida resident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only get weather related issues when there is a big storm cell in direct LOS of the satellite. And I mean a big, shaking the pictures off the wall thunder, storm. We had 48 hours of non-stop drizzly type rain this weekend and didn't loose my signal.

  49. Cable.. by JayPee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm pretty happy with cable and now that a friend who workd for AOL/Time Warner pointed out a little secret, I'll be even more so.

    Cable companies make money by selling those pre-configured 'packages' of channel choices. With digital cable, however, it's quite simple for them to control which channels your receiver displays. By law, the cable companies MUST allow you to pick and choose which channels you wish to pay for.

    Finally, being able to get all the Discovery channels whilst avoiding the shite like AMC or other such ilk.

  50. another option by squarefish · · Score: 1

    is here

    seriously though, a friend of mine used to have tv smashing parties every fourth of july (independence day) for about 10 years. He just stopped having the last year which totally sucked because so many people always looked forward to that particular party.

    personally, I don't watch tv unless I'm at a bar or someone's house that has one on. I have an eyetv hooked up to my mac, but only use it as a device to play vcr tapes.

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  51. Hardly ever lose Sat signal by Nos. · · Score: 1

    As a prime example, last weekend we had the mother of all blizzards blow through south Saskatchewan. (I had to spend 2 hours shovelling out the next morning, almost couldn't get the front door open). However, I never once lost the satellite signal. From my experience, the only time I have lost signal, is when there are electrical storms overhead, or in the direction your dish points. Aside from that, I've watched TV in most weather conditions that the praries can throw at you.

  52. DirecTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have used it for years and I have not noticed anything really annoying. It goes out during very bad rainstorms and sometimes the snow has to be dusted off but that is about it. If you can get a TIVO combo then I say go for it.

  53. Truth vs myth by Steepe · · Score: 1

    Sat is MUCH cheaper compared to cable, especially digital cable. you can get everything for about $75/month from either company where it would cost me around $120 to get everything on comcast, and its not as many channels.

    YES you WILL lose signal when it rains hard, but I keep a signal strength in the 93 range in clear weather, and it has to be coming down pretty hard to take it out. a light rain won't mess with your signal at all, nor will wind as long as you have a solid mount point for the dish.

    I'd get the dvr that comes from the comapny, you can get them free if you sign up for a year of service, so why not. If you just want to get one to geek out then set up a linux box and run mythtv. :)

    Hope this helps.

    --
    Just three more hours seapeople and you can finally take me away from this crappy God Damned planet full of hippies
  54. This is something I've been considering lately too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recently, my cable company moved the PPV channel off the analog cable, and replaced it with something called OneTV. At the same time, they had the nerve to raise their rates. So, to get that channel back (so I can order the occasional event), I need to upgrade to digital cable. My nearly $50 bill will become a nearly $65 bill in the process.

    I looked at DirecTV, and I can get their system with two receivers for $45 a month. Not only would it be cheaper than what I pay now, but I'd get more channels, and I suspect a better quality picture. My only real concerns are that I live in an apartment, although it seems the FCC made a ruling allowing me to use a small dish. I'm also fortunate that I have a primarily southern view, so I should be able to aim the dish easily.

    The major downside to the dish and digital cable, though, is that I lose the ability to use my TV tuner card for channel changing. I'd need to use the box, and possibly something to communicate between my computer and the box to change channels (when I'm not around). It's really unfortunate they haven't come up with a standard way of externally changing channels on these boxes. Would it be that hard to have some sort of serial interface?

  55. Antenna by skedastik · · Score: 1

    I use an antenna on my tv, so I won't be too much help. But, comparing packages in my area (comcast vs. dish network vs. direcTv) dish network and directv are the best. Basically w/ 1 premium channel and w/ a comparable lineup the dish averages out to $15 - $20 cheaper a month, includes multiple rooms, and DVR. Cable doesn't require a contract though which is a huge plus. So basically if you get the dish and it sucks you are stuck with it for 12 months. Or you can use this new invention called an antenna and you can watch TV for free!

  56. Depends... by strredwolf · · Score: 1

    Since you already have DSL, you're kinda set. However, you may not have local stations with your satellite service -- I know one service here in Maryland/DC area doesn't carry a DC area station, and was advertised as such on that station.

    However, cable is comming back though. Most service providers use "digital cable" which means the signal from the provider's regional HQ to the localized distribution node is digital. That also means HDTV signals can come in, as well as more channels and Internet service. Comcast is advertizing that now. So, there's a bit of a match.

    The only difference is if you do not have broadband access. A good amount of customers can't get DSL (including me). We have to use cable or dialup. Thus, cable it is.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
  57. DirecTv by hague · · Score: 1

    I dropped cable many years ago and have four DirecTv boxes in the house so I can record multiple things at the same time and watch different channels in different rooms. Channel lineup is important to me. My favorite channel, Tech TV (with The Screen Savers show), is only available on DirecTv in Indianapolis. A heavy, wet snow will sometimes pack in the dish and I have to sweep it out. A heavy thunderstorm can sometimes black the signal out for a few minutes. The picture is typically better than cable. The DVR version required a dual-LNB dish and two cables routed from the dish to the box. Enjoy!

  58. I've had both. by MoOsEb0y · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've used both satellite (dish network) and comcast cable. Let me tell you, I've had more outages with comcast than with dish. The dish only went out when it was an ice storm. And let me tell you, I didn't even have power half the time. Every time it rains here, literally my cable goes out. Don't believe the ads saying they lost the "pitcha".

  59. I've had both by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Cheaper more channels with Sattalite

    Better quality with digital cable.

    But it was fun with satalite to use the reception as a weather predictor. It didn't go out every time it rained or snowed, only 5-7 minutes before a big thunderstorm or blizzard. So it gave me enough warning to check my car windows. Insight cable is just now starting to offer some channels that I loved on satalite, but I think this is more due to the historical reasons in my area (rockford, IL).

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  60. Been a suscriber for a few years by Str8Dog · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't know much about digital cable but I can tell you a few things about DirecTV having been a subscriber for several years. I live in the Seattle area and it rains here a lot. We have never had a problem with rain fade. The only time my signal drops to a unwatchable level, it is due to someone bumping it on the way up the stairs (dish is in a bad location and easy to bump if you are carting stuff up the stairs.).

    The down side is the year long contact you must agree to for service. If you want to cancel early they charge your something like $12/month left on the contact. There is a $5/month charge for equipment per room. And finally DirecTV has had great problems getting me a bill in the mail each month. I don't really know why, but I had to start paying my bills online just to make sure they didn't try to ding me for late fees.

    Finally, I would like to point out DirecTV's private war on piracy. You might want to check out sites like Freedom Fight and make sure you morally agree with DirecTV's methods of (IMHO) extortion.

    --


    Str8Dog
    using System.Darkside; public
    1. Re:Been a suscriber for a few years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Seattle reception is good because DirectTV uses half their satelites to service the Northwest area. With all the precipitation you'd be SOL otherwise.

  61. Satellite Outtages are Completely Overrated by ZaMoose · · Score: 1

    In the year that I've had DirecTV, the only outtages that I've experienced have been during the strongest of electrical storms. This winter's snow systems haven't even slightly affected our signal.

    Of course, YMMV.

    --
    I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    1. Re:Satellite Outtages are Completely Overrated by SirCodeAlot · · Score: 1

      Agree Completely, my cable went out more than my Direct TV ever has...It's a myth

  62. Having had both... by danuary · · Score: 2, Informative

    Used to live in a house where I had Dish Network. It was fine, carried NASA-TV, etc. EXPENSIVE though - my bill for 'most everything was more than $100/mo. It would rarely go out -- usually not -during- storms, but just before -- anywhere from 30 sec to 30 min. It'd have to be a pretty good sized storm coming in, though. Moved to the city and now I have Time Warner Cable. It's cheaper (about $80) for everything, AND YOU CAN GET A DIGITAL CABLE BOX WITH A BUILT-IN DVR. Very very useful. Works in all respects similar to TiVo except for the automatic taping of things it thinks you'd be interested in. There's an additional $6/mo charge to use it... That being said, channel choices are not as good - no NASA TV. All in all, I'm impressed with TW. Their customer service is pretty good, the installer was plesant and on-time when the service was set up, and in six months of service (knock wood), I've not had a single outage on my cablemodem or TV service. Cablemodem is FAST too - 3mbps down, 384kbps up.

    1. Re:Having had both... by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Oo -- Time-Warner cable modem. I hope you don't download use more than 15 GB of uploads + downloads per month, or you'll hit the cap and get a nastygram demanding that you upgrade to the $80-90/month service (with its 40 GB cap).

      Also, you can get a DVR from DishNet including a HD-DVR soon. It too lacks the inherent coolness of TiVo's ability to find shows for you.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    2. Re:Having had both... by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've got Dish Network in the SF bay area and I pay just over 100 a month. But that 100 a month gets me WAY more than I ever got with TCI/ATT/Comcast/whatever the company is this month. For the money I pay, I get the 150 channels, 5 HBOs, 5 Showtimes, 9 Encores and other movie channels I never seem to watch. But the kicker for me was the ability to get overseas programming. I get Italian, Spanish and French on their "a la carte" plan, meaning each channel is 5 bucks more a month. As far as I know, no cable company inthe US offers European programming. In the bay area at least, the best you can do is the one multinational channel plus the three or four Spanish (US-based) channels.

    3. Re:Having had both... by kriston · · Score: 2, Informative

      TWC in Queens (New York City for you non-Merkins is still a hybrid digital/analog system. The channels you get on the analog "tier" are still analog when you subscribe to the digital service. The "extra" channels in the digital service are digital and there is some duplication of premium channels in the digital side of things. Where I live, in Fairfax, VA, the cable systems have gone 100% digital. One night all the analog boxes were turned off and the cable company parked a customer-service van at the entrance of our subdivision to swap-in digital cable boxes.

      Kris

      --

      Kriston

    4. Re:Having had both... by sinnergy · · Score: 1

      Cox and Adelphia offer International programming here in the Cleveland area last time I checked... and I don't just mean SCOLA.

    5. Re:Having had both... by xkenny13 · · Score: 1

      Time-Warner cable modem. I hope you don't download use more than 15 GB of uploads + downloads per month, or you'll hit the cap and get a nastygram demanding that you upgrade to the $80-90/month service (with its 40 GB cap).

      I'm sure this varies from area to area. I *know* I download more than 15gb per month, and have been doing so for at least a year. Time Warner (Socal RR) has never raised an eyebrow at my (excessive) usage of their (unlimited) service.

    6. Re:Having had both... by Hentai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Idea (And what I'm preparing to do):

      Keep your DSL. Get Cable + cable broadband. Have all your 'server' stuff go through DSL, and all your surfing go through cable.

      Double your bandwidth for just another $30/mo!

      --
      -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
    7. Re:Having had both... by Zane+Edwards · · Score: 1

      All that TV and you spend your time posting in /.

    8. Re:Having had both... by MullerMn · · Score: 1

      TWC in Queens (New York City for you non-Merkins is ...

      Hmm. AFAIK, atleast in the UK, a Merkin is the name for a pubic wig. Queens must be an interesting place.. ;)

    9. Re:Having had both... by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 1
      Where I live, in Fairfax, VA, the cable systems have gone 100% digital. One night all the analog boxes were turned off and the cable company parked a customer-service van at the entrance of our subdivision to swap-in digital cable boxes.

      This worries me and is the reason I suspect that getting digital cable actually caused by cable bill to shrink. I suspect my provider wants to move everyone to digital so that they can cut analog service. Sure, more channels is nice and all, but my TV, VCR, and Tivo all know how to tune to analog cable, not digital. I don't want to fiddle around with a stupid IR Blaster.

    10. Re:Having had both... by kriston · · Score: 1

      The short answer is to switch to DirecTV. The need for IR blasters goes away instantly and you still get more channels than digital cable, and for far less money.

      Kris

      --

      Kriston

    11. Re:Having had both... by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 1
      The short answer is to switch to DirecTV. The need for IR blasters goes away instantly...

      Well, that only solves the Tivo problem if I'm willing to get one of the DirectTivos (or whatever they got rebranded to). The DirectTivos are really nice, but I've already got one that I've paid for a lifetime subscription on. And I'm still left with problems with my existing VCR, or the little TV in my bedroom (for which it seems silly to attach a dedicated receiver given how rarely I use it). To say nothing of the problems if I decide to try and hook a computer up to the input stream. I'm also concerned about supporting any company willing to sue the innocent along with the guilty in a sort of legal carpet-bombing.

    12. Re:Having had both... by kriston · · Score: 1

      Sorry, if I can clarify, I also have regular analog TiVo. The TiVo communicates with the DirecTV box through the serial port on the back. The S-Video output of the DirecTV machine goes into the TiVo. It's better this way because you can choose the quality of the video. The DirecTiVo machine does not allow you to do that. I record the kids' cartoons at basic quality and our regular shows at medium quality, something we could not do with DirecTiVo.

      I would recommend looking at any satellite provider--you can still use your old TiVo with any of them.

      Enjoy,

      Kris

      --

      Kriston

  63. Dish vs. Cable by vjmurphy · · Score: 1

    I've got Dish Network and I'm generally happy with it: the picture is a lot better than cable in my area, and the HD channels are nice.

    During bad snowstorms, the snow piles up on the dish, which can cause outtages. During heavy rain, I tend to not watch TV anyhow, but I do get some rain losses.

    As for DVRs, with DirectTV, you are in luck, since they have Tivo as a partner. However, Dish uses their own PVR, which is not nearly as nice as Tivo. However, Dish does have their HDTV PVR shipping, but Tivo doesn't have its offering available yet.

    I use a standalone Tivo with my Dish receiver, though, and it works just fine. However, in general, getting the built in PVR is better for picture quality: the DirecTivo can save the satellite signal digitally, while a standalone Tivo would have conversions in between.

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
  64. Snow not a problem up north... by sbowles · · Score: 1
    "I have had problems with loss of signal ... when snow covers the dish"

    In Canada, our dishes have to be pointed so close to the horizon that snow never stays on them.

    --
    You sly dog: you got me monologuing! - Syndrome
  65. I just went through this myself by elcid73 · · Score: 1
    I would have chosen DirecTv with Tivo, but my landlord would not have allowed me to put a dish up. So I'm stuck with analog cable and my awesome replayTV.

    My research shows that if cost is your concern, you should get a dish or directv system. If you are a new customer, you can get the DVR or Tivo for free, and you pay 5.95 or so per mo for the service. It is a great deal compared to what I pay now for standard cable.

    I'm in Central New York, and my cable provider is Time Warner. I also have Cable modem with them as well. I recive no discount for having both. I pay 42 for the CM, and 42 for the standard analog cable (under a 100 channels). For 34 per month, you can get a comprable digital package with the sat. companies. Add the 5 bucks or so for the DVR/Tivo service and maybe another 5 bucks for another reciever and you are just barely above what my cable company charges me for analog cable.

    In central New York, we have weather that is not very desirable. From what I hear of Sat. owners, it has not been a problem getting reception, although the installer who came to my house spend a half hour looking at trees and trying to predict where the trees will bloom in spring so that I could get a decent line of sight with the SW skies. Seemed really picky. (Of course, as I mentioned, I never got it installed, so I don't how it would have worked)

  66. Directv by ViceClown · · Score: 1

    I've been a very satisfied directv customer for 2 years now. The signal has never gone out even in heavy snow. Customer service is very good and their web site allows you to change your programing on the fly. As well, the Directv Tivo ROCKS because it is an all digital signal AND has two tuners. HD is rolling out now and the HD tivo is going to be available shortly. Seriously, it's a great value and a great service, IMHO. Never had reception issues and I live in Philadelphia where we get plenty of snow!

    --
    Have a Happy.
  67. DTV by 1gkn1ght · · Score: 1

    I have had DirecTV for over 4 years and am verry happy with it. I also have a Tivo DTV receiver. I have not had any problems with either service (unless you have heavy cloud cover). I am able to record anything that I want from the dish (including PPV).

    For the price, I think dish is much better. I have 4 receivers in my house, the Tivo, and Direct Plus programming (NASA TV, Local Chans, everything but the movie chans) and I'm paying a tad under $50.

    --

    "Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they AREN'T after you."
  68. No cable! by Jeff+Hartmann · · Score: 1

    I live in Idaho so it doesn't rain that often here, but it has rained hard before and it does get windy. When I did have cable I had to have the Cable Guy come out at least 3 times (about once a month) to fix my cable because it was fuzzy. With the DirecTV I've had for about 2 years I have only had it have problems about 2 times and it only lasted about 15 minutes each time. (Bonus is I didn't need the "DirecTV Guy" come out to fix it) I'd go DirecTV again without a thought.

    I've also got a standalone Tivo and a Replay. I think I would prefer the DirecTivo over the standalone. The MPEG from the reciever is saved right to the HD instead of being reencoded, so it saves space and gives a better picture. Also I don't like the IR Blaster method of changing the channels and the Guide data in the standalone doesn't include the PPV channels. Using a serial connection (which is how my Replay is setup) actually works well, but still the same guide problems.

    I just wish I could pick which channels I got, as I only really watch Discovery, Sci-Fi and I'd watch a few of the network stations if I could get them here.

  69. I Have Comcast by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

    The local provider has changed hands too many times to count. Time/Warner was okay. MediaOne was Okay. AT&T was terrible -- so bad it renewed my vow to never go with their services in ANYTHING again. It was so bad, I was planning on moving to satellite as soon as I had time to deal with it (and change my Internet, but even though I'm in Richmond, the capital of VA, I can't get DSL in my neighborhood from the local phone companies -- only Covad).

    Comcast and AT&T Cable merged and, basically, Comcast took over. I noticed a difference soon. Whereas AT&T seemed to push giving us as little as possible, Comcast seems to do more (that's why the stories about limits on "unlimited use" surprised me). Comcast offers video on demand --- not just for Pay-Per-View. I've watched most of "Jeremiah" through on demand. I like picking a movie and watching it when I want, instead of when HBO or Showtime schedules it. (I also like being able to sit down whenever I want and having a choice of something like 8 Monty Python eps to watch!)

    While Comcast may not offer DVR yet (they're promising them in our area soon), my experience is that when Comcast starts adertising, the service isn't far behind. Their techs seem to know what they're doing and phone support is pretty good (and I know Comcast treats the employees much better than AT&T did). (AT&T is so bad, some cities passed resolutions and were about to yank their franshise rights unless AT&T fixed things!)

    One last note about Comcast: Richmond got cable in 1985 (or so) and had a local call center for billing and tech support from the beginning. AT&T came in and suddenly my calls went to Newfoundland -- not even on the same continent! Comcast came in and one of the first things they did was bring back the local call center for billing. I still get Toronto or Newfoundland for tech support, but I can get local help on billing and other questions.

    I'm sorry that I have no experience with any kind of dish, so I can't speak to that, but my brother in law said when he used a dish (forgot if it was DishTV or DirecTV), he hardly ever lost the picture.

    1. Re:I Have Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got Richmond Comcast too but the quality sucks! It's clear they've put far too much signal on their lines or aren't using a good compression algorithm. I regularly get "drop outs" on digital cable stations and on the HDTV stations. Add in the incredible rate hikes over the last year and I'm dropping cable for satellite ASAP.

    2. Re:I Have Comcast by Fjord · · Score: 1

      Are you in Jacksonville or did this also happen elsewhere?

      --
      -no broken link
    3. Re:I Have Comcast by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      Richmond, VA.

      Did you have problems with AT&T before they merged, too? Or are you referring to another part of the post?

      Wasn't Jacksonville one of the cities that was close to terminating their franchise rights?

    4. Re:I Have Comcast by Misch · · Score: 1

      AT&T came in and suddenly my calls went to Newfoundland -- not even on the same continent!

      I was going to say with education like that you would have to be from Georgia. Newfoundland is very much on the same continent as Virginia.

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    5. Re:I Have Comcast by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's an island.

      I'm picky. I count a continent as a landmass that is connected. If you check a map, Newfoundland is not connected (by land) to the rest of Canada.

      If you want to say a continent includes the island around it, then Newfoundland is part of the same continent. If you're going to use that reasoning, then how far away and how big does an island have to be before it isn't part of a continent? Is Iceland part of any continent? How about New Zealand and Tasmania? Or Malaysia or Indonesia? Are these all part of the continents they are near? Or are they islands? Where do you make the distinction?

      For me, Newfoundland has no land connections, so I don't count it as part of a continent. Maybe I'm picky, but when I used to teach school, that's what the text books I used stated. (Although I have to admit they were published by the same company who published science texts saying there are only 3 states of matter.)

    6. Re:I Have Comcast by Fjord · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we did terminate their rights and put in comcast. It's funny, because we had the same lineup of cable companies, though: TW-Roadrunner, then MediaOne, then AT+T, and now Comcast. It's pretty coincidental.

      --
      -no broken link
  70. DirectTV and DTivo by John+Fulmer · · Score: 1

    Since I moved to the boondocks a year ago, and no cable available, I recently signed up for DirectTV and got a DTivo unit ($75 installed with a one year contract).

    Overall, I'm quite pleased. Satellite is NOT the same quality as normal (analog) cable, and I can see a difference between the two (then again, I do a lot of video editing, so MPEG artifacts are very obvious to me), but the image quality is quite watchable on my 26" TV at close range. Note that most cable companies are moving/have moved to 'digital cable' as well, which should be comparable image quality to DirectTV.

    What I'm REALLY happy with is the DirectTivo unit. I got the Phillips DSR 7000 model, which is a Series 2 model, and I'm overjoyed with it. Does everything it's supposed to, is very hackable, and once you enable the USB ports, for $20 you can get a decent ethernet adaptor for it.

    As far as losing picture, I've only lost it once, and that was for an hour during an ice storm which was covering the dish with ice. It cleared up on it's own, however.

  71. DirecTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in one of the most notorious bad-weather spots in the U.S., Seattle, and I have DirecTV. I hardly ever notice any problems with the signal, and compared to Comcast I'm getting one heck of a deal for cable in my area. Right now, thanks to some specials, I'm only paying around $35 a month or so for full cable (w/ local channels) and about 8 HBO channels. Once the promotion ends I'll be paying around $50/mo. which is still about $15 less than what Comcast charges a month.

    That added with the fact that you can get a TiVo receiver along with your DirecTV for something like $4 extra a month (this is what DirecTV told me when I asked them about it) makes the decision a no-brainer in my mind. If your only reservation about getting DirecTV is the signal, fuhgettaboutit and sign up. You'll thank me later.

  72. Just a data point by kvigor · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've had satellite service for about five years. I get one or two outages a year due to heavy snowfall. These are easily resolved with the high-tech dish-snow-removal tool (the Mk.I broom duct-taped to a pipe). No other weather-related outages ever.

    Judging from neighbourhood heresay, this is orders of magnitude more reliable than Comcast's cable service (I'm in Salt Lake City).

  73. DirecTiVo is the only way to go by KenCrandall · · Score: 1

    I've had plain DirecTV, Comcast digital cable, Comcast digital cable + TiVo, DirecTV + TiVo, and now an integrated DirecTV + TiVo (Sometimes called "DirecTiVo"). I have to say that nothing/ out there compares to having the TiVo and the DirecTV receiver combined.

    We had Comcast digital cable for 1 yr, as it was "free" when we moved into our new house. It was a horrible experience for us. The quality was terrible, the UI was slow as hell (even when compared to satellite recievers). It was always going down, and there was noticable blockiness in their MPEG-2 streams even for HBO and other pay channels (meaning they chose low-bitrate streams.) They even have the gall to run "TV Guide" adverts in the UI -- FOR SOMETHING THAT I ALREADY PAY FOR. Captive-audience advertising is easily in my top-10 pet peeves, and that alone would have been enough to make us switch, had the quality not sucked.

    Before Comcast, we had DirecTV for 3 years, in two states (NC and CA). Their service has always been wonderful, and I have always liked the thought of being able to comparison-shop for my equipment (you lucky people in Europe with your DBS standards!) We went back to DirecTV once we realized what we had been missing.

    TiVo (I only have limited experience with other PVR's, but I consider TiVo to truly be different than PVR -- think PVR++) completely changes the way you watch TV. Other than watching live sports broadcasts (ice hockey, mostly) my wife and I watch TV when we want it, often even waiting 1 hour until it's completely recorded, just so we can skip the commercials.

    Overall, I'd recommend DirecTV w/ integrated TiVo (they're cheap now) if you watch a lot of TV, and just a plain DirecTV system (they're even cheaper) if you just watch TV occasionally.

    Cheers,
    Ken

  74. Comcast by Edax+Rarem · · Score: 1
    I am a comcast subscriber (Cable TV and Internet) and I am pretty happy with them.

    Good points:

    • Thier service is only rarely flaky.
    • I run the cable through my VCR, so I don't have/need a "box."
    • I can watch different channels on every TV in the house. Not sure if satelite can do this or not.
    • They have their channels grouped. All the News, music, movie channels are together. I think this is very handy.


    Bad points:
    • They have cables above ground in my back yard. I fear tripping over them and killing my neighborhood's connection. (Maybe this is a good thing?)
    • Expensive, but what isn't?

      That is about it.

    --
    I hate my sig.
  75. I have Dish Network by Dr_LHA · · Score: 1

    I've had Dish Network for about 7 months now, after to moving to a part of the world where the local cable company doesn't carry Fox Sports World (which is essential for my fix of English Premiership Football). Before then I had Cox Cable, with a Digital box.

    One advantage is surely the fact that all channels are digital. This is a trade off given that a good analogue signal is better, but my cable company could never feed me a decent analogue signal, it was always snowy on at least a few channels.

    I have never noticed any signal reception problems, even in rain. I'm not saying rain fade isn't real - but I think in these days of digital signals its less of an issue. One caveat is that I live somewhere where the weather is fairly nice (California).

    The dish network PVR "does the job", but is nowhere near as good as Tivo. The one I have (508) has absolutely no conflict management for example, and can only record shows based on timeslot, not name. However it's still revolutionised the way I watch TV.

    One down side to satellite is that alot of the cable stations are East coast only, like Comedy Central for example.

    I went with Dish BTW because the place I rent already had a Dish Network dish on the roof when I moved in.

  76. Only Really BAD weather by RobertNotBob · · Score: 1
    I have had both major prviders and the only interruptions I have had over that last 4 years are a total of 5 times. 3 were due to very major thunder storms (including 1 hurricane) and 2 were from snow totally covering the dish (90 seconds with a broom and all was good)

    In case you are wondering, I started out with DISH (because it was slightly cheaper), but after a year my wife made me switch to DirecTV so that she could get NFL Sunday Ticket.

    Now, with a disk on each corner where the roof slope meets the outside wall, my garage looks like Mickey-Mouse.

    --
    ___ I don't respond to Anonymous Cowards, and I Never Mod them UP.
  77. As good as cable but.... by rueger · · Score: 1

    We had DirecTV while in Virginia, and Bell ExpressVu up here in Canada. In broad terms there really is no difference - lots of channels with nothing worth watching.

    If you have very specific needs, study the channel lineups from each provider to make sure that you're not missing something. Also, if you feel a need for local channels, you may be limited to cable.

    Yes, in heavy snow or rain you can lose the satelite signal, but then I've never had a cable provider that didn't also lose service from time to time. Try to mount your dish where it can be reached with a broom if you live in a snow prone region.

    Two more thoughts:

    If you move frequently it is easy to pull down and re-install a dish at your new house. Sat coordinates can be found in a number of places on-line.

    My other suggestion, recently implemented here, is to take only the basic cable or Satellite service, and instead sign up for netflix or a similar DVD service. You'll get better selection than satellite or cable for movies, plus you're able to rent most popular series as a package and avoid the hassle of trying to see them when they air on the networks.

  78. Recently switched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Switched from Cable to DirecTV back in Aug 2003. Picture is a little better (not THAT much, but noticeable). Content is about the same, but I'll give DirecTV the win as there are a handful of channels.
    Live in Upstate New York, and this has been one good winter so far - Nary a problem w/ the reception.

  79. emergency backup by duffbeer703 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Go outside and take in the sunshine. Read a book.

    If you are so dependent on TV that you need an "emergency backup", you have problems indeed.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:emergency backup by koreth · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone who's never had friends over to watch the Super Bowl.

    2. Re:emergency backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not a real Simpson's fan, are you? ;)

    3. Re:emergency backup by gryphokk · · Score: 1

      Every wise Oklahoman has an emeregency back-up TV in their basement or other spider-hole. Ususally a B&W 5" -- battery powered is a must. How else will we know when Gary, Mike or Rick says we can come out? (I'm not comin' out 'till after Gary does!)

      But backup-cable TV? Forget it; an piss-ant F2 tornado will take out your cable for a week! If your roof holds, your dish prolly will too.

      --
      And you, madam, are very ugly. In the morning, I shall be sober.
    4. Re:emergency backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't they have televisions?
      Is the Super Bowl required to bribe your so-called friends to spend time with you?
      Are you afraid you wouldn't be invited if you didn't host the party yourself?

    5. Re:emergency backup by Radius9 · · Score: 4, Informative

      He said he has the backup because he has a cable modem. If you have a cable modem, you'll still get analog cable if its offered in your area, regardless of what the cable company may tell you.

    6. Re:emergency backup by kvandivo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      duffbeer703 says:

      >Go outside and take in the sunshine. Read a book.

      >If you are so dependent on TV that you need an "emergency backup", you have problems indeed.

      Says a person who's nickname is an imaginary beer from an animated series on television.

      --
      http://www.WinWithRealEstate.com/
    7. Re:emergency backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not funny. This is the very definition of a troll post.

    8. Re:emergency backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in Massachusetts. There is no sunshine this time of year. There is only snowbanks dirt and salt. :(

      Honey, where's my black-market zoloft?

    9. Re:emergency backup by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Funny

      no it get's scary when they buy the equipment to have hot-failover of the signal. Yes it exists, I saw it.

      A customer that had way too much money I was helping a friend install the home automation system, he had sattelite that would failover to cable when signal was lost and then failed over to the hi-gain antennas on the tv tower he had installed. We talked him out of getting a C band 10 foot dish for further backup.

      the guy had 2 tv's in every room, including the bathroom and had to have them on...

      How do wierdows like that get the cash to live the whacked lifestyle?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:emergency backup by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      Incredible.

      You'd think that one would like to go to the bathroom and take a dump in peace

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    11. Re:emergency backup by EulerX07 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "If you have a cable modem, you'll still get analog cable if its offered in your area, regardless of what the cable company may tell you."

      That's quite untrue. I've worked for 3 years for Tech Support for Videotron in Montreal. When we sent techs to install cable internet at a location with no cable TV, we'd make a note for them to install a high pass filter with a cut-off that takes the analog cable frequencies out.

      There's also plenty of posts in this thread about cable internet being reliable. My experience (6000+ tech support calls when I was there) is that a reliable cable modem with good RX/TX levels and S/N ratio is rock steady. I could poll the modems to get their signal ration from our support apps to check them. If a problem exist in the transmission levels, you send a tech over to find the problem and fix it.

      Of course, there's no cure for people putting crap-tastic splitters (especially non-bidirectional) and ruining their transmission. Double that if the client keeps removing it when the tech comes over to check and puts it back on when he leaves. "The tech said the reception was ok! Waahhh!"

    12. Re:emergency backup by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Hey, the superbowl is a great time to go out to eat. As long as the place doesn't have a big-screen TV, you have the place to yourself.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    13. Re:emergency backup by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    14. Re:emergency backup by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      I'll have to add that to my list of "You know it's going to be a bad day." bits.

      You know it's going to be a bad day when:

      • Your sister forgets your birthday. And she is your twin.
      • You wake up and reach for your clothes from the night before, and there aren't any.
      • You wake up and the radio is announcing escape routes from the city.
      • You are tuning in to your backup TV set for the all clear signal.
      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    15. Re:emergency backup by yamcha666 · · Score: 1
      install a high pass filter with a cut-off that takes the analog cable frequencies out.

      Speaking of those filters, I had a friend who worked for Comcast when it was AT&T in my area. Before the filters, one could get basic cable, like my friend did. Then when they installed the filters, he climbed up the pole late one night, removed the filter, drilled out all it's special material to filter the signal, and placed it back in the line. Free basic cable again.

      But since he used to work for Comcast, I guess he knew what he was doing.

    16. Re:emergency backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      install a high pass filter with a cut-off that takes the analog cable frequencies out

      ummm, you mean that little box that I replaced with a high quality $18 filterless splitter? So THAT's why we still get cable... ;-)

      Don't worry, though, because even with 80+ channels there's STILL nothing on (oh, occasionally shows like Carnivale, or a decent movie now an' den, eh)--so we don't really watch it. That makes it okay, right?

    17. Re:emergency backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      . Then when they installed the filters, he climbed up the pole late one night, removed the filter, drilled out all it's special material to filter the signal, and placed it back in the line

      thats an odd way to do it, because where I am they still do line checks now and then and will inspect those. a better solution is to boil it in hot water - it causes the filter to because a passthrough so you still get free cable, and to the naked eye, it looks like its fine

    18. Re:emergency backup by EulerX07 · · Score: 1

      That's exactly the filter. The ones we installed were engineered to required a special tool for installation/removal and had a metal casing. I've never worked on them but I'd spoken to a few road techs about it.

      A lot of times a tech would go on the road to fix a problem with a client, and they're able to check what services the neighbor are supposed to have (or they could just call in to know). If you removed the filter, you were commiting fraud and could be prosecuted as such. At the time though the lawyers weren't set on "kill" mode so they'd just offer the client the opportunity so subscribe to cable tv instead of being sued and prosecuted in a criminal court.

  80. DirecTV w/ TiVo advantage by jea6 · · Score: 3, Informative

    One BIG advantage that DirecTV w/TiVo has is the ability to record two shows at once.

    Can the Direct TV Digital Satellite Recorder with TiVo record two shows at once?

    Yes, the Direct TV Digital Satellite Recorder can record two shows at once. In fact, it can even record two shows while you watch a third, previously recorded show. To take full advantage of this feature, you'll need to ensure that two (2) satellite inputs from a dual-LNB Direct TV System dish antenna are connected to the Direct TV Digital Satellite Recorder.


    http://www.free-satellitetv.net/direct%20tv_tivo_F AQ.htm

    Can't do this with regular TiVo.

    --

    sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    1. Re:DirecTV w/ TiVo advantage by EricWright · · Score: 2, Informative

      However, you can do this with my Time/Warner PVR. In my area, Time/Warner doles out Scientific Atlanta Explorer 8000 PVRs to thier customers ($6/mo more than a digital cable box). It has 2 tuners built into the box, so it only requires a single cable connection. This also means you can do PiP on a TV that doesn't normally have that capability!

    2. Re:DirecTV w/ TiVo advantage by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Is the TW PVR any good? I've never used one, but I heard they sux. Also, do you need digital cable to use one?

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:DirecTV w/ TiVo advantage by EricWright · · Score: 1

      The SA Explorer 8000 is a two tuner digital cable receiver with built in PVR. I have to pay $10/mo for digital cable and an additional $6/mo for the PVR. BTW, this is with TWC-NC.

      Overall, I think it's an average machine. It's no TiVo. You don't own the box, so a) don't think about hacking it and b) because of a), there is precious little information out there. The interface ranges from ok to dog slow, and changing the channel is rather slow. Since it is always recording, changing the channel involves closing the current write buffer, tuning to another channel, and opening a new write buffer. For some reason, this is much slower than you might think. Instead of channel surfing, you learn to surf the onscreen guide, selecting an interesting channel when you find one.

      I have heard a lot of people whine that their box would occassionally dump all recorded shows. Well, after 4 months, that finally happened to me about a week ago. There wasn't a whole lot on there I hadn't already seen, but it really pissed me off.

      Others have complained that their box would often decide not to start recording a show they had scheduled or manually asked to record. I have not had any such problems. Every show I have wanted to record has been done so successfully.

      On the other hand, you can schedule a show to be recorded on one channel or all channels; a particular time slot or any time; new episodes only, old episodes only, or both. If you see a show in the program guide you want to record, just press record and that one show is instantly scheduled to record. Since it has two tuners, you can record two shows at once. You can (obviously) watch one of those two shows, or watch a previously saved program. You've only got two tuners, so you cannot record two channels and watch a third... The machine also seems to detect instances where you are requesting a third channel (trying to record 3 things at once, or recording 2 shows and trying to watch a third) and warns you that you can screw up one or more of your recordings if you keep it up!

      Also, for those people who are turned off by the idea of the PVR "suggesting" shows for you to watch by recording them w/o permission, I haven't seen anything like that on this machine. There may be an option like that buried somewhere, but if there is, it surely isn't on by default.

      Lastly, there seems to be no way to get shows off the box. There is a front USB A connector, ostensibly for use with a USB keyboard. I've heard rumors that some of the SA Explorers have one or more firewire connectors in the back, which are totally inoperable at the present time. I've seen no official word from SA or TW regarding making those ports functional apart from a vague statement that they could be made functional with "a software upgrade". There is no ethernet/RJ-45 jack on the box anywhere. Also, unlike a TiVo, the SA gets its program information from the cable connection, so you don't need a phone line... Good thing given the lack of RJ-45/RJ-11 ports!

      All in all, for the price you pay ($0 up front, no contract terms, and $6/month), this isn't a bad deal.... but it's no TiVo.

    4. Re:DirecTV w/ TiVo advantage by Matt_Bennett · · Score: 2, Informative

      I got one of the Time Warner DVRs when Time Warner first offered them in Austin. It was a piece of crap. Crashed all the time, the "pause live TV" feature never really worked for me, the last straw was when it crashed, taking all my recorded programs with it. I took it back. I'm about to ditch Time Warner for DirectTV. For the price they charge, they just aren't worth it.

  81. Dish Networks w/PVR vs Charter Cable by jamonterrell · · Score: 1

    I have three complaints with Charter Cable which apply to most cable providers.
    1.) Outages. Too many of them, and too little explanation.
    2.) Customer Service. Always seemed annoyed to talk to you. Never appologized for an outage, never offered refund for extended outage, blantantly lie when you bring up their performance vs. Satellite performance. Seems to be a bigger problem than the customer service reps themselves, more like a "mindset" I've seen this with other cable providers too.
    3.) Digital Cable boxes. They are slow, takes FOREVER to see your ad-filled tv guide, and ever longer to change channels (They insist that Satellite is slower, even when told from first hand experience it isn't), and you CAN'T upgrade to a faster box to fix this even if you're willing to spend the money. You can't use them with TiVO to get your extra channels (can only get basic channels... diminishes the use of a PVR).

    I've been using Dish Networks' PVR for a few months now and I'm very pleased with it.
    The customer service is great, though I've only needed to call it once. The PVR and non-PVR boxes they GAVE me with my subscription (1yr contract) work great and change channels very quickly. Their TV Guide is ad-free and works great. Oh, and I can record shows on HBO which I coudln't do with Digital Cable+PVR.

    I'd rather use a coathanger as a TV antenna than go back to cable.
    --Jamon

    --
    I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
  82. Your choice by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I live here in Colorado. When cable was owned by TCI/ATT, we had an outage about 1-2 a year. It did not last for long. In contrast, since Comcast has bought it, we have monthly outages where they can last as long as several days. When I called for service, they said that they would have someone to look at it in a few days. The sad part is that there was no real weather problem. It was a clear day. When I complained, they suggested that I buy a business package for the network portion.

    Go with Satellite.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  83. DirecTV is the way to go by Artemus+Sol · · Score: 1

    I live in southern Illinois and the reception is great except in the most severe Midwest thunderstorms. The menu system is by far the best I've seen, with programming information up to 48 hours in advance and an in-menu tv screen. My friend has digital cable and he likes our DirecTV much better. I highly recommend it.

  84. Satellite was perfect when mounted on a swingset! by Drake42 · · Score: 1

    I installed my own dish, on a wooden swingset and it was fine. Once you find the satellite, a little wiggle / wind / rain isn't going to hurt anything. Cable people complaining about lost picture is pure and utter BS.

    Plus: DirecTV + 2 channel Tivo is gods gift to TV. Record one thing while watching another is fantastic. Cable Companies are lying pigs that will eventually go the way of the Dodo.

    And no, I do not work for any TV related company.

  85. MOD PARENT FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD PARENT UP FUNNY

  86. L33T Hax0rinG ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sat3Li773 iZ K00lz 4 L33t Hax0Ring!! Muhahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahha!!

  87. Big advantage...Guide by Lucarts · · Score: 1

    I currently have Comcast service (if you can call it that). If it weren't for the very high price and continuous increases it might actually be an ok service. At least in my area they have a decent channel selection and several are high-def. But in my opinion the worst part of Comcast's service (for digital cable) is the poor and totally inadequate guide. In my area you cannot browse backwards in time. >50% of the screen is given to advertisement and you can't see more than 30 min segments without limiting your view to one channel at a time. Add this to it frequently being wrong and not having data for 7pm on at noon the same day, (And it's the TVGuide guide) and you have a basically useless feature. I wish I could switch to satellite, the guide alone is enough for me, not to mention it's 20 bucks cheaper. Lucarts out.

    1. Re:Big advantage...Guide by SurfTheWorld · · Score: 1

      This could not be more true. The guide for Comcast cable (no matter where I go) is horrific. That sleezy gold background, with FF0000 on top of 0000FF brings me to tears - do they honestly believe that the brightest blue next to the brightest red is a *good* idea?!

      The usability is poor, the font looks like something I produced on Apple's Paint Shop Pro back in 1992, and the ads are annoying.

      Compare that to a TiVo or satellite guide, which often times features smoother more legible fonts, a transparent background (allowing you to view your current program while browsing the guide for other programs), allows you to go forward and back in time, features more than 5 channels per page, and supports page up and down - and I don't imagine why anyone would go with cable.

      --
      Do it for da shorties
  88. Go for Satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have DirecTV. Only had a signal loss 2 years ago, I've had t for 4 years now.
    Pluss even though, yes you have to buy the equipent for Satellite, get the tivo version, It costs the same, unless you get the HDTV version, and since you own it you can mod te hell out of if.
    My friend has Time Warner Cable, with a PVR, he's not alowed to mod it, since he doesn;t own, And he HAS to pay an extra $9 a month.

    You can pay a subcription service for the Satellite Tivo(or just buy the lifetime service), but you don't have to to use it.

  89. satellite tv vs cable by CRYPTOFREQ · · Score: 1

    As for satellite tv, take extra care to make sure your dish and its hardware are mounted extremely well so that a slight wind won't cause a loss of signal. As for storms and such, yes anything that causes a huge degredation of signal will of course cause the signal to drop off. Ever notice how cell phones degrade during a storm? same thing. As for cable tv, where do you think the cable companies get their signals? SATELLITE!!! Its only CABLE from their station to your house.

  90. Local Channels are better on Dish by ToughRat · · Score: 1

    I've been using Dish for a couple of years now, here in SW Florida, where it _really_ rains (2" in an hour is not uncommon in the Summer). The signal might go out for 5 minutes when the heaviest rain clouds intercept the satellite direction; I've noticed it maybe 5 times a year.

    What is really noticeable is the enhanced quality of the local channels (in most areas, Dish now offers a local channels option). The last 30-seconds of the Superbowl (all I watched of it) were incredibly clear, compared to Comcast, which I had for local channels until a few months ago.

    The one thing Dish doesn't have that Direc does (other than being owned, or about to be owned, by Rupert Murdoch, purveyor of censored news to China), is a baseball package, if you're into that.

  91. Satellite by savagedome · · Score: 1

    I switched to satellite (dishnetwork) after getting fed up and giving up on my local cable company.
    It took them more than 6 weeks to get the cable installation the first time. I moved out of my apt after the lease was over and decided to go with satellite. I've never had weather affect any quality.
    Also, the interactive TV guide turned out to be a blessing. Watching TV is so different when you can read about the show and also know what is coming up instead of just flipping through. (I know IO cable has the guide feature too.)
    My biggest plus was the instant PPV. I watch sports (not just regional) and you can order sitting there using your remote.
    The only problem I had with the satellite was that it lost the sound (you can see the picture on TV though). Turned out that all I needed to do was to switch off the damn thing and switch it on back again. (Talk about reboots!!)

  92. Mr. Pot? There's a Mr. Kettle on line 2. by jafo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comcast is running commercials about how easy it is to lose a satellite connection? I find that amusing because I just canceled my cablemodem net service because I was fed up with all the outages on it. We didn't have cable TV, so maybe that was never impacted when we had the problems, but I never found Comcast to be overly concerned about uptime.

    When we first got the cablemodem it was great. That was when it was Excite@Home. The first year we had no outages at all, it was rock solid. Then after AT&T bought it out, it was still ok, but IIRC we had an outage or two during the next year. The last 8 months of Comcast has just been horrible though.

    Anyway, I know you're not looking for cablemodem information. It's just that I choked on my lunch when I saw the thing about Comcast saying the satellite systems suffered from severe outages.

    The people I know with satellite don't complain about having problems, and haven't switched to other technology over the the years they've had them, so I'm wondering if it's really anywhere near that bad.

    Sean

  93. Cable TV and Tampa by Ashcrow · · Score: 1

    In Tampa we have Bright House Netowrks (a division of Time Warner) and I have to say service is bad. I generally have an outage once a week for Cable TV, and at least once a week on Road Runner (cable internet). While I know that having 3 hour downtime a week isn't horrible, it's anoying when it happens during your favorite programming, or when you really have nothing to do.

  94. Dish Network by ajohnj1 · · Score: 1

    I used to have Dish Network for about 2 years. I live in Iowa, and we can have some very fierce weather, only a few times has the signal gone out. When the signal did go out those few times, the disruption only lasted a few minutes. Recently I switched to cable (cableone) due to the fact that they gave me an insanely good deal to trade in my dish. I have broadband through cable, so I am getting a great price now. I really miss Dish Network though, as the reception on my cable is far from satellite quality. Even digital cable doesnt look as good for some reason. I don't get near as many choices in programming for the price I did with Dish. Speaking of signals going out, since I got cable several months ago, I have had more disruptions in service than I ever had on Dish Network in 2 years. I am really thinking about giving up the great deal I'm getting on cable to switch back to Dish Network. It is a great service that I highly recommend.

  95. DirecTV works for me, love the Tivo by looseBits · · Score: 1

    I've been very happy with DirecTV over Comcast cable. We have very few outtages (I can only recall 1 or 2 in the past year) and the picture doesn't break up as much as it seems to with digital cable. The DirecTV Tivo though is the deciding factor. For $100 + $5/mo you can get a 35 hour Tivo with 2 recievers from Hughes. This allows you to record 2 channels at the same time. Now, there are limitations to the DirecTV Tivo - it will not work with anything but DirecTV and it seems to be stuck at version 3.x (no Home Media Option).

    Also, a DirecTV HDTV Tivo is about to be released (for about $1000).

    --
    Lord, bless my users that they may stop being such fucking idiots!!
  96. We chose neither...but would have gone for DirecTV by potuncle · · Score: 1
    I was debating on getting either Comcast or DirecTV and between the two, the dish was a much better value. The dish and equiptment was free with a one year contract, so equiptment cost was not of concern.

    For the channels that my (live-in) girlfriend and I would want (Independent Film channel, Discovery, Bravo, Cartoon Network, etc...) the necessary package with Comcast was almost $60/month, when getting the same channels with DirectTV wound up being in their $32/month package.

    After some thought we decided that if we had either, we would watch much more TV than we really want to, so I went to Radio Shack and bought a good outdoor antenna and some cable (total cost $80). Now we get all the local channels (including MTV 2) with perfect reception.

    With the money I saved on the monthy fees, I built a MythTV box so we can have a variety of things to watch (without commercials) whenever we do want to watch TV.

  97. Re:Tech TV (OT) by Wakkow · · Score: 1

    When your son is older, think about a vacation out to San Francisco.. It's easy to get tickets to see the screensavers live and it's -very- fun to watch.

  98. DirecTV and such by pinchhazard · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've had DirecTV for years and it's great. I live out in the sticks in Washington State and the signal is great; it will get glitchy maybe twice a year during heavy storms. Also occasionally a bush or tree will grow in the dish's line of sight to the sky and has to be trimmed.

    I personally don't care for most dish systems (like DISH-on-Demand or whatever) and I really dislike digital cable. Some relatives in the city got digital cable and they seemed to like it, but every time I go over there it seems to be giving a poor signal, or the box takes forever to respond to the remote.

    I'd propose a 10-second test. If you can test drive your cable and satellite options at a store or friend's houses, push the "Info" button to try and retrieve program information (synopsis, review, rating information, cast, etc.) In my experience, good quality systems, whether dish or cable, will return the information under 10 seconds. Crappy systems will take 20, 30, 60 seconds, or will just hang and never return. Good luck!

    --
    Do you love freedom??? Do you love freedom!!! DO YOU LOVE FREEDOM!!!!!!!!
    1. Re:DirecTV and such by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      If you have a DirecTV system with APG (advanced program guide), such as the DirecTV DVR or the newer Samsung recievers, the guide info comes up *nearly instantly*. You also get 7-14 days of guide data, and you can move through the guide very quickly. Particularly on the Samsung recievers, the guide is very snappy.

  99. Cable by airrage · · Score: 1

    My only beef with my cable (I have digital-cable) is that changing the channels is quite slow. It seems that SAT is a little more snappy. Now this probably doesn't seem that earth-shattering but you used to be able to bump-bump-bump through channels real quickly and let the blended images burn your retinas until you found something that looked interesting. Which brings me to point #2:

    The guide. The menus with digital-cable using the remote provided me is quite lacking. Often, as you delve into your system to check options there is no Go-back-to-the-beginning button. So you end up repeating the three or four keystrokes to get from the main menu (of anything) to where you can branch into several options. Of course, this leads me to point #3:

    Uptime. I can almost guarantee that cable will not make it through a thunderstorm with winds in excess of 10MPH. It's just impossible. My cable did make it through a thunderstorm once, but I just assumed it was like an amputee who still feels the sensations from a limb long gone. This of course brings me to point #3:

    The cable guy. Installations and repair windows are scheduled over like a 3-day 24-hour period, and "we won't call before we come.". Naturally, they'll come at the most inconvient time.

    I really think satellite is the future, but cable's got the high-speed cable modem and that's a pretty big carrot ...

    Peace out.

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
  100. Forget Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Definitely go with the Satellite. Preferably Directv and get the DirecTivo setup. Two tuners so you can record two shows at a time or watch one while recording another. It will total change how you watch tv and the Directv service blows away anything cable has for the price plus the picture far exceeds even digital cable (at least in my area as I have tested both and have friends who still have cable).
    The only time you will experience signal problems is when there is a heavy downpour or bad thunderstorm, and then it is only for about 10 minutes at most, and if you have the Tivo you can watch something already recorded anyway.
    I have had more outages with cable when I used to have it then I even notice with satellite and when cable did go down (usually because of a downed utility pole or blown equipment at one of the feeds) it was down for at least an hour or more.

  101. comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had both DirecTV and cable (in Orlando, FL). While the satellite didn't go out at every drop of a hat, it did go out much more often than I'd like. In FL in the summer it rains pretty strongly almost every day, and the satellite *would* definitely cut off. Outside of the summer, it would go off maybe once every week or two. Outages ranged from 1 minute to several hours during bad storms. That said, I don't watch TV very often, and those were the times I noticed it going out, so who knows how often it went out when I wasn't watching.

    Storms, btw, were really the only thing that affected the reception. I never experienced any image or sound degradation - it would just cut out completely.

    I've switched to Time Warner (now Brighthouse) digital cable about 1.5 years ago, and haven't had the cable go out once. Though I also just recently upgraded to DVR service, and have noticed much more artifacting now than with my old digital box (but that's another story). I'm getting the DVR through my cable company because it's cheaper than any alternatives (aside from perhaps building my own linux pvr).

    I didn't notice any difference in picture or sound quality from satellite to cable. In terms of cost of basic packages, cable was a few bucks cheaper for me. I didn't really price compare the higher end satellite packages, but I think all-in-all they're pretty close.

    I think it all boils down to where you're at. The satellite going out was so annoying for me I had to switch to cable. The price was a small benefit, but worth it too (especially as satellite charges you extra for local stations). My recommendation: if you watch a lot of tv or go crazy when you lose reception, I'd go for cable. Aside from that, it would depend on what each company will offer you.

  102. Make sure your dish is properly installed by Lupulack · · Score: 1
    A buddy of mine was an installer for one of the Canadian digital satellite providers ( forget which one ) and I helped him on a few jobs

    The upshot is that the signal can be interrupted by lots of water. Heavy snowfalls in the air can drop your signal by a significant amount. Oddly enough , you can get good reception through a frickin' MOUNTAIN but not through a thick stand of trees.


    So if you get a reasonable installer to do the job he'll make sure you get a good solid connection which can stand a 30% drop in signal strength. So long as it doesn't drop below 40% of optimum ( or so , it was a long time ago ) you'll never notice a loss of quality.

    --
    The fact that no one understands you doesn't mean you're an artist.
  103. Dish network reception... by kary4th · · Score: 2, Informative

    After moving a few years ago, a "professional" Dish installer put up a new dish for me. I would lose signal in heavy rain. This had never happened to me before. I corrected the problem by A) adjusting the dish, so that it actually pointed at the satellites (One satellite dish - two satellites. It's a good thing), and B) replacing some corroded connectors. Never had a problem since (even in Rochester, NY snowstorms). And yeah - NASA is channel 213.

    --
    Don't trust anything that bleeds for a week and lives.
  104. Satellite Service now comes with free DVR's... by Caeda · · Score: 0

    Saw the add in the paper about 2 weeks ago. You get a free 3 room installation, 2 of which are DVR units so you can pause and replay. Didnt catch the fine print so don't know how good it is. :)

    --
    ~~ Please keep your arms, legs, and outright stupidity inside the ride at all times. Thank You ~~
  105. pleasant satellite experience by y2dt · · Score: 1

    I've had DirecTv for 3 yrs here in Massachusetts. I've only had 1 service outage in that time and it was for about 5 minutes during a crazy thunderstorm. I've never lost service due to snow or other weather events.

    dont let comcast screw you. my friends have them and I personally hate their digital program guide. Slow as molassas in the winter

  106. DTV-Replay TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I've had comcast in the past, what they don't want you to hear is the truth.....

    DTV is only out when we have *very* heavy snow or rain...wind dosen't seem to effect anyting for me. (In the Detroit Area)

    While on comcast I experenced outages monthly that lasted at least a day, and several that where hour long stints. I have to say that DTV (aside from being corporate bastards) has been a hell of alot more reliable than cable has ever been for me.

    The DVR really helps too....just incase of a big snow storm..heh.

    That's just my two cents.....

  107. DirecTV tuner box by dmoore · · Score: 1

    There is one aspect of this debate often overlooked: the quality of the tuner box. With digital cable, you'll often find that the tuner they rent you is a piece of crap. The built-in program guide is very sluggish to respond to commands and is usually riddled with little thumbnail ads.

    With DirecTV, I had a Hughes tuner box that was great. The program guide was very responsive. I could scroll through it quickly with no time lag between my remote presses. Also, it would put a small zoomed out view of the current channel in the corner, so I could still watch TV while looking through the guide. That's a very useful feature.

    Overall, I felt that the cable TV companies are trying to squeeze every last dollar out of you while keeping their own costs rock bottom. DirecTV on the other hand cares about the user experience of their service.

    Also, as far as the dish loosing signal during weather -- I've never had a problem. On the other hand, I installed the dish myself. I imagine the "professional installers" often don't point the dish very accurately.

  108. PVR's change the whole experience by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1
    I was a huge satellite fan, but found that once I had a PVR (MythTV), that all the shows I wanted to watch (in general) were on at some point in time, on cable. And a high quality PVR card and a good cable feed, is much better picture quality than a typical TV.

    Plus, for the cost of a second PVR card, you can watch one live show while recording another, or, more importantly, record two shows simultaneously on two channels. I saw "more importantly," since with a quality PVR, I find that one tends not to watch live TV at all.

    Personally, one PVR card seems to be enough for me, given the number of times that shows are repeated; there's only the odd time there are two shows on at the same time that wouldn't be repeated any time soon.

    Definitely a better way to watch TV; I watch more of what I want to watch, spending less time doing so. When you have a library of your favorite shows automatically accumulating, you tend not to watch something because "nothing else is on." Your standards rise, and you watch more quality, less quantity, of TV.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  109. Im sure its been said by windex82 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but I'm not gonna read through all the comments...

    Most cable providers will have the exact same problems in extreme weather as satellite has.
    The cable providers fail to mention that they get most/all of their feeds from satellite. A properly aligned dish will not go out unless under the most extreme weather, in which case the cable satellites are also having problems.

  110. directv and tivo by daemous · · Score: 1

    I had crap cable. It was crazy-expensive. We got
    less than 60 channels. Some stations came in
    fuzzy. And when it stormed, we often lost all
    signal. I had a cable modem. I also had a tuner
    card in my computer.

    Finally I was able to get DSL in my area. I got
    DSL, and Directv with Tivo. It's a beautiful
    thing. Even if I get all the pay channels, it's
    cheaper than my old shit cable company. It's more
    reliable. It works during blizzards. And the
    limited space of the tivo I selected isn't a
    bother, it's a help. If I want to preserve
    something, I run it to tape.

  111. Comcast experiences (in Denver area) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have digital cable (two boxes) with a few premium channel packages and no 'net connection. The total comes to ~$80/month which I do think is high but....oh well, what isn't. Anyway:

    Pros:
    - Pay per view ordering is a snap
    - If the digital side goes down due to a thunderstorm (and it will, trust me) I still have the standard coax with the 'extended basic' channels (no premium channels)
    - If the digital side dies while you're watching PPV, they're good about giving a refund (happened just this past summer)
    - Fairly good info listings for each channel

    Cons:
    - You're letting a brand new advertising resource into your home. Not only do they slap ads in with the info listings, but they'll queue up messages to let you know about all the stuff/crap they're offering in the coming weeks.
    - The fact that I don't have the premium channels if the digital side craps out
    - Some digital channels are actually worse than their coax counterparts. Sometimes a signal can get infrequently disrupted. No problem on the coax side, but the digital side suffers because it's dropping a frame and the decompression gets barfed up until a keyframe comes through.
    - Frequent updates and reboots to the digital unit. This just happened to me again and I didn't realize it. They had reset EVERYTHING, so the coax didn't work (there's an option for this) and the clock was OFF...I thought my cable had died and called their service (nice people, just clueless).

    So I guess what I'm saying is that everything they offer has two sides: you get more/better features, but you also get something tacked on that you won't want (mainly advertising). I don't know if it's the same case with satellite, but I'm very eager to move into a house and get a dish....can't be any worse.

  112. Cable picture quality _sucks_ by Dani+Filth · · Score: 1

    Compare satellite to cable and you'll see all the static, ghosts and other visual artifacts cable TV provides. There really is a noticable difference and satellite (DirecTV) provides a superior picture. Go with DirecTivo!

  113. Cable = bad by cb8100 · · Score: 1

    I've got Comcast cable and I hate it (I live in an apartment so a dish is not an option, unfortunately). It's terribly expensive and I don't get many channels. If I want to get the digital cable box (with no digital subscription) it's an extra $10 a month. So, I'd basically be paying $120 a year for the privillege of being able to order pay per view movies at $5 a pop.

    My parents have Direct TV (or DirecTV, whatever) and have no problems with it. They pay the same amount I do (about $45) and get about 100 more channels (around 160 total) and have two receivers (bedroom and living room). They also pay for Tivo service.

    My parents also live in a *very* windy valley (daily winds during the summer of 35mph with gusts up to 65mph) and have never lost their signal due to weather. The only time they've lost their signal was due to a programming error on behalf of Direct TV (one time in 3 years).

    --
    My lack of God, it's Trotsky!
  114. Already switched to dish by psychopenguin · · Score: 1

    I got sick and tired of my previous cable company jacking up the rates every 3-6 months. It was never by a lot, but over time I realized that suddenly I was paying more than $60 a month for the _basic_ digital package (no movie channels or anything). Worse, I thought about switching to standard (non-digital) cable but they priced it such that it was only like $5 difference.

    So, switched to dish network, now I'm getting pretty much the same channels, + PVR etc and I'm paying about $40. You'll probably want to make sure local channels are offered over the dish in your area. Usually it's just like an extra $5 or $7 and well worth it especially with the PVR. The weather can affect the signal in very extreme bad weather, but in my experience the cable usually went out under such conditions (and less) before too. I never thought that was a terribly effective FUD tactic on the part of cable companies.

  115. Dish Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live on the West Coast and one thing I was not informed about with Dish Network was that most of the channels I watch, sci-fi, tnt, tbs, etc... were on East Coast time. A real pain in the ass IMHO. The weather channel was the New York feed.

  116. NASA TV - free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just watch it on the Internet. Save yourself the $360-$600+ per year in costs. Throw the TV out with your smokes and your bingo cards.

  117. HDTV Satellite Tuner is the way to go... by kegger64 · · Score: 1

    DirecTV has several HD channels available, including ESPN, HBO, ShowTime, Discovery Channel, a couple of low rent movie channels, and a PPV. It's about $9 / month extra to get the HD.

    I got a Samsung HDTV tuner for my DirecTV system, which combines off-air HD channels, cable (if you've got it too) and standard local channels into one seamless guide. With it I can spend countly hours watching mindless programs without even realizing it.

    --
    653899 - Another prime Slashdot UID
  118. DirectTV vs Time Warner by lcde · · Score: 1

    In milwaukee I have Time Warner cable because our apartment doesnt allow satalite, and I have had nothing but problems with noise on the line. They have come out to fix it a few times but nothing seems to work. Seems at peak times the higher channels become blocky and sometime dont 'download' for a few seconds.

    OTOH, my DirectTV in chicago has only had a problem once and it was the biggest storm in chicago i had seen in awhile.

    I believe that cable also has satalites, its just not at your home, its at the recieving station. So if there is a big storm, or the watch dog at the cable companies broadcaster sneezes :D their satalites will go out also.

    --
    :%s/teh/the/g
  119. Rural or Urban? by phrostie · · Score: 1

    it makes a difference.
    Satellite TV has drawbacks. btw you forgot to list whiteout, too much sun light.
    but, if you are in a rural area many times cable is just as bad or worse. our neighborhood has cable but no one uses it because it is that bad.

  120. Television Rots Your mind by Scorchen · · Score: 0

    I honestly beleive that Television rots your mind. I remember one night I watched tv for about 2 hours because I wanted to see the highlights for a basketball game. During those two hours, they kept making me beleive that the highlights were next. Most of what I watched was pure advertisements. Then i realized that If i had just gone to nba.com and had to wait 2 hours for the page to load, I would have just gone to bed. Tv is worthless, and it rots your mind.

    --
    CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL!!
  121. Dish rocks by smammon · · Score: 1
    I've had DishNetwork since the local cable provider awnsered the question about when they would get the SciFi channel with "Oh - you're one of Them..."

    I've had the sat long enough (6 yrs methinks) that I'm grandfathered in for the distant network feeds. I love having both east and west timezones.

    As a new subscriber - look into the hassle you will need to go through for the network channels where you are moving. If it's in the boonies you may be able to get them off the dish. Otherwise you will also need an off the air antenna to get the networks. (The other trick is to tell them that one of your recievers is for your RV - Remember to vote out the wanker's that created this dumb-ass law!)

    BTW I have one of the high end dish PVR's (721) and it rocks!

    --
    "Smile, listen, agree, and then do whatever the fuck you wanted to do anyway." ~Robert Downey Jr.
  122. I wouldn't get satellite by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    It's at the mercy of the sky. There could be weather interfering with the signal. The electromagnetic interference from the sun we had a little while back no doubt interfered with satellite tv. The dish could be hit by lightning, hail or high wind. A tornado could move it for you but where it would end up is anybody's guess. You can't get local channels which is another thumbs down in my book. Aside from the equipment, you have to get a subscription to satellite channels. You might win a satellite system but you still have to purchase a subscription. And the people that contact you on the phone to tell you that you've won, won't tell you about that hidden cost.

    1. Re:I wouldn't get satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you stop taking your meds again?

  123. Comcast sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have comcast. They charge me for everything, I was spoiled on TimeWarner at my parents house gorwing up, but now in my apartment comcast is the only provider I can get. I have to have cable boxes for each TV (3 TV's * $5 for each box = $15 extra a month), monthly charges for the cable modem (extra $5 a month). I live in southern california so the people I do know that do have DirectTV have little or no complaints (except for the fact that some channels are on eastern time). I would just see how your cable company in the area you will be moving in will charge you.
    Timewarner didn't require me to have boxes attatched to each TV, or pay monthly for the cable modem. I enjoyed that service better since they were more upfront about the service.

    1. Re:Comcast sucks by fatcowtoes · · Score: 1

      I rarely post on here, but I go out of my way to harp on Comcast every chance I get. Their service is really, really terrible.

      I'm getting really pissed off about all these "Ditch the Dish" commercials they show, talking about how you lose signal when it rains or the wind blows or anything else. Truth of the matter is that I lose my cable signal everytime my neighbor checks his e-mail. Standard digital signals cut in and out, and the HDTV never works during the evenings or on weekends. They simply don't have enough bandwidth in my area to handle the demand. But since my deck faces northeast, I'm pretty much stuck with this crap until I move in August.

    2. Re:Comcast sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm at work, so I don't have time to set up a slashdot account yet, but I need to jump on the bandwagon by saying COMCAST SUCKS! My girlfriend and I tried to have cable and internet installed in early December. It took them two weeks (and three of my floating holidays) before they finally set everything up. The installer ended up coming to our apartment at 8:00 in the evening and complained the entire time about having to work so late.

      Two days later our internet cut out. It just so happened that, when he set everything up, he didn't actually confirm the installation, so our internet connection stopped.
      THEN, a week after that, they did an audit of our building to make sure nobody was getting free cable. What that meant was that they cracked open their service box outside and DISCONNECTED THE ENTIRE BUILDING! No phone calls, no documentation in the mail. Just a hang tag on the front door of the building saying what they had done.
      We decided to say to hell with television and just got DSL. We canceled our Comcast service and patiently awaited our refund.
      Last week my girlfriend called their customer service people and asked where our money was. They hadn't canceled our service!
      So there's my two cents. If Comcast is the only option you have, I'd go with getting a dish. Sure, rain could hamper the reception- but rain goes away; Comcast will, unfortunately, be here for a very long time.

  124. I wouldn't use a dish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I visited a cousin in Louisiana last summer. His dish gave out in even moderate rain showers. Picture and audio would be lost completely. On nice days though, audio/video quality were very good.

  125. get sattelitte... by josepha48 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    comcast, or as I like to call them now, comcrap, keeps raising our rates, every month. They do this so that they can charge less for their cable high speed internet users and for other services they offer. Services like sports, which I don't get or want. My bill now is 97.00 a month. Yes I get just about every channel (HBO, Showtime, Cinimax, TMC, Stars, etc) but I don't have the international stuff or the sports package. When I got service 4 years ago it was $50.00 a month.

    EVERYONE I have heard has said that they moved to satellite and have had none of the problems they mention on TV. The fact of the matter is that satellite is the future and newer technology. Cable is expensive as they have to lay all the cable. In a few more years the satellite dishes should get smaller as tech progresses. Just look at satellite radio (XM). The antenna for that is about 3 inches square. In 5 years or 10 years satellite tv will probably be able to do something a little larger or even that size that you don't have to mount or point in any direction.

    I have seen satellite antennas get smaller. They used to be 10 feet across and now they are 18 inches and shrinking. My cable box has not changed in 4 years.

    GO FOR SATELLITE, cable blinks out and on too.

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

    1. Re:get sattelitte... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      97 bucks? No shit? On the DISH I can get the Everything Pak for 74.99.

  126. DirecTiVo rocks... by PinchDuck · · Score: 1

    It's been a tough winter, with lots of snow, but there has been no problem with my reception. And the convenience of TiVo was totally worth it. Beats the hell out of cable, at least in my area.

    1. Re:DirecTiVo rocks... by ad0gg · · Score: 1

      I totally agree, directivo is much better than cable + tivo. It can record two streams at once while you watch a recorded show. It saves the raw MPEG stream so it doesnt' need an encoder which means directv is giving them away. Only thing I wish it had was Picture in Picture like the Microsoft Ultimate TV. My girlfriend has adelphia cable since she lives in condo without a southern exposure. On their digital cable package, they use pop up adds when you change the channel and 1/3 of the guide screen is reserved for ads. Its an insult since you paying extra digital cable for them to advertise on your tv. The myth about satellite tv going out in bad weather is pure bullshit, my girlfriends cable goes out when it poors down rain( though not that often since I live in LA), I'd assume its flooding something and causing a short. And funny thing is my satellite reception is still perfect. I even called up cable company and told them that her cable was out, and that my dish was still working. The CSR said "I know. Thats why I have a dish too". Only time cable is worth while is if there is overbuilder cable company serving your area. There was study showing that rates where 25% or higher cheaper than if the cable company had no competition.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    2. Re:DirecTiVo rocks... by solfood · · Score: 1

      Directivo DOES rock. I have a couple of Series 1s networked and a series two in the living room. I'd get more of the 2s if they'd just work with an HU card. Free PPV and Porn rule.

  127. DISH Network in Montana... by Hallowed · · Score: 1

    I have DISH in southern montana, and it is great. The picture quality and sound are great, and the only time the signal drops is when you have a few inches of heavy wet snow on the dish or there is a moose standing in front of it. I put my dish on a post in the ground almost under a big spruce tree, which shields it from the snow, but leaves you vulnerable to moose interference.

    --

    1. When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is no longer your friend.

    2. Do not eat iPod shuffle.

  128. Not on Saturdays... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 0

    I refer you to my earlier post on Slashdot Hate Days.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  129. Direct TV -- Bad experience by virgil2795 · · Score: 1

    I had Direct TV for two years. I had so many problems with it I lost count. I had 4 different installers come out to look at the issue. They replaced the cable, the LNB, everything but the recievers. I would come home to find 'black screen' for shows I TIVO'd. Very unhappy. Perhaps it was my location(this was Alamo Square in San Francisco). When I moved(still in San Francisco), I switched to COMCAST digital cable. The cost is about the same, and they offer almost as many channels as Direct TV does now(they DO have TechTV, but that is in SF, check the channel line up in your area). I had a bad experience with them as well though. Right after installation, they did an 'upgrade' in my neighborhood. So I had horrible service for a good 6 weeks. I called COMCAST and had them take that off my bill. My only remaining issue is 'ghosting' on local channels. I plan on 'fixing' that by getting HDTV from COMCAST. So I guess the best advice is to inquire about service in your particular area. Don't take someone's word for it that DIRECT TV is great...they most likely live in a different area, with different conditions. Or...just Kill your Television.

    --
    "I'm making gravy without the lumps baby!" -- Mad Bomber Which Bombs at Midnight -- The Tick
  130. directv beats cable hands down... by ikeee · · Score: 1

    I was a cable customer (TCI, ATT, COMCAST) for three years and after switching to directv I can easily say that the quality of the picture, service, user interface on satellite are much better than cable. In 2 years that I've had satellite, I've had no more than 1 hour of interruption. And I should add that I live in seattle, which means rain, rain rain and more rain on top of cloud covered skys. The user interface is much faster than cable and better organized. Especially tivo option with directv is the best investment you can make.

  131. Outtages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My family has had satillite tv for years now, starting with the now swollowed up primestar and now using dishnetwork. The only time it ever lost signal is if we had a very intense thunderstorm. Once the storm died down a bit the connection would be good as new. And from our experience it's always been cheaper than the local cable.

  132. Dish is OK by me by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
    I live in the upper Midwest (northeast Nebraska) and have a Dish Network DVR. My thoughts:
    • I haven't used a TiVo, so I can't directly compare the DVR. However, instead of recording a specific program, you set timers for a specific time slot, just as you would on a VCR. If a show you normally watch gets rescheduled, then the DVR will cheerfully record whatever happens to be on that channel at the normal time. If the show is extended for some reason (a special one-hour episode of a 30-minute sitcom, for example), then you'll only get the part broadcast during the normally scheduled time. Still, it works great, is a snap to use, and I otherwise absolutely love it.
    • If you have kids, being able to pause live TV is the difference between being able to take a break to change a diaper and missing part of the show. I will not go back to not having a pause button. Just won't do it. I love that more than any other feature.
    • We get lots of snow and thunderstorms. I have lost signal exactly twice in 18 months, each time due to a massively powerful supercell. I've never lost signal due to rain, ice, wind, or any of the other FUD reasons that the cable guys overhype. On the one hand, it's bad to lose reception when you most want it, i.e. when you're trying to decide whether to go into the tornado shelter. On the other hand, if conditions are so bad that we lose reception, then we need to be in the tornado shelter anyway. Besides, our cruddy cable got water into the system during a few torrential downpours, so we would've lost cable during those times anyway.

    In short, other than the fact that we live in a small town and don't get local TV over the dish (although we expect to soon), I can't think of a single thing I miss from our cable days. The service is cheaper, the picture quality is better, the DVR rocks, and the reception is excellent. I won't be switching back.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:Dish is OK by me by vrmlguy · · Score: 1
      One bit of advice: if you have any interest, sign up now for a network feed in a different timezone. Here's why.

      If you don't have your local TV via dish, you can get access to a package of either NY or LA network stations. Once your local TV is available, you can't sign up anymore, but your existing package is grandfathered. This gives you twice as many chances to view/tape a network program, which can be handy at times.

      My city didn't have a UPN affiliate, so I qualified for a package with 3 WB and 2 UPN stations. The WB's are in NY, Denver and LA while the UPNs are in Boston and NY (both EST, which is a bummer), so my one-receiver DVR could, for instance, record Enterprise and Jake 2.0 from Boston, then get Angel from Denver, and then Smallville from LA. This makes all members of my family happy. OTOH, if '24' conflicts with something on ABC, CBS, or NBC, I'm screwed.

      So, if you have a DVR and can justify an extra $5 or $10 a month, get those packages now while you can, and keep them once you can get your local TV. I predict that you'll be glad you did.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    2. Re:Dish is OK by me by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      One bit of advice: if you have any interest, sign up now for a network feed in a different timezone.

      Good advice, but be aware that you may not be allowed to get the networks you want over the dish. I live equidistant to Omaha, NE and Sioux City, IA. Although I'm in Nebraska, the FCC considers my city to be in the Sioux City viewing area. Because of this, I can only get local stations over my dish if they're from Sioux City, even though no SC channels are available over the dish and all Omaha channels are. Worse, since I can technically receive NBC and CBS via antenna (no matter that the picture quality is abyssmal), the FCC won't allow me to "buy" those networks from other cities (although I can (and do) buy FOX and ABC out of Dallas).

      Dish Network has an online list of cities where local coverage is available. If you live in one of these cities, then you can get all of your channels via satellite. If you're not, then you may be able to buy some or all of the channels from other cities.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  133. DirecTV in Florida by aml666 · · Score: 1

    I've had DirecTV for two years. The signal was always great even in light storms (Florida). Heavy thunderstorms have killed the signal on a few occasions... most of those times the power failed soon after anyway.

    One problem I did have was: after a very windy storm, the dish moved slightly. The DirecTV people wanted $80 to re-align the dish. I had a "talk" with their Customer Retention department and they fixed it for free.

    --
    www.thejulingtoncreekplantaion.com
  134. DirecTV in the mountains by 33nine3 · · Score: 0

    I live in a remote area where DirecTV is the only option. The only time I've noted transmission problems is when snow accumulates on the dish. When it's snowing hard, I have to go out and sweep the dish off every now and then, so if you're living in an area where it snows, make sure the dish is somewhere you can easily hit it with a broom.

  135. Satellite vs. Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had both Rogers cable and ExpressVu satellite in Toronto. Neither is a perfect transmission system. Both have about an equal amount of "downtime," since cable goes out now and again for extended periods. Cable has ghosting, noise; satellite has compression artifacts (try watching Nip/Tuck sometime, or, as has been metioned, ST:TNG on Spike). IMO, it's six of one...

  136. Cable sucks. Satellite Rocks. by Delusional · · Score: 1
    "Basic" cable in my area (through Comcast) starts at $40-something. For about $35 I get about 25 Spanish language channels (my wife is Peruvian) and 40 English-language channels (including NASA) with locals from Dish Network. Packages start at $25-ish and you can get about everything under the sun for $75 or so. They offer a DVR setup, free with x-month contract last time I checked. HDTV is a *lot* more, but there seems to be very limited content available for now anyway...

    Picture is awesome, about one artifact a month and no lost signals yet (even during a three-day ice storm).

    Just be sure to read the fine print on any special offers first, they're generally decent but (like all good capitalist companies lately) do try to get hidden fees and commitments past you if you're not careful.

  137. Direct Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK having tried all three major sat providers and living for years with cable go for Direct Tivo.

    Cable quality is bad and getting worse on the nice analog side. It's digital cable that I have viewed looks worse than directtv about the same as dish.

    Dish network the quality of there encodes are just bad dont subject yourself to this on anything over 20 inches.

    Zoom it looks ok just now trying it out the HD is stunning but I havent looked at others HD not Zooms SD programming.

    DirectTV best looking for the sat crowd if it's a popular channel (they vary bandwith by channel) Direct TV is an option that makes Tivo go downgrading picture quality to no difference this was the big issue with me and tivo is big screen viewing untill directtivo that is.

    As to the rain fade drop outs etc it's all relitive. I had one house that I have to attach a pole to the roof to get a good view of the sats (no tree's in the way) wet leaves kill reception period. Snow can be an issue as well. My current house I have the dish on the south side on a porch roof with an onobstructed view that happens to be next to a window that would allow me to remove snow if nessicary.

    I have had less problems with DirecTV than cable but my local company stinks. If you can wait and want HD or just a lot of SD programming time the HD Tivos ship in a few months I think it's 700 with a 250 gig drivethat has 4 tuners 2 direcTV and 2 HD terestrial and is suppsoed to be able to record 3 and play back one.

  138. My experince: cable has the crappy picture. by Thag · · Score: 1

    At least where I lived in the Philly suburbs, Comcast digital cable had an abysmal signal. It was constantly breaking up, dropping frames, etc. I worked for a while at a video equipment manufacturer, and the techs used to use the local cable signal as a demo for their signal metering equipment, because it was really obvious something was wrong, and the equipment would show it. It really was the suxxor.

    When I had Dish Network, on the other hand, the signal was great.

    Now I have RCN cable, and the signal is good there too.

    So, in summary, Comcast makes the Baby Jesus cry.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  139. DirecTV versus AT&T (now Comcast) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,

    I have been a subscriber for a couple of years to DirecTV and before that I was a subscriber to AT&T. AT&T was okay, but its quality was just not that great and its downtime was relatively often and for lengthy periods of times. With DirecTV I can usually go for long periods of times without satellite interruptions, though sever electrical storms do cause problems for the signal (rain doesn't seem to bother it, unless it is sleeting). I have had a lot of problems with the equipment DirecTV sent us (multiple receivers are rather buggy).

    All in all, I plan on staying with DirecTV, but the choice is not so clear cut either way as people might lead you to believe.

  140. DTV&DISH good... DTiVo better by stripes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have had DTV for about 3 years (in two different houses). I have only had a (noticeable) signal loss from rain twice (I think), and I've had more signal loss from snow it seems to be only very short periods of time (I don't lose an hour show, I have 5 seconds of screwed up video and the audio is OK...or maybe I lose video for two minutes and audio for 90 seconds). My DTV outages definitely haven't added up in length to a single outage from my former cable TV provider, which seemed to be something rain related and if it happened after bisness hours they didn't fix until the next bisness day (so a Friday outage killed cable for the whole weekend).

    As far as DVRs go before I had DTV I had DISH and a "stand alone" TiVo. I liked it so much I eventually got DTV and the "all in one" TiVo. The down side of the all in one is it won't let you record the audio-only music channels (you can watch them live), if you don't care about such channels then no problem. If you do it is a pain because you TiVo might change channels on you while you watch because you havn't touched the remote recently and it knows there is something on you asked it to record (or it thinks you will really want, and there is some free space on the drive).

    I've also been told none of the "home media options" are currently only for stand alone systems. Also there is no combo DVD-writer and Sat-reciever.

    On the upside it can record two things at once. Which is great because it means you can just tell it what you like and it can "just do the right thing" without have to tell you "I'm sorry, you are already recording FOO on Chanel X at HH:MM...do you want to record FOO or cancel FOO and get BAR?". Well, at least not as offen. More then two tuners would be nice :-) For me that is more important then the other stuff (esp. since I have had mine long enough that there was no home media option, or DVD writer when I made my choice).

    The other upside is once in a while my stand alone TiVo wouldn't quite be able to change the channel so I would get the wrong thing recorded. I tried moving the IR transmitter around, and even at one point making a tinfoil IR sheld/guide. I've never hade that problem with the DTiVo (unless you count when DTV changed FX's channel number and a bunch of my seassion passes stoped recording anything).

    Good luck with your choice.

    P.S. I pretty much only switched away from DISH to DTV because of the TiVo. If you decide on another PVR or a standalone one I have no real reason to recomend DTV over DISH. I was pretty happy with the service from both.

  141. Dish Network and Replay by nate_drake · · Score: 2, Informative

    We've got Dish Network, and in the 1.5 years we've had it, I can't remember ever seeing a bad picture due to the weather. We also have a Replay 5080, and they play nice together. Only bad part is that the Dish box we have can't be controlled via serial cable. We have to use the IR blaster. It's never missed a channel change though, so it isn't a big deal. The picture looks fine to me, but I'm not that picky.

    1. Re:Dish Network and Replay by BurgEnder · · Score: 1

      Same here. I've got two networked ReplayTV 5500 series DVR with Dish Network. There's really no other way in my opinion to watch TV. Have never missed a program, either.

  142. Video rentals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depending on your viewing preferences, and where you're located, you may find you get along fine without either cable or satellite.

    Most of what we watch is actually videos we've rented or bought. (Our neighborhood video store is very good, and gets in both movies and DVD sets of the best cable series. Other people have reported they like Netflix or similar rent-by-mail services.) If we want to watch networks or local stations, they come in well enough over the air with a decent antenna. For news, the Net is usually better than TV anyway. For sports that are only on cable or satellite, there are
    neighborhood bars (or neighbor's houses) where you can watch and be social too.

    Besides avoiding Yet Another Monthly Bill to enrich the local monopoly or oligopoly, this also lets us have more control over what we content we let into the house (which if you have little kids can be useful).

  143. Go with Satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in the Seattle area and have dealt with TCI/AT&T/Comcast since the 1980s. Bad picture quality, bad service and complete idiots behind the scenes at their cable "stores". Plus, they have a 1.5mbps cap on their cable modem service. The biggest issue to me was the bad picture quality. Ghost images, video noise, etc. They never seem to work out the problems and blame it on cheap tuners in our televisions (which is a crock). We now have DirecTV service (for about 2 years) and are very satisfied with the picture quality and service.

    So, if you live in the Pacific NW, I would wholeheartedly suggest Satellite TV. The only time we've had signal problems is during sunspot season and a few weeks ago we had a snow build-up on the dish that knocked out service for an hour or so.

    On the flip-side...I lived for 2.5 years near downtown San Diego and had WONDERFUL cable service through Cox Communications. Only two times did I lose service, and their cable modem had a 3mbps cap! Picture quality was usually excellent. If you live there, I would suggest you let features and price be your deciding factors.

  144. "I don't need broadband Internet (I use DSL)" by SengirV · · Score: 1
    uhh better check that chief. If you are further than 20 feet(slight exaggeration) from the CO, you ain't getting DSL at your new location. And do not rely on the local phone provider when they say it is offered, they have to run a line test. I get a call every other month saying "DSL is now available" at my location. But when they run the line test, it never is. Kinda funny/sad. And they wonder why they don't have a high a % of subscribers than South Korea - well, maybe because MOST people arn't within the magic radius, and the local phone people don't seem to care about the rest of us, that is why cable is kicking their ass.

    --

    Prof. Farnsworth - "Oh a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!"

    1. Re:"I don't need broadband Internet (I use DSL)" by DOCStoobie · · Score: 0

      Pick up a dictionary, and look up "BROADBAND" ... technically, DSL is broadband, and if not, then its TOO DAMNED SLOW ......

  145. Comcast lies by D3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Digital cable will have problems with signal from time to time as well so don't let them lie to you about signal quality. I was at a friends house last night for the SuperBowl and he had all sorts of pixellation problems with the signal to his new LCD set. In my county we have Comcast as the only cable provider and they constantly have outages because the system they inherited (bought) was never built correctly to service the capacity of residents here. My sat (Direct TV) has only had problems when VERY stormy to the point where you shouldn't be watching the TV as lightning may take out more than just signal. Even the recent hurricane didn't disrupt my signal more than 1/2 hour. The service I've had with Direct TV is WAY better than calling the cable company as well. The cable company here doesn't even have a way to speak to a human on the other end. You only get recorded "we are experiencing outages in the following areas (name of cities) and will have them fixed as soon as possible." They don't even give you a realistic timeframe!

    --
    Do really dense people warp space more than others?
    1. Re:Comcast lies by SpookyMark · · Score: 1

      There is no way to give you a realistic time frame for any repairs until you get out to the problem location, locate the problem, estimate the repair time. Since first off you have no way of knowing right a way if it is a fiber cut, pole down, simple transformer died etc. how in a world could anyone give you a time frame? If that would be the case we would never have any problems. Just a quick note. Keep in mind also that cable company gets a different feed then the sat provider, it is also possible that the feed from Texas was bad, I am not saying that it was the case but it could be. We see that alot. ( Yes I work for the cable company )

  146. My experience with both. by Krashed · · Score: 1

    I find that cable reception is generally very poor at best. Even when you go digital cable, most of the lower channels still come in as analog so they don't look all that great. With DirecTV, all of the channels are digital so there is never a problem with that. As for the satellite signal always going out, yes it does go out in heavy rain but my cable box goes out for no reason at all. It just says "Service will be available shortly". If there is a major problem with DirecTV, you can bet that it will be cleared up real quick cause the whole nation is waiting. With a local cable service, it may only be a small neighborhood and they can afford to take their time. As for the internet, Roadrunner is the best way to go in my area. It is only $45 a month for 3mbps while DSL is like $35 a month for 384kpbs. Which would you choose with 5 people in the house on 8 different computers, all downloading different shit, and occasional Lan parties all connected to the net?) I say for TV go to DirecTV, internet, go cable unless there is a decent offering in your area. My local cable provider is Time Warner Cable in the South Texas Rio Grande Valley region.

  147. Comcast by HitchHik · · Score: 1

    The plus about comcast is OnDemand - while you can simulate that with TiVo - the quality is better, plus you have a higher capacity than TiVo since the stuff is stored on the server. The minus is that the content does not change as frequently as I would like.
    They do have some cool stuff like Atom TV.
    I found that if you have old cableing in your house - make sure they replace it when they put it digital cable. Also quite a few chanels are not digital quality. The plus on that is that you don't need a DVR to watch them - just plug them in any TV and at least you'll have the basics. I wish they would rebroadcast ALL (not just the premium) analog channels in digital. Oh ... we need more HDTV channels and content. I now have 7 and I hate when I have to switch to the lower res.

    --
    -- &&
  148. They should try... by Pii · · Score: 3, Informative
    ...to align their dish correctly.

    Yes, the installation monkey aligned the dish in such a way that they had a signal on the day he came and went. That's just so they would sign the form, saying that it was correctly installed.

    Have them align it correctly, or get someone else to do it for them. A couple of degrees off in either axis (Or worse, both axis) can make all the difference in the world.

    When my DirecTV dish was first installed, I had transponder strengths in the mid-60s. When I realigned the dish myself, most of my transponders are now in the high 80s - low 90s.

    I haven't had an outage since. Rain-fade almost never occurs with a properly aligned dish.

    --
    For those that would die defending it, Freedom
    has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    1. Re:They should try... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget you can always beat rain-fade with a larger dish!

    2. Re:They should try... by Penguinshit · · Score: 1



      Don't forget it's also a good idea to have a proper grounding wire run from the dish. I knew a guy who had problems with his otherwise-properly-aligned dish. I bought $10 worth of solid-core groundwire, ran it, clamped it on his water supply pipe (after sanding off the 20 historical layers of exterior latex paint), and he's not had a problem since (rain, high winds, and bird shit be damned).

      Good thing, too.. I like watching hockey at his place...

  149. Dog sneezes DO affect quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my parents have satellite TV, and one time the dog sneezed and it messed up the picture for hours. I don't know what TV provider we have, but I think it runs on windows or msn. my parents used a WinDex program to fix it, and then it was good as new.

    maybe this WinDex is out for linux, too??

  150. Already there? by magarity · · Score: 1

    Are you assuming that your new place doesn't just come with either service? I bought a townhouse and was suprised to find that the HOA fee included a negotiated low rate for basic cable. Everyone in the subdivision gets it whether they use it or not. So have you asked about this possibility?

  151. Avoid Comcast by mabu · · Score: 1

    I have used Cox and Comcast and both are the pits. Especially Comcast. I noticed a dramatic improvement in quality between Cox and DirecTV and DirecTV is much cheaper. In my experience, the only time cable is cheaper than satellite is when you have multiple services bundled (local phone, internet and tv) but IMO it's foolish to have too many critical utilities from a single supplier. If cable goes out or you have a billing issue, you lose 3 major services instead of one.

    As for Comcast, trying to get a DVR to work with their network is kludgy at best. They are going out of their way to make their system un-compatible with Tivo. People hack their units using an IR signal box that is slow and often doesn't change channels properly and you end up recording the wrong shows. In contrast DirecTivo works perfectly and is fully-integrated and elegant.

    It's also become apparent that Comcast has its own plans for launching DVR service which involves a heavily crippled system in comparison to Tivo. Their intent is to move regular programming into a PPV model by not allowing customers much freedom over what they can record and how long they can hold these recordings on disk. Comcast seems to have the brilliant idea they can charge their customers $2-$3 each to view regular programming 48 hours or more after the broadcast date.

    Then there is the issue of Comcast being one of the largest sources of spam in the United States. I can't do business with them until they get their act together and offer their customers more reasonable choices and solutions.

  152. Cost & Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For starters

    I have dish network with a PVR. 2 recievers and local channels

    One thing to consider is local channels and how many TVs will be hooked up. Cable does not charge you extra for either while Dish charges about $5 extra for each additional set and $5 for local chanels this can quickly close the price gap with cable.

    On the other hand the PVR is excellent and there is no additional charge for the programming like tivo

    I have been less than thrilled with the quality of the picture as I think some channels are compressed heavily and I can see a loss of quality especially in low light scenes.

    I do lose the signal when an electrical storms passes between me and the sat. This generally lasts less than 10 mintutes and only in the summer time.

    If I had to choose again I would stick with Dish Network. If I had 5 TVs though I go with cable.

  153. replayTV by elcid73 · · Score: 1
    Since you are geek.. replay have networking built in to it right out the box and you can run a java app on your PC that allows your replayTV to see your pc as a "virtual replay." This allows you to stream the tv shows to your tv from your pc allowing extra storage for your shows. Act now while supplies last and you can get the older models (50XX series) that allow commercial advance (automagic comm. skip) and internet sharing (slow as molasses, but interesting) of recorded shows.

    Mix in the progressive scan output and the cheaper price, and case construction that looks "less cheap" than Tivo, and I say you've got a nice product. I've never used a Tivo, and from what I understand, the UI is better than replay, but I'm very happy with this product right out the box (no extra Home Media Option to network). I should point out that I don't have a land line and home networking was a must to get the guide/updates.

  154. Soon-to-be Satellite subscriber by read-only · · Score: 1

    I am switching to DirectTV this week. I did a lot of research. Here is what I discovered.

    I currently have Comcast cable/internet. I will get jammed another $10-$15 per month if I have internet without cable TV. This was initially what stopped me from switching, but I'm so fed up with Comcast that it doesn't matter anymore. In the end, I will pay about the same as what I pay now. However, I will get 1) more channels, 2) a DVR, 3) a receiver for 3 rooms/TVs. Try getting that from your cable provider.

    So my buddy just switched, and he loves his satellite. I just saw the who thing (DirectTV, DVR, the works) in action as his place this weekend. I was impressed. I asked about how the weather effects his signal, and despite having some heavy snow storms this past week, he has had no problems. For the record, even with cable TV I occasionally lose my signal or get "noise". (This is digital cable I have, and it can be ugly at times). So as far as I can tell, cable is just as likely to experience signal problems as satellite.

    As far as the DVR goes, I recently read an article about the options consumers have these days. You can buy a unit yourself or get one through your cable/satellite provider. Over a 2-3 period, getting your DVR through your satellite provider was the least expensive. I believe the monthly cost is $5 for the Tivo feature. I can do that.

    I am currently investigating wether customers can upgrade their DVRs at a later time. It sounds to me like in the near future these will include an interface (USB?) such that you can save your recorded shows to PC. Nice. I want that capability!

  155. DirecTV Cable by paRcat · · Score: 1

    I, for some reason, always believed the hype about satellite fading, etc. But I was really wanting a Tivo, and managed a free DirecTivo reciever for signing up with DirecTV. btw, in case you don't know, the DirecTivo has no built-in encoder, so it can't record off-the-air shows. No biggie for me.

    Anyway, back to the topic, I was amazed at just how good the sat picture was compared to cable. Digital cable's compression scheme is *horrible*, and I had no idea. The best way I can compare it, is the difference between DVD and VHS. Seriously. Whether you compare the regular cable channels or the digital channels, I think you'll be shocked at the difference.

    Also, I installed my own dish, which wasn't very hard. I shoot for an 80 or higher signal on a few random transponders, and it works fine. In the Oklahoma thunderstorms I'll get some dropout, but I'd say that is only once every few months. And if you really want to compare, 'rain fade' goes away within a few minutes, the Cable stays out for hours at least before it's fixed.

    Honestly, the cable companies seem like political candidates to me. I originally looked at switching because their commercials were really getting on my nerves. The Tivo just added value.

  156. Sunday Ticket and Mega March Madness by enkafan · · Score: 1

    I might be the only one who cares, but DirecTV has the ever evil monopoly over showing all the NFL games and this year is even showing all the NCAA games during NCAA tourney. Not to mention they showed some Fox NFL games in HD, where as my local affiliate has no intentions of upgrading to HD anytime soon.

    That being said, getting a satellite at an apartment didn't seem like it was worth the effort.

  157. Analog Cable -- because you still can by Bronz · · Score: 1

    I was able to get analog cable last year through Comcast, even though they stopped publically advertising it. Digital TV has completely destroyed the art of channel surfing. The horrid delay in waiting for the next channel to come up really forces you to use their 'preview' screens, which coincidentally also take forever to populate with information.

    Lastly, I can do whatever I want with analog -- all my TVs are ready for it and I'm not forced to buy or lease boxes. Sure, you may no longer be able to get HBO-4 through HBO-92 on analog, but it's got nearly everything.

  158. Dish Network by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

    My parents use the Dish Network PVR back home, and they love it. I would say that in the case of a satellite provider, purchasing their PVR is a much better solution than purchasing a standalone TiVo. From what I understand the tivo will pretty much be relegated to only recording when you tell it to, where as the satellite provider's PVR will allow for easy scheduling based on the built in program guide.

    However, I must suggest that you purchase a small UPS for your PVR receiver if you go with Dish network. My folks went through 4 PVR units before they bought a UPS for it. The software just isn't robust enough to easily recover from the daily (seriously!) power outages they have back home. Also, the software seems to have trouble when you fill up the HD to near capacity. I'd suggest leaving a buffer of about 2 hours just to be safe, but your mileage may vary. Again, this seems like it may be a software problem caused by the software's inability to handle extremely low hard drive constraints. Those issues aside, the PVR receiver is awesome. Scheduling a show to record is much easier done than, say, when I use the Guide+ software for my AIW Radeon. Playback is made easy by the inclusion of a button dedicated to taking you to your recorded library. Basically everything is simple and easy to use.

    As for signal, we really haven't had many problems at all. Really severe thunderstorms seem to be the biggest signal loss culprit... or the only signal loss situations I've experienced with the dish. The only thing that gets on my nerves is that occasionally macro blocking can become an issue when watching very dark movies or television shows. The macro blocking usually isn't too severe, but just the fact that it's apparent at all gets on my nerves.

    Anyway, my folks are happy with the service, and that's what matters. Dish was a very good alternative to their local cable provider and their old C-Band satellite dish.

    --

    If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  159. Cable vs. Dish - it is a consumer choice by SpookyMark · · Score: 1

    I work for Comcast cable here in CA, but not in any way am I trying to pump up my company. The service here has for the most part any channel I could ask for, from Tech TV to G4TV, Discovery Sci, Food Network etc. Almost every one of them is on a Digital tier which will give you pretty good video quality, I do alot of PVR stuff on my PC & it comes out almost a DVD quality ( the recording, using my Leadtek TV card ). Now, DVR boxes, we are in a trial mode at the moment, the biggest problem is the converter provider, the issues they are having is being worked out, I am hoping we will be able to get them out to the customers in next couple of weeks. But when it comes to testing it, I really liked it, in my opinion it is easier to use then my TiVO. Pause, Rewind etc. with the 2 hr buffer you can pause your TV for up to 2 hrs ( which I do often ). At this moment we provide around 10 HD channels, however there is more coming. Now, I do have alot of friends that have DirectTV or Dish Network ( keep in mind I am not trying to dog their service in any way, because I work for a cable company ), their biggest complain is that they get alot of pixeling on their sets, alot of freezes, they had couple of techs out there & each time they were told that there is not much they can do about it. From what I have seen DirectTV is over compressing their signal which will cause the pixeling. Now, onto the DSL service, now with the 3M down & 256K up on a cable modem I would never trade it for a DSL, here locally some of the DSL providers charge $45/month for a 128K up & 384K down, that is a rip off, especially that cable modem costs $50 per month & your get nice speeds. Even if I would not be working for a cable company I would go with the cable modem with out any questions in mind. Working for the cable here I wear their shirts with the logo, from time to time being at a grocery store I get some comments from people I dont know that our cable modem service kicks butt over DSL service ( this is not a joke ). Anyhow, it is up to you, you are the consumer, choose the one you want to go with, above are just my two cents. Mark

  160. DirecTV/TiVo is great by sootman · · Score: 1

    nice tight integreation, all in one box, one remote and the quality is great--DTiVos have no MPEG encoder, they just save the MPEG stream straight off the satellite, so whenever you watch, there is no genereational loss. (Not that there's much (or any noticeable) with the regular ones, but the geek in me likes the fact that there's no needless digital-analog-digital conversion happening.) Plus, a 40-hr Series 2 DTiVo is (or was recently at least) $99 at Circuit City.

    With DTiVo, the scheduling service (so you can do season passes, etc.) is only $5/mo, not $13. Yeah, there's the lifetime stuff, but (correct me if I'm wrong) the $250 covers you for the lieftime of the box, not your's, TiVo's, or DTV. A friend who has one with the lifetime thing will have to pay again when he gets his HD DTiVo (whenever that comes out.)

    PS--if you get a tivo, google for the codes and activate a) the 30-second skip and b) the one that lets you sort shows by record date, alphabetically, or by expiration (if you keep a lot of shows.)

    Oh yeah, and the TiVos are really easy to safely hack. My main one has two 120 GB drives and they went in as easily as you can imagine.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  161. Cable is *not* great by Pieroxy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have comcast at home and to be honest, the quality really sucks. It is like a regular TV with an average reception. every now and then you will loose either picture or sound or even both. Last time it lasted a few minutes but the time before that, it lasted two full days: We lost half of our channels. The decoder sucks ass as far as features and usability are concerned. It heats up a lot and freezes from time to time so you have to reboot it. Not too annoying unless you're not at home and are recording (PVR, VCR, etc...).

    I really expected a lot more from "digital cable".

    I don't know about the satellite though.

    1. Re:Cable is *not* great by Dielectric · · Score: 3, Informative

      I expected more, too, but got the same results. I'm returning their crappy space heater "receiver" and have dropped the digital cable altogether. Back to extended basic/analog for me. It worked for crap with my TiVo because I had to use the IR link, which was slow and missed changes even when I built the little tin foil shield tent.

      The reciever heated up so much, I used to have problems with my DVD player. The quality on the HBO stations, way up in digital land, was atrocious. I've seen fewer compression artifacts in bad pr0n scans on USENET (and believe me, I've seen a lot of 'em). When I'm paying extra for those premium stations, I expect better, which is exactly what I told the customer service rep. They said that digital cable is a great value and that they were sorry I was unhappy with the service.

      Screw Comcast and their awful digital cable. I'm going to make shadow puppets.

    2. Re:Cable is *not* great by NoodleSlayer · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who has Tivo + Digital Cable, I have DirecTivo. He couldn't believe the quality difference, then again neither could I. I couldn't believe someone would pay money for the incredibly poor quality of Comcast Digital Cable. Not to mention that whenever Comcast changed their cable lineup it would bork his Tivo box, and select channels (like SciFi) wouldn't work.

      Not to mention that occasionally his digital cable reciever box would hang up and get confused and be on the wrong channel. And despite all of this Digital Cable is more expensive then you're average DirecTV with local channels package.

  162. No satellite signal probs... by ohsoot · · Score: 0

    I have DirectTV w/ Tivo and have yet to lose the signal. I live in Germantown, MD which is northwest of DC. This includes having a foot of snow and ice on the dish, as well as no interruptions during the september(?) '03 hurricane (while the rest of my block lost reception for a week) My only complaint is that I can't get an HDTV signal yet.

  163. DirectTV by RobFrontier · · Score: 1

    I am a DirectTV customer and have been for around 8 or 9 years. I started out that way here in AZ because cable wasn't available in my neighborhood. I wouldn't ever consider switching to cable, even now that it is available. I like the flexiblity in programming options. Also when I move, I just take the dish with me, and set it up at the new place. No calls to the cable company necessary. As to signal quality, I lose my signal 2 or 3 times a year during a really heavy snow storm, or during our monsoon season. For the most part no problems though.

  164. My Experiences with Satellite vs Cable by Jorkapp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having used 4 different TV broadcast methods, I've gathered a good amount of experience and knowledge of the pros and cons of each.

    Satellite:
    Pros
    Good Image and Sound Quality
    Easy Timeshifting
    PVR capability
    Easy to use
    Can be self-installed
    Good packages that often include installation
    Availible wherever there is a view of the southern sky

    Cons
    Signal can be lost in very poor weather (usually takes a heavy snow/lightning storm)
    Crappy broadband
    PPV is over Dial-up (except for newer 2-way systems)
    18" dish sticking out of some part of your house
    Routing to another TV requires another reciever unit

    Analog Cable:
    Pros
    Uses Tuner built into TV
    Easily routable to another TV without expensive equipment
    Half-Decent broadband
    Availible in most neighborhoods

    Cons
    PVR requires external hardware (or you can use a VCR)
    No on-screen guide
    Expensive for # of channels you get
    Mandatory installation, usually expensive ($60+)
    Fewer channels

    Digital Cable:
    Pros
    On screen guide in PIP
    Creme-de-la-creme tech support
    Uses existing cable wire (nice if upgrading from analog)
    Older Analog channels + Newer Digital channels
    Very good picture and sound quality

    Cons
    Very expensive

    Bunny-Ears reciever unit
    Pros
    Cheap
    No monthly costs
    Local channels

    Cons
    Local channels only
    Shaky image quality
    Shaky sound quality
    Few channels

    --
    Frink: Nice try floyd, but you were designed for scrubbing, and scrubbing is what you shall do.
  165. You insensitive clod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I have rabbit-ears!

    (And there is a bit of signal loss during crummy weather from distant stations.)

  166. Satallite by Valegor · · Score: 1

    I have had Dish Network satellite service for about four years now. In that time I have lost my signal a total of 5 times that I can remember, and I'm sure a few that I cannot or was not home for. Each of those times there were very heavy storms and tornados reported in the area. My friends with Cable seem to have their cable out far more often then my satellite goes down, and when I lose the signal I don't have to wait for them to fix it, just for the storm to pass by. I also pay much less per month than my friends do. The cable quality and price are probably area dependent. As for DVRs, I have not had any direct experience with using them on Satellite so I cannot really say anything on the matter. For me it was not a matter of choosing between the two because I cannot get cable at my house, but based on what I have seen I would choose Satellite over cable. Oh, and I do get NASA TV.

  167. N. Va - Sucks? Oh yeah.. by +SiberWydow+ · · Score: 1

    Or did a few years back when I lived down there. Hey - do they still use the two cable system? I've never seen such a piece of shite in my life! Two cables for 1/2 the reception quality.

    1. Re:N. Va - Sucks? Oh yeah.. by Stingr · · Score: 1

      You'll find digital almost anywhere you go now (one cable) but that only happened in the last couple of years.

      I moved here about 6 or 7 years ago and I remember thinking to myself, "What's the second jack for???" Made no sense then, makes no sense now.

      --
      Chaos reigns within.
      Reflect, repent, and reboot.
      Order shall return.
    2. Re:N. Va - Sucks? Oh yeah.. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      They are *just* phasing out the 2 cable system here in Fairfax (N. VA).

      When they switched my apartment complex to digital cable, I had the joy of walking my old cable boxes to them and saying "Good Riddance!". The poor stiffs working the exchange couldn't quite grasp why I wouldn't want the digital cable boxes.

      DirecTivo rules in every sense. I can come up with a few nits about the service, but I'd have to really think about anything big that I'd change.

      As for weather, as everybody else has said, only in the most severe weather do I see any signal loss. in 2 years, maybe 5-6 times for a few minutes each. Cable would go out that many times a MONTH!.

      But then what to you expect from a cable company that can't even spell their own name properly...Cox Communications

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  168. DirectTV with Tivo - The Way to Go! by jordandeamattson · · Score: 1

    I have had both Comcast (AT&T Digital cable) and DirectTV with Tivo. In my opinion, DirectTV with Tivo is the way to go.

    In terms of signal losss we had more problems with AT&T Digital Cable then we have ever had with DirectTV. I can think of one or two times we lost the signal from DirectTV which wasn't clearly a problem on the source transmission end (i.e. fuzz/blank out form the field in broadcast during the SuperBowl).

    With AT&T Digital Cable, we lost the signal a number of times a month. One time we lost it for an entire weekend, because some took out a power pole. Our power was up, but we didn't have cable.

    In the interest of full disclosure, I am a Tivo fanatic. I love Tivo and how it has changed how we watch TV. One of the things that drove me to DirectTV with Tivo was the level of integration of Tivo into the system. Tivo is your set-top box. It is the control panel. It is where everything comes together. There is no trying to mate up things not designed to interoperate.

    What clinched the deal for me, was reading an interview in Forbes where the head of Comcast described Tivo users as, "Thives and pirates..."!

    I have seen the Comcast DVR, and it just doesn't compare to Tivo. The combination of great service and a great system makes it a no-brainer for me.

    Another great experience I had this weekend, was on their web site. I saw through the Tivo showcase that the Sundance channel was offering some movies I wanted to see. But the Sundance Channel is a premieum channel, and I don't receive it. So, I went to the web site, and ordered "Showtime" set of premieum channels. I spent a minute on the web site and three minutes later, things were up and running on my system!

    Yours,

    Jordan

  169. un-obstructed view of the southern sky by wiredog · · Score: 1
    Nice if you have it. I don't. Too many trees in the park next door.

    Loved DSS when I was in UT.

  170. Fragmentation of Market Choices: Shift to Dish by IgnacioB · · Score: 1

    Fragmentation is the rule now with our options to get TV. However with the increasing ability for smaller cities to get locals via Dish Network increases the pluses for it. Only time I've ever lost signal is when a giant hail storm super cell came by and I was far more worried about my windows being broken than watching TV. The shift likely will continue towards dish technology because of the inherently cheaper infrastructure of a dish vs. all the cable and fiber a cable company has to lay and maintain. The question for me is do you want that local cable access channel or not.

  171. It depends on your area by new2this · · Score: 1

    Honestly you would get a more accurate answer from the people living in your area. I happen to have Comcast and get excellent service. Only times I have had outages in past year was due to the fact that my entire neighborhood was without power. But I have a friend in a town 2 hours away who had tons of service problems with Comcast. I think when it boils down to it it's a matter of how well the techs in your area maintain the plant.

    I have several friends with satellite and i'm impressed with the pics. Only issues I see with sat is if you dont own the place you might have trouble mounting the dish in the best location.

    I would talk to some of your new neighbors and see how service has been for them. If service is great go with the cheapest. Just make sure you compare regular rates not some promo.

    As for the commercials. There have been ones against cable too. Both sides exagerate claims. That's the nature of advertising.

  172. correction by smackjer · · Score: 5, Informative
    TiVo will work, but to my knowledge, you need one specifically for satellite (i.e., standard store bought one for cable won't work).

    This isn't true. A standalone Tivo will work anywhere - cable, sattelite, antenna, whatever else somebody can come up with. I personally have used my series 1 Tivo with both analog cable and Dish sattelite with zero compatibility problems with either.

    --

    This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:correction by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      Okay, the piece I am missing is exactly how the TiVo communicates to the satellite receiver what channel it should be feeding to the TiVo? I'm guessing it sends out an IR signal?

      Also, I have an objection to the claim that this is better. How is digital MPEG -> analogue -> digital MPEG better than a capture of the initial MPEG?

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    2. Re:correction by smackjer · · Score: 1

      Tivo comes with an "IR blaster". The Tivo unit has an output jack which the IR blaster plugs into, and the other end has two IR transmitting LED's. Mount one to the top and one to the bottom of the cable box with double-sided tape (in front of the IR receiver, of course) and tell the Tivo what kind of box you have (so it knows what codes to transmit for each function). I agree that a standalone Tivo is not necessarily better than an integrated one. However, it is more flexible in application (use it in different setups). Since analog cable generally sucks as far as quality anyway, and you aren't doing digital-analog-digital conversion, it's not a huge issue. With digital cable and satellite you should at least strongly consider an integrated PVR. I've heard great things about DirecTivo, decent things about DishPVR, and mediocre things about cable DVRs.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:correction by Cramer · · Score: 1

      (crappy) IR Blaster, or, if supported, direct serial interface. On some receivers, the serial interface will actually disable the remote so only the tivo will be able to change the channel. (I don't think those are made anymore.)

    4. Re:correction by Sketch · · Score: 1

      The TiVo comes with an IR blaster. It also has a serial port for some sat receivers with serial control. I believe this is preferred if you have it as it allows for instant channel changes. The IR blaster manually types the number it wants to go to each time, which (at least with my slow dish receiver IR, it got confused if I set it to less delay between numbers) is about a 2 second process for a 4-digit channel number. It does this even if you use the up/down buttons on the TiVo control. And oddly (and this may be specific to my hardware), the IR blaster seems to interfere with the standard dish remote making it work slowly as well. So, channel surfing sucks. But after you get used to a TiVo, you won't channel surf much anymore anyway.

      On quality - I go from Dish Network receiver to TiVo via Svideo output, then from TiVo to TV via composite. I can't see a decrease in quality between just going straight from the DN box to the TV via composite, so I don't think you lose much by not recording the original stream directly off the satellite.

      --
      -- OpenVerse Visual Chat: http://openverse.com
    5. Re:correction by Lakers · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, my TiVo only has two options, cable and antenna. How would my TiVo know how to control a satellite receiver?

    6. Re:correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check again. It has the satellite option, you just don't remember seeing it.

    7. Re:correction by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      Very good answers, thank you.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    8. Re:correction by smackjer · · Score: 1

      All versions of standalone Tivo have had the ability to work with satellite systems, assuming your satellite receiver uses either IR or serial connection to change the channel.

      Satellite receivers have the same A/V outputs as cable boxes. Otherwise, they wouldn't work with anyone's TV. The Tivo just goes between the sat/cbl box and the TV. Optionally, you can stick a VCR in between the Tivo and TV.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    9. Re:correction by Cramer · · Score: 1

      C-Band... "big dish" -- or it used to. Does anyone still use a big dish? Everyone I know has moved to mini-dish hardware.

    10. Re:correction by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1
      You're wrong. I have the oldest model Tivo there is, and it has all the choices.

      But only if you do a complete setup.
      The choices you're seeing, are because of what you chose way back when, when you first setup tivo. All you have to do is a complete setup, and when you choose your zip code, and then choose the Company you're getting feed from, (in my case: DirectTV) you will then be able to choose their satellite receiver as one of the sources. Since my area doesn't carry local, I was able to choose: DirectTV + Antenna.

      I've helped others set up their tivos, and have moved 3 times, so I understand why it seems like tivo doesn't give you a choice at first glance. But the choices ARE there with a complete setup. (the one that takes the longest)

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    11. Re:correction by outlier · · Score: 1

      Mount one to the top and one to the bottom of the cable box with double-sided tape

      I've actually found that using both blasters to control one cable/satellite receiver is worse than using just one blaster. I used to have both blasters taped to the box, but I was getting a large number of channel change errors (e.g., a digit gets missed or misrecognized). After trying lots of different changes (e.g., switching to 'slow' IR signals), I found the most effective solution was to move one of the blasters away from the box. Since then, I've gone from an appoximately 5% failure rate to less than 1%.

    12. Re:correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      far as i know they've been BANNED in canada, thanks to Bell's lobbying.

  173. DirecTV billing by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    There is a $5/month charge for equipment per room. And finally DirecTV has had great problems getting me a bill in the mail each month.

    I'd recommend you have them deduct your bill each month from your credit card. That's what I do - I never worry about paying the bastards. No worries.

  174. Digital Cable is Horrible by smack.addict · · Score: 1
    I have used DirecTV, Comcast Digital Cable, and Dish Network. In that order. I absolutely hated digital cable.

    DirecTV
    Initially, I got DirecTV. The only trouble I had with reception was during terrible snow storms. Otherwise everything was just fine. In the end though, I hated being limited (as I was at the time) to two receivers. So I got digital cable.

    Comcast
    The program guide that ships with Comcast digital cable boxes is so horrible that it drives me absolutely nuts. Fortunately, on one of my TV's I had ReplayTV and could effectively ignore the Comcast program guide. On the others, however, I had to live through its slowness and the fact that ads take up a majority of the screen space.

    Very few channels with digital cable are actually digital. There is a noticeable quality difference between satelite and cable, even if you are not big into home theatre systems. I especially had problems with ghosting on one of the local channels!

    DishNetwork
    When I moved, I went back to satellite. I went with DishNetwork because I could get four receivers and not pay for the receivers. It was the best of both worlds. Honestly, now that I believe DirecTV offers similar deals (up to 4 receivers, no paying for the receiver), I doubt there is any difference between the two services. I like the program guide for DTV best, but DishNetwork is good enough--especially that I now have two ReplayTV units. I would flip a coin between choosing which sat network, but I would never in a million years go back to digital cable.

  175. Digital Vs analog + signal loss by dindi · · Score: 1

    I had a relatively big dish 120cm (4' -for you non metrics) back in europe for some years

    It has to be DAMN big rain to disrupt the signal (In Hungary it happened let's say 2-3 times a year)
    However snowstorms suck bigtime, and In heavy snow I found myself several time on the balcony, scratching ice & snow from my dish in -20C in underwear in the middle of a movie..

    Digital channels: good quality to a certain pont, after that, unwatchable (picture stalls like a bad encoded or scratched DVD or divx.. sound skips.. than you see green squares & numbers)

    Analog: quality drops with signal loss, but still able to see pics and soud in the heaviest rain/snowstorm

    I installed everything myself, It was a polar mount (turns to different geostationary satellites ) polarmount tilts the dish and head slightly moving E or W from so the polarisation sucks ...)

    my advise: buy/build a non polar mount 2 motor system that turns and tilts ...)
    My friend had 2 same brand receivers on top, and when hitting the remote, the 2 receivers turned the dish's two motors to the desired (recorded) position .... he had a 2.5m dish... I remember watching channels on his thing coming from completely outta footprint sats :)

  176. This winter was the test, I think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in NYC, I've had some pretty awful weather. Ice storms, wind storms, rain, rain, more rain, and lots of snow. Everything that was supposed to cause it to stop, didn't. I have a very strong signal (you can check your signal from your TV remote).

    I like the selection, I LOVE the price, and I really like the guide. I like being able to see, on screen, what is on for the night -- that crap with cable, having to look at everything on at the moment, watching it scroll through, is the pits.

    I have directv, by the way.

  177. Mod down parent FUD by Dani+Filth · · Score: 1

    1) The signal _rarely_ gets effected by weather.

    2) "electromagnetic interference from the sun" has yet to mess with my DirectTV rececption.

    3) "The dish could be hit by lightning, hail or high wind": Ground it during installation (as directed). I've had siding come off twice but my dish has never been hurt. In 4 years I've never even had to readjust it. Still get 90+ signal strength.

    4) "You can't get local channels": Pure bs. I get all the crappy local network TV in my area. Check out the DirecTV web site for local channel availability.

    1. Re:Mod down parent FUD by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

      That's still no reason to mod my topic down. Now you're resorting to personal attacks.

    2. Re:Mod down parent FUD by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

      Can your satellite dish survive basedball and softball-sized hail and winds up to 90+ MPH?

  178. Satellite, most definately by invisik · · Score: 1

    A big cable TV friend of mine recently changed to satellite. The picture quality of non-HD channels was awful. I got better of my roof antenna.

    Look for rebates and other deals on DirecTV equipment. My friends hardship with switching was the cost (he has like a jillion TV's) of buying all the equipment. It ended up costing him like $200 to change, and he got HD and DVR's and the whole works.

    Also consider the multisatellite system, as that's where yout HD channels come from and some other spanish and chinese-language programming, and the NASA channel. I guess they didn't have the bandwidth on their main satellite, so they off loaded it to another which the regular 18" dish equipment doesn't work it.

    Also, call DirecTV and say you are considering switching from cable and they will probably give you a few extra months free, which isn't all bad...

    -m

    --
    http://www.invisik.com
  179. Kill your TV by KlausBreuer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, really. What do you want with a TV? See films interrupted every couple of minutes by advertisements? See FOX news? See any kind of news?

    Have you ever looked at people watching TV? Their mouths hanging open a bit, a glazed look in their eyes... try it some time.

    Throw it away. Read a book. Gain several hours PER DAY in free time in which you can code, play computer games, go for a walk, talk to people, read slashdot...

    --
    Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
    1. Re:Kill your TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      comedy central == funny entertainment for 30 mins or so a day.

      tlc, discovery and history channel == learning something.

      and oh before you come back with "just read about those things" thats just stupid for a number of reasons. books dont have very good interviews with the source of information, it takes a number of books to get some decent info. and finally, give me a topic to go read about, quick, something i wouldnt normally know about.

      i do often read books mentioned on those channels though.

      hey cool, if i give up tv, i will have plenty of time to badger people about it, whom have clearly made teh decision they want to have that form of entertainment.

      the ask slashdot was about cable vs sattelite. where does your comment of neither help with that.

      did you think you were going to change his mind.

      thats great if you find life better without tv, but stop trying to be an apostle teaching people the "way" cause most dont care.

  180. Comcast has LOUSY Digital Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In our area (Eastern Prince Willian County, VA), Comcast's Digital offerings are sparse. Just HBO, Cinemax, Showtime, Movie Channel, along with lots of "Pay Per View". To make it look like they offer more channels, they added a lot of Music (Audio) channels. Is it the same elsewhere for Comcast?

  181. Kill Your TV by mankey+wanker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...or just get rabbit ears. The only things really worth watching are the occasional DVDs.

    The reception with rabbit ears varies with location, but even if the new season of "Friends" comes in all snowy - is that really a problem?

    A lot of worthwhile PBS is available via the net now. Or just read the transcripts.

  182. If you can choose, take satellite by Tux2000 · · Score: 1

    (Please note: German situation - US may be a little bit different)

    Cable advantages

    • No need for separate receivers
    • VCR and TV can share a single outlet (daisy-chained)
    • No extra costs for receivers
    • "fool-proof"

    Cable disadvantages

    • Limited program selection
    • Limited image and sound quality due to bandwidth restrictions
    • Program selection choosen by provider
    • Monthly fee (ever increasing)

    Satellite advantages

    • (Nearly) unlimited program selection
    • High image and sound quality
    • No monthy fee

    Satellite disadvantages

    • One reciever per TV, one receiver per VCR
    • One outlet per receiver
    • expert required for setup of antenna and cabling

    Weather problems? Guess where the cable providers get the TV program from! Right, a satellite antenna. Their's may be slightly larger than yours, but in bad weather, cable will also be disturbed. Lesson learned: Buy a BIG satellite antenna and good equipment. There is no need for gold-plated mast, but you should have a high-gain antenna, combined with low-attenuation cable. And you shold remember that the best amplifier is a good antenna.

    Looking at TCO, cable wins only if you need it for only a short time (say: a year). The longer you use it, the lower is the TCO for satellite compared to cable.

    Tux2000, forced to use cable

    --
    Denken hilft.
  183. Depends on where you live by Gkeeper80 · · Score: 1

    I subscribe to Comcast cable in Montgomery County, Maryland...for now. Comcast is run very independatly between diffrent areas. For example, in my area they cannot schedual service more then one day in advance. I called on a Thursday and was unable to get a service appointment on Saturday. Even talking to the manager was no help, he verified that in my area their managment software wouldn't allow them to make any appointments in advance. They also cannot re-send an incorrect bill. They sent out my bill, before the end of the month, and I called to change some of my subscriptions shortly afterwards. When the bill arrived, it was incorrect and a call to Comcast quickly verified that. I requested that they send me another, accurate, bill. A week later I received a print screen of their accounting software which makes no sense to someone un firmiliar with their software. A manager confirmed that bills are only sent by their corporate headquarters and only at a monthly interval, reguardless of circumstances.

    I've had many other spats with them over the course of my service, but don't know how long I'll be at my current address so I can't sign a contract with a satalite provider. But my simple answer is "Say No" to Comcast in Montgomery County Maryland. I've been told by friends that these sort of problems don't exist in Prince Georges County, Howard County, or in Arlington, VA. I can't speak for the rest of the country

    1. Re:Depends on where you live by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      If your service is out for 10 days in a month, only pay 2/3rds of your bill, after notifying the company of course. If they don't agree to this, complain to your state utilities regulatory board. There are laws covering this kind of thing and you actually have rights here as a paying customer. Denying someone a partial refund for 10 days of missed service is simply theft. Its no different from someone rigging their cable line to get free HBO. Even Comcast in Chicago prorates if your service is out for a day or more. If service interruptions are this bad, it warrants a complaint to the state even if they did prorate.

  184. Meanwhile in Brazil by famazza · · Score: 1

    Here in Brazil we have 2 major pay-tv options. Both sells cable (NET and TVA) and satellite (SKY and DirecTV) options. Basically the channels avaiable are equivalent, the first is slightly better for movies and the other for variety. But both are very good options.

    I've already tried three options, in both technologies (cable and satellite), and I prefer Cable.

    Why cable? Because Cable internet access is sheaper here in Brazil. Another point is that I can use my cable with more then one television.

    So I still prefer Cable.

    --

    -=-=-=-=
    I know life isn't fair, but why can't it ever be un-fair in MY favor!?
  185. Comcast Quality Cable TV by ljavelin · · Score: 1

    My sister has comcast. She has one of those big plasma TVs, and we watched the super bowl last night (yay Pats!).

    My sister subscribes to their "Digital" TV service. The picture was GREAT. It couldn't be beat, except when it freaked out and then the picture "regenerates" itself (the pixelation thing).

    We lost the signal two or three times during the game. I'm inclined to say that the total experience was "poor to fair", as losing a second or two of video three times over a 5 hour period is "lousy quality". I can't say if satellite is better or worse.

  186. Very Little Satellite Problems with Huge Advantage by mdbelt · · Score: 1

    Issues: I've been a DirecTV subscriber for 5 years. The only problem I have is with SEVERE electric storms here in the Midwest. Sometimes my Microwave will scramble the signal, but I thinks that's the microwaves fault. Customer Service: At one point when I had a cable package for internet at the same time as satellite the people at the cable company cared very little for their customers. The DirecTV reps always work with me when I RARELY have a question or problem. (I've called DirecTV maybe 3 times in the last 5 years.) Quality: I was never impressed with cable. The quality seems more grainy. I also couldn't stand not having immediate on screen menus. All in all I perceive my satellite as being crystal clear. Cost: I've always paid less for more with satellite.

  187. Something only digital cable can do... by DragonPup · · Score: 1

    Video On Demand. And I am not talking for PPV. I have RCN and HBO on my package. So with VOD I can tune into a bunch of HBO or Cinemax movies for free whenever I want to watch them. I can also watch eps of tons of HBO series(Sex in the City, Sopranos, Curb, Arliss, Real Time, etc), some of their comedy specials, some MaxAfterDark*cough* all for free as a HBO/Cinemax customer. I also get access to a lot of free content like ADV's anime channel, ESPN is getting into the act too. The abilitiy to pause, FF, and rewind are great too. VOD is something Satellite companies can't do at all, and it is so addictive. :)

    Getting back to your original question, the debate on whether Cable or Satellite is better very much so is determined to where you live. I suggest trying cable first(since you don't need to buy equipment or sign contracts), and if you aren't happy, try a Satellite provider.

    --
    "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
    1. Re:Something only digital cable can do... by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      Get a DirecTivo, and you won't miss VoD. It works across all channels, too.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Something only digital cable can do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I've never used it, your VOD sounds like a crippled version of a TIVO or a Replay...

      I can do all that you mentioned above with my Replay, and I can do it with any TV show I desire and it skips commercials automatically.

    3. Re:Something only digital cable can do... by DragonPup · · Score: 1

      While I've never used it, your VOD sounds like a crippled version of a TIVO or a Replay...

      It's not the same really. Like selecting the list of Cinemax movies brings up a few dozen movies at any one time. I select which i want to watch and watch it then and there. No pre-recording needed. Or if I want to do a mini-Arliss Marathon, I can watch the 5 or so eps available at any time on the spot. There's also VoD content not available as normal channels, such as the Anime Network ADV runs(mmm...free anime).

      --
      "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
    4. Re:Something only digital cable can do... by DOCStoobie · · Score: 0

      I like Ignorance, its great comedy .... VOD is not to record what is being broadcast, it is basically a server housing buttloads of programming that you can get "ON Demand"(hence the term Vodeo On Demand). there is no comparison, plus, if not now, but soon, he will be able to get DVR, VOD and HDTV all on the same box... Try learning what the hell you are talking about before you bag on something ... dish-hugger...

  188. Join the Sat testing community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your a geek, Join the testing community you can get started on kicknchicken

    Posted anonymously for uber obvious reasons

  189. My experience with satelite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have Dish network. It is possible to lose signal in very heavy rain. I am talking about something like an inch an hour so this is going to be a short term interruption at worst, because my row boat doesn't have TV anyway. Another issue can be snow accumulating on the dish - not a problem if you can reach it and brush it off or put a roof over it.

    You can also see problems when the sun is exactly in line with the satelite. This happens a few days a year and for perhaps an hour a day on those few days and is not always fatal anyway.

    You do need a clear path to the satelite. This can be an issue on heavilly wooded lots but its more likely to limit where you can put the dish than ability to get it at all.

    I have had both Dish and digital cable in recent years and the satellite clearly gives better picture under normal circumstances. They have more bandwidth than cable and in the case of cable the bandwidth limitations are frequently visible as mpeg "blocks" when they cannot send all the bits, especially on less popular channels.

    The only advantage of cable over satelite is the availability of community access channels. On the other hand you will probably find specialist channels on Satelite that are not available on cable.

    Satelite is a clear winner in my view. Note I am comparing digital cable - analog is a non-starter in terms of picture quality.

  190. I have DirecTV with TiVo (aka DirecTiVo) by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
    Here's what's good about it:

    I can pause live TV (up to 30 minutes).
    I can do a quick rewind of live TV for those WTF moments.
    And of course, I can easily pick shows to record, so I can watch them according to my schedule.
    Also, the quality is generally better than what I've seen on cable.

    However:

    The occassional thunderstorm can block your signal partially or completely.
    You have to pay extra for local or broadcast channels, if you can get them at all.
    Also, I've noticed some what look like compression artifacts while watching live TV, not just recorded shows. This seems to be new in the past six months, and I have not changed my hardware...
    And here's a tip: unless you intend to mod your DirecTivo, get the 3 year warranty. I've had mine about 18 months, and already the hard drive sometimes makes a loud grinding noise... and once or twice random characters appeared on the screen... I just hope it dies before the warranty is up.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    1. Re:I have DirecTV with TiVo (aka DirecTiVo) by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Cable + SA Tivo has most of those advantages too. The main advantage of DTivo is the ability to record 2 shows at the same time.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  191. WHY BOTHER ASKING? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've already made up your mind. Your not really weighing your options you've already made up your mind and you're just looking for reassurance. Stop wasting our time!

  192. Tivo is fantastic, but doesn't work for everything by neowolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I love, or should say "loved" Tivo. Unfortunately, it DOESN'T work with all cable boxes. Here in Colorado, at least, Comcast uses crappy "General Instruments/Motorola" digital cable boxes that don't accept Tivo's remote commands properly. (Actually, they don't even accept their own very well- very slow). There have been discussions in the various Tivo forums for years about work-arounds. The most common is to tape the Tivo IR sender directly over the IR receiver on the cable box, and then cover the front of both the Tivo and cable box with black electrical tape.

    Apparently the Tivo itself has an IR sender built into the front, and the cable box gets easily confused by any other IR activity besides its own remote (and simply locks is IR receiver temporarily), so the extra Tivo IR activity, along with the Tivo remote, really screw it up. Even doing this, Tivo was only able to change the channels properly about 50% of the time at best. With channels above 99, it had less than a 10% success rate. So- I ended up with hours of crap I wouldn't want to watch if I was paid to, while missing my favorite shows.

    On the other hand, I had a DirecTV receiver (by Sony) before that worked flawlessly with Tivo, and had a DirecTivo (also by Sony) that worked fantastic. With the exception of a couple of really nasty thunderstorms (with hail), I had no problems at all with my DirecTV system for over 3 years.

    The only reason I have cable is my significant other gets it for free because she works for Comcast. If I had to pay for one or the other, I wouldn't hesitate to get DirecTV again and dust off my Tivo.

  193. mmmmm...DirecTIVO by 23$kidoo · · Score: 1

    DirecTIVO is where it's at. As long as you have at least a dual-LNB dish, you can record two channels simultaneously (something the standalones can't do). The TIVO service is cheaper due to DIrecTV's deal with TIVO (IIRC 5.99/mo). The only time I've lost the signal was during a heavy snowstorm when snow built up on the dish. Even then, it was only some the channels. Since my dish is on the roof, I wasn't about to climb up there during the storm, but about five minutes with a supersoaker filled with windshield washer fluid did the trick. The one downside is that DirecTV is only selling series 2 TIVOs now and the 2's aren't as hackable as the series 1's. That's a minor quibble tho'.

  194. True geeks still use C-Band! by bigbigbison · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My parents still have the big huge dish in thier yard. You can get some pretty interesting stuff if you are willing to pay for the tech. Of course it IS a dying technology, but it is pretty interesting how they are trying keep it alive through things like 4dtv and mpeg sidecars.

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    1. Re:True geeks still use C-Band! by iantri · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Quality is wonderful too.. uncompressed high-quality analog video.

      Whenever I go over to a friends and watch their digital satellite, I am shocked at how terrible the quality is (very overcompressed). This is with StarChoice, in Canada. I don't know how it is in the States, but I've not been impressed with what I've seen here.

      Between my C-Band dish and my antenna, I get much better quality (and much much cheaper! I pay ~$60 Canadian per YEAR for my C-Band service, since I choose just the few channels I want), for the most part. The local stations (Toronto area) on broadcast look wonderful.. so do the UHF Buffalo stations (no static at all, strong image). Low VHF is a problem because of interference from Ontario Hydro's electrical lines, but that's another story...

      Am I the only one who finds analog noise more pleasing than digital macroblocking, though?

    2. Re:True geeks still use C-Band! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Latin America, you can get good quality C-Band programming as well: BrasilSat B1 (check lyngsat.com) has most of the "open" brazilian TV channels for "free" (the cost of the C band antenna, LNB and set top box). If you compare some of the best channels on B1 with the DirecTV you receive around here (http://www.directvla.com), the quality of some C-band channels such as Globo on B1 is really superior to channels as HBO/MovieCity on DirecTV when it comes to things such as color quality, and the like. I dont know if it's that most of B1 analogue programming is "coded" in PAL-M and not NTSC, and if that alone makes for the big difference at least for my eyes when it comes to color. (DTV receivers here in LA can do PAL-M, but it's doesn't improve things much)

    3. Re:True geeks still use C-Band! by extra88 · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who finds analog noise more pleasing than digital macroblocking, though?

      You definitely aren't the only one. I'm always annoyed when I'm watching something excellent like The Sopranos and there's a fade-to-black but instead of it being nice and smooth, the "black" is filled with blocky artifacts of varying shades. I like having the multiple "HBOs" but I wish we could still get HBO1 on an analog channel.

  195. inclimate weather? by ouchmyliver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OK, I changed to Directv about 5 years ago when I was completely fed up with my local cable company. TCI became AT&T which became Comcast...blah blah blah and I still couldn't get any decent channels. Since then I just have to laugh every time I hear one of the radio ads for the cable company talking about how much sattelite sucks because it can go out because of "rain fade". All I have to say about that is my DSS has NEVER gone dark due to rain...AND I LIVE IN SEATTLE!

    --
    "There is always an easy solution to every human problem -neat, plausible, and wrong." - H. L. Mencken
  196. Skip the cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go with the dish.

    I live in Denver, Colorado, and the only time I've ever lost the signal is when we hat four inches of snow piled up on the dish. Then it was a simple matter of brushing off the dish and viola! the picture returns. We've even had fifty MPH winds and never had the slightest signal degradation.

    Really bugs me seeing those commercials from Comcast about losing the picture--what a bunch of FUD. Whoever installed those bozos' dishes should be fired! The other commercials I hate are the ones where cable claims "you don't have to have separate equipment for every room in the house." Yeah, right! That's because every TV has digital cable decoders built in? They can all decrypt HBO and Showtime?

    I've got DirecTV with Tivo built in, and both my wife and I love it. It's great, the quality is superb, and it's really easy to use. Even my nine year old daughter has figured out how to record her shows with Tivo (much to my dismay). Ours is a few years old, and I've heard the new ones have some great new features.

    For picture and sound quality, digital cable versus satellite is a no-brainer. From what I understand, the signal for digital cable is actually in a lower resolution that standard television (so Comcast can squeeze in more channels). Satellite is something like 720x480 with almost the quality of a DVD and Dolby Digital sound, while digital cable is something like 320x200 and standard cable is 352x240 (my numbers may be off a little, but you get the idea).

    I've never been happy with Comcast support, but DirecTV has been incredible. The great thing about satellite is that everything can be taken care of over the phone. You never have to wait for a service person to come out.

    I installed my own dish, which was a breeze. I'd never done it before, but all it takes is a little patience (maybe some help so one person can watch the TV while the other aligns the dish initially).

  197. DirecTV all the way by Balthisar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have DirecTV, and am at a pretty sharp angle from their satellites (longer distance, in Michigan). I also have an oval dish instead of a round one in order to get "Para Todos" service in Spanish for my wife. This means signal meters for both satellites. I get about 68/100 on both satellites. When I had just the round dish, I usually got high 80's. Despite that, I only usually get a broken/lost signals in super-heavy downpours of rain -- maybe three times per year. It could be more, it's not like the TV is on 24-7.

    Additionally I get free basic cable from Comcast, who provides my internet connection. So I save a couple of bucks by not getting DirecTV local channels (although Telefutura'd be nice [soccer]).

    I use it with an original Sony-built TiVo series 1. It nicely integrates the cable and DirecTV receiver so that I get a single stream of channels, i.e., it's smart enough to use the built-in tuner for cable and to control the DirecTV box for the higher channels. The guide and everything is similarly unbroken. The nice thing about the TiVo series one is it's a geek haven -- it's YOUR box and you can do with it what you will. Checkout "Hacking TiVo" over at Amazon, reviewed here sometime in the past.

    My decision is based mostly on the languages and channels offered (i.e., all the Spanish stuff for my wife), so I'd never, ever consider Comcast for all my needs here in Michigan. I imagine that in downtown L.A. the cable options for my needs would be better. But still, I was a DirecTV customer since before I met my wife, so I guess I'm just overall really, really happy with it.

    --
    --Jim (me)
  198. DirecTV with TiVo by DarkMagician07 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I got one of these a few months ago, and even though we don't have some of the features that the stand-alone boxes have, I really enjoy it. The local cable company is about $65 a month for the same channels I get for $45 (including Tivo service) from DirecTV. I get all of the locals that are worth getting, and if I was outside of the area for my locals, I could get national access to ABC,NBC,CBS, etc. for either no cost, or $5 a month.

  199. It Depends... by tokenhillbilly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have Dish Network, and all of the evil things that Comcast says about rain and wind and leaves in fall are true. Having said that, I have been pretty happy with the PVR they offer. Not TiVo, but sufficient.

    Depending on what you watch, and how important picture quality is to you, cable may actually be a better bet. I am in a Comcast service area and am seriously considering switching. For one thing, the local channels on Dish are horrible. They compress them to the point of being unwatchable. This just became clear to me when I bought a big screen television.

    The same holds true for the less popular cable channels. Most of the popular channels are pretty good quality. I don't know what bit rate Comcast uses for their channels, but I thought that I would give them a try for a couple of months and do a side by side comparison.

    If you have a clean plant, the analog channels are actually much better quality than the digital ones. (I know... flame bait). In a big market, the cable companies take a lot of their feeds directly from the station. A good clean analog signal has 10 to 20 times more picture quality than a compressed signal from Dish network. OTOH, a crappy analog signal is unwatchable. Since they just rebuilt the plant around here, the analog signals look pretty good.

    As for the PVR issue, Comcast has just started rolling out the Motrola DVR box. They only have the single tuner model available now, but that's all I have with Dish and it hasn't been a problem. Most programs that I watch are repeated many times so there is always a time when I can record them when I am not watching something else.

    Of course, if you are a realityTV or sports junkie, even two tuners may not be enough. In that case, both Dish and DirectTV (and Time-Warner Cable) have dual tuner PVR boxes. You can actually record two channels while you are watching something that was previously recorded. Pretty cool, but a bit much for me. Motorola is coming out with one (HD as well), but it's probably a ways down the road. Comcast is almost totally Motorola.

    As far as the broadband issue, I also have DSL, but if I switch to Comcast, I will probably switch to cable modem. Again, it don't cost much to try it out. They offer 3 Mb/s downstream, while DSL limits me to about 1.2 Mb/s.

  200. If it's Comcast, then go with a dish by casmithva · · Score: 2, Insightful
    We had Comcast cable three years ago and lost it when Comcast came through to do the neighborhood-wide upgrade to digital cable. After two weeks of yelling at the customer service people and not receiving the repeatedly promised call from a line supervisor to coordinate a repair of the line feeding our house, we turned to DirecTV. Five or six weeks after we disconnected cable service, Comcast called up and asked if our line/quality problems had been fixed. My response, "Yes, by DirecTV."

    We've had DirecTV ever since and have had very reliable service -- more reliable than (analog) Comcast, to be honest. We lose the satellite signal in very heavy rain, and usually for only fifteen minutes at most. (We're more likely to lose power than satellite, to be honest.) We've never lost signal due to trees, clouds, wind, ice, snow, steady rain, dogs sneezing, cats coughing, kids screaming, birds crapping, etc.

    As for DVRs, we do have a DirecTV TiVo. It's probably not as good as a standalone series 2 TiVo, but I don't know how well a standalone TiVo integrates with DirecTV as compared to a DirecTV TiVo. Works fine, regardless, and we wouldn't give it up.

  201. try really hard rain by knitting+fool · · Score: 1

    My parents live in the country (in the midwest) and didn't have the option of cable, so they have directv. During very heavy rain storms they will lose their signal. It's definately the heavy rain, and not the lightning. The rain is rarely that bad, so my parents feel like the service is still worth it. It's also pretty funny to see Matlock freeze in the middle of a cross-examination.

    --
    -- Give us your technology and we'll give you all the cow lips you want.
  202. yay comcast cable(those greedy bastards!) by MattFromOpp · · Score: 1

    I've used comcast digital cable in Tuscaloosa alabama and I loved it. My parents house where I've spent much time over the years has a dish network receiver, in a very very rural area, a BAD storm will interrupt the satellite. I'd make the call based on the kind of weather you have in your area, and cost. I loved the digital comcast cable, but it was expensive, satellite isnt much better, just make the call on the weather you have and the best programming package for the buck, I'd go digital cable with comcast, it just had more options, it did have service outages because of weather also at times too.

  203. Cable has one advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you own Tivo and you want to watch one thing while the other is recording, a cheap cable splitter will allow this. If you have a dish then you get one output per receiver. My wife and I have cable only because we live in an appartment and the building is in the way of the line of sight with the satelite. Before getting married, my wife lived with her parents and they have satelite (and she has a tivo) and everything worked great.

    1. Re:Cable has one advantage by kb1cvh · · Score: 2, Informative

      For digital cable, another cable box would be required, not just a cable splitter.

      I still use Cable modem as it's the closest thing to getting a fixed ip address, routable, without paying for Business class DSL. I'm not running a business.

      We just got Direct TV with Tivo. Can record two programs while watching a 3rd simulataneously.
      The Hughs HDVR2 we have also has a 120GB hard drive. A good website on Tivo is http://www.tivocommunity.com

      --
      Peter AI6PG
    2. Re:Cable has one advantage by kb1cvh · · Score: 1

      One disadvatage of Direct TV which I forgot to mention was that on Direct TV, we don't get the Community Cable stations, e.g. Cable Access channels. Thus, I can't watch reruns of Alderman meetings or get the no school and winter parking ban notices. I have to go to the web for the winter parking ban notice or wait for and watch the damn news.

      That's key as here in Somerville Mass, they recently ticketed 2000 autos and towed 300 cars in anticipation of a storm that didn't arrive.
      Credit to the city and tow company is that they decided to refund the tickets/fees. A snow emergency is declared if there is a warning of more then 4 inches snow accumulation.

      Peter

      --
      Peter AI6PG
  204. Dish! by Tatarize · · Score: 1

    Dish has a new box with two tuners, and built in PVR. The built in PVR is actually better than TiVo brand PVR IMHO. The two tuners don't work well together yet, but they update their firm ware all the time so its just a matter of time before the system starts to work perfectly.

    --

    It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
    1. Re:Dish! by stripes · · Score: 1
      Dish has a new box with two tuners, and built in PVR. The built in PVR is actually better than TiVo brand PVR IMHO. The two tuners don't work well together yet, but they update their firm ware all the time so its just a matter of time before the system starts to work perfectly.

      Is this the Moxie box? I heard bits and pieces about it before it was released (one of their employes use to pose on some of the TiVo boards I use to read a lot).

      What do you like better about it? From what I recall they said they would have something like TiVo's "Session Pass Priority Manager" but some how much better. Do they? And is it? And if so, how? I also seem to recall them saying you would be able to hook them together over 802.11, did that come to pass? And if so is it like TiVo does it (you can play shows stored on the other TiVos, and move them, and maybe even schedule recordings, but you can't say "I want X, Y, and Z recorded, I don't care which TiVo gets them, just make sure they all get got!").

    2. Re:Dish! by Tatarize · · Score: 1

      http://www.dishnetwork.com/content/products/receiv ers/dvr/index.shtml PVR Dish 522, is what I was referring to. The two tuners are built into the same box. So one tuner records one thing to the harddrive while the other records the other. As far as I know it has about none of the stuff you mentioned. The real advantage it has over traditional tivo is it already gets all the channel listings and all the features are so well built in that its second nature. Not that you need to be a geek to use TiVo but it's nice to have everything second nature and a one time payment for the box. TiVo brand TiVo has far too much TiVo.

      --

      It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
  205. Most Cable companies use DBS systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well the sad reality is most of the cable companies ues DBS to get their programming. The local adelphia receivers are in the field across from my house and guess what they have directv, and they also have one large white sat. When you see those commercials telling you how bad sat is remember they are using it so if it is that bad you are going to get it with them also. The other 2 local cable companies buy their service from Directv but they are so bad they don't even edit out the directv commercials. Maybe it is different in larger areas but in my neck of the woods the cable companies offer you horrible service for a much higher price. I would go with dish network so you don't get sued by directv for buying any computer equipment that might be used to steal their signal. They are truly an evil company

  206. Satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know how Comcast does it, but I know Charter still sends the first 100 channels analog even if you have the digital receiver.

    Also, the program guide sucks on the digital receiver I have. Its hard to navigate, filled with ads, and feels sluggish; it actually takes time to redraw the screen.

  207. Yea and nay by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    At my parent's house, we occasionally have problems with the weather, but only with severe storms that are likely to knock out the power half an hour later anyway. At least the satellite gives us a nice 30-minute warning that we're going to have bad weather.

    In other words, we only have had problem with satellite in the same situations where we would've been without cable too. I agree with the parent. Pick the service based on the programming.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Yea and nay by jroysdon · · Score: 1


      That's why my DireTiVo has a UPS ;-)

      Although, I don't have the TV plugged into the battery powered part, just the surge protected part.

  208. Comcast versus DirecTV by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 4, Informative

    I in a Comcast area (suburban Illinois) and have been through almost every configuration they have both regular and digital. I had DirecTV and Dish Network back in Phonenix, but now I just moved back to DirecTV.

    My biggest desire to move back to DirecTV was HDTV. I feel that DirecTV in the long term will provide better HD options that local cable. Couple that with almost every HD DirecTV receiver able to tune to HD over-air broadcasts and provide local channels via Satellite or over-air, there is little that cable can possibly offer over DirecTV.

    I did lots of studying. The most annoying thing is that Comcast doesn't even want to begin to provide you details about when they will offer HDTV in my area, though they advertise it on TV.

    As far as reception. I was a bit concerned about the "we loose our signal all the time" and all I can say, mounted on my roof, I get strong signal all the time, even in the snow. I know that heavy weather (it is the water) can distort the signal and you have to be careful if your dish builds up snow, but if that does become an issue, there are several workarounds including sprays, covers and other items that make sure your LNB doesn't get "watered" down.

    I totally hated the Digital Cable. They over compress the channels and the receivers were about as slow as molassass.

    My DirecTV install experience was excellent, a lot better than my cable, where they didn't even know what they were doing. I expected to have to educate the DirecTV guy (since I have quite an extensive custom built whole house distribution system) but he didn't have a problem and did a very professional clean install. The cable guy just did his thing but the DirecTV guy asked permission before doing any physical changes.

    I am VERY happy with the programming selection on DirecTV versus Comcast. They just are damn good at what they do. Calling them recently about getting CBS-HD for the superbowl was super easy and very friendly. Lot better than calling my local cable franchise.

    Well, there are my two cents...

    --
    D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
    1. Re:Comcast versus DirecTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here in Connecticut. CBS-HD broadcast the Superbowl. I got to see Janet's nipple in High Definition on a 50" Panansonic HDTV! Yup, sucks when the ABC/NBC/CBS networks broadcast 480p 4:3 ratio! But some shows switch to 16:9 ratio then switch back. Overall, the quality is excellent even on 480p 4:3 ratio, I just hate the sidebars.

      Sure the technology of the Satelite companies is higher. i.e. better receivers, better programming guides, integrated TiVo, all digital programming, and HD. But cable works in Apartments and Condos, low lying valleys (My brother's house is in a heavily populated valley and cannot get a dish signal. The installation was aborted when the tech came out and surveyed the location), they offer broadband speeds that are consistent everywhere (DSL speed varies and may not even be feasible in some locations), and most locations are offering phone service too. So for a large portion of the population, cable is the only choice if you want decent TV.

      It depends on if you own a home, have a good line of sight to the event horizon, have a quality installation, want two more bills for phone and Internet, want 8 different cable splits for the entire house and not pay extra.

      It's a tough choice, but looking at pricing, they both come out with many pluses and minuses.

  209. DirectTV for Me by jamesoutlaw · · Score: 1

    I have DirectTV and am very happy with it. Time Warner supplies cable TV in this area and I have found they are a horrible horrible horrible company to deal with... so I don't deal with them. I lose a satellite signal occasionally when it rains, but the outage lasts only a few minutes and it happens so infrequently that I don't care. I had more service interruptions when I had actual cable service than when I do now with DirectTV.

  210. HDTV = Satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I have tried both routes w/ an HDTV and there is NO comparison. I had satellite and went to get broadband from the cable company (then AT&T, now comcast).
    After the cable guy hooks it up and turns it on there is black snow all over the picture. I said when are you going to fine tune it? He says that's it. What??? Turns out that digital cable only means those over channel 99 - that is 2 thru 99 are ANALOG and 100-120 are digital. Digital looks like satellite and the anaglog - well, looks like CRAP!
    As far as weather goes I live in Texas, home of some of the meanest storms in the country. The only time you loose it is when the clouds are exceptionally heavy. I have had it for 3 years and have lost the signal 2 or 3 times, which is probably half of the times I have lost the cable for my broadband and phone (cable phone).

    In Short Satellite blows the doors off of cable.

    1. Re:HDTV = Satellite by DHR · · Score: 1

      I think you're confusing digital cable and HDTV.

      It's pretty well known that satelite compresses their HDTV feeds more than cable or OTA.

      As for analog sucking, that's probably due to the horrible Motorola boxes that Comcast uses. It's also pretty well known that they have horrible analog tuners in them.

    2. Re:HDTV = Satellite by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      Your main point -- that unlike DirecTV or Dish, most channels on a "digital cable" system are, often, still analog -- is right, and important; but I just have to add that in neither case are we talking about "HDTV". The picture DirecTV puts out looks much better than my old analog Comcast service did, but it's not even full standard-def resolution; it's SVCD resolution, 480x480.

      HDTV, by contrast, is typically 1280x720 or 1920x1080. Some digital stations also broadcast in 704x480, but that's just considered DTV, not HDTV.

      Where cable may have an advantage nowadays is precisely in its ability to deliver true HDTV locals. DirecTV and Dish don't do it -- and CAN'T do it, because it would take so much bandwidth (they have enough trouble delivering their 480x480 locals). There are some workarounds -- you can get CBS, and soon Fox, via national feeds in areas where the network owns your local station. But for the most part, you'll have to pick up HDTV locals off the air if you want to stick with a satellite provider. Fortunately, the HDTV-capable satellite receivers are also OTA-capable, and can integrate off-air digital channels into their lineups.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:HDTV = Satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your right that the satellites are not HDTV (unless, of course, you get an HDTV tuner - which BTW Dish is giving away now). The problem comes, as I am guessing in the doubler. AFAIK when an HDTV set gets a non HD signal it line doubles (that is what my owners manual says) and with an analog signal it looks like it doubles the noise, which looks like black snow - just my guess.

      I wanted to go OTA for locals but I live a little too far out to get the locals without a boom - which is not allowed in my neighborhood. So far I have been too cheap to get the HD receiver ($600 for existing customers). Guess I'll have to pony up or quit for a while and then get a free one ;-)

      Anyway you cut it cable has nothing to offer an HDTV user - at least not as far as I can see. I guess the thing that pissed me off the most was that I asked these questions when I went to cable and they told me every channel on cable was HD - yeah right!

  211. Oh, come off it already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...asking the minions of Slashdot to help you to a decision.

    If you were a true geek you would have no time for that mindless brain-sucking box... eschew the box and leave it for the sweating hordes... take the money and get that processor upgrade or some more ram for that other brain-sucking box you've been spending time with...

  212. DirecTV rocks... but NASA tv by cyberwoozle · · Score: 1

    is only available with an extra dish, as it's on a totally different satellite...

    also, I have had ReplayTV for years, and the combination makes it hard to visit other's houses without DirecTV or Replay...

  213. Always remember this... by randomErr · · Score: 1

    Comcast Sucks. Google had over 31,000 matches on how bad Comcast sucks.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  214. The difference by CaptScarlet22 · · Score: 1

    The only difference, in my eyes, is that Direct TV has the FOOTBALL Package, and Cable doesn't. But your a nerd, so maybe that won't matter!!

    I love my DVR Cable Package.

    The only plus is my Wife works for the cable company, so I have all the channels for free!!


    --
    It's left blank because I have nothing to say to you punks!
  215. I just switched... by cplater · · Score: 1

    to DirecTV in mid-December. If you watch the local ads, Circuit City usually throws in an extra on top of the free system. I ended up getting a 3 room DirecTV system w/ TiVO and a free home theater in a box (AMW, not top of the line, but good enough for the small room where we have our TV,) for $99 after rebates. The quality of the signal is great. We have not had one problem.

    One thing you need to ask yourself when you see the cable company spots about satelling quality is "Where does the cable company get their feed?" The answer: Satellite.
    The DirecTV w/ TiVo is awesome, but 40 hours is a bit low. The good thing is the Hughes box can be upgraded w/ minimal difficulty (I haven't done it yet, but weaknees has upgrade kits.)

    --
    -- Charles A. Plater
  216. per Month charges by smoon · · Score: 1

    One advantage to cable is that they usually have to provide a 'low cost' option, aside from the $40/50/60 'basic' package.

    We have this, it's $8.95 per month, and has about 28 channels, including NASA. Technically it's supposed to have less, but they just give you 'basic' with a filter to block channels 24+. In practice 25 comes in snowy, 76 is snowy, and 77-116 are fine. (Albany NY area, Time Warner -- your milage may vary)

    You have to push and prod and get the cable company to admit to offering this, but it's worth looking into.

    Of course you don't have the 100+ channels and endless opportunities for pay-per-view, but then you've got an extra $40 a month to buy DVDs or use for other entertainment purposes...

    --
    "But actually trying to use m4 as a general-purpose langage would be deeply perverse" --ESR
  217. Integrated TiVo units by wart · · Score: 1

    Several posters have commented that the DirecTV TiVo units are great. There's a catch with them, though. They only work with DirecTV. If you ever decide to switch to a different service provider, such as cable or Dish Networks, your integrated TiVo unit will become useless.

    I've been using a separate TiVo unit with my DirecTV service and have not had any problems with picture quality. Then again, I also don't have a 54" HDTV plasma TV, so picture quality isn't my highest concern.

    I'll also support what other DirecTV customers have said here: In Pasadena, CA I've never had a loss of signal due to weather. The two times that I've had reception problems were caused by my buggy RCA DirecTV receiver.

  218. Bad weather outages by Experiment+626 · · Score: 1

    and are playing TV spots about how satellite TV signals can be lost when it rains, when the wind blows

    Cable companies like to use this as a marketing point, and there is some truth to it. As the worst part of a heavy storm blows through, you may lose satellite reception for a half hour or so. But it's not exclusively a satellite problem.

    I have DirecTV and also basic cable for local channels and a cable modem. One night during a particularly nasty storm, I was trying to watch cable, and all the channels had a "searching for satellite signal" screen. Cable companies use satellite dishes within their infrastructure too, they're just big 6 foot ones instead of 18" dishes for the end user. Harder for a storm to knock out, but it can happen.

    1. Re:Bad weather outages by jamesoutlaw · · Score: 1

      Along that same line of thought ... We had some severe wind (gale force) last summer which caused major power outages all over the city. In some areas here, the cable lines are also above ground. It took Time Warner Cable several weeks to restore service to their customers. Even in the worst weather, the outages I've experienced with DirectTV only lasted about an hour - and that only happened once.

  219. PrimeStar, then DirecTV for 6 years by NetFu · · Score: 1

    We live in the Silcon Valley (Milpitas, CA, on the northeast border of San Jose), and we had Primestar from the beginning when we bought our house 6 1/2 years ago. After a couple of years, DirecTV bought Primestar and upgraded our equipment (receivers and dish) for FREE. Over the years, we continue to get better and better service (on the TV, on the phone, and in person) at absolutely no additional cost over what we pay monthly.

    The DirecTV/Tivo integration is the absolute best because it's direct digital recording of the MP2 DirecTV feed. I haven't seen anything close to as good as when you get a combo DirecTV/Tivo device.

    On the weather question, it's funny that this came up on Slashdot now because we're having a severe rainstorm here this morning. The only time we *momentarily* lose signal is when we have extremely heavy rain (the kind where if you walk outside for 10 seconds, you're utterly soaked). By "momentarily", I mean it periodically pops in and out digitally while you have that extremely heavy rain.

    Otherwise, normal rain and wind don't affect the reception whatsoever -- after all, we're not talking about an old fashioned roof-mounted TV antenna, the technology is quite a bit better than that.

    On Comcast digital cable, I can only repeat what my long-time friends at work have to say -- it's generally better than older cable service, but they have much more frequent digital glitches (similar to what we get on DirecTV during heavy rain) than we do with DirecTV. Also, remember that Comcast is still the same cable company with horrible service (i.e. GLACIALLY slow). DirecTV service is always there to help quickly partly due to the fact that their customers have far fewer problems to complain about.

  220. Re: cable vs. satellite by Hoohoodilly · · Score: 1

    We have Cox cable where I live which I get both broadband and cable tv from. I've had nothing but problems from them. Disconnections about once a week, their prices keep going up, and to top it all off, there's nothing I can do about it because they are the only provider in town. Plus, living on the bottom floor of an apartment eliminates the use of a dish.

    The truth is my father used to sell satellites, back in the day when they were 12-16 foot dishes so I just have to laugh at the cable companies that do this. I see these commercials all the time talking about how much better Cox is than satellite when the fact is they use large dishes to receive some of their signals which is why they also can lose their signal in bad storms.

  221. It all depends on your city... by cbovasso · · Score: 1

    I live in Philadelphia which is Comcast country. They offer every bell and whistle to their customers since the city is a flagship city for them. My area of the city does not have Comcast, we have Time Warner. Time Warner could care less about Philly so we dont have all the bells and whistles of its flagship city, NYC.

    I had DirecTV for a month and dropped it b/c they did not carry the local SportsNet in Philly. But Time warner has been great so far, the Road Runner service has run excellent, the TW digital cable guide is great, as is HDTV.

    I would say if the local provider in your city sucks then go with DirecTV. I think the local cable company should be first on your list though.. IMHO

    --
    I ask for a car and I get a computer. How's about that for being born under a bad .sig?
  222. Thunderstorms and Snow can cause signal drop by Knight2K · · Score: 1

    My family has had DirectTV for about 7 years, and we've experienced signal fade at least a couple of times a year. We live in the Northeast and if you get a pretty heavy snow or really strong thunderstorm the signal can drop. Heavy rain can also cause loss of a couple of transponders, so some channels will feature random drops of pixels in the channel or the loss of some channels. If the weather in your area is generally pretty mild it's fine; but if you are looking for 99.9% reliable, then digital cable may be the only game in town.

    From the DirectTiVO perspective; never tried that, but I think I would prefer to get a seperate TiVO box. Then modding is an option if you want more capacity and if anything happens to the satellite box or the TiVO, the broken component can be repaired or replaced without completely losing the ability to watch programs (assuming you have a big TiVO backlog of shows). I also don't mind trading some space for the ability to upgrade components seperately as needed.

    --
    ======
    In X-Windows the client serves YOU!
  223. Dish Network by lunartik · · Score: 1

    I have Dish Network, which I bought through Dish Planet. I heard about my deal through my cousin, who heard about it on local radio. I get something like 70 channels, plus local, two boxes, $17.98/mo. They have different promotions going on at different times and generally you might hear their ads on FM radio, but I haven't found a better deal.

    No signal problems either.

  224. Don't get any by cjthompson · · Score: 1

    TV sucks, it's just an ad-fest.

  225. Cable versus Satellite providers by kulakovich · · Score: 1

    I just went through all this myself, with a survey as of eight weeks ago, and I can say that the satellite providers ran on a monthly average $15 cheaper than any comperable package cable could put together.

    After having each of the Sat providers for over a year at previous apartments I can say that we lost signal perhaps three, maybe four times in as many years, each during thunderstorms. If it is of any help, I am in the NE U.S.

    Most importantly!! - NASAtv is free on C-band. I just put up a 7.5 foot dish in my yard for that exact purpose, to watch the Mars expeditions. And it is analog, uncompressed, and gorgeous!

    Kulakovich

  226. Analog Cable -- because it looks better by bensyverson · · Score: 1

    I totally agree. Digital cable and satellite look terrible in my opinion. Compression artifacts galore. I can only imagine what super-compressed HD will look like once it's available. Analog cable is smooth and crisp -- and cheap! The only thing I miss is the occasional decompression error, rendering someone's face as a moving mass of DCT garbage. But then, I still get that sometimes when a station's Digibeta deck hits a glitch, so it's all good...

    1. Re:Analog Cable -- because it looks better by iantri · · Score: 1
      It depends.. in some places the analog cable service is terrible.. lots of interference and a weak signal.

      It is okay here (Near Toronto, Ontario, Canada).. though the signal is a little weak.

      Personally, I have an antenna (wonderful quality for local channels) and C-Band dish (cheap, uncompressed high-quality analog video).. I hate compression artefacts too..

  227. DirecTV and TiVo by mjolnir_ · · Score: 1

    Another vote in favor of the DirecTV/TiVo combo receiver unit. I installed a 4-line dish myself on the roof of my Brooklyn building and connected two lines in, so I can do all of the TiVo tricks on dual tuners.

    My wife failed to understand when I tried to explain what a TiVo was and what it could do, and how cool/necessary ownership was, until I handed her the remote. Her parents still don't get it, despite our best efforts..

    hth. -mj

  228. Satellite Signal by rider_prider · · Score: 1

    you need to properly mount the dish (so it will not move in the wind) and adjust for the maximum signal possible, this will reduce weather effects. However downpours (like multiple inches of rain/hour) or very heavy snow will block your signal. I live in southern Alberta (very windy - often 60 kph, peak 80-100) and have never had wind effect my dish signal (see note on proper mounting above)

  229. Satellite wins for me by Gordo_1 · · Score: 1

    I've had both (used Bell Expressvu Staellite in the US as well as MediaOne/AT&T/Comcast cable).

    More or less, it comes down to which service has the content you want most. However there are several differences that make satellite a better choice for me:

    I absolutely hate Comcast's digital cable channel surfing interface. I like to flip through channels quickly, and the digital cable interface prevents me from doing that because it's so slow and difficult to navigate. The guide screen is much quicker to respond, more intuitive and more informative with DishNetwork/Expressvu IMO (both are based on the same hardware/software -- just different branding).

    As far as the weather goes... don't believe the cable companies' hype. I subscribe to NHL CenterIce on Comcast cable right now (not due to choice mind you), and believe it or not, I experience more blips and outages on these channels as I did with satellite due to the fact that the signal is travelling mostly by satelite from the game locations to the cable operator before it's ever placed on a cable to get to your home.

    Also picture quality stinks with comcast digital. They must be pushing the mpeg compression really high, because the artifacts are absolutely noticeable on anything larger than a 27" TV and fast moving sports plays often show noticeable blockiness. Expressvu is much cleaner on large screens.

  230. Comcast has questionable business practices by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    I don't trust Comcast - they have a tendancy to turn your cable off without telling you, just so you are forced to call them and they can upsell you on their new services. This happened recently to both myself and a friend of mine. In my case, I waited a few days to call because I thought the cable might come back on on its own. When I finally was forced to call, all they had to do was throw a switch and my cable was back on - they were just waiting for me to complain.

  231. two words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chain saw

  232. DirecTV over Comcast by illuminata · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comcast tells you that they provide digital cable, but all of your basic and extended basic channels (up to the 100s) are still analog. As far as weather goes, Comcast still goes out when a storm rolls over their local property. DirecTV did go out a little bit more often when heavy precipitation occurs, but it's nowhere near ss bad as the cable ads put on.

    Comcast also gives me ads on their slow, oversized program guide (provided by TV Guide). When I get program info or use a full-screen menu, they greet me with two. You can even select them with your remote to get more info! Whoopee! They also transmit slowly. At least people who don't purchase any digital packages don't have to put up with them.

    As far as picture quality goes, DirecTV still wins. Comcast's signal strength is a problem in my area. They have to work on the area lines about once every three months, and you're generally at their mercy for anywhere from a few hours to a few days. In fact, the analog stations often look better than the digital ones, and sometimes certain digital channels won't be able to find a signal at all. My place had the coaxial cabling rewired throughout when I first moved in, too. There are a lot of blurry edges around objects, much like you'd see with a poorly compressed MPEG. DirecTV's picture is better, although there is about a half second's delay in transmission compared to cable.

    Last but not least, Comcast charges more for less. The channels are worse and the packages are grouped so that there's a little bit of everything in each one, rather than grouping them by genre (except for the movie channels). We don't even get basics like the Travel Channel yet. They just now gave us E! and FoodTV.

    The only reason that I can see for going with Comcast is to receive local channels in better quality (although DirecTV is picking up the slack in that area). If that isn't a huge sticking point, go with DirecTV.

    --


    Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
  233. Does everyone besides me hate Comcast? by jtseng · · Score: 1

    I personally have no desire to use any of the satellite TV providers. I've got Comcast in the western Anne Arundel area and I've never had them screw me over ever. We've got a decent movie package (HBO, SHO, Skinemax, etc.), VOD and increased broadband bandwidth along with very good local coverage and two digital converters for less than $95/mo. And starting in a couple of mos they're also going to have HD-equipped converters/DVRs.

    --

    Sanity.html - Error 404 not found

  234. Anything Comcast by Razzak · · Score: 1

    Really. Comcast stinks. Cable internet goes out for about two days a month (I know this isn't your question) and my cable tv reception (analog) consistently gets captioned jibberish along it (maybe 1/5 shows). Further, it's twice the price of satellite with half the channels. Oh yeah, and if I want HDTV, it costs an extra $15 per month + $5 per channel, whereas for satellite it's $12 per month for all channels.

    True, you will have to hook up a seperate antenna for network HD, but that is *so* worth it. I'd already be over to satellite if my apt didn't come with free comcast. I'm getting what I pay for, but those poor shmo's putting out $60/month for comcast sure aren't.

  235. Does anyone know... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

    if the Phillips Direct TV Tivo supports the home media option?

  236. Neither by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

    Neither offers anything worth watching, with the possible exception of the sci fi channel which I wish would switch to the Internet. Its getting harder and harder to justify paying for TV.

  237. Cable Companies use satellites by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Cable companies are FOS about satellites, if you go to the central cable station you will see that they get all their feeds by satellite and are vulnerable to inclement weather. Why pay a middleman?

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:Cable Companies use satellites by DOCStoobie · · Score: 0

      Hey... are you a rocket surgeon??? did you notice that it is a HUGE freaking dish?? you want one of THOSE at your house??(bonehead) ... the surface size of the dish DIRECTLY affects the signal strength .... so while 4" of snow might cover your tiny little 12" dish ... it would take an ICE AGE to cover the 120' monster at the cable co.'s headend....

    2. Re:Cable Companies use satellites by avandesande · · Score: 1

      120'? try 12', and they are big because they are c-band. I don't give a shit about snow, a sufficiently dense rain cloud blocks the signal.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:Cable Companies use satellites by DOCStoobie · · Score: 0

      You haven't seen the 120' "sky-catcher" dish?? it is 120' wide, and is wide enough to cath the entire horizon, and you simply position your LNB's on a long bar in the center....

  238. Cable vs. Satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had DirecTV but switched to Digital cable(Charter) for internet access. I much prefer DirecTV. Satellite picture quality is superior and I had far more channel selections. Just a thought but the last time I went by the cable company they were getting their signal through a large satellite dish :-). During severe thunder/rain storms I have seen the same artifacts on cable that I did on my satellite.

  239. Get Direct TV, here's why by Teahouse · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have had Direct TV for 4 years now. I have NEVER had a problem with reception, whether it's in high winds or in torrential rains. Sounds like your cable company is selling FUD.

    The next reason is simple, you get more options. If you like the NFL, you can only get NFL SUnday TIcket through Direct TV. It's really nice being able to bring up any game I want on Sunday. Further, with TIVO, I can record my favorite teams games for the entire season! They also do March Madness, Basebal, and Hockey int he same manner. The Sports pay program is awesome.

    Finally, Direct TV will be bringing you more HDTV stations faster. They are committed to HDTV, and although the programming is now pretty slim, they are digital ready to broadcast all HDTV stations when the time comes.

    My recommendation, get Direct TV with the Tivo box and buy an inexpensive HDTV. That package will set you up for the next decade. It's that good. Enjoy!

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
    1. Re:Get Direct TV, here's why by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      I hate exclusive deals like that. I would never get the Sunday Ticket but I'd like the choice on my DISH.

      How bout we give you BingoTV and you give us the Sunday Ticket?

  240. Satellite zealots almost as bad as... by swb · · Score: 1

    ...other tech zealots. I don't have a preference for one or other other (my wife, however, has rejected satellite because of the dish on the roof..), but I seem to run into satellite zealots who insist that cable is always evil and inferior to satellite.

    I'm not a cable fan, but Crime-Warner cable where I live is priced competitively with packages I've been able to compute for satellite, service has been good the two times it was needed (one time was when we buried our service), and I don't have to make an investment in hardware or fsck around with a satellite mount my other half doesn't want.

    1. Re:Satellite zealots almost as bad as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough*whipped*cough*

  241. Depends by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Will your homeowners association/condo complex/apartment complex let you install a dish? That's #1 to look at. :)

    Otherwise, I'd go with DirecTV. Better channel lineup and they're not raising rates every 6 months like Comcast has been doing in the Bay Area. =/

    1. Re:Depends by HaveNoMouth · · Score: 1
      Will your homeowners association/condo complex/apartment complex let you install a dish?

      It is illegal in most cases for a homeowners association to prohibit you from installing a satellite TV antenna of the type used by DirecTV or Dish Network.

  242. Satelitte Comcast by Seeker310 · · Score: 1

    I'll just chime in by saying that anything that would knock out your satelitte picture would knock out comcast too...since they get their good channels from a satelitte feed ;p Also unless you have more than 2 tv's going satelitte will be cheaper...

  243. I know its been said by ev1lcanuck · · Score: 1

    We've had DirecTV sicne December 2000 and it's been great, haven't had a single outage that lasted longer than a minute (i think we only had it twice because of those pesky solar flares). We have 4 DTV boxes, one is a TiVo, one is a RCA HD receiver, and two are Sony SAT-B55s. They all work great, and the sony set top boxes have no problem being controlled by Windows Media Center.

    I'd recommend DirecTV in a heartbeat, their service is excellent and their customer support is also excellent; I've only ever had one technical question and it was solved in a 5 minute call to them (almost no hold time).

    Hope this helps in your considerations!

  244. Cable, satellite & the Super Bowl - an answer? by djeaux · · Score: 2, Informative
    Last night, I had to videotape the Super Bowl for my in-laws, because I have cable TV & they have DishTV satellite. Turns out that DishTV can't carry CBS in our area, because a broadcast station won't let them. The broadcast station is on my cable, hence my VCR got a workout.

    Before going to a satellite, be certain that you either have an antenna capable of getting local broadcast channels or that your satellite provider will carry the local content you want.

    That said, anybody who's posted here that your best option is to quit watching TV altogether is probably right.

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  245. Not entirely accurate. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    The head-end does use satellites for sending original signals, but in all fairness, they have much better antennas with better ability to withstand winds and with much more power.

    But to be fair, it is also easier to fix problems at home using an antenna then to have to trust a bunch of screwed up companies such as comcast.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  246. Comcast vs. DirecTV by Casshan-Robot+Hunter · · Score: 1

    Well, here's my $.02 and personal experience.

    At the moment, I have Comcast digital cable. Whoopee. For one, the basic cable box that they give you (in my area) is crappy. No S-Video out, no digital sound. AND, you cannot preset shows to watch, in case you will not be home, or want to record things on different channels while you are on vacation. Now, I thought that would be a standard, no-brainer feature. I mean, since the first time I got DirecTV 8 years ago, that was a standard feature. With DirecTV, if you want to set something to watch later, you look at it in the program guide and click on it. A checkmark appears, viola! Timed programming. Oh, and comcast is charging several dollars a month for every other cable box in the house (what the hell for?), whereas DirecTV no longer does.

    Picture quality. Comcast heavily compresses their video. So much so that when I am watching a movie on HBO, and there is a scene that takes place in the dark, black isn't black. It has ghosts and compression errors and color bands. Which show up really strongly on my 27" Trinitron. My analog channels don't do that, though, go figure. DirecTV uses mpeg2 compression, very similar to that of DVD, very high quality. The DirecTV box has S-Video standard, and the last box I had had optical audio out.

    Reliability. In the 11 months that I have had Comcast, I have had 10 times as much outage than I did with 8 years of DirecTV. I lived in an area that quite often had inclement weather, lots of snow, wind, etc. For one thing, those commercials that the cable companies have about DirecTV are just BS. (Like the one where the guy had to put it on a pole, so he duct taped it to a stick. Hey buddy, you're an idiot! You're too stupid to own DirecTV. Mounted mine to a pole that I mounted to the house, and put a small bit of concrete (about the size of a coffee can) as an anchor, and it never moved.) The only time I had signal loss was when we had lots of heavy, wet snow that coated the dish. Then I went outside with a broom and brushed it off - signal was back. Often these days, with Comcast, the signal will just go out for no reason, or all of a sudden all the channels become the TV Guide channel. Or, somehow the box will start begging for the parental control password (there isn't one) or telling me that I need to subscribe to every channel that I am subscribed to.

    In conclusion, I would have to say that for the most part, DirecTV is vastly superior to Comcast Digital Cable. (Oh yeah, the channels even change faster with DirecTV!) The only thing Comcast has going for it is Broadband Internet.

    Oh, you may be wondering why I have Comcast at all? It's because the roommates I moved in with already had it - and the broadband internet. Oh, well, I guess I'll have to deal.

    --
    Why oh why didn't I take the purple pill?
  247. Hi-Def Content by Pii · · Score: 1
    Satellite does offer some HD, but not as much as I would like.

    DirecTV offers HBO, Showtime, ESPN, and some others (Including some PPV; Total of like 9 channels).

    They lack local networks in HD though, and that's a gripe I've got. It's a bandwidth issue on the satellites. They simply can't carry all of the local networks with their current capacity.

    --
    For those that would die defending it, Freedom
    has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    1. Re:Hi-Def Content by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess my options are 1) HD tuner for local only, 2) HD for satellite or 3) wait until comcast offers HD in Indiana.

      Sigh.

    2. Re:Hi-Def Content by Pii · · Score: 1
      It really depends on how committed you are to the project...

      There's a Canadian satellite company that's carrying the East and West coast feeds for the major US networks, in Hi-Def. If you go to the AVS forums, you can get their information. There are a number of resellers for that service here in the US.

      The people that are using it have good things to say. Equipment is the same as Dish network.

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
  248. sattelite is more reliable by Thundersnatch · · Score: 1
    ...at least in Downtown Chicago. Over five years, I lived in verious areas of the city, in high-rises and houses. I used two different cable providers, RCN and AT&T. In every case, my cable would go out several times per week, for at least a few hours. There were just too many cables running around the city, too connect/disconnects, and too many pirates for those companies to be able to run a reliable cable infrastructure.

    I switeched to DirecTV four years ago, and my service has gone out only three times, for a few hours at most. This is in the worst weather Chicago has to offer. If you securely mount your dish on a vertical post or wall (instead of on a roof, where snow can't drift up to it, and water can pool up and foul your cables) weather is not really a problem. If you do see rain fade, you can get a larger dish for less than $100 that will fix the issue.

    I have heard anecdotal evidence that service levels have gone up in Chicago since Comacast took over AT&T's network, but I've also heard anecdotal evidence that things have gotten worse in the Chicago suburbs. So who knows.

  249. I love cable by Geeyzus · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to chime in after seeing all the anti-cable posts. I used to have DirecTV and DSL from my phone company. It was expensive, and it was decent but not without its problems. My satellite would definitely go out during storms.

    I moved, and now have cable. One nice thing is that I get my TV and internet through the same place and it is dramatically cheaper for me (YMMV). The speeds I get with cable internet are a lot better (again, you might see different results). And I have never had the cable TV signal die. As far as quality, the satellite picture might be a little better, but for my purposes I can't really tell the difference. I'm not even getting digital cable though, I just get the basic analog package and it works great (and is cheap). Just my 2 cents,

    Mark

    1. Re:I love cable by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      My satellite would definitely go out during storms.

      If your satellite was affected by storms maybe it should have been in a higher orbit.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
  250. Cable vs. Satelite by hsteck_ylf · · Score: 1

    My Grandparents in Southern California have satelite tv, and it was horrible when there was wind. 10-15mph winds made it impossible to watch. I would definatly go with cable if you have that option. I would only every use satelite if there was no cable that I had access to...

    --
    If you are expecting something here, I don't know what to tell you...
  251. Get a life by a1z26b2y25 · · Score: 1

    Do something worthwhile. TV is for the same people who: - Never win the lottery. - Have nothing better to do. - Have no love life. - Have no money. - Stiff the pizza delivery guy. - Drink their sorrows away. - etc.............

  252. Comcast blows Klezzy chunks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know anything about TV, because I don't watch it. But I do have a cable modem, and I do admin a bunch of corporate mailservers (not on cable modems).

    Comcast still has Klez raging through their networks. It gets sent through their mailservers (that's right, not from clients, from Comcast.net mailservers that ought to be running virus scanners) thousands of times a day.

    Comcast's response? They prohibit client nodes on their net from contacting each other's SMTP ports. That's right, if I want to use my secured, virus-free box to send an email to one of my co-workers' secured, virus-free boxes, I have to send it through Comcast's incompetently administered, constantly crashing mail system.

    But they *don't* prohibit client nodes from directly sending SMTP to external nodes, which is why you get all those "Power Bottle" and "Herbal Viagra" messages in your spambox, er, mailbox every day.

    Comcast is grossly incompetent and will not listen to those who are willing to tell them how to fix their problems. I have offered to re-architect their damn network for free, just so I could get decent service, and they never call me back or even ask for my qualifications. Losers.

  253. Hurricane Experience by IgD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live in southeastern Virginia in the Hampton Roads area. When the hurricane hit last fall, the rain was barely sprinkling and the cable TV went down for over a week. My phone service is also tied into the cable so was also down. However, cellular pretty much survived throughout the entire hurricane with only minimal downtime. I laugh everytime I see those cable TV commercials saying their landlines provide better signal quality, etc. After the main storm was over and all the power was out, my family and I sat in our living room and watched DirecTV powered by our generator. :)

  254. I agree. "none of the above" is best option by joggle · · Score: 2, Informative
    The story poster even mentioned desiring to watch NASA TV. Guess what? They broadcast on the web as well! The quality isn't the same as broadcast TV, but most of the time the audio is fine and you can get more detailed photos from their website.

    If you're unwilling to let go of your TV, then a nice substitution I've found for cable is Netflix. Let's face it. Out of 100+ channels, how often is nothing good on anyway? At least with a DVD subscription you can watch exactly what you want to watch whenever you have time to do so. It also can limit how much TV you watch during the week (which is a GOOD thing :).

  255. Satellite rocks by spectasaurus · · Score: 1

    I used to have DirecTV satellite service and enjoyed it a lot. I certainly did experience rain fade and loss of signal in heavy snowfalls, but this was in New England where it is always either raining or snowing. I think I probably lost a signal maybe 5-6 times in a year, and usually only for a few minutes.

    I've since moved and now have digital cable. I hate it. The quality is lousy compared to my old satellite, and the Motorola cable box is a joke. The on-screen guide is not very useful (only shows 30 minutes at a time) and is very slow and painful to use. Given the choice, I think it's a no-brainer. Go with the satellite.

  256. DirecTV by select+*+from · · Score: 1

    I've had DirecTV for probably 6 years now.

    In the six years, they've only upped the prices a couple times...compared with our local Comcast which changes a couple times a year it seems. In fact, last week I got a notice for rate changes from Comcast but fortunately it doesn't affect the cable modem which is all I get from them.

    As for weather, I live in the midwest and a couple times a summer I get rain fade. Actually it is a good predictor of weather, becuase it will fade before the storm hits. And when it does lose the signal, you know you are in for a heck of a storm. I will say that it is a lot more reliable than cable ever was.

    Combined with Tivo..whether a standalone (which is what I have because DirecTV doesn't have our locals yet) or the integrated one, it is a nice combination to have.

    Pixelation does occur...it is very noticeable in scenes of fog and smoke. But all in all it is a decent picture that always put the analog cable picture quality to shame.

  257. The weather has to be severe to cause an outage by sagefire.org · · Score: 1

    I was traveling in Costa Rica. When I was in a small town on the West Coast, there were little stores with Satelite Internet hook-ups. The only time they went down was when a Rainy Season downpour was in full force. So, unless you are talking about truly extreme weather, I wouldn't worry about SateliteTV, since, I would imagine, the Internet Connection would probably be more sensative to outages.

  258. My experience by gerardrj · · Score: 1

    First, I am an advocate of diversifying my connections, I would never consider allowing my voice, data and television communications to all come over the same wire or even provider. One cable cut or power failure and you're completely cut off from the world with the exception of radio. I use QWest for voice, cable for data and satellite for video.

    More directly to your questions:

    What I've used and why I chose satellite for video
    I used to use digital cable for video, and gave up after lousy service from two different cable operators in my area (Mesa, AZ) and switched to Dish Network's Dish 500 system (a 4900 receiver) about 5 years ago. I don't think I'll ever go back to cable. It wasn't just the low quality and unreliable nature of my digital cable; the ADs in the program guide really pissed me off also. Dish doesn't have that. One of the providers was taking up about 1/3 of the screen for ad space on the program guide. It might not have been so bad if it were just ads for pay-per-view, but I was getting ads for beer, cars, etc. Dish does put ads on the "Open-TV" based interactive content, but I really don't use that and it seems to be just pay-per-view ads anyway.

    Quality of signal/video
    My dish is not exactly line-of-sight to the satellites, it's partially blocked by the house, but that's because I prefer the dish to be completely hidden from sight from the street. Still, I've only rarely had loss of signal. All of my outages were when a major thunderstorm cell moved directly in my dish's line to the satellite. Even then I usually only lost one of that sats or just a few transponders. I have not yet lost all reception from both sats. I've never lost video in a simple rain storm, one of our famous Arizona dust storms or the like. There was one freak-ish time that a low-flying(~1500ft) bomber blocked my signal for a few seconds, but how often does that happen? Considering I live 2 miles from the final approach of a Confederate Fair Force wing and see low-flying bombers almost weekly and only had one signal loss: not that often.

    There's an aspect to digital satellite video that can be viewed as either a positive or negative: Unlike analog signals, Dish's signals are either on or off. You either get a pristine image or no image at all. There's no snow, static, ghosting, etc. This leads to very abrupt outages when they do happen. The video will play fine, then stutter or pause for a few seconds while audio continues, then it all goes out an you get the "aquiring satellite" page. The only way to ascertain the signal strength is to go in to the "setup" menu of the reciever and look at the signal strength bars for each transponder from each satellite.

    PVR/recording options
    As for the recording option: go with the digital recorder offered/authorized by your digital provider. Recording the direct digital signal from the sats is a much better way to go than a separate Tivo with the extra digital->analog step and extra cabling. I know that Dish's PVRs are now all Linux/GNU based and Dish's source is posted on their site, so hacking should be more interesting if that's your game.

    Science television
    NASA-TV is priceless, but at least on dish the Reasearch Channel out of University of Washington and the UCTV feeds are also tremendously interesting and educational. There's a few other channles with some neat science info, and Free Speech TV (FSTV) is educational on an entirely different level whether you agree or disagree with the messages in the programs.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  259. Putting aside all the politics involved... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

    ...and the fact that there is a near monopoly in the satellite industry, I would still say that satellite offers a significantly better alternative to cable. Where I live I can only choose from Cox digital cable, and I have to say... they should spell their name differently.

    Cox charges $59 a month for digital cable (no internet bundled in, if you want that it's $89 a month). Although they claim an unreal number of channels (500 I think), when it comes to most people the reality is that there are only 48 channels. PPV channels should never be counted as actual channels since most people never watch them unless they are either rich or stupid. (These days, those two seem to be mutually inclusive)

    I chose DirecTV and have been about 98% satisfied with it. Yes. When there is a good rain storm, the signal dissappears. I will say that this happens maybe four times to me. Based on my average of 2-4 hours of TV watching per week, it may happen more frequently for a real couch potato. It can be pretty frustrating if you've scheduled a show to record and instead you get the "signal not available" message for the first 10-15 minutes. But it's a nuisance I can live with considering that I get a great signal when it does work and I pay a lot less than digital cable. (More on the cost in a moment) Again, DirecTV claims som ungodly number of channels (by skipping large ranges). For example the music channels are in the 900s. But again, the reality is much lower. About a year ago I counted 67 actual channels I might have an interest in watching. The number of channels applied with the cost per month ($42 per month if just a basic subscriber vs. the next level up. I wound up going up a level). After taxes, the monthly cost is still $52 a month for my expanded package. So.. it's obvious to see the better value in DirecTV. That's why I can live with the occasional signal loss.

    1. Re:Putting aside all the politics involved... by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Hey Trolling, do you or anyone else know how to actually SPLIT a satellite signal?

      I love the DTV, but what pisses me off is that I have to have 2 lines coming down from the stupid satellite into the stupid house. :) And if I want the HD version, that'll be a different satellite and _3_ lines.

      And each line has to go straight to the TV where the receiver's plugged in. All I want to do is have all the data hoses coming into my house go to one central location and then split from there to wherever I want them to go! I can't believe how hard it is to find any info about this...

      Oh well, at least it works in the rain here. Though hurricane Isabel knocked my dish sideways, and it don't work so well pointing directly at the ground. :)

    2. Re:Putting aside all the politics involved... by tmhsiao · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like you need a multiswitch. You might find a good overview at this thread at TivoCommunity.

      If you want something more complicated (i.e. all transponders+local OTA channels coming in on a single line of coax), then you might need a stacker/deStacker combo, but if you just want to have more odd+even lines, you should be able to get by with a multiswitch.

      --
      "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
    3. Re:Putting aside all the politics involved... by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Well HALLELUIA!!! :)

      Thanks man, that's been bugging me for ages...

  260. just my experience by daweb · · Score: 1

    I can see a difference even with Digital cable and Direct TV's picture quality. Had Dish network previously and Direct TV was better then that too. (i.e. Direct TV has the better Picture) I do not use HDTV yet so that is not an issue here. I also have outages rather RARELY. in fact I think the cable when I had it was out more then my Dish seems to be.

    Doug

  261. I have both by McSpew · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I recently bought a house in a neighborhood where "free" (i.e., subsidized) cable is part of what your HOA dues pay for. I pay nothing extra for "extended basic" cable from my local cable company. Because of this, my cable modem service is discounted by $10 per month, and I could upgrade to digital cable for $11 a month.

    However, I have DirecTV, and have had it for about 7 years now, and I'm very happy with it. I recently bought a couple of TiVo-integrated receivers, and the convenience and picture quality is excellent.

    I've retasked my standalone TiVo (formerly connected to a Sony SAT-B2 DirecTV receiver) to connect to the "free" cable. This TiVo has been upgraded to 193 hours of basic quality, so I record nearly everything on Best quality. The picture quality still sucks. The picture I get from my cable company is significantly inferior to what I get from DirecTV. Before my wife and I got married, she had digital cable in her apartment, and its picture quality was not as consistently good as DirecTV's is.

    I know that even by cable company standards, my lousy analog cable picture is abnormally bad. I also know that with Rupert Murdoch taking over at DirecTV, things are likely to go downhill in picture quality there. It's a tough call to make, but for now, I'm sticking with DirecTV and I'm not impressed with cable in my neighborhood.

  262. DishNetwork by SixArmedJesus · · Score: 1

    Before I moved, I had comcast cable. I wasn't thrilled with it, but I was even less thrilled when I found out how much just basic cable costs (I had been living with in-laws for a short while) When my wife and I moved out, we went with DishNetwork. It's been RARE for anything to happen with the signal. Even during those famous Texas storms. It might blink a little now and then, but never as much as eve the cable did back in Maryland. Plus, the features are MUCH better than cable. No more waiting (and missing) to see what's coming on with the scrolling TvGuide channel. I just type in what channel I want to see in the guide, and there it is. I can even see what's on for the next two days without having to go and get a seperate TV guide or anything. DishNetwork all the way...

    --

    *slight crashing sound*
  263. RCA + Lightning = No TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had DirecTV using the cheapo RCA receivers that they give away to get you to subscribe. Overall I loved it, but it would go out EVERY time there was a lightning storm. I have heard from others that this doesn't happen with better receivers, but I never had one around to test this theory. My system was professionally installed (also free) so I doubt that the problem was caused by a loose dish shaking in the wind.

    1. Re:RCA + Lightning = No TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Those "Professional" installers are contractors who are getting paid by the job, paid again to come back out if there's a problem, and rarely quality checked. I wouldn't discount the loose dish possibility quite that quickly. That's the #1 thing they have to go back out and fix, but nobody seems to care. (I recently wrote the equipment tracking software for one such contractor...) Fortunately, you can often fix the problem by simply going out and tightening the bolts holding the dish to the mast, and the mast to the mount. (If you've got a tall mast, they may not have buried your guy wires properly, which is harder to fix.) Or, call and complain and a technician will come out to tell you everything looks fine to him. He may or may not tighten the bolts for you while he's there. I'd be horrified at the lack of quality at that place if it wasn't pretty much the same standard as every other business I've consulted for.

  264. South by wurp · · Score: 3, Informative

    The reason all satellite tv requires the dish to point south is that the only way to get a geostationary orbit is over the equator.

  265. Satellite's failing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In every case where weather was blamed as a problem to signal, I've seen it repaired by realignment. Get as many of those transponders pinging as possible!

    Satellite (at least DirecTV)'s main failing, in my opinion, is its inability to allow local HD for local channels.. actually, sometimes when something local is broadcast in HD, the picture on satellite is horRENdous!

    DirecTV is supposedly addressing this on a case by case basis, adding local HD to markets one at a time.. but that's taking time. Comcast has HD on everything, crisp and clear, but I still hate them, so I suffer without for now.

  266. Comcast Sucks by EvlG · · Score: 1

    I had Comcast digital cable for a several years because I couldn't get Satellite until I moved into my house (no view of of the South in my apt).

    Their claims about picture losses are very exaggerated. Here is what I found when I had digital cable:

    1) Not all the channels are digital. They don't tell you this upfront, or at least, they don't make it clear. The local stations were analog and the picture looked only marginally better than broadcast. For some reason channel 4 always looked the worst.

    2) Outages were common. The excuse was always "we are working on the lines, etc..." Sometimes they would give me a service credit. At least once a month I would not have HBO or other channels available, for no well defined reason other than "we are working on the lines".

    3) Prices keep going up. The cable company raised my prices about 8% this year just before I moved, and I saw nothing from it. Just more of the same crappy service and not good channel reception.

    I'm moving to satellite as soon as I get settled into the house. Screw the cable companies.

  267. Comcast's crippled PVR scheme by mabu · · Score: 1
    Here's a good article outlining Comcast's plan:

    Subscribers will be able to watch "Trading Spaces," for example, but won't be able to see past episodes of network shows like "Friends" or "Everybody Loves Raymond."

    The service lets users rewind, fast forward and pause the programs they choose as well as store them for up to 24 hours to watch them at their convenience. It also lets viewers rent newly released movies for $3.95 each and other select programs for $2.95 each.

    "It's there at the touch of button, when you want it," Cleland said. "It also has the full functionality of a VCR."

    The company will roll the service out in Detroit next year.


    So you can watch favorite shows "at your convenience" ONLY if it's "convenient" for you to watch them within 24 hours of their original airing, unless you want to pay $2.95 to view it after that time, and that's subject to availability.

    TiVo negates the value of all that crap. This is why Comcast doesn't want its users running Tivo.

    So in essense, Comcast is going to force an inferior product and a more expensive service upon its customers and they'll have to deal with it.

    If there's anything positive that will come out of this, maybe Comcast's crappy DVR and mafia-regular-programming-PPV services will make consumers aware of the value of DVRs and then they'll seek out other cable and satellite companies that aren't trying to rape their customers with inferior services and higher prices.

    DirecTV is the way to go. It's cheaper than cable across the board, and I argue that cable is better quality than satellite - I think it's the other way around. I got a tri-LNB DirecTV setup with all the HBO and very cool channels like LinkTV and TechTV for $30+ less a month than I was paying for cable with less channels and only one receiver. DTV installation was $14.95 and I even got a free DVD player. On top of this, Comcast has one of the lowest customer-satisfaction ratings in the industry according to JD Powers & Associates, and DirecTV has the highest customer satisfaction rating.
    1. Re:Comcast's crippled PVR scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read a little closer.....The article describes OnDemand, which is a Video On-Demand product. The features are available through your standard cable service without additional equipment. Just in case somebody doesn't want to shell out $400 for a new box.

  268. Satellite all the way by arock99 · · Score: 0

    Better quality, more channels, cheaper. how can that be beaten? as for the signal loss thing, i'm in canada where we have snow storms (no igloos though!) and i only had loss of signal twice in the last 3-4 years. the signal loss lasted a couple of hours at the most.

  269. Side-by-side comparisons show Dish is better by countyroad265 · · Score: 1

    I'm currently a subscriber both to Dish and Comcast cable, and I was also an early subscriber to DirecTV. Dish is best, if you want access to the broadest range of programming, and quality is unmatched, even by good cable. Comcast here in Sarasota actually has more movie channels, but that's because they toss in some west feeds not offered by the satellites. They don't, however, have TechTV, CNNfn, or any out-of-market stations, which give you additional viewing options on sports events and syndicated shows, etc. The PVRs are life-changing, enabling you to skip 20 minutes of commercials per hour (!), as well as watch what you want when you want. You might also look at VOOM if you've got HD, but Dish and DirecTV are unlikely to let them stay ahead in that arena for a long time.

  270. Digital VS Analog by MarvinIsANerd · · Score: 1


    For me, weather is not a problem. Rain fade affects me perhaps a few hours every year. I have friends who have had their cable knocked out for longer than that. Just as long as you have your dish well aimed, you will not have a problem with clean signal.

    But the _real_ selling point for me is that with Sattelite TV *ALL* channels are digital. This means no noise in the picture. Sure you can get digital cable... but even with digital cable only _some_ of the channels are digital. The rest are still plain old analog along with noise. Currently I get High Definition DirecTV (5 channels HD) with the rest of my HD content off-the-air (local channels) and this setup gives me a better picture than anybody else I know, even people with Digital Cable (COX).

    Now when HD DirecTV with Tivo comes out, I would be completely content.

  271. Ice on the dish will cause signal lose... by plcurechax · · Score: 1

    I have found that ice on the sat dish will cause signal lose, and heavy thunderstorms at the uplink site (Toronto area I believe for Bell ExpressVu - BEV) will cause few outages for me over the past 1.5 years. Compared to cable outages, I'll take sat in rural Canada, thanks.

    The available bandwidth (due to numerous new satellites) at BEV means that they use lower compression and as such, you see little compression artifacts, especially compared to some of my previous digital (and analog) cable (CATV) companies.

    The cable set top boxes seem less powerful than the sat boxes, or at least I that it that is why I find that channel surfing much faster with sat then digital cable.

    1. Re:Ice on the dish will cause signal lose... by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

      Depends on the ice makeup. I had 3/4 of an inch of nice clear ice after the last freezing rain storm and no loss of signal. I have had a dusting (1/4 inch) of whitish mixed sleet and freezing rain and had total loss of signal (easily fixed by moving the dish off the near ground mounting spot the next spring). The loss was for only as long as it took for me to dust off the dish.

      Compression artifacts are actually getting more common on DirecTv as they spend more of their total bandwidth on HDTV (and during the peak winter sports season, action takes more bandwidth obviously).

      As the sats. increase the compression and space the I frames farther out, channel changes seem to take longer. However, if you flip to a sports channel or movie channel showing an action picture, then the I frames come more often. Switch to a cartoon and the I frames can be fairly far apart. Depends on content on DirecTv (and presumably Dish). Cable is more static in the definition of a channel and so should always be consistent. DirecTiVo boxes (and tivo boxes or other PVRs with tuners) may be doing housekeeping chores and may delay for that reason. And if you add a huge amount of disk capacity to your TiVo or DirecTiVo expect long delays in the "Now Playing" menu (entering, ocassionaly while in). There may be a hack for this shortly.

      I was really hoping the merger between Dish and Direct Tv would go through and then they could resolve the incompatible equipment issue by moving to MPEG4 (one can hope) and in the process gaining lots of bandwidth and reducing their sat ownership costs. W/o the merger there is no economic drive to replace the equipment in the field. DTV is almost MPEG2 based and Dish is MPEG2 based. Going to MPEG4 would allow all the current programming for both systems to sit at one "slot". The transponders most liekly don't really care about the format anyway. All the rest of their sat. assets could then be rented while they developed programming to fill them, or they could go HDTV on all the channels (with really good scan converters at their headends. Then downsample for the non-HDTV output of the boxes. The technology refresh would also allow them to eliminate the current holes in security that exist in order to support the generation one equipment. Depending on their budget (money spent fighting piracy, sat rental vs. ownership), maybe they should anyway.

      --
      - Tjp

      I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  272. All I want is a good online schedule by Stone316 · · Score: 1
    I dunno about satelite TV but with my cable digital box it has a decent on screen tv listing browser. The problem is, it lists every damn channel. I could care less about channels I don't have, I just want to see the schedule for the ones I do have without having to memorize if I am subscribed or not.

    Any services out there have a decent listing program like this?

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    1. Re:All I want is a good online schedule by Graemee · · Score: 1

      I've used a few Sat systems, US and CDN and all had some feature of selecting and storing favourite channels. My current allows for 4 groups. The only problem I can't save one as default. Dish allows this.

      When you have "500" channels it helps weed out the chaff and we all know how much there is of that.

    2. Re:All I want is a good online schedule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I could care less about channels I don't have, I just want to see the schedule for the ones I do have without having to memorize if I am subscribed or not.
      But then you don't see what you're missing on the other channels and call the cable company to order them. There's a reason they make you wade through all the listings, they're trying to sell you something.
  273. I'm on Cable by shreak · · Score: 1

    I use Time Warner Cable and it makes me sad.

    I had Dish Network a few years ago. The satalite digital picture kicked the crap out of the cable picture quality and cost less to boot!

    Due to my location and the location of my neighbors trees, I had to give it up. I cried.

    We signed up for digital cable (which had become available in the 4 years I was on satalite) which was comparable to the satalite digital. The cost was about the same as I was paying for satalite. Due, no doubt, to the competition.

    When we moved, I did a lot of research and I could not work out a satalite plan that cost less than cable for similar service (including access from 3 rooms and local stations). The satalite killer is the per box charge and the extra charge for locals. I could stomach the cost for local stations (they have to pay them), but I cannot understand $4 per box past one. What is the cost to them for my additional boxes? All they ended up doing was pricing them out of my house!

    I would love to give the finger to Time Warner, but I'm not going to pay extra to do it.

    BTW, For the same cost as Dish was going to charge me (without PVR -additional fee-) I was able to get the Time Warner Digital Cable AND DVR box. The Box is SLOW, but the service is SWEET! Better than my friends Dish PVR boxes.

    So the bottom line is: Thanks Dish, I loved you when I had you! And thanks again for forcing my local cable company to price competitavely. Lower your prices and I'll switch over a weekend.

    =Shreak

  274. Dish Network is Great! - Starband SUCKS! by gabrieltss · · Score: 1

    I have Dish network and Love it. I probably have had maybe 5 outages in over a year and a half. I get LOTS of cloud cover here is Nebraska sometimes and still get a great signal. We get 30+ MPH winds and still no signal loss. The keep adding channels and the price isn't too bad either. I wouldn't switch to cable ever, unless their quality went in the toilet! I have one of the 501 PVR's and their are nice! (Some hacks so you can transfer the video files to CD out there even! (Win2K needed though for the software.)

    Now, for internet Starband I would stay so far away from it isn't funny! (This is Dish Networks choice for Internet if you want it). ONLY get this if you have no otehr choice. I have had it for a year and a half ( no other choice catn' get DEL or Cable internet only 28.8K dialup way out in farmersville). Starband SUCKS! Their techs don't know their head from their ass and I have all 10 of their solutions on their scripts down pat! As soon as Qwest or Charter get DSL/Cable near me I am SO off starband! Starband charges $800 instalation fee!

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
  275. Picture quality? by Qrlx · · Score: 1

    Hi, I am not much of a TV watcher but I have a question about picture quality. This is kind of a mini Ask Slashdot.

    A few years back a roommmate had some sort of satellite TV (don't know which brand) and one of those hacked cards so we could watch everything. Notting Hill at 8, 8:30, 9, 9:30, and 10:00. Yes, they had five channels just of Notting Hill.

    Anyway, the channel selection was great, the price was even better (tee hee), but the picture quality itself was LOUSY. Especially in something like The Matrix, dark areas became HORRIBLY splotchy and pixellated. This I assume has to do with the compression used by digital satellite, something analog cable isn't crippled with. I have seen similar artifacts on digital cable systems of a few years back, but they weren't as noticeable. That may be because the satellite system I was watching was on the top of the line Sony HD projection model, and digital cable on some 27" JVC.

    Do these artifacts and such still exist? I found them incedibly annoying, to the point that if I were going to enhance my TV options, I would completely avoid digital in any form and stick with analog cable.

    Thanks.

  276. Bombarded by tons of commercials on cable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had Times Warner cable for a couple years. You pay these jokers a lot of money to get bombarded by endless strings of nothing but commercials. Usually there would be 8 minutes of program material, followed by 4 minutes of commercials, then another 8 minutes of program, 4 minutes of commercials,... etc , etc, ad nauseum. Never more than 8 minutes worth of real program material before commercials. This was on the Discovery Channel, History Channel, TLC, E!, hell even the Sunday Night Sex Show with Sue Johanson on the Oxygen channel was interrupted every 8 minutes by an annoying 4 minutes worth of mind-numbing commercials.

    It really sucks to pay so much money to watch 33% commercial load on all the basic cable channels.

  277. Have had satellite and cable. by wonky73 · · Score: 0

    I have had a dish network satellite hookup for about 8 months now. Before that I had cable. I have noly lost my satellite signal 3 times that I have noticed and they all lasted under 5 minutes. Also I only pay $25 a month instead of the near $40 I was paying for cable. To my untrained eye the picture looks better as well. I have a tv card for my pc and use that as a dvr so I don't know about the company provided ones. Since I can't really change channels using my card I would suspect they are better.

  278. Point that dish carefully! by Bloody+Peasant · · Score: 1
    Two points:

    1. If your dish happens to be attached to some structure that's liable to move over time (even on a timescale of months or years), you will notice exactly how much water vapour is in the air above you :-) This happened to me; the board the dish was mounted on had come slightly loose, and I was convinced some component had worn out. Even the slightest rainshower caused the signal to go on the fritz. That all went away when I spent 5 minutes re-aligning the dish. Now it takes an incredible amount of H2O in the air to impact the signal (no more than once or twice a year I'd say).

    2. I looked at dishnetwork vs. directv a few years ago, and noticed the latter was much more friendly to sports nuts. I'm not one of those, and dish had BBC America, SciFi, and the NASA channel in the package I chose so I was a happy camper with them.

    3. (OK, so I lied; this makes three points). Getting local channels if you live in the boondocks (like I do) sucks. You can't easily do it. Also, if you do opt for the "distant network" package and need exemptions from your local channels before you can get that package, be sure to only do this if you are committed to getting the package. Dish will assume you're going to proceed and will give you a hassle if you change your mind.

    --
    -- This .sig intentionally left meaningless.
  279. Satellite is better by pyite69 · · Score: 1


    Get DirecTV with the Directivo. The dual tuner
    option alone is worth it... and soon they will be
    releasing an HDTV version of Directivo (2Q 2004 is
    my guess on this).

    Cable and Satellite both have ridiculous amounts
    of compression though, but it isn't too annoying
    most of the time.

  280. Re:Tivo is fantastic, but doesn't work for everyth by MrBlue+VT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most places broadcast an analog signal along side the digital, so you might be able to just plug the Tivo directly into the cable feed and use the analog. This also saves unencoding MPEG and then reencoding it again. Analog is crappier sometimes, but I would think actually getting the correct channel recorded might be more important.

  281. you dumb shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you paste and quote the parent and STILL fucking miss his point? What part of HD-DVR did you not understand? Are you the dumbass that thinks he has HDTV when he really doesn't? The HD-DVR for Dish is very different from the HDTiVo (which will cost much more than the Dish HD-DVR, but the Dish one is crippled), both of which are worlds away from the DishPVR you have.

  282. Dish! by tabacco · · Score: 1

    Okay, I will go ahead and heartily recommend the dish. It's more hassle to set up initially, but it's a far better value. It costs just barely more than basic cable, but it comes with about twice as many channels (including some good ones, like TCM, BBCA, etc).

    And I honestly have no idea what Comcast's ads are talking about. I installed the hardware myself (since the guy who came out for the 'free' installation was stymied by the fact that my house has sloped facia boards and wanted to charge us $45 to come back out again after we'd bought him the stuff he would need to correct for that). Not including trips to the hardware store to get a couple of tools I needed (drill bits and sockets, mainly) the whole process took about an hour. It was misting lightly when I aimed the dish, and was about to rain, so you know there was good thick cloud cover. Despite that, I was getting signal strengths of 90-100 on many of the satellite's transponders. Even with heavy rain it stayed above 70.

    Just remember, a signal strength of 10 will give you just as good a picture as 100 will. I imagine it'd take quite a lot to drive the strength down to 0.

  283. I'll Never Go Back by puresqueeze · · Score: 1

    We've had cable for years, probably due to the fact the cable company succeeded in brainwashing our family into believing cable was so much superior to satellite. It wasn't until we moved into an area that cable wasn't offered did we start looking into satellite options. Well to make a long story short, I can't believe how much money we've wasted on cable over the years. Let me try to dispel any cable/satellite tv rumors based upon REAL LIFE experiences... 1. Immediatly, once we plugged it in, the first thing we noticed was that the reception was FAR superior to cable television... and this was accross the board, local and premium channels 2. On average, we'd loose the cable signal at least once a month and need to have the cable guy come out about once every couple of months. Well, here I sit looking at about 3 feet of snow outside and thinking about how many windstorms and blizzards we've been through so far this past year and our satellite has NEVER gone out. 3. Finally,,, thank GOD for PVR... did someone say Janet Jackson anyone?? So, what would you do.... the reception is better, its by far more reliable, you get to keep the equipment, and it costs less.... hummm what is there to think about??!!!! To borrow from a popular mag, satellite->wired, cable->expired.....

  284. Pros & Cons by donutello · · Score: 1

    It depends on what you care about. For me, that ended up being Comcast basic cable. For you it might be something else. Here are the factors you should consider:

    - Price: If all you want is a basic lineup, cable wins hands down. Once you add in the cost of the satellite dish, plus the fees for having your local channels plus programming fees for additional receivers, cable is a lot cheaper. If you want the "premium lineups" satellite and digital cable are a wash as far as cost is concerned.

    - Channel Surfing: If you like to channel surf like I do, satellite and digital cable can be very annoying since you have to wait at least 1 second between flipping the channel and it showing. Also, forget about PIP since your TV tuner can't tune into satellite or digital cable signals. Basic cable is the most friendly to channel surfing and PIP (which I can't live without)

    - NFL Direct Ticket: Only available on satellite

    - Channel Guide: The digital cable box caches the entire channel guide. The satellite boxes I've seen only cache part of it and you have to wait for it to download if you're trying to see what's on in a different segment than it has cached.

    - HDTV: You can't watch your local channels in HDTV via satellite. With digital cable you can and it's no additional cost.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
  285. Nickel and dimed away from cable by msblack · · Score: 1
    Those cable commercials claim that satellite companies will nickel and dime you to death. Untrue...satellite (with locals) is the same price or cheaper than cable. As others have pointed out, Dish reception is as good as cable and only the worst of stroms may cause a brief outage.

    I switched from Charter Communications (a Paul Allen company) to Dish after they dropped CPSAN-2 in favor of a 24-hour Spanish informerical channel.

    As for picture quality, satellite is a little worse than standard cable due to MPEG compression of the satellite transmission. This is particularly noticeable during very fast action or film credits on a black background. However, most cable companies are switching (have switched) to digital cable which also uses MPEG compression and suffers the same fate.

    --
    signature pending slashdot approval
  286. The Maine Story by carney1979 · · Score: 1

    I live in southern Maine. I currently have cable. I used to have Dish Network (in the one satellite days).

    The satellite was very clear, probably clearer than my cable is now (digital fed through fiber-optic runs to the pole, normal cable to and in the house).

    But at that time, I couldn't get local channels. I could get a Boston station, but that's an hour + south of me.

    When we had torrential rains (very rare in Maine) or medium to heavy snow falling (not rare enough), we'd lose the signal. The signal, being digital, was either all there, sharp as a tack, or no signal-no picture at all. To Dish Network's credit, if we were watching a pay-per-view movie and we lost the signal due to weather, we were ALWAYS credited and never charged for the movie/event, even if it was nearly over.

    We financed the first year as part of our package, and I was surprised when Dish Network wanted all the second year up front, no monthly payments possible. This is when we parted company.

    To be honest the loss of signal thing, though usually rare, is what would keep me from going back. Though rare, it always seems to happen during something you want to see the most.

    Cable is good enough for me for now.

    Best of luck.

  287. cable vs. satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About 2 years ago I switched from Mediacom cable to DirecTV. I would never go back! With DirecTV you get NASA tv as well as Tech tv in what would be an extended basic service for 39.95 a month. (along with many others!) The only reception problem I have had was last summer during a VERY severe thunderstorm. I have had no problems with snow and we receive quite a bit during the winter(central Iowa) Last year DirecTV started carrying our local stations so I dumped cable all together!

  288. occasional signal loss happens on both systems by notchcode · · Score: 1

    In Denver (home of Echostar), you do get the occasional satellite signal loss (like during a REALLY heavy snowstorm, the signal will get lost for 10 seconds or so), but my friends with cable often tell me about how their provider (Comcast, here) will inadvertently disconnect them due to a hardware upgrade, etc. for hours at a time.

    No problems noted with wind (could that just be a bad install job with the coax running from the dish to the house?), or 99% of the weather around here.

    So, I'd say go with satellite. You may get an occasional outage, but not for long.

    1. Re:occasional signal loss happens on both systems by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Many cable channels come from satellite feeds anyway. Funny to see which channels become pixelated garbage in heavy weather here, or sometimes in heavy weather in some other part of the country. And a couple times this year the cable went dead altogether for a few days.

  289. Pure crap from Comcast. DTV has been great. by raygundan · · Score: 1

    I've had my dish for six months now. We get severe thunderstorms, and the dish is currently covered in snow. I'd say it's about 2 inches worth of ice and snow, covering the dish and the feedhorn.

    I haven't lost signal yet. Ever.

    I did, however, lose my Comcast cable service roughly a dozen times over the two years I had it, once for two weeks. (And it took my internet access with it.)

    There's still time for DirecTV to catch up to Comcast's level of shit, but so far it's been fantastic.

    And there's no beating a $50 all-digital tivo with two tuners. Solved all of the "whose recording gets priority" arguments with my girlfriend, and we can record two things while watching a third prerecorded show.

    My only warnings: Make sure your installer does it right-- he needs to ground the lines. And don't let him drill through your shingles. That's just retarded. Your mileage will vary greatly on the quality of installer you get.

  290. My Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in western Oregon. Lots of rain.
    I've had both cable tv and satellite.

    The cable tv would be out about 8-12 days a year.
    I was worried about satellite, but when cable raised it's prices to higher than satellite I made the switch.

    With satellite, I loose about 4-8 days a year due to weather. And it costs less for a comparable channel package than cable.

    Around here, lower price, more uptime on the service, looks like satellite is the winner.
    But you may be in an area that doesn't have a local cable company that only cares about how much money they can milk from their customers instead of earning it through good service...

  291. DirecTV and Tivo is the only way to live... by archaic0 · · Score: 1

    My main problem with any cable company is inturrupting a program for sports, news, or weather (and the occasional non reason, just to inturrupt for the sake of doing it). Sure, those things are important sometimes, but DirecTV gives me hundreds of channels where that stuff is on all the time, so leave my regular scheduled programming alone! I can see the weather get bad and I'll check the weather channel if I want to.

    On a more technical note, most cable companies still use an analog carrier even with their digital programming. This creates a slightly less clear picture and is just tacky. DirecTV is all digital and I've never had a better looking picture.

    Although at times I've had weather issues with DirecTV (heavy rain is the only cause really, snow has never knocked me out) - my Cable internet has had 10 times more outages because of physical line issues where cable TV would have gone out as well if I had it.

    Lastly, I can't watch tv without a DVR anymore and DirecTV made that very easy to do. The reciever was only $180 and the subscription is only an extra $4 a month. With a cable version, the box is $250 and the monthly price is $13.

    There's my nickel... accepted everywhere Visa/Mastercard/AMEX isn't.

    --
    [ http://www.dvigroup.net/self ] ...where I keep my pennies and nickels...
  292. Go with satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. In my experience, I have lost my signal in extreme rain storms with satellite.

    I've also tried Comcast. Comcast disables the serial port on their boxes so you can't use TiVo via serial port. It still works with the infared blaster but I consider that to be a poor move. The serial port was disabled so they could push their On-Demand PPV crap. The problem with the infared blaster on TiVo: sometimes it misses a digit, and your show doesn't get recorded (because it is on the wrong channel). If the serial port was enabled, this wouldn't be a problem.

  293. Hated Dish by async8192 · · Score: 1

    We had Comcast (formerly AT&T Broadband) two years ago. I didn't like the cost (~$40) and the digital cable wasn't responsive. I despise commercials, so I tend to watch 3 or 4 shows simultaneously, constantly switching to avoid ads. It took sometimes 2 sec. to switch a channel.

    I was lured away to DishNetwork by 3mo. free, same price, and more channels. They had to install the dish, run cables from the dish, and I have to have a special receiver at each TV. With cable, I could at least watch standard cable in EVERY room, and only digital cable where I had a receiver. I found the picture quality to be *lower* with Dish, even after many technicians out to check the signal. It was visibly pixellated. Also, it would choke up *during* shows, while digital cable only seemed to choke when trying to change to the channel. Dish would also charge premium movies to our account during times we *knew* nobody was watching. They refused to block them.

    Anyway, I found our family was watching WAY too much TV with all those channels. We switched back to Comcast, got the basic cable (they don't advertise it, you have to ask specifically) for $13/mo. and subscribed to netflix for $20/mo.

    We now get a better selection of movies, get local channels and some of the cable channels (TBS, TLC, etc), pay less, and have no 'boxes' on top of the TVs.

    Also, with fewer stations, we often find ourselves thinking there's nothing good on, so we read a book or do something more constructive anyway.

    1. Re:Hated Dish by sadler121 · · Score: 1

      What does the basic $13/month package contain? I'll I rally watch nowadays is Fox News, History Channel, PBS, and thats pretty mich it. All these new channels really don't mean anything, and seeing that I hate commericals as well, I am more apt to scedule my DVR to record them and edit out the comericals. All in all I speend a LOT more time on the internet, (/. ;-) ) then anything else.

  294. ./er that doesnt need broadband? by goodbye_kitty · · Score: 1

    u "don't need broadband"? what on earth are you doing here...?

  295. quick Directivo vs. digital cable by Harlequin · · Score: 1

    I love my directv with tivo (and it has nothing to do with my roommate working for tivo). Previously, I subscribed to the Dish Network and it was ok. I'd take it over digital cable, but not over the directivo I currently have (I've never tried Dish's PVR). From my experience with comcast digital cable, the interface is slow... maddeningly slow. Going between the guide, descriptions, and shows takes forever. You can search the channel selections and prices to see what fits your viewing habits, but I'd recommend satellite tv over cable any day.

  296. DirecTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Ohio and DirecTV would cut out/severly degrade in rain and even moderate cloud cover. No matter how many techs came out to solve the problem. Even snow....sheesh. I have a clear view of the southern sky. And still service is unreliable. Not worth the buck in my opinion just yet.

  297. DirectTiVo by Parsa · · Score: 1

    Definitely get a DTV with TiVo. Dual Tuners so you can record 2 things at the same time. The weather isn't that big of a factor with satellite. During BAD storms you'll lose picture but it's got to get pretty bad for that to happen.

    J

    --
    Abiit, excessit, evasit, erupit.
  298. how about no TV by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

    GO READ A BOOK

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  299. DirecTV has no problems with San Francisco storm by BrianCarlstrom · · Score: 1

    We are currently having one of the worst storms of the season in the bay area and there is not any problem with reception.

    Buying a non-integrated TiVo is a bad idea. With integrated, you can use two streams at the same time. So you can:

    1.) record two shows while watching a third
    2.) watch a show while recording another
    3.) picture in picture

    As mentioned, the upcoming Hughes HD-DVR250 DIRECTV HD DVR which does HDTV seems the way to go.

  300. Season passes by mckwant · · Score: 1

    I've owned both, although the SA box has gone back to TW. The DVR has/d a similar function, but it broke constantly.

    If, for instance, you changed out of a recording that was going on, to watch something else (say, switching from a Simpsons episode you've seen 100 times to an NBA game), the future recordings under the TW's season pass would also stop at that time.

    That's just one example. I don't know if they've improved things over the 3 months we haven't had one, but that's the way it was.

    Just a note: I thought I would miss the second recorder ability, but I was wrong. Having two things worth watching on at the same time nearly never happens.

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
  301. My cable-satellite conversion experience by pfaut · · Score: 1

    In my town, we have Cablevision. We had one cable box and a second set connected without a box (translation: no scrambled content, even if included in our package, was available at the second set without the box to descramble it). We were paying about $55/mo. for extended basic + Encore and Starz.

    I had been a happy DirecTV DSL customer until they dropped that service but I wasn't about to go to them for TV due to their recent litigous nature. I looked into Dish Network instead. From what I could figure out on their website, I could get both TVs set up and end up with a bill within a few dollars of what I was paying Cablevision. In the process, I'd get both MSG and FSNY, local channels, 8 Starz movie channels, plus over 100 channels from the middle tier package.

    We've had our dish for about 4-5 months now. We're paying less than two dollars more per month for Dish Network than we were for cable and have twice as many channels and many more premium channels. Our reception has been excellent except for one night when we had heavy rain and extremely strong winds. We had no reception for about 20 minutes that night.

    I suspect that some of the war stories about poor reception are probably about people who installed it themselves or had someone that didn't have the proper equipment install it. I truly believe we had more outages when we had cable than we have since going to satellite. We'd regularly lose our cable in heavy rains.

    Dish Network also offers a TiVo equipped box for an additional fee. I don't know anything about it since we didn't get one.

  302. Comcast Guide = 24x7 Commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have Comcast with a ReplayTV DVR currently cause I live in an apartment with no view of the southern sky. I used to have Directv with Tivo. Now that I've had both I can say I miss Directivo dearly. Here are some of the problems with Comcast

    1) They have *THE* worst tv guide EVER! You can only see what is on tv for 30 minutes at most. (You know most normal guides allow you to see in blocks up to 1:30) Why only 30 minute blocks for Comcast you ask? Because Comcast has 3 different little banner ads on the tv guide screen rotating around. I think when we pay $60/month for cable we deserve an ad free guide. I really do not like this about comcast at all. The guide is basically useless.

    2) The Directv with Tivo comes in 1 box (receiver and tivo) and records directly off the Directv stream so you get the best picture possible. If you get digital cable with comcast you have to use a seperate box for Tivo/Replaytv DVRs. Why is this a big deal? Cause in order to change the channels on digital receiver to record shows, you need to use an IR Blaster, and in my experiences it works sometimes and sometimes not. Pain in the ass if your favorite show is missed because of this. Also on Comcast the picture has to get compressed to store it on a DVR and it loses more quality than with Directivo.

    Bottom line from someone whos had both Comcast Digital Cable and Directv, I can't wait till I move out of this apartment and can get Directv again. And dude, if you don't get the Directivo service you're really missing out. It's the best gadget I have, and I have alot!

    1. Re:Comcast Guide = 24x7 Commercials by necrosaro · · Score: 1

      this is true. you forgot to mention how comcast doesn't have dual LNB inputs. which means only on a directivo can you be recording two shows at once and watching a third previously recorded one. that is an amazing feature in my book

    2. Re:Comcast Guide = 24x7 Commercials by SurfTheWorld · · Score: 1

      On item #2:

      I found that the cable tuner boxes *always* lagged behind the quickness of satellite tuners. I'd press a channel and then have to wait for nearly 2 seconds between when TiVo hit the "done" signal for the digital cable box.

      Unacceptable.

      --
      Do it for da shorties
  303. I hate Comcast by mike3k · · Score: 1

    I live in a 276 unit (34 buildings) condo complex. Right now we have Comcast, but we're supposed to be getting a deal with DirecTV where they put one dish on each building if people want it.

    Until a few months ago broadband internet wasn't available here although we did have digital cable. BellSouth SlowAccess DSL is so bad that I would have considered switching to Comcast if they didn't also suck.

    Since Comcast started upgrading our service we've had very frequent outages, sometimes lasting several hours. On several occasions they also broke water pipes when they were burying cables. Last Thursday evening, the entire complex was without water for more than 3 hours.

    We pay $66/month for basic Digital cable with no premium channels, and it's missing a lot of channels I would like, such as the Sundance channel. DirecTV offers more channels for a lot less. I could even get two premium packages and still pay less.

  304. Re:Tech TV (OT) by CRYPTOFREQ · · Score: 1

    sure beats jersey. But it wasn't my decision, it was the us army's. Now its off to korea for a year. I'm looking forward to all the wireless access points I can find with my laptop and pda. I shudder to think that I'd have to live w/o broadband for a year!! I'd love to visit sanfrancisco!!

  305. My Experience With Insight by adamjone · · Score: 1

    I've been using Insight cable here in Indiana for several years, and I've been generally happy with the service. Growing up, our house out in the country did not have access to cable, so we had a DirecTV dish. During heavy rains, snows, and generally bad weather, we would lose our signal. We didn't mind so much, as we would usually turn off everything during a storm for fear of electrical spikes.

    We've experienced very little downtime with Insight. My wife is an avid television watcher, and keeps the set tuned most of the time we are home. Picture quality is very good, and the rates are almost identical to those from a satellite provider. One thing that I really like is that we don't need a tuner to pick up the classic cable stations on any TV in the house. With DirectTV, every set would need a STB to tune. With cable, as long as you don't want to watch HBO or some other premium station, you don't need any equipment. The equipment cost with Satellite can get quite high, even though most will give you the equipment for free now.

    Our bill is high, but it would be the same amount regardless of the provider we use. Here is a breakdown:

    HDTV/Digital/DVR Receiver: $13 per month
    Digital Package (basic and classic) $45 per month
    HBO and Showtime channels: $20 per month
    Broadband Access: $45 per month
    Discount: (-$10) per month (for having digital service coupled with the broadband access)
    After tax, a typical bill runs around $110.

    Since you mentioned that you are not interested in broadband access, you could get service for much less than we do, as you could eliminate the premium channels and broadband service.

    I receive a handful of stations in Hi-Def (NBC, CBS, ABC, HBO, SHO, PBS, BRAVO).

  306. decoder at the dish by async8192 · · Score: 1

    Dish actually has the decoders outside, on the dish! If you want 2 tvs, you have to have a dual receiver on the dish. The installer told me that If I wanted more than 2 tvs, I'd need two separate dishes. I can't imagine it is much of a technical challenge to put the decoder in the house, and split to the various rooms.

    What possible reason is there behind this?

  307. Re:Kill Your TV. No Simpsons? Mmmmm Lame by wondafucka · · Score: 1

    No Simpsons? No way. Nuff Said.

  308. Analog Cable for Me by DevCybiko · · Score: 1

    i have owned analog cable, digital cable, and digital satellite. i prefer analog cable. digital satellite: the cable ads are correct. you lose satellite signal during rain and snow. and you have to have the satellite sitting on a pole in your back yard pointing to a geosynchously orbiting satellite. digital cable: the signal is just analog signals converted for digital transmission to your house. so you still get fuzzy pictures. its not like youre getting hdtv. also you have to have a separate cable-settop-box for each tv in the house. analog cable: you get good reception and you can wire it all over the house for free. the only downside: the damn cable company requires you to wait by the door of your house until they arrive (sometime in a 4-hour period) and in some areas they insist on coming into your house and verifying that the connection works - which i believe is a violation of the FCC cable laws. currently: i use digital cable in the living room and analog all over the rest of the house. i got the digital bundled with high-speed internet for a low-low price.

  309. You need a phone line, right? by McLusky · · Score: 1
    Is there any way to use a DirecTV receiver with only a broadband connection? I was able to do it with my Series 1 TiVo and now the support is built in to the newer ones... here's hoping DirecTV is keeping up with the times.

    As much as I hate my cable company, I can't justify hooking up a land line just for DirecTV...

    1. Re:You need a phone line, right? by reiggin · · Score: 1

      Don't know about DirecTV, but DishNetworks no longer requires a landline, IIRC. I know they told me to leave mine hooked up for the first two days so that it could make sure it wasn't pirated or something like that but I don't know if that's mandatory for all installs. Either way, the only benefit of leaving it hooked up to a landline is that you can order PPV from the remote and access your account info also. Otherwise, you have to call in to order movies, etc. Which, btw, is subject to an additional $1 for phone orders. Just FYI.

  310. What I found by jhagler · · Score: 1

    I currently have digital cable but was interested in finding out what else is out there, so I have done a little research on this recently.

    First off, let me tell you why I considered changing, cost. We currently pay Comcast just over $60/month for their extended package covering everything but the movie channels. A couple of years ago we got everything we have now, plus the big HBO pack for about $55/month. You can see why we looked elsewhere. Do the satellite companies keep jacking up their prices like this?

    I found that a lot of the programming I like isn't available on the Satellite channels. I like Discovery Wings, but it's not on DirectTV, and I like the SPEED channel, but it's not on Dish Networks. Which one would I have to give up? However the Satellite networks all offered 3 room systems as a basic package, right now we're paying extra to have cable in our extra rooms. Also, I already have a Tivo so that wasn't a really big selling point for me either way. The biggest advantage teh satellite providers had was cost. They were in the $60/month range for TV in three rooms and getting HBO back.

    In the end, we decided that the hassle of losing channels we had grown to like, and having to change everything over wasn't worth the cost benefit.

    Just one person's take on it. Maybe one system will offfer you all the channels you want and you don't need three rooms, maybe you're in it to save every penny. Your call.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -RAH
  311. Real world experience from the rain soaked NW by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had horrible experience with cable back when DirecTV was starting up. I had the cable de-installed and the service man said "Well there are two choices for cable here, OURS or YOURS." I took the DirecTV boxes out of my car at that point and said "I'll take mine."

    I wouldn't ever go back to cable. I now have multiple DirecTiVos. The integrated receiver/TiVo is better in that it has two tuners so watch one, record two more at the same time is possible. Unlike the standalone, however, you can't record local off-the-air, or video in. It is generally cheaper than standalones as well, and the subscription may be moot depending on what channel package you order.

    TiVo is very hacker friendly (network options and upgrade disk capacity cheap and easy, and web access, etc.). DirecTv enables all the DirecTiVos from one master subscription. I originally choose lifetime, they've since made TiVo service free with most of the "packaged" services.

    Now as to weather. We get some severe weather in the Puget Sound convergence zone. I get maybe 2-3 minutes of bad (LOS) rain fade a month for the six rainest months. The signal on the spot-beam (local channels) has never disapperaed. I get occasional macro-block errors (looks like bad pixelation on part of the image) another 4-5 minutes a month. I could correct all these problems by going to a 1 meter dish now that the Channel Master "Gain Master" antenna is around. I didn't want to go bigger earlier because previous 1 meter dishes mounted a single LNB assembly (still dual channel, just points at one sat.). The Gain Master supports all the satellites. It should eliminate all the rain fade issues. I should also point out we are in a non-optimal position as a ridge with trees and houses blocks a portion of the sky where the sat. is. Cable is just not truthful. I have less outages now than anytime I've ever had cable and I am in a very poor site as far as the satellites are concerned.

    The last point is that regardless of cable or sat. you will lose signal twice a year for a few minutes a day for 1-3 days as the sun is directly behind the sat you are pointed at. For cable this is spread over a wider range as they point at multiple sats. DirecTv hosts the majority of their programming on a single "slot" at 101.5 degrees. However HDTV (and some other local and foriegn language programming) has program content at 110 degrees and NASA Select (and some foriegn language content) sits at 119 degrees. So to get NASA you'll need multiple LNB assemblies, but it is still one dish (although if you wanted the maximum signal strength with reasonable install and cost, you could point a 1 meter dish at each sat. If you are in a real fring area, like Alaska, there are 2 meter, 3 meter and larger dishes, or you can fixed mounth a C band bigger dish and mount the LNB to it. Hope this helps.

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  312. I live in Miami and Directv reception is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We get tons of thunderstorms in Miami and I've lost the signal about 2 times in a year and only for a few minutes. Those commercials are all BS. Also the dish is wicked easy to setup yourself. Just get a compass and follow the receiver instructions and it's easy.

  313. Tried em all by DroidBiker · · Score: 1
    I've had cable (Comcast), DirectTV, and DishNetwork. Here's my thoughts on each:

    Comcast Digital Cable: Had it turned off after 6 months. Only a few of the channels are actually digital and even those sucked. Static was somehow introduced in the signal before the digital encode step. The analog signals were almost unwatchable. The service went out from time to time. Lousy customer service.

    DirectTV: I had it for 2 or 3 years. It started out great, but over time they seemed to increase the level of MPEG compression (to add more channels is my only guess) and picture quality went down eventually becoming rather poor. I only ever lost service once for a few hours in a major storm.

    DishNetwork: Going on 6 months now. Similar to DirectTV in features. The PVR functions are very nice. Picture quality is noticibly better than any of the others (but still not great). Requires 2 dishes in my area rather than one to get all channels. My only complaint is that it seems a bit suseptable to weather. I've had it cut in and out in moderate weather. That could be my particular installation. Hard to say.

  314. Comcast commercials SUCK by Turd+Rippleton · · Score: 0


    If those comcast commercials aren't enough incentive to use Satellite, I don't know what is.

    ~Turd

  315. Neither by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just get NetFlix instead. You'll watch less crappy TV and maybe watch good movies. Or possibly just the Matrix, over and over and over again.

  316. Satellite/Cable In Canada by s15078054 · · Score: 1

    I have the Starchoice satellite up in canada (Red Deer, Alberta). We just recently had a hugh snowfall and temp of -50 C with winds. With all of that it was up 99% of the time, just like normal. I found no interuption due to weather. However starchoice is very behind in thier service and can't even keep up with Bell ExpressVu. I am switching to local Shaw digital cable with a broadband internet connection. This saves me alot of money, even with just the cable and allows me to have regular cable on any other TV's I want (I have 6 TV's in total). I find the service to be the same quality either way, and the signal around the same as well. Thats my 2 cents worth (want change?)

    --
    Steven Bengtson steven@mcomi.com
  317. Re:Kill Your TV. No Simpsons? Mmmmm Lame by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

    I own Seasons 1-3 on DVD, as well as the treehouse of horror eps.

    its about control. i dont have to be home at 8pm on sunday to watch the simpsons.

    --
    ... hi bingo ...
  318. Re:Directv beats cable, let me count the ways... by javaxman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Much of this has already been covered, and it looks like the clear answer from Slashdot is already "DirecTV beats Comcast Cable in every way", but since I have DirecTV ( have had it for years ) and my neighbor has Comcast digital cable, I think I can answer that DirecTV clearly wins on many points when compared to Comcast digital :

    1) Downtime much less than cable. Seriously. Although rain fade does happen, it's never for more than a couple of minutes even in the *most* severe of storms. It's a matter of *extreme* downpours causing some signal loss, not a matter of it going out constantly. Not a problem, really. A well-pointed dish and clear horizon help, too, but my dish is pointed right at a tree, gets 80% signal at best, and it's still almost never a problem. The cable companies lie, of course. When Comcast's cable goes out ( it definitely does happen ) it's for hours and hours at a time, not minutes.

    2) DirecTV has a _great_ program guide and lots of cool features built into even their most basic set-top boxes, *especially* when compared to Comcast.

    Comcast's program guide is hard to read, and worst of all, has HUGE advertisements that take up half the screen or more!! It's barely usable. It's just a channel with a scrolling loop. DirecTV's is actually an interactive program guide which is layered on top of whatever channel you're watching, it has _days_ of programming. See if you can find someone who has it and try it out- you won't need a TV guide ever again.

    3) DirecTivo is the best! Cable Tivos can't even tune two channels at once, and don't integrate with the cable set-top at all. DirecTV also offers their Tivos cheaply - you can get a complete multi-room system *with* installation and upgrade one room to Tivo for $99 bucks. Compare to $200+ for other Tivos. Also, probably since the program guide comes from DirecTV, the Tivo subscription is only $4.99, not the normal $12.99.

    4) More channels, more flexible channel packages, actually cheaper than cable in every configuration as well. If you're a sports fan ( I'm not ), DirecTV is where it's at, you may never leave the house again.

    5) Local channels are better quality. Maybe a small point, but someone who has cable recently pointed this out to me. I think it's because DirecTV charges $4.99 to give you locals and can sell them out-of-market ( I live in CA but could in theory get NY channels if I wanted to pay for them ). Cable _has_ to carry the locals by law and can't charge for them, so put the minimum of effort into doing so- they stick up an antenna wherever is convenient and give you that signal, which may well be worse than what you'd get on your own.

    Seriously, if you find someone who has DirecTV, especialy with Tivo, spend 15 minutes or so having them demo it for you, compare it to someone else who has Comcast digital cable, and you'll understand why the vast majority of posts here are singing the praises of DirecTV. I hate them for their evil smartcard lawsuit ways, but they're easily the best pay TV service around, and I'd rather be their customer and send them letters telling them how bad a mistake their legal guys are making on that front than pay a cable company who's even worse to their customers. It's much like picking a political candidate to vote for... and DirecTV is clearly the lesser of the evils.

    Almost forgot- this varies greatly by area of course, but Comcast only recently went digital in my area. On all fronts tech, HDTV rollout, everything, DirecTV has been way ahead of them. I'm sure there are more ways DirecTV is better than Comcast, and there _might_ be a better cable service than DirecTV, but I haven't heard of it.

  319. local channels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing to weigh when choosing between cable and satellite service is that your local channels may not be available to you when you get satellite service. You can get another metro area's channel in many cases, but some people do not want to watch Cleveland local news when they live in Kentucky (that's just a made-up example of course).

    I have lived in two state's capitals and in neither occasion was I able to get my local channels on satellite service, which surprised me greatly. This was important to me for informational purposes, so after the satellite service rejected my request to receive another metro area's local channels (I wanted to at least get The Simpsons every day, but they told me to go buy an antenna), in both cases I switched back to cable.

    Also, in my experience, the satellite dish was affected by strong winds, but those winds were not really frequent and were somewhat negated once I bolted the dish down extremely securely.

  320. Do Not Get Mini Dish or Tivo Get This instead: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had Mini Dish (DirectTV/DishNetwork)

    It worked GREAT- nice clear picture, etc. Until It was cloudy and stormy (which was the only time i really wanted to watch tv anyway).

    So I canceled that and got Line Cable. Not too bad. I had a spare less then $1,000 PC and hooked up with SnapStream.com's software and a tv card. And have never looked back.

    No monthly subscription, etc.

    Worked great for me. May suck for you. Or perhaps it never rains where u are. That is the biggest factor in this.

    1. Re:Do Not Get Mini Dish or Tivo Get This instead: by reiggin · · Score: 1

      You should have gotten your dish re-alligned. There is never interference with mine or my extended families dish (nearly everyone I know uses Dish or DirecTV if they have the choice) due to rain, clouds, storms, or snow. That sounds like an install problem. Cable, as others have mentioned, has way too much compression and artifacts as a result. Stay clear! I dumped Comcast Digital Cable in a heartbeat. Not to mention the outrageous price increases!!!

  321. Having had both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The claims of dropped signal are way over-exaggerated. We have lost signal a couple of times and it has been very brief (as in a minute or two). There has never been an outage lasting more than 5 minutes, nor has it happened more than once every three to 6 months.

    In fact, the dropped signal rate was comparable to outage time on the cable company.

    We found that Directv offered many, many more channels than AT&T (the provider at that time) for a lower price.

    I would use that as my criterion, personally, unless there is some kind of local problem that would cause more frequent outages. Who gives you the most for your money?

  322. Comcast totally blows by bizitch · · Score: 1

    I will soon be an ex-Comcast user now that I finally have a DSL option at my home.

    - The Digital Cable box is incredibly slow to surf
    - They keep up a "Chinese water torture" approach to raising rates.
    - Outages are a once every couple of months event (TV and Internet)
    - Customer service is incredibly shitty

    Good ridance ..

    --
    ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
  323. Satellite wins out in the end by drbill28 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've used both Comcast and Dish Network, in fact, I'm using both right now. Dish or DirectTVs digital channels are far clearer with almost no artifats in the picture. For instance, TechTV. On Comcast TechTV has artifacting out the wazoo. The bug on the screen looks like a puzzle that was put together wrong. On Dish, the picture is nearly clear. You should have few problems with the weather. You'll probabl-i lose your signal far fewer times than the cables goes out. If your Dish is mounted well, it won't be a problem. I remember the satellite installer telling me that there only needs to be 70% signal to have a picture. The picture shouldn't change at any signal level. So, either you have a clear picture or nothing. Our satellite has not gone out in several months mostly even with all the snow storms. It is actually not the clouds overhead that cause the signal loss the most. It's storms approaching or going through the signal path from a distance that make signal go out easier. Personally I would buy a standalone DVR like a TiVo. You can upgrade and replace the hard drive in it if you choose to. Well, if you're into hacking that is. I don't know how often the satellite or cable company will give you upgraded ones if you feel the need to upgrade. Also, if you plan on getting a HDTV sometime in the future. Doing research I found that cable companies also compress that signal a little. Dish does not do that. We have HDTV and we did notice that on cable the picture had some artifacing during HD programming. Barely noticable, but it was there. Programming, the only thing I will miss once the cable goes is the International Channel, the talk shows are hillarious. You get far more interesting channels on a satellite that cable just doesn't have. Comcast here has TechTV, and so does Dish and DirecTV. But Comcast has it in their highest digital tier. That costs $65/month! TechTV on Dish Network comes in the America's 120 pack. That's $35/month. The 180 pack is $45/month. and their give you a 1, 2 or 3 room setup for free. The programming pakages from Dish and DirecTV are virtually identical. Check out their sites and your cable company's site and compare them. I my opinion Satellite ends up costing about as much as cable in the long run. With programming charges for your receivers and whatnot.

  324. How about *no* TV - The BEST option. by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Thats right, when you move out, why dont you try living WIHTOUT television at all.

    You'll find you have more time for other interests and more time for new interests.

    Instead of lusting after a more broad connection to the collective conscience, why dont you try and understand your own? Television is a waste of brain cycles friend, resist the temptation to allow this device (and its programmers) to do your thinking for you.

    You sound like this might be your first place On Your Own (?), try moving somewhere urban and interesting. Live life, dont be a passive observer.

    Happily Television free for 4 years.

    1. Re:How about *no* TV - The BEST option. by mabu · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. However, I'd qualify this.

      I have a TIVO, and I don't consider it "television". It records just what I want to see and I can skip over commercials. I don't "watch television", I grab certain feeds that interest me and watch "video". It's a completely different experience, NOT to be confused with "television", which is CRAP.

    2. Re:How about *no* TV - The BEST option. by suntoucher · · Score: 1

      Yes, I totally agree. Spending $60-$100 for 300 channels of the same thing is a total waste. I personally haven't been able to go totally tv-free yet, the local broadcast channels have enough stuff, and I have replayTV, so I pretty much get to watch what I want when I want without commericals (This could be an IBM On-Demand Commercial). If you want movies, get Neflix. This, all in all, is a far better, and cheaper deal than cable or satellite service my friend. The best part about everything though is I actually started reading again when I went sans-cable. Did you guys know Lord of the Rings was a book?

    3. Re:How about *no* TV - The BEST option. by rtos · · Score: 1
      Hey, wait a minute... I know you!
      "Thats right, when you move out, why dont you try living WIHTOUT television at all. You'll find you have more time for other interests and more time for new interests... Happily Television free for 4 years."
      You sound familiar... didn't I read about you somewhere before? ;)
      --
      -- null
    4. Re:How about *no* TV - The BEST option. by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

      Thats right, when you move out, why dont you try living WIHTOUT television at all.

      As I see my GFs kid sister GLUED to Fox Kids TV, humming along to the commercials illegaly broadcasted into Norway, I made sure that I would never ever have broadcast TV in the house with kids. Ever.

      My uncle banned the TV in his house, and the result is very positive. The family talk a lot more than other families, they are engaged in more activites than other and the kids can focus on homework. Sure, they can pop over to a nieghbour to watch TV, but then they also interact more than at home.

      But I love films. I couldn't bear to be without my DVD player. So I'll get a tuner-less flat screen TV and a nice DVD player to go with it. Then the entertainment is provided, but with controllable brain shrinkage. And the only program I'll miss is Queer eye for the straight guy. Probably the best program since Futurama.

  325. Another advantage for DirecTV by angle_slam · · Score: 1

    If you're a big NFL fan, there really is no choice. DirecTV is the EXCLUSIVE proivder of NFL Sunday Ticket (where you can watch every regular season game) and the NFL network. Not just for NFL junkies, it's also for fans of out of state teams. E.g., you live in Illinois, but want to see all the Falcons games. With network or Cable, you're stuck with whatever the networks decide to play. With DirecTV, you can watch any game you want (unless it's blacked out in your local area).

  326. With DirecTV, you can always get a bigger dish by theycallmeB · · Score: 2, Informative
    I don't know how easy they are to find, but there are 3rd-party options (OR at least were) for replacing your stock DirecTV dish with a larger diameter unit (4+ feet in diameter). This would only be needed if you really want to watch TV no matter what the weather is like. My experience is that very heavy rain to blot out the signal. In fact, it performed very well through one of the worst snow storms in recent history in my home state of Oregon, or at least it did until the power went out.

    I also remember there being radio transparent plastic domes available to protect ground mounted dishes from the wind. So were even made to look like a big rock to conceal the dish for the landscaping gurus.

  327. cable vs. digital cable by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    Is the cable TV offering digital? In my area (southwest CT) we have cable that is a mix of digital and not. We tend to have more issues with the digital than anything else. Seems like it just can't keep up sometimes. The picture and sound on those channels is nicer, even on TiVo.

    I can not say enough good things about TiVo. A DVR is a god-send for those of us who are never home before 8 or 9pm. Added a 2nd hdd, and have never looked back.

    I have no experience of my own with a satellite system... but I don't like the dish thing.

    Good luck.

  328. No broadband needed? by Kwil · · Score: 1

    Screw cable.

    --

    That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

  329. Image quality by jmichaelg · · Score: 4, Funny
    weather really doesn't affect image quality (though this may not be true for HD content) but that airplanes, helicopters, birds and people falling off of your roof can and do.

    Yeah it really sucks. Just yesterday, last seconds of the game, kicker is going for the field goal and BLAM! some guy impaled himself on our antennae. Peeled him off but it was no good, the game was over.

    1. Re:Image quality by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Happened to me too.

      You really have to work fast. Leaving them out there too long, especially in the cold, and rigor mortis sets in. Believe me, there is nothing less pleasent in the world than searching through some guy's entrails for antennae components.

      Tip for you procrastinators out there: MRI's do a really awsome job of extracting metal parts from a cadaver. Unfortunately the force it exerts tends to smash the plastic bits.

      I recommends the chainsaw and microwave oven approach. Though I have to say, this is one of those cases where it might pay to just buy a new dish.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  330. Weather *Rarely* Affects Satellite by TrumpetX · · Score: 1

    I've had satellite for 2 years now. I've lost my signal maybe 2-3 times total during VERY HEAVY rains... We're talking monsoon style rain... It sucks when it happens, but I've had cable go out before in the middle of a football game for no apparent reason.

    No reason blackouts Weather related, rare blackouts

    1. Re:Weather *Rarely* Affects Satellite by JASegler · · Score: 1

      My experience is basically the same.

      I've had DirectTV for about 6-7 yrs now.
      During heavy rain/snow/etc it might get choppy or just cut out. And the occasional no visible reason blackout as well.
      But I'd put it on the order of 1-2 hrs total for a year.

      The only possible issue is that you don't get local channels (with the exception of a few select major cities). Personally, I don't watch network TV anymore so it's a non-issue for me.

      -Jerry

    2. Re:Weather *Rarely* Affects Satellite by adzoox · · Score: 1

      Weather REALLY affects cable in my area - every time the temp gets below 20 or the rain gets a little heavy the lines around here get wet - The thing about Satellite is that you call in and BOOM CREDIT NO QUESTIONS ASKED. You call the cable company and have to jump through a hoop on fire dowsed in gasoline to get a credit.

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  331. Happy with DirecTV, beware DVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I haven't had any experience with cable in at least 6 years. I switched to DirecTV before digital cable was offered in my area, and I haven't looked back. While DirecTV offered numerous services that weren't available on cable at the time, I hear that digital cable has caught up.

    I didn't re-adjust my dish since installation and never noticed any signal degradation in any kind of weather. When I got around to checking it this year, I noticed that it had drifted somewhat, but it took less than a couple minutes to nudge it back into position.

    The cable companies are claiming the wind can knock out your signal? I can't see that happening if you mount your dish on anything solid. Personally, I'd recommend just comparing programming packages between Dish network, DirecTV and cable to see who gets you the best deal for the channels you want. If it matters any, DirecTV and Dish have been bashing cable for their annual rate increases.

    The DVR though... I recently upgraded my old receiver to a DirecTV/TiVo combination unit. This is incredibly dangerous. I used to watch very little TV because whenever I sat down, there wasn't much interesting to see. The DVR sifts through all the channels, recording programs that I like by name. This means that whenever I sit down to watch TV, the DVR has collected 10+ hours of stuff I'd actually like to see. I never had a problem being a couch potato before, but now I have to resist the temptation to turn into one.

    Most of my coworkers have DirecTV now, but one of them uses the Dish network. According to them, Dish offers a cheaper basic programming package (although with fewer channels), but it includes a DVR (although it's not nearly as good as a TiVo).

  332. Answers in summary.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    Direct TV.
    Tivo.

    Cable bites. (accept my cable modem!)

    --
    Quack, quack.
  333. I have Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've nver used satellite, but I worked in an office for a couple of weeks and a few people were talking about cable vs. satellite and they were dumping satellite and going back to cable.

    I think TV sucks in general, but I had Comcast's digital cable (middle package) for a couple of years. Like the commercial suggests, they are rate hogs and keep increasing the rates little by little. I finally went over the cost versus benefit threshold and dropped my service to basic cable. Basic is cheap ($15 a month), but you don't get many channels. Howver, when the tech came to change it back to basic, I chatted him up and when he went to "re-program" the cable I was still able to get about 20 channels that aren't in the basic package. Another crap thing about cable is you can't record a show you're not watching. Maybe there's a wayt o work around that, but I was never able to do it (not that I even tried).

  334. Satellite. From a former Comcast Subscriber. by dgulbran · · Score: 1

    I speak from experience when I say that Comcast can bite me. They were the provider in my area too, and when I finally got fed up with service outages, poor picture quality, and ever increasing price hikes, I signed up with DirecTV and have never looked back.

    I had a Tivo before, with Comcast, and I never had any problems with it. But when I switched to DirecTV I picked up a DirecTivo and I've been *very* happy with it. We use the old Tivo on our second tuner in another room, but the DirecTivo can record two signals at once, while you are watching a previously recorded show (which as someone else mentioned, is damn nice!). It also integrates seemlessly with the program guide and PPV, so recording anything is a cinch.

    As for picture quality, I live in Chicago, home of snow and thunderstorms, and aside from when my _power_ has been out, I've *never* lost the satellite signal or had a problem with reception. In fact, the picture looks 1500% better than Comcast ever did.

    I don't know how DirecTV currently stacks up against Dish, but as far as satellite vs. cable goes, I say satellite all the way, and tell the cable mofos to stick the cable you know where... :)

    --
    The world won't end in darkness, it'll end in family fun, with Coca-cola clouds behind a Big Mac sun.
  335. Re:It's a marketing hype (Cable) - Cable BS by Havokmon · · Score: 1
    This is BS from the Cable companies.

    I wasn't sure myself until I saw their latest commercials touting I-Control over the 'hectic hassle of movie rental'.

    That put everything in perspective for me. It's one thing to totally FUD something only a few people have experience with (Satellite), it's another thing to try it with something common (Renting at Blockbuster). I think they're going to lose customers to Satellite now that they've shown how far they'll go to put the competition in a bad light.

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  336. DirecTV is suing its own customers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    forums.wumarkus.com DirecTV has filed lawsuits against over 22,000 defendants. Most are against former or current subscribers. DirecTV subscribers beware... Check the URL for more info. DirecTV is on the rampage and they don't care to check who's who. They're suing everbody.

  337. Re:Mr. Pot? There's a Mr. Kettle on line 2. by javaxman · · Score: 1

    Absolutely right. One Comcast cable-using pal of mine had his cable out for over 32 hours this past year. Compare that to 3 minutes of fade during a *severe* downpour, which I've seen once this year with DirecTV, and you realize the cable folks are spreading FUD because they just can't compete.

    What's more, they're still not used to competing. What happens when an artificial monopoly is exposed to competition? We're seeing it...

  338. Dish Network with the 3rd satellite by tz · · Score: 1

    It has everything including international channels.

    It has NASA and many tertiary channels (Discovery health, science). College course channels, NGO channels.

    There are two times a year the signal goes out for a few minutes per day (because the sun is directly behind the satellite). I've never noticed it though.

    A larger dish helps, but you need a really bad storm to weaken the signal to the point of loss - something a very ugly color on the weather map. Snow isn't very bothersome.

    I don't have problems, but in spring and fall I tweak the alignment of the dish, and the only other big thing is to keep the path clear - I had a tree grow into the path and reduced the signal - a laser pointer on a protractor with a plumbline helps - the beam was hitting the leaves.

    I've had far worse problems with (Comcast) cable, but I'm a long distance from the tap. Also they save money by using cheap coax that doesn't survive weather - the first few feet gets filled with water which becomes ice after a few years and the signal decays. With the center wire hanging down from a long length of cracked coax between the poles they were telling me it would be some high per-hour fee because "It is probably something inside your house".

    Even when cleaned/replaced there are channels that still look much better on the dish.

    Then there was the defective power supply that killed 2/3 internet packets on a warm day (I actually correlated packet loss with temprature) which took 2 months to find, and I couldn't use my internet during 11am through 8pm most days. Of course they would send the tech out at 10am so there was nothing to show. When I did, they replaced the cable-modem 7 times. They also would insist that I connect something (my iBook) with internet explorer to "prove to them" there was a problem although my linux firewall would show the lost packets. Beyond the 7 modems, every piece of coax and any other thing like couplers or amplifiers for about 1/4 mile toward that booster box was replaced - many twice. They finally replaced that box (which was overheating and adding noise but leaving the carrier or other test signals alone) and it worked. But that was internet.

    With cable, plan on being home for several multi-hour periods ("sometime between 1 and 4" which can mean after 5:30 in practice if they come at all) if you need them to do anything. Dish service isn't perfect, but has been far better than cable and I can generally do things myself since I own and can access all the pieces.

  339. Re:Tivo is fantastic, but doesn't work for everyth by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    Did you try adjusting how fast the Tivo tries to change the channels? I had to slow mine down a little...and then it worked perfectly!!

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  340. Satellite by hrld1,kon · · Score: 1

    I have used both DirectTV and DISH network satellite TV and have had cable in the past. I have had few problems with either service. If there is a thunderhead or similar type cloud between the dish and satellite, you will loose reception for a period of time. The most time I lost signal was about 45 minutes, when a tropical depression passed overhead. Conversely, when I had cable, I would frequently loose signal for several hours, in sunshine or rain. Cable is also suceptible to traffic accidents or the occasional cut loine by the local utility department when installing water, sewer, etc.

    --
    I have left looking for me. If you encounter me before I do, stop me until I arrive at myself...
  341. Re: tactics that look a lot like extortion by Grrr · · Score: 1

    Thank you so much for that last paragraph! Lest we forget...

    "Backed by a legion of lawyers and empowered by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, former FBI agents in the company's Office of Signal Integrity have staged raids against businesses that deal in piracy equipment, seizing customer lists and inventory with armed law enforcement officers as backup.
    ...

    Targeting pirates for their piracy is difficult, if not impossible, since receiving DirecTV is a passive operation. So instead the company is going after people like Sosa, who have purchased hardware from one of the equipment vendors shut down in the DMCA raids. Critics say that approach is misguided, and is snaring innocent hobbyists and security researchers, some of whom have never even owned a satellite dish."
    - Poulson's article



    <grrr>
  342. Cable customer here by EvilOpie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After reading the replies here, I see a lot of people who use satellite, so I hope I don't get flamed for being a cable user. But I'll just share a bit about cable TV from what I know.

    My cable provider is Time Warner. And I must say that they are pretty good. We only have a basic cable TV package, but that's good enough for me. Because of the increasing competition from satellite companies, they keep adding more channels. Most I don't even watch, really. I stick to around 5 hours a week or so of TV, so it's not a big deal. I don't have digital cable, so reception is good, but not perfect. I've seen both digital cable and satellite, and they are both better than regular cable. But heck, it keeps me from watching too much.

    One thing that cable TV is nice for is convenience. You just plug in one cable and you're ready to go. No cable/satellite boxes necessary. You want to add another TV, you just plug it in and hook up the cable and you're good to go. So that's always nice. And I have to say that Time Warner has been top notch for support. One call and they are out there fixing the problem. They even ran a new cable from the phone pole to our house to fix some bad reception we were having once!

    We also have our Internet access through Road Runner, which is owned by, of course, Time Warner. So even if we wanted to switch to satellite, we would STILL have a Time Warner bill for our cable modem. Not only that, it'd go up because we'd be doing without Time Warner to provide TV. So you really can't beat them for convenience in that respect either. And Road Runner's been nice to us. I can host my own web/email server off of it, and they have never complained. RR's support is pretty good as well, as long as you get past level 1 support. They are in Texas, and it doesn't help that I'm in New York. Level 2 support, which is local to our area is actually helpful. I see no reason to switch from them, considering we have no other Internet options aside from dial-up access.

    So I guess it boils down to the fact that cable TV isn't perfect, but it sure is convenient to say the least. And I don't know how much work setting up and maintaining a satellite dish involves, but Time Warner takes care of pretty much everything as far as the cable end of the setup is concerned. I've been pleased every time I've contacted them so far. (3 times total in being a customer for the past 6 years or so) If you need the perfect picture clarity, go for satellite. If not, go with cable. It's very easy to use and "good enough" in most cases.

    --
    -Through the server, over the router, off the firewall... Nothing but 'Net!
  343. How to Not Lose Signal by deathcow · · Score: 5, Informative

    Buy a bigger dish. Here in Alaska, 18" dishes wont even work. Minimal size is 30". Personally, we ended up with a 1.2 meter dish which is more immune to weather. (Our Dish network transponders vary from 60-80 in strength, with 125 on the spotbeam.) My friend went for the gold and bought a 2 meter dish. ChannelMaster makes all of these dishes for consumers to buy.

    Also, not sure how long your cable to your dish is? Buy some Belden 1694A cable, low loss serial digital interconnect RG6, and have it terminated with Canare F connectors on both ends. Doesnt make much difference for signals under 1 ghz, but can make a huge difference for higher signals depending on your existing cabling. I've ran my Dish on 350 feet of this cable with only a few points of signal loss on the highest frequencies coming from the LNB. (Check www.bluejeancable.com for a pre-made source of these cables. Or www.haveinc.com if you want to build it all yourself.)

    1. Re:How to Not Lose Signal by belloc · · Score: 1

      Here in Alaska, 18" dishes wont even work. Minimal size is 30". Personally, we ended up with a 1.2 meter dish which is more immune to weather.

      That's because the metric system works much better in Alaska.

      Belloc

      --
      I got more rhymes than Jamaica got Mangoes.
    2. Re:How to Not Lose Signal by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      RG6 is typically recommended for runs of less then 200 feet. For longer runs, try using RG11.

    3. Re:How to Not Lose Signal by deathcow · · Score: 1

      Agreed, agreed. It's just that I dont have the Belden and Canare parts to setup RG11 for it, and besides, much of that footage is the cable running around inside the walls of my house from the structured wiring center to the wall jacks where the rcvr connects. Running Rg11 through the walls would be a royal PITA. But for the outside part of the wiring, I whole heartedly agree.

      Parts would be:
      Belden 7731A, black
      Canare F connector: FP-C71A
      Canare Stripper: TS100E
      Canare Crimp Die: TCD-7CA

      That would be assuming you wanted to make the best RG11 cables :)

      The signal retention is impressive on that RG11. At 1.5 ghz, that 7731A loses 5.5 dB per 100 feet. Comparatively, that 1694A I mention above, which is great, great cable, loses 7.33 dB per 100 feet. That is nothing to sneeze at over several hundred feet!!

  344. I'll throw my $0.02 cents in... by papasui · · Score: 1
    Now being that I am a Network Engineer for one of the major US cable companies I suppose I am biased but I'll try to touch on the good and the bad of each...

    Cable - Good
    ------------
    Video On Demand
    (Awesome service, like having a movie store at your fingers)
    Subscriber Video on Demand (Same as above but content is based off of premium channels (HBO, Cinemax, etc.)
    Telephony (Voip is here to stay)
    DVR (Cable has them too, love mine.)
    Local Channels (Weather, news, school closings, community channels)
    Local employees (Most satellite companies don't have offices in your town.)
    Cable in the classroom (Cable provides free service to schools, and goverment buildings (police, fire, city hall))
    Local contracts (Your town signs a franchise agreement with the cable company stating the conditions the service needs to maintained in)
    Cable Modems (Do I need to say more?)
    Weather (Typically doesn't effect your service)
    Analog Channels (Just plug into the coaxial and you got service on all the tvs in your home.)

    Cable -- Bad
    -----------
    Outages (Not that it happens much, but it can and probably will. Sat. is a direct feed to your home, so if someone cuts a fiber 2 miles away it's probably not going to take your service down.)
    Oversold Nodes (Too many subscribers, too little equipment. This isn't typically a problem either but it could be)

    Sat -- Good
    -----------------
    Digital picture, digital sound (Looks good, sounds good)
    Get it anywhere (Don't need to be on the plant)
    DVR (Yep they got it)
    Price (It may or may not be cheaper, especially if you start tacking on all the extras. If you got all 500 channels its over $1000 PER MONTH!)

    Sat -- Bad
    -----------------
    Weather (Weather can and probably will effect service from time to time. Especially if you live in an area where it snows frequently.)
    Clear Southern Exposure (Gotta have it to work)
    Not upgradable (Invest now, if you want a new feature, gotta invest again.)
    Local Channels (Most areas still don't have this, you pay an extra $5.00 a month, and reception may not be as good as cables (some sat services use an antenna on the dish to get the channels.))
    Boxes needed (Each tv needs it's only box, and most dishes support 3 tvs. So if you have 4 tvs you need a bigger dish and 4 boxes.)
    Internet (22,000 miles makes for a LONG ping)

    Just my thoughts as I do this stuff for a living.

  345. The ads by TechniMyoko · · Score: 1
    I dislike how agressive the ads for cable are. They just blatantly outright say dishes suck, devoting entire ads to a singular reason.

    Ie: The one where they say you cant use dishes in multiple rooms with one box, then they go and release digital cable boxes that have the same flaw.

    Then there is the one about weather. I live in Canada, we get snow up the bageezus and it doesn't interfere with the signal that often

    And Dish signal is much better than cable. My TV guide channel is barely legible (it used to be on a clear channel but they got rid of it to get a staticier (s?) one)

  346. comcast by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    whatever you do dont get comcast(in brighton, Ma), i just got a letter saying that basic cable was only broadcast cahnnels and i was getting the other "basic cable" channels by error. A quick look at their site says basic cable includes a lot of other channles. When comcast was called the people said something similar to the website. The letter threatens to cut all but braodcast channels on march 2nd.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  347. DirecTivo Is 100% Your Best Option by Jakenuts · · Score: 1

    No doubt about it, in Long Island the cable company sucks (bad reception, ghosts, monopoly pricing) and DirecTV with Tivo built in (HDVR2) is outstanding. We don't even think about the TV and its care and feeding any more, just tell it what you want and you get loads of it in high quality video. Cable should be very scared.

  348. There is no question. by steak · · Score: 1

    I have used both dish network and time warner digital cable, and in my experience the less exspensive choice is best. Dish network gets new channels quicker, digital cable has on demand movies. Another answer is which ever one gives you a pvr for free is the best.

  349. Comcast's commercials are profoundly dishonest by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

    Here's the reality:

    DirecTV: You have a really bad thunderstorm. During the worst part of it, you lose your picture for about 15 minutes.

    Comcast: You have a really bad thunderstorm. During the worst part of it, you lose your picture. It comes back a few days later.

    Oh, and the one where the guy has only one satellite tuner for multiple TVs is pretty silly, too. Most people just pay $5 a month for an extra receiver for each set. Which is a nuisance, I grant you... but I had exactly the same fees when I was with Comcast, and that was with analog cable. (It was a two-line system, with almost all channels scrambled; you couldn't realistically use it without renting a box.) For digital cable, they wanted $13 per box per month! With most channels still analog!

    --
    Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:Comcast's commercials are profoundly dishonest by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      At least with cable you could get all nondigital channels without a box though. If I want to go directtv I would have to buy 3 receivers to give me service on 3 tvs. If I add a tv to another bedroom I have to go buy yet another receiver. Right now I only need one cable box in my main room, on the other tvs I just get all non-digital channels. And if I want to add another tv I don't need to buy anything but the tv.

    2. Re:Comcast's commercials are profoundly dishonest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this isn't necessarily true. My dish reciever had a radio frequency remote, which had the advantage of transmitting through walls. So since I would %99 of the time be watching Tv downstairs in the living room, or upstairs in bed, I ran a second out from the reciever to my bedroom. that way I got the same channel in two places with one receiver, controlled by the radio remote. I used the second receiver to control a third TV in my attic "rec room". (The remote on that one was tuned to a different frequency)

    3. Re:Comcast's commercials are profoundly dishonest by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1
      At least with cable you could get all nondigital channels without a box though.

      No, I couldn't. That's what I'm saying -- I had an all-analog system with most of the non-premium channels scrambled. You could not view them without a descrambler. What's more, my system was divided onto two lines. Without the cable box, you'd need a switch to view all channels. In practice, that might not have been such a problem, because on one of the lines, I'm not sure there was a single unscrambed channel.

      Apparently your system is better. You're lucky.
      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    4. Re:Comcast's commercials are profoundly dishonest by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Oh man...that does suck. I get up to around channel 60 something without a box. Everything after that is no go. But since most of the good channels are in the lower ones anyways its no big deal when I'm watching tv while on my computer or in another room.

  350. comcast is not so great.. by jCaT · · Score: 1

    I have had directv for 3 years now, and I never had any problems with weather or trees getting in the way of the signal. Granted I live in southern California, where 2 inches of rain is enough to make the news.

    As far as the ads where they show the morons adjusting the dish every day to get a good signal.. that's pure BS. I've lived in 3 different houses with the dish, and I've not ONCE had to re-adjust the dish once I put it up, even after being up for over a YEAR. Just make sure you have good southern exposure from somewhere on your house and you will have zero problems.

    Beyond that, directv's user interface and usability is WAY better than comcast. Navigating the program guide in directv is super easy, and it fits an hour and a half of guide for 8 channels on the screen at once. With comcast, you get an ad for TV guide that takes up 1/4 of the screen, an ad for a current movie that takes up another 1/4 of the screen, and whatever's currently playing this half hour on the other half of the screen. Not only that, but the remote is not ergonomic at all, and it's extremely frustrating to navigate through the menus with it.

    Signal quality? Well, directv is full digital for everything.. whereas your comcast is most likely a hybrid system, with all your locals and most of your basic cable as analog, and the additional ones as digital. You don't get the full advantage of digital quality for the channels you end up watching the most, which is pretty ridiculous.

    If you're at all considering tivo, get one of the directv/tivo combo units... you'll never look back. Because they're integrated into one unit, the signal stays digital all the way from the dish to the hard drive. There's no conversion to analog and then back to digital again, and then back to analog AGAIN to get to your tv! Suck. I bought the directv/tivo combo unit when they first came out, and you can have it when you pry the remote from my cold, dead hands!

  351. Is Television really so bad? by microTodd · · Score: 1

    I've noticed a lot of people in this thread saying how much of a waste of time television is.

    What about:

    - History channel
    - Discovery Channel
    - PBS
    - Home and Garden

    TV is not all crap. You just have to be selective about what you watch.

    --
    "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
    1. Re:Is Television really so bad? by suntoucher · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. If people could selectively purchase tv channels, this would be a whole different story. Unfortunely, you can't, and even basic cable is overpriced.

    2. Re:Is Television really so bad? by comrade1 · · Score: 1

      > - Discovery Channel

      Do you really need to know the mating habits of the barnacle?

    3. Re:Is Television really so bad? by microTodd · · Score: 1

      That's actually a really cool idea. I wish I could pay only per channel, say .99/month/channel.

      --
      "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
    4. Re:Is Television really so bad? by porcorosso · · Score: 1

      We do netflix ... you're around 1-2 seasons behind, but no commercials ...

      It's amazing how much you find yourself waiting for commercials to go to the bathroom and then suddenly realizing "crap! I can just pause it" ...

      --

      Silpon Designs
      Scented Paper Products
  352. here you go by geekoid · · Score: 1

    a) which one has all the channels you want?
    b) which one is cheaper?

    I had satalite, and it was greate, except when it snowed. Snow would stick to the dish. Fortunaly I live near portland oregon, so it onle snow once every couple year, usually for 3 or 4 days.

    Persoally, I got rid of satallite and cable because my kids seems to be watching it too much. I'll probably get it again when they're both in school.

    God I miss TV...

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:here you go by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Ah hell, I find the Internet wastes enough of my time. I used to sit around LOOKING for stuff to watch when we had cable.

      We are presently TV free. The wife want's to make an exception for public television, put I'm going to put my foot down on afternoon toons or cable/satellite. DVD's are fine. You can pause them, stop them, eject them, and otherwise choose what you are watching.

      Alright, maybe I'm just bitter because she won't let me buy that LCD projector for the living room...

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  353. My DTV vs Cable by Xannor · · Score: 1

    Here in Florida, we had timewarner (not brighthouse) cable for years. About a year after DTV came out we switch because of the "better picture" ads, and the quality was much better. At the time we still had to keep cable sicne we could not get locals and antenna was terrible where I live.

    Of course since we dropped to "Basic cable" they came out and installed these huge ugly filters on our line to prevent us from reciving anything above channel 11 (it was suppsoed to be 13 but 12 and 13 got fuzzed out by he filteres as well, but we did not care.)

    Once DTV got local channels and we switched from cable to DSL for internet, we dropped calbe entierly and have neve been happier. We now have 1 2d gen DTV Tivo and 3 (+ 2 1/2s) 1st gen DTV Tivo's (had some issues with two but managed to combine and rebuild thanks to the dealdatabase.com forum.)

    As for signal. If heavy rain is coming in fro mthe west coast of florida we tend to loose signal for its duration (of being heavy not for the entire rain period), but we use this as an early warning device to know when the rain will be heavy. Ufortunalty it is the opposite on those rare occasions that the rain is comign from the east instead.

    All in all, we are very happy with the service. There tends to be more of an initial cost than cable, but given how slow most cable companies are for fixing/replacing equipment, it is nice to be able to go out and buy new stuff if you "have to".

    --
    I sig therefore I am...
  354. DirecTV with TiVo (DirecTiVo) by DaveJay · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have DirecTV with TiVo (commonly called DirecTiVo), the dual-tuner box.

    I'm not a big fan of Rupert Murdoch, and he's either in the process of purchasing, or has already completed his purchase of, DirecTV. That said:

    1. I've had years of mostly trouble-free service. No (zero) outages due to rain or wind. Since I'm in southern california, I can speak to windy days and days-long rain deluges, but I can't speak to snow. YMMV.

    2. The problems I have experienced have been with the TiVo unit, but those problems have been so rare and so easily fixed (usually without calling tech support; I just go to AVSforums and check out their DirecTiVo forum for advice) that I can't say it's been anything but a delight.

    3. Once upon a time, I worked for a cable company. Having been on the "other side", I can honestly tell you that I avoid cable like the plague unless there's a compelling reason not to. There's always the possibility that the same kind of shenannigans go on at the satellite providers, but it's kind of like KNOWING someone spits in your food at a specific restaurant, vs. merely suspecting it at another -- you're gonna stop going to the first restaurant, even though you might or might not keep going to the second.

  355. Fox Sports World too... by PhosterPharms · · Score: 1

    I looked into satellite a few months ago after Cox upped their rates again, but after pricing out what I get for my digital cable plan on satellite TV, it looked like I was going to have to pay $20 or so more a month and not get Fox Sports World, one of my favorite channels (which may be a bit atypical for the Slashdot crowd, though I know there are at least a few Rugby fans here). FSW is not available at all on Dish Network, and is only available in the "Total Choice Premiere" lineup for DirecTV which is $89 a month. My advice is to look at what channels you watch, price out all options with those channels, and go with whichever one is cheaper. Satellite is (from my experience) MUCH more expensive to add channels to than cable, though the entry price is lower. TiVo is nice, but the money you save on cable will most likely pay for a TiVo over the course of a year easily. Of course, YMMV.

    1. Re:Fox Sports World too... by pumpkin13 · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you got your pricing on DirecTV, but you were misled. You can get Fox Sports World on DirecTV by getting the 'Total Choice' package, which is $34/month without local channels and $39 with, and adding the 'Sports' premium package, which is $12/month if you don't subscribe to other DirecTV premium packages (HBO, Showtime, etc). Your total cost then would be as low as $46/month. You can also buy a season package of Premiership soccer. I've had DirecTV since 1997 and there's no way I'd go back to cable. And yes, DirecTV has TechTV on channel 354 as part of the 'Total Choice' package.

  356. Re:Mr. Pot? There's a Mr. Kettle on line 2. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I ordered Comcast's cable internet service on top of my already existing full digital cable tv package (the one that costs about $100 itself), I came home from the place where you pick the cable modem up at only to find that my internet feed had been turned on.... BUT MY CABLE TELEVISION HAD BEEN TURNED OFF... so I had to call them up at 2am to get it fixed.

    Also, Comcast took over from AT&T in Portland. WHen they did this, they screwed billing up somehow. My parents had cable where they live. I wanted to get them cable internet access for TV. So, I caleld ATT (before comcast took over) and ordered it. I had it put in my name and autopay set up to take it directly from my account, even though it is at their home.

    This was all fine for about six months. Shortly after comcast took over cable in this area, They switched the internet account over to my parent's account without notifying either my parents ("hey, we're going to charge you $50 a month extra now, for this internet service that isn't even in your name") or *me* and then merged the two bills.

    On top of this, since nobody notified us of it and we have autopay, we never really knew that the internet bill wasn't being paid, until comcast called and said "we're turning your service off".

    So, we explained to comcast that "you had no right to take service from one person's name and move it into another person's name - nor were you to merge the accounts and bills -- and a note would have been nice". After an hour on the phone, they said they'd set up autopay again, split the bills again (for a nice $4 additional fee each month?!) and all would be back as it was.

    After two months this hadn't changed. We called again. They had no idea what we were talking about and said no ticket order had ever been placed for that sequence of events to occur. So we spent another hour going through the process on the phone, then waited... three months later and still no change.

    We did it again. Then again. Then we just gave up and accepted it. Then, finally, they split the bills. Well, not really. Now instead of using autopay to MY account to pay my parents' internet bill (which should be in MY name) and autopay from my parents to by *their* cable tv bill which should be in *their* name, they now send two seperate bills - one for tv and one for internet -- but still to my parents' address and under *their* name. For, you guessed it, the nice additional $4 per month. Lot of fucking point to THAT.

    So here we are, 18 months after the whole billing issue became a problem. And they still don't have it right. And I know plenty of other people that have dealt with this crap since Comcast took over, including people who had their internet service turned off, but were still being charged for it - and when they called the company to have it turned back on, were told "but it's already on" and then ignored for half a year before everything was finally settled and they were getting actual cable tv signal for their actual money.

    Comcast is one of the worst companies I have ever dealt with for ANYTHING EVER.

  357. Satellite tax by bluyonder · · Score: 1

    Maybe off topic but it seems that the cable industry is pushing referendums in several states to impose a tax on satellite services.

    On topic, I have Dish Network and I am happy with it. I do wish there were better programming choices (I'm forced to take the golf channel along with the rest of the "package"). They recently added all of our local channels, which is good because I live out between two large hills and only get one fuzzy broadcast channel.

  358. Another vote for Direct TV by Emperor+Skull · · Score: 1
    I've had Direct TV for about 6 years now and been extremely pleased with the technology and picture quality. Cable (Cox) is now available in my area and I subscribe for broadband access, but the picture quality on Cable TV is awful compared to DirectTV. There are a number of channels I get with basic cable (required for Internet) and I can easily tell if my wife is watching the cable or Satellite feed.

    I did make the mistake of mounting my dish on a 4x4 wood post set in concrete to get it higher off the ground. Heat and moisture would warp the wood enough to throw the dish alignment off. Once I went back to a metal pipe where the dish doesn't move rain fade is a thing of the past. About the only time it's been unwatchable in the last couple years was during a hurricane. (And cable was out long before and long after)

  359. Re:Mr. Pot? There's a Mr. Kettle on line 2. by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    And then there's Comcast's "Channel not available, please stand by", occasional dropouts on their digital cable, their "Dolby Pro Logic" label on the decoder (which only became available after they replace the box).

    One stupid argument is how digital cable is so much better than digital satellite. IIRC, both systems use MPEG-2, does anyone know what the actual quality levels are between the two encoded streams and transport method?

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  360. Mount your dish well by HaverOfPeculiarBox · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ther biggest problem you'll face with weather-related signal loss has to do with a dish that isn't solidly mounted. It takes a whole lot of snow, rain, or clouds to obscure the signal. The more common cause of signal loss is a dish that gets blown off its pointing angle, or one that wobbles in the wind. You can be as creative as you want with mounting (mine is tethered to the side of my brick chimney with two nylon ratcheting tie-down straps.) Just give it a firm shake with your hand (stfu) and make sure it's not going to wobble in a strong wind.

    As far as satellite vs. cable, satellite all the way. It's better service, better technology, and you'll be dealing with a far less scummy company.

  361. I had the same choice... by Loraque · · Score: 1

    And I went with cable. Part of my choice was because I prefer cable to DSL, but I would have gotten cable anyway, and here is why I chose that way-

    1. I have an HDTV. I want to watch HD. I can either get DirecTV and get HDnet and HBO/Showtime, or get DISH and get CBS/HBO/Showtime. If I go Comcast, I get all the locals except for ABC, now in HD (Fox, CBS, NBC) and ABC will likely follow soon for me. As well as HBO and all that. Cable has Sat beat right now for HD content, at least in the case of Comcast, and at least in the case of the networks. I don't care much about PPV HD.

    2. Cable does not require me to install anything on the outside of my house (townhouse), which I have to get approval for WHERE the dish goes and whatever. They can't REFUSE me, but I do have a hassle.

    3. Dish would have been cheaper. That is true. Would have to pay extra for the local channels. I also would have had to install either multiple dishes (E*) or one larger than normal oval monstrosity (D*). HD requirements again, multiple satellites, etc.

    4. HD equipment costs a ton for Sat TV. You are talking ~$500 for a receiver, cheapo one, not counting the nifty newer ones. I get an HD cable box from Comcast for free... well, $5/month. Upgrade whenever I want too, if they come out with a new one.

    5. WAF (Wife Approval Factor) considerations. It is hard enough with a receiver remote, TV remote, cable remote, for the wife to know which channel to turn to for what. "Flip it to channel 113 for the Superbowl honey... we want to watch that in HD, not channel 4." That would only get worse with the HD receiver/DirecTivo setup I would have had with Sat. Switching input options on the TV also would have been too much for her to deal with, and I don't care to have that conversation. Again.

    Bottom line is, cable is less hassle, Sat gives more options. If you can get Comcast or Time Warner cable though, then you are better off with cable if you want HD. Soon though, that may change with Sat and new sattelites, but I doubt getting all the local channels in HD will happen in Sat... you will get one for your timezone at best.

    HD is starting to look bad for Sat now that the big cable guys have passed them up.

  362. DSL Limitations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rufey didn't indicate as much, but keep in mind that DSL is limited by the distance from your location to the phone company's switching station. It is possible that Rufey's new place is just far enough to make DSL impractical or just not worth the expense.

    I bring up the point because it's likely he has an existing DSL account that he wants to keep. I was in a similar situation (started DSL, moved too far away) and the solution was to lease a cable modem and downgrade the DSL account to a no-frills dialup account. A quick call to an knowledgable sales manager confirmed that I could continue to use DSL account's SMTP and POP3 servers, which is basically all I use it for nowdays.

  363. Weather by Natchswing · · Score: 1

    Have seen my share of weather problems with the DirecTV. The whole picture goes out and you get "Loss of Satellite Signal" for a few minutes until the storm passes. Annoying but still better up-time than cable.

  364. Use satellite whenever possible by heroine · · Score: 1

    It seems to be cheaper than cable. Cable goes up 5% every year and daytime reception is non-existent as they're constantly taking down the network to reconfigure individual tenants. Of course, most mortals live in north facing apartments so we can't have satellite and don't have much flexibility in dish positioning.

  365. No complaints with DirecTv by dummondwhu · · Score: 1

    I've had DirecTv since it was virtually brand new. I can't think of a negative thing to say about it.

    The weather outages are virtually a non issue for me. It only seems to happen during heavy snow or during heavy thunderstorms, and its typically not for longer than a few minutes. It happens maybe a few times a year, that I notice. I can't recall ever having an outage for any other reason, which is more than you can say for cable.

    Another thing I have to say, is that customer service has always been outstanding with DirecTv, in my experience. You can pretty much do everything like pay the bill and change programming online these days, but in the few times I've had to call, the service was good and they didn't treat me like I was wasting their time (another area where cable lacks in a lot of cases).

  366. sattelite disruption by Lurking+Grue · · Score: 1

    When my local cable company calls to ask me to switch from Dish Network to digital cable, they frequently cite the "bad weather" problems that satellite subscribers can experience. I politely remind them about the "good weather" problems that I've experienced with cable. I've been with Dish for nearly four years now, and I can honestly say that their service has been far better than any cable company I've ever dealt with.

  367. DirecTV vs. TW Cable in upstate NY - Rochester by hadesan · · Score: 1
    I have to agree with the others that the cable companies claims of signal loss are generally more BS than fact.

    I have had DirectTV since early 1996 (BTW - I lived in an apartment at the time and had the dish on my balcony) and will never give it up. The satellite picture quality is far above cable (even digital in my area) - with an occasional artifact (very rare). I purchased a 57" 16:9 TV and the local channels (which are cable - I have Road Runner) come out fuzzy compared to the DirecTV signal. If you think about it, where do most cable providers get their signal from? Satellite...

    The choice of stations is also far beyond cable. You get East Coast and West Coast versions of most major movie channels (HBO, Cinemax, Starz!, etc.) as well as uncommon channels (Sundance, Independent Film Channel). It was also one of the few stations which carried BBC America, FX and SCI FI until the cable company picked some of them up as well. Cost of these channels from the cable company is usually around $50+ more than what you pay for from DirecTV.

    Here is a program listing of channels available:
    DirectTV Programming Options

    I updated my satellite receiver to a Sony SAT-T60 DirectTivo a few years back and this thing rocks! With a little linux "magic" and Google searching you can have a large MPEG recorder that allows you to dump shows to your PC for editing (bye bye commercials) and burning to DVD or CD. The satellite signal comes in digital format to start so no analog to digital conversion is needed. You can also record two shows at a time or record a show and watch another...

    The only downside was the lack of local channels in some markets, but this is being addressed for my area and local channels will soon be carried.

    As for blackouts, does not happen unless you screw up the dish setup. As long as snow or rain or ice do not build up on the dish (which it shouldn't if mounted properly - you don't lose the signal, even in heavy storms.

    I will never use cable for anything other than Internet access. I plan on upgrading to a HD DirectTV for the HD signals when a decent HD DirectTivo unit comes out.

    BTW, if you have kids - there are always good kid shows on the Family Channels (Noggin, PBS Kids, The Science Channel, Nickelodeon, etc.)

    BTW, if after all this you buy cable, tell them you are considering getting satellite cable instead and they will most likely cut you a good deal on your subscription costs...

  368. DirecTivo better quality than Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had digital cable with a stand-alone Tivo, DirecTV with the stand-alone Tivo, and DirecTV with a DrecTivo. First, the digital cable was not really digital. Only a few dozen channels were digital. The other 100-some channels, the ones you use more often, are regular analog cable. DirecTV is better in that everything is digital, even your locals. As for the Tivos. It's better to have the DirecTivo. If you have a stand-alone with DTV, the signal is decoded to analog by the receiver and then re-encoded by a consumer-grade encoder in the Tivo, then decoded again to your TV. The DirecTivo has no encoder as it takes the satellite signal directly and decodes it only when it goes to the TV. Thus, you keep the quality whether watching live or recorded. The dual tuners are great, too, as others have said. I used to think how did I live without Tivo. Now, I think how did I live without 2-tuner Tivo.

  369. What about VOOM? by reiggin · · Score: 1

    What I want to know is, has anyone here had VOOM satellite service in their home? I've seen it at Sears (AMAZING hdtv signal) and I've been on their website but I'd like to hear from some actually users of it. Anyone?

  370. Sat v. Cable by Y2 · · Score: 1
    How much does the weather affect the signal quality of satellite TV reception?
    Aside from local broadcast channels, how do you think the Cable outfit gets the signals they send down your wire?

    From satellites!

    I drive past the local cable baron's antenna farm every workday. They use bigger dishes, so they can withstand a bit more rain fade, but I do see weather-related signal loss on their system. Often it looks just like the problems in the FUD ads they show against satellite TV.

    --
    "But all your emitter and collector are belong to me!"
  371. What about FREE TO AIR satellite??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I cancelled my ExpressVu almost a year ago because they kept raising the minimum package price and had just added a 2.99 "system access fee" (read stealth inflation) to my bill and that was it. One option was to go antenna, I have one but I only get 5 stations (CBC, GlobalTV[like fox], CTV[like CBS], TVO[like PBS], and CKNX[WB/UPN content, a local independent]. Most of what I like is on FOX and Global didn't come in very good for me, so I had to look at something else, so....

    I had been experimenting with Free-To-Air satellite TV for a while before that and decided to go ahead and take the plunge. See www.lyngsat.com for more information but here is the gist:

    FREE SATELLITE TV!
    Get a DVB PCI card for your computer and make it into a tivo AND don't pay for TV. On Ku band with a motorized 90cm dish you can get: ABC (1 affiliate), NBC (1 affiliate+net feeds), FOX (3 affiliates), WB (2 affiliates), UPN (4 affiliates), PAX (5+ affiliates but PAX sux), a few news channels (Fox News, MSNBC, Bloomberg and a few others), NASA TV, and tonnes of news/network feeds, foreign channels, religious channels, etc. But suffice it to say you can still watch the Simpsons and other staple geek television. Upfront cost about $350 for a 90cm dish, receiver, and motor. Substitute receiver for a similarly priced PCI DVB card (make sure Diseqc 1.2 support to move the dish, and that it will work with whatever PVR type linux software you're going to use!)

    If you can put in a big C band dish you can usually get them for free and that gives you even more "real" TV including but not limited to, most networks in the Alaska time zone, TechTV, Independent Film Channel, Fox Movie Classics, CNBC, another NBC affiliate, CBC Newsworld International, CTV network feeds (Canadian tv network), ASN (another Canadian TV station that carries a lot of WB/UPN type content), TVU (a Christian MTV of sorts if you like that kind of music) and lots more foreign channels, feeds, shopping channels, and religious channels. Upfront cost: a big C band dish, actuator (motor arm thingy), dual-band LNBF -- all that you can usually get for $0-$150 from someone who thinks there isn't anything to watch on it anymore [they probably have an old analog/videocipher system] and they've switch to directv or whatever, $300 for a Satcruiser 2040ACE (does Analog [Techtv, ABC East/West, wildfeeds, etc) to move the dish and decode the DVB signals, a couple splitters and a 2 port diseqc switch to go between C and Ku band digital and away you go.

    YMMV, but to me I get more than enough TV, all my favourite shows I used to watch, and no monthly bill. I invested about $500 Canadian into my system about a year ago so I'm probably at the break even point now vs paying for a comparable package on expressvu. If you live in a city or real close to a city an antenna might be fine, especially if you can get good digital OTA TV which is available in some large markets in the US, but I'm at least an hours drive from even the smallest city so satellite was the only way for me if I wanted a decent selection.

    BTW, in Europe Free-To-Air is basically standard and almost all channels are available that way, have a look at Lyngsat.

    Hope this helps...

  372. What is this TV thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frankly I'm surprised, I know the Slashdot crowd doesn't like piracy but come-on you guys you supposed to be geeks! I'm not rich like the guy who has satellite with cable as a backup. I pay 20 a month for my broad band access and have a copy mlMac for file sharing (it is a Fastrack, Gnutella, Soulseek and mlDonkey client). When I hear about a tv show that is pretty good I download it. For news I find the web is a much better source or broadcast news has what I want locally. I recently discovered that I really enjoyed the West Wing and Family Guy. So I cued 'em up and watch them when I feel like it. If I see an episode and I can't wait for the next one, that's fine its right there. Oh, and no commercials. I thought that was why people got broadband until this post "I have DSL and I need Cable or Satellite" why?

  373. Three simple observations... by jag164 · · Score: 1
    I had Comcast digital cable in PA and it really sucked. MPEG artifacts, lost channels for minutes at a time, poor receiver (worst user interface ever)

    I had Time Warner digital cable in Austin, TX. Excellent. Never an artifact or dropping of channels.

    I lived at a place in NJ with DirectTV. Good. Few dropped signals, but never for more than 30 seconds.

    I currently have comcast digital cable in NJ. Same situation as in PA, but worse. A few times a week at random moments (especially during a critical point in a movie), ALL channels become the Home Shopping Network for a two minute span. Very annoying. Lots of MPEG atifacts, three seconds to change a channel, and the channel lineups have changed three times in the past 4 months.

    Moving to atlanta soon, going with the b/c only comcast is available.

    moral of the story: Avoid Comcast

  374. Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rain fade almost never occurs when properly alligned. "ALMOST" It does happen and will continue to happen. If it didn't happen the satelite companies would have commercials saying, weather doesn't effect our signal. Satellite is nice but it is affected by weather.

  375. Satellite wins for me by stevel · · Score: 1

    The FUD about satellite reception going out often is just that. I switched from cable to satellite three years ago - the cable signal was much LESS reliable than satellite, and would go out for hours at a time even when weather was good.

    Initially, I had Dish Network, but switched to DirecTV with the integrated TiVo. I live in snow and ice country, and I rarely lose signal. When I do, if ice builds up on the dish, I clean it off with a broom out the window and it's fine. In most climates, you won't get "rain fade" with a properly installed dish - if it is a problem for you, you can get larger dishes that give a stronger signal. I have yet to lose the signal once this winter.

    My cable provider (Comcast) increases rates twice a year - it most recently went up 28%. I do use cable for the cable modem, and, due to Comcast's screwy prices, it's cheaper for me to get basic cable (and not use it) than not.

  376. Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I moved to dallas and got comcast cable and high speed internet the internet is great but the cable sucks i would much rather have direct tv. We continually have problems with loss of picture. It comes and goes where as a dish that is tuned properly even if self installed only has trouble when it is a terenchal down pour. I have had more problems with my cable is 5 months than in my 3 year run with Direct TV. I would greatly recomend Direct TV over any cable provider any day.

  377. Re:Kill Your TV. No Simpsons? Mmmmm Lame by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

    Well yeah. That's why the world needs Tivo, and/or Video On Demand.

    --
    "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  378. No Taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may not really care because it may be peanuts, but satelite is usually tax free, where Cable often suffers from the addition of local and state taxes. Some states are starting to try to tax satelite TV, but until they do that difference could be worth a PPV movie or 2 per month. Just my 2 cents.

  379. Oh no, it's raining by realinvalidname · · Score: 1

    In suburban Atlanta, we typically have a rain hard enough to knock out satellite about 3-5 times a year. Outage is typically 10 minutes or less.

    Previously, we lived in an apartment 10 miles south (ergo, roughly the same weather). These same rains were perfectly capable of knocking out the cable for days.

    In short, the cable companies are lying - satellite handles adverse weather conditions better than cable, in my experience. Of course, how much would you expect from a government-enforced monopoly like your local cable system?

    Also, nothing is as cool as DirecTiVo.

    -realinvalidname
  380. I'm firing Time Warner this week by smalloy · · Score: 1

    I had DirectTV installed last week, but kept Time Warner around until this week because we wanted to see the Super Bowl in Hi-Def, and didn't get a hi-def receiver from DirectTV (we're waiting for the HD Tivo units).

    So far, DirectTV is superior in nearly every way to Time Warner cable in Austin.

    We've had a standalone Tivo unit with a digital box from TW for a while now. DirectTV is cheaper, has better picture quality, better sound quality, records 2 shows at once, and doesn't suffer from the problem where TW reboots the cable box - leaving it powered off - and Tivo records several hours of a black screen.

    Not to mention that Tivo via DirectTV is $5/mo, and it's $13/mo for the standalone.

    Cable companies are trying to spread FUD with their anti-satellite commercials. Some people may have problems, but for us at least, satellite was definately the way to go.

  381. what I've seen by drteknikal · · Score: 1

    If you are comparing analog cable to digital satellite service, don't -- there isn't any comparison.

    If it's digital cable, bet a complete channel map for the cable and satellite options, along with pricnig, and compare.

    I compared my digital satellite (DirecTV) to my girlfriend's digital cable (Comcast) and found that she got about a dozen video and about 20 audio channels I don't get. On the other hand, I got about 20 video channels she didn't. Quality was about the same for both, but selection and pricing differed.

    I seldom lose my DirecTV service due to weather. Torrential downpour with thunderstorms can knock me out for 5-15 minutes, usually less or not at all.

    Also compare customer service. My cable company people are bastards. The DirecTV people are nice and easy to work with. YMMV.

    Finally, look at the cost of equipment. Most of the satellite receivers are given to you cheap with a year-long subscription to almost everything, while the cable boxen are usually leased for a monthly fee. You have the option of buying your own satellite receiver to get the features you want.

    If it's DirecTV you're considering, ask if HDTV and DVR matter to you. With DirecTV, you can get either, but not both, in one box right now. With cable, you can get both now.

    --
    http://drteknikal.blogspot.com/
  382. Cable for me by techstar25 · · Score: 1

    I was in the same situation. I just moved also. Two reasons why I stick with cable (Brighthouse/TWC):
    1. No phone line.
    I did not get a local phone line because my wife and I were able to get two cellphone lines for less money. Local phone is $50 per month here in Florida. Dish requires phone(at least thats what the website says). I use an RR cable modem anyway, not DSL.
    2. Rent the hardware. Don't have to buy it.
    In my house I lease a DVR box and a HD box from Brighthouse. $8 per month per box ($96 per year, per box). Satellite would require that I purchase a HD receiver($300) and a TIVO($200) which a lot of money to drop, plus they likely will be obsolete in a year. If my leased box goes obsolete, or breaks, I just ask, and get it replaced for no extra charge.
    It was a no brainer, especially since the cost of the programming tiers are essentially the same, offering the same channels in the same digital quality. As my coworker pointed out, however, DirecTV does offer the NFL Network and has an exclusive deal to offer NFL Sunday Ticket. But this is slashdot, so who cares about football here anyway?

  383. Sattelite TV by zelphior · · Score: 1

    From my experience with Sattelite TV, signal quality depends a lot on where you are in relation to the sattelite. At my cabin in upstate New York, we get great reception, even in storms, because we are on the top of a hill, with a large valley around, and a great direct line to the sattelite. In Boston, however, there are several tall buildings between my dish and the sattelite. The signal is usually pretty good, low artifacting, but rain at all, even heavy cloud cover, knocks off my signal completely. Usually I'll get a few blocky images at best during a good storm.

    So if you are moving out into the country, I'd recommend sattelite (probably easier and cheaper than running cable out to your house in some areas), but if you're moving into a city or anywhere there is not a good line of sight to the satellite, then go with cable.

    --
    If you can read this then I forgot to check "Post Anonymously"
  384. Charter by ManuelKelly · · Score: 1

    I have Charter, not Comcast, so YMMV. For the last several months they have had problems with their equipment at the local office. I still have analog cable. The DA converter in their office for Bravo is bad. Lots of tileing, complete loss of souce/picture... I have had many calls to customer service. They are not local, and their only option is to schedule a service call to my house. The day of the call the local office calls, tells me it is not at my house, which I already know, that they are having problems in their office, and expect it to be fixed soon. I have visited the local office a couple of times also, and they know about the problem, but apparently cannot fix it for one reason or another.

    They have also changed the channel lineup without notice fairly regularly.

    I am seriously thinking about switching to satellite, but I have a couple of problems. My wiring isn't up to satelite standards, and I have five connections.

    I rarely watch the talking heads on the local channels, so not getting them would not be a big deal, and the satellite offers many more movie channels.

  385. cox digital cable and pixelation by gmr2048 · · Score: 1

    i've got cox digital cable in the DC area, and pixelation is horrible at times, particularly on the odd HBO channels (HBO2, HBOF, HBOC, HBOWHATEVER). i don't seem to have problems on the main HBO channel however. i haven't been able to tie it to the weather or dog sneezing or anything particular. but it should be illegal for them to flame satellite reception when theirs is so bad (at times) too.

  386. I like dish by 56ksucks · · Score: 1

    I prefer the dish. Preferably the Dish Network. Even though you may loose the signal when it rains the quality is much higher than cable. And even digital cable can go out if the satelite at the cable company gets blocked by a cloud or a cable falls off a pole. The difference is you don't have to wait for a repair man to fix the cable. You have the dish and you have the digital signal pumped directly to your box. Not only this, but on digital cable, the first 99 channels are not digital. They're analog. It's not until you reach channel 100 do you start getting the digital channels. Every channel on the dish is digital. I'm not quite sure why people worry so much about getting local channels through the dish also, I mean they're local channels, you can turn the dish off and pick them up with an antenna. The type of antenna that snaps to the back of the dish works just fine for that. And you might be able to get a reasonable package that includes local channels. But honestly, I'd rather have around 5 crappy channels with 300 digital channels than 99 crappy channels and maybe 100 digital channels. And no matter what people say cable is just as fragile to weather as the dish. There are miles of cable that can be blown down, and interference and neighbors who steel it from you.

    --

    ---- "Excuse me. Where's the children's gun section?"

  387. Cable TV is Satellite TV too by clusterix · · Score: 1
    Cable companies as always are being little weasels in spreading FUD to defend their monopolies.

    Cable companies get their digital sources(if they even have upgraded to digital) from similar flat panel high frequency satellites. So if rain effects yours, it will effect theirs. Snow does cause some problems if it builds up on 'the fake rock', but if it is in an open area (no trees in the way). It should be unnoticeable as digital is actually pretty tolerant to bad signals. I know most small town US cable TV is still using large dish analog feeds which are more prone to sun spot problems.

    On a related note, the closer you are to the equator, the more likely your signal will suck and therefore be effected by rain, sun spots, etc. This is true even for digital low orbit satellites as they only cover specific areas of high user density.

    In Singapore, our starhub cable has many outtages due to the sun and rain interference (it is illegal for consumers to have satellite receivers here so censored cable is the best we can get). The signal is definitely digital, but I suspect that to even get this crappy of a signal in this region it is something other than a flat panel dish. Most telecom dishes in this part of the world are gigantic(40+ feet) to reach the northern hemisphere parked satellites. Even to reach Australian (Murdock TV) positioned satellites must take effort. It is equally bizarre in that many of the viacom, hbo, news channels are locally originated in S'pore for Asia.

  388. "If you're too stupid for the dish!" ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have something important to say, but I have to rant a bit about those stupid commercials.

    Basically what comcast is saying is "If you're too stupid to setup the dish, there's always cable!"

    Those comcast comercials are really trying to reel in the stupid people. If you ever watch any of the commercials and pay attention, it is apparent that the people in them are incredibly stupid. It's just like infomercials, where the always have a retard using the competeing products.

    They guy who takes a rickety bookshelf and some cinder blocks to prop up the dish, after they told him to put it in concrete. He replies, 'I live in an apartment, where am I going to put concrete?', so he tries to think for himself, and we get the destined to colapse bookshelf. Had he only listened and just put some concrete in a bucket he would hav ebeen just dine. Just goes to show, some people are just better off not trying to think for themselves.

    There's another one with the guy who sells the dish, if you pay attention there's a shot of the two poles that are supposed to go inside on another, and he taped them together side by side with duct tape! IDIOT! No wonder it doesn't work well, it's probably not eve pointed in the right direction!

    That being said, there is one instance where comcast is superior, if you only want basic cable and internet, but don't want to pay for both. By hooking you up to the network, you get basic regardless, so you needn't pay the additonal $50 or so.

  389. Dish TV vs Comcast by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    I agree that comcast customer service is poor, and you had better watch their techs like a hawk and do a QA test on everything before they leave. However, barring having any technical problems I find cable TV far superior to dish tv. I have had both (I live in Philadelphia). Dish TV would go out on numerous occasions (bad weather or good weather) it would just go. Sometimes it would go out in one room, sometimes in both, sometimes for a few minutes and sometimes for days. When the service was brand new Dish network's first answer was to charge us (literally) and we didn't even have the service for a month. They will not install any wiring in your home (they will lay the cord in the middle of your hallway). I prefer comcast. I hate their service reps, but as long as i do not have to deal with their CSR's (generally i do not once the service is setup) it is a beautiful thing. The highspeed also beats DSL by far :) Hope that helps, Avi

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  390. DirectTV = SCO = RIAA = MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All four operate the same way, low on revenues, sue the consumers. Go with digital cable, the only outage I had is when they accidentally capped my line.

    I paid DirectTV for all the possible channels for two years and then received a threat letter from them for buying a smart card programmer which I had legit use for. They said they didn't care and I had to pay them $3,500. I told the to crew off and cancelled my shody service. I was a loyal customer until then.

    I lost signals in every thunderstorm, snow storm and on heavily overcast days. They also kept blocking channels I was being charged for.

    I am extremely happy with digital cable and never plan on going back.

    int27h

  391. Satellite: Dish Network or DirectTV by KojakBang · · Score: 1
    I had Dish Network for about 3 years when I decided to switch to DirectTV (because of their Tivo promotion).
    I've now had DirectTV for about 6 months. For about $50 (plus about $30 shipping) I received an integrated DirectTV w/ Tivo (HDVR2) which allows you to record two shows at the same time.
    With BOTH Dish Network and DirectTV I did NOT have problems with rain fade, wind, etc. I live in the Seattle area and with the rain we get I just don't lose my reception.
    I do like DirectTV better than Dish Network mainly because of the integrated dual-tuner Tivo (although I don't like the menus as much as the PersonalTV from Dish Network).
    Also, at least for me, with DirectTV I only have to point at one satellite. With Dish Network, I had to point at two. What that means is that with Dish Network I did have to tweak it quite a bit to get BOTH signals above 85% so that I would never lose reception during wind/rain storms. With DirectTV, I get over 90% and have never had any issues at all with reception.
    I also have noticed that my local channels (Seattle) are more clear than with Dish Network (less compression) but that may vary with region.
    Oh, with DirectTV they have a great package (Total Choice Plus Locals) that's about $40 (a bit cheaper than Dish Network with locals).

    I've never gone back to cable and have been 100% satisfied with Satellite (especially with the dual tuner Tivo built in).

    My $0.2

    --
    "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence."
  392. DirecTV Rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, one year ago I bought a new house. I called Comcast and wanted basic+standard cable and internet. They told me that they would have to charge me for installation unless I signed up for Digital Cable because they were running a special (free install + digital was only $1 extra for like 3-4 months). So I signed up. Here's a recap of some of the things that happened during that year:
    - My "free" installation showed up on my first bill as $90.
    - After many calls to customer service, many empty promises and blatant lies by reps and managers I finally received a $90 credit.
    - When my promotion ended, they went back and charged me extra for the previous month (even tho they'd sent me a bill already for that month and I paid it)
    - They didn't send me a bill in May, June, July or August (yet continued to charge my account) --- note: I *still* have not been able to get my August statement from them.

    Anyways, before I get too far off topic, I switched over to DirecTV and haven't looked back. I opted for professional installation (free when I bought my dish). The installer told me that most signal problems come from bad (ie, DIY) installations. I have 99% signal quality most of the time (you see pixelation/lose signal below 75% I believe).

    I've had DirecTV for about 6 months now. I can only recall 4 times when I lost signal (the longest was 2 minutes I believe -- that was during the hurricane). The other 3 times it was 30 seconds. I experience much longer outages when I was with Comcast.

    I still have Comcast Internet because Verizon won't give me DSL (they say I live too far away). I'm hoping internet-over-powerlines catches on, otherwise someone needs to come out with Internet-over-water. Heck, I'd settle for internet-over-sewage (although I guess they'd have to shift binary from 1's and 0's to #1's and #2's).

  393. Re:Directv beats cable, let me count the ways... by media_Assassin · · Score: 1
    Comcast's program guide is hard to read, and worst of all, has HUGE advertisements that take up half the screen or more!! It's barely usable. It's just a channel with a scrolling loop. DirecTV's is actually an interactive program guide which is layered on top of whatever channel you're watching, it has _days_ of programming. See if you can find someone who has it and try it out- you won't need a TV guide ever again.

    Just to be clear - this is only true of Comcast's non-digital cable. Comcast digital cable has exactly as you specify above - multiple days, no ads, interactive, and you still watch your current channel while browsing the guide.
  394. clarification of correction by raygundan · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can use a normal standalone tivo with any source. A dedicated satellite tivo (currently) has several advantages over using an SA tivo for satellite, though:

    1. No need for any sort of control cable or "IR blaster" or serial connection to make your standalone tivo control your cable or satellite tuner box.

    2. Two built-in tuners. Record two shows at the same time, while watching a third that you've already recorded. This is freaking fantastic, and I hope we start seeing 2-tuner SA tivos as well.

    3. Pure digital recording. With a DirecTivo, it records the digital stream straight off the satellite. If you use an SA tivo and a satellite tuner box, the stream gets decoded by the satellite box and then re-encoded to mpeg by the tivo. You'll see quality loss.

    Anyway, just wanted to lay it all out. An SA tivo works with everything, and is truly in its element with analog cable. A DTivo is fantastic and has several advantages, but is can't be used for anything but DirecTV.

    1. Re:clarification of correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one nice thing about a SA tivo is you can set the recording resolution to 720x480 and 9.X megabit.

      then when you pull off the video, its already dvd compliant. (you have to resample 32khz audio to 48 though).

    2. Re:clarification of correction by raygundan · · Score: 1

      I fiddled with that on my old series 1, but MAN did it eat the disk space. Still, it's doable. And I think some of the DVD-burner/SA Tivo combo units do this already with their high-quality modes.

    3. Re:clarification of correction by vanyel · · Score: 1

      Although the DTivo can't record off the air, you're better off getting the local channels over it anyhow, unless you get really good reception on all of them. And I think you'll still get better quality over the satellite, as even good over-the-air has more interference than the occasional glitch from rain (which at it's worst has been a couple seconds of typical digital compression/dropout artifacts for me). The two tuners are really worth it too, and often, it's actually cheaper than any other Tivo (Best Buy and others frequently have them for $100 w/year or two service requirement, but what else are you going to do with it?)

    4. Re:clarification of correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An SA tivo works with everything

      Whats a SA tivo? Is that some new model?

      Ohhhh! You mean Standalone.. Gotcha. Too hard to type standalone more than once eh? Just gotta make up some new acronyms, dont you..

    5. Re:clarification of correction by DonGar · · Score: 3, Informative

      I agree with the poster about dual tuner Directv TiVo being amazing, but there is one problem.

      The latest wave of cool features for TiVo, such as the home media option, boxes with DVD burning, etc aren't available in Directv versions. It's not a technology problem, but Directv won't allow their release (at least not so far).

      On the other hand, the HD Directv TiVo will be out soon, and will only be for Directv (at least for the moment), though it does receive ATSC signals.

      --
      plus-good, double-plus-good
    6. Re:clarification of correction by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      One other advantage of DirecTivo - storage space!

      Because it records the direct compressed signal off the dish, it makes MUCH better use of storage space.

      A normal-capacity standalone box only gets about 8 hours of recording time at the highest quality setting (which is still worse than DirecTivo since you are recompressing). DirecTivo gets pretty much the advertised 35 hours with full quality.

      Why is this, you ask? Simple - the folks at DirecTV have MUCH better equipment available for doing the compression of the shows. Remember, they only have limited satellite bandwidth, and better compression means more channels to carry which means more subscriber fees for pay-per-view, etc. (They also take advantage of low-detail frames in one channel to free up bandwidth for high-detail scenes playing at the same time on another channel.) They don't just have a dinky chip that they could get for $40 doing their compression - and for non-live shows they can presumably compress the show in non-realtime for broadcast later. A standalone Tivo has to do the best compression it can with very limited CPU power and memory.

      DirecTivo gives you the same quality as you see off an ordinary box, with much better use of disk space. My father had a standalone unit with DirecTV - there is no comparison. Especially when I saw him having to carefully negotiate with the family the meager quota of shows that could be recorded at high quality.

  395. Re:How about *no* internet - The BEST option. by Yosho · · Score: 1

    That's right, when you move out, why don't you try living WITHOUT internet access at all?

    You'll find you have more time for other interests and more time for new interests.

    Instead of lusting after a broader connection to collective conscience, why don't you try and understand your own? The internet is a waste of brain cycles, friend; resist the temptation to allow this device (and its webmasters) to do your thinking for you.

    You sound like this might be your first place On Your Own (?); try moving somewhere urban and interesting. Live life, don't be a passive observer.

    Happily Internet free for 4 years.


    I fixed your post for you! There was a lot of incorrect punctuation.

    But seriously, a while back I noticed that I wasted a lot more time on the internet than watching TV (yes, with a cable connection). Then a two-week long DSL outage occured; at first I thought I was going to go insane, but since then I've found a lot more free time for other activities, such as reading books, practicing Aikido, and learning to make chain mail.

    At least television is passive, so I can work on something else while idly paying attention to it; the internet demands that you pay full attention to it while you waste your time.

    --
    Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  396. Comcast might not have NASA tv by crazymennonite · · Score: 1

    In my area (Delaware) Comcast does not have NASA TV available. I know it is available on the various satellite services.

  397. It's all about DirecTivo by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    The DirecTivo is by far the best deal in TV. The killer part is that it records the exact signal from the satellite to disk. It's already a digital signal, so it's very easy to just store it. A regular Tivo will take analog input and digitize it using a $20 encoder, while here you record what the DirecTV $10k (wild guess) encoder produces at uplink. The bottom line is that DirecTivo gives you perfect picutre quality with no compromise.

    Dish has its own similar PVR system, but it's much more primitive than Tivo. You can find people saying it's just as good as Tivo, and the thing they all have in common is that they've actually never used one...

    It can also record two shows at the same time. While you watch a third recorded one, if you so wish.

  398. Cable KILLS! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Funny
    I ignored all advice of the 'un-obstructed view of the southern sky' and installed my dish myself. It's pointed directly at a huge tree branch about 20 feet away. My signal strength hovers at 96 percent, and I've had two outages due to (really scary) weather.

    (I live in southern Minnesota, where tornados like to play.)

    Our local cable co. called a month ago, and was trying to sell me on cable. They said, "What about when the weather is bad?"

    I said, "When the weather is bad enough for my satellite to go out, the last thing on my mind is catching the end of "Iron Chef". I get my ass in the basement. I hardly want to die watching "Friends" reruns on cable."

    She didn't really have a response to that. Guess it wasn't in the script.

    1. Re:Cable KILLS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, DirecTV goes out in heavy fog, and severe rain. I guess this can be explained by line of sight obstruction. What I cannot explain is why my cables system goes out regularly.

      BTW, while DirecTV has occasional problems when using the "standard" (aka smallest) dish, the larger dishes seem to completely eliminate the problems.

  399. Happy DishNetwork user here by Lomara · · Score: 1

    I'm very happy with Dish Network. Comcast is the only option in my neighborhood, and is probably $20 more per month for basic service. A ripoff. Weather is not a factor for me, as I am in the Los Angeles area. I took advantage of the free equipment/free installation Dish is offering until Feb 28. So I got the receiver/DVR option which has a 100gb hard disk. It's been great and I see why everyone loves TiVo so much. Now I'm just waiting for someone to figure out how to extract video from a DishDVR. Bottom line, the cable adverts are bullshit. Dish/DirecTV seems to have the better value nationwide as far as packages go.

  400. dishes support 3 tvs? On what planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dishes support 2 TVs general (dual LNB). HDTV dishes support 4. No dish supports 3.

    Cable PVRs generally suck (Explorer 8000). It is theorized the Comcast one won't, but it is vapor so far, so who knows?

    VOD isn't real on cable or satellite. Both can start shows very frequently and have PVRs to cover the delay, but true VOD doesn't exist in either place. It isn't like having a video store at your fingertips because you only get the shows they offer. They don't have the thousands of movies a video store has.

    1. Re:dishes support 3 tvs? On what planet by papasui · · Score: 1

      Obviously you haven't heard of the 3 free deal where you get 3 recievers and a dish. Want another box? Gotta get a new dish coz it only supports 3.

  401. HDTV channels with Comcast versus DirecTV by Kris+Magnusson · · Score: 1

    I didn't need to call Comcast to get the Super Bowl in hi-def. Comcast provides CBS in hi-def by default.

    I have an RCA MM36100 hi-def set and I am using a Comcast-provided Motorola HD receiver. I get all the major networks in hi-def, two "show-off" channels that basically show flowers and other scenery, a local PBS station that broadcasts hi-def part-time, and hi-def HBO and Showtime. The big fun is that my wife and I get to watch Law and Order variants in letterbox format with blindingly clear resolution. Plus the Tonight Show hi-def is broadcast in letterbox format. NBC seems to be pretty good about letterbox. For some reason CBS isn't--for example, Letterman is broadcast in 420p in 4:3.

    All of this said, If I didn't get a better deal using Comcast HDTV with the cable modem (it's a screamingly good deal to combine the two here in the North Bay of SF) I would have selected DirecTV to get the occasional terrestrial over-the-air broadcasts in addition to the major network channels. You don't get terrestrial over-the-air broadcasts with cable, and Comcast doesn't carry UPN in hi-def, so Star Trek: Enterprise (and Smallville?) doesn't (don't) look any better to me, which is a bummer.

    ............. kris

    --
    "I thought I could organize freedom. How Scandinavian of me."
  402. One other Satellite option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can actually get a Canadian Satellite from Bell ExpressVu through a broker.

    http://www.canamsatellites.com

    This is in a grey area. The limited research I did appears that this is legal. I'm paying for the service which is auto-deducted from my credit card by Bell ExpressVu. The price used to be fantastic but has been going up due to the weakening dollar.

    I love it as I like British television and Canada gets a lot more of it than the US. BBC America has shown it's true colors as nothing more than a British DIY channel. BBC Canada is a little better and my daughter loves BBC Kids. You can also get all the US Networks (East and West Coast) wherever you live. And yes, you can get TechTV.

    I bought the PVR which is the same as Dish Network's ,which doesn't come close to TiVo or ReplayTV but it the only one I can use in the US to use Canada's schedule. I've only had it for 2 months, but have thoroughly enjoyed it.

  403. Cable is only answer for local HDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are only two ways to get the local channels/major networks in HDTV, cable or a rooftop antenna. Since even with an antenna I couldn't get all the local channels I opted for cable. All the major shows on the big four networks are now carried in HDTV, including the Super Bowl. Yeah, DirecTV and Dish have some HDTV, but the major portion of available HDTV content is only available with cable.

  404. Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comcast has... problems with their channels. They overcompress them horribly, giving you visual artifacts. It's so bad at my inlaws that I told them rabbit ears on the TV would give better signal on the analog channels than any of the digital channels were.. About the only thing I liked about it were the music channels (#900-950 or so). I've seen satelite around here (Dish, I think), seems pretty good.

  405. The Comcast PVR is very nice by pvera · · Score: 1

    We got the Comcast PVR as soon as the trials started here. The remote control is cumbersome (and a cheaply built piece of crap), and the box will crash if you try to do too many things at the same time. It is also very sluggish once it is getting close to full. Except for these things, the box pretty much rocks. You can record anything except the on demand channels.

    Another thing that can be a problem is that it only has two tuners, so if two channels are being recorded at the same time you are stuck watching one of the two.

    The software interface is so-so, and it does not let you pick a show and remember to record it every day/week at the same time/channel. You can tell set it manually to do this, but it would be nice if you could just click on the show and have an option to record that same show once a week or whatever.

    Ours takes a royal beating. Out of the 50 hours of programming my wife has at least 30 hours with kiddie programs for our son. He totally shreds to pieces VHS tapes and DVDs, so in a few months of having him just watch the PVR instead of tapes and DVDs we have saved a bundle.

    It is very expensive, but to me a platinum package with Comcast (which includes all the on demand channels) plus the extra fee for the PVR is cheaper than what I was spending on Blockbuster late fees. I had Netflix for a couple years but now I prefer on demand.

    As for service stability, the damn thing is rock solid. I have never been out of cable except for a couple hours during the last hurricane (I am in the DC metro area).

    My main beef with Comcast is the issues with the non-published internet caps. If I only had to deal with them for digital cable I would be 110% pleased with them.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
  406. brighthouse networks by vvvteddybearvvv · · Score: 1

    i have brighthouse networks pervisoly time warner in the central florida aera and i dont have any proable with server at all great coustmer service the dvr they over is great and we get nasa tv witch is cool got it when it was timewarenr 2

  407. Satisfied Satellite Customer by Fosberry · · Score: 1

    We got a DirecTV dish when we bought our house seven years ago, after having cable for 15 months in a rental apartment. We're quite happy with that decision:
    1. NFL Sunday Ticket is wonderful for transplanted football fans, and is currently only available from DirecTV.
    2. The DVR combined unit is excellent - it encodes the direct MPEG satellite feed, so you can time shift with no loss of quality.
    3. The picture quality of satellite is far better than basic cable.
    4. The cost is likely lower now. We actually paid for our equipment (they weren't subsidising multi-room systems when we bought), but we still feel we got a better deal than with cable.
    We do sometimes have weather issues. A very heavy thunderstorm or a lot of wet snow piling on the dish can cause you to lose signal. It's kind of amusing seeing the pixelation just before the signal goes - it's an odd collage of superimposed frames. The rain outages are usually very short - sometimes as little as a few seconds, and rarely more than five minutes or so. The snow problems can last a bit longer if you can't get the snow off the dish, but a few hours is the longest outage I've seen. With our last cable service, however, we had three outages that lasted a total of three days, so I can still say we had more downtime in 15 months of cable than in 7 years of satellite. What do you prefer, more frequent brief outages, or fewer very long ones ? YMMV, but I am *much* happier with satellite.

  408. DirecTv + Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I instaled the dish myself and its pointing to the sky through my neighbors huge front yard tree. Not the best of conditions.

    Yet, I have yet to ever lose the signal. A wind storm lifted my patio funiture across the yard. Recently we had relly bad snow storms and ice storms. Again, never once have I lost the signal. Not once.

    Can't say the same about the cable service I previously had.

    BTW, Dell has a rebate going on with a DirecTv/Tivo Combo (Combos are the best -- recordings are all digital) $99 - $49 rebate with a one year DirecTv subcription.

    I can honestly say that DirecTv and Tivo by them selves are fantastic. But together, I now can never imagine watching TV anyother way.

    Regards,
    AC

  409. Here's my experience... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    My sister pays about 80+ bucks for digital cable through Comcast. She does NOT even get a broadband connection. My dad pays about $50 to Dish and gets more channels, including all local channels.

    I also think that Dish's picture is a lot better than Comcast's.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  410. DirecTV with Tivo is the way to go by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 1

    I'm throwing my hat into the DirecTivo camp. I've been a customer for about eight months, and while I can't speak to snow interference (I live in NorCal), I can say that rain has little to no effect.

    Digital Cable here is a total joke, compression artifacts and noise on the video stream are so bad that DirecTV (which still looks cruddy) looks great in comparison. In both cases you're going to notice a serious drop in video quality over DVD or even OTA broadcast with a good antenna, but it's better than VHS.

    TiVO changed my damn life. That it comes with DirecTV is a plus.

    If High Definition matters, most cable systems now get the local stations in HD, but DirecTV doesn't yet do that, and only certain markets can get CBS in high-def (Fox, ABC, NBC, UPN are all unannounced, although Fox should happen sooner than the rest). HDTivo for DirecTV should be out in April / May timeframe, and uses tuners to pull OTA HD broadcasts. Both systems already get (for the most part) the movie stations, ESPN, and HDNet in HD.

    On the whole the DirecTV with Tivo option is really your best bet, I can't stress enough really how much having a Tivo will change your life if you watch 4 or more hours of TV a week.

    --
    Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
  411. Satellite by AstrumPreliator · · Score: 1

    I can only speak from personal experience, but I have never had a problem with Satellite. I have had DirectTV for around 5 or so years now and the only time I have either lost the signal or recieved too many artifacts in the picture for coherent viewing are in major storms. The kind of storms where you turn off your TV to be safe. I've also had a problem when there was about 3ft of snow on the dish from a recent snow storm. Depending on where you put the dish, I've found out that shoes + broom = fix.

  412. DirecTV is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using Satellite for 3 years now and I'll NEVER go back to cable. Not only is there a larger selection, upgrades are much easier instead of spending 5 years running new cable, they just....you know...upgrade :)

    The thing to watch out for though is steer FAR clear of DishNetwork. I had them for 2 years, their equipment sucked(cut out about twice a week and they wouldn't replace it though it was theirs), their service sucked (constant drops in service, shutting service off then realizing they turned the wrong one off), The accounting dept. sucked (charging late fees for checks they received a week before but didn't make it through their system....amoung other things), and quite a few of their policies are a bit on the "jaded" side. For example, after I cancelled my service with them, I still got charged for 2 more months of service I didn't want and had obviously cancelled. THEN turned around and charged my card that I originally used to setup the account with them for the services they DIDN'T render me. I had switched to DirecTV and cancelled my dishnetwork account, why on earth would I want Dish? To make a long story short.....2 years of dish network was 10 years of entertainment hell. I might have gone postal if it wasn't for broadband and my PCs hehe.

    DirecTV has been great for the past year. Only 1 outage and that was during a VERY heavy storm and that was only for 1 minute. If a storm takes out cable it's hours before they get it back up and working, if not days. I can't say enough how great DTV has been for me. As long as things stay the way they are....they have a lifelong customer from me.

    AS far as cable, comcast....I'm noticing they tend to either stretch the truth or outright lie in their advertising. This coming from an Internet Provider who provides DSL, and from a Satellite user. Many times cable is slower than my DSL, but they paint ALL DSL as being slow (we're up to 7 times faster....yeah, whatever). Then turn around and say the same thing about Satellite? Even crappy Dish Network had better service. My GF at the time would e-mail or call me when HER service dropped.....it was more than mine dropped with crappy hardware and dishnetwork shutting things off.

  413. NASA TV: don't bother by Galvatron · · Score: 0
    If you've never seen NASA TV, and just want it because you think it would be cool, let me tell you: it is NOT cool. Every time I've tried to watch something on there, they've done a miserable, fucked up job of it. I've seen interviews where the interviewer's questions can't be heard (and the interviewee does not restate them, so the answers would be something like "yes, you're right, except a bit more so." A bit more what?). I tried to watch the Galileo sendoff, but all they showed was several hours of static "please stand by" screens punctuated by the occasional 2 minute speech. I heard the footage from the control room for the Spirit rover landing was muted entirely.

    If you're interested in NASA, best to just download the occasional webcast, or watch the highlights on your nightly news. NASA TV is totally incapable of putting together programming worth watching.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  414. Apologize if redundant but... by MBraynard · · Score: 1
    I got rid of my cable and my TV. I still get my shows though - time shifted even - from bit torrent / suprnova.org.

    Give it a try, save some money, and get some serious bang for your buck out of that DSL connection.

    Good luck!

  415. Cue Eye-Rolling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    people come over to our house, and are a little surprised that we dont have a tv in the LR. then they get over it, and we play card games, chat, and have some real fun interacting with each other.
    ...Which is nice. Really. Except that you feel the need to make a jackass of yourself trumpeting how much more refined you are because you've forsaken television.

    Your prototypical rant ("TV controls you...") would be a bit less ironic if you weren't posting to Slashdot. How many people would say the same thing about this paltry method of "interacting" with others? So you don't own a television. You're still sitting indoors with your nose glued to a screen, instead of playing baseball or planting a tree.

    I like people who choose their own paths, regardless of the flock's direction. What I can't stand, however, are people like you: who choose a different path simply for sake of being different, so they can brag incessantly that their differences somehow make them superior.

    You make genuine independence look bad.

    1. Re:Cue Eye-Rolling... by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      yeh, whatever dude... i did this "just to be different", for the same reasons that i lead an extremely normal, respectable life in just about every other aspect.... wife, 6 bedroom house, boring engineering job, drive a buick.

      but yeh - i chose to stop watching tv because i'm such a rebel and an extrovert that i needed to be different, and i revel in my being different than you....

      or, it could be that i decided that there was exactly 0 value to be gained from an activity that would suck up 20+ hours of my life every week, and taught me to care about imaginary friends and predicaments.

      you know what caused it? i caught myself racing home from work so i could watch the A-Team re-runs at 3:00 on tbs.

      quite an odd set of priorities.

      i get far more enjoyment out of real activities now, be it excercizing, fixing up my house, making music, working longer, reading, whatever. but - its all things that i control. i am not a slave to passive entertainment.

      how sad your life must be that you must live vicariously through mass-marketted crap. sorry if i dont know who got voted off the island this week, or what rachel did to ross. but, i do know what is happening to my family, my friends, my neighborhood and the world in which i live.

      but, ya know what - if you choose to sit in front of a tv and be programmed to talk, think, and feel the exact same way as millions of other people, watching the same programming are, feel free, knock your socks off. they dont call it programming for nothing.

      you are giving up your free will, and subverting it for the opinions, feelings, thoughts, and ideas that are being spoon fed to you through the television.

      but - as i said - if your happy sleep walking through life, have fun. me - i'm awake and happy.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
  416. Sat is the way. by baomike · · Score: 1

    I live in a COMCAST area.
    When Dish got our local channels , goodbye Comcast.
    I picked Dish over Direct because Direct seemed
    more oriented to sports.
    We had both Dish and Comcast before the locals.
    It turned out we never did watch the locals very much when they were on comcast.

    I had one sat system installed by a dealer, did a
    good job. I put in two myself. Care is the watchword.

    Signal loss does occur, but usually briefly at the equinoxes. The sun transits behind the sat and
    floods the amp. I have had some problems but it has been equipment failure. The gear is 5 years old.

    If you think that weather, what ever, will be a problem use a bigger dish.The standard one works
    fine over most of the US but you can use a bigger
    one, infact they recommend it here in Western Oregon for getting the foreign programming. The sat is quite far to the east (69 degrees) so you look thru a lot of atmosphere.

    The Canadian sat services are also somewhat available, Express Vu has quite a bit of French
    language programming. Yojimbo with french subtitles is interesting.

  417. Satellite has been much better for me by weshart · · Score: 1

    I'm approaching the first anniversary of my switch from Comcast to Dish Network and couldn't be happier. In the past twelve months we've experinced exactly two weather-related outages - Comcast's track record was much worse in my area (North Dallas).

    Quality of the satellite signal is on par with digital cable and noticeably cleaner than analog.

    I'm getting more channels for less money. I just saw an article in the newspaper that Comcast is asking for yet another rate increase.

  418. The word on DirecTivo by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    - I've never lost a signal in rain, but then I live in SoCal where we don't actually have weather for 300 days out of the year. Wind has no noticable effect, and we've had some real blustery days since I got the system.

    - For me DirecTV was marginally cheaper. I also just sort of like the idea that I'm watching TeeVee froma satellite. YMMV.

    - The integrated Tivo has two main advantages. [1] The Tivo records the original digital stream so the recordings look as good as the original. There is no quality setting at all like on the standalones. [2] The monthly fee is half that of a standalone ($6 versus $12).

    Caveats

    - Integrated unit means if one thing breaks, the whole box needs to be replaced or fixed. The is countered by the HDVR2 now costing $99. These things are about in the "disposable" device range now.

    -DirecTV is dragging its feet on the Home Media Option. I personally don;t care about it, but, again, YMMV.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:The word on DirecTivo by mabu · · Score: 1

      - I've never lost a signal in rain, but then I live in SoCal where we don't actually have weather for 300 days out of the year. Wind has no noticable effect, and we've had some real blustery days since I got the system.

      Where I live, it rains 1/3rd of the time. I've gone through major tropical storms and seen trees and telephone poles downed and never lost my satellite service. Maybe the older services were more weather-vulnerable but I don't experience that any more. I had many more outages with digital cable.

    2. Re:The word on DirecTivo by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1
      You know, when we bought our first house, we were finally able to put up a dish, and went with DirectTV because it was cheaper than cable. But they've jacked up their prices. And with 2 receivers, it's back up to "Where the hell is our money going to?"

      I also have an old Tivo. I'm am definately thinking that getting a new integrated unit is the way to go. But not sure if it's "really only $99" and if it's really going to be "$6 a month forever".

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

  419. 10' Satellite Dish by base_chakra · · Score: 1

    If it's at all possible at your new home, I highly recommend getting a big dish--you know, the 6-10ft (or more) dishes that are still a relatively common sight in rural areas. I know what you're thinking: big dishes are analog dinosaurs, and DSS is superior because the dishes are smaller. Imho, the small dish size is just about the only thing superior about DSS, as I intend to prove. :)

    Signal quality - These days, big dishes can receive both analog AND digital signals with the right equipment (yes, it's affordable). These days, the digital signals are typically encoded in MPEG-2. Think it doesn't get any better than DSS? DSS signals are relayed through an interceder. With a big dish, the signal you get goes from the originator to a satellite in space (Telstar/Galaxy/etc.), to you. And HDTV isn't just a promise from your cable company, it's readily available.

    Programming - One of the coolest things about big dish TV is that there's so much great free programming, especially for discerning geeks. Of course, you can also get the same kind of programming that's available on DSS (actually, far more). Some of it's encryped and some of it's not ("free-to-air"). Music channels like as found on DSS are also available. For me, being able to access international programming is one of the most attractive features.

    Interestingly, in addition to dedicated channels on designated bands, you can often catch "wild feeds," which are one-time broadcasts on a certain band and channel that one can watch for free. If that doesn't have geek appeal, then I'm in the wrong club.

    TCO - Yes, the hardware is initially much more expensive than DSS and cable, but once you own it, the operating cost is very, very low. If you subscribe to DSS for more than two-years, I think you'll find the cost of big dish hardware competitive. Since you can subscribe pay channels a la carte, monthly fees can be negligible.

    Geek factor - Owning and maintaining a big dish makes for a really cool on-going project. Personally, I also like learning about satellite communication technologies. Everything about the dish can be DIY, although I highly recommend assistance with the initial installation. After that, most slashdot readers should be capable of performing their own upgrades to accomodate different signal types. Some people also paint their dishes.

    Where available, DSS and cable are probably preferable for non-tech types. Big dish technology has a learning curve, and your living arrangements must be able to accomodate the dish, but I think it's worth it. If you're intimated by the technology but you've got the cash, you can certainly hire pros to do nearly everything, and subscribe to programming packages like DSS owners do.

  420. Satellite beats cable, hands down by Wyntermute · · Score: 1

    I've had both DirecTV and Time Warner cable, and I'm currently a digital cable subscriber with a Time Waner DVR. I would go back to DirecTV in a heartbeat but, alas, my apartment faces the wrong direction.

    The only time that I ever lost signal on my dish was when I had set it up myself and didn't know what I was doing. Once I RTFM'd, I never lost signal even in driving rain or snow. The only time I can remember losing the signal is when a power surge came through the wall and fried the box.

    I have had far more outages with digital cable, the DVR is very slow when changing channels, and the service is far more expensive. You'll get more basic channels (already in digital) for much less with DirecTV. By way of comparison, I was paying roughly $50/month with DirecTV for the basic, movie package and local channels. That same package with cable costs me $75/month, and they recently put the Speed channel in a special sports block, so I am now paying $80/month for cable. The money you save by going with satellite can pay for the TiVo fees.

    That has been my experience. May you have better luck with your entertainment options.

    --


    ----
    Wyntermute, resident psychopath
    "Remember that you're unique - just like everyone else!"
  421. Try before you Buy by Kagato · · Score: 1

    I suggest rying your cable company first. The reason is it usually doesn't cost you much if anything to get cable, and you can usually cancel at any time with no penalty.

    Digital cable channels are typically about the same or slightly less quality than a DBS system. The problem is most of your channels on cable aren't digital. They are analog. While analog can actually be really high quality, on most cable systems it isn't.

    DVRs is a different topic. The cable company usually has a free or cheap DVR solution, however, the interface usually isn't the greatest.

    Tivo is the Top dog for quality and interface. Dish Network (which has more DVR's deployed than anyone else) is second, cable is third. For best (non-HD) picture quality both Dish and DirecTV's DVRs are the best. DirecTV get's a boost because they license Tivo currently.

    HD is a different story. You have Voom, DirecTV, and Dish Network to choose from on DBS and your local cable company. Your cable Co may or may not have a better selection of channels based on your location. The DBS provides will all require an ant for local reception. (Exception, Dish Network offers a National CBS feed in 14 O&O markets).

    For HD Dish network costs the least. You should be able to get Dishnetwork with a HD STB for free, however, because of it's popularity it's back ordered in many places. The cable company should also be leasing a HD STB for next to nothing. If you have Comcast demand the Motorola 5100 series, and for Time Warner you want a Scitific Atlanta 8000 series. Anything less worthless.

    But what if you want HD DVR?

    Okay, right now, one choice, Dish 921, for a mean $999 you can get this linux powered DVR that will record both local OTA HD and DBS HD (3 tuners total). DirecTV should have a DirecTivo HD Q2, voom is going for a media center approach, one main box with tuners and a hard drive, with small boxes connected to the main box on other TVs. The cable company is test marketing HD-DVRs in certain areas.

    Only the Dish Network STB is confirmed to have firewire out for digital archiving, but some of the cable STBs are supposed to have firewire. HD Tivo is confirmed not too.

    Still, try the cable company first, see what they have to offer. Wait until Q2 to compare DBS offering.

  422. It's all relative by gdesignrr · · Score: 1

    I recentally went through the same thing. I moved from California to Florida. In CA I had Dish Network and never had a problem. I put it up in FL, and it would work fine through most rain, but the really heavy, hard, tropical depression stuff would block the signal. The bad thing about that is you really just want to sit inside and watch TV on days like that. Its a frustrating time for it to be down. During the summer I had another problem with my dish in that the heat of the sun cooked the electronics on the dish. It was 4 years old by then, and Dish wouldn't give me a replacement for free so I cancelled the Dish and went with Cable. Our cable service here (BrightHouse) is great. I get more channels than I did with basic Dish, plus they have icontrol for their PPV movies, which lets you start them when you want and pause and rewind. This is with the basic cable box. You can upgrade to a full DVR cable box which is like TIVO. Another advantage is that I can get regular non-digital cable on all the other TV's in my house without the need for extra boxes. Overall I've found BrightHouse Cable, here, to have several benefits over Dish. Of course all cable companies are different, and all weather situations are different.

  423. Don't count on those servers by roystgnr · · Score: 1

    I can host my own web/email server off of it, and they have never complained.

    They never complained to me, either, they just quietly and permanently blocked port 80 during one of the IIS worm outbreaks. That's fine for a webserver that only sees infrequent personal use - I can just give people port 8080 URLs instead. For an email server that might see incoming mail, having a port blocked without warning (which they've reserved the right to do for their home users) could really suck.

  424. Comcast's damned "flip bar" by 0WaitState · · Score: 1

    With comcast cable, every time you change a channel or hit the "info" button to return to viewing a channel, a "flip bar" covers the lower third of your screen for the next three seconds. This "helpful" feature tells you the time, channel, and name of show you're watching, along with a banner ad, the real reason for the feature.

    They used to have a configuration option to turn off the flip bar, but that mysteriously disappeared after a year. Now all you can do is reduce its duration (from 6 seconds to 3 seconds).

    Fuck you Comcast, overlaying your own ad on my screen on a service I'm paying for. Do the satellite services weasel in their own ads this way, or do they stay out of the way?

    --

    Remain calm! All is well!
  425. Rainfade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just buy a 3.8 meter(12.6ft) dish from someone for a few bucks, smack your LNB on the end of it... It works. BUD's can be had for quite cheap nowadays. I think even those in alaska could get DTV doing this... Granted the dish would be aimed at the horizon, but it might work :)

  426. Cable vs. satellite. Also ReplayTV and Netflix by ediron2 · · Score: 1
    Caveat: Am not a Comcast subscriber (CableOne). My brother has DirecTV, friends have Dish. I have a ReplayTV. So far, haven't found anyone using Tivo to compare with.
    • Both Digital Cable and Satellite require a decoder box. Same per month cost for additional receivers. However, my Digital cable guide sucks horrendously compared to DirecTV or Dish or ReplayTV. No picture-in-picture mechanism to allow me to see a thumbnail of current channel while scanning guide, lots of ads (3! they eat over 50% of the screen space!) and a horrible horrible user interface that shows 1 timeslot x 8 lines, compared to the 3x8 or better view that DirecTV guide has, that my ReplayTV has, etc. The digital cable box also has braindead programming. It loses current defaults a lot: I'll scan thru the guide, find something on channel 20 that might be interesting, select it...nah, don't want to watch that... hit the guide button and I'm back at the beginning of the list. Page-down, page-down, page-down (did I mention, it's not the fastest guide?) until I get to where I was, then start browsing again... find another prospect, select it, decide no, ...Fsck! I'm back at the top of the guide again! I can work around this by using the 'single-channel mini-guide' that shows at screen bottom while watching a program, but that pretty much sucks as an alternative. I so completely hate the huge ads and the crappy guide that we're discontinuing digital cable in the next weeks. The guide is a hinderance, not a help, in my opinion.
    • From what friends say, DirecTV and Dish integration with their built-in DVR devices is crisp and righteous. Infrared control connections like mine with Replay work about 95% of the time. Sometimes I miss a program due to the Replay not doing it's little Infrared thang, but rarely enough that I might still recommend the separate PVR if there was a near-term chance of changing providers: a DirecTivo cannot work without DirecTv, and a DishPVR is similarly single-minded.
    • Video on demand: sounds cool. We sure don't have that here. How widespread is that and when will it roll out to BF Nowhere?!
    • If everything seems equal and getting cable gets you $10 off a cablemodem connection, that might be an advantage over DSL. Total cost is worth at least glancing at here, since DSL and cablemodems are about the same in uptime/quality.
    • Cable company buried their cable 3 inches below ground thru my back yard. Phone is down at least a few feet. But which one whines loudest about not being taken seriously as a Utility? Cable guys. A word to the cable industry: if you want to be taken seriously, stop being so cheap and do things up to the phone or power company's standards. Act like a utility!
    • Even with a HUGE cable bill and a DVR, I don't have time to sit around scanning guides to find stuff to preprogram to watch. If I don't preprogram it, when I finally get an hour to unwind in front of the TV, I generally can't find anything good. My PVR is polluted with my daughter's favorite shows (and I'm NOT going to argue that issue). So I'm ditching half the movie channels, the digital package, etc. And we're trying out Netflix. Between that and the 30 non-digital cable channels, I'll be more certain to see What I want, When I want to.
    • Fadeouts: it takes some HORRENDOUS stormage to take out DirecTV signal. Seldom lasts long, but sometimes thick snow will kill signal until you climb up and wipe the dish clean. My digital cable garbles more often, to be honest. And unlike Satellite, if your cable provider is lazy/cheap, you can't fix the signal problems. We cancelled the wireless cable because their HBO
    Oh, and the come-back-please offers alone make it worth the experimenting. A year ago I called to cancel a land-based alternative we have called 'wireless cable'; they offered to shave $8 off our bill per month. A friend regularly gets calls to resubscribe to his cable company. I'd be amazed if DirecTV didn't do the same. And my brother saved $400 when he upgraded his DirecTV hardware by cancelling his account. Existing account price for adding receivers was triple the come-back offer's total for 3 receivers and he got 3 months free deluxe programming.
  427. winter install by phriedom · · Score: 1

    One thing that is worth pointing out, even though it seems obvious: If you get a dish, when you or the tech are installing it, you should consider that the bare trees that don't block the signal right now will have leaves on them in a few months, which effectively block the signal. Also consider that most trees will be taller next year than they are this year.

    I've seen it happen, and my buddy had to switch back to cable because there was not a suitable alternative installation site at his apartment.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  428. Nasa TV by hcuar · · Score: 1

    If you want Nasa Tv with Directv, you must have a multi-satellite elliptical dish.

  429. A silly elitist response by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    Why one extreme or the other? Why not do both. I think a Matt Groenig character put it best: television does the playing for you when you are tired from real playing.

    Television isn't all reality TeeVee or sitcoms. The whole point of going to cable or satellite is to get all those more interesting channels, like Discovery and History and so on.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  430. Comcast vs. DirecTV by dovwolf · · Score: 1

    I have Comcast in one place and DirecTV in another, don't ask why.

    As far as I can tell you, DirecTV has been a better services provider and the signal doesn't cut out as they claim, the commercials they show, the dish is always mounted on a pole or they don't mention that install is free now a days.

    Comcast in the other hand, are rude. Signal goes out for no aparent reason, and they have problems upgrading their recievers. Their channel guide is always on the brink.

    This is no attack on cable, cable it self could be good, but this is about Comcast, its a horrible service provider, and it is a bit more expensive. I would go with dish, its cheaper and they have a better customre service record.

    --
    DovWolf
    Say what?
  431. Re:Kill Your TV. No Simpsons? Mmmmm Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its about control. i dont have to be home at 8pm on sunday to watch the simpsons.

    Neither do I. They have this amazing device now called "Tivo". You should look into it, Mr Highhorse.

  432. Sat is best for HDTV by jbohumil · · Score: 1

    DirecTV's HD offerings are better than the Time Warner options. One thing I learned is that where I live, in Minneapolis, most of the local channels are already broadcasting digital channels with a lot of HD content. I got the Zenith HD-SAT520 combination DirecTV and love it. Plug a UHF anntenna in, and depending on your area you may be all set to get a wide selection of HDTV programming. You have to get the triple element satellite though, which will cost a little more. I added this set up to my new Samsung HLN507W DLP and I'm in HDTV heaven.

  433. To bad there's no nonstandalone Tivo DVR for Dish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    After a bunch of annoyances with the local cable company, I'm wanting to switch from cable to one of the satellite providers as well, but they each have serious drawbacks of their own:

    • Comcast:

      • Negative:Gets bad or goes out when it rains hard. (How's that for ironic?)
      • Negative:Every so often they'll update the cable box firmware such that I have to tell the Tivo to use yet another serial port protocol for changing channels.

        (ie, I have it set to one setting, and then it randomly stops working on that setting. I have to switch to another, and it works for a few weeks/months, until the firmware is changed again, and I have to move it back. Calling customer service to ask why they're doing this, or when they'll settle down, or what they're going to settle down to gets you no-where of course, because "they don't support that connector". The customer service people don't see how anything on their end could affect the serial port anyway.)

    • Directv:

      • Positive: A DirectTivo will record two streams at once, making scheduling conflicts much easier to resolve. Also, as a big Tivo fan, I can't imagine having a non-Tivo DVR. (Going from a Tivo to something that's effectively a VCR-with-hard-drive-and-scheduling info would represent major losses of functionality and ease of use.)
      • Negative: They're now effectively intimidating people through lawsuits, suing people who merely bought smartcards and related equipment.

        I was cheering them on a few years ago when they were using clever technological methods of disabling outside access to their signals that they didn't approve of, (and I remember the slashdot community being very postitive about that too.)

        I don't like the idea of supporting their current lawsuit-happy behavior.

    • Dish Network:

      • Positive:They carry The Research Channel!!! Woohoo!!!
      • Positive:They're not lawsuit-happy, so I have no pangs about sending them money.
      • Negative:However, their PVR's don't have Tivo service, and there's no way to get it, without going standalone. (And then you're back to recording just one thing at a time.)
      • Negative:You can't reliably use a standalone Tivo with them either.

        This part may have changed, but as of a few months ago according to the tivo boards, the Dish Network boxes can get "stuck" on some channels, and require the actual Dish Network remote control to unstick them.

        Apparently this happens when changing to a channel you don't get--so if there's any delay between a Dish Network changing it's channel mappings and Tivo being updated, if your Tivo changes to one of these channels, it will be recording that error message until you happen to notice it, days or weeks later.

        Apparently since Dish Network has their own PVRs, they donn't consider the problem too serious.

    I'm still left staying with Comcast for the time being, hoping that at some point there'll be a way to get Dish Network service and have a Tivo PVR recording multiple streams from it directly. So far, it's been a long wait. :-(

  434. Dishnetwork experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had DishNetwork for about 5-6 years now and without even removing my shoes or pants I can count the number of times I've ever lost signal - and never for longer than 5 minutes: always when a massive thunderstorm (think tornadic intensity) was drifting by to the South.

  435. Satellite is best by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

    Satellite is best because when a new free to air channel begins to broadcast, you don't need to pay more for it.

    It's digital too, so the picture is very good. My experience is that it's ok when it rains too.
    When there is lightning you shouldn't be watching tv anyway because it could blow (especially with cable tv wiring) and you should switch off appliances, PCs etc and disconnect them.

  436. Rain doesn't cancel satellite by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    I live near Seattle and hgave DirectTV. The rain has NEVER cut out satellite TV reception. I've had it about a year and a half. It sucks for my ISP, which does cut out in the rain, but the TV half has always been perfect. FWIW

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  437. Go DirecTV: Here's why by pikester · · Score: 1

    As someone who has used all three of the providers you've mentioned, my vote is for DirecTV. Here's my rundown of the pros/cons of each.


    DirecTV

    When I lived in Atlanta, the signal would get knocked out during a severe thunderstorm. Now that, I'm in LA, I never had any problems with the picture (but now I have to get off my butt & water the outside plants). And they have real good service as well.


    Dish Network

    These people were the biggest pain in my ass from day one. Their installer blatently lied to me (and serveral of my neighbors) on what we'd get with our system. The final straw with them was when they tried charging me for porno movies when I was actually out of state when the charges occurred (and no, nobody snuck into my house to watch any). Summary is that customer service with Dish Network sucks.


    Comcast

    This is who I currently have for cable, the only reason why I have them is for the cable modem connection, so much faster than DSL. However, the quality of the digital cable lacks in comparison to satellite. I tend to lose the picture on nice sun-shiney days. Using pay-per-view to watch college football games doesn't work (I usually miss the first 15 minutes of the game & get pissed off, I now just walk to the bar down the street to watch games). Avoid them unless you want a fast internet connection.

  438. Depends on what you want by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1

    Since you're talking about a TiVo, I'll assume you're not in the market for 4DTV or any other C band sattellites. The TiVo can't control a decoder that needs to move the dish to point to a new sattelite.

    I entered the satellite market when I moved to an area of Burlington, VT (the biggest city, if you can call it that, in the state) that was not serviced by Adelphia (the regional cable operator). I priced my two satellite options with the idea of going for the cheapest plan that had my needed subset of channels, namely SciFi, Comedy Central, History, CNNHN, etc. I found that I could get Dish Network's America's Top 50 plan for $19.95/month (or close to that). Currently, that plan is $24.99/month. Dish's AT100 plan competed with the base offering from DirecTV, but I really didn't need to fork over the extra dough for that. I've since moved to an area of the country that allows me to pay extra to get local channels over my satellite feed, so I pay $29.99/month for AT50 Plus Locals (or something like that), still with Dish Network.

    Before you look at your options, sit down and record the channels you need, and the channels you want. Then go find a plan that you can live with at a price that makes you happy.

    Quality: I read the specs long ago, but have not found them repeated-- Dish and DirecTV have higher horizontal resolutions than any analog solution, but I've never actually noticed this in practice; I assume the MPEG compression makes blocks that can't take good advantage of the extra pixels. In good weather, they will compare favorably to digital cable, which it seems like everyone has seen. In bad weather (heavy snow, rain), sattelite signal will degrade, meaning that the MPEG blocks will get bigger, sometimes the wrong colors, and the MPEG sound will be distorted-- if it's bad enough, the entire image may pause or give you a "lost signal" message. On the other hand, I've had cable outages that last for days, unexplained cable downtime that the companies never acknowledge, etc., so I don't fall for the cable ads that say how bad sattelite reception is. If you've ever been to Northern Vermont in January through March, it tells you something that I only lost my satellite signals once or twice a month that I acutally noticed. Aiming the dish is very key to keeping the signal through bad weather.

    PVR. Yeah, you can go for a non-TiVo PVR, maybe your cable company will get one soon, maybe you'll try out the one from Dish, but you will be disappointed. If you go DirecTV, your quality and recording times will be better getting the DirecTiVo-- it just records the raw stream, it doesn't need to encode. If you go Dish, like I did, the TiVo still works great. There's a doohickey (technical term) that fits over the IR receiver so the TiVo basically is its own remote (IR LEDs hooked up to long wires). I was very satisfied with the quality from the DIsh through the TiVo.

    Cable companies are becoming great broadband utilities, but I don't like their FUD and sometimes outright lies about the satellite providers, so anymore, I can't bring myself to support them for TV service.

  439. It's all crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you must watch television, get netflix and watch what you want.

  440. Who? by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    I also accidentally revealed a really hot looking chick's breast over the weekend.

    Who was the hot chick? All I saw was Janet Jackson's.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  441. Disadvantage of a dish by rockwood · · Score: 1
    about two years ago my father was torn between cable and the dish, due to the steady pace of his monthly bills increasing.

    Finally he made the switch to the dish and loved it! All the channels, music, movies, porn and whatever else you could imagine.

    In the long run (twelve months later) he dropped the dish and went back to cable. If I remember correctly he did it prior to his contract being up.. I seem to remember a promotion that comcast was buying out (paying off the remaining contract for you) if you switched back... and he took it.

    Now don't get me wrong ... this wasn't a money issue. He didn't switch back since the cable compnay was offering this special... the switch simply made it easier.

    The two MAIN reasons for switching

    • No local channels - not sure if you could pay extra to have them, but I remember him needing to hookup rabbit ears in order to get the local channels.. wow.. 2003 and someone still using rabbit ears... I think he found them at the junk yard :)
    • Second and ever more of an issue - [picture this] sitting down at the tube, maybe even with a large group of people, watching intently of an important new bradcast from spirit - which has supposedly found life on Mars...the first braodcast coming live and >poof
    Now I have heard of other that have had the dish and microwave on opposite ends of the house and have had no problem, but damn! With current technology and the cost to have something that can be so easily interupted - that suck. In my fathers case he had no choice to have it counted outside the kitchen wall. But what happened if you live close enough to someone else.. what happens if they run a microwave?

    I hate comcast with a passion, but until I have a choice of cable providers I'll have stay with them (comcast).

    --
    Never try to beat a professional at his own game!
    1. Re:Disadvantage of a dish by mabu · · Score: 1

      Most satellite services, such as DirecTV now include local channels. I've never had the problems you site with reception and picture quality. That's probably the fault of poor installation and has nothing to do with satellite.

  442. planes DO block signal by jasonhamilton · · Score: 1

    I canceled my DirectTV service after one year. I did so because of signal loss. Planes DO block signal, but only for 1-2 seconds, the screen freezes up, and then it starts up again. The major problem wasn't planes - I can live with one or two second pauses - it was due to bad weather.. actually, not even bad weather, but any type of rain would cause complete signal loss.

    --
    SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!
    1. Re:planes DO block signal by budgenator · · Score: 1

      any type of rain would cause complete signal loss.
      I've never had that problem on a system that I aimed, however I have seen a couple professional instalations with that problem. The Pro's are almost always an over-worked Independant contractor paid flat-rate, so he gets the same for a 1 hour job as he does for an all day sucker. So His goal is to get you to sign-off on the job as quick as possible, not to get you a signal that'll stay usable under less than ideal conditions.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    2. Re:planes DO block signal by jasonhamilton · · Score: 1
      I aimed the dish myself. The signal was 98 out of 100 for direct tv. During rain it would drop down to the 30's and lose all signal. It wasn't a one-time deal, it was constantly doing this.

      I told DirectTV why I was leaving - they offered me a free DVR, and some kind of free hardware that they claimed would help the signal, but i declined.

      btw - my parents have directtv and have the same problem as I did with the signal loss when it rains.

      --
      SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!
    3. Re:planes DO block signal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drip loops, silicone, solve the majority of rain problems. The regulation on cable installers are pretty lax

  443. Bell ExpressVu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have Canadian satellite service from bell expressVu AKA echostar and can tell you from personal experience that you need to have really horrible weather conditions before the signal degrades at all. If you position the dish correctly IE in a place that avoid heavy wind its unlikely that you will have signal trouble.

  444. Sat is the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The video quality of digital cable doesn't compare to sat IMO. I've seen the new DVRs for our local cable (Cox) and they're nice but the recorded playbacks really looked VCR quality or less to me. I still have an UltimateTV DTV receiver and love it. Basically has all the features of Tivo or ReplayTV. The only time I lose signal is during heavy monsoon dust storms in the summer time (I'm in Phoenix) and it comes back quick usually. There's real porn on DTV not the edited stuff on cable if you really need to know ;) The amount of channels on DTV is much better. At least where I live I have a lot of channels I watch that aren't available on the local digital cable system. If you dig around on the net you can probably find a deal where you get a full dish and receiver set up for free as long as you start service within 30 days. I got both my sat systems free this way.

  445. Neither by Weasel+Boy · · Score: 1

    Television is bad. Don't waste your money on something bad. Don't pay for TV. Don't even watch TV.

  446. DirecTivo by CatOne · · Score: 1

    Really, it's the best thing every for TV watching.

    The cable TV companies may run these bullcrap adds about rain killing the signal... in truth in 3 years I've had a pixellated picture a couple times during REALLY hard rainstorms (the ones where you want to stare out the window and say "woot!"). Cable goes out much more often.

    I'd NEVER go back.

  447. It's not an advantage. Everyone else has it too. by jasonhamilton · · Score: 1
    My cable provider has their own branded DVR service.

    It lets you record 2 shows plus watch a third. I don't see how you can consider that an advantage to a sat vs cable especially when the Tivo services are available for both.

    --
    SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!
  448. Weather does have effects by NReitzel · · Score: 1
    I've had DirecTV for years now, and I can state unequivocally that weather can effect satellite signals. Very large, heavy rainfall in thunderstorms can block signal completely. Normally this occurs for a few tens of seconds with storms just south of my location, but it does happen.

    Having said that, let me also say that I've had far less dropouts and interruptions on my satellite signal than I previously had on my Time Warner digital cable. I recently had the privledge of telling a Time Warner door-to-door sales person that I would put up an old rusty coat hanger before I would ever spend another nickle with Time Warner.

    --

    Don't take life too seriously; it isn't permanent.

  449. Cable vs Satelite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cable or Satetlite, either their going to screw you one way or another. I change cable company twice and tried 2 satelite companies, they all suck when it comes to real problems. BUT I still like watching TV and the ones I've had the least problems is Cox digital cable. They have the DVR, the quality is OK, not great but OK and so far I haven't had any technical problems with it. I've had wrong billing problems but that's another very long story. Good luck making the *right* choice !!!!

  450. Like Microsoft Word feature bloat... by gamartin · · Score: 1

    The cable vs satellite issue is like Microsoft Word feature bloat:

    • Word processors inspire complaints of too many useless features, but everybody wants their few particular features included
    • Cable/satellite inspire complaints of 500 channels of crap, but everybody has a few particular channels they want.

    In my experience, satellite has a wider selection of niche channels than cable, so satellite wins. For me it was SpeedVision (now Speed Channel) for Formula One and Fox Sports World for soccer -- only available on satellite in my area (part of an extra sports package, but available). My wife loves BBC America; I'm constantly tempted by the NHL Center Ice package. We get local channels; the only thing missing is the local cable access channels, so we can't watch town board meetings and so on.

    On a related but unasked tangent, DirecTiVo (DirecTV w/ TiVo built in) is the best overall TV watching experience; just listen to me and get it -- my personal 100% satisfaction guarantee.

  451. Free cable preferred by Zane+Edwards · · Score: 1

    I prefer the free cable that I get by splicing my internet cable connection :P

  452. My opinion by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

    I have Dish Network, and I am very pleased with it. I am currently running a 301 receiver (the entry-level model) with a Samsung HDTV and a line doubler. No, this setup is not HD. I am planning to upgrade the receiver shortly to fix that.

    Before I start my story of TV service shopping, let me point out that I was, as of the start of this experience, already a customer of Time-Warner's cable modem service, Road Runner. I don't know if the cable was carrying live TV channels or not, I have never hooked it to a TV, because I'm a good boy :-)

    When I initially went shopping for such services, in order to compare apples to apples, I did a workup of costs. Dish Network was at $31 for 100 channels at the time, DirecTV was $32 for 100 channels, and Time Warner (cable) was $59 for 100 channels (digital).

    Dish network required me to lay out $200 for equipment. Installation was free. Setup was free (they sent a guy out to do it, but you can also DIY if you fell like it). First year of service was discounted $22/month (making it $9/month). This made the first year service $200 for equipment + $0 installation + $0 setup + $108 (12months * $9) = $308. The second year of service would be simply 12 months at $31, or $372.

    DirecTV would discount the equipment to $50 with a one-year contract. Free installation. Free setup. $32/month. First year total is $50 + $0 + $0 + $384 = $434. Second year total is $384.

    Time Warner would discount the installation to $25 (normally $50) and zero out the setup. They would discount $20 from the first month and $10 from the second month. They own the equipment, so you don't have to buy that. First year total is $0 (equipment) + $25 (installation) + $0 (setup) + $39 (first month) + $49 (second month) + $590 (remaining months) totalling $703 for the first year, and the second year is 12 months of $59 for a total of $708.

    I still remember the conversation with the Time Warner CSR. She told me the price, and I said, "Oh, wow!" She said, "Isn't that great?" I said, "No! It sucks! That is totally out of line with both of your competitors!"

    Needless to say, I got Dish Network.

    I also started getting visits from Time-Warner's door-to-door salesmen, who saw the dish on the front of my house and wanted to convert me. I told them what I have just told you all. They offered me a better deal, but I told them that it was too little, too late. They told me all about the beauty of Road Runner, and that I could have that if I converted. I just laughed and told them I already had it. Each time this happened, the salesman expressed surprise--it seems none of them knew that you could get Road Runner without getting cable TV.

    Oh, two last notes.

    Anecdotally, I have heard from people who are subscribers to both Time-Warner and Dish Network. They report to me that Dish Network's picture is better than Time Warner's digital picture. I have not, however, confirmed this.

    Also, on the issue of rain fading, since it was asked, I do, very occasionally, lose contact with one or both of the satellites in a really, really, really heavy rain. It takes a pretty hellacious storm to cause that, though. People living in the south may see this happen more than those of us up north (States down the coast from us get much more turbulent Summer storms--we get the hellish winter storms), but people living in the south are also a shorter distance to the satellite, so it may actually be a wash, no pun intended.

    --
    www.wavefront-av.com
  453. Go with the less evil provider company by LookSharp · · Score: 1

    I had Adelphia cable, their customer service and billing sucks. I found out my town actually has WideOpenWest cable also, who gave me a great package deal with broadband. I am happy with their cable TV service, but they do have very long hold times if you call for customer service. Easy online billing management.

    If you have a crappy cable provider like some folks out there do, try out satellite. I will say that I only know one satisfied satellite customer out of a dozen or so friends that have it. Weather outages, local channel issues, and setup fees ($$$) are their biggest complaints. With DirecTV's well-documented shenanigans and few viable alternatives, I sleep better with cable. :)

  454. Get DirecTiVo by eison · · Score: 1

    Ok, so I'm late and will miss the mod points, but maybe you'll see it anyway:

    The integrated-with-the-satellite-service DVRs record data staight from the digital broadcast stream directly onto the unit's harddrive.
    This means, they can record two shows at once, and the picture quality will be perfect, and the hard drive usage will be reasonable. Smart computers have already done all the compression for them before uploading to the satellite.

    Stand-alone units record analog data by first digitizing with a real-time MPEG chip.
    This means, they can only record one show at a time (only have one MPEG chip), and the picture quality will be lower than the satellite version (your cheap chip isn't as good as the pre-satellite-upload computer), and it will use more hard drive space to get that lower picture quality.

    So, a "30 hour" DirecTiVo means - 30 hours of high quality picture and recording two shows at once. A "30 hour" standalone TiVo means - 10 hours of good quality picture, or 30 hours of painful compression artifacts, and only tuning one show at a time.

    --
    is competition good, or is duplication of effort bad?
  455. Area Man Can't Shut Up About Onion Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that about sums it up.

  456. Re:Mr. Pot? There's a Mr. Kettle on line 2. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    My TW cable TV has been rock-solid. I did have serious problems with my RoadRunner cablemodem, bad enough that I switched to DSL. I don't know about satellite, but I've heard people say it's stable even in crappy weather.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  457. TiVo & DirecTV Rule - Together They Own by pwthoma · · Score: 1
    I have an old series 1 SA TiVo that I've added a HD and NIC. I have to keep basic cable as I cannot get my locals over DirecTV so this is the best setup for me. I also need cable for broadband as Cox will not let me have just broadband.


    The DirecTiVO is even better because as has been pointed out it will record 2 shows at once while you are watching something that is already recorded. No that's useful as I'm tired of dealing with schedueling conflicts with my old SA TiVo.


    If you do buy then I reccomend going to http://www.dell4me.com/tivo and clicking special offers. You can get a DirecTivo setup for only $49 after $50 mail in rebate.


    For those of you who already have DirecTV and your account is in good standing I've heard nice rumors that if you threaten to cancel they will offer you a DirecTIVO to be installed by a professional for only the cost of shipping the unit which is roughly $11. That's even hotter IMHO but I have no use for it :(

    --
    Eat more bacon!
  458. Similar situation recently... by c_dog · · Score: 1

    I was faced with a similar decision recently, and wound up going with Comcast Cable following three separate (but horrible) experiences with DirectTV Service and Support just trying to figure out what my options were...and more importantly, what my *real* costs would be.

    DirectTV couldn't commit to an installation ETA until after I had signed up and been credit-approved (was told by a rude service person that it could take up to three days to get me into the installation queue, and he refused to speculate on when installation might occur following that), whereas I got a phone committment on installation and setup from Comcast on the first call, and a tech was out the next day...just in time for catching shows in the new Fall line-up. :)

    Despite claims otherwise (of course, not knowing anything about DishNetwork), I haven't been able to discern significant price differences for the packages I desire, making my decision easily based solely on a customer service basis.

    Your mileage may vary.

  459. Re:Mr. Pot? There's a Mr. Kettle on line 2. by bearwayne · · Score: 1

    I have both Dish Network (for most of my TV viewing) and Comcast (local channels & cable modem-I save $15 on the cable modem in exchange for paying $13.99 for local channels).

    Dish Network has been great. I do lose the signal during very heavy rain, and that is only briefly. One disadvantage to the satellite companies: after you've had them for awhile, your equipment becomes obsolete in the sense that it doesn't have all the latest features. For example, my Dish Network receiver is 4 or so years old--it takes forever to obtain information about a show via the online guide whereas the new receivers have enough memory (I assume) that the result is instant. The only way I can get new equipment with out paying $$$ for it is to switch to DirectTV. The satellite companies do nothing for loyal customers.

    As far as Comcast goes, it has been surprisingly reliable, both the TV and the cable modem. The picture quality on the cable is not as good as the picture quality on the dish. One big advantage of cable is that if you're a Weather Channel junkie, you get the local weather information & warnings that are not available on the Satellite TWC feed. The newer sat receivers may have an alternative to this.

    So, while I've been very happy with Dish Network, I will probably switch to DirectTV just to get new equipment when I move.

    The price of Satellite as far as # of channels for your buck is much better than with cable.

    The Comcast commercials bashing "the dish", while being somewhat humorous, are pretty much hyperbole at best, and lies at worst. Anyone who would be supid enough to put their dish in a tree deserves to lose their signal when the wind blows!

  460. Re:Directv beats cable, let me count the ways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be accurate, it really depends on where you live. I have had experience with Comcast in several areas where I have lived and can vouch for this. Comcast Digital Cable in northern NJ (Plainfield for example) has the older LARGE-typeface comercial-ridden guide the previous poster mentioned. Comcast Digital cable in southern NJ (camden county, ocean county) and Northern VA (alexandria city) have the newer set-top boxes with digital audio and s-video out and the improved program guide, easier to read, no ads, etc.

    You should also note that on all the systems i mentioned, the local channels and all channels 2-80 are non-digital (and the quality is often piss poor) while the 100-900 channels are digital and compression artifacts vary on a channel-by-channel basis. Premiums like HBO usually have fewer artifacts and are delivered in DD5.1, while the Discovery channel is often so blocky i get a head ache. Switching between digital and non-digital channels takes a second or two (longer with the older style system).

    Everyone I know with comcast digital (regardless of system generation) has had to hard-reboot their box on average 2-3 times a year.
    All around I am not satisfied with the consistency and quality Comcast service in any of places I have lived, but can't get sat because I never had an unobstructed southern exposure.

    I will give Comcast kudos for the HBO and Showtime ondemand feature. You can play many current run HBO titles from your box for no additional charge and they are often in DD5.1. DirecTv does not have that, but I assume DirecTivo could give you a similar functionality. I have heard the Comcast DVR is nice, but have not seen it myself.

  461. YA Cable/DirecTV comparison by Vizzie · · Score: 1

    I live in Texas, where everything's bigger, especially the spring storms. Still, DirecTV goes out maybe 3-5 times a year, mostly during the spring storm season, for 5 minutes to a half hour. All in all, though, it's far better than cable has been to me.

    The biggest reasons I won't give up my DirecTV for cable:

    Price. DirecTV is about $9 per mo. cheaper than cable, and cable makes you pay extra to get TechTV.
    NFL Sunday Ticket. Only on DirecTV, and as a Packers fan in Texas, a must have.
    DirecTV TiVo. It really does change the way you watch TV. It may sound like a cliche, but you can't really understand the impact to your TV habits til you have one.
    Service. DirecTV, I've had to hold once when I called in, and that was the one time they've had a major outage that I've noticed, affecting locals only for a large part of the country during primetime. I had Comcast back when it was still TCI, and I was pretty much guaranteed a hold of at least 5-20 minutes.

    In the past, when I had cable, I had picture quality problems (my cable would go completely out for a couple minutes eery 2-3 hours), and the process to get it fixed was just painful. Call the cable company, wait 45 minutes past the 4 hour service window they give, and the person who shows up is just a customer appeasement engineer who shows up, checks to make sure you're not a total idiot and that everything's hooked up correctly. CAE tells me there's nothing she can do, since it's not shoring the problem now, but tape it when it happens again and call back (tape static. Brilliance.) So, I do so, wait for the next guy, who has the ability to slap a tester on at the junction box and confirm the lines coming in to my apt. are OK. He's done all he can, so I have to get another appointment with the guys who can actually look for the problem, and after 2-3 visits from them, they finally find the poor connection somewhere down the line and fix it. The whole process took about a month.

    On the other hand, I've had my dish for 3 years, and the only time I had a problem was twice when the gardening service knocked my dish out of whack (I live in an apartment, and the dish is attached to a pole embedded in cement in a bucket on the patio.) Took maybe 5 minutes to go out there, set the dish back in place, and I was good to go.

  462. TV Receive Only (TVRO), or Fee to Air TV "FREEE" by apacheis · · Score: 1

    I suggest you consider the free satellite TV that is available. C-band and Ku-Band have tons of free satellite signals. There is also encrypted signals you can subscribed to which is similar to DirecTV and Dish. NASA TV is available via C-Band. You can pick up Ku-band receivers here http://www.eyeinthesky.net/ for under $200. C-band cost a little more. C-band Systems are available http://skyvision.com/store/c-band_systems.html. C-band frequency is 3.4-4.2 GHz, and Ku-Band frequency is 10.7-12 Ghz. The receiving frequency range place the limit on the size of receiver. Which basically mean for C-band you are required the big-dish, and Ku-band you just need a small dish that is rather cheap. Bear in mind that when you get a big-dish, you will be able to receive both bands whereby you will only be able to get the Ku-band with the small dish.

  463. cbl vs sat by jack455 · · Score: 2, Informative

    While the cable commercials aren't wrong when they say you lose satellite in severe weather, they exaggerate.
    I've had both Digital Satellite and "Digital" Cable.
    Digital is almost always just a buzzword to confuse the ignorant. Most cable companies didn't increase their resolution when switching to digital.
    Summary is that satellite has 480 lines. (480 in the 640x480)Cable has 240? something sad like that.
    If you need your TV during a storm to keep you occupied then get cable. Me I turn mine off so it doesn't get surged.
    (I'd recommend Dish Network over DirecTV for political reasons go to http://www.eff.org/directvdefense/20030812_eff_pr. php for why
    Good Luck!

  464. Dish Network customer for 4 years!! by Pontiac · · Score: 1

    I've had Dish Network for 4 years now..
    In that time I can't remember a single outage.

    Prevous to that I had AT&T cable..
    If I went a month without a 1-2 hour loss of cable I was lucky.

    What drove us over the edge to get Dish was a 1 week outage because they accidently dug up their own lines.

    As for Weather, planes and whatever blocking the signal.. I live in Tacoma, Wa in the landing path for Sea-Tac airport. If anyone should have weather/plane signal related problems its me!!
    Still it works day after day without issue.
    Hell I've had birds sitting on the dish and didn't have any problems.

    Worried about the equipment breaking?? $3 a month will get you a full warrenty for as long as you keep paying or go with the Dish Home plan and it's all covered.

    --
    If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
  465. You're watching the wrong channel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    QVC! (Warning! You will end up with a bunch of crap.)

  466. I like DirecTV by TekZen · · Score: 1

    I used to have Comcast. Then I forgot to pay the bill. They un-hooked my cable and I hooked it back. they never sent me another bill. (ah the good ole days). Then I bought a house. Since I was going to have to pay if I wanted cable/satelitte in my new house, I looked into my options. I got a great deal from DirecTV (including TiVo). I get tons of channels for under $100 a month (all the movie channels, digital chanels, etc). To get the same kind of package with Comcast would cost me at least $140 (and no TiVo). Rain and wind have never affected my signal. It may happen one day, but I have had a tree knock out my cable before too. -Jackson

  467. Re: It's a toss-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find that with ExpressVu (Ontario Canada) we get a few more channels of interest for the same price as the cable digital equivalent.

    Now the downside: You can't really "channel surf", cuz there a 1 to 3 second delay to tune in every channel. So imagine trying to click through channels like you're used to doing on good old cable--You can't.

    Next, it does in fact cut out during rain storms, and such. Which is damn annoying. I imagine that if you live in, say Seattle, then you're going to lose the signal alot! ;-)

    My last gripe is strictly a channel package complaint, so it only affects Expressvu: They go and package up all the music channels together. I find that really lame. One video channel is enough thank you, but of course, they don't offer a package with one in the mix...

  468. Re:Tech TV - not all cable's fault by kcurtis · · Score: 1

    Just a comment that most of these Telemundo and other Spanish-language stations tend to be local, small, broadcast stations. The cable company has to carry them. So some other channels will get knocked off to make room if there isn't extra room available.

    As far as the women's and golf channels, well, that you can bitch about.

  469. One Thing Missing on DirecTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DirecTV doesn't carry NASA TV. I have considered changing to cable as they carry a channel from U of Washington and UWTV will sometimes brodcast NASA TV. Does any cable system have NASA TV full-time? Does Dish carry it?

    1. Re:One Thing Missing on DirecTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DirecTV's site says they do, but I think you need the multi-sat oval dish.

    2. Re:One Thing Missing on DirecTV by apacheis · · Score: 1
      Direct TV does carry NASA TV. However, it is avilable thru the eliptical dish, or dual oval dish with a multi switch. Here is a list of all the channels including NASA TV that's being offered by direct TV on Satelite 119.o degrees.

      http://www.lyngsat.com/packages/directvusa119.shtm l

      PS: If you have just one oval dish, chances are you are receving Direct TV only @ 101.o degrees wich is Direct TV preimum channels.

      http://www.lyngsat.com/packages/directvusa101.shtm l

  470. I can only say one Thing by TheDarkRogue · · Score: 1

    On Demand Digital cable is Da Shit!
    But you can't get it with Satilite.

    (I do not work for comcast and I hated them with a passion from the cable internet hell they put me in (SpeakEasy is Da shit btw too), Untill the OnDemand came out)

    --
    (Score:0, Interesting)
  471. Depends on where you live... by n()_cHIEFz · · Score: 1

    ...here in southern New Mexico, where we get about 340 sunny days a year, weather isn't a problem for satellite reception. If you're going to live in Seattle where it's alway's raining, you may want to look into cable.

    Comcast is our local cable provider, and the main draw for me to DirecTV is the Sony receiver. It's way better than any digital cable/dish receiver that I have ever used. I don't have much experience with DVRs but the TiVo w/DirecTV my friend has seems to be a lot cooler than the ReplayTV junk Comcast is trying to sell.

    --
    -- Is it a right to remain ignorant? -- Calvin
  472. Re:Directv beats cable, let me count the ways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although DirectTV seems to be winning the battle here, I have both DirectTV and Comcast Cable and there are advantages to each:

    Cable:
    Gives me local channels in High Def (although its their definition of local (I live in Maryland and prefer the Washington channels, but my local channels are Baltimore, so that's what I get - plus there's no Fox High Def in Baltimore, so I don't get Fox). Their Scientific Atlanta convverter box is awful though.
    Comcast "On Demand" works well for the limited number of programs you can request.

    DirectTV:
    Better quality images (1080i), but more limited selection of channels.
    NFL season ticket
    No Washington channels (see above) at all.
    One significant episode of signal loss - during a slush storm in 3 years (cleaned the dish and cured the problem).
    Cheaper than cable (but fewer services as well).

    No significant service problems with either.

  473. Weather effects by Clod9 · · Score: 1
    I get Dish network in Seattle, where the weather is frequently lousy. Rain does NOT affect it.
    Snow will if it accumulates on the dish, but that's easy to dislodge with a broom.
    The only real problem is wind -- a south wind gust of 30+ MPH can cause the receiver to lose the signal,
    and reacquiring it takes a few seconds. Watching a program when that happens every few minutes is no fun at all.
    We give up when that happens, maybe 3 or 4 times a year.

    Cable here (Comcast) is much more expensive, unless you get the stripped-down version
    (I've heard there is a tier BELOW "basic" cable that only costs something like $25 a month).

    We are quite satisfied with Dish, but then we don't watch much TV...the only reason we pay anybody for TV service is to get Dish's optional Russian channels, which are the best of any service I'm aware of.

  474. Multi-room with one receiver by ctbarker32 · · Score: 1

    A repeated theme I see is that you need a separate DTV receiver for each TV. This is not necessarily true if you use a multi-room distribution system that typically runs less than $200. You take the output of up to two video sources an plug them into the multi-room box and then you can send up to 5 feeds via ordinary coax antenna cable (rg-59 works okay) to points around the home. The system includes ir targets and an ir blaster that allows you to control the single DTV receiver from any location. It is very clean and works very well. Of course, the video is the same on all the TVs but if you are single this not a problem. You could always add a second receiver with this system for added flexibility. Channel-Plus makes these devices.

  475. Comcast is PURE EVIL by dankdirk77 · · Score: 1

    I am now on *DISH* Networks and loving every day of it...

    Comcast will fuck you with 1) Billing 2) Junk-mail lists 3) Fraud 4) Crappy Equipment.

    Digital Cable? Ever heard of it from Comcast? Well it sucks. You cannot flip through the channels, BECAUSE EVERY CHANNEL CHANGE REQUEST TAKES THE SYSTEM 5-10 SECONDS TO PROCESS!!!!

    They advertise this as a "feature" ie "Now you won't have to flip through channels!!!" NOW YOU CANNOT FLIP THROUGH CHANNELS.

    Dish is badass, WAY CHEAPER, much happier ANIME scene (techTV included for the 33.00 package). Dish gets you PVR! FUCK CABLE FUCK COMCAST FUCK YOU IF YOU SAY THIS IS FLAMEBAIT!! I'M JUST SOUNDING THE ALARM SO YOU DON'T MAKE A HORRIBLE, LIFE ALTERING MISTAKE!!

    --


    SCO: 800-726-8649
    Verisign: 800-361-8319, 888-642-9675
    Diebold: 800-433-VOTE (8683)
  476. Well said! [nt] by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

    Well said.

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  477. I prefer satellite... by dvd_tude · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... because they offer more channels for less money and their encoding quality is (usually) better (my experience based on DISH Network; can't speak for DirecTV.) Satellite wins hands down in almost all categories: quality, value, programming choice, reliability, equipment choice and customer service.

    Quality and value... satellite providers have more total bandwidth (about 2-4x) to work with than the typical hybrid fiber-coax cable plant. Being all digital they don't have to carry legacy analog channels. So, they have less need to compress heavily than the cable guys do and so can offer more channels at lower cost.

    Programming ... satellite offers more channels (especially DISH) than most cable MSO's for less money. Locals too in most markets, and HDTV which cable co's have been painfully slow to adopt.

    Reliability... as much as the cable ads make of it, it's a total non-issue with satellite. It's amazingly robust. In the three years on DISH I had one (!) outage due to rain fade, and then only for about 30 seconds or so. Compare this to my experience with cable providers (in my case Charter, now Adelphia) who seem to have several outages a year: distribution amps blowing up, segments taken down for maintenance/upgrades, and so forth.

    Equipment... the satellite providers seem to adopt new tech more quickly than the cable MSO's. They embrace newer media (like HDTV, PVR's, etc.) more enthusiastically than the cable heavyweights do. This has a lot to do with the business model: generally, they unbundle the box from the service (you own the box) so you have choice. Some perceive this as a drawback; however when you look at the poor quality of most cable boxes vs. their rental cost you can see you get a better shake from DirecTV or DISH.

    Customer service... DISH is awesome, can't speak for DirecTV although I understand they've improved too. In my case DISH patiently worked with me to debug a complex HDTV setup using a 5200 IRD, HDTV modulator and a Mistubishi HD set. Another time they broke 'seamless integration' with a firmware upgrade, they fixed it in two days (!) after I reported it to them.

    Now, the satellite drawbacks...

    First, there's no 'analog only' option so you're always looking at MPEG-2 and thus have slower channel surfing (not to mention your TV's P-I-P is mostly useless.) I understand there are IRD's with two decoders now.

    Second, satellite broadband is poor due to the up/down latency (c = 300,000 km/s, it's the law ;-) and limited aggregate bandwidth.

    Third, you do have to mount the antenna. Some quibble about this but it's not a big deal: installation and gear are free if you buy a package; it's a simple DIY project if you prefer to run your own.

    Most users need only one dual-LNB antenna. DISH needs a second one aimed at 61.5 or 148 if you want some of the 'non-core' programming, such as their slate of international channels (including Al-Jazeera and World Link TV - gotta get your Karachi Kops somehow) and some of the HDTV feeds. If your locals aren't on the core sats (110 and 119) DISH will install the second antenna free.

    Also, before you commit to satellite, you need to verify that you have a clean sight line to the bird(s.) DISH has a tool you can download to get your azimuth and elevation to each bird. For the continental US the core satellites are at 101, 110 and 119 deg. - generally due south for most people. You do need to mount the antenna(s) on something that doesn't move - a nearby tree won't do it. If you're unsure about any of this have an installer do a site survey for you prior to entering into a contract.

    If these drawbacks aren't a concern for you... then your next choice is DirecTV or DISH.

    Three things should dictate your choice: programming, equipment and service.

    Programming... DirectTV has NFL Sunday Ticket, DISH does not. DISH has lots of international programming, DirecTV does not. Other than that their lineup is nearly identical, but... to

  478. DirecTV is awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fantastic service!

    And contrary to the propaganda by Comcast & cable companies, if you have your dish aligned right you will never be without a picture unless a huge thunder cloud rolls in the path of the signal (very rare).

    In the SF Bay, California, we've never been without a picture, PERIOD. DirecTV costs half as much as Comcast's Digital Cable package ($45/mo [local channels, 2nd receiver] vs. $82 from Comcast for fewer channels, most of which are NOT digital).

    DirecTV is the way to go. FUCK comcast. FUCK cable! Monopolies trying anything they can to hold on to people who believe propaganda... the same people who voted for Bush & supported the war (they're idiots, and a shit load of them!).

  479. Rain/Weather Fade by TheGax · · Score: 1

    With a properly pointed dish, weather will not be a big problem. The issue becomes when enough water or snow accumulates on the dish to change the shape of the dish for a short period of time. I'm not talking about physically deforming the dish, but just changing the focus point.

    Now, I live in West Central Florida which gets a ton of rain, especially in the summer. The only time it gets bad is when the storms are so severe that it would probably be a good idea to turn off and unplug all that sensitive equipment. A passing shower or even an all-day soaker doesn't affect me at all.
    There are weather sheilds available that keep the rain and snow (for you northerners) off the dish. That should keep the problem down to just those rare times when the signal just can't penetrate all the rain of a heavy heavy storm.

    Of course, that all assumes that the dish is pointed accurately. The picture will be fine with a less than ideal signal on a clear day. But you want to get as high a signal strength on as many transponders as possible. Common sense.

  480. Not Even Close! by BluFlame · · Score: 1

    Just spend 9 months in San Francisco, and I'm really glad to be back home with where I have DirectTV.

    Yes, the signal fades....Maybe twice a year, with bad/no signal for maybe an hour or so. Usually all it takes, is dusting the snow off the dish.

    Comcast on the other hand, had problems daily ranging from loss of sound (minutes at a time), to bad video (about 1/2 the time), to being completely gone for hours (and on occassion days).

  481. Re: DBS vs Cable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it has been my experience with DirecTV that it is much easier to deal with the occaisional rain outage (it has to be raining VERY heavily on your dish, or some serious rain/snow clouds are in your LOS to the satellite, for the coverage to break down temporarily) than it is to deal with ever-increasing cable TV rates.

    Also, even on my old Sony TV, the redigitizing that cable does on its feed for digital cable is even more pronounced than with DBS. After all, cable TV headends get their non-local feeds from satellite (C-band, and maybe S-band) also...

    The only drawbacks is with the Weather Channel, because the "Local Weather on the 8's" is really not local at all, and the lack of the occaisional cable-only channels that aren't on DBS, things like Northwest Cable News, Chicagoland News, etc., and local community access programming.

    At least with the various sports programming packages, you can conceivably get ALL of the regional Fox Sports Net channels...

  482. NASA TV? With heaving naked breasts? by matthewmichaelagee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know if DirecTV is still like this everywhere, but I can tell you about my own experiences living in Clear Lake, Texas (the home of Johnson Space Center).

    My family used to subscribe to whatever increasingly-large umbrella-corporation-of-the-month had most recently bought out our local cable television monopoly. In the eighties, when it was basically a local mom-and-pop provider, it was pretty darned cool. In the early-to-mid nineties, when the string of buyouts really got underway, its quality of service declined while its pricing increased significantly. In the mid-to-late nineties, when DBS began heating up real competition, its quality of service dramatically improved while pricing remained more or less static. And all through those times we received NASA TV, which was great!

    Cut to the twenty-first century, and my family switched over to DirecTV DBS. It's been amazingly cool, albeit just as expensive as overpriced cable.

    We regularly get nice big wrath-of-god thunderstorms blowing in off the Gulf, and yes, in a *really* bad storm the signal might occasionaly break up for a few minutes at a time, but it's not significantly more frequent than cable television - remember, they're getting their signal from a local satellite downlink, too. I'd rate the reliability as just slightly below cable - it *is* a smaller dish, after all - but not enough to be any sort of a nuisance.

    DBS receivers kick digital cable receivers' @sses, hands down, though. The user interface is entirely dependent upon your box, and I've sampled a great many of both sorts of boxes amongst many friends, having lived in five cities in the past four years. Not a single digital cable box has been anything but a heavily-sedated slug by comparison to the DBS boxen. If you enjoy scrolling through hundreds of channels you don't subscribe to in order to find the one that you're looking for, digital cable's all for you, since DBS custom channel lists spoil that sort of fun. DBS receivers are faster, more user-friendly, more programmable, more configurable, more extendable, and not a bloody-closed-platform. You can buy a DBS receiver from any of a half-dozen manufacturers, while digital cable receivers are often vendor-locked-in, and it *really* shows.

    DirecTV channel selection is superior to any digital cable system I've since tried as well, and I go for geeky esoteric stuff like NASA TV Worldlink. Bear in mind, though, that that's from the perspective of a global sampling of culture. There's a lot of fringe quirky stuff to be found on DirecTV if you dig for it, but local public-access and community channels are only available through your cable provider, as those aren't even broadcast on open airwaves. That's really the only negative point for DBS - NASA TV used to be a Clear Lake public access station in the eighties!

    Local broadcast channels have never been an issue, though. Most major markets now have a decent selection of their own local broadcast stations available through regional DBS programming packages, all the national broadcast networks get DBS feeds from two or three different big cities (which often nets some interesting other-regional programming as a bonus), and a good antenna can pick up most stray channels left out of the mix. I don't know for certain, but I've heard that some of the newer DBS receivers even include built-in tuners so you never have to switch your television and audio source when you want to watch antenna broadcasts. Local broadcast channels just aren't an issue.

    Right, the heaving-naked-breasts part. Well, I had great fun browsing DirectTV channel lists upon my first experience in the fall of 2002. I was pleasantly surprised to see that it carried NASA TV of all things, so I dialed straight in only to see two women and a man having what must've been quite a pleasant experience. It didn't look like the usual NASA programming, so I figured something was crossed up in the feed and let it go. Oddly, when I checked back a couple of nigh

    --
    ...m...
  483. COMCAST SPAMS YOU by dankdirk77 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Another thing about those pieces of living shit at COMCAST>

    They incorporated a pop-up ad delivering mechanism into the "menu" system of the cable box in an automated "upgrade" about 2 years ago.

    Now, everytime you simply want to view the menu system, you are bombarded with pop-ups about the new MPAA movie coming to cable or possibly that herbal supplement you've been meaning to get.

    They also bundle pre-printed pop-up ads into you monthly bill, for easy access. Open up that $50 mutha and you will be delighted to find ads for Check Printing services. Get your personal checks printed with such endearing figures as J-Lo and Ben Affleck in the movie Gigli (Check Theme 10110 on the order form today!).

    Its such pure bullshit... COMCAST, may these micro-aol ass-knats rot in HELL.

    --


    SCO: 800-726-8649
    Verisign: 800-361-8319, 888-642-9675
    Diebold: 800-433-VOTE (8683)
  484. Re:Signal loss not a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live on the Hudson River and the weather can get nasty: 40-50 mph winds, fog, driving rain & snow, etc. Every so often - less than once a month - I lose signal for a minute or so but that's it. The only problem with satellite is if you live in an apartment building that uses the same equipment for all apartments (i.e., everyone uses the same receiver on the roof) it is hard to keep your equipment up to date since it is up to the management company to upgrade everyone.

  485. basic cable + bad weather = same issues as a dish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen bad weather affect our basic analog comcast cable service the same way digital dish signals get interrupted. Since they get the signal to the local office digitally via dish, you can get all the artifacts of a poor digital transmission (like blocky and paused picture) even when you have simple analog cable.

    Quite amusing when it happens during a comcast commercial where they are ripping on dish service.

    ~xeontux

  486. Dish Networks much better than Comcast. by pr0vidence · · Score: 1
    I moved out of my parent's house about 6 months ago. They got fed up with Comcast's crappiness and got a Dish Networks rig. Man I miss my dish. The Dish setup had MORE channels and was cheaper than Comcast right off the bat. The DVR rocked you can do whatever you want, no restrictions (short of plugging in a network cable and copying the show(s) to a computer) you can skip the commercials (although you have to do that manually), or pause live TV. all that lovely stuff your average TiVo like device should do.

    Now I am living in an apartment complex where I can't get my own dish and am stuck with Comcast crappy cable setup. Boy was my mother right. Comcast seems to be jacking the price a little bit more every month or so. There are less channels (and several of the ones that are missing are ones I watched often, like TechTV). I am paying more for "Regular Extended Cable" (with no extras like HBO) than my mother pays for the Dish setup WITH 8 HBOs and 5 Showtimes. I can opt to get the digital cable setup but that costs even more and the "benefits" (if you want to call it that) aren't all that great (and there are STILL no HBOs included, you have to pay even MORE for those). No DVR (yet anyway, they are supposedly working on that) I used a friend's digital cable setup and the menu system is slow and clunky and not very effective.

    Weather does not effect the dish either, we live in New England where there are healthy doses of all types of weather. Rain, snow, sleet, wind, three dogs in the house sneezing regularly, anything esle you can imagine, we have never lost our Dish connection, the picture has never suffered in quality at all. The signal is digital through and through whereas cable is analog so it's a better picture with better sound anyway. What else do I need to say? the dish is better in so many ways.

    To conclude, Comcast sucks, get a Dish.

  487. which is easier to hack (steal)? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I've seen hacking recipies all over plus scare stories about huge fines, but cant relly sort out the truth.

    1. Re:which is easier to hack (steal)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stealing video from the sky is about as easy as downloading mp3s from the internet. Stealing cable is very risky.

      For the DBS satellite services, it's simply a matter of reprogramming your smart card or running a pc based smart card emulator that is connected to your receiver through a serial interface.

      If you are in the US, stealing ExpressVu signals from the Canadians is a pretty safe bet. I don't know of any laws covering interception of foreign satellite signals. The CIA and NSA do it all the time.

      More Info and HowTos can be obtained at http://www.sattech.ca and other sites.

  488. Weather Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Cable companies claim about satellite TV losing signal in the weather is pretty lame. How do you think the cable company gets their signal? Yup, off a satellite feed.

    Their local head end antennas are going to be suffering from the same weather conditions as your DBS dish. Maybe more so as they have far more sail area with the bigger dishes. I've had my Comcast signal go down in big storms around here (Southeast.PA.US).

    And not only can cable go down due to weather effects on their antennas, but the rest of their infrastructure (cable on telephone poles) is vulnerable to ice build up or car crashes.

    Don't buy those marketing myths.

    Hmm maybe DirecTV or Dish could use that for an ad campaing. Show the wind effects on their small dish, vs those on the cable co. dish. Then an ice laden tree taking out cable, cut to DBS cable attached securely to out side of house. Then car slams into telephone pole, etc. Of course cutting back and forth to people watching DBS vs. people staring at cable static.

    Note that I really don't hate cable, just the cable companies and their rates. But that's something a little honest healthy competition should cure.

  489. Direct TV with Tivo is the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to have Comcast cable, and hated it. Way too expensive for the channels I got. I also hated the way they treated the customer (me). For example, I am not a sports fan at all, and never watch a game (didn't even bother to watch the Super Bowl). Comcast bought a premium sports channel, added it to the basic channels, and increased everyone's bill by $2.00 a month to pay for it. And don't get me started about the way Comcast abuses cable modem subscribers (unlimited access my ASCII!)

    I switched over to Direct TV, and never looked back. Lots of digital channels for a reasonable fee (around $40, I think), including local channels. Combine that with a Direct TV Tivo receiver, and you have (IMHO) a perfect system. There are two lines coming from the dish on the roof to the Tivo, and I can record two different channels at the same time, while watching a program I recorded earlier. With the receiver and the Tivo in one box, you don't have to play around with remotes, like you do when you buy a separate Tivo

    The only time I lose a signal is when there's a really bad storm (usually a thunderstorm) between the dish and the satellite, but that's rare, and when it happens, it doesn't last long. It's a small enough price to pay to get rid of Comcast completely!

  490. Signal Loss by anim8blur · · Score: 1

    I have had Direct TV for over a year now. No matter how bad the weather has been I have never lost my signal. We DID have an electrical storm a couple months ago (very out of the ordinary), it looked like a tornado as it passed over my town (Palmdale, CA). That day I lost my signal for, literally, 2 minutes. So don't listen to the hype of the cable companies. You won't have a problem with signal loss. Much better than cable. -Paul

  491. DISH/DirecTV/Bell ExpressVue - secrets by LandGator · · Score: 1

    Read Que's HIGH TECH TOYS FOR YOUR TV for some more info on systems.

    Went to EchoStar (DISH Network) four years ago, and despite paying $10 for cable modem service from Comcast because I don't get TV from them, will not go back. Had rain fade during really bad hail storms (Portland OR), and when choppers were overhead, but this is *very* rare. All satellite systems have 'equinox fade' for hour at the sping and fall equinoxes, as the sun goes behind the satellites. However, my cable goes down far more often than the DISH systems do.

    Both DISH and DirecTV have *integrated* PVRs, which are much more hassle free than an off-the-shelf TiVo or ReplayTV controlling the cable box via the IR blaster.

    The TiVo software in the DirecTiVo is much more sophisticated than the software in the DISH PVRs, and if you don't mind that TiVo phones home everything you watch (oh, we will just aggregate the data for marketers, Mr. Ashcroft will never see it....), then, go ahead, go DirecTiVo. My ancestors did not trust King George, and neither do I, so I use DISH, despite the extra features (e.g., 'Season Pass') which make TiVo nicer.

    Program guides for DISH are downloaded from the birds along with the rest of the data stream. I have a weekly ritual where I grab the TV section from the Sunday paper, find everything I want to watch, program those in, and then search the channels which don't show up in the TV section for jewels like GUNS AND AMMO TELEVISION, and THE SURGERY CHANNEL from the Univ. of Washington, scrolling through just a portion of the on-screen program guide. Scolling through everything would result in MEGO (Mine Eyes Glazeth Over) as the $33/mo package has about 60 usable channels (subtracting GodSquad & other informercial stations as well as the digital music channels).

    These Yahoo Groups will be informative:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dishmo d?yguid=211070 63
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DishPlayer_Explo rer? yguid=21107063
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dish rip?yguid=211070 63
    as will USENET groups:
    rec.video.satellite.dbs
    alt.dbs.echostar
    alt.dbs.echostar.hack

    DISH allows you 'superstations'; I can get WB and UPN feeds from LA, NJ & Boston. Handy when there's counter-programming going on (like NBC pitting 'West Wing' against 'Angel'); I just record the WB programming from the east coast and get the NBC show from the west coast. LA local news is also a hoot, and NJ news (99% NYC news) is useful.

    Oh, yes, both DISH and DirecTV offer 'locals'. Local station bandwidth is not as great as movie channel bandwidth, and if that vexes you, both have HDTV channels. However, should you tell DISH your kid moved to an area without Grade "B" coverage (i.e., Big Spring, TX), but you want to keep paying for the service, they will change the 'service' address and will allow those registered receivers to instead get major network stations on the east coast (NYC) or west coast (LA, IIRC). Bills still go to the 'billing address'.

    Gee, would I rather watch LA news or Podunk IA news, esp. if I have decent off-air reception for when I want local news? Hmmm.

    Having a service address in Cincinnatti and other specific areas is bad news, as you will not have access to the really good gynecological training films. Know what you will get in your 'service address' before signing.

    Self-install is easy. Drill three holes in the south wall, attach the mount, get the mount post VERY, VERY VERTICAL, attach the pizza-pie dish, ratchet the dish around to the right angles, attach the coax and string it over to the receivers. Multiple receivers can require a special splitter available from multiple sources. Multiple dishes, each pointed at a specific bird with signals joined with a combiner ('multi-switch'), yield better reception than one 'does everything' dish.

    Lastly, if you live near the Great White North and have friends en Canada, they can bring down the Bel

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  492. Your signal won't dop out... by whitey311 · · Score: 1

    My Directv dish has been on a fence in my backyard, yes a wobly wooden fence, for 3 years and I live in Buffalo NY. With all the snow and horrible weather we get here, I have never lost a signal, not even once. The receiver says my signal strength is 98% on a clear day, with snow it will go down to no lower than 65, but quality is still excellent. Overall ditch cable, especially if you can get a DTV receiver with HDTV and DVR.

  493. comcast in maryland / dc metro SUCKS by mgoodman · · Score: 1

    comcast sucks big time. lots of areas still use 2 cables to get the damn signal (an A and a B line...).

    they keep cutting good channels....i miss hot brooke burke on the "travel" channel =(

    they did just recently implement that on-demand digital cable, but it really really sucks. frequently digital breakup and color loss are just some of the problems (the only way to restore it is to stop the feed and restart it again)...that is if you can even get access to it...during prime time you're lucky if you can "connect" because they didnt give it enough bandwidth...typical.

    the signal sucks. when i move im getting the dish. can't get it now because of the location and renting policies disallow it.

    the horribly-designed remote control is enough of a reason...the numpad buttons are annoyingly hard to press, because they are shaped like the numbers...sure 8 may be easy, but 1 is a pain in the arse.

    this is regarding comcast in maryland, especially the dc metro area. time warner digital cable in manhatten rocks relative to comcast...

    --
    01100111 01100101 01110100 00100000 01101111 01110101 01110100 00100000 01101101 01101111 01110010 01100101 00101110
    1. Re:comcast in maryland / dc metro SUCKS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with entirely. Directv has amazing customer support and I love their TIVO, as well as the SPorts PackaGes.

  494. TV Psychology experiment you can try by lysium · · Score: 1
    The television, for some mysterious reason, is not quite the passive tool you make it out to be.

    Next time a few friends or family visit your place, have everyone sit in the room with the TV. Turn the television on to one of the blank blue channels, or perhaps even to a paused videogame with a boring static image and no sound.

    Everyone in the room will watch the television even though nothing is on. People will either stare at it outright, or glance continously during conversation. Try it, you'll see.

    =============

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    1. Re:TV Psychology experiment you can try by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you and your friends should not smoke so much of the marijuana cigarettes.

    2. Re:TV Psychology experiment you can try by Hungry+Admin · · Score: 1

      It's true. Television is addictive. When I was a kid, our TV got hit by lightning, and the TV repair man ripped out the high voltage deck and took it back to the shop for a few days. My dad would come home from work, sit in his chair, and stare at the dead TV screen. I hope I never get that addicted to TV...

      --
      Be who you are and say what you feel, because the people who mind don't matter, and the people who matter don't mind.
  495. Go with the dish by turtles11 · · Score: 1

    I've had a dish for 2 years now and I think I had a problem once during an exceptionally nasty snowstorm. Even then, it was very brief. Depending on the programming you want, too. Satellite is usually WAY cheaper.

    --
    "According to the Turtle" www.paperbackreader.com
  496. My DirecTV vs Adelphia Cable experience by kalislashdot · · Score: 1

    I had Cable TV until a few years ago. Here is my experience and why I switched to DirecTV.

    With Cable when it rained it got very staticy due to rain seeping into the crappy cable connections on the poles. Calbe was also very expensive and did not carry very many channels. Finally they got Sci-Fi and then a few months later moved it onto Digital cable so I had to pay even more.

    Digital Cable was great wiht the menu but instead of static, it pixelated sometimes so bad the scrren when totally black. Also the menu guide only filled half the screen, the other half was 2 ads for PPV. I thought it was lame I was paying $60 a month to have ads on my screen.

    I finally moved to a plce where Satelite was an option and I got a DirecTiVo and loved it ever since. Rain. nor wind affects it. A tree did once start to grow in front of it but a few snips and the picture was clear as a bell again.

    I can see wind being a problem if the dish is not aimmed right or not tightened down, but I just paid a guy $60 to install it and he did it all good. Also my Satelite bill is $40 with locals and tivo. No need to premium channels as I have netflix. I get all the channels I want Sci-fi, comedy cnetral, techtv and even the nasa channel. I was super cool watching them land those rovers. Adelphia does not have techtv nor cmoedy central yet.

  497. cable tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dude, where do you think the cable company gets their signals from? satellite! duh.

    so whats the difference if you get it from a bird or they do?

  498. Big Dish by dddno · · Score: 1

    Can't beat Sat. Bad weather is going to be a PITA if you have a small dish- the best amp is a good beam say the HAM's and I guess it hits here too. So get a good dish significantly larger than 1m in diameter, that's best for good reception. And mount it very solidly, avoid any objects in between, even trees... etc etc I'm sure you know that. Don't know too much about sat modes in the US but here in Europe cable usually means offending boredom - if I want any reasonable TV, theres no way around satellite. Subscribing to non-local (i.e. other EU member countries) pay tv packages can be a pain though; thus ... well: I love my box, he he he!

  499. directv + directivo is the best deal by Splork · · Score: 1

    cable companies have a natural monopoly, they own the cables and control who and what goes on them. satellite providers don't (competitors can enter without laying down major infrastructure other than a sattelite launch).

    DirecTV with the directivo is the absolute best deal. It has two tuners so its can record two different things at the same time; this feature is something all stand alone tivo users are very jealous of. tivo is also much better than the homegrown dvr that dish network tries to give you.

  500. To beat a dead horse by a1englishman · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen a single comment that dish sucks, and you should stick with cable. Now, that's interesting. My experience bares with everyone else's. Switched to DirectTV from Cox Cable in Southern California, six months ago. The picture's better, even with the fee for the extra box and local channels, it's cheaper than cable.

    Cox's digital cable service is tiered. There's the family tier, the movie tier, yada, yada. You only get one tier with the base price, then each addition tier is extra. So, if you want BBCA, and IFC, you have to buy two tiers. Not so with DirectTV. The basic fee gets all the bloody channels.

    The real decision is, do you want to get anal electrocution (cable), or a hammock on the beach (dish)?

  501. I'm a DirecTiVo User, This is My Story... by Flamingcheeze · · Score: 1
    I have DirecTV with their TiVo service (built into the tuner) and I absolutely love it. I doubt I'll ever go back to cable.

    One reason: DirecTV is a coast-to-coast standard. No matter where you are, you'll get the same programming (aside from local channels, which will be unique to your area). Including NASA TV.

    Another reason: I hate the cable company. Every cable company I have ever dealth with is a huge pain in the ass. I think it's because they usually have a monopoly on a specific area, and don't give two shakes about customer service. Other people may have different experiences, but I've had major problems with both TimeWarner and Adelphia.

    No matter which service you choose, however, a TiVo/PVR is a MUST. I never thought I could love a piece of equipment as much as I love my TiVo.

    Although the DirecTiVo boxes are cheaper (subsidized by DirecTV), I recommend getting a stand-alone Series 2 TiVo, since it has features that the satellite boxes don't have, such as the Home Media Option and the ability to be hooked up to your home network. If I had it all to do over again, I'd bite the extra-cost bullet for this one.

    --
    The Philosophy of Liberty | lewrockwell.com
  502. Go DSS by jjp5421 · · Score: 1

    If Comcast is the cable provider, go DSS. They are the worst cable company I have ever seen.

  503. I have both Cable, and Satellite(DIRECTV). by llzackll · · Score: 1

    I actually prefer cable over a satellite reciever. The channels you get with cable depend on what area you live in. In my area (Tampa Bay) we have Bright House (formerly Time Warner). I like the channel selection with cable a lot better than that of DirecTV (satellite). DirecTV has a limited selection of premium movie channels like HBO. Cable in my area has many more HBO and other movie channels, so it suits my tastes better. The prices are similar to DirecTV.

    Picture/Sound quality is similar on both. With cable in my area, the first 100 channels are analog, and the rest are digital. Picture quality is good enough on both modes. You are NOT going to get DVD quality picture on any kind of broadcast medium currently on the market (with the exception of maybe HD channels), so keep that in mind. I do notice a lot more digital pixelization with DirecTV though, which is a bad thing on larger TV's. In Florida, where it rains a lot, you WILL lose the signal on DirecTV during the rain. Happens a lot during the summer. This is not a problm with cable.

    Both cable and DirecTV have DVR boxes available integrated into the reciever. Both also have HD channels (depends on where you live if you are using cable). I would actually prefer using secondary PC as a DVR box to eliminate the extra monthly fees.

    You mentioned you wanted NASA TV. I don't think its available in my cable service area, but check yours.. It is available on DirecTV, but it is on a different satellite than the mainstream channels. To get NASA TV, you will need either one of those new elliptical dishes, and a new reciever (any made in the past two years should be fine). Either that, or get two dishes, and one of them will have to be pointed in a different angle.

    The only other real advantage to DirecTV is that it is very hackable if you have one of the older smart cards.

  504. Cable Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work in cable distribution.

    Every rain storm part of the system would fail. Maybe not on your block, but somewhere.

    These days I have a dish. I very rarely see a momentary problem with signal strength in a storm. I've never had an outage of more than 5 minutes. (If the receiver gets screwed up, you pull the card, count to 10 and shove it back in. Bingo, you're up!)

    Stay away from Cable!

  505. Pegasus by crayiii · · Score: 1

    I'm in rural Oregon and have to use pegasus satellite for my directv programing. They charge more and directv still sends me a monthly bill for the PVR. No local programing to boot!

  506. 5 room DirecTv system with TIVO for $50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you decide to go with Satellite check out... http://www.expertsatellite.com/ they have a great deal. I just had 5 rooms installed in my house and that TIVO is awesome!

    Have fun!! :)

  507. DISH. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    1. I have a DISH for over 3 years now. Even with the big storm the east Coast got last week, I had perfect reception. The only time I can remember losing a signal, was in the summer once or twice for 10 seconds BEFORE the storm actually came. Since getting the DISH 500 I have never lost a signal.

    2. You can't as far as I know, use a Tivo you bought at the Wal-mart. Well not at least how you'd want to use a Tivo.

    3. DISH requires a Credit card or a Checking account now in order to get the free install. This sucks, but too many people were trying to get free DISHes when the had been previous customers.

    4. Locals, DISH has the most locals of the DBS companies. I just got mine and the two which they have a direct optic link to are perfect, the others, which they get Off the Air, are good but you can tell. I blame the locals for not allowing the direct conenction though. It's in the best interest of the locals to play nice with the DBS companies but they all seem to be bought and paid for by the cable companies.

    5. Don't fall for any 'deals' that the cable company may make. Winbacks and the like are nice for 3 months but ask what your bill will be like in a year. DISH had for three years, price locked their services, and my last price increase was 2 bucks. I dare you to find a cable company that hasn't raised rates in the last 5 years.

  508. Satellite provides better quality by spideyct · · Score: 1

    If you care about picture/sound quality, satellite is definitely the way to go. I used DirecTV for a couple years and got used to "digital" tv (not HDTV). My local cable company offered a great promo to try out their "digital" cable. They offered the hundreds of channels that you get with satellite, and it looked like a good deal, so I gave it a try.

    What they don't tell you (at least the 2 cable services I tried in Boston and Austin), is that the majority of the channels are NOT digital - just the extra channels that you can't get through regular cable. So ESPN, MTV, Comedy Central, etc (the most popular cable channels) - none of them are digital, and the picture/sound quality suffers very noticably.
    With satellite, EVERY channel is digital.

    (Oh, and how does the cable company get away with advertising digital cable and state that satellite requires you to pay a fee per TV? It is true, but they fail to mention that you also have to pay a fee per TV for digital cable converter boxes).

  509. Sat Porn on DISH (was Re:DirecTV *does* have pr0n) by xski · · Score: 1

    Not just the HBO/Skinimax R rated soft-core crap, but real honest PORN.

    Yeah, its 'real porn', but they always cut the money shot for some reason... Like its ok to have closeups of penetration and knob slobbering, but some chick taking a wad to the face is a no-no...

    Go figure.

    Anyhoo, to add something useful to the discussion, I've had a DishPlayer PVR 7200 (the 2nd one that shipped with a whopping 17G disk). I slapped in a 40G and I'm quite happy with it. No limits on timshifting AFAIK. It tends to just work. As for outage due to whether, I'm in Portland OR which I think is 2nd only to Seattle for crappy weather (in the US -- the Brits prolly beat us both) and I rarely see signal loss. Certainly not enough to bother me.

    Since I've had it, I've only rarely watched live TV. Everything is recorded and watched later, at my leisure and I go to the can when I damned well feel like it. I'd pretty much given up on TV watching until this thing came into the house.

    Oh and if you U/G the disks, make sure you get drives rated for A/V use. I burned up a couple standard WesternDigital 40G drives before getting the word on that. Since then, its been smooth sailing.

    -xski

  510. Down here in the sunny tropics... by hummassa · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here in Belo Horizonte (somewhat highland of Southeastern Brasil), in the "monsoon" season (high summer, from xmas to late january) I get many thunderstorms (10 to 20 days/year), and we stay 1-2h each time without sat tv signal (SkyTV).
    I'm lucky, cause I live really high in the city next to the hills where the local tv antennae are situated, so I have good reception even without an aerial antenna. And more, I am a cable subscriber to have internet, so I have the "minimum package" of tv from the cable co. ...

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  511. No weather issues for me by katorga · · Score: 1

    I moved to a rural location last year and got DishNetwork satellite TV. So far weather has had a marginal impact on the use of the product. Basically, if its raining hard enough for me to lose satellite I am either going to lose power shortly or the weather is so bad we are already heading to the storm cellar.

    Average, everyday rain has no impact on the product in my experience.

    Ironically, I previously had timewarner cable at my old house. I lost cable service EVERY time it rained more than .5 inches. But, no matter how windy it got, I maintained cable service, unless that wind was accompanied by rain.

  512. Here's an idea by jhylkema · · Score: 1

    Neither.

    To put it another way, get past your TV addiction. Read a book or listen to some real music (no, the latest indie band or rap crap doesn't count) instead. Trouble is, those activities require an attention span, something TV robs you of!

    RANT: If more people did those things, and if our schools taught people to be free thinkers rather than obedient sheep (when they're not grubbing for money), then we likely wouldn't be in the mess we're in!

    I find it interesting: the/.ers who caterwaul and bitch the most about the *AA and Hollywood are the first ones to gladly pony up their scarce money for LOTR, Star Wars, etc. In the latter case, George Lucas is Mister DRM!

    I'm sure I've committed blasphemy and will be modded into oblivion, but what the hell, I've got karma to burn.

    1. Re:Here's an idea by rengav · · Score: 1

      While I agree with you on getting over the TV addiction. I find your comments on what schools are teaching to be highly offensive. I am a teacher. I teach my kids to be free thinkers. I only have their kids for an hour a day, they have them for several hours in the evening. If the parents of my students would turn off the TV and get their kids to read, or better yet if the parents would spend some time each evening that they have at home with their kids, checking on homework, interacting, etc., we might see a change in their attitude.

      As for your money comment, I spend most of my "money grubbing" time, trying to get money to buy materials for my class, not for myself. I will be lucky to have $250 for all 150 of my students to buy chemicals and replace glassware in my Chemistry classes.

    2. Re:Here's an idea by jhylkema · · Score: 1

      I stand by what I said about what schools are teaching. So much of education nowadays (starting in preschool and continuing into higher ed and beyond) is devoted to obedience and social indoctrination. Think I'm kidding? Write a paper agreeing with, say, the NRA and see what happens. That is, if the student can even write a paper without the help of inventive spelling, whole language, or other somesuch educrat trendy bilge.

      I do, however, fully appreciate your struggles as a teacher. While there are some bad teachers who need to be promptly given the sack (impossible because the NEA protects incompetents), you guys are, on the whole, grossly underpaid and underappreciated.

      Education underfunding is a myth - education receives more money than anything else, bar none, in this state. Trouble is, it all gets eaten up in administrative overhead. Case in point: The Seattle School District just promoted its deputy superintendent to superintendent. This was after spending $60,000 on a search firm and almost hiring a candidate who had run two previous school districts into the ground. My "money grubbing" comment was referring to the Seattle School District's levy election tomorrow. I will be happy to vote "HELL NO!" Why? It won't go to the teachers - it will all go to the suits in the head shed. If you always do what you always did, you always get what you always got. It doesn't matter anyway, they'll just re-run the levy ad infinitum until it passes. When it passes, the suits will give themselves a raise while teachers like you have to buy art supplies, etc., out of your own pocket. Ridiculous!

  513. DirecTV rain and branch shadow real by Jerry · · Score: 1

    I tried direcTV to save money. When I installed my the cost was 19.95/month for 75 channels, most of which were shopping channels. About a dozen were of the kind I liked. A few months later they went to 100 channels, plus some digital features, and doubled the subscription fee.

    I used to install and tune sat dishes and I tuned my installation to maximum signal strength on the weakest transponder. Some transponders are more powerful than others so the max sig strength varies from channel to channel.

    When ever severe weather blew past and the clouds were heavy with rain ALL of the channels pixelated and then went blank. This was especially annoying if there were threats of tornados in the area.

    Another problem was tree branches and leaves blocking signals. Even though I trimmed the limbs away to give the dish a clear view of the satellite there were occassions when during strong winds branches would be blown infront of the dish line of sight. This caused annoying pixelation, signal lost, signal hunting... over and over and over.

    Another problem was snow and ice buildup on the dish surface and detector components. This would produce a gradual loss of signal strength until pixelation got so bad I'd have go out and use a hair dryer to melt it off.

    I'll never return to Satellite TV again unless I move out into the desert away from a cable system.

    After about a year I disconnected by DirecTV dish and went back to TimeWarner RoadRunner cable. During the last two years I can recall only one outtage which occured when lightening struck some substation and put it off line for about ten or 15 minutes. During the last year TWRR has increased their download speed from 2Mb/sec to 3Mb/sec without raising the price.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

    1. Re:DirecTV rain and branch shadow real by Monkey · · Score: 1

      To combat the snow/ice build up problem, I painted my dish/LNB flat black. When the sun shines it heats it up enough to melt any residual ice/snow. I also think it looks cooler than the original drab gray.

  514. Neither by Space_Soldier · · Score: 0

    Get a fast internet connection, install Azureus (the best BiTTorrent client) and get your TV shows from the net. Good quality, fast downloads, and comercial free. Some shows you can see them sooner, like Stargate which was released almost two weeks later on Scifi compared to Sky One in UK. It is the same for movies. Out of all the movies released this year, only those that made it onto the oscar list are worth going to the cinema and paying to watch them. Why pay to watch rubbish? This encourages for more crappy movies to be made! $2 million from one crappy movie, $1 from another; they still get rich. In Canada you can pay 75 cents per channel, and select only the channels you want, here if you want 1 hbo channel you have to pay for 100 crapy ones. Even hbo is useless, takes 1 year before a new movie reaches them. Get a book, go out see theatre, bars, restaurants, museums, screw TV. GOOD STUFF IS WORTH PAYING FOR, BAD STUFF ISN'T AND WE STILL WATCH BAD CRAP 'CAUSE WE ARE ADDICTED TO THE TELLY. News channels are crappy too, you waste hours to get the news. The story is comming up after the brake.....brake.....welcome back, now they are talkinga about something else....30 min...now you the story that you wanted to see. It is better to go to the webpage and get the story in 2 sec, even audio/video on some sites.

  515. Re:$43 is "cheap" now? by dbirchall · · Score: 1

    Wow. Out here in the unfashionable backwaters of the Pacific, where our little TV set's antenna pulled in basically nothing on the airwaves, we're getting somewhere around 40 channels (that's about a half-dozen broadcast stations from the nearest big city, 200 miles away, plus about 4 local public/educational/government access channels, and about 30 cable-only channels... for about $10-$11 a month. And that's after a rate increase last year. ;)

  516. DISH rocks by bandy · · Score: 1

    1. Buy the integrated PVR - that way you skip a D->A step, as they record the digital signal off of the bird.

    2. Getting satellite TV is like getting a new tv, in terms of picture quality over cable. I kid you not. I thought my TV was going to crap. No, it was the local cable plant and all the junk cable in my attic.

    3. NASA Select. Live coverage of shuttle launches and landings [R.I.P. Columbia, Challenger], something you don't get with Discovery Wings

    4. Discovery Wings - 24/7 jet noise programming.

    5. A kajillion versions of HBO/SHO/TMC/etc., both east coast and west coast feeds.

    6. Local channels in crystal-clear reception.

    --
    "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
  517. DirecTV/TiVO by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

    I used to use Charter Communications with their cablemodem in California. The service was identical to Time Warner/BrightHouse/RoadRunner in Florida, down to using the same boxes, and the same sorry support.

    I bought a Hughes DVR2 (sometimes called DVR3), which is a DirecTV receiver with two connections to the dish (I'll explain more in a minute). I also got the oval dish, with two seperate LNB's, but it has expansion space for the third LNB, should I want to hook it to a HDTV (I don't have one yet).

    The bills are very reasonable. I get all the local channels and cable channels for about $100/mo.

    I upgraded the receiver with a 140Gb hard drive. From what I gathered on the Internet, that's as big as the BIOS on the box supports, but you can put in a second hard drive as well. As it is right now, I have over 100 hours of recording time, and it would almost be trivial to add a second 140Gb drive. As it is right now, we have weeks worth of stuff recorded.

    I strongly recommend the O'Reilly book, "TiVO Hacks". There's lots of fun things you can do with it. I'm working on getting network connectivity to mine, so I can copy movies off to DVD to watch later. :) You can watch recorded shows and movies on your Linux or Windows PC using a modified version of mplayer. If you do both, you may not ever get any more work done again. You can watch soaps at work.

    I have absolutely no complaints about reception. It's been perfectly stable even in rain and wind. That's much better than my "digital cable" service was. Movies would always get blocky or go blank, and they just said that was normal.

    If you live in the Northern US, you may wish to buy a larger dish. My friend who owns dssaccessories.com sells bigger dishes, and de-icers if you're in a frozen wasteland or something.

    I really enjoy watching tv shows that are on when I'm not home, or forget to sit down and watch. I can sit down at 2am and watch my favorite shows, rather than bitching that I missed an episode. The downside to this is that now I've seen every Simpsons and Futurerama, so now I see the description, know I've seen it, and just delete it.

    TiVO absolutely rocks for watching TV though. If you pause for a few minutes at the beginning of the show (get a beer or whatever), you can then skip through the commercials through the whole show. It's definately better than watching 8 minutes of commercials every 10 minutes. I didn't realize how short shows really are. Now I watch a 1 hour show in about 1/2 hour. If someone calls, I just pause the show, and I can rewind a few minute (up to 30 minutes) to catch back up with what they were saying. The day I hooked it up, my friend watched the "Fanta" commercial over and over frame by frame, and insisted that the girls were saying "want to f***". I could see it but only after hours of seeing her do it. We're easily entertained.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  518. Satellite tv and trees by Prlwytkovsky · · Score: 1

    One of the worst companies I had to deal with in the past is Comcast. These people are RUDE. Unfortunately there are a lot of high trees around my house. Are there any people who know how badly trees degrade satellite reception ? Would a bigger disc help ?

    1. Re:Satellite tv and trees by UrGeek · · Score: 1

      A chainsaw would help a lot better!

  519. DirecTivo works for me by zeke-o · · Score: 1

    I was a long-time Dish Network customer until this past christmas .. my receiver (bottom of the line) crapped out and they demanded $80 for a replacement. Turns out the problem wasn't really the receiver but the smartcard, and the gyrations necessary to get them to turn on the "borrowed" smartcard were insane. Given this experience and all my prior bad experiences .. I was also an early Starband adopter, which is another story :) ... I abandoned ship. For $99 I got a 40GB Samsung DirecTivo, dual receivers, very nice. I like Direct's user interface better also, although I'm not sure if I'm looking at the normal Direct interface or Tivo's version ..

  520. Satellite OK, except for heavy snowing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wind and rain with satellite is not really a problem (well, unless you get a tornado, but then you might not have house anymore to watch TV).

    The only occasions I lost signal was under heavy snowing -- and using older equipment.

  521. Love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can have my Hughes DirecTC Tivo Sat Tuner when you pry it from my dead, cold hands...

  522. Are there large multi-sat dishes? by raygundan · · Score: 1

    I'd like a slightly larger dish to pad my signal a bit "just in case," although I have yet to lose my picture.

    I've got the triple-LNB three-satellite dish from DirecTV-- is there any sort of third-party replacement for this? Or would I be stuck trying to convince my girlfriend that three 30" dishes really DO make the house look nice?

  523. Cable has been good to me! by ivakegg · · Score: 1

    I can only say that COMCAST Digital cable has been good to me. I am not happy with the cost, but support has been good (maybe I am lucky). I addition, I am building my own TIVO (sourceforge.freevo) which works great for the first 100 channels, but cannot get the others unless you decode through comcast of course. I do not know if Direct TV solves this however using their TIVO box probably does!

  524. Rain & Snow by jsrjsr · · Score: 1

    I've had DirecTV for about 4 years now. During that time the signal has degraded because of weather 4 or 5 times that I recall. Once I had to go out and remove snow from the dish. The other times were during REALLY good thunderstorms (nearly dark and droplets big enough to look like hail when they hit the ground). I did have to cut down some weeds last year...

  525. AC Was Wrong. But You're an Idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    i caught myself racing home from work so i could watch the A-Team re-runs at 3:00 on tbs. ... if you choose to sit in front of a tv and be programmed to talk, think, and feel the exact same way as millions of other people...you are giving up your free will, and subverting it for the opinions, feelings, thoughts, and ideas that are being spoon fed to you through the television.
    The previous poster almost had you nailed, but he was a bit off the mark. You're not a "chic rebel." You're a fanatic.

    You're no different than the teenaged ELF terrorists who firebomb SUV dealerships. You're exactly like the PETA psychos who storm three-star restaurants and spraypaint fur coats. A fanatic is a fanatic is a fanatic, and you're a fanatic.

    You're right: planning your life around the A-Team was sick. You were indeed using television to fill a void in your empty little life, and that's quite unhealthy. But what you're doing now is no different: You've simply replaced watching the television with ranting about it. You're still obsessed with something that detracts attention from other aspects of your life -- only instead of being obsessed with something neutral, you've replaced it with a great deal of negativity. And clearly, from the tone of your posts in this thread, your paper-thin superiority complex is doing nothing to counterbalance that negativity.

    You're right: America would be nuts if everyone were allowing television to subvert their free will. Problem is, that isn't the case -- and you're the nut, for believing otherwise. You were a sick puppy, stressing yourself out to catch reruns of a 20-year-old show. And today you're like the recovering alcoholic who insists there's no such thing as a "social drinker." To him, everyone who drinks must be an alcoholic. Likewise, to your pathetically egocentric view of the world: You couldn't watch television without becoming obsessed, therefore no one else can, either.

    You haven't grown. You haven't matured. You certainly haven't recovered. You've simply replaced one drug with another. And whatever time you may have gained with your friends and family, you've certainly cost yourself plenty of goodwill with your ten-cent attitude that forsaking TV entitles you to a step ahead of everyone else.

    1. Re:AC Was Wrong. But You're an Idiot. by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      err... yeh... giving up tv is just like firebombing a car dealership...

      how many hours of tv do you watch a week, and why are you so violent in defending it?

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
  526. 8 years DirecTV: no regrets by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
    I laugh when I hear or see the cable commercials because they know their days are numbered. Their "proof" against satellite is greatly overexagerated or completely fabricated.

    From my own experience, I was on cable (pre-digital days) for years. From time to time we would lose service. It got so bad we finally started keeping track. One month we had been without service for a total of a week (this was only when we were home from work). My wife sent our list of dates and times of outages to the cable company with only 75% of the payment and stated "cancel our subscription." We bought a DirecTV system secondhand and we've never looked back.

    Does the weather affect the signal? We live in Texas, and only the most torrential rains of thunderstorms will degrade or cause a loss of our signal. Once in the past 8 years solar activity caused a loss of signal for about 15 minutes. Other than that, we always have a crisp, clean picture.

    I can guess where some of the exaggerations cable tells come from. If a dish is not mounted properly, the wind could blow it off signal line. If the inclination is too high, it could collect snow or water and lose signal reflection. My retort for cable companies is, "Okay, weather may have an adverse affect on dishes. It's apparent what causes the problem when it happens. What is cable's excuse for losing signal? Earthworms? Tectonic shift?"

    Satellite has no hidden costs. Just like any product, you'll see ads promising such and such for a certain price. Any smart consumer knows to ask all the right questions before approaching the checkout line. Anyone just blindly buying a product as advertised deserves what they get.

    Pay extra for local channels? Not really. Dish and DirecTV have bundled local channels into packages. Yes, you're paying some extra, but it's not $5 as most people say. I pay $2.50 for 9 local channels.

    Pay extra per receiver? Yes, just like the mobile phone services, you pay for how many devices are receiving the service. I don't even know how to answer the other allegations cable has because I've never heard of them. Insurance? Service fees? Outlet fees? Never seen any of them.

    I have little experience with DVRs, but I can support what others have said. TiVO works well with almost any satellite receiver. You have all the choices you want in selecting equipment, however, know that you will not receive any package deals.

    If you choose some $99 multi-room, installed deal, you'll get basic receivers with no frills. However, if you do some research of which service you choose and which equipment is preferred, you'll have a wide variety of choices: basic receiver, 5.1 Dolby receiver, receiver with DVR, HDTV receiver, or some combination of those options. (HDTV with DVR is on the horizon.)

    When you buy any of these receivers, you'll receive a package of how to sign up for the service. Some stores may offer a sale price if you sign a 1 or 2 year contract. Go ahead if you're comfortable with the committment and it saves a large amount.

    As for which service, DirecTV and Dish both have pros and cons. DirecTV has sports packages that Dish does not. Dish has some channels that DirecTV does not. For instance, the Nasa channel you mentioned is only available on Dish. While DirecTV does provide regional sports channels, sometimes a blacked out game may be pushed to an alternative channel which you may not receive, but Dish does. Likewise with HBO and other movie packages, Dish may offer more alternative channels within those packages. Digital cable may offer similar advantages, but all the drawbacks to cable make it a no-brainer for me. Research both services websites. They provide great detail of their package listings. I personally prefer DirecTV because the interfaces (receiver dependent) are newer-looking, better organized and have extra options (searches and block lists) that I have yet to see on multiple Dish receivers.

    Good luck.

  527. $100/mo for Comcast dig cable + internet by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
    I'm pretty sure we're paying about $100 per month for Comcast "basic" digital cable, a single box, a cable modem, and ISP services. We experienced a nearby lightening strike the first week we had it, and the cable modem got toasted. Comcast came out within a day and replaced it. The internet side goes out occasionally (every 2-4 weeks or so), but comes back after I reset everything (cable modem, router, switch). I can't say for certain if this is the fault of Comcast, the cable modem, or the router. We have no premium channels, but their version of "on-demand" PPV, where "high demand" movies start every half hour or so. I sure wish the would put Discovery Wings on the "basic" package!

    On the internet side, speed is good, but I don't recall the actual numbers. When RH releases a new kernel, it takes me less than 45 min to download (including source) and reboot. Comcast subcontracts newsgroup access to Giganews I'm allowed 1 Gbyte per month on the NNTP side. Anything over the limit eats into the next month's allotment, any "unused" limit does NOT carry over. Refreshing NNTP headers counts as traffic, so if I just sit around and hit "refresh", I'll eventually use up my entire month's allotment of bandwidth, but my headers would be right up to date! ;-)

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  528. Sat T.V is great for me... by SubTexel · · Score: 1

    As for the quality of Satalite T.V, mine is great. (Dish Network) I havent lost any signals (3 snow storms, and a heck of a lot of rain storms) since I got my setup. (Back in November 2003) Of course my signal is maxed out for both satalites (119E and W) =) The overall package is nice (I pay 54.00 for the top 100 plus all the HBO and Cinemax channels) I havent tried their DVR yet, but they are offering a HD DVR package with a HD T.V for $999, just have to convince the wife. ;)

  529. Satellite Quality by Imagix · · Score: 1

    OK, I'm in Canada and use Starchoice, but I think the "satellite is useless if it rains hard" excuse is somewhat overblown. I've had my satellite signal degrade far enough that I had to do anything about it a total of about 4 times (over approx 3 years). Once was due to the object the dish was mounted to was collapsing (resulting in the dish pointing at the ground), an the other 3 times was due to snow piled up on the dish. Heavy rain only degrades my signal from 5-10 points (where I'm usually around 80, and the picture doesn't seem to degrade until under 50....).

  530. DIrect v Dish programming options by coltrane679 · · Score: 1

    Forget cable, period. Check out http://steve.dbstalk.com/dbs/packagecomparison.htm Overall, Direct is better for sports (they have exclusives on the NFL & MLB packages, if that interests you), while Dish is better for movies--they have several good channels Direct does not have. Both are MUCH better than Comcast, out local provider.

  531. Any Japanese Language Feeds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently looked different content providers and couldn't find any that have Japanese feeds. I thought that Dish Network used to carry one, but it appears that they don't anymore.

    Anyone else like to watch Japanese TV in the US (Austin, TX). How?

  532. Ahh, I remember when... by aexandria1 · · Score: 1

    I got my first dish. Luckily I used to to shield me from EMP when the transformer blew up outside.

  533. Cable or Sattelite?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My household has used cable since around 1989. We decided to get Digital cable around 2002 and that did not last long. Alot of cable companies arent supplying analog cable anymore, they are trying to get rid of it in fact. Most providers charge an arm and a leg for Digital Cable service. So what did we do to lower cost, we got sattelite. We chose DirectTV Sattelite which provided more channels at a much lower price. When there is a horrible storm yeah the screen may get pixelated but in all seriousness, I had the same problem with digital cable seeing as some places distribute their cable through sattelites anyway. It rains alot here (NYC) and i would say within the past 2 years it only got messed up about 3 times and the signal would always come back in a short time. I would check out sattelite.

  534. comcast will never get another cent from me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was quite happy with comcast until I had a problem trying to order a pay-per-view movie. Short story, they told me the problem was on their end, and I wouldn't be charged. So, I figured that was it. When the next cable bill came, not only was I charged twice for the movie, they had charged me for a service visit. So I call them and say I never asked anyone to come out, but they said someone apparently let them in which did happen. I had even told them originally that I had no problems with my digital cable box. So after getting nowhere with comcast, I decided to call the Massachusetts cable regulatory board and apparently cable providers can come and service your cable system at anytime they choose with or without your approval. Finally, I did get comcast to drop the pay-per-view charges, but the whole episode left a very sour tast in my mouth.

    Afterwards, I switched to Dish Network and have been very pleased with it. I feel like I'm getting more channels for about the same cost as cable. They are extremely straight-forward with their pricing. The picture and reception are great 99% of the time, although I will admit that I have had occasional signal loss for 5 - 10 seconds usually and for a couple minutes once or twice.

    Of course except for the time, comcast apparently decided to "service" my cable system and cut the coax from my dish to one of my receivers and then just left. This happened even though any moron could see the coax to my place was not even connected to the cable feed from the street.

  535. Direct TV ... no complaints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have DirectTV with Tivo... great package ...great price....AWESOME picture quality! It really blows me away that it has been encoded and still has this awesome of a pic quality. I can see things so crystal clear (60inch Rear Projection Phillips HDTV) that I am amazed it is coming through as a non-HDTV signal. The interface is excellent because it is pre-integrated (between DTV, the IRD, and the TIVO) and makes selecting shows to record super-easy. That crap about the signal fading is bull. The cable companies WISH DTV signals sucked a tenth as much as they complain. Plus think about this.... the signal picked up off the satelitte has no other funky feedback signals from everyone else on your block plugging their boxes into old wiring (the cable lines included). I have seen a few digital cable system's pictures and remarked "this is digital -- peeeyeeew" I would always pick satellite over cable (five years now).

  536. Comcast commercials suck [Stupid people bother me] by sowellfan · · Score: 1

    I don't know how many other Slashdotters this bothers, but Comcast runs a lot of commercials in our area that focus on how difficult the DirecTV dish is to install. The families that they use for the focus of the commercials leave me dumbfounded as to how people can be so stupid that they can't follow a few directions.

    One commercial has this single guy complaining that the dish instructions wanted him to put the dish mounting rod in a bucket of cement. He says, "Where am I going to mix cement? I live in an apartment." So it shows how he rigged the dish onto a small bookcase or shelving unit, and then put the whole deal on his porch. Of course, the wind knocked it over without any trouble whatsoever, and this guy thinks it's DirecTV that's got the problems. Well, the problem is that you are too stupid to figure out how to mix a little bit of cement in a freaking bucket, you idiot. You go to Home Depot, talk to a man in an orange apron, and he'll show you what to do. A bucket, cement mix, water, and a stick to mix it with, maybe, and be sure not to eat any, as it is not the paste that you, no doubt, devoured in elementary school.

    Another commercial talks about how the guy had to hook up the satellite dish kind of far away from the TV that he was hooking it to. So in order to find out if he was catching the signal, his wife talks about how he had to set up an elaborate system of mirrors so that he could see the television to tell if the dish was pointed in the right direction. Whatever happened to having your wife yell to you when the signal is right? No, I guess that isn't an option, you probably have her and all of your children busy holding up mirrors.

    These are just a couple of examples of the idiots that the marketing people at Comcast think the general public will identify with, and that really causes me to be worried about the intelligence of the general public.

  537. DirecTV experience by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

    I've had DirecTV for 6+ years. Normally, every channel comes in with the same perfect reception. The only problems I've had are 'rain fade' where I lose reception (down to nothing) just before the rain starts to fall when a heavy downpour is starting. My dish is over some bushes, so sometimes birds will gather around the dish for a second or so and knock it out. A plane flying by will also kill the feed for about a second (very uncommon). My reception is only knocked out for a second or so 1-2 times per week. Half hour outages 1-2 times per year. 30 second outages about 6 times per year. Heavy snow does not do anything to my reception. I'm in Kansas City, so my dish angle doesn't allow for any buildup of snow or rain. DirecTV customer service is quick. I added HBO and had it turned on before the call was over. You can also add channels via the net.

    I've always had problems with cable. Signal strength drops because of cable thieves or frugal cable company turning down the power. Cut or fallen cable lines or mistaken disconnects take 24+ hours to fix. It takes big lying balls for cable providers to claim you'll get a better and more consistent feeds from them.

    TiVo service only adds $5 per month. Before you sign up for DirecTV, you need to know that their TiVo package doesn't include Home Media Option (HMO) that you may want for transferring DVR material between receivers in different rooms. Not because of any incompatibilites, but because DirecTV are Hollywood Whores (TM) that refuse to add it. I'm personally looking into other providers over this issue.

  538. NASA-TV by Grayswan · · Score: 1

    Dish Network carries the NASA-TV channel as part of its basic package. DirectTV does not, according to their website. It looks like ComCast here doesn't have NASA-TV either. YMMV.

    --
    If you open your mind too wide, people will throw trash in it.
  539. My DirecTV Notes by Maxwax · · Score: 1

    I've had DirecTV for about two years now in the suburban Maryland / Washington DC Metropolian region. My roommates have comcast land-line cable via the local comcast franchise. So I've seen both and I'll report on my experiences.

    1) Picture quality. I consider the picture quality of my DirecTV system and my roommate's comcast digital cable to be about the same. 98% of the time the picture is excellent and I'm impressed with the sharpness and colors on my Sony 27" Triniton. The other 2% of the time the broadcast provided to DirecTV by the supplier (such as TBS Superstation) is low-quality and pixellation and color problems are noticeable. Note that I can see the same problems with either digital cable or DirecTV when the supplied programming is low-quality. For things like HBO original content, the picture quality is excellent!

    2) Viewing Experience: I have two DirecTivo units -- Tivos designed specifically for DirecTV satellite signals -- and I couldn't be happier. The combination being able to easily navigate channels, automatically record my favorite shows, record two shows while watching a third and suggest programs to Tivo that it will record onto unused disk space is a joy. I don't watch commercials anymore and I watch what I want when I want. This means sitcoms take about 22 minutes to watch when I skip the commercials, and I can watch West Wing with 2-3 clicks of a remote control while I'm eating breakfast the morning after it's aired. With my two DirecTivos, that's four tuners available at one time and about 200 hours of available on-demand programming.

    3) Cost and Reliability: My DirecTV service costs about $39 a month for basic service and local channels re-broadcast through the satellite dish. I add another $12 for HBO and that's much lower than my roommate's would pay for the same service with comcast. I get a better experience at a lower price. I haven't had ANY downtime with my Tivos or my DirecTV service -- I experience none of the disruption others have complained about during rain or snow.

    4) Comparison to cable: While I've had consistent good experiences with DirecTV, my roommates suffer the pains of our local comcast franchise. Perhaps our local company is not as good as others, but I have observed them going through week-long periods of having to call the cable company and fight their way through to clueful people in order to resolve problems with service. We have a long history of our house of bad experiences with comcast and it hasn't gotten any better.

    I definitely recommend DirecTV -- especially WITH DirecTivo-style Tivo service -- to anyone that asks. Other than the price break you may receive with a land line cable tv + cable internet + phone package, I can't see why anyone would not want the DirecTV setup I have :)

    Disclaimer: I'm an honest guy -- I receive no kickbacks, funds, bribes or other compensation from DirecTV. I'm worried about Rupert Murdoch owning DirecTV and things might not be as good in the future, but I'm happy with them enough to recommend them right now!

  540. rain doesn't cause the signal to go out. by zentex · · Score: 1

    well it does, but not how you think.

    it's when something gets inbetween the DISH and the LNBF, this is where the signal is focused and most suseptibal; such as raindrops, that causes "rain fade".

    to prevent this, you can either put the dish where this cannot happen, or buy a "dish cover".

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  541. DirecTV never goes out by MMHere · · Score: 1

    I've had DirecTV in the Pacific Northwest area, and it has never gone out on me (unless I forgot to pay the bill, in which case it was back on immediately after making a payment with their automated telephone system).

    I know we don't get storms of the same ferocity as, say, the lower eastern seaboard, but we do get our share of bigguns in the winter. Oh yeah, and it rains nine months a year here.

    So the bit about it "going out" is just wrong.

    The only minor complaint I have is this: channel switching is slower than cable, and noticeable. This is due to buffer/lag time while your decoder waits for bits from the bird. Unavoidable.

    P.S.: I like the OSD and browsable channel guide. There are so many channels now that waiting for the cable "schedule channel" to roll over to the station you want can take ten minutes or more! With DirecTV, you can page (or directly goto by entering station number) to the channel whose schedule you wish to see.

  542. DirectTiVo by havoc · · Score: 1

    Get a DirectTV with built in Tivo. You will not regret it.

    When I lived in apartments I was a longtime Comcast subscriber and had a Tivo. When I bought a house I went with two DirectTiVos and droped Comcast (due to poor quality) for everything excpet the local channels (I still have the old TiVo) and internet connectivity.

    I mounted the DirectTV dish at the top eve of my house and ran all new wiring. It took only a couple of hours. Reception is near perfect and it rarely goes out (once last year) and when it does it goes out for only a few minutes (missed about 20 minutes of three seperate shows when it did go out)

    Fast forward. My new room mate works for Comcast, so we now get all of the Comcast channels as well as the DirectTV channels so I can compare them both side by side. DirectTV has a better signal, better quality compression, goes out less, and the TiVo built into the receiver is much more reliable than the TiVo using infrared to talk to the Comcast receiver. The infrared works about 98% of the time... which means we miss 1 out of every 50 recordings which comes out to about a show every two weeks or so. Sometimes it is nothig important like the nightly news and sometimes it is a first run show.

    Comcast's non digital channels are of poor to great quality - depending on the channel. DirectTV's channels are consistantly great. Comcast's signal tends to go out at least a couple times a year. Especially during storms when lines go down. When it goes out it tends to stay out for a couple of hours.

  543. Get DirecTV by Carch · · Score: 1
    I used to have DirecTV with Tivo service in the SF Bay area until I moved to LA. Now I'm stuck with Adelphia--a big building stands between me and the satellites.

    Adelphia internet service has been pretty good for me, but I liked the DirecTV service MUCH better. It was cheaper, more full featured, and had integrated Tivo service. I miss it.

    Oh, and what everyone else said about those ridiculous commercials. Weather had zero effect on my DirecTV signal.

    --
    _/\ - Sturgeon's Law: 90% of everything is crud.
  544. Not necessarily.... by Kris+Magnusson · · Score: 1

    I was television-free from 1995 to 2001. I felt self-righteous about it, too. I read books, rented movies, went to the symphony, hung out with friends, etc. Underneath it all, I was wearing the no-TV hair shirt.

    I made a mistake not watching television for so long--I missed out on some good shows--I could have always turned the thing off when the show was over. Instead, I felt like a hero for resisting the temptation to watch Seinfeld or Star Trek. It was misplaced self-discipline.

    Finally, I figured out that not watching good shows on TV is like not going to good movies or not reading good books. Resist the temptation to wear the hair shirt.

    .............. kris

    --
    "I thought I could organize freedom. How Scandinavian of me."
  545. Cable vs Sat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First time you see a fully Carded system in operation you'll pop a woody that'll last 3 days.

  546. directv "what's playing" menu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    surfing on cable is irritating after being used to satellite where u can always tell whats on

  547. Re:I second the motion by Dot+Com+Drew · · Score: 1

    I live in seattle as well and our DTV signal is awesome. We have DTivo in one room and another regular box in another room. We will probably add a second DTivo box too because we use the tivo so much that the housemates are always fighting over it.

    We got the DTivo package which I thought included our other box. I also believe that we get NASA TV.

    --
    This .sig is .false
  548. My experience with both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where to start...

    Firstly, both are great, and have their advantages and disadvantages.

    It is neccissary for me to describe my local cable setup. I have Charter cable, in which many channels are digital. The set-top box is a Scientific Atlanta #xxxx (I forget the number), and provides good features. When I want to look through the included programming guide, it will use a picture-in-picture function to make the program I'm watching 1/4 of the screen while I browse for another. Many little features like this go into it and I have been much happier with cable than I would have thought before switching.

    Now the downside...Picture quality ranges from "pretty good" to "crap." Now, only two channel's I've seen are crap quality, and it's only crappy sometimes, but it can get pretty bad. The digital channels look OK from where you watch, but if you try to look closely at all you can see pixellization and compression errors. It's not noticeable and soon you tune it out, but it's still there.

    One big plus with cable TV is I get local channels. If you're a news buff, it might be nice to see your local news instead of the New York news.

    On the one hand, DirecTV has better picture quality, across the board, no exceptions. Every channel is compressed at crystal clear near-DVD quality for broadcast digitally. There's a huge selection of channels, ofcourse, and it's nice that you can get say, a Fox on the East coast and one on the West. Because of this I remember being able to see up to 6 different episodes of Simpsons per night (if I was so inclined) ! Or many times if I missed a program I could just catch it 3 hours later.

    DirecTV comes free with a DVR I think if you get a 3-room system, or something like that. I haven't used any DVR so I can't comment on this.

    The downside to DirecTV?
    Every year or so we had to go out and realign our dish. It wasn't the dish's fault, its just that it was on the house so long it was starting to fall off.

    If you point your dish correctly, and there aren't trees in the way, weather won't affect it. Not even the toughest New England snowstorm fazed it.

    Except...snow on the dish itself. This was only a problem in, as I said, the toughest New England snowstorms, and it wasn't any big deal (for me) to go out and tap the dish to make most of it fall off. It usually had to pile up to 3 or so inches on the dish itself - which equates to like 7 or 8 inches on the ground, because it slides off - before it was any trouble with the reception.

    The most important thing with DirecTV I'd say is to mount it to your house correctly. Don't be half-assed, if you do it right you won't have any reception problems at all.

    Well..that's my two cents.

  549. Satellite Rocks by TrekBody · · Score: 1

    When I was choosing between Comcast cable and DSS Satellite in Minnesota, Comcast did not have a published list of what you were getting in their packages (although they would read the list off over the phone). Anyway, a well-aligned dish almost never goes out, I have had much greater problems with cable. There is one top reason though to get DSS satellite. The $99 RCA DirecTivo box with dual receivers. Buddy - once you have dual receiver Tivo you will NEVER go back. Plus only $5 a month for service. There is no better money spent on geek goodness than that!

    --
    Jim - your name is Jim...
  550. Further info and Linux too by xmtrman · · Score: 1

    Satellite receivers are a much better choice than Comcast. In about 1 1/2 years of service from Dish Network I have not experienced any drop outs due to weather, some pretty fierce rain storms blow in off the Pacific during the winter. Only outage was when there was some major glitch in their system that took service down for several days. A receiver went comatose after about a year and a replacement was sent out without any delay. It died within a few days but customer service promptly sent another one out. Call tags for UPS were included for return of the DOA units. Customer support and service has been very good without any delays or being stuck in voice mail hell.

    Current offers of DVR receivers seem to be a good deal but have not gone this route yet.

    In addition to the pay satellite services, you can also receive free digital satellite broadcasts from other satellites. Most notably Telstar 5 in North America. All you need is a receiver, LNB and a 30-36 inch dish pointing in the correct direction. Telstar 5 provides a wide range of programming (both video and audio) from around the world:
    http://www.lyngsat.com/t5.shtml

    There is quite a bit info available on the net for what is termed "free to air" satellite broadcasts. Software tools ( http://www.arachnoid.com/satfinder/index.html)and websites will calculate the proper look angles and such for setting up the dish.

    In the Linux arena a German company offers several Linux based satellite receivers with quite a host of customizable features.

    http://www.dream-multimedia-tv.de/Bereiche/Produ kt e/DM7000_featurelist.php

    There is lot more to satellite programnming and reception than just the pay services.

  551. Hacking... by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    Don't even think about hacking the systems for free service. EchoStar's crypto system is very sophisticated.

    Bullshit. I was running a hacked Expressvu for about a year and a bit with no issues whatsoever.

    A PII will make short work of any encryption that needs to be processed by a smartcard :-)

  552. Thanks For Making My Point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    why are you so violent in defending it?
    See? You're a fanatic. Narrow of mind, narrow of vision, narrow of purpose. You prove that by inferring the above from what I wrote. You interpret everything in terms of the "struggle" you perceive. If someone disagrees with you, they must be an addict defending their cable box.

    Someone who wasn't constricted by fanatical views would have read my post differently. He would have noticed that I wasn't defending television. I was criticizing an idiot.

  553. 950 Responses, and no pro cable posts by SurfTheWorld · · Score: 1

    I've been reading the responses to this thread most of the afternoon (on and off) and have not come across a pro-cable post by anyone.

    I think that says a lot.

    --
    Do it for da shorties
    1. Re:950 Responses, and no pro cable posts by Lobo_Louie · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot! We're wireless you insensitive clod! :-)

  554. I can attest to that! by StringBlade · · Score: 1
    I have had Dish Network since about February last year and it's gone through a complete summer and two very snowy, icy winters in Rochester, NY. I've never had the signal noticably fade while I was watching (and this includes during storms).

    As a matter of fact, one day after a particularly nasty ice storm I checked the dish (mounted on the south side of my roof) and it was covered with about a 1/2 inch thick layer of ice, but the signal I was getting was still above 100 (usually around 120).

    Other friends of mine who also have satellite have not had any problems with inclement weather affecting the signal.

    My only regrets with satellite:

    • no local channels (though that's partially remedied by an on-dish antenna)
    • DVR costs/costed about $500 extra that I wasn't about to spring for
    • need a receiver for each television that you want to tune differently in the house (if you want them to all have the same program at the same time, then one receiver is fine).
    • the guide load time is much slower for satellite than for cable

    My previous bill with Time Warner Cable was $65+ for the standard package (31 channels, analog signal) and with Dish Network it's about $30/mo with two receivers and 50 digital channels. Dish also gives me the PPV stuff that TW never did for their most basic package.

    I'm never going back. But then again, I don't watch an inordinate amount of tv either.

    --
    ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
  555. Five states and seven years by loftydog · · Score: 1

    I've had DirectTV for the last seven years, off and on, in five different states from Baltimore to San Francisco. While I'm not affiliated with any compnay, DirecTV now considers me a "VIP customer" and I'll share my experiences with both geosychronous and gopher based technology.

    Two things first: As others posters have so eloquently said, Tivo and DirecTV is a beautiful, symbiotic creation. There is no reason to consider anything else if you plan on using a PVR of any type (especially if you are a new subscriber due to the fantastic deals on equipment).

    Comcast is, again, Satan's revenge. All the horror stories are true, the customer service is worse, and downtime a corporate mantra.

    Signal loss is not an issue with properly connected and installed equipment. I lost signal once in Colorado during a record snowstorm that had some obscene rate of fall (in the inches per hour range). Otherwise, no outages other than a cable cut by a cable installer (no joke, he was installing in a neighbors unit and tried to split off of what he thought was an existing cable connection) and a ground that went bad.

    Programming availability will be either the same or better than your local cable provider, depending on offerings, and usually more flexible in adding channels a la carte. Prices are better, and you can't get the sports packages anywhere else. I now live in Chicago (still no reception problems) and the only way to see hockey on TV with any regularity is with NHL Center Ice (The NFL Sunday ticket is also fantastic as you aren't stuck watching whatever game the local affiliate is shoving down your throat).

    The decision is yours, but I have now been Satellite consistent for the last 3 years and couldn't be happier. I also pay about 10 bucks a month with local channels, tivo, and an upgraded package than my fiance does for basic cable.

  556. When there is a storm by naoiseo · · Score: 1

    All I know is, there was a storm the other week in Ontario, and our cable went out, the only station I got was off of the airwaves, that being a local CBC affiliate.

    What commercial do I see when I finally find the only non-fuzzy station on the television? - one from my cable provider laughing at the idiots with satellites who's signal goes down in a storm.

    I sat there, with no cable tv, and no Internet (cablemodem down too) gritting my teeth, knowing the gods of Irony would soon shine on my fortune.

    Then I read a book. Sweet release.

    I simply dread the day when my ISP and my TVsp is also my electricitySP.

  557. I liked Dish... by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

    Things I liked about Dish Network. 1. Picture quality was generally better than the cable in my area (Cox). 2. Dish was still working when an icestorm took out the local cable system. Only had to go out once and lightly tap the feedhorn with a broom handle to remove ice accumulation. 3. Better channel selection. 4. PPV easier to use. Things I disliked about Dish Network. 1. Upfront cost of equipment (unless you have good credit and can get a system for free if they have a special going). 2. Have to have a separate receiver for each TV if each TV wants to watch a different channel. 3. No locals available (that has now changed in my area - and it happened right after I moved and sold my equipment...sheesh). 4. You DO lose signal during very heavy rain (mainly thunderstorms...normal rain showers will not affect it if the dish is pointed properly). 5. Have to mount the dish itself and run the cables, unless you spend money and hire someone for install. 6. Have to deal with a national call-center instead of a local office when problems (mainly billing - but few problems occurred nonetheless) arise. Things I like about Cable. 1. No big upfront cost. 2. No need for separate receivers for each TV, unless you get digital cable, which I don't have. 3. Got locals and network channels on same service (available on DISH as well in most markets). 4. Wire all rooms and connect them to a single splitter outside. 5. Local office to deal with when problems arise. Things I don't like about cable. 1. During storms, outages occur which can affect entire town or neighborhood. 2. Less channel choices 3. Typically higher rates than Dish for the same programming (at least in my area).

    --
    You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
  558. Satellite vs. Cable by gregopad39 · · Score: 1

    Do you ever have real bad weather - such as REAL heavy rain, REAL hard wind ? If so you will experience small outages with Sat-TV.

    I've used both - and I quit Dish because they were always calling me to sell crap even though I'm on the no-call list.

    Just like wireless internet vs. dsl and wireless microphones vs. cable microphones - a hard line beats all the others in quality and speed ( but not convenience ).

    I have comcast with internet service - a real bargain and very reliable so far ( 3 months ).

    I'm a former DSL user who got tired of Earthlink's crap - not a very good service.

    Comcast offers the best of both worlds - and will be rolling out HDTV very soon - tho I won't have a receiver to match that for at least a year.

    Also - Sat TV has brief outages when their orbits traverse the solar ecliptic a few times a year.

  559. Comcast censors.. otherwise, enh... by sadomikeyism · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you are any sort of libertarian or otherwise against the Drug War, you should know that Comcast has steadily refused to air commercials for pot legalization groups.

    As for technical issues, I've had satellite tv (DSS, Dish, etc) in several locations, and the thing is that it all depends on how securely you install the dish (have done it myself a couple times without difficulty) and how accurately you aim it. As for weather interference, keep in mind that the cable company gets ITS signal off the satellites too, so any weather that is going to mess up your signal is going to mess theirs up too.

    I am currently on Adelphia digital cable with their internet service as well. I have experienced outages of a few minutes to half a day at least half a dozen times in the last three months since I got the upgrade to Powerlink.

    Objectively speaking, its six of one, half a dozen of the other.

    --
    "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    1. Re:Comcast censors.. otherwise, enh... by mroch · · Score: 1

      This is just a guess, but doesn't Comcast use much larger, more powerful dishes than the ones you stick on your house? These are probably capable of making it through storm clouds and maintaining cable's signal quality while a storm might knock out your satellite feed. Also a guess, but I imagine Comcast has redundancy in that if one satellite feed goes down, another one outside the storm takes over. That's not possible with your own dish.

    2. Re:Comcast censors.. otherwise, enh... by sadomikeyism · · Score: 1
      Comcast does use larger dishes, but your assumption is reverse of true. Big dishes catch more of the wind. They also tend to be set up at higher elevations where weather tends to be more severe. There is also the issue of the cable to my neighborhood being taken out by falling trees. If the dish is on my house, the only way it is getting taken out is if a tree falls right on top of it, at which point, I won't be very interested in watching TV.

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    3. Re:Comcast censors.. otherwise, enh... by PishiGorbeh · · Score: 1

      I use a dish for both TV and Internet since where I live there is no other option. I've tried several configurations and the all suffer from the same problems.. Snow, Rain, and Birds! (Damn those birds) For TV it just causes bad reception but for Data it can really cause havoc...

  560. Quick answer by jridley · · Score: 1

    Sorry if I'm duping others answers, I'm heading out the door.
    The cable companies are full of shit. If your dish is properly installed, outages are very minor. I lose signal maybe 10 minutes a year, when it's absolutely raining like hell. It doesn't even notice normal rain showers, only torrential downpours.
    Also, the picture quality is better on satellite.

    I have Dish Network, if it matters. If I was getting new I'd probably look at DirecTV because of their TiVO tie-in; you can get a 35 hour tivo for about $99 or less when you sign up. Dish has a PVR but no TiVO-like service, even though they do charge you to have a PVR hooked up.

  561. Wind and Satellite don't mix by Dark+Bard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The quality is excellent on satellite but if you live in a windy area I'd be careful. I spent 7 months in Wellington, NZ and the wind was so bad I'd have signal trouble at least once a week and sometimes daily. Generally in was intermittent pixelation but at times it went out for most of the day. When it gets bad enough you simply loose the signal completely. Wellington is an extreme case but if you live in an area with a lot of windy weather I'd consider cable. Otherwise satellite would be my choice. In a pinch if the dish is ground mounted you might be able rig a windscreen. I've heard dense fog will cause problems but wind was my biggest problem. Best of luck.

    1. Re:Wind and Satellite don't mix by IceFoot · · Score: 1
      I disagree. There is nothing inherent about wind that doesn't mix with satellite. A windy location doesn't blow the satellite out of position! The wind won't blow the microwaves off course!

      The only effect wind can have is to blow your dish around so it doesn't point exactly at the satellite. This can be avoided by mounting your dish very, very solidly to something that doesn't move itself, such as the ground.

  562. Re:Mr. Pot? There's a Mr. Kettle on line 2. by pastryp · · Score: 1

    Amen brother! Dealing with Comcast customer service has consistently been a pain in the $#@% for me

  563. Satellite experience by MiniMike · · Score: 1

    DirecTV goes out all the time! Whenever we lose electricity, or if I forget to pay them, poof! it's gone! It's so upsetting.

    Seriously (ok, less un-seriously) I used to have Comcast, now I have DirecTV, and I can't see why I would ever go back (although I only had analog Comcast, not digital). Maybe strong winds interfere with the picture occasionally, but the downtime I've experienced is miniscule compared with cable. Cable goes out when the cable gets cut (3 days downtime for cable in my neighberhood), when the satellite acts up you just have to wait for the wind gust to stop (1-10 seconds, usually).

  564. Cable can also go out in bad weather by ModernCelt · · Score: 1

    Back when I had cable, it also went out in bad weather. When it did, you almost always needed to request a remote reset from the cable company. They had an option for this in the voice mail menus on the Customer Support number, but thunderstorms often knocked the voice mail offline too, and there were no people answering phones evenings and weekends, so a Friday night storm could hose you all weekend. That's what drove me to DSS, it was only out during heavy rain/snow and came back as soon as the storm let up.

    YMMV

  565. Depends on where you live by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1

    In some areas the cable service stinks. Cable in SE Michigan/North Oarkland County is down as much as 10 days in a month with a rare month of uninterrupted service...and it will be a cold day in hell when they prorate billing for missed service. Folks with cable modems and home business's in my neighborhood love reverting to dial-up.

    --
    When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
  566. Sat is way better than cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had ComCast cable, DirecTV and currently use DishNetwork. Of the two formats, Sat wins for quality, packages, number of PPV chanels, etc. etc. etc.

    Of the three providers, I would go with DirecTv and get the dual tuner Direct Tivo. I know this only because my friend has it and compared to my Dish PVR... well, there is no comparision. The dish pvr lacks and is buggy.

  567. DirecTV is not geek friendly: lawsuits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you go for satellite (I use one) then use Dish Network. Cheaper long term and Dish does not try to sue people for owning smart card hardware. Current deal on Dish is a free PVR with your installation - it's worth it since Tivo and Replay won't work with satellite (no prgoram guide).

  568. Dish Network vs Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dish Network had a much better picture on all channels. It had NASA TV. I don't live where it snows so I can't tell you how that would affect the signal. However, once I had the dish aimed properly, so that I got a good signal, I never, ever, had a problem after that. The only down side was that when I click on the Dish Channel changer it is much slower changeing channels then my TV without anything, or my TV with Comcast. So if you channel surf at high speeds, Dish Network will slow you down some.

  569. Nothing is forever by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

    The only constant is change, padiwan.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  570. Pro-cable ads decieve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my experience cable even with a decoder box often broadcasts signals in non digital thus exposing channels to signal and thus quality degredation, when you switch to a dish you might not notice the difference at first. After having the dish for a while however go to a friends house who has cable and you'll notice the image quality difference immediatly.
    Signal loss with the digital satelite services usually only happens in very heavy rain, snow doesnt seem to affect it at all. I wouldnt say that my outage time with both services I had (DirecTV and Dish network) was any more than the outage I had from cable line maintenance.
    Out of the 2 I had I would recommend DirecTV with a good decoder box as that seems to produce the highest quality non hdtv images.

  571. Try them both by grumling · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Get cable first. If you don't like cable, disconnect and get a dish. They usually don't require a long term contract. If you have a really bad experience, just disconnect and get a dish. You'll most likely have to sign a contract, but if you are less happy than with cable, you can usually get a really great deal to go back to cable.

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  572. The Lowdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I used to live out in the country in Southern Alberta where it is _VERY_ common for the wind to blow over 100km/h. Never once did the wind affect the signal quality of our Star Choice satellite service. Every now and then durring a nasty snow storm would the service go out for a couple of hours. This might have happened half a dozen times in 4 years.

    However, we ended up moving into town and converting to Digial Cable provided by Shaw. The picture is good and all but it's the guide that really shows the flaws of digital cable. With one 30min column of shows and slow menus, picking a show gets frustrating quick! The lack of channels for the same price is also harsh. Less than 100 channels compared to 400 for the same 50 dollars a month.

    Another difference is the way Pay Per View works. With both digital cable and satellite you can order right off of the menu. However, satellite requires a telephone connection whereas digital cable uses the coax already running to it. This can be a minor inconvenience if you need the phone.

    The only significant draw back to satellite I can see is the equipment and installation costs. But satellite is by far the best choice IMO.

  573. If you truly want to get nerdy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could get a dish network reciever and a FTA system, hook up two LNFB's to the dish, and get NASA and the other FTA channels and DISH at the same time.

  574. and The West Wing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best thing on network TV.

    gewg_

  575. watch out for the leaf by onShore_Jake · · Score: 1

    I had a dish. It was installed in winter and all was (mostly) well. Snow messed it up some.
    In the spring leaves on a tree in the line of site to the sat completely hosed my signal.

    I refuse to use a technology that can be defeated by a leaf!

  576. Home Game Blackouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In our area the local sports teams games are not shown on cable in an effort to get the local people to attend the games but if you have a dish you just tune to another cities feed to see the game. It this true in all areas?

    1. Re:Home Game Blackouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who has a shitty team like this in their town should stop watching these games altogether. It never fails to amaze me how low major leage baseball will stoop to shake down their fans for as much money as possible.

  577. No price increase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had DTV for 4+ years now, and I haven't gotten a price increase yet. Compare that to cable (Comcast) that's been pumping up prices faster than inflation does.

  578. HDTV Sat $$$ HDTV Cable $$$ by Poppa · · Score: 2, Informative

    HDTV for Satellite will run you at least $500 for the equipment, whereas HDTV on Cable is only about a $5 monthly charge.

    Plus, you get the local channels in HDTV.

    This year there will be Motorola PVR with single and dual tuners. And VOD is also coming within a few months in my area (already enabled in other areas).

  579. I've used both.... by jopasm · · Score: 1

    and satellite wins (at least in my area). It's cheaper, has more available channels, and more reliable.

    As far as the "losing signal when the wind blows" - the only time I ever lost signal on satellite was during a *severe* thunderstorm when the clouds were directly overhead. Generally the signal loss didn't last very long (30 minutes was the longest ever). It would happen 2-3 times a year.

    In contrast my cable did, in fact, go out every time the wind blew *AND* every time there was a storm. See, the cable offices receive the signal they're broadcasting through...a satellite dish! But when the wind started blowing and moving the cable on the poles it cause problems and I usually either totally lost signal or had something totally unwatchable. Another problem is that, in general, the digital cable boxes seem to be lagging behind the satellite boxes so I saw a *lot* more artifacting on cable whereas I rarely saw it on satellite.

    Do yourself a favor and go w/ satellite. I used DirecTV and didn't have any problems but Dish seems to be OK as well.

    --

    ObTagLine: The more you run over the 'possum, the flatter it gets.

  580. bandwidth bandwidth bandwidth by caleugene · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's amazing how much bandwidth a single insulated and shielded 18 gauge copper conductor can handle IMO, cable is the way t go for now. With 256QAM coming in the future, you'll be able to receive 43 Mbps for each 6 MHz wide channel from about 50-1000 MHz. Even with the current 64QAM implementation, there's lots of bandwidth to go around.

    With satellite, the problem really isn't the finicky dish behavior (overly dramatized), but the fact that it's a bottleneck. Currently the DSS providers don't have the bandwidth necessary to broadcast local HD programming. The only way to increase the bandwidth is to launch more satellites. That takes time and money, so if you want local DTV channels, you'll need a plain old UHF/VHF antenna to grab the over-the-air signals.

    Your average HD broadcast is between 15 and 20 Mbps. 15 being 720p and 20 being 1080i. Should 1080p come along, that would roughly double the bandwidth requirement of 1080i. The DSS providers are going to have to resort to more aggressive compression sooner than the cable providers...

    1. Re:bandwidth bandwidth bandwidth by digidemon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Excellent points about bandwidth. Also, for the technical purists out there, you will find most cable systems do not compress digital signals nearly as much as satellite - this lower compression gives you a much better picture. It is true that ALL of their channels are not digital, but I don't care if CNN or Cartoon Network is digital. They did convert the local channels to digital and they look great. I went with cable. Once you got past the basic satellite package, the costs were virtually identical. I have Time Warner cable, (Memphis TN) with a DVR box (costs $5/mo) - which is the greatest. TW just added 4 HD signals this weekend bringing the total here to 10 full time and 2 others that show part time sports. They don't have ESPN HD yet, but said they should have soon. They don't have NBC HD yet, but say NBC is the problem, and say they will have an HD DVR out next month (I have seen one work- yes I hound them on HD, if you don't have HD... well, can you say CGA to XGA) They have video on demand, and 20 of the video on demand channels are free, only the ppv movie channels, hbo, cinemax on demand and porn on demand cost extra. Cable also had more channels (about 320 vs 225) to select from. I also have a cable modem - and have 3mbps download speed, which does hit 2.9 to 3.1 mbps usually any time... at $45, that ain't bad!

  581. TV? by Cyno · · Score: 1

    Why is TV so popular and important to geeks?

    Let's see. There's never anything on. Reality shows are a constant reminder that people will do anything for money. Its main purpose is to advertise to its paying customers. And its mostly just a waste of time.

    I know we are creatures of comfort, but don't you know that TV and the telephone and the people who think these mediums are the future are what is holding us back?

    Without them we'd all have broadband connections, free A/V confrencing/chatting/IM software, and access to all the content in the world. With them we have a few hours of garbage advertisements waiting for us around dinner time every night and the opportunity to always pay less but never get what you want.

  582. DirecTV downtime next to nil by Fireal · · Score: 0

    The same goes with my experiences. I've never had any problems with LOS with DirecTV but Cox Digital is just atrocious. Even during hurricanes Isidore and Lily (back to back, landfall one week apart to the day) back in 2002, I lost signal on my dish for maybe a total of two minutes for both days. Cable, in my experience, has been nothing but bad. I had cable internet bundled with my digital cable and between constant service on the lines, people digging and hitting cables and car accidents where the driver hits a service pole, I just got fed up with cable and got a dish. My whole DirecTV service (including local channels, excluding premium channels (HBO, Showtime, etc)) is less than what I paid for digital cable each month. As far as the Tivo units, I have never had any real desire to use them, so I really can't help you out with that decision. But yeah, it seems the commercials are exaggerating the truth about LOS with satellite. Hell, if I lose signal for a grand total of maybe two minutes during two hurricanes that were one week apart, I think that's pretty damn good.

  583. Poll Option by YukioMishima · · Score: 1

    After reading the posts on here, it's clear that most people have pretty definite opinions on which option is the best. Would it be too difficult to integrate a poll on top of "stories" like this, where readers could add in their opinions when the options are rather limited? Rather than tallying up the responses, I'd like to see how many /.'ers prefer satellite to cable - although, from the posts, it seems that satellite has carried the day.

  584. Re:Tivo is fantastic, but doesn't work for everyth by dpearre · · Score: 1

    this is what i first assumed about tivo when i bought one nearly 2 years ago: that you simply plug the cable feed directly into the box and an internal tuner would change channels.

    the actual process is far more low tech, however. tivo contains no cable tuner, so it intercepts the analog signal sent between your cable provider's box and your television. it changes the channel via it's own "remote" (either a serial connection plugged into the back of the box, or, for the unlucky many, an IR transmitter i had to tape onto the front of the cable box), and records content whenever it's scheduled to do so. tivo is effectively your own private couch potato.

  585. dish/pvr by curiouser · · Score: 1

    i lost signal once - something to do with the foot of snow and ice on my dish. it's been *perfect* other than that.

    pvr may not be as good as tivo, but it's soooo much better than regular tv. i will *never* watch live tv again - every hour of television only takes me 25 minutes to watch now :)

    j

  586. Whatever you do... by rffmna · · Score: 0

    Get a TIVO -- so you can rewind and watch Janet's breasts!!

    --
    -------
    FM Clan
  587. Careful about DirecTV if you like football by pornaholic · · Score: 1

    I've never had a problem with (my roomate's) DirecTV...

    UNTIL THE SUPER BOWL

    I swear I thought it was Comcast attacking the satellites, but whatever caused it - we didn't see the last touchdown of the game, and were worried that we'd miss what turned out to be the final field goal.

    Of course, I'm not really into football, so it was about the funniest thing I've ever seen. 30-something people all in our house watching the DirecTV reconnect to the satellite. Good stuff.

  588. "loosing" connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well then the satelite company needs to get a proofreader

  589. I like my cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have Time/Warner and I am quite pleased with the service. I have had it for over two years and I can not remember an outage for TV or Internet. As far as cost goes it appears to be the same or a little less than dish/dsl plus I get nearly three times more bandwidth coming down to me than dsl.

    DSL 34.99 768/256 + Dish w/locals 50.00 = 84.99
    Roadrunner 2500/256 40.00 + TV 45.00 = 85.00

  590. I doubt anyone will get to this post, but... by skintigh2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In my experience watching DirectTV is like watching movies on a 256-color monitor. I often wonder if DirectTV even has 256 colors. Shadows are a mosaic of grey rectangles, dark scenes look like shit, you can clearly see the key frames every second, etc. Football is the WORST. On long shots, once a second the players look like players, the rest of the time they are a jumble of pixels with an aura of jumbled pixels around them. NOT big screen TV material.

    For all I know digital cable could be worse. I'm sticking with analog cable (which is often free with a cable modem...)

  591. Cable, What Cable? by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

    my vote has to go for satilite. if only becuase I live out in the boonies, where I *Can't get* cable.
    Cable stops about 10 miles down the road, as does DSL, and any other form of supossed "Civilized" communication...

    so I'd say satalite has some big points going for it there

    --
    I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
  592. From the horse's mouth by Sivar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Disclaimer: Until just recently, I worked for DirecTV (left of my own volition for a more flexible job). That said, here is my honest opinion and/or observations about your questions:

    Comcast is the local cable provider in my area, and are playing TV spots about how satellite TV signals can be lost when it rains, when the wind blows, and even when the dog sneezes (I'm sure the dog sneezing excuse in the commercials are more for humor than fact).

    This is bullshit. Many cable companies, including my own (CableOne), make similar statements. Consider the source.
    If your dish is properly aligned, the weather has to be quite severe to interrupt your signal. If it is quite severe, you will probably get signal interruptions, freeze-framing, pixelization, etc.
    A few anecdotal examples:
    My grandmother has a sparse tree (not sure of the species, it has leaves so is not a pine) directly in front of her dish. When I visited during the monsoon season, most of her transponders had a signal strength of 75-85. DirecTV recommends a signal strength of 70 or higher in clear weather to prevent signal loss in trivially bad weather. 80, IMO, is a safer number to shoot for. If you are a true geek, you will probably fine tune it to get it in the high 90's. ;-)

    - I have never lost picture, even in fairly severe snowstorms. I made sure my dish was well aligned though.

    If the dish is poorly aligned usually due to a customer self-installation or due to an installation by Halstedt Communications, an installation company known by DirecTV employees for being almost universally incompetent. Unofficially, of course.

    What has been Slashdot readers' experience with cable and satellite TV? I'm looking at trying to balance cost versus quality of signal and picture. How much does the weather affect the signal quality of satellite TV reception?

    Digital cable and DirecTV have a nearly identical picture quality from what I have seen. Many channels in "digital" cable packages are analog, then you pay to add a set of digital channels on top of the analog base package. Analog picture quality varies based on a great number of factors, and IMO goes from "fairly decent" to "almost as good as pure digital." IIRC, DirecTV's picture is 480^2 MPEG-2 video, but I cannot recall for sure. Digital cable is probably the same or similar.

    Weather does not effect picture quality at all. Generally, you either have it or you don't. Freeze-framing and pixelization can occur with very bad signal strength, but I consider this "not having it at all"

    If all but obviously severe weather effects your satellite signal, call and have your vendor come and fix it. There is no reason that you should have to put up with losing your signal more than during a couple of really bad storms per year, and even then, not for more than half an hour (unless the storm lasts quite a long time).

    Some satellite packages include a DVR (Comcast doesn't offer one yet in my area). Is it worth getting the DVR supplied by the satellite company (DirectTV, DishNetwork), or is buying a separate TiVo a better option? As a geek, I'm also interested in getting NASA TV."

    All vendors' PVRs except DirecTV's are very basic. Tivo is, IMHO, simply a superior service, giving you much more than just recording. HOWEVER, it does have a monthly fee. Some PVR services (the very basic ones) do not.
    A few important notes:
    If you get a Tivo for anything other than DirecTV,
    the recording will not really be digital. Non-DirecTV Tivos are designed to accept an analog signal (to be compatible with a wide variety of TV services), so that analog signal is converted to digital to actually record to disk, then back to analog again for playback. If you have a digital connection from your RV to Tivo, only the one conversion takes place.
    Tivo for non-DirecTV is also much more expensive. $12.00USD per month last time I checked. It is $4.99 for DirecTV customers (whether you use a DirecT

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  593. Cable in Portland by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 3, Informative
    In Portland, we have Comcast. Analog cable is known for having a decent, though frustratingly limited selection (and a few that nobody is sure why they included them...like The Golf Channel...Portland has way too many 9 and 18 hole courses, a couple 32s and a 128 hole course...Portlanders spend too much time golfing to watch other people golf...or the TV Guide and any of the home shopping channels...nobody watches those.) and the best signal in town compared to anything else. Their digital cable service has way, way more channels, but you pay a lot for it, and there's only about 5 good ones, each on a separate lineup, each costs something like another $8/ea on top of the digital premium and analog service. The MPEG-2 encoding is really substandard. It's like watching satellite in the ever-present rainstorms here (anybody who lives here can tell you, rain falls nearly horizontal, anything else is just high humidity. The locals do not carry umbrellas: they don't work well in the wind (when it's actually raining), but aren't worth the trouble for the more springlike brief showers.).

    On the other hand, if you use a TiVo, and always record on the lowest quality, you're not going to notice too much of a difference with satellite, though bad weather will noticably chop up the signal (wind and wildlife vibrating or reaiming the dish, dense clouds/fog, heavy rain, ice forming on it in cold weather, snow buildup, etc), I remember when times were better and I shared a 4BR/2BA house with a bunch of friends and we could easily afford every channel DirecTV offered, nice clear warm night, open all the doors and windows, and turn on a movie with a signal so clear you would have thought you were on analog cable and lived inside the headend.

    Broadband, however...I've had Verizon and Qwest and some time or another for a DSL provider. They both suck so bad that I don't even trust them with my landline anymore, they lost my business to Vonage. Cable is the least of all evils. They'll let you get internet service a-la carte without television if you want (which is how we did it in said big-ass house, plus half of us worked for @Home, so we got 30Mbps/10Mbps for free anyway). The half of us in that house that worked for @Home, both used and loved @Home. I knew, at the time, about as many people who worked for Qwest and one guy who worked for Verizon. All the guys who worked for Qwest really had a hard time even selling their service to their customers, and were @Home customers themselves and loved cable. The guy from Verizon might know where the power button on a computer is if it's got a big, neon sign flashing, pointing at it, and the button itself is illuminated and clearly labelled.

    The correct answer should be intuitive by this point. 8:o)

    --
    Help us build a better map!
    1. Re:Cable in Portland by tjrw · · Score: 1

      I'm in PDX too.

      I just dumped Comcast Digital Cable and their overpriced service (after they screwed around with the lineup one time too many) and went to DirecTV with a 3-LNB dish (HD-ready) and a DirecTiVo. I should have dome this ages ago.

      Let me see...
      DirecTV service is cheaper (as is the DirecTiVo service).
      Dual tuners in the DirecTiVo.
      Picture quality is awesome (I think it's better than many of the cable channels - looks less compressed). So far, the weather has had no effect whatsoever.
      Dolby digital optical sound and S-video out instead of the crap composite video and standard stereo connectors on the digital cable box.
      Local channels are available.

      So basically pretty much everything the cable companies put out in their adverts is a bare-faced lie (another thing that annoyed me enough to get off my butt and do something).

      Get Sattelite - you won't regret it :-)

  594. Oh, important by Sivar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    An important note:
    Many problems with installations are from people ordering their stuff from a backwater sleezeball company.
    I recommend you get your stuff directly from DirecTV or from a reputable vendor like Best Buy, Circuit City, etc.
    Calling 1-800-DIRECTV does not necessarily get you to DirecTV itself!
    It is a national # setup to route you to a local dealer.
    If you want to actually get your stuff from direcTV, call the general customer service phone # at 800-355-5000 and do whatever you need to do to talk to someone from the phone menu. It doesn't matter who. Then, ask for the sales department. They will ask if you have a credit card (say YES) and if you have ever had DirecTV before (say NO).

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  595. correction to correction by polymath69 · · Score: 1
    A standalone Tivo will work anywhere - cable, sattelite, antenna, whatever else somebody can come up with.

    Almost. It won't work with C-band satellite.

    Pisses me off, frankly.

    --

    --
    I don't want to rule the world... I just want to be in charge of mayonnaise.
  596. Weather can affect the dish BAD by SnapperHead · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A friend of mine, had a dish for 6 months, we hang out at his house all the time to drink, watch movies, sports, etc.

    Durring this time, there was a huge blizard that rolled through. The picture quailty was really bad, when there was signal at all. We had to keep going outside to clean the dish off. If anything gets inside it, it will start crapping out.

    Durring normal rain, you will notice little "bleeps" here and there on the picture. Typically, it only happens 2 times durring a 1 hour show and its very minor. However, durring very heavy down pours, the signal disappears. At times, there is signal but its unbareable to even look at.

    The only times wind will affect your signal, is if your dish isn't properly secured. Any movment on the dish will create poor signal. Of course things like leaves, branchs, acorns, etc will create problems.

    Now, he moved over to digital cable. It rocks, very little downtime at all. Plus, ondemand is great. Just make sure you get the best package they have. Starz and Cenimax are the best ondemand packages out there. The movie selection is generally much better. Depending on your cable provider, they are usually free access as long as you have the big package. I rent over 100 movies a month with it for free. Beats renting from the video store. But, the video store is going to have a better selection :P

    I would recommend what others have suggested. Get cable first, try it for a few months, then switch to the dish. The dish companys are giving out good deals to people who switch from cable. Try it for a few months, if you don't like it vs cable, many cable companys are giving out the same deals to switch back.

    --
    until (succeed) try { again(); }
  597. Just Remember 4 Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Italian Food
    German Cars
    Satellite TV
    Cable Internet

    Mix these up at your peril.

  598. Satellite TV rules, TiVo is overrated by Pod_Bay_Doors · · Score: 1

    I've got the Dish Network, and only have problems with reception in exceptionally bad thunderstorms (few times a year at max). TiVo is expensive and redundant. Just get a good capture/graphics card with 1080i support and you can do all kinds of video capture/editing/compression on your PC.

  599. HD DirectTivo by LazyBoy · · Score: 1
    I'm a cable subscriber. I'd get DirectTv if it were possible from my location.

    Tivo is great. Can't live without it.

    HD is great.

    DirectTV will have an HD DirectTivo box very soon, if it's not out yet. There will not be a HD Tivo box for cable for a relatively long time.

    I'd suggest waiting for the HD DirectTivo box to come out, then sign up for DirectTv. The best deals and newest boxes always go to new subscribers.

    --

    If Chaos Theory has taught us anything, it's that we must kill all the butterflies.

  600. if you like your DSL... by xfrosch · · Score: 1

    I'd go with satellite TV. The Comcast campaign is ridiculous FUD. I have seen rain outages of competently installed satellite receivers in really heavy rainfall, but just as often (i.e., very rarely) I have seen entire cable systems taken out by malfunction or misadjustment of hardware at the headend.

    You usually have a pretty good idea of when a thunderstorm is going to end; good luck trying to explain an engineering problem to the customer service rep who answers the cable company's phone.

    (I'm a Comcast customer, but that's because I live six miles from the CO, well out of DSL range, under a lot of big trees.)

  601. DirecTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have had DirecTV for nearly seven years now. I live in the rainy Pacific Northwest. I have only lost signal at the most 4 times and each episode was less than 30 seconds.

    I just replaced my original Sony reciever with a used Sony SAT T-60 which contains an integrated Tivo. I cannot get over how much better the picture looks when viewing a directv/tivo recording vs a separate Tivo unit recording. It also allows timeshifting of all content.

    I obtained this reciever from my father-in-law and he had nothing but complaints about it. I checked his signal strength before he replaced it and it was below 70%. His was a so-call professional install. I did my install myself and get a sold 98% signal with both my old reciever and his. I think spending the extra time on the dish alignment pays off.

    My only compaint about DirecTV would be the slower response of the program guides as they added local channels and the increased compression on some channels.

  602. Tried them all.... and here's my verdict: by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Digital cable isn't bad if you can get a good deal on it, or if you're forced to deal with it due to obstacles to satellite signal reception. Satellite is generally a better value though. If you're heavily into sports, DirecTV has a little more to offer, while if you're not, Dish seems like a slightly better option.

    One thing to consider is that as DirecTV and Dish have added more programming, they've had to split it up over multiple satellites. Back when I first set up my DTV dish, I only had to point it in one place and I was done. Nowdays, they want to set things up so at least two satellites are being picked up at once, and the receiver switches between them as needed. Someone across the street from me has tall trees in their yard that block out my reception on one of the additional satellites -- so I can't ever get some of the newer channels they added. (Luckily for me, it's not yet a big issue. The stuff I'm missing is nothing I'd watch anyway.... but it will become a BIG problem if I upgrade to HD and want the special HD stations they added.)

    Just FYI, too - there have traditionally been lots of people getting satellite because they had intentions of hacking it and getting "all the channels" for the price of just a basic subscription (or in some cases, without one at all). Right now, it's a *rough* time for people trying to go that route. DirecTV, in particular, has gotten VERY aggressive at prosecuting vendors of the programming/hacking tools needed to pull it off. Dish recently sent down card/firmware updates that knocked out some of the long-standing commercial "hacked cards" you could slip in your receiver and unlock all the programming. The folks supporting these hacks have largely sold their U.S. or Canadian operations to off-shore groups of unknown trustworthiness, too.

  603. Turn off that TV, dude... by vudufixit · · Score: 1

    And turn on real life.

  604. Satellite or Cable? by Indrid · · Score: 1
    Well, I didn't use to work for Comcast, But I did used to work for DirecTV and I must say, I've used both services and Cable does have a point as far as the dish direction and weather issues. Moisture in general will black your satellite signal, try to imagine a satellite signal as a beam of light and a rain drop or any form of water will act like a prism, refracting the light as it goes through the water. This interrupts your signal but it will come back as soon as the weather passes. Also another issue is dish direction, this all depends on your location in the States as well. The main DirecTV Satellite, for us in Utah is to the South East, whilest the main Echostar (Dish Network) satellite is a few degrees off of direct South and if your Dish is not directed in that position you will loose signal and will have to either reposition it yourself or have a professional do it. In most cases the dish is secured so well that this wouldn't happen, it really all depends on how good of an installation you had and if you have kids who live in your neighborhood that play ball a lot. These are all factors that you need to consider when going with a Dish.

    On the other hand, cable is a chaotic beast, if you loose signal with cable, and you will, trust me, you will have no idea what is going on because the cable lines are under the ground where they could be cut into with a shovel or something of this manner, OR in the worst case scenario, it's something on the cable company's side or has something to do with your local city utilities cutting into the ground and cutting some wires which could be fixed in an hour, or a week; it really just depends upon how many people there are with cable in your area.

    So ultimately, it's your call. You WILL get a better picture and more choices in viewing options with Dish Viewing, or you can have the "always on" (pun intended) cable signal that looks extremely pixelated with little blocks of color that are annoying as hell.

    I hope this helps with your decision making.

  605. Weather Absolutely affects quality by JoshWurzel · · Score: 1

    I live in Berkeley, and we suffer serious "rain fade" during the winter. I've been without signal for a whole night during "hard" rains (and this is Berkeley, where we don't get flash floods). If the winds are strong, that might create problems too.

    Dish is far from perfect, but I'm happy enough with the quality to avoid dealing with cable outages.

    And yes, my incoming signal is about 99/100, for those who are about to tell me to adjust my dish.

  606. Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be honest about it cable sucks satellite TV is better the TV spots about how satellite TV signals can be lost in the wind from a fart from your nieghbor is bull. If the signal goes out you can bet cables out too. And where I live sat is cheaper than cable plus with sat you get to choose your channel mostly not a board of brian dead market subjects supposed to represent the average viewer.

  607. What about BBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know of a cable or satelite service which has access to BBC (not BBC America)?

    1. Re:What about BBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about one with al-jazeera?

  608. Be Wary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Despite the argument of cable being better in the rain, y local cable provider uses satellite to obtain their feed, so when it is raining, the cable's signal is often as bad as using a home satellite. Their dish is more powerful, so it might not be as bad, but there is definately degradation of the signal. The local channels on the cable are picked up by an antenna, so their signal can be crappy, too.

  609. My experiences by gordguide · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cable is reliable, assuming your local provider is above the sham level. If you're a "bring it on and I don't want to deal with it" kind of guy, you'll prefer cable.

    Satellite has advantages, mostly in the way of programming choices over cable. With cable you're stuck with whatever deal your local provider offers; sat offers choice and in my humble opinion should be seen as programming options rather than service options.

    Number one, as always, is cost. Where I'm from, cable and sat are pretty much identical; so it's a push. If that's not the case with your providers, it's gotta be a consideration.

    Sat can be unreliable if the dish isn't installed properly.

    The sat companies tend to underplay the installation issues. "Buy the dish, throw it up damn near anywhere, you're good to go" is the mantra. They're lying.

    You want a solid dish mount. The sat companies tend to suggest that you can just use the cheezy mount that comes in the box and go. In my experience, a handy person can do better and it pays off. My sat is stabilized with "aircraft cable" and turnbuckles, and doesn't move a fraction of an inch in 60 mph winds. It's also mounted on a pole that puts it above power lines and the neighbors. The mount/dish they give you will wallow like jello in a decent wind and you will notice it.

    Sat is a kind of digital link, in that as long as you get 55% or so signal, it's fine. Drop below that even a bit and it starts to crap out, and in a digital sort of way it's all good or it's all crap. I get 85% plus and in a 60 mph gale or solid downpour I still get over 60%.

    Even if they swear the little dish they give you is fine, you can always do better with a bigger dish. The improvement in signal strength really matters if trouble-free is important to you. Spring for a larger dish and you will never regret it; it does make a big difference.

    People who lose reception due to snow, rain and obstructions are people who bought the party line and use the dish that comes with the cheapest bundle, and mounted it the way the instructions said to. I live in a heavy snow zone and it's less of a problem than rain or wind. You can buy a cover that is signal-transparent but keeps snow and rain off the dish. They work fine.

    Don't believe their lies (and by "their" I mean the dish networks, not the users, who, after all, just trusted the sat company to tell it like it is).

    If that's too much trouble or not a viable option due to your location or whatever, then go with cable. Personally I despise the cable company, but I'm not too proud to suck it up when they're the best option. If I lived in an apartment I'd go cable without a second thought.

  610. Get cable local infrastructure fixed? by Shabazz+Rabbinowitz · · Score: 1

    Okay, slightly off topic...

    Is there any secret to getting the cable company (Cablevision here in Westchester County, NY) to fix the local infrastructure?

    The first broadband available was cable, and while it worked, it was great. But I would lose the signal at least 3 times a week. Sometimes on weekends (when we would notice it) the signal would go up and down every five minutes.

    Yep, we had all the Cablevision idiots out every other week. And of course, when they showed up, it would be working. Or they would replace coaxial cable, and show off their technical skills but showing me that the center conductor moved ("yeah, last guy already showed me that...")

    I finally noticed that when my digital cable signal was lost, channels 2, 4 and 5 would get fuzzy or worse.

    Every "technician" would claim it was the cable running from the basement up into the house, but with the cable modem at the Cablevision demarc point in the basement, I would drop the signal.

    Neighbors across the street haven't reported similar problems, so I assuming (yeah, yeah...) that it's not the entire neighborhood loop.

    I'm trying to balance having to take 4 hours off work every other week to stand in my basement and watch some knucklehead replace coaxial cable vs. wanting that faster access back. But I can't seem to convince anyone at Cablevision that it's out there (*pointing at the pole across the street*) and not in my house.

    Twenty miles north of Times Square and I can't get more than 128K....sheeeesh......

  611. Loss of picture a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have had cable for over 10 years and DirecTV for about 1 year. In the year that I have had DirecTV it has made it through thunderstorms, hail, snow, and a hurricane. I have lost signal twice (once required removing snow from the dish and LNB). My system was self installed with no special meters or hardware (it is screwed into my back fence).

    Maybe the people that have such a hard time with signal on Sat are having their systems installed by the cable company contractors.

  612. Dish PVR - no monthly fee by wytcld · · Score: 1

    Um, there's no monthly fee for the Dish PVR. The one I have (think it's a 508) occassionally ends up in a software loop that requires a reboot (maybe every 2-3 months) but otherwise works quite nicely. Image quality is much better than normal cable. The features on the PVR are fewer than on a Tivo, but then I find Tivo's graphics and sound effects annoying. As for outages in bad weather - yes, in severe thunder storms the signal can be lost for some minutes. Funny thing is, here in Vermont the local Adelphia cable also gets its signal via satellite, and also goes out in those storms. Snow has never affected my signal - and we do see a lot of that.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    1. Re:Dish PVR - no monthly fee by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Depends on which package you get. You can pay up front for the box ($200+) or you can get the box for "free" and pay $5/month. Choose your poison.

      As for TiVo graphics/sound -- you can turn off the sound you know. Can't do anything about the graphics, but this is also the first time I've ever heard someone complain about them. Shrug. To each their own.

  613. Dish is pretty good about this... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    On the Dish network, you can create a number (forget how many) of custom lists that you shift between by hitting the "Guide" button more than once - with the last one you used as a default so you don't have to keep hunting down lists.

    I have an HDTV and a normal box, both do the same thing though the HDTV box does not offer a live view of the current channel while you are selecting in the guide.

    My only beef with Dish is that I wish a lot more channels were in HDTV, I would go with Voom in a heartbeat if the price dropped below $500. Paying $10 a month for Discovery HDTV just to get one decent channel of HD is rather pitiful. I also get Los Angeles CBS in HDTV thanks to a special waver, though they are shifted about two hours from my timezone so I have to watch stuff late if I want to see it on HDTV.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  614. Comcast sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have comcast, it sucks, its really expensive, and I have the much touted "on demand", its rrrrrrreeeeeeeaaaallllllyyyyy sllloooowwww... Half the time the server is down, and you can't record your own shows, even though there is a record button, and they imply it in ads. Plus, I think they use mpeg's or something, becouse the on demand shows looks really blocky, like its compressed, and then screen doubled. Also, there is no support, and I lose cable all the time. I would perfer cable, but comcast is a really bad company. Don't give them your money. There analog service is pretty good, and you can use a tivo, with no trickery. You can't find out about in online, you have to call, becouse they are trying to get everyone to digital (picture looks exactly the same, and worse on on demand)
    -James

  615. XPlay is actually pretty good... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Sure some of their stuff is behind, but sometimes you catch news on things you missed. And TechLive is only a day or two behind Slashdot usually, not three months...

    But really TechTV is worth it just for XPlay. Once you get beyond the hokey 8th-grade camera work, it's a pretty good show with decent reviews and the hosts are pretty good as well.

    I'm sure I'll run into some die-hard haters of Xplay from posting this, but a few other people I know also really like it, so it's not just me...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  616. Satellite rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have DirecTV. Before that I had Mediacom (run by Charter Communications now), and I had two major complaints...the picture quality was bad, and the only channels (aside from the premiums) that were stereo were the local channels! This became more of a problem when I finally got my home theater system and wanted good sound source from my TV programming, so I switched to DirecTV. I have only experience rain fade on a couple of occasions, and only for a few minutes. I have heard that if it is that big of a deal, you can get a bigger dish which will counteract most of that, but I haven't really missed it since most of what I watch is recorded with the ReplayTV so I can skip the commercials, and most programs are on non-network channels, so they show things a couple of times a day.

    I have been VERY pleased with DirecTV in comparison to what I was getting with Mediacom. I use a ReplayTV for it, and it works flawlessly. Would I switch again? YOU BET.

    The only drawback in my mind (and is not really an issue for me, since I'm the only one in the house) is that extra receivers cost an additional $4.95 a month for access. But, I will say that when they claim the price is $39.99 for the basic package with local channels, that's exactly how much it is... no tacking on additional FCC BS charges and taxes... my bill is $39.99 spot on, and that's what they advertised...no hidden charges.

  617. Cable Sucks ! Go with Dish or Direct TV by cpane · · Score: 1

    I hate cable (Time Warner) for a variety of reasons, let me share a couple.

    Last year, there was lots of press on the DishNetwork Direct TV Merger. This would have resulted in better coverage for both Direct TV and Dish Customers = More Local Channels, more overall channels better service options. This was a nightmare to the cable companies, because all they had over Dish was local channels. As it turns out, the Cable companies lobbied enough to Washington to get the Feds to not allow the merger.

    The current Cable TV Plan to foil the Dish services is to get the Feds to put a Tax on Satellite services so that the price is closer to the cable prices. The scary thing is that they are making progress in some states.

    Dish Network or Direct TV are cheaper, superior products.

  618. I miss satellite by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

    Back when I lived in that big house with a bunch of friends, satellite was dirt cheap. Just kinda sucked if a storm hit right after everybody left for work, or a goose re-aimed the dish...would crap out, and we'd draw straws to see who would go climb for it. Not a fun prospect when icy. Now I just can't get it where I'm at...I'm downtown, the south side of the building faces a skyscraper, I'm on the north face, the landlord wouldn't allow it anyway, probably some city code, and the resistance to want to hang out of a third-story window with heavy equipment above concrete, a traffic light and a parked car.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  619. Cable TV forces too much advertising on you by jimminy_cricket · · Score: 1

    I have Dish Network. I chose it after looking at several of my friend's installations. One of them has digital cable from Comcast. The big trouble with Comcast is that they force commercials on you while you are in the channel menu screen. I see enough commercials already without having to watch more while selecting what channel to watch!

    In addition, Comcast menus are awful. Hideously aggravating to navigate and slow to respond. The screen of channels and show times is not at all easy to use. It is not simple to find what shows are coming up. The menus on Dish Network are far simpler and saner.

    The awful menus turned me off from cable, but the advertising they put in the menus sent me running.

  620. DTV vs Cable by spacenut20 · · Score: 1

    I work for a national CE chain and sell DirectTV, so maybe I am a little bias, but having had cable for so long I have to say DTV is better than cable. I pay $45 a month for two boxes, one with Tivo, and get as many channels (if not more) than cable. The only time I have lost my signal has been in extremely cold weather, not snow or rain. And as a new customer you can get your equipment for cheap or even free on a promotion. There is also a wider selection of HDTV programing too. Did that sound *too* much like a sales pich? ;)

  621. vod by meattome · · Score: 1

    i love the VOD service, no emabarrsing moments ordering porn, and it's great being able to fast forward thru the bad parts :), I also love my RR, fast and pretty relible....but in maine we were (are) the test market for their 'digital phone' basically it's a voip phone that uses their rr network....it's killer

  622. My 2 cents by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    I am a satellite installer. I have been installing both Dish Network and DirecTV full time for about 4 years.

    In my area, Western Washington St., the biggest drive in the satellite market over the last year has been Comcast. About two years ago Atnt changed to Comcast. I have had countless customers tell me there bill when up $20-$40 with no change in programming. Second biggest complaint is that they loose all or some of there channels on a daily to monthly basis. Next is probably that they just hate comcast.

    As far as signal loss is concerned, a properly installed/aligned dish should VERY rarely loose signal. I have had mine for about 4 years and have seen my signal go out once for about 5 minutes. About 2 months ago we had the heaviest rain day on record for Washington St. What I have heard from most customers is that they lost their signal for about 5-15 minutes total over the whole day. I have cable Internet (Satellite Internet sucks) and it is out much more often than my Dish.

    Also if a dish I tightened down securely It shouldn't move even in a very strong wind. It should take a 100+ MPH wind which would more likely bend it and/or rip it off your house.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  623. Satellite Beats Anything If It's All You Can Get! by ReVeR5408 · · Score: 0

    Well I don't really know much about Directv (execpt for what i've read on slashdot) because i come from South Africa. The national media provider here SABC doesn't offer cable, only satellite. And most of our satellite channels are european!

    Like we only get MTVE instead of the usual 3 or so different MTV channels. The South African national channels suck so badly that often the only thing to do is to get satellite and pay like crazy amount for it per month.

    And because most of our channels are european, that means that we in sunny south africa often lose our signals because of the poor weather in europe.

    So overall, satellite beats anything in my country!

  624. Re:Tivo is fantastic, but doesn't work for everyth by NateTech · · Score: 1

    Gee that's funny, I know of at least two people happily using that exact setup in the Denver area.

    They haven't done anything special to their boxes (including not covering anything with tape).

    Maybe Comcast loves their employees so much they sent your g/f home with a refurbished hunk of crap that has a bad I/R receiver?

    --
    +++OK ATH
  625. Adelphia by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    $83.44/month gets me 170 TV channels and 45 music channels with Adelphia (Cinemax, Showtime, Starz, but not HBO). It's a lot of money, but the same price would bring me fewer channels with either DirectTV or DISH. Outages have been about 12 hours a year due to trees falling on cables & similar events.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  626. A few things to consider by Gumber · · Score: 1

    1. Why are you tied to DSL. I'm aware of some of its theoretical advantages, and in my market, its the only way to get more than 128 kbps up, but technology evolves, as does the way companies tune and deploy it, so it may be worth looking at a bundle of Cable IP & TV again.

    2. Cable systems and satelites are both bandwidth constrianed, and HDTV takes a lot of bandwidth. Even before HDTV, satelite and digital cable providers were overcompressing stuff just so they could fit in a few more pay per view channels. One result is that their HDTV quality is often below that you could get with a decent broadcast antenna. Not only that, but it might get better or worse depeding on whatever else they are trying to cram down the pipe.

  627. The dog sneezes? Oh please... by podo · · Score: 1

    It depends on price, really. What ever is cheaper there. Just make sure you get digitally based satellite (asif anybody does analogue anymore) Here in South Africa we can buy only satellite for R350 (aprox. $50 US) per month. We also used to have free analogue satellite, but the SABC scrapped it because nobody was watching anyway. With the digital platform we have here, video is encoded into MPEG2 (at reasonable quality) with stereo and all such, and then encrypted with Irdeto2 crypto to try and stop people stealing the content. The decoder I use is manufactured by a local company (I think called UPC) and comes with a particularly handy feature, ie, it has statistics on signal quality and decoded stream quality, etc etc. Generally, even in heavy rain, signal quality rarely drops below 85% or so, and stream quality never drops below 100% unless signal quality goes below 70%. This has only happened once, in a particularly violant hail storm that managed to knock my LNB out of alignment. You are bound to see some compression artifacts with explosions and fast moving objects passing, but that happens anywhere when things get compressed. The only other times I've ever seen much artifacts is when the stupid irdeto system goes cranky and "forgets" to decrypt some part of the stream, leaving the MPEG decoder with garbled MPEG to try and work with. The digital system (like DAB radios) is also resistent to polyphase interference (ie, signal bouncing off nearby buildings, mountains, etc) so as long as your dish has a clear view of the sky, you need never worry about such things. Stay away from analogue satellite though, that is very vulnerable to interference, even complete cancellation of the signal, and goes very snowy when it rains. Low flying aircraft are an annoyance, but something flying low enough to disrupt your signal will generally mess up other things too (interference with hi-fi gear, TV, computers, etc) so the same thing will happen to cable, although the signal will not be disturbed, your TV tube will probably be doing hoola hoops if a big chopper flies over the roof.

  628. Dish has better porn by _damnit_ · · Score: 1

    I have seen all the channels on both and DISH has better stuff. Directv only has porn certain hours of the day, whereas DISH has it on 24/7. Thats kinda cool for Sat morns with the wife.

    --


    _damnit_

    It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
  629. Cable Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my opinion, Comcast cable ads boarder on the criminally deceptive. I think my comcast cable has been out much more often than my friends Dish network. Picture quality is much better off the dish as well as the prices for each tier of service is MUCH cheaper than cable.

    The only reason I don't have a dish is the landlord won't let me attach one to the side of the apartment. >:-P

  630. Re:Sat Porn on DISH (was Re:DirecTV *does* have pr by Galaganut · · Score: 1

    I agree about not watching live tv. What did we do before the DVR! My model will timeshift backwards up to an hour. I really like being able to decide 20 or 30 minutes into a show or program that "Hey I want to tape this" instead of "man I wish I had taped that!". I do have the "boober-bowl" on tape for that reason! And it was my wife who said "we HAVE to rewind that!". We recently changed from DTV to dish because of the free install of the dish with 2 rooms and the DVR, which was much better than the one room DTV receiver we have had for 6 years!

    --
    IMHO... "If your opinion were truely humble, wouldn't you keep it t yourself?"
  631. Sat TV vs Cable by ender_pete · · Score: 1

    Ive had both Digital cable and Sat Tv over the past few years and i have to say i much more satisfied with my Sat TV. I have Dishnetwork and i have one of their PVR's that thing makes me so happy. I can let my wife watch anything she wants and still record all my cartoons and geek shows i want to see for later viewing. The only time my Sat TV has lost reception is when there is a really major storm, im up near DC in virginia so it doesnt really storm around here to much. As for which Sat TV provider you should use it depends on exactly which channels you want dishnetwork and direct tv both offer decent packages and there pretty close on price so you should look and see what channels you want.
    Me i have 150 channels plus 8 HBO channels and i pay about 75 bucks a month for 3 rooms. i get all the channels i really want cartoon network, all the history and discovery channels, nasa, and some other geek channels.

    --
    ender_pete
  632. Those same problems also apply to cable sometimes by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

    I haven't tried satellite TV, but my Charter cable TV has gone out a couple times during inclement weather, and more often bad weather causes a deteriorated signal.

    Doesn't cable TV get to regional offices via satellite and get sent from those offices to the customers by cable?

    --
    -Rich
  633. If it was only a branch.... by wiredog · · Score: 1

    But it's not. It's a patch of trees in the park next door. In summer, when they're all leafed out, the signal is degraded enough that it isn't worth trying.

  634. Never mind, found it. by raygundan · · Score: 1

    You want the ChannelMaster GainMaster triple-LNB dish. It's a direct replacement for the DirecTV Phase III tri-LNB dish, and will give you 65% more signal while only annoying your significant other 25% more than the normal dish.

    This place has it available in a variety of packages with multiswitches and diplexers, etc...

  635. Dish Network by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    I have Dish Network, and I'm pretty happy with it. It does lose signal during _very_ intense thunderstorms, but usually not for long. It's actually a nice warning - the TV signal blanks out about 5-10 min before the deluge comes - just long enough to get the dogs into the yard to do their business. NASA is on channel 213, and rules! I have one of their PVR's - it's not as nice as an real Tivo, but it doesn't suck. It really does change the way you watch TV.

    The best reason to choose satellite over cable is the ability to watch TV during power outages/natural disasters. I have a generator, and as long as that puppy is running, I've got satellite reception and local channels. When hurricane Isabel whacked the Richmond, VA area, cable's TV and 'net access were both out for 3-4 weeks! Ouch!

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  636. Wow! Nitpicking! by raygundan · · Score: 1

    Hilarious.

    I *am* lazy, but no, I didn't make it up. You can thank my spending too much time in the tivocommunity.com forums, where everybody types things like "standalone tivo" and "DirecTV DVR Powered By Tivo" so much that it kinda makes sense to abbreviate as "SA Tivo," "Dtivo," "DirecTivo," or "DirecTV Tivo".

    I didn't notice any smirking about my mislabeling of the DirecTV DVR Powered by Tivo-- too hard too correct me on that one, too? Half-assed nitpicking, at best.

  637. Sky by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

    here in the uk we have sky and when it rains heavily we can lose the reception. at another house i was at it was worse but it really isn't an issue

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  638. Duct Tape + DirecTivo = clear reception by hymie3 · · Score: 1

    I have a DirecTivo. I set it up the week of Christmas, in the dark. I didn't have the correct mounting bracket (actually, I'm renting it from a friend), so I used duct tape to secure the dish in place. I am shocked at how effective this kludge actually works. I made one adjustment (after I hooked up the second tuner) and it's been fine ever since.

    We've had several major storms, only one caused artifacting in the signal on a few of the channels. I can only imagine that a real mounting bracket would eliminate that problem.

    YMMV, of course, but I've had absolutely no complaints about the reception.

  639. Satellite TV fine...if tuned properly!!!! by unics · · Score: 0

    All,

    I lost my satellite signal only once. That was during a hurricane. During the numerous snows and rain storms we have had in the past year here in Maryland I have never once had a degredation in signal quality once.

    There are a couple of things you need to watch out for when getting satellite tv.

    1. Have RG6 cable ran instead of RG59. RG59 cable is significantly cheaper and has a higher rate of loosing signal.

    2. Make sure your ends on the RG6/59 cable are crimped properly. An improper crimp can result in loss of signal to the receiver.

    3. Make sure when the installer comes, they fine tune it. Most installers are just part timers that want to make an extra bang for their buck. A *real* satellite installer will have a digital computer that feeds from the lnb directly into this unit. It can preceisely determine how strong the signal is.

    WARNING: If your satellite installer just points the dish and asks you to watch the tv to see if you get signal he/she is not equiped with the right tools to do the installation. You should never have to use the satellite receiver as a gauge.

    I also live in a heavily wooded area and have never lost satellite signal. I also have GermanTV which points to TelStar5. I never have any problems with that even though it is not a concentrated signal like DirecTV or Dish Network.

    Satellite companies are not created equal.
    DirecTV has only 1 1/2 satellites for SD programming. They have another satellite for HD programming. DirecTV has noticeable problems because the signal is compressed so much.

    Dish Network has a much better signal quality and they offer local channels now too. My Dish will soon be upgraded to 3 lnb's (SuperDish). Dish Network is by far much better in price and signal quality than DirecTV will ever be. Dish Network does not compress the signal so that they can fit more channels onto a transponder. Rather, the launch another satellite into space. I highly recommend checking their website out. They have launched almost a dozen satellites since the 1980s.

  640. DirecTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It boils down artifacting vs signal loss. If the cable signal is excellent, probably advantage cable, but most likely the signal loss on cable will be worse than the artifacting. Also, you don't get ghosting, etc, with cable. Also, it seems that they pump the bandwidth up on certain channels/events, so like a pay per view sporting event will not have nearly as much artifacting, if any at all.
    Another thing, digital cable... lots of artifacting in that as well, probably worse. And, the channels that you CAN get without getting digital are STILL analog even with digital. I've had that too.

    As for signal loss, I've had that once in a blizzard. Other times my dish is covered in snow inches deep and it doesn't go out. I was actually surprised. In fact, we had more outages with CABLE than I've had with Satilite.

    Tivo, get a stand alone unit. With the DirecTV ones, you can only record at one quality and you can't record off the air channels and programs. You'll still need an antenna for air programs and the Tivo is a great way to multiplex satilite and air and get all the programs in your guide. As for quality, I record things like stand up, etc, at lowest quality because I can basically watch them whenever there's nothing else on and have quite a few lined up. Wasted disk space to record those at the DirecTV bandwidth.

  641. Weather effects by harleyb253 · · Score: 1

    In a really hard rain/snow fall here in Cincinnati, I lose some signal strength, but it hasn't lasted more than a couple of minutes, yet. The Apocalypse, of course, is due any day, which wil certianly put a damper on things. My only gripe with my service (DTV) is when I try to run more than 2 boxes at a time, in different rooms. The unit in the living room freezes up almost completely. Their techs kept saying my splitter was to blame, but since it was their equipment, they installed it, replaced it (2x) and they are all in-bred, I still don't have a solution to that. I put up with this truly minor inconvenience because our local area CTV provider is Adelphia, which sucks. TW is in the area, but we're a small pocket of resistance to that sort of assimilation and I don't want their service, either. Overall, I like the bird and if I didn't have DSL, I'd probably get their sat delivery of service. Regards, harleyb

  642. Cable or Dish. by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

    Well Any Problems you see with a dish you can offset by Using a bigger dish or Making the platform its on more stable (I am talking about the mounting platform here :) ).. So your only other Thing is Pricing for the channels you want... Sit down with Listings for the services and Add up charges for what ya want... and choose based on Price of services.

    As for a PVR... I would stay away from a intagrated PVR as it does not follow the KISS concept. Not to mention the Homebrew PVR's are really starting get to a stage where they are stable enough competeing agaist commercial ones and don't seem to have the Privacy invading "features" and don't get scrutenized by Companies about their commercial skipping/deleting features..

    For the most part I see the homebrew PVR's as being your best bet (Mind ya they can get a bit pricey to build when comparing against commercial ones) but your never stuck with monthy subscriptions ect. Not to mention you will end up with a product that has all the features you would want and not the features they think you want that wont cause legal battles :) Alot of people say they are hard to setup.. But you on /. so if you don't know the ins and outs to build one yet.. Chances are you have the basic skills to learn..

    --
    Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
  643. I have a Dish TV 500 PVR by bowenit · · Score: 1

    I also used to do directv and um they are right about the dog sneezing, when it comes to directv. As far as the DISH Network SAT I don't even think the four horsemen of the appocylypse could take it down, and I for one think they tried. I had a storm a few months ago that produced hail, lightning, rain, snow* No I'm not kidding. Any way it still tracked the SAT signal.

    --
    I thought Slim Shadey was nuts, then I met my ex-wife.
  644. Satellite by cbradle · · Score: 1

    Changed to satellite a few months back (DishNet). One day we had a brief episode of nonreception. No other problems. Previously tried Comcast. They seem to bill and bill and bill, regardless of the status of your connection.

  645. Re:DirecTV (Most pr0n today sucks) by Darth23 · · Score: 1

    Between the rampant silicon implants, and the ULTRA shaved region (so hair down there is now "gross" or something?) and the excessive use ot ponytails by guys who look like softcore movie rejects) most o fit is way to slick but mostly pretty uninspired.

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  646. Satellite vs. Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I only have a few comments.

    If you go digital for "picture quality", you'll get MPEG2 decode artifacts with both Satellite and Cable. Remember at the main cable office they are getting their signal from, bum, bum, bum Satellite Dishs. (Bigger ones but still dishes.)

    Heavy Snow (especially accumulating on the dish) and rain do affect the signal of satellite but usually heavy. (As do sun spots.)

    However, If I were choosing I'd go mainly on price. Which is the least for the most useful channels that you want.

  647. Dish Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have had Dish for about 4 years. In that time I've lost signal about 1/2 dozen times as follows:

    1. A full Moon got in-line behind the satelitte and signal was gone for about 10 mintues until that alignment was lost.

    2-5. Snowstorms covered the transponder. Get a super soaking filled with water - problem solved without a ladder.

    5. Receiver went M$ on me and crashed. Lost Dish reception for about 3 days until the re-manf replacement receiver arrived, and then I returned the busted one. Cost me about $100 as I recall.

    Recently I added another receiver in another room and upgraded my transponder to handle the additional recevier. Found all the specs on Dish's website, and all the parts (except for the reciever) on eBay, cheap too. Dish activated the server in about 10 minutes after I had it installed, even though they said it could take up to 24 hours to activate.

    Would I do it again - YES!

    PS: I also have Comcast for cable modem and local teleco, and I am not considering them for TV service due to their "WE KNOW WHAT YOU WANT" attitude. At this point I re-direct all email to another another email account and rarely logon to my account on www.comcast.net and have basic POTS as the local teleco. Their "features" aren't what I want, they are what they want me to want.

  648. You lose sat signal because of clouds not rain... by weedenbc · · Score: 1

    The thick clouds that come with heavy rains and/or thunderstorms are what cause signal degradation. And yes, snow on your dish will do the same thing. Why? Because in order for the dish to work the signal has to reflect off the dish to the antenna. If you remember your high school math, every ray the intersects a parabola get reflected through the vertex. Translation - every signal from the satellite that hits the surface of your dish gets reflected to the LNB at the vertex. If part or all of it is covered with snow it will not reflect properly. Bigger dish = bigger area = more signals getting reflected = more strength at the vertex. I've been a happy DirectTV subsriber since 1998. Why did I get it? FOOTBALL. DirectTV is the only provider that offers IMHO the BEST programming package anyways - Sunday Ticket. For $140 you get every NFL game every Sunday. And as of this year they showed 3 of them in HD (two 1080i, one 480p) every Sunday plus ESPN Sunday Night Football in HD. The Samsung HD reciever that I got as part of a $399 package deal for existing DirectTV subscribers is pretty good. It will decode OTA, satellite, and cable HD signals and has both component and DVI outputs.

    --

    "Trying is only the first step towards failure." - Homer
  649. Tangenting by cur108-17 · · Score: 1

    Is Porn the ONLY motivating factor in getting Cable or Dish?

  650. They get the signal from the same place. by zendal · · Score: 1

    Dish Network and DirecTV both get their signals from a Digital Signal off a Ku Band Satellite.
    The Cable Co. also gets their signals off of C Band and Ku Band Satellites analog and Digital besides the local signals it gets from Terrestial Anttenas. I've sat here and watched my signal go out when it rained due the cable co lost the signal. The cable co also jacks up prices and has a monopoly. They only have certain packages. While good ol' C Band has serveral providers that let you pick the channels you want besides the ones in the free. While Dish and DirectTV provide you with the packages they have, but you can hack the card and get all the channels for free if you was a less scupulous person. DirectTV and Dish Network are providing free installation and free system for 3 rooms. Which consist of a Dual LNB or Dual LNA Dish and a single LNB/LNA Dish and 3 receivers. There is also the fact that TV's and TV Cards are cable ready for ease of recording on the 1984 case of the VTR with Sony. Digital equipment is being blocked by adding a flags. Then there is the fact of HDTV having cards in the sets to enable the use of Digital Cable so there will no longer need to be a Digital Cable box. While Satellite will still need the receiver to get the signal off the satellites. Cable has also a what they think they need for channels on your lineup while Satellite carries all of them.

    There is the info I can best give you as watching Satellite on big C Band dishes as a child and the new DirectTV dishes when I visit home. While I have cable at my house.